• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Fear or fury? The choice is ours.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

If you voted for Trump, you don’t get to speak about ethics, morals, or rule of law.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

This is dead girl, live boy, a goat, two wetsuits and a dildo territory.  oh, and pink furry handcuffs.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

People really shouldn’t expect the government to help after they watched the GOP drown it in a bathtub.

Everybody saw this coming.

The willow is too close to the house.

Donald Trump found guilty as fuck – May 30, 2024!

Following reporting rules is only for the little people, apparently.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Hey Washington Post, “Democracy Dies in Darkness” was supposed to be a warning, not a mission statement.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / ACA subsidies in reconciliation?

ACA subsidies in reconciliation?

by David Anderson|  July 6, 20222:11 pm| 8 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance, Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

The Democratic caucus in the Senate is slowly moving forward again on a reconciliation bill that is mostly a tax and climate bill with some healthcare components. Here is the current status:

NEW on reconciliation, w/ @sahilkapur:

-Negotiations on $500b spending, $1T revenue

-Expected $300b “ceiling” on energy/climate section

-Manchin looking at options for lower-cost ACA subsidies that could fill the rest, no commitments yet. https://t.co/psOYSaFWa1

— Benjy Sarlin (@BenjySarlin) July 6, 2022

 

The ACA has received buffed up subsidies to reduce premiums through the end of 2022. There is no current income limit instead of the 400% Federal Poverty Level cap that was law from 2014-2021 and is current law for 2023 and beyond. There is also a reduction in premium contributions at all income levels. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that a ten year extension of the ARPA subsidies as currently written would cost $210 billion or just slightly more than the remaining spending space left over from any climate portion.

There are a lot of policy priorities that liberals want and using the entire slot for one policy is likely to piss off a lot of people in the coalition. Are there ways to get most of the funding for ARPA subsidies while still keeping some funds for other priorities?

Yes.

Andrew Sprung and Charles Gaba both argue that Congress could fund most if not all of the ARPA subsidies by appropriating CSR funding for silver plans. This would turn off silverloading which has inflated the benchmark premium since 2018 and led to far more zero premium plans and higher value plans at reasonable prices since then. The CBO estimated that appropriating CSR funding would save the federal government just under $200 billion dollars over a decade. Trading Silverloading for ARPA subsidy extensions is trading an expensive, effective and inefficienctly targeted subsidy system for a more targeted subsidy system. In terms of federal budgeting the total cost delta between these two policies is a rounding error. It is a plausible but highly technocratic path forward.

There are other plausible paths to get most of ARPA, keep silverloading and free up resources. Currently, there are two sets of people who receive ARPA premium subsidies.  Individuals earning between 100% to 400% FPL get their ACA level subsidies and then have those increased.  Most notably the population earning under 150% FPL now see $0 silver benchmark plans in most cases where the deductible is less than $500.  The second population are people who are newly subsidized as they earn over 400% FPL and previously were not eligible for subsidies.  These individuals now are guaranteed a benchmark silver plan for 8.5% of their income.  It is likely that a significant chunk of the expense of the over 400% FPL subsidies are heavily concentrated.

There are spaces to tweak the formula here.  Below is a proposed tweak that keeps zero premium prevalence high for low income individuals and provides some top end protection for all people to account for the edge cases of a pair of 64 year olds with 25 year old triplets in rural Wyoming facing massively expensive premiums.  (I’m using a 2021 Brookings table for 2021 current law moved forward two years for 2023 current law estimates- — I’m off by a little bit)

 

ARPA 2021-2022 2023 Current Law & ACA Proposed
FPL Band
100-138 0% 2.07% 0
138-150 0% 3.1% to 4.14% 0
150-200 0% to 2% 4.14% to 6.52% 1% to 3%
200-250 2% to 4% 6.53% to 8.33% 3% to 5.25%
250-300 4% to 6% 8.33%-9.83% 5.25% to 7.5%
300-400 6% to 8.5% 9.83% 7.5% to 10%
400+ 8.50% No Subsidy 10% to 15%
1000+ 8.50% No Subsidy 15%

 

This proposed table would still provide zero premium plans to low income buyers and give top end cover for outlier situations well through the upper middle class to upper class who live in very rural areas. It would also cost significantly less than $200 billion dollars, thus freeing up other policy space for other priorities.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: «Wednesday Morning Open Thread: 'We've Got to Be Smarter' 2 Wednesday Morning Open Thread: ‘We’ve Got to Be Smarter’
Next Post: Sweet Dreams (Aren’t Made of This) »

Reader Interactions

8Comments

  1. 1.

    rikyrah

    July 6, 2022 at 10:21 am

    Can they change the Medicare Age in reconciliation?

