• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • Comment
  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

A dilettante blog from the great progressive state of West Virginia.

Everybody saw this coming.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Republicans in disarray!

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

I really should read my own blog.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

After roe, women are no longer free.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Let there be snark.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Late Night Open Thread: Fool Self Driving, Out In the World

Late Night Open Thread: Fool Self Driving, Out In the World

by Anne Laurie|  January 11, 202310:44 pm| 124 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Tech News & Issues, Riveted By The Sociological Significance Of It All

FacebookTweetEmail

'Extensive' Tesla Autopilot probe proceeding 'really fast', U.S. official says https://t.co/KDBtibpAAo pic.twitter.com/4hBn6yrHE0

— Reuters (@Reuters) January 10, 2023

idk how much they have made off FSD, but if FSD at $15k/vehicle turns out to be defective, they are going to be in some very serious shit

— GOLIKEHELLMACHINE (@golikehellmachi) January 10, 2023

I obtained surveillance footage of the self-driving Tesla that abruptly stopped on the Bay Bridge, resulting in an eight-vehicle crash that injured 9 people including a 2 yr old child just hours after Musk announced the self-driving feature.

Full story: https://t.co/LaEvX9TzxW pic.twitter.com/i75jSh2UpN

— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) January 10, 2023

Musk has said Tesla’s problematic autopilot features are “really the difference between Tesla being worth a lot of money or worth basically zero.”

Highway surveillance footage from Thanksgiving Day shows a Tesla Model S vehicle changing lanes and then abruptly braking in the far-left lane of the San Francisco Bay Bridge, resulting in an eight-vehicle crash. The crash injured nine people, including a 2-year-old child, and blocked traffic on the bridge for over an hour.

The video and new photographs of the crash, which were obtained by The Intercept via a California Public Records Act request, provides the first direct look at what happened on November 24, confirming witness accounts at the time. The driver told police that he had been using Tesla’s new “Full Self-Driving” feature, the report notes, before the Tesla’s “left signal activated” and its “brakes activated,” and it moved into the left lane, “slowing to a stop directly in [the second vehicle’s] path of travel.”…

NHTSA is also investigating a tweet by Musk in which he said that “Full Self-Driving” users would soon be given the option to turn off reminder notifications for drivers to keep their hands on the steering wheel. “Users with more than 10,000 miles on FSD Beta should be given the option to turn off the steering nag,” a Twitter user posted on New Year’s Eve, tagging Musk.

“Agreed, update coming in Jan,” Musk replied.

Roll the dice with the Tesla self driving feature. Will your Tesla be a maniac that accelerates towards children and pulls into oncoming traffic or timid grandma that slams on it breaks unexpectedly. Find out today for the low, low price of $15K.

— The Next Day ([email protected]) (@incompetusrex) January 10, 2023

you just have to accept that sometimes it will suddenly stop, and if it does so your job is to put down your phone and start it moving again. the cars hitting you from behind will give you a boost

— flglmn (@flglmn) January 10, 2023

This is a car designed around the anxieties of very rich people who fear the public will turn on them. https://t.co/plT9Uj8aMW

— Paris Marx (@parismarx) January 9, 2023

Probably the best explanation I’ve seen besides “This was clearly designed by brain-damaged children who want to drive a tank” https://t.co/48cFO9kPnS

— Peter Wolf (@peterawolf) January 9, 2023

If it did musk wouldn't have spent 40 billion on Twitter ??

— Joke?? (@MEOWdy_comrades) January 10, 2023

Good lord pic.twitter.com/U3qmWI1Dgj

— הרשמה למסטודון! (@SababaUSA) January 11, 2023

The concurrent existence of:
NHTSA product defect investig'ns;
FTC unfair & deceptive practices investig'n;
Cal. DMV untrue & deceptive marketing investig'n;
DoJ criminal investig's; &
class action litigation
really highlight how much Tesla can get away with out of pure obstinacy pic.twitter.com/uLPhbL3x1W

— הרשמה למסטודון! (@SababaUSA) January 11, 2023

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Wokeness Update Open Thread: *First* As Farce…
Next Post: On The Road – way2blue – Lamu, Kenya in 2021, 3 of 8 On The Road – way2blue – Lamu, Kenya in 2021, 2 of 8»

Reader Interactions

  • Commenters
  • Filtered
  • Settings

Commenters

No commenters available.

  • 206inKY
  • Amir Khalid
  • Another Scott
  • Baud
  • bbleh
  • Betsy
  • BigJimSlade
  • Brachiator
  • Bruce K in ATH-GR
  • Bugboy
  • C Stars
  • CaseyL
  • Chetan Murthy
  • ColoradoGuy
  • Damien
  • Dangerman
  • dibert dogbert
  • different-church-lady
  • Elizabelle
  • EmbraceYourInnerCrone
  • Eyeroller
  • FastEdD
  • Formerly disgruntled in Oregon
  • Frankensteinbeck
  • Geminid
  • gene108
  • Gin & Tonic
  • Gvg
  • Hoodie
  • Jackie
  • James E Powell
  • JaneE
  • Jim, Foolish Literalist
  • JMG
  • Kayla Rudbek
  • Keith P.
  • Ken
  • Kent
  • Kristine
  • lowtechcyclist
  • Mai Naem mobile
  • Major Major Major Major
  • Mallard Filmore
  • meander
  • NotMax
  • Odie Hugh Manatee
  • Ohio Mom
  • oldster
  • opiejeanne
  • Paul in KY
  • Pete Downunder
  • Procopius
  • Ramona
  • Roger Moore
  • Ruckus
  • sab
  • Shalimar
  • Soprano2
  • StringOnAStick
  • TaMara
  • TEL
  • The Oracle of Solace
  • The Thin Black Duke
  • Tony G
  • Urza
  • VOR

Filtered Commenters

No filtered commenters available.

    Settings




    Settings are saved immediately; press X to close the box.

    124Comments

    1. 1.

      bbleh

      January 11, 2023 at 10:49 pm

      Yabbut see we’re selling an idea, a lifestyle, and that’s SO much more important than some silly product with whatever braking, crash, whatever stuff, which definitely will be worked out because something something tech.  Also have you seen the cool built-in screens? And the styling, I mean … damn!

      Reply
    2. 2.

      Elizabelle

      January 11, 2023 at 10:49 pm

      Yesterday’s LA Times brought us a nice picture of a Tesla.  Submerged in somebody’s backyard pool in Pasadena.

