• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Comment
  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

People are complicated. Love is not.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

A dilettante blog from the great progressive state of West Virginia.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

You cannot shame the shameless.

The revolution will be supervised.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

We are aware of all internet traditions.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

After roe, women are no longer free.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

All your base are belong to Tunch.

No one could have predicted…

Let there be snark.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Democratic Politics / Leader Hakeem vs. ‘Squeaker’ McCarthy, Part 2

Leader Hakeem vs. ‘Squeaker’ McCarthy, Part 2

by WaterGirl|  January 9, 20231:30 pm| 114 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Politics, Open Threads, Politics, Republican Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Look at these photos.

Leader Jeffries vs. ‘Squeaker’ McCarthy, Part 2 1  Leader Jeffries vs. ‘Squeaker’ McCarthy, Part 2 2
If you just look at the faces, with no context, the first guy looks like he might be constipated, but the guy on the right seems happy enough.

In the full picture, I see a very gracious man handing over the symbol of power, and another guy saying “gimme that!”

Leader Jeffries vs. ‘Squeaker’ McCarthy, Part 2

Leader Jeffries:

As Democrats we do believe in a country for everyone….
We believe that in America, our diversity is a strength.
It is not a weakness.
It is an economic strength. A competitive strength. A cultural strength.
Our diversity is a strength.
It is not a weakness.

We are a gorgeous mosaic of people from throughout the world. As John Lewis would sometimes remind us on this floor, we may have come over on different ships. But we’re all in the same boat now.

We are white.
We are black.
We are Latino.
We are Asian.
We Are Native American.

We are Christian.
We are Jewish.
We are Hindu.
We are religious.
We are secular.

We are gay.
We are straight.
We are young.
We are older.

We are women.
We are men.

We are citizens.
We are dreamers.

Out of many, we are one.
That’s what makes America a great country.

Squeaker McCarthy:

Okay, I confess.

I couldn’t listen to McCarthy.

If someone did listen and wants to share a short summary in the comments, I can add it to the post.

This week will certainly tell us a lot – a lot about the rules themselves, a lot about whether republicans will vote in lock step, a lot about what we can expect to see from the various factions in the republican party.  Can they get rules passed?  Will the rules be passed as a package, take it or leave it?  Or will there be votes on the rules, one by one?

Might we see a repeat of sorts of the 15 votes for Squeaker?

Thoughts and predictions?  It would be irresponsible not to speculate!

For my money, I think the big fight will be related to committee chairs – isn’t that what the (near) fisticuffs was about on Friday night?   I think the political terrorists do not get their promised positions as chairs, and then because of that they set the whole thing on fire.  I don’t always have to be right, but please please let me be right on this.

Open thread.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Jack Smith, the Other Jack Smith, and Fulton County
Next Post: Where’s Perla when you need her? »

Reader Interactions

  • Commenters
  • Filtered
  • Settings

Commenters

No commenters available.

  • Another Scott
  • Anyway
  • artem1s
  • Baud
  • bbleh
  • Brachiator
  • brendancalling
  • cain
  • CaseyL
  • Dan B
  • David Crisp
  • dexwood
  • Elizabelle
  • FelonyGovt
  • Fraud Guy
  • Geminid
  • Geoduck
  • glc
  • HinTN
  • HumboldtBlue
  • ian
  • JCJ
  • jeffreyw
  • Jim, Foolish Literalist
  • karen marie
  • Kelly
  • Ken
  • Kent
  • kindness
  • leeleeFL
  • lowtechcyclist
  • M31
  • Marleedog
  • Matt McIrvin
  • MattF
  • MazeDancer
  • NotMax
  • Omnes Omnibus
  • piratedan
  • PJ
  • Qrop Non Sequitur
  • randy khan)
  • rikyrah
  • sab
  • SpaceUnit
  • Splitting Image
  • Sure Lurkalot
  • The Golux
  • The Lodger
  • Tim Ellis
  • TriassicSands
  • trollhattan
  • WaterGirl
  • West of the Rockies
  • WV Blondie

Filtered Commenters

No filtered commenters available.

    Settings




    Settings are saved immediately; press X to close the box.

    114Comments

    1. 1.

      cain

      January 9, 2023 at 1:33 pm

      Cool to mention Hindus, although there are more Muslims than Hindus in this country. But hey, great to feel seen!

      Reply
    2. 2.

      MazeDancer

      January 9, 2023 at 1:35 pm

      Love that shot of Mt. Jeffries handing the gavel down to a lesser being.

      Nancy Smash: Take that, SINO.

      Reply
    3. 3.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 1:36 pm

      @MazeDancer: SINO?

      Reply
    4. 4.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 1:37 pm

      Sincerely hoping for a clusterfuck for Squeaker McCarthy as they vote on rules.

      Reply
    5. 5.

