It’s always a good sign when you get back to the groomers and notice that every other animal is quiet in their cage and four grown ass men are attending to your cat:
Currently trying to appease the beast and sate his hunger for blood:
Wish me luck.
This post is in: Cat Blogging
It’s always a good sign when you get back to the groomers and notice that every other animal is quiet in their cage and four grown ass men are attending to your cat:
Currently trying to appease the beast and sate his hunger for blood:
Wish me luck.
This post is in: Criminal Justice, Excellent Links, Shitty Cops
Tonight, I’m thinking of Breonna Taylor’s family who is still grieving the loss of a daughter and sister.
We must never stop speaking Breonna’s name as we work to reform our justice system, including overhauling no-knock warrants.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 24, 2020
Radley Balko, at the Washington Post:
Wednesday’s announcement from Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron about criminal charges in the Breonna Taylor case set off a frenzy of misinformation on social media. Based on what we do know — which I’ve culled from my own reporting, reporting from the New York Times and the Louisville Courier-Journal, as well as from conversations with the lawyers for Taylor’s family — the decision to charge Detective Brett Hankison with wanton endangerment was probably correct, as was the decision not to charge the other officers involved in the shooting. If ballistics had conclusively shown that one of the bullets from Hankison’s gun killed Taylor, he could be charged with reckless homicide, but according to Cameron, the bullets that struck Taylor could not be matched to Hankison’s gun. There’s the problem that the police who conducted the raid were relying on a warrant procured by another officer, which was then signed by a judge. There were many flaws and abrogations in that process, but it would be unfair and not legal to hold them accountable for any of that.
But “not illegal” should not mean “immune from criticism.” Part of the problem was Cameron himself, who was selective in what information he released to the point of misleading the public about key facts in the case. (This raises real questions about whether the grand jury was also misled. That’s why an attorney for Taylor’s boyfriend Kenneth Walker, who fired at the police during the raid, is demanding that Cameron release the evidence that was presented to the grand jury.)
Furthermore, Taylor’s death was not, as Cameron suggested, simply a tragedy for which no one is to blame. The police work in this case was sloppy, and the warrant service was reckless. Taylor is dead because of a cascade of errors, bad judgment and dereliction of duty. And it’s important that the record on this be clear. So here are some correctives for the misinformation I’ve seen online…
“This is just an all-around tragedy. We shouldn’t focus on who to blame, whether its police, prosecutors, Walker or Taylor.”
The most serious questions here concern the investigation itself, and why these officers were asked to serve a warrant on Taylor’s home in the first place. There’s the lie about the postal inspector. There is the fact that despite the surveillance on Taylor’s home, the police didn’t know there was another person inside. There are the police bullets that were inadvertently fired into surrounding apartments. There’s the cut-and-paste language used to secure the no-knock portion of the warrant. There’s also the fact that the officer who procured the warrant was not part of the raid team. There’s the fact that five officers involved in the Taylor raid were involved in another violent, botched raid on an innocent family in 2018…
Excellent Link: “Correcting the misinformation about Breonna Taylor”Post + Comments (43)
by WaterGirl| 84 Comments
This post is in: 2020 Elections, Propositions, Initiatives, Amendments, Referendums, Vote Like Your Country Depends On It, This Fight Is For Everything
This is the second post for anyone who wants to talk California Propositions.
pacem appellant graciously agreed to share his views on the California propositions this year.
The intention is to provide a jumping off point for discussion, and a place for BJ folks to share their views, not to suggest to anyone how they should vote.
The 12 propositions are covered in 2 posts.
Friday’s post covered 14, 17-19, 21-23 and 25.
Today’s post covers 15, 16, 20 and 24.
California Peeps: Want to Talk Propositions? Prop 15, 16, 20 and 24Post + Comments (84)
by TaMara| 56 Comments
This post is in: 2020 Elections, Biden-Harris 2020, Kamala Harris 2020, Open Threads, Politics
It’s in these moments that our shared humanity and belief in our own power to bring about change guides us forward. That’s what I saw on the ground in Flint, Oakland Country, and Detroit earlier this week. pic.twitter.com/mayTcWJwG4
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 26, 2020
This is a good article.
.@KamalaHarris takes us back to 1992, a time when the music was better, her cooking was worse, and a job in the White House felt all but impossible.https://t.co/2iCaRoPmD7
— Bustle (@bustle) September 25, 2020
At a young age, I was told to look after my sister Maya. I’ve carried that with me throughout my life: a strong desire to look after and protect others who need support and help. pic.twitter.com/ghr2EVnXz5
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 25, 2020
I needed some Kamala goodness today.
There are recipes tonight!
Open thread
Open Thread: Lead, Follow Or Get Out Of Her WayPost + Comments (56)
This post is in: Open Threads
This post is in: Absent Friends, Activist Judges!, Civil Rights, Women's Rights
??MUST-WATCH??
Amy Klobuchar is on FIRE and did NOT come to play.???? pic.twitter.com/Poh8MVbDjF
— DeMarcus ?? (@semperdiced) September 24, 2020
Because these were too good not to share!
Ruth Bader Ginsburg chose, over and over again, not to let awful circumstances crush her determination to fight towards a better world. We owe her to keep that relentless determination alive, as best our individual circumstances permit.
Opinion: Justice Ginsburg leaves us our marching orders https://t.co/WiBOR2QIAY
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) September 25, 2020
… Ginsburg was arguably the most influential Jew in U.S. history (perhaps tied with Sandy Koufax for the most loved). Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt’s remarks at the ceremony centered on “tzedek, tzedek tirdof” — the phrase from Deuteronomy 16:20 meaning “justice, justice you shall pursue,” featured in an inscription on a piece of art in Ginsburg’s office. There are many rabbinical discussions on why the word “justice” is repeated, but my favorite — one certainly applicable to Ginsburg — is that you must pursue justice in a just way. Justice is not merely the result that matters, but the means by which you seek it. Ginsburg exemplified this idea by pursuing justice for all Americans, case by case, through the steady progress of the law. Might does not make right. It is through rational and creative thinking that justice is advanced. Justice does not come as a bolt from the blue, but as the result of tenacious, fierce, careful and inspired work.
This post is in: Biden-Harris 2020, NANCY SMASH!, Open Threads, Proud to Be A Democrat
The outcome of this election will determine the course of our country for generations. Everything from the Affordable Care Act, racial justice, equal rights, and environmental justice is on the ballot. 39 days. Let’s mobilize and give this everything we’ve got.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 25, 2020
In the middle of a global pandemic, President Trump is trying to get the U.S. Supreme Court to eliminate Obamacare and rip health care protections away from 100 million Americans with pre-existing conditions.
Don't forget that.
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) September 25, 2020
Saturday Morning Open Thread: The Good Fight ContinuesPost + Comments (132)