      Assumption was the driver hit the accelerator instead of brake.  Hmmmm.
      Three people, including a 4-year-old boy, are rescued after Tesla crashes into a poo

      Here’s a free link, local CBS station report.  Tesla looks good in the chlorinated blue water.

      Reply
    3. 3.

      Keith P.

      January 11, 2023 at 10:51 pm

      I’ve been saying this since the first time this kind of tech was deployed – how the hell did the DOT ever let anyone *beta* test self-driving software in real traffic?

      Reply
    4. 4.

      Dangerman

      January 11, 2023 at 10:52 pm

      I’d almost be OK with self driving cars if they are well identified like student drivers. Always useful to know which “drivers” are ignorant shits.

      Reply
    5. 5.

      Ken

      January 11, 2023 at 10:58 pm

      Tesla stock has been climbing back a little lately, probably mostly because they put Tom Zhu in charge of actually making and selling the cars, but I’d bet a chunk of it was because the House elections drove Musk out of the news for a while. I have to think this video release and related news won’t be good for that. It’ll also be a test of how tightly they’ve clamped down on Musk’s Tesla-related twitting.

      Also:

      “Users with more than 10,000 miles on FSD Beta should be given the option to turn off the steering nag,” a Twitter user posted on New Year’s Eve, tagging Musk. “Agreed, update coming in Jan,” Musk replied.

      Were I a twit, I’d be tempted to post “I’ve got a bet with a friend that your narcissism forces you to treat any acknowledgment of your existence as affirmation, no matter what the content” and tag Musk, just to see if he replies “Agreed, great analysis.”

      Reply
    6. 6.

      Gvg

      January 11, 2023 at 11:02 pm

      A couple of years ago, even people on this site thought long haul truckers jobs were in danger from AI trucks. I didn’t think technology was really close to that and still don’t. It’s just really complex to handle all the things we think about.

      Maybe we can automate a train system better if we actually had a good train system to start with.

      Musk is a compulsive liar. But it wasn’t just him, the robo truck was a lot of different people saying. It had a lot to do with AI promoters too. Research and development is worth trying and doing but realism about where we are has to be a part of it too.

      Reply
    7. 7.

      TaMara

      January 11, 2023 at 11:06 pm

      My car has accident avoidance features and adaptive cruise control. The number of times it has misinterpreted things that I either ignore or have to actively override is scary.

      The features are great, but they are far from perfect. More like autocorrect on your phone…you always want to double check, lest you send me a text saying send me dick pictures when you meant to say duck. Which may or may not have happened with our blog master.

      Reply
    8. 8.

      bbleh

      January 11, 2023 at 11:10 pm

      @Gvg: I still can see mostly-robot “truck trains” going between staging-points via access-controlled highways.  They would be major pains in the ass for other drivers, but I can see it being done anyway in the name of high-tech efficient whatever (ie, profit). Unlike railways it wouldn’t require rights of way and so would be more flexible, and keeping it to access-controlled highways (with staging-points right next to ramps) would reduce the technical challenges.  But I still don’t know whether it would have enough advantages to be profitable, and of course human drivers would be required from the staging-points to the ultimate destinations.

      Could be the whole thing would be determined not on the basis of economics but politics.  Might be profitable, but one “truck train” wiping out a suburban minivan carrying a mom and her children could be enough to get the whole thing banned for good.

      Reply
    9. 9.

      NotMax

      January 11, 2023 at 11:11 pm

      If a camel is a horse designed by a committee, self-driving is a feature designed by a sadist.

      Reply
    10. 10.

      Jim, Foolish Literalist

      January 11, 2023 at 11:13 pm

      I’ll never buy a self-driving car

      A self-flying car…. we’ll see what the sticker price is, can I get maybe get zero percent…?

      Reply
    11. 11.

      Betsy

      January 11, 2023 at 11:14 pm

      Is it just me or does that logo look like an IUD?

      Reply
    12. 12.

      The Oracle of Solace

      January 11, 2023 at 11:14 pm

      When I went shopping for an electric car about two years ago, Tesla’s Model 3 tumbled rather quickly in my estimation. I ended up sticking with my current vehicle, but looking ahead, Teslas are basically MAGA hats on wheels, so they’re off the list.

      On an unrelated note, I got cast in a local play, so that’s neat. First audition since the pandemic began, and I did all right.

      Reply
    13. 13.

      Urza

      January 11, 2023 at 11:14 pm

      @Gvg: The disturbing part is how many companies are still funding research as if its solvable with current tech.  Anything less than the Cloud controlling every car and its going to have so many edge case failures, and Americans are not even remotely close to letting an anonymous computer control every car, traffic light and have cameras all along the road even if it did work.

      Reply
    14. 14.

      Betsy

      January 11, 2023 at 11:16 pm

      @Elizabelle: Excellent typo!

      Reply
    15. 15.

      bbleh

      January 11, 2023 at 11:16 pm

      @Betsy: Lol I would guess the intention was, um, sorta the opposite.

      Reply
    16. 16.

      NotMax

      January 11, 2023 at 11:17 pm

      @TaMara

      There comes a point when the multiplicity of such features tips from driver safety to driver complacency and its corollary, inattentiveness. There certainly are days when traveling the roads observing the traffic when it more than seems it’s already so.

      Reply
    17. 17.

      Formerly disgruntled in Oregon

      January 11, 2023 at 11:17 pm

      @TaMara: That’s perfect.

      FSD = the flawless perfection of autocorrect, but for your car! Let the algorithm take over…

      Unfortunately, Teslas put all of at risk from their dangerous and unpredictable behavior. It’s not just their drivers putting their lives on the line…

      Unsafe at any speed, indeed!

      Reply
    18. 18.

      Betsy

      January 11, 2023 at 11:18 pm

      @bbleh: Highways don’t require rights of way?  I fail to see any part of the arrangement you have described that isn’t vastly better and far more efficiently done with trains. Way stations – limited access – still requires intermodal between the dedicated train portions ….

      Reply
    19. 19.

      FastEdD

      January 11, 2023 at 11:19 pm

      “While, yes, Tesla’s system was the particular one that appears to have failed here, and yes, the system is deceptively named in a way that encourages this idiotic behavior, this is not a problem unique to Tesla. It’s not a technical problem. You can’t program your way out of the problem with Level 2; in fact, the better the Level 2 system seems to be, the worse the problem gets. That problem is that human beings are simply no good at monitoring systems that do most of the work of a task and remaining ready to take over that task with minimal to no warning.’”