      MattF

      January 9, 2023 at 1:39 pm

      Squeaker McCarthy inspires contempt from everyone (Bret Stephens):

      A few honorable exceptions aside, the G.O.P. is basically split between reptiles and invertebrates. McCarthy is the ultimate invertebrate. He went to Mar-a-Lago just a short while after Jan. 6 to kiss the ring of the guy who incited the mob that, by McCarthy’s own admission, wanted to kill him. He hated Liz Cheney because of her backbone. But he quailed before Marjorie Taylor Greene because she has a forked tongue. He gave away the powers and prerogatives of the office of speaker in order to gain the office, which is like a slug abandoning its shell and thinking it won’t be stepped on.

      Reply
    6. 6.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 1:40 pm

      Someone posted on Twitter a really good montage of photos from Saturday night. They show Jeffries and Pelosi sitting together in the House Chamber and chatting.

      They seemed to be having fun.

      Reply
    7. 7.

      Marleedog

      January 9, 2023 at 1:40 pm

      @WaterGirl:

       

      Squeaker in Name Only

      Reply
    8. 8.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 1:44 pm

      @Marleedog: Got it!  thanks

      Reply
    9. 9.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 1:44 pm

      @Geminid: I would love to see those!

      Reply
    10. 10.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 1:45 pm

      @MattF:

      He gave away the powers and prerogatives of the office of speaker in order to gain the office, which is like a slug abandoning its shell and thinking it won’t be stepped on.

      Alas, too long for a rotating tag.

      Reply
    11. 11.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 1:48 pm

      I think the Rules will be voted on as a package. If enough Republicans balk, leadership might huddle with them and then amend the objectionable rule.

      McCarthy and his team have had since Sunday morning to sell the rules package to members, and it will very likely pass. I would not be surprised if enough members vote “no” on the first and maybe second ballots to hold things up a bit, just to fire a shot across the Freedom Caucus’s bow.

      Reply
    12. 12.

      HinTN

      January 9, 2023 at 1:48 pm

      @WaterGirl: A great tag would be,  “Squeaker in name only”

      😁

      Reply
    13. 13.

      Brachiator

      January 9, 2023 at 1:50 pm

      For my money, I think the big fight will be related to committee chairs – isn’t that what the (near) fisticuffs was about on Friday night?

      I didn’t watch them, but I suppose there was speculation on the Sunday pundit shows.

      I don’t know what these people might do. I only know that it will be stupid and mean spirited.

      Reply
    14. 14.

      HumboldtBlue

      January 9, 2023 at 1:50 pm

      If you ever wish to access the materials and evidence gathered by the Jan 6 committee, here’s the website.

      Reply
    15. 15.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 1:51 pm

      @WaterGirl: I will try to hunt them up. I think they were retweeted by New Republic correspondent Grace Segers.

      Reply
    16. 16.

      Tim Ellis

      January 9, 2023 at 1:51 pm

      I didn’t know much about Jeffries before but man he really impressed me. Nancy Pelosi is a tough act to follow, but he seems up to the task. He also seems to recognize the gravity of the moment for democracy in the US, which is important to me, so that’s reassuring. Taken with the show of total unity from Dems throughout the fiasco of McCarthy’s 15 votes, and I feel very confident the House caucus is ready to roll.

      Also makes me a little miffed that I left NY state because wow do the  NY Dems need a shakeup lol. Can’t believe they blew the House for us. New York! The mega-blue state! Embarrassing.

      Reply
    17. 17.

      HumboldtBlue

      January 9, 2023 at 1:56 pm

      And here’s a second site with the Jan 6 materials as well.

      Reply
    18. 18.

      Matt McIrvin

      January 9, 2023 at 2:02 pm

      @Tim Ellis: I keep thinking back to the New York Times talking about how the red wave would lead to Republican gains deep in blue territory. No, it’s not all deep blue territory, it’s just YOU.

      Reply
    19. 19.

      West of the Rockies

      January 9, 2023 at 2:05 pm

      I watched only a couple minutes of McCarthy speaking.  He opened with a bit of, I think, humility and humor, or at least was better than I expected.   Where it went from there I don’t know.

      Reply
    20. 20.

      Jim, Foolish Literalist

      January 9, 2023 at 2:13 pm

      @Matt McIrvin: I’m not an expert in NYS politics, much less media consumption, but I’d be willing to bet that in those areas where Republicans made advances, and where Eric Adams was stronger than Wiley and Garcia, the Post has greater influence than the Times.

      Reply
    21. 21.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:14 pm

      @HinTN: We already have this tag:  “Squeaker” McCarthy

      I will have to think about whether we want another one that’s similar.

      Reply
    22. 22.

      PJ

      January 9, 2023 at 2:14 pm

      @Tim Ellis: If you lived in New York, you know it is not a “mega-blue state”.  40% of the voters chose Trump in 2020.  Upstate and Long Island are mostly Republican.  Billionaire Ronald Lauder funded a lawsuit to erase the districts which the Democrats drew up in redistricting, and then the Republican judge appointed a Republican to draw the new districts.  There is no Democratic “machine” in New York to get out voters.  Results should not be surprising.

