• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Bark louder, little dog.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

No one could have predicted…

I really should read my own blog.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

This fight is for everything.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Come on, man.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

The revolution will be supervised.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Plentiful choices and selection/screening effects in plan design

Plentiful choices and selection/screening effects in plan design

by David Anderson|  September 17, 20208:29 am| 10 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Insurers in most states have tremendous amount of flexibility.  Their plans need to be approved by state regulators but the regulators are often looking for network adequacy (are there enough doctors/hospitals in the local network), actuarial soundness (are the premiums sufficient to cover claims and not force the company to fail), and then there will be checks for actuarial value which is a standardized calculator that CMS publishes, and a few other secondary concerns.  Some states like New Jersey have fairly restrictive cost sharing rules that insurers can maneuver within to get to a desired actuarial value.  However, most insurers in most states can design their plans’ cost sharing with minimal restrictions.

This is important as there is tremendous functional space for insurers to maneuver around in.  I’ve pulled up every non-CSR silver plan sold on Healthcare.gov and plotted maximum out of pocket and deductible cost sharing for each plan for 2020.

 

Silver Deductible and MOOP 2020 on HC.Gov

There is tremendous variation. I want to pull out two cases that illustrate some extremes of the potential for screening and selection (Chenyoun Liu has a great paper on this topic).

The red arrow points to a $0 deductible, $8,150 maximum out of pocket plan. Most of the cost sharing is going to be very large co-pays for inpatient hospitalizations and big co-insurance. These plans are attractive to people who think that they are unlikely to be in the hospital but could see themselves at the urgent care or PCP a few times.

The green arrow points to a single silver plan sold in South Dakota where the deductible and the maximum out of pocket is $4,200. All of the cost sharing is in the deductible. This plan’s cost sharing design is attractive to someone who knows that they have a massive set of claims coming as their total exposure is far less than it could be for other ~70% actuarial value plans.

There is tremendous amount of cost  sharing variation within state and even within county for a single metal tier.  This makes comparing plans and expected expenditures difficult without expert support.  It also makes academic analysis challenging.  This is why I’m looking at California as their rule sets waives away most of the variation and allows for far cleaner comparisons even at the cost of potential generalizability.

Buying insurance is tough in the best choice environment.  The ACA individual markets are not that even if they are better choice environments than the unregulated insurance market as analyzed by the GAO.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Thursday Morning Open Thread: The Democrats Are Grown-Ups
Next Post: Open Thread: Biden on Covid-19 and a Little Princess Bride Fun 1»

Reader Interactions

10Comments

  1. 1.

    dnfree

    September 17, 2020 at 10:44 am

    This doesn’t have anything to do with the subject of this column, but I have an ongoing discussion with a right-wing relative.  This is what he sent me a couple of days ago.  I haven’t so far been able to find any articles to explain where this goes wrong (although I’m pretty sure it does).  Do you have any suggestions as to where to look?  Don’t take too much time away from your day job!

    What Imperial College London did was to use a model that overestimated the infection fatality rate by a factor of ten.
    We now know, as the IFR rates of various countries falls and falls, that the Imperial College estimated IFR was completely wrong. The UK, for example, has seen 42,000 deaths so far, which is 0.074% of population. The US has seen about 200,000 deaths 0.053%. Sweden, which did not lockdown down, has seen about 6,000 deaths, which is an infection fatality rate of 0.06%. All three countries are opening up and opening up. Whilst the ‘cases’ are rising and rising, the deaths continue to fall. They are, to all intents and purposes, flatlining.
    In Iceland it is around 0.16% and falling. In other words…
    Stop panicking – it’s over
    Whilst everyone is panicking about the ever-increasing number of cases, we should be celebrating them. They are demonstrating, very clearly, that COVID is far, far, less deadly then was feared. The Infection Fatality Rate is most likely going to end up around 0.1%, not 1%. https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/09/04/covid-why-terminology-really-matters/

  2. 2.