      -Jason Torchinsky, on level 2 autonomous driving in an article today at The Autopian. He wrote a book on this subject called “Robot Take the Wheel.”

      Reply
    20. 20.

      bbleh

      January 11, 2023 at 11:25 pm

      @Betsy: yeah I dunno if the numbers would work out.  Access-controlled highways are EVERYWHERE, and staging-points would be little more than parking lots, a la park-n-ride, and wouldn’t have to be RIGHT next to the ramp.  But rail is still far more efficient per ton-mile, so the advantages of greater location flexibility might be outweighed by the increased costs.  And it might also depend on the type of cargo, eg, fresh goods almost always move by truck, so there might be segregation by product.

      Sounds like a Master’s thesis at least.  And there’s still the question of how it would work on the highways. Imagine trying to cut into a line of, say, 20 trucks to try to get to your exit…

      Reply
    21. 21.

      Another Scott

      January 11, 2023 at 11:26 pm

      @bbleh: That might be a potential use case, but given the exploded tire carcasses one sees along most miles of US interstate highways, I would want there to be lots and lots of testing of events like that before letting it out in the wild.

      I remember driving next to a semi trailer once when it had a tire explode.  It’s a startling event, to say the least!  (He pulled over just fine, but the truck did sway a bit…)

      Personally, I think the self-driving technology is too immature for general use, and too expensive to get right (it looks like Waymo’s tech adds ~ $50-80+k to the cost of one of their cars) and probably will be for a while. MotUs that want to get rid of all their employees can’t wait for AI and computers to mean that they can just sit back and collect their monopoly rents without having to deal with humans, but I wonder who they think is going to buy all their robots and stuff to fill up their self-driving trucks. Consumers without jobs don’t do too much consuming…

      I’m a big fan of progress and R&D, but rolling stuff out too quickly kills people, and letting some MotU lock up the market stifles long-term progress. Markets require regulation, and especially require effective competition.

      Cheers,
      Scott.

      Reply
    22. 22.

      NotMax

      January 11, 2023 at 11:36 pm

      @Another Scott

      There’s some things AI is capable of.

      Driving isn’t one of them.
      ;)

      Reply
    23. 23.

      oldster

      January 11, 2023 at 11:41 pm

      I’m glad that the Federal probe into FSD is getting up to speed, but I worry that it will run into a brick wall.

      Or just slow to a crawl for no good reason.

      Instead, I’m hoping that it will surge forward, put the pedal to the metal, and run down any mining heirs who might be in the way.

      Reply
    24. 24.

      Roger Moore

      January 11, 2023 at 11:45 pm

      My personal theory to explain a lot of Tesla’s self-driving quirks is that they’ve been trying to save money by recording real-world driving. The cars are already set up to record all the sensor data and the drivers’ responses, and they’re in constant contact with HQ, so they can get billions of miles of actual driving experience for the price of transmitting the data. The problem is they’ve been training their cars by observing Tesla drivers, so they’ve effectively been training their autopilot to be an obnoxious, self-centered asshole that ignores traffic laws whenever it’s convenient.

      Reply
    25. 25.

      Chetan Murthy

      January 11, 2023 at 11:46 pm

      @oldster: I suspect that long before the government gets off its fat ass, investors will have deserted that damned hulk.  I mean, I’d like for things to be different, but …. it is what it is.

      Reply
    26. 26.

      Elizabelle

      January 11, 2023 at 11:51 pm

      @Betsy:   LOL!  Thanks.  Messed that up adding the KCAL link.

      Funny.

      Trust me, the car looks better in the water.

      Reply
    27. 27.

      Pete Downunder

      January 11, 2023 at 11:57 pm

      • I confess to having had a Tesla mod 3 for over 2 years now. While initially thrilled with it as to performance and cost of operation I’m becoming disenchanted. Musk just offered a Christmas present of one month free FSD but I don’t trust it enough to try it. Some “features” are really bad human factors design. Having virtually everything on the touch screen means you have to take your eyes off the road to adjust the air con or change radio stations. I get occasional phantom braking even in regular cruise control. I don’t understand how use of FSD is legal anywhere. It’s not here Downunder.
      Reply
    28. 28.

      CaseyL

      January 12, 2023 at 12:06 am

      @Betsy: Looks more like a very stylized uterus to me, but… yeah, a very female logo.  Which, as @bbleh: notes, is the opposite of what they were probably going for.

      But when it comes to logos that make me laugh out loud, so far nothing beats Amazon Prime’s “smile,” which to me will forever be a line drawing of the underside of a penis.

      Reply
    29. 29.

      Roger Moore

      January 12, 2023 at 12:06 am

      @Keith P.:

      I’ve been saying this since the first time this kind of tech was deployed – how the hell did the DOT ever let anyone *beta* test self-driving software in real traffic?

      You’re going to have to try it in real traffic for the first time at some point.  Almost by definition it’s going to be beta quality when you do, since there’s no simulation that can possibly match real world conditions.  The real problem is two-fold:

      1. The testing is in the hands of random owners, rather than paid professionals. Yeah, it would be very expensive to drive tens or hundreds of millions of miles with professional testers behind the wheel, but too fucking bad.  That’s what it takes to get technology ready for the big time.  You don’t get to skip essential safety steps because it would be too expensive.
      2. They’ve been two-faced in the way they’ve presented their technology.  On the one hand, the legal department has done its best to describe in detail how careful drivers need to be while- by Tesla’s admission- running beta software.  On the other hand, they’ve branded it as Full Self-Driving and charged users an exorbitant price for it, both of which tend to convince people it is ready for regular use.  At the very best they’re sending a mixed message, and at worst that’s fraud.
      Reply
    30. 30.

      Roger Moore

      January 12, 2023 at 12:13 am

      @Betsy:

      Highways don’t require rights of way?

      Highways require rights of way, but trucks don’t because the highway has handled it for them.  That’s the thing about all this stuff.  Our road system is enormously expensive, and taxes directed specifically at road users pay for only a tiny percentage of that price.  The net result is that everyone is subsidizing drivers and (to a greater extent) truckers.  If the truckers had to pay for their own roads the way railroads have to pay upkeep on their tracks, we’d have a lot more rail and a lot less trucking.

      Reply
    31. 31.

      Brachiator

      January 12, 2023 at 12:16 am

      @Another Scott:

      Personally, I think the self-driving technology is too immature for general use, and too expensive to get right (it looks like Waymo’s tech adds ~ $50-80+k to the cost of one of their cars) and probably will be for a while.