      Reply
    23. 23.

      brendancalling

      January 9, 2023 at 2:16 pm

      @MattF: weird to see Brett Stephens, who flipped out after being compared to a bedbug and tried to get the guy who called him that fired, comparing the GOP to reptiles and insects. Someone should remind him it’s not nice to call names.

      Reply
    24. 24.

      Jim, Foolish Literalist

      January 9, 2023 at 2:17 pm

      @PJ: So old I remember when Chuck Schumer cited “The Baileys”– a middle-class two-income household in Massapequa– as his political North Star, and Kirsten Gillibrand bragged about the shotguns she and her husband kept under their bed.

      Reply
    25. 25.

      SpaceUnit

      January 9, 2023 at 2:17 pm

      When I was a kid a squeaker meant a little high-pitched fart.

      And so it’s spot on here.

      Reply
    26. 26.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:20 pm

      @Tim Ellis: Agree on all points!

      Reply
    27. 27.

      kindness

      January 9, 2023 at 2:22 pm

      Is MTG going to get the coveted House Un-American Activities chair?  (/s)

      Reply
    28. 28.

      Kent

      January 9, 2023 at 2:22 pm

      @Geminid:

      I think the Rules will be voted on as a package. If enough Republicans balk, leadership might huddle with them and then amend the objectionable rule.

      McCarthy and his team have had since Sunday morning to sell the rules package to members, and it will very likely pass. I would not be surprised if enough members vote “no” on the first and maybe second ballots to hold things up a bit, just to fire a shot across the Freedom Caucus’s bow.

      The GOP never had the slightest intention of operating a functional legislative body in the House over the next two years.  All they had planned was dysfunction.  So I don’t think it makes a tinker’s dam worth of difference what the rules are.  And whether it is say Jim Jordan or Matt  Gaetz that is running whatever latest hearing they plan on Hunter Biden or Dr. Fauci or “wokeness”   All they are really fighting over is which GOP assholes are going to get the most TV time over the next two years and by extension the most air time on FOX

      That is all this is about.  The Freedom Caucus a-holes are just trying to jump the line.  Let them eat their own.  Who cares.

      Reply
    29. 29.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:23 pm

      @PJ: Why is there no Democratic machine in New York????

      Reply
    30. 30.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:23 pm

      @SpaceUnit: It works either way!

      Reply
    31. 31.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 2:24 pm

      @Geminid:

      @WaterGirl: I remembered that I forwarded the pictures of Jeffries and Pelosi to a friend so I retrieved the link. It was @Cheryllyne512 rreplying to @PettyLupone.  So here goes:

      Link

      Reply
    32. 32.

      Kent

      January 9, 2023 at 2:25 pm

      @WaterGirl: Because NY Democrats from Cuomo to the present haven’t prioritized it.    To the contrary.

      Reply
    33. 33.

      Fraud Guy

      January 9, 2023 at 2:27 pm

      From your keyboard to gods’ eyes

      Reply
    34. 34.

      WV Blondie

      January 9, 2023 at 2:27 pm

      @WaterGirl: Can you amend the tag to “Squeaker” McCarthy, SINO!

      Reply
    35. 35.

      jeffreyw

      January 9, 2023 at 2:28 pm

      Weren't McCarthy and the Republicans claiming they would bring in a more transparent Congress and heighten accountability? Of course, that was bunk. So now we have secret rules? https://t.co/HMbwHqmdnO— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) January 9, 2023

      Reply
    36. 36.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:31 pm

      @Geminid: Thank you!

      Reply
    37. 37.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:31 pm

      @Kent: Well, I hope that changes now.

      Reply
    38. 38.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:33 pm

      @jeffreyw:  Wow.

      Are the Dems in the House able to see the secret rules?  If not, that’s nuts.

      Reply
    39. 39.

      Geoduck

      January 9, 2023 at 2:35 pm

      @MattF: A minor point, but as a resident of the Pacific Northwest, slugs never have shells. Probably was thinking of snails.

      Reply
    40. 40.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 2:35 pm

      @Kent: I think it might make a difference what the rules are, especially the one regarding removal of the Speaker.

      Anyway, I am a curious person and the dynamics of this caucus interest me, just like the dynamics of Virginia’s state Republican party interest me.

      And I am pursuing an anthroplogy project. I’ve been impressed by how the proposition, “Latinos are not a monolith!” has become accepted doctrine here. So I am researching the question, “Are Republicans a monolith?” Preliminary findings could be shocking!

      Reply
    41. 41.

      Baud

      January 9, 2023 at 2:36 pm

      @Geminid:

      I am a monolith!

      Reply
    42. 42.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 2:37 pm

      @WaterGirl: If you feel like using your frontpager superpowers to post that tweet, more people would see the pictures!

