• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

These are not very smart people, and things got out of hand.

“woke” is the new caravan.

There is no compromise when it comes to body autonomy. You either have it or you do not.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

I really should read my own blog.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

75% of people clapping liked the show!

The current Supreme Court is a dangerous, rogue court.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

Today in our ongoing national embarrassment…

They don’t have outfits that big. nor codpieces that small.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

I might just take the rest of the day off and do even more nothing than usual.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Bad people in a position to do bad things will do bad things because they are bad people. End of story.

All hail the time of the bunny!

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Silverloading and Texas

Silverloading and Texas

by David Anderson|  November 1, 20229:56 am| 8 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Last week, I noted that Gold plans are priced well below comparable Silver plans in Houston.   This is a result of silverloading and a change in state policy.

Silverloading is the practice, common since 2018, of insurers putting the incremental cost of Cost-Sharing Reduction (CSR) benefits into premiums.  CSR benefits reduce deductibles and cost-sharing for low income (<250% Federal Poverty Level(FPL)) buyers who purchase silver plans.  Silver plans typically have an average actuarial value(AV) of 70% AV which means insurers pay about 70% of the group’s expected claims and individuals in the form of deductibles, co-pays and co-insurance pay the other 30%.  CSR ups the AV to 87% (151-200% FPL) or 94% (100-150% FPL).

In October 2017, the payment pathway for CSR benefits changed.  CSR benefit payment  had previously been routed behind the scenes on a reimbursement and reconciliation basis.  That path stopped.  Instead, insurers placed the incremental cost of the benefits that they were still required to offer into silver premiums.  There was a lot of variation on how insurers did this.

Most insurers estimated their own incremental cost of the benefit and added that cost into the premium of their silver plans.  The incremental cost of the benefit is a combination of unit pricing and the health characteristics of the enrolled population.    Some health insurers attract mostly healthy people who don’t use much if any healthcare.  Other health insurers attract people who are more ill and will use more of their CSR benefits.  Pricing off of their own experience leads to significant variation in the size of the silverload for different insurers in the same market.  Furthermore, low income enrollees use healthcare differently than higher income enrollees (paper forthcoming with some great co-authors on one aspect of this differential utilization :) ).  This differential healthcare utilization by income gradient also implies that the risk adjustment formula needs to be precisely calibarated or it is likely to be wrong in how it shifts money between metal levels.

Silver plans sold on Healthcare.gov have an AV that is a little bit of 70%  plans + a few 73% AV plans (201-250% FPL) + a lot of 87% AV plans + (even more 94% AV plans (non-Medicaid Expansion states) OR  + a lot of 94% AV plans (Medicaid Expansion states)

These factors have frequently led to a situation where Silver plans with a blended AV in the high 80s having premiums lower than gold plans with AVs in the high 70s or low 80s.  This is weird!

Texas had previously allowed this type of pricing to happen.  For the 2023 plan year, a new state law is in effect.  It says that silver plans must be priced pretty damn close to their actual actuarial value.  It is not quite there as a there is a common multiplier instead of a single risk pool requirement but that is an argument for actuaries and no one else.  This has led to gold plans from the same insurer to be priced well below silver plans.

Other states, like New Mexico, have previously adopted this type of regulation.  There are concerns that without fixing risk adjustment, some products, including Bronze plans, won’t be profitable. In Texas, one large insurer stopped selling Bronze plans for 2023.  But if the risk adjustment works out, this policy change makes plans far more functional and useful for individuals earning over 200% FPL.

 

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Good Example vs. Cautionary Tale (Open Thread)
Next Post: Just One Week Left For Us To Impact the Outcome! Within the Margin of Effort – Another Match for Boots On the Ground in AZ 15»

Reader Interactions

8Comments

  1. 1.

    Frank Wilhoit

    November 1, 2022 at 10:05 am

    David, in your fifth graf, do you have “silver” and “gold” transposed?

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    November 1, 2022 at 10:14 am

    @Frank Wilhoit: It is correct, I added an explanatory paragraph to explain that this is weird and why it is weird.

  3. 3.

    Frank Wilhoit

    November 1, 2022 at 10:25 am

    @David Anderson: It is a good lookout that this is your field and not mine.  And even so, do I not recall you saying once that even you do not understand subrogation?  ;-)

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    November 1, 2022 at 10:40 am

    @Frank Wilhoit: Subrogation is dark and arcane arts and magicks

  5. 5.

    There go two miscreants

    November 1, 2022 at 11:58 am

    Somewhere in the great beyond, Rube Goldberg is envious!

  6. 6.

    lee

    November 1, 2022 at 1:03 pm

    What a timely post. My daughter aged off our health insurance and now has to get something on the Marketplace and we live it Texas!!

    She qualifies for subsidies (she doesn’t make much). So I guess the best for her would be Gold plans.

  7. 7.

    Greg Fann

    November 1, 2022 at 2:55 pm

    @lee: If projected income is above 200% of FPL, gold is likely the best choice. If below 200%, silver may be better.

  8. 8.

    David Anderson

    November 1, 2022 at 7:30 pm

    @lee: IF she makes under 200% FPL, a little more premium buys a lot less cost-sharing for a CSR Silver — this is doubly true if she is making under 150% FPL (~20K-ish if she is on her own).

    Over 200% FPL, Gold is probably a better deal than Silver as lower premium and likely less cost-sharing at any level of consumption except hit by a meteor/cancer diagnosis than cost-sharing is the same.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Winter Wren - Point Lobos State Natural Reserve 3
Image by Winter Wren (7/31/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • WTFGhost on GOP Venality Open Thread: May Van Orden Be the First of Many Defections… (Jul 10, 2025 @ 3:23pm)
  • Baud on Justice Brown Jackson Will Not Be Silenced (Jul 10, 2025 @ 3:22pm)
  • Archon on Justice Brown Jackson Will Not Be Silenced (Jul 10, 2025 @ 3:16pm)
  • Formerly disgruntled in Oregon on Justice Brown Jackson Will Not Be Silenced (Jul 10, 2025 @ 3:15pm)
  • Trollhattan on Justice Brown Jackson Will Not Be Silenced (Jul 10, 2025 @ 3:11pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!