      Of course part of the folly here is that even though people talk about self-driving cars, right now there is no such thing, only variations of assisted driving technology, some of which is very successful and fairly common. Some of the additions to automobile, RADAR and LIDAR and night vision technologies, can be of great assistance to human drivers.

      I have a feeling, not based on any current news stories, that research into self-operating ground and air military equipment, from drones to attack vehicles, will be used to crack the problem of self-driving cars.

      As an aside, I read recently that agreement was reached to allow right-of-repair for John Deere agricultural equipment. I look at the relatively rapid adoption of software into consumer and agricultural equipment and am amazed how this has moved from do it yourself and hobbyists technology to a battle to protect intellectual property and to erode the concept of ownership.

      MotUs that want to get rid of all their employees can’t wait for AI and computers to mean that they can just sit back and collect their monopoly rents without having to deal with humans, but I wonder who they think is going to buy all their robots and stuff to fill up their self-driving trucks. Consumers without jobs don’t do too much consuming…

      I honestly do not understand your luddite rant here. Technology has always disrupted employment and will continue to do so. I imagine that the invention of the wheel and the creation of wagons led to people losing jobs as porters, hiring themselves out to carry packages for paying customers.

      I recently read that the phone companies will finally retire 411 operator assistance, which I didn’t even realize still existed. From a CNN story.

      The advance of technology like the internet and smartphones, the deregulation of the telecomms industry in the 1980s, and other factors have left human operators virtually extinct. In 2021, there were fewer than 4,000 telephone operators, down from a peak of around 420,000 in the 1970s, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

      I watch old movies about corporate life, which show a secretarial pool of scores of typists and receptionists and clerical staff, all of whom have largely disappeared.

      There may be a tipping point where automation and AI eliminate jobs faster than employment can be transformed. But you cannot blame asshole billionaires for this. It is a primary component of human ingenuity.

      My 2 cents worth…

      Reply
    32. 32.

      Ohio Mom

      January 12, 2023 at 12:18 am

      @CaseyL: Thank you. I’ve always wondered if I was the only one who looked at the Amazon Prime logo and saw a dick. I feel relieved that I am not imagining things.

      On another note, I am not a regular Atrios reader anymore but when I was, one of his hobbyhorses was that self-driving cars were never going to happen. He convinced me and so far I see no reason to change my mind.

      Reply
    33. 33.

      Jackie

      January 12, 2023 at 12:19 am

      So now we have to apply defensive driving to Tesla cars along with every other defensive driving possibilities.

      Great.

      Reply
    34. 34.

      Chetan Murthy

      January 12, 2023 at 12:25 am

      @Brachiator:

      I honestly do not understand your luddite rant here.

      I work(ed) in I/T.  My career was spent destroying the jobs of operators, bank tellers, and other low-skill workers all over the economy.  And yes, you’re right, that since the days of Ned Ludd, service economy workers have been disintermediated by new technology.  And yeah, this is just the way progress works, and we can’t very well kvetch about it …. on fucking computers, FFS, FFS.

      On the other hand, there’s a good point, that as computers take over sector-after-sector, capital and the returns-on-capital need to be taxed more aggressively, so those monies can get invested into training workers for the new careers that will arise.  Or so that older careers that have not yet been automated (but were heretofore low-paid) can become higher-paid.  What’s important, is that the gains of automation don’t get taken by some small subset of society, b/c that’s the road to feudalism and eventual slavery.

      Reply
    35. 35.

      gene108

      January 12, 2023 at 12:27 am

      I just marvel at how badly Musk has destroyed his public image he built up over the last 10 years, because of the Twitter purchase.

      No one likes to trust someone, only to be made a fool of later. The media that fluffed him will eventually get their knives out, sooner or later.

      Reply
    36. 36.

      NotMax

      January 12, 2023 at 12:30 am

      @CaseyL

      will forever be a line drawing of the underside of a penis

      You mean it’s not?
      :)

      (Waves to B-J After Dark.)

      Reply
    37. 37.

      VOR

      January 12, 2023 at 12:31 am

      @TaMara: Agree. My 2022 has Lane Keeping Assist, which nudges the car into the center of the lane. I generally like the feature but don’t take my hands off the wheel. My son was driving the car on a two lane road and told me it was trying to drive down the middle line, straddling the lanes, as if it couldn’t see the middle stripe. Which is possible, since it was snowing.

      It also has Automatic Emergency Braking, which can be a PITA when I’m parking close to a known object like a garbage can or my garage door. The thing will slam on the brakes a few feet before the object, even though I’m moving under 5 MPH with my hands on the steering wheel. Yeah, I know that object is there but I’m intentionally trying to park close to it.

      I do like the Blind Spot monitoring, but I don’t trust it. I always look for myself.

      Adaptive Cruise Control is a nice thing. It automatically slows down or speeds up in order to keep a gap with the car ahead. One problem is I sometimes do not realize the car ahead has decided to slow down, such as driving 62 MPH in a 70 zone. Since the car is handling the speed, I often don’t notice until everyone behind me starts changing lanes and blocking me in place behind Mr. 62.

      Reply
    38. 38.

      Damien

      January 12, 2023 at 12:33 am

      Who was it who said that having a Tesla is like if your printer was a car?

      Because I have yet to see a better, more apt description

      Reply
    39. 39.

      Kent

      January 12, 2023 at 12:34 am

      @bbleh:@Gvg: I still can see mostly-robot “truck trains” going between staging-points via access-controlled highways.

      We already have that and have had it for 150 years.  They are called trains.

      Why build whole new access-controlled freight corridors between manufacturing and distribution centers when we have a far better and more efficient system already in existence?  Modernize our freight railroads makes a lot more sense.

      Reply
    40. 40.

      Kent

      January 12, 2023 at 12:38 am

      @Gvg:A couple of years ago, even people on this site thought long haul truckers jobs were in danger from AI trucks. I didn’t think technology was really close to that and still don’t. It’s just really complex to handle all the things we think about.

      The first time a self-driving truck with no driver runs over a 5 year old on a bicycle it will be all over.   No driver to blame for driver error?  Some big company will have to eat an ENORMOUS settlement.

      Reply
    41. 41.