      Reply
    43. 43.

      artem1s

      January 9, 2023 at 2:38 pm

      Might we see a repeat of sorts of the 15 votes for Squeaker?

      While I was watching the never-ending gobstopper of Squeaker votes last week, it occurred to me the GOP House members are so out of practice they all needed a primer on how to vote to secure a majority. And even then one of the performance artists among them couldn’t remember whether to vote Y or P, resulting in R-(forgot to bring his cane) Mike Rogers nearly losing his shit on Gaetz.
      I wonder how many of these douche-nozzles think they get 15 do-overs for bill votes? I’m thinking at minimum Boebert will try voting present on some critical bill McCarthy wants passed just because she thinks it’s cute.

      Reply
    44. 44.

      Anyway

      January 9, 2023 at 2:39 pm

      @Geoduck:

      Ha! A recent crossword clue (somewhere) was “shell-less mollusk”…

      Reply
    45. 45.

      Sure Lurkalot

      January 9, 2023 at 2:40 pm

      @HumboldtBlue:

      Here’s another resource for January 6th committee materials…private, non-governmental….just in case.

      https://www.justsecurity.org/77022/january-6-clearinghouse/

      Reply
    46. 46.

      piratedan

      January 9, 2023 at 2:41 pm

      I believe that one of the asks of SINO was that he cede control of the gavel on multiple committees to HFC members, one of which was supposedly the Armed Forces Committee (which is where the Ukraine battles will be fought) and in doing so, they move ahead of the queue to control those agendas.  What will likely rankle is that you have members that have been serving say 14-30 years waiting their turn to hold a gavel and now, McCarthy has denied that to a certain old guard that had been waiting their turn.  Its unknown how deep that would cut, or who it would cut, if true.  It’s not as if these guys have any trouble banking their ambition for the greater good…. :-)

      Reply
    47. 47.

      Omnes Omnibus

      January 9, 2023 at 2:42 pm

      @Baud: You are more of a plinth.

      Reply
    48. 48.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:43 pm

      @Geminid: I agree.  This thread isn’t exactly red hot, so I figured I would save those for a new thread tomorrow or later this week.

      If there’s interest, I was thinking I might do a post at the end of very week:

      Leader Hakeem vs. Squeaker McCarthy , Week X

      Reply
    49. 49.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 2:46 pm

      @piratedan: There was reporting on Friday night that the near fisticuffs was related to the chair of a committee and a subchair of that committee (or whatever the term is) having been promised to one of the terrorists.

      So yeah, I don’t think that’s gonna go over well.

      Reply
    50. 50.

      FelonyGovt

      January 9, 2023 at 2:50 pm

      @Tim Ellis: California did not cover ourselves with glory either.

      Reply
    51. 51.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 2:51 pm

      @piratedan: Some observers say the key concession made by McCarthy was guarenteeing 3 Rules Commitee seats to Freedom Caucus members. This Committee will have 9 Republicans and 4 Democrats, and it has a lot of say over the progress of bills on the floor, amendments etc.

      This is sometimes called “the Speaker’s Committee” because the Speaker typically stocks it with loyalists who will further his goals. Now, McCarthy will not neccesarily have a majority because, for different reasons, the 4 Democrats and 3 Freedom Kookuses might together outvote his 6 members.

      Reply
    52. 52.

      bbleh

      January 9, 2023 at 2:53 pm

      @Brachiator: @Kent: @piratedan: @WaterGirl: most of the reporting I’ve seen has been that the fighting has mostly been about subcommittee chairs and committee memberships, rather than committee chairs.  I think committee chairs are pretty much set in stone.  But subcommittees — especially of the larger, more powerful committees — do a lot of the detail work, so a subcommittee chair can exert some serious influence.  And of course committee membership gives the MC a platform to bloviate and the power to influence committee work by threatening to vote against whatever they produce

      And as I understand it, Rules sets not only the governing rules of the session but also the progress of all legislation — the rules for amending and voting on each bill — and so is a very powerful and much sought-after committee seat.  And 3 seats out of 9 (assuming McCarthy doesn’t stab them in the back by expanding the committee, which is a pretty safe assumption) means that the 3 Crazies plus the 4 Democrats would be 7 vs. the 6 other Republicans and hence a majority that could block potential rules.

      Reply
    53. 53.

      Baud

      January 9, 2023 at 2:53 pm

      @Geminid: Yeah, that seems like the biggest concession of all.  Hard to believe the rest of the caucus swallowed that.

      Reply
    54. 54.

      CaseyL

      January 9, 2023 at 2:54 pm

      @piratedan: I’m not sure how many of them are happy to spend their entire day shitposting on Twitter.

      HFC, yes: hell, that’s what they think their job actually is. 

      But a few of the older ones might want to do actual work, if only to make the day go by faster.  Chairing a committee is actual work.

      ETA: Not to mention that the HFC probably has no idea how to do committee work, as so many of them have never had an actual job in their lives.