     

    How about adding vision, dental and hearing to Medicare in reconciliation?

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    July 6, 2022 at 10:33 am

    @rikyrah:

    1. Maybe — Medicare age eligibility has huge tax and spend implications which gets it into the reconciliation budget rule set.  However, it is also a massive policy change that the Senate Parliamentarian may rule it to be a policy change instead of a revenue/expenditure change and thus out of order.  Finally, in order to make it stick, the entire reconciliation bill has to be budget neutral or budget deficit reducing after 10 years, so there may be a window/turn-off switch here… which is great for researchers and bad for enrollees.
    2. Vision-Dental benefits can be added in reconciliation but are hyper expensive.
  3. 3.

    PaulB

    July 6, 2022 at 10:38 am

    As a new retiree who won’t be eligible for Medicare for another two years and who is just above the 400% line and formerly ineligible for a subsidy, I have to say that getting a subsidy now has been a real godsend. That said, I’d hate for it to be the one thing that they’d get from a new bill.

    Damn Joe Manchin and his unreasonable demands, none of which are based on science or sound economics. It’s both bad policy and bad politics. Thanks for providing some alternatives. I hope someone in the government is listening.

  4. 4.

    NorthLeft

    July 6, 2022 at 11:14 am

    All hail his majesty, Senator Manchin the first!

    It is sickening to read these things and how he is treated by the media. This needs to be fixed…..and no, I am not really sure what I mean by that.

  5. 5.

    StringOnAStick

    July 6, 2022 at 11:17 am

    Both my spouse and I will hit 65 within the next 12months and are early retirees living in savings with an ACA policy for each of us.  It looks like we’re who just squeak under the line but I really feel for those who are going to get caught in all this.

    All my adult years I felt like reaching Medicare age would be like finally being able to breathe a sigh of relief, and then the ACA ruled you couldn’t be rejected or outrageously charged for a pre existing condition, so that helped a lot.  Now I worry that Rick Scott and his R buddies are going to end Medicare and Social Security just when my husband and I cross the eligibility line.  Thanks, repukes!

  6. 6.

    Shane

    July 6, 2022 at 12:16 pm

    In my classes, I tell my students that the marketplace subsidies are a backdoor privatized Medicaid expansion, because they allow people in non-Medicaid expansion states who would qualify for Medicaid expansion if their state adopted it to buy fully or nearly fully subsidized private insurance of similar quality to Medicaid. I’d be very happy if I can keep teaching this in the future.

  7. 7.

    lowtechcyclist

    July 6, 2022 at 12:36 pm

    One thing that should be in the reconciliation bill is pre-funding the DOJ, and the coup/insurrection investigation in particular, through the end of Biden’s first term. I want them to have the time to do it right.

  8. 8.

    David Anderson

    July 6, 2022 at 1:17 pm

    @Shane: If you have a chance, read Allen et al

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774583

    on that thought — more importantly, it is a very limited, and expensive Medicaid expansion as the <100% FPLers don’t get anything.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - way2blue - SINALEI, SAMOA—RESPITE EDITION—FEBRUARY 2025.  (second of five) 7
Image by way2blue (7/13/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Gloria DryGarden on Medium Cool – Navel Gazing! (Jul 13, 2025 @ 10:33pm)
  • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Medium Cool – Navel Gazing! (Jul 13, 2025 @ 10:32pm)
  • prostratedragon on Sunday Night Open Thread (Jul 13, 2025 @ 10:31pm)
  • Miki on Medium Cool – Navel Gazing! (Jul 13, 2025 @ 10:30pm)
  • Gloria DryGarden on Medium Cool – Navel Gazing! (Jul 13, 2025 @ 10:28pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!