      206inKY

      January 12, 2023 at 12:42 am

      Google has been approaching autonomous vehicles the right way with 14 years of development and safety testing. We still don’t have Waymo vehicles since Google is the adult in the room. Lunatic companies like Uber and Tesla have been intermittently trying to crash the party, but Waymo has been staying the course and I can’t wait to use it someday. Done properly this technology can save 30,000 lives a year in the US alone, but assholes like Musk are destroying consumer trust.

      Reply
    42. 42.

      C Stars

      January 12, 2023 at 12:44 am

      I love the idea of self-driving vehicles. I dislike driving, and humans are generally more capricious and untrustworthy than machines. I took a ride in a self-driving Waymo car in Phoenix last year, and it was novel and cool but also just scary. The car changed lanes in a very slow and obnoxious way, riding the line for several meters before jerking over into the next lane proper. And turning in the intersections it went absolutely straight before suddenly at the last minute executing the turn. I was glad when the ride was over. Clearly the tech isn’t quite there yet.

      Reply
    43. 43.

      James E Powell

      January 12, 2023 at 12:48 am

      @Chetan Murthy:

      so those monies can get invested into training workers for the new careers that will arise.

      While I agree generally, I am curious about the assumptions:  a) that new careers will arise in sufficient numbers & with the same or increased income, b) that workers can be trained for those careers, and c) that the money collected through taxes, then invested in training will be enough to make it all happen.

      Reply
    44. 44.

      Major Major Major Major

      January 12, 2023 at 12:49 am

      Some day we will be rid of this meddlesome idiot. Hopefully hilariously.

      In other news, been laid up all day with food poisoning, blech.

      Reply
    45. 45.

      sab

      January 12, 2023 at 12:50 am

      @Betsy: It’s not just you. Can’t believe I didn’t notice that years ago.

      Reply
    46. 46.

      Chetan Murthy

      January 12, 2023 at 12:54 am

      @James E Powell: If money is given to people, they will find reasons to spend it, and those reasons will produce new careers.  The problem comes when money is not given to the vast mass of people, but instead hoarded by the richest — then they have no reason to want to find new and interest ways to spend that money, b/c they already have every material need.

      Now, as to whether those new careers will be sufficiently remunerative …. all I can say is, that’s a matter of adequately progressive taxation.  I’m not saying it’s all straightforward.  And for sure, in our country there are too many GODDAMN TEMPORARILY EMBARRASSED MILLIONAIRES.  But setting aside those sorts of *real obstacles*, if we simply tax away massive profits and redistriibute them to the vast majority of the population, we can rely upon them to spend that money, and that will solve the problem.

      Reply
    47. 47.

      C Stars

      January 12, 2023 at 1:01 am

      @Roger Moore: Yep. And aren’t passenger trains also required to pay for rail time? My middle schooler who is obsessed with trains was just explaining this to me.

      Reply
    48. 48.

      BigJimSlade

      January 12, 2023 at 1:01 am

      I’m pretty damn sick of Elon Schmuck.

      Reply
    49. 49.

      Major Major Major Major

      January 12, 2023 at 1:06 am

      @Brachiator:

      There may be a tipping point where automation and AI eliminate jobs faster than employment can be transformed. But you cannot blame asshole billionaires for this. It is a primary component of human ingenuity.

      This, exactly. Ingenuity has, so far, generally taken care of both the disruption and transformation required in its wake. I remain skeptical that we’ll see a sudden explosion of generalist neural networks taking everybody’s jobs at once… and whether they can or not is mostly down to how interesting the research is. None of the engineers at Alphabet are twirling their mustaches on their fingers as they cackle in glee about leaving long-haul truck drivers high and dry. Yes, it’s profitable, but this particular paradigm has been an active area of research since, literally, the 1950s.

      Is it profitable? Sometimes! So are lots of things. And in fact orgs like OpenAI care *more* than a lot of other people about preventing its misuse.

      Reply
    50. 50.

      CaseyL

      January 12, 2023 at 1:06 am

      @Ohio Mom: It was so obvious to me from the start, I thought it was deliberate, possibly an inside joke.

      The first time I heard someone refer to the logo as a smile, I actually stared at them; like, “Don’t you see what I see?”

      Reply
    51. 51.

      Brachiator

      January 12, 2023 at 1:13 am

      @Chetan Murthy:

      And yeah, this is just the way progress works, and we can’t very well kvetch about it …. on fucking computers, FFS, FFS.

      I started working, part time as a teen, in the late 70s and saw a transformation of society. I worked at a major newspaper just as they were moving from old lead typesetting to the use of computers and electronic production. The old guys (and they were all men) who did not retire were allowed to become proofreaders and take other jobs at their current salaries. New hires came in at a lower wage.

      Later I saw how the humble spreadsheet eliminated entire floors of clerical workers who kept various ledgers related to business operations. Good job, VisiCalc.

      Computers and other technology soon eliminated branch offices of many businesses.

      Employment picked up again, but I will bet that a significant amount of wage stagnation came from people having to take new jobs at lower salaries. I wonder if there are many good studies of this possibility.

      On the other hand, there’s a good point, that as computers take over sector-after-sector, capital and the returns-on-capital need to be taxed more aggressively, so those monies can get invested into training workers for the new careers that will arise.  Or so that older careers that have not yet been automated (but were heretofore low-paid) can become higher-paid.

      I think that most job training is ineffective. Government and industry guess incorrectly about where new jobs will open up. Even worse, they train people for the next batch of jobs that will soon disappear. And as I noted above, new industries often pay less than old industries, especially if former jobs had union protection. This hurts older workers but may provide long careers for younger workers. I don’t know if there are good solutions here.

      ETA. A new phenomenon that is bumming me out. I work with a company that uses a lot of remote workers. This year, increases in the minimum wage in many states has led this company to hire English speaking foreign workers. The transition was very smooth. But talk about international job disruption.

      Reply
    52. 52.

      Frankensteinbeck

      January 12, 2023 at 1:15 am

      Fully self-driving cars are not going to happen unless we get a breakthrough of a new kind of artificial intelligence.  Machine learning has limits inherent in its concept.  Asked to respond to complex inputs, it will always give you an ‘it works until it doesn’t’ result.  Making it interact with humans inevitably brings whatever flaw snuck into the pattern out, because we’re so absurdly complex and layered and contextual and evolving.  That AI producing a picture in response to your prompt is hilarious when you ask for salmon swimming upriver and it gives you beautifully rendered sushi rolls.  When a car makes that kind of context error, people die.  You always have to watch machine learning for those context errors, so… you’ll never actually be able to let it drive itself.

      Reply
    53. 53.