      Reply
    55. 55.

      JCJ

      January 9, 2023 at 2:54 pm

      Baud, are you going to let Omnes call you a plinth?!?  Them’s fightin’ words!

      Reply
    56. 56.

      randy khan)

      January 9, 2023 at 2:56 pm

      I still love that Jeffries and Pelosi engineered the photo so that she wouldn’t be doing the handoff.

      Reply
    57. 57.

      Kelly

      January 9, 2023 at 2:59 pm

      @FelonyGovt: Oregon Dems tried for 5D-1R gerrymander but the legislative quorum rule imbedded in the state constitution created a filibuster-like opportunity for the Rs.

      Reply
    58. 58.

      karen marie

      January 9, 2023 at 3:00 pm

      @WaterGirl:  Bret is so modest.  He could have added “and I helped!”

      Reply
    59. 59.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 3:02 pm

      @randy khan): And Jeffries is standing a step above McCarthy, so he’s looking down at McCarthy as he hands the gavel off. Makes me laugh to see it!

      Reply
    60. 60.

      karen marie

      January 9, 2023 at 3:02 pm

      @WaterGirl:  I’d vote for “Squeaker in name only” over “Squeaker McCarthy” as a tagline.

      Reply
    61. 61.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 3:03 pm

      @FelonyGovt: Seems like Dems didn’t who up as strong in the states that had the protection of abortions rights, as compared to states that don’t.

      I hope this changes for every special election and in 2024.

      We didn’t need to be where we are in the House.

      Reply
    62. 62.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 3:05 pm

      @CaseyL: remind me what the HFC is?

      Reply
    63. 63.

      Kent

      January 9, 2023 at 3:05 pm

      @Kelly:@FelonyGovt: Oregon Dems tried for 5D-1R gerrymander but the legislative quorum rule imbedded in the state constitution created a filibuster-like opportunity for the Rs.

      They could have still gotten it, but they ran a fucking incompetent campaign in the 5th District and just got beat.

      Reply
    64. 64.

      karen marie

      January 9, 2023 at 3:06 pm

      @Sure Lurkalot:   What do you mean “just in case”?  I think that bird has already flown.  I haven’t looked myself but it’s been reported that the Jan 6 committee materials were pulled from the govt site where they were initially posted.

      Reply
    65. 65.

      piratedan

      January 9, 2023 at 3:07 pm

      @WaterGirl: HFC – House Freedom Caucus…. or if you’re an old like me Household Finance Corporation :-)

      Reply
    66. 66.

      Kent

      January 9, 2023 at 3:10 pm

      @Geminid:

      @Kent: I think it might make a difference what the rules are, especially the one regarding removal of the Speaker.

      Anyway, I am a curious person and the dynamics of this caucus interest me, just like the dynamics of Virginia’s state Republican party interest me.

      And I am pursuing an anthroplogy project. I’ve been impressed by how the proposition, “Latinos are not a monolith!” has become accepted doctrine here. So I am researching the question, “Are Republicans a monolith?” Preliminary findings could be shocking!

      You are presuming that the non-Freedom Caucus GOPers want to actually do real legislating and get shit done.  I don’t have that presumption.

      I do recall one analysis I read recently (forgot where) which explained that a big part of the Rules Committee involves deciding what legislation reaches the floor.  And that non-crazy control of it in the past meant that members in other than crimson districts were able to avoid having to take a lot of pointless and damaging votes on meaningless legislation.  And that if the Freedom Caucus takes over there will be a whole lot more politically stupid votes they are forced to make on legislation that is going nowhere.

      If that is the case then good, we can all get out the popcorn.

      Reply
    67. 67.

      Kelly

      January 9, 2023 at 3:11 pm

      @Kent: The Constitution Party weirdo in CD6 helped throw that seat to the Dems. No Constitution Party candidate in CD5. I’m thinking Chavez-DeRemer must have worked something out to protect her right flank.

      Reply
    68. 68.

      Baud

      January 9, 2023 at 3:16 pm

      @JCJ: Eh, I’m pretty well known for my plinthy comments.

      Reply
    69. 69.

      rikyrah

      January 9, 2023 at 3:17 pm

      Did folks see the new Tabitha Brown stuff at Target? Came out yesterday.

       

      Anna Gifty (@itsafronomics) tweeted at 7:34 PM on Sun, Jan 08, 2023: Whoever is managing Tabitha Brown’s @IamTabithaBrown deserves an award because her internet presence has since turned into:

      – Partnership with Target

      – Multiple brand deals

      – Emmy nominated children’s show

      – Co-owned vegan restaurant

      – Successful hair company #DonnasRecipe

      https://t.co/fhyujgragK (https://twitter.com/itsafronomics/status/1612261518027984898?s=02)

      Reply
    70. 70.

      rikyrah

      January 9, 2023 at 3:18 pm

      Ron Filipkowski  (@RonFilipkowski) tweeted at 4:15 PM on Sun, Jan 08, 2023:
      Bolsonaro came to Florida so he couldn’t get arrested in Brazil for instigating this.
      (https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1612211355255177217?s=02)

      Reply
    71. 71.