    Robert Sneddon

    September 17, 2020 at 11:23 am

    @dnfree: I know you’re not really wanting facts and reality in a reply to your “I’m just asking questions” screed but…

     

    The UK has had about 60,000 excess deaths over the past nine months, compared to the average for the same period over the past five years when COVID-19 was not present, so it’s practical to assign all those excess deaths to COVID-19 and its effects. The UK has had about 378,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with maybe another 400,000 asymptomatic cases that didn’t get confirmed. Call it a million cases total against 60,000 deaths, that a case fatality rate of 6%. That’s terrifying in its own way.

     

    Basically the waste of text you posted is an example of how to lie with statistics — you take the entire population of a country where the disease, thanks to unparalleled efforts in suppression has only infected a few percent and use that to calculate a total fatality rate. Riiiight.

     

    If nothing else the infection and the dying is continuing, in America and elsewhere around the world and it will continue all the way through this year and the next regardless of any vaccines that are mass-produced. The numbers you quoted in your duplicitous drive-by are only a snapshot of the early days of an ongoing disaster.

  3. 3.

    Sab

    September 17, 2020 at 11:27 am

    @Robert Sneddon: Also, even if you don’t actually die, you may well have very long term, very serious chronic health issues. Heart damage. Neurologocal problems. Lung damage.

  4. 4.

    dnfree

    September 17, 2020 at 11:46 am

    @Robert Sneddon: I think you have misinterpreted my “screed” as being from me rather than from a relative.  Yes, I am looking for facts, as is my usual habit.

    Edited to add that this relative has latched on to all of the recent claims that Covid is less severe, including the one from the “witch doctor” woman and the one that the CDC says only 6% of Covid deaths are actually from Covid, based on death certificates, which I went around and around with him about how death certificates work.  So if there’s an article or other reference that explains what you said, it would be helpful.  And I agree about the long-term damage, Sab.  I tried looking up this Malcolm Kendrick but couldn’t find much.

  5. 5.

    Brad F

    September 17, 2020 at 1:05 pm

    David

    How do the premiums vary for those two plans? As first reactions and choice architecture always in play, is their a dominated choice if one looks ONLY at what the monthly premium charges would be on the initial search page? Hypothetical–as I am assuming those two plans are from different states.

    Brad

  6. 6.

    David Anderson

    September 17, 2020 at 2:05 pm

    @Brad F: Premiums come into play, and you’re right the $0 deductible huge MOOP plans are from several different states and even more insurers.

    I think the broader point is that it is hard to say that there are many if any clearly dominated baseline plans as there is too much overlap in cost sharing designs.

  7. 7.

    Brad F

    September 17, 2020 at 2:21 pm

    @David Anderson: 

    MOOP?
    How does Medicare play into above.
    You were referring only to ACA exchanges, yes?

  8. 8.

    Sab

    September 17, 2020 at 4:08 pm

    @dnfree: I understood  that your comment was from a relative and not from you. I think it’s good for us to know that stuff is out there, because I personally cannot bring myself to my relatives like that anymore.

  9. 9.

    David Anderson

    September 17, 2020 at 4:49 pm

    @Brad F: Maximum out of pocket — and yes, these are only ACA plans.

  10. 10.

    ProfDamatu

    September 17, 2020 at 10:28 pm

    Insert here my usual comment that even that “low” MOOP of $4200 isn’t terribly feasible for a large chunk of the non-CSR people buying on the exchange. :-/

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • OzarkHillbilly on COVID-19 Coronavirus Updates: Monday / Tuesday, Feb. 6-7 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 9:00am)
  • Stacib on Late Night Open Thread: Elon Musk Is SAD! (Feb 7, 2023 @ 9:00am)
  • Geminid on Late Night Open Thread: Elon Musk Is SAD! (Feb 7, 2023 @ 9:00am)
  • artem1s on Late Night Open Thread: Elon Musk Is SAD! (Feb 7, 2023 @ 9:00am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Elon Musk Is SAD! (Feb 7, 2023 @ 8:59am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!