      C Stars

      January 12, 2023 at 1:16 am

      @Major Major Major Major: ugh, I hope it’s a quick bout.

      Reply
    54. 54.

      meander

      January 12, 2023 at 1:22 am

      Here’s an interesting look at autonomous trucks from a trucking trade magazine (Diesel Progress), where the writer notes that “trucks require massive amounts of human interaction to safely reach a destination,” like inspections, fueling, maintenance, etc.  The author estimates that “an autonomous truck on a coast-to-coast haul will likely need at least 15 to 20 humans at various points to help it along its journey.”

      In the San Francisco Chronicle from December, New California law effectively bans Tesla from advertising its cars as Full Self-Driving:  “Tesla will effectively be banned from advertising its vehicles as Full Self-Driving under a new law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom this legislative session. ”

      Reply
    55. 55.

      Major Major Major Major

      January 12, 2023 at 1:23 am

      @Brachiator: we’ve started “nearshoring” (hiring in Mexico what a stupid word lol) for a lot of our new engineers. They’re… okay… but so much of what we do takes place in a US-location-required ‘clean room’ that’s it’s just been impossible to onboard people. Our tools don’t work.

      Reply
    56. 56.

      Amir Khalid

      January 12, 2023 at 1:23 am

      @Betsy:

      We should all start calling it the Tesla IUD. I bet Elon will be pleased.

      Reply
    57. 57.

      Brachiator

      January 12, 2023 at 1:24 am

      @Major Major Major Major:

      Sorry to learn that you have been ill. Hope things get better soon. I know the feeling.

      Reply
    58. 58.

      Roger Moore

      January 12, 2023 at 1:26 am

      @Major Major Major Major:

      I remain skeptical that we’ll see a sudden explosion of generalist neural networks taking everybody’s jobs at once… and whether they can or not is mostly down to how interesting the research is.

      I think there’s also a question about how well our existing approaches to AI/ML will scale.  I won’t pretend to be an expert, but all the media stuff I’ve seen about AI/ML suggests that recent developments have been at least as much about throwing more resources at the problems rather than fundamentally smarter approaches to the problem.  We’ve been building up ever more enormous corpora of material to train on, bigger neural networks, and more processors to do the massive effort involved in the training.  Companies are spending years and hundreds of millions of dollars developing some of these AIs, and they are still scratching the surface of what humans can do.  It’s not obvious how much money and time we’d have to throw at the problem to automate some of these tasks, or even if there’s enough training material in existence to let it work.

      Reply
    59. 59.

      Mallard Filmore

      January 12, 2023 at 1:31 am

      @C Stars:

      aren’t passenger trains also required to pay for rail time?

      Amtrak owns the North East Corridor rail line between Washington DC and Boston. Everywhere else it runs its trains on the tracks of freight haulers.

      Google says:

      How much does Amtrak pay to use tracks?
      Every year Amtrak pays host railroads $142 million for using their tracks and other resources needed to operate Amtrak trains.

      Reply
    60. 60.

      gene108

      January 12, 2023 at 1:37 am

      @Chetan Murthy:

      On the other hand, there’s a good point, that as computers take over sector-after-sector, capital and the returns-on-capital need to be taxed more aggressively, so those monies can get invested into training workers for the new careers that will arise.

      I don’t think everyone can be retrained or wants to be retrained. Automation is only one issue we’ll be dealing with in the near future. I think along with people displaced from jobs due to automation, we’re going to have to deal with global population decline in the next 50 to 100 years. East Asia and Northern Europe may be dealing with this in a generation.

      I’d personally like some sort of UBI or other means so everyone’s needs can be met. Our whole economic model of business success being defined as Year-over-year growth in sales will breakdown, as there are fewer people to sell to. My gut feeling is trying to measure wealth by the value of real estate or stock holdings isn’t going to work after a certain point of population decline.

      I’d like to rethink the entire economy, so we can have something like what Earth has in the Star Trek universe, where everyone has their needs met and people who want to work can and those that don’t aren’t forced to.

      Reply
    61. 61.

      Roger Moore

      January 12, 2023 at 1:38 am

      @Brachiator:

      I think a lot of the problems you’re describing are not inevitable outcomes.  Employers having all the power and being able to use technological changes to screw over employees is the result of deliberate policy decisions.  Just look at how much ground unions have made over the past couple of years of having a NLRB that actually tries to enforce our labor code; they could do even more if we actually made our laws more pro-labor, too.

      Reply
    62. 62.

      Odie Hugh Manatee

      January 12, 2023 at 1:40 am

      @TaMara: “Which may or may not have happened with our blog master.”

      Do tell…

      /popcorn

       

       

      @TaMara:

      Reply
    63. 63.

      Another Scott

      January 12, 2023 at 1:41 am

      @Brachiator: My dad’s first job was working as a pin-setter in a bowling alley when he was 8.  Automation, and child labor laws, replaced those jobs.

      When I was growing up, kids on bicycles delivered newspapers.  Guys in vans replaced those jobs, then Craig’sList and mergers crushed newspapers and took those jobs.  Around here, the guys who used to deliver newspapers from vans now have (or had) tree and lawn service companies.

      Economies evolve or die.

      But people work in those economies, and guys who used to deliver newspapers out of vans aren’t going to community college to learn AI programming.   Retraining sounds good, but is really, mainly, just a way for companies to push the costs of workforce development onto others.  There has to be a way for people who don’t own their own businesses (who are most of us) to earn a living as the economy evolves.  Telling everyone to go to school to be a coder or a nurse’s aid is not a serious solution.

      Around here, it seems like kids don’t have much in the way of summer or after-school jobs.  Maybe I just don’t see it.  Maybe they’re being trained and forced to accept unpaid internships as training for their future as low-paid adjuncts and post-docs after they finish school. :-/

      We need to think long and hard about how we want the economy to evolve, because it is going to happen.  And the choices we make, the people we elect, and the laws we write, are going to determine how it does so.

      My $0.02.

      Cheers,
      Scott.

      Reply
    64. 64.

      Chetan Murthy

      January 12, 2023 at 1:56 am

      @gene108:

      I don’t think everyone can be retrained or wants to be retrained.

      Two answers: (1) UBI.  (2) more realistically, the jobs that will be left, will be those that require actual human touch.  Care-giving.  We’re not talking retraining as computer programmers,  but as nurses’ assistants, home health aides, teachers’ aides, and child care workers.   B/c those are going to be tough to automate.  Maybe you’re saying that some rough-and-tough man’s-man coal miner will *refuse* to learn these new skills?  Sure, I can buy that.  And for him, there’ll be UBI.