      HumboldtBlue

      January 9, 2023 at 3:19 pm

      @Sure Lurkalot:

      Yes, I already have that one bookmarked.

      Reply
    72. 72.

      M31

      January 9, 2023 at 3:20 pm

      @WaterGirl:

      HFC — High Fructose Cornsyrup, or something equally nutricious

      Reply
    73. 73.

      MazeDancer

      January 9, 2023 at 3:20 pm

      @WaterGirl: SINO = Speaker in Name Only. Which is actually being generous.

      Reply
    74. 74.

      CaseyL

      January 9, 2023 at 3:21 pm

      @WaterGirl:

      It’s “House Freedom Caucus”.

      And CFG is “Club for Growth.

      ETA: But I like @M31: ‘s answer better!

      Reply
    75. 75.

      Qrop Non Sequitur

      January 9, 2023 at 3:21 pm

      @WaterGirl: Seems like Dems didn’t who (show?) up as strong in the states that had the protection of abortions rights, as compared to states that don’t.

      Massachusetts on the line for you…

      Reply
    76. 76.

      NotMax

      January 9, 2023 at 3:24 pm

      Already dubbed McCarthy’s initial speech the Pettysburg Address in a previous thread. Got nuthin’ more to add.

      Reply
    77. 77.

      trollhattan

      January 9, 2023 at 3:27 pm

      @Baud: One lith cannot contain me–I am a duolith.

      Reply
    78. 78.

      Kent

      January 9, 2023 at 3:29 pm

      @Kelly:@Kent: The Constitution Party weirdo in CD6 helped throw that seat to the Dems. No Constitution Party candidate in CD5. I’m thinking Chavez-DeRemer must have worked something out to protect her right flank.

      There was an analysis and comparison of the different races in the WA-3rd which the Dems won, and the WA-5th which they lost.  I think it was in Slate.  And the conclusion is that Marie Gluesenkamp Perez ran a far superior race than Jamie McCloud in every way.  Which is how she won a race in a much redder district

      EDIT:  Here is the article:  https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/12/marie-gluesenkamp-perez-joe-kent-doorknocking.html

      Reply
    79. 79.

      MazeDancer

      January 9, 2023 at 3:32 pm

      Tried to add to my SINO answer but got timed out, that while I understand the appeal of “Squeaker”, it is a bit of an insult to mice. They are industrious, use their brains, and take good care of their young.

      Also, if you overlook the mice part,  he is a Squeaker for realz. Not “in name only.” So you are abridging the attempt at insult by adding “in name only” to “Squeaker”.

      Kevin is a real Squeaker. He barely got voted in. Call him Squeaker McCarthy for  sure. But adding “in name only” dilutes the slap.

      Reply
    80. 80.

      Dan B

      January 9, 2023 at 3:35 pm

      @rikyrah: Impressive woman!

      Reply
    81. 81.

      artem1s

      January 9, 2023 at 3:37 pm

      @karen marie: ​
        the stand alone website has been removed. it redirects here.
      https://www.govinfo.gov/committee/house-january6th?path=/browsecommittee/chamber/house/committee/january6th/collection/CHRG/congress/117
      the documents look intact. But I don’t see the full videos though.

      Reply
    82. 82.

      Kent

      January 9, 2023 at 3:39 pm

      @Qrop Non Sequitur: And Washington.

      The biggest upset in the entire country was the WA-3rd where Balloon Juice supported candidate Marie Gluesenkamp Perez beat the vile Trumper Joe Kent.  She did is by running HARD on abortion as well as blue collar economic issues.

      Reply
    83. 83.

      Qrop Non Sequitur

      January 9, 2023 at 3:42 pm

      @Kent:  vile Trumper Joe Kent.

      Hmm…I got my eye on you.

      Reply
    84. 84.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 3:45 pm

      @Kent: Another difference beteen Glusenkamp Perez’s and McLeod Skinner’s races was that McCleod-Skinner won a divisive primary against an incumbent.

      That’s no reflection on McLeod-Skinner. She was doing what a majority of the district’s Democrats wanted, but it was bound to leave some hard feelings. Kurt Schrader did not help matters either when he endorsed the Independent candidate for Governor after he lost the congressional primary.

      But I think that Republican lady who won will end up being a one-termer.

      Reply
    85. 85.

      FelonyGovt

      January 9, 2023 at 3:46 pm

      @rikyrah: I did see that, some really nice household items!

      Reply
    86. 86.

      Elizabelle

      January 9, 2023 at 3:47 pm

      Damar Hamlin now recovering in a Buffalo hospital.  Released from Cincinnati facility; closer to home now.  Excellent news.

      Reply
    87. 87.

