• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Innocent people don’t delay justice.

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Don’t expect peaches from an apple tree.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

“I never thought they’d lock HIM up,” sobbed a distraught member of the Lock Her Up Party.

People are complicated. Love is not.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Spilling the end game before they can coat it in frankl luntz-approved dogwhistles.

Motto for the House: Flip 5 and lose none.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

Putin dreamed of ending NATO, and now it’s Finnish-ed.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

You cannot shame the shameless.

After roe, women are no longer free.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Federal spending on non-Elderly healthcare

Federal spending on non-Elderly healthcare

by David Anderson|  July 1, 202212:53 pm| 7 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

The federal government spends almost a trillion dollars per year on non-elderly healthcare. The Congressional Budget Office released a new report that breaks this spending down for 2022 and projects what it will look like in 2032.

Congressional Budget Office estimate of US federal direct and tax expenditures for non-elderly healthcare 2022-2032. ESI, Medicaid/CHIP are dominant amounts, with ESI increasing as percentage of GDP over time. Medicare and ACA related programs remain a much smaller fraction of federal spending and stay roughly constant over time.

The big story is that the tax exclusion for employer sponsored health insurance is big and growing as a percentage of GDP. These tax expenditures are regressive as higher income folks get bigger tax breaks and likely contributes to increasing medical cost spend growth as this segment of the US healthcare ecosystem has the worst ability to actually negotiate prices.

It is also a nasty political problem to control or reduce. The ACA attempted to slow the growth of this tax expenditure by the Cadillac tax. The Cadillac tax was an excise tax on the increment of premiums that were above a fairly high threshold. The objective was to shift people out of super broad network plans that had no incentive or means to say no, into plans that would at least occassionally say no. The target plans were often the $40,000 per year Goldman Sachs paid for senior executive health insurance in 2009. It also would have hit union plans pretty hard.

It failed. No one, besides a few health and tax economists, loved the policy. Congress kept on voting to extend the start date before finally killing it.

The GOP has the idea of ICHRA, individual contribution health savings accounts, that will sort of chip away at the value of this exclusion by the creation of an annual defined contribution lump sum payment that will encourage people to buy cheaper plans instead of what is offered by their Human Resources Department. The CBO thinks ICHRA will be a small sliver of US health coverage with 2 million people covered in 2032.

The ESI tax exclusion is a huge subsidy to middle and upper class families that no one recognizes that they are getting right now. It distorts our labor and healthcare markets at a significant direct and likely larger indirect costs. And it is only going to get bigger over time.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Still Busy TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Still Busy
Next Post: Women’s Rights Are Human Rights Open Thread: If Only We’d Listened… Women's Rights Are Human Rights Open Thread:  If Only We'd Listened... 6»

Reader Interactions

7Comments

  1. 1.

    Ohio Mom

    July 1, 2022 at 9:40 am

    Now I am trying to imagine what’s included in a $40,000 a year plan. Obviously, it’s all free, must certainly include plastic surgery and all sorts of skin treatments that typical plans exclude. Gotta keep those trophy wives worthy of trophies.

    Ironic that something could exist — the proposal for the Cadillac tax — that could unite unions and the fattest of the fat cats. Well maybe there are also trade policie they agree on.

  2. 2.

    Jake Gibson

    July 1, 2022 at 9:40 am

    My only consolation is that AGW will break down systems enough that immediate survival will take precedence over such mundane concerns.

    Shorter: We’re fucked and getting more fucked.

  3. 3.

    Ohio Mom

    July 1, 2022 at 9:44 am

    @Jake Gibson: And maybe World War III will break out in earnest, instead of just this Ukraine-Russia proxy tussle, and we’ll be nuclear-bombed back into cave people times. Geesh.

  4. 4.

    catotheodg

    July 1, 2022 at 9:49 am

  5. 5.

    catothedog

    July 1, 2022 at 9:51 am

    The politics of this applies not just to healthcare.  The mix of taxation & means testing has produces an inhospitable  political milieu for public policy. The top 20% pays a most of  the taxes but get nothing in return for it.

    E.g. They pay full price for college, get no deductions for tuition,  and so on.

    In terms of progressive policy, this is right. The well off should pay more. But in terms of politics this is absolutely bad. There is a sizable bock of people who  get taxed a decent chunk  and then full pay “full price” for everything.  This is a politically active block, and it is easy to sell them the idea that ” taxation is theft” .

    The idea that your employer sponsored medical insurance premium is taxable income is in the same class. They end up paying tax on this,  and at the same time, pay full price for the premium, while the less well-off gets a subsidy for medical insurance.

    Means tested benefits and subsidies is just politically terrible for progressive policy. It is poison to the idea of solidarity and public good. It creates “makers and takers”  and similar kinds of bad narratives for selling good public policy

    Just raise the damn  income tax rates and make stuff free/same price for everyone.  This will increase the political base for progressive public policy.

    The top 1-2% will never line up for good public policy. But there is no need to piss of the winnable chunk of the 20% by  bad implementation of policy

  6. 6.

    catothedog

    July 1, 2022 at 10:03 am

    The politics of this applies not just to healthcare.  The mix of taxation & means testing has produced an inhospitable  political milieu for public policy. The top 20% pays most of  the taxes but get nothing in return for it (as they see it)

    E.g. They pay full price for college, get no deductions for tuition,  and so on.

    In terms of progressive policy, this is right. The well off should pay more. But in terms of politics this is absolutely bad. There is a sizable bock of people who  get taxed a decent chunk  and then full pay “full price” for everything.  This is a politically active block, and it is easy to sell them the idea that ” taxation is theft” .

    The idea that your employer sponsored medical insurance premium is taxable income is in the same class. They end up paying tax on this,  and also paying full price for the premium, while the less well-off get a subsidy for medical insurance.

    Means tested benefits and subsidies is just politically terrible for progressive policy. It is poison to the idea of solidarity and public good. It creates “makers and takers”  and similar kinds of bad narratives against good public policy

    Just raise the damn  income tax rates and make stuff free/same price for everyone.  This will increase the political base for progressive public policy.

    The top 1-2% will never line up for good public policy. But there is no need to piss of the winnable chunk of the 20% by  bad implementation of policy

  7. 7.

    gene108

    July 1, 2022 at 10:22 am

    @Ohio Mom: 

    Now I am trying to imagine what’s included in a $40,000 a year plan.

    I can’t picture what’s included that would actually be enough to influence overall healthcare costs.

    Most relatively healthy people don’t use the healthcare system much, from my anecdotal experience.

    Even using healthcare services for something like skin treatments at a dermatologists office can’t be that expensive versus immunosuppressive drugs for people with organ transplants.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • bbleh on Memorial Day Monday Morning Open Thread (May 29, 2023 @ 12:26pm)
  • Captain C on Memorial Day Monday Morning Open Thread (May 29, 2023 @ 12:26pm)
  • gene108 on Memorial Day Monday Morning Open Thread (May 29, 2023 @ 12:25pm)
  • trollhattan on Memorial Day Monday Morning Open Thread (May 29, 2023 @ 12:20pm)
  • Geminid on Memorial Day Monday Morning Open Thread (May 29, 2023 @ 12:17pm)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!