      For his children, these will be the new jobs.  And y’know, if they don’t want those jobs, there’ll be UBI for them, too.  But the idea that somehow, the guy who pumps gas at a full-service station, whose dad did that, can expect that his kids will do that, is *incompatible* with a world where we communicate world-wide using the Internet, at basically zero cost.

      You can have the Internet, or you can have your old-timey jobs.  You can’t have both.

      Reply
    65. 65.

      Another Scott

      January 12, 2023 at 2:08 am

      @Chetan Murthy: New Jersey still has a law against self-service gas pumps, doesn’t it?  Bell Labs was in New Jersey.

      Every economy has laws that guide it.  We can be smart about the laws, or we can be stupid about the laws, but in either case they will determine (to some extent anyway) how the economy and employment changes.

      Cheers,
      Scott.

      Reply
    66. 66.

      Ramona

      January 12, 2023 at 2:12 am

      @Betsy: My goodness! Yes, it does! I’ve been scratching my head for years trying to figure out what the Tesla logo reminded me of.

      Reply
    67. 67.

      TEL

      January 12, 2023 at 2:23 am

      Wow – I know the Bay Bridge inside out and backwards and that is a lousy place to lose control of your car. It’s going eastbound just out of SF where the bridge stacks and there’s nowhere to go on the left side other than in the concrete. It looks like the driver knew something was wrong – they had the turn indicator on and were trying to get out of one of the center lanes. Plus you’re going from the outside daylight into darkness (it’s not well-lit) so it’s difficult to see.

      Reply
    68. 68.

      Ramona

      January 12, 2023 at 2:39 am

      @CaseyL: I see both a smile and a reason to smile.

      Reply
    69. 69.

      TEL

      January 12, 2023 at 2:40 am

      Whoops! Just read the accompanying article and it looks like the car did the lane change all by itself assuming the driver wasn’t lying. That’s even worse.

      Reply
    70. 70.

      Brachiator

      January 12, 2023 at 2:41 am

      @Another Scott:

      Telling everyone to go to school to be a coder or a nurse’s aid is not a serious solution.

      Which is why I have never advocated anything like this.

      We need to think long and hard about how we want the economy to evolve, because it is going to happen.  And the choices we make, the people we elect, and the laws we write, are going to determine how it does so.

      I don’t think you can write very effective laws to help the economy evolve. Some laws just get in the way.

      Off the top of my head, I would suggest job credits, rigorously audited, for companies that hire and retrain people. I have read, for example, that some companies cannot find experienced machinists and other skilled workers. Make it easier for companies to train needed workers.

      I also favor national unemployment compensation or state offsets, so that people are not forced to stay in communities where jobs have disappeared. Maybe some form of UBI and enhanced Earned Income Credits.

      Otherwise, as I noted before, jobs will disappear and new jobs will be created. You can’t really predict or manage transitions.

      ETA. Even unofficial economies adapt. The bus system formerly allowed bus tokens. Poor people would buy or otherwise acquire tokens and sell them at a discount to bus and train riders. Then TAP cards and phone apps made tokens obsolete. Now these people sell phone cases, cheap chargers and other stuff to bus and train riders. Nobody had to wait for the government to come up with a plan.

      Reply
    71. 71.

      Mai Naem mobile

      January 12, 2023 at 2:45 am

      The Tesla truck is honestly one of the ugliest vehicles I have ever seen. Its not some unique futuristic design. Its just plain butt ugly.

      Reply
    72. 72.

      Brachiator

      January 12, 2023 at 3:02 am

      @Roger Moore:

      I think a lot of the problems you’re describing are not inevitable outcomes.  Employers having all the power and being able to use technological changes to screw over employees is the result of deliberate policy decisions.

      I emphatically disagree. Please describe the alternate universe where telephone operators still exist. Unions do good work in helping workers get better pay and in making sure that working conditions are good. Unions cannot save jobs.

      Newspapers had unions. But to suggest that unions could halt the transition to cold type is absurd. Equally absurd to suggest that unions could ensure that businesses continue to use armies of clerks compiling reports using pencils and adding machines.

      Just look at how much ground unions have made over the past couple of years of having a NLRB that actually tries to enforce our labor code; they could do even more if we actually made our laws more pro-labor, too.

      In California, unions have done a poor job advising the state legislature. The state went after Uber and Lyft, with good reason. But then, with union support, the state tried to redefine who was an employee. Big money businesses, like architectural and engineering firms, rebelled and carved out exceptions.

      But even smaller businesses, like barber and beauty shops also rebelled because the proposed law was onerous and stupid. Newspapers are dying, but the law said that any newspaper that printed more than 32 articles of a contract journalist had to make that person an employee. Newspapers simply stopped hiring these writers. Yay, for who?

      A previous round of laws saw businesses simply move out of California. The economy here is robust and can survive a lot of stupidity, but the strain is starting to show.

      Reply
    73. 73.

      opiejeanne

      January 12, 2023 at 3:30 am

      Amazon Prime’s “smile,” which to me will forever be a line drawing of the underside of a penis.

      @CaseyL:

       

      GAH!!! Now I can’t ever look at that the same way.

      Reply
    74. 74.

      Amir Khalid

      January 12, 2023 at 3:41 am

      I would expect a system advertised as Fully Self-Driving to be exactly that. It should be able to drive me to a given destination reliably, efficiently, and safely. It must never misjudge any driving situation so as to endanger me or any other road user. Tesla’s FSD fails these criteria. It is plainly nowhere near fit for purpose. I’m surprised that Tesla haven’t simply been ordered to disable/uninstall it.

      Reply
    75. 75.

      ColoradoGuy

      January 12, 2023 at 3:53 am

      Whoa. If that video is representative of the kind of incidents that happen with Tesla’s so-called Full Self Driving, and it’s been happening several times a year, we’re looking at a Dieselgate scale investigation. That’s corporate fraud on a massive scale.

      VW could weather the storm because of deep pockets in Germany and a whole state-supported infrastructure around the company (VW going under would have a catastrophic effect on the German economy). Tesla has none of that … not a statewide infrastructure (California doesn’t NEED Tesla the way Germany needs VW), nor a financial structure backed by the largest banks in the country.

      If Tesla comes under sustained financial assault from the safety regulators, it would drain the stockholders (who would flee as the share price drops) and Musk personally. This investigation could take down the whole house of cards.