      Baud

      January 9, 2023 at 3:50 pm

      @Qrop Non Sequitur:

      @Kent:  vile Trumper Joe Kent.

      Hmm…I got my eye on you

      Our Kent is vile Juicer Bob Kent. No relation.

      Reply
    88. 88.

      Ken

      January 9, 2023 at 3:53 pm

      @Baud: Like we would take the word of a plinth about something like that.  Where are the long form birth certificates!

      Reply
    89. 89.

      ian

      January 9, 2023 at 3:54 pm

      @MazeDancer: Sino is also often used to mean Chinese.

      Reply
    90. 90.

      Qrop Non Sequitur

      January 9, 2023 at 3:54 pm

      @Baud: My mistake. I’m used to Trumpers introducing themselves as vile. Not usually literally, I just know to read between the lines.

      Reply
    91. 91.

      The Lodger

      January 9, 2023 at 4:01 pm

      @Kent: Say more about that. It seems to me that Jamie McLeod Skinner didn’t mess up anything on her own.

      Reply
    92. 92.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 4:02 pm

      @piratedan: Thank you!

      Reply
    93. 93.

      glc

      January 9, 2023 at 4:04 pm

      @WaterGirl:  Among other things, it’s a pollutant due to be phased down (but not eliminated). Less potent than the ones before it, but needs to be kept under control. And a subject of international concern.

      Reply
    94. 94.

      The Lodger

      January 9, 2023 at 4:10 pm

      @Geminid:But I think that Republican lady who won will end up being a one-termer.

      Your keyboard to God’s ears.

      Reply
    95. 95.

      Another Scott

      January 9, 2023 at 4:12 pm

      @WaterGirl: There is only one DemocratMachine and it’s in Chicago.

      HTH!!

      Cheers,
      Scott.

      Reply
    96. 96.

      WaterGirl

      January 9, 2023 at 4:14 pm

      @glc: Thank you. :-)

      Reply
    97. 97.

      Brachiator

      January 9, 2023 at 4:15 pm

      @bbleh:

      Thanks for the info on this.

      And 3 seats out of 9 (assuming McCarthy doesn’t stab them in the back by expanding the committee, which is a pretty safe assumption) means that the 3 Crazies plus the 4 Democrats would be 7 vs. the 6 other Republicans and hence a majority that could block potential rules.

      I can’t see Democrats helping the crazies.

      But I could see the crazies pulling non-crazy Republicans more to the right.

      But we shall see what happens. Maybe McCarthy is a total idiot who has been outplayed, but I can’t see the GOP leadership letting the crazies have too much power.

      Reply
    98. 98.

      sab

      January 9, 2023 at 4:28 pm

      @rikyrah: I really like her Target stuff. And it goes with my everyday dishes!

      Reply
    99. 99.

      dexwood

      January 9, 2023 at 5:00 pm

      @MazeDancer: Agree totally with this.

      Reply
    100. 100.

      bbleh

      January 9, 2023 at 5:23 pm

      @Brachiator: No, but I can see the Crazies “helping” the Democrats block something McCarthy wants, not because they agree with the Democrats but because they’re trying to jam McCarthy.

      Reply
    101. 101.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 5:26 pm

      @The Lodger: The radical Republican caucus will put a lot of purple district Republicans in an invidious position. They and their staffers will be polishing up their resumes so that come 2025 they’ll  be ready to hunt up new jobs.

      Reply
    102. 102.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 5:31 pm

      @bbleh: It’s also a threat the radicals have to help bend McCarthy to their will. I don’t think Democrats on that committee will be doing McCarthy any favors.

      Reply
    103. 103.

      TriassicSands

      January 9, 2023 at 5:38 pm

      Several days ago I referred to McCarthy as the Weaker Meeker Squeaker Speaker McCarthy.

      It will be “interesting” to watch someone who has already given up so much and given in on pretty much everything else to negotiate with his party’s lunatics — all 217 of them.

      The bomb throwers could have prevented McCarthy from ever becoming Speaker, but it turns out they aren’t even reliably obstructionist. Roy said he would “never vote for” McCarthy and then did — 4 times. Maybe McCarthy promised to buy him the assault rifle of his choice.

      Boebert held out longer, but, while not voting for McCarthy, she did vote present, guaranteeing McCarthy’s victory. That probably cost McCarthy new assault rifles for the whole Boebert family. Priorities!

      The entire House GOP is united by insanity, cruelty, and stupidity.

      Reply
    104. 104.

      TriassicSands

      January 9, 2023 at 5:47 pm

      @bbleh:

      I don’t know about that. Does any Republican hate McCarthy more than they despise every Democrat? It’s an intriguing question.

      I doubt there will be any shortage of reasons why the “Crazies” will want to screw with McCarthy.

      Reply
    105. 105.

      Splitting Image

      January 9, 2023 at 5:49 pm

      @WaterGirl:

      Why is there no Democratic machine in New York????

      Well, New York used to have the strongest Democratic machine in the entire country, so much so that Tammany Hall is still a byword for machine-style politics. That’s part of the problem. The machine was so corrupt for so long that reformers in the 1960s finally ousted all of the Tammany Hall leadership and rendered it impotent. Since then, I think there has been a fair amount of reluctance to see the machine get rebuilt.

      I think New York also benefited from having some of the most liberal Republicans in the country. Tom Dewey and Nelson Rockefeller were leaders of the liberal wing of the Republican party back in the days when it had one. When people like them moved over to the Democrats during the Great Re-alignment, New York became so blue that I imagine no one felt a “machine” was necessary at the federal level. This is the first time it has ever been a problem, at least federally. The Democrats’ difficulties in taking the state Senate should have been treated as a warning sign, in hindsight.

      Reply
    106. 106.

      leeleeFL

      January 9, 2023 at 5:53 pm

      @WaterGirl: Can I suggest amending that tag, in keeping with the subject matter, Madame WG?

      Reply
    107. 107.

      David Crisp

      January 9, 2023 at 5:58 pm

      McCarthy’s speech actually wasn’t too bad. He started out with some red meat for the base, but the bulk of the speech was a long analogy comparing the famous painting of Washington crossing the Delaware to an America of different colors and religions pulling together to build a stronger country. Don’t know how well he will follow up on that, but it was at least a little encouraging.

      Reply
    108. 108.

      leeleeFL

      January 9, 2023 at 6:02 pm

      @Omnes Omnibus: DEEE-lightful!

      Reply
    109. 109.

      leeleeFL

      January 9, 2023 at 6:03 pm

      @WaterGirl: YESSSS, please and thank you!

      Reply
    110. 110.

      Geminid

      January 9, 2023 at 6:07 pm

      @David Crisp: That is very encouraging to hear!

      Maybe someday an artist will paint a similar work: “McCarthy Crossing the Unaware.”

      Reply
    111. 111.

      Ken

      January 9, 2023 at 6:14 pm

      @Geminid: Bravo.

      Reply
    112. 112.

      The Golux

      January 9, 2023 at 6:20 pm

      @Marleedog:

      Squeaker in Name Only

      I prefer SPINO (speaker in name only) because it sounds funnier.

      Reply
    113. 113.

      lowtechcyclist

      January 9, 2023 at 6:29 pm

      @piratedan: Damn, that was my first thought!

      “Never borrow money needlessly, but when you need to borrow, call HFC.”

      Haven’t heard that damn jingle in ~55 years, but random shit sticks in the brain.

      Reply
    114. 114.

      Kent

      January 9, 2023 at 10:56 pm

      @The Lodger:@Kent: Say more about that. It seems to me that Jamie McLeod Skinner didn’t mess up anything on her own.

      She got a LOT more national money dumped on the race and blew it on consultant-driven ad buys rather than door-to-door organizing.  At least by all reports.  I guess usually that works, until it doesn’t.

      Reply

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    If you don't see both the Visual and the Text tab on the editor, click here to refresh.

    Clear Comment

    To reply to more than one person, click the X to save & close the box.

    Primary Sidebar

    🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

    Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
    Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

    2023 Pet Calendars

    Pet Calendar Preview: A
    Pet Calendar Preview: B

    *Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

    Recent Comments

    • HumboldtBlue on Friday Evening Open Thread: Spy-by Flyby (Feb 3, 2023 @ 8:55pm)
    • Baud on Friday Evening Open Thread: Spy-by Flyby (Feb 3, 2023 @ 8:55pm)
    • J R in WV on Fun Facts Friday (Feb 3, 2023 @ 8:55pm)
    • Jim, Foolish Literalist on Friday Evening Open Thread: Spy-by Flyby (Feb 3, 2023 @ 8:53pm)
    • Planetjanet on War for Ukraine Day 344: Bakhmut! (Feb 3, 2023 @ 8:50pm)

    Balloon Juice Posts

    View by Topic
    View by Author
    View by Month & Year
    View by Past Author

    Featuring

    Medium Cool
    Artists in Our Midst
    Authors in Our Midst
    We All Need A Little Kindness
    Favorite Dogs & Cats
    Classified Documents: A Primer

    Calling All Jackals

    Site Feedback
    Nominate a Rotating Tag
    Submit Photos to On the Road
    Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

    Front-pager Twitter

    John Cole
    DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
    Betty Cracker
    Tom Levenson
    TaMara
    David Anderson
    ActualCitizensUnited

    Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

    Join the Fight!

    Join the Fight Signup Form
    All Join the Fight Posts

    Balloon Juice Events

    5/14  The Apocalypse
    5/20  Home Away from Home
    5/29  We’re Back, Baby
    7/21  Merging!

    Balloon Juice for Ukraine

    Donate

    Site Footer

    Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Comment Policy
    • Our Authors
    • Blogroll
    • Our Artists
    • Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
        Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

        Email sent!