      SpaceX could weather the storm because of its prime customer, NASA. Not so for the car company. If customers disappear, used Tesla car prices drop, and the stock price heads to zero, that’s it.

      Reply
    76. 76.

      Bruce K in ATH-GR

      January 12, 2023 at 4:29 am

      This may seem irrelevant, but I promise it’s on topic:

      Those of you who served in militaries, and pulled sentry duty: how long were your shifts before you were relieved from your posts? Because constant vigilance in a constant, boring situation isn’t sustainable over the long term. (In my case, we were relieved after two hours on post during an overnight shift.)

      Like you said, this isn’t a problem that can be programmed around.

      Reply
    77. 77.

      Ruckus

      January 12, 2023 at 5:05 am

      @Bruce K in ATH-GR:

      In the navy, in port the sounding and security and quarterdeck watch was 4 hrs at a time and rotated every 3 days. When I was on temp shore patrol duty it was 8 hrs daytime shift or 8 hrs 6 pm to 2 am on drunk and fight patrol.

      Reply
    78. 78.

      Shalimar

      January 12, 2023 at 5:38 am

      @Mai Naem mobile: As someone close to Musk’s age, the Tesla truck reminds me of the lander in the 1986 game Starflight. Given his interest in space flight and Mars, it would surprise me if a 15 year old Musk didn’t play that game.

      The Tesla truck is futuristic, but only through the lens of the limited number of polygons 1986 home computer graphics technology could render.

      Reply
    79. 79.

      lowtechcyclist

      January 12, 2023 at 6:02 am

      @Keith P.: ​
       

      I’ve been saying this since the first time this kind of tech was deployed – how the hell did the DOT ever let anyone *beta* test self-driving software in real traffic?

      You ain’t the only one. Not only that, but DOT or NHTSA or whatever the appropriate agency is, should have been extensively monitoring Tesla’s tests of self-driving software for a couple of years, minimum, before allowing it out on the road in even the most manageable of environments, like Phoenix. And then a couple years of closely monitored tests there before letting it out into other parts of the country.

      Since it’s now clear that Tesla’s self-driving software would have flunked any tests that were actually monitored by safety officials, that would have taken care of the problem early. And then the government could have landed on Tesla like a ton of bricks if they continued to advertise self-driving capability.

      Item #142857 in the “this is why we need regulation, and why we need people in government to enforce those regulations” file.

      Reply
    80. 80.

      lowtechcyclist

      January 12, 2023 at 6:21 am

      @FastEdD: ​
       

      “That problem is that human beings are simply no good at monitoring systems that do most of the work of a task and remaining ready to take over that task with minimal to no warning.’”

      Atrios has been hammering this point for most of a decade now. If the car’s doing the driving, you can’t expect the human in the driver’s seat to keep their eyes on the road, their hands on the wheel, and their right foot ready to brake at all times. If the car’s doing a good job (until it suddenly isn’t), your attention’s going to wander after a while, and your eyes, hands, and feet with it.

      Not to mention, if you’ve got to monitor the car closely every minute of your drive, what’s the point? Might as well just do the driving yourself.

      Reply
    81. 81.

      Gvg

      January 12, 2023 at 6:21 am

      @James E Powell: Actually I think a purpose of the taxes in this case is to make sure that a few overly successful leaders of whichever modernization wave we are in at this moment doesn’t hoard all the profit and create a monopoly so that no one else has any money to to do anything else ever again and challenge their position as king of the heap.

      Who ever is the current big shot always wants to freeze time and stay there. They forget all about competition when the get to the top because then their is no where to go but down.

      That is why these no compete agreements are so stifling. The original example was John Deere not allowing anyone to repair their own purchased vehicle but requiring it to go to the dealer. That was saying people didn’t really own the equipment they paid for and keeping other businesses from offering cheaper or better service for their own profit and cutting JD’s. Monopoly behavior. Trading on their rep for good equipment…but too expensive for many people.

      Reply
    82. 82.

      Kristine

      January 12, 2023 at 6:24 am

      @CaseyL:

      @Ohio Mom:

      Always thought it was just me. I’d ask friends “what does that look like to you?” and get blank looks in reply.

      Reply
    83. 83.

      EmbraceYourInnerCrone

      January 12, 2023 at 6:25 am

      @Chetan Murthy: then maybe the care giver jobs need to pay more. It’s back breaking work and physically demanding. Not something you can do into your fifties and sixties for a lot of people. And the people you hell and their families can be demanding and abusive ( I realize the reverse is Also true).

      Reply
    84. 84.

      Gvg

      January 12, 2023 at 6:26 am

      @206inKY: and Tesla and Musk should be facing fines and possibly some jail sentences for horribly misleading coverups for profit that causes deaths if those stories are proved in court. Those are really blatant lies.

      Google will probably have to do some explaining after, including about how doing it right is slow, boring, careful and spelling out that they aren’t close because they don’t make false claims.

      Reply
    85. 85.

      Baud

      January 12, 2023 at 6:28 am

      Extensive’ Tesla Autopilot probe proceeding ‘really fast’, U.S. official says

      “You might say the probe is on autopilot,” she added.

      Reply
    86. 86.

      Gin & Tonic

      January 12, 2023 at 6:32 am

      Having a machine do like 95% of your job yet being ready to take over control instantly in a life-or-death situation is the exact job description of an airline pilot.

      Reply
    87. 87.

      The Thin Black Duke

      January 12, 2023 at 6:37 am

      @lowtechcyclist: Jimmy Tingle once joked that Americans would be more inclined to ride trains if you designed the individual cars of the train to look like the inside of an automobile.

      Reply
    88. 88.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 6:45 am

      But hey, humans make mistakes too therefore this is all fine I’ve been told right here in the comments of this blog

      Reply
    89. 89.

      Baud

      January 12, 2023 at 6:53 am

      @Gin & Tonic:

      That’s why there are two of them and they get a lot of training.

      Reply
    90. 90.

      Baud

      January 12, 2023 at 6:54 am

      @different-church-lady:

      Eh, this is more about the misleading marketing than the tech.

      Reply
    91. 91.

      Baud

      January 12, 2023 at 6:54 am

      @Gvg:

      Google will probably have to do some explaining after, including about how doing it right is slow, boring, careful and spelling out that they aren’t close because they don’t make false claims.

       

      No wonder Republicans think Google is liberal.

      Reply
    92. 92.

      Soprano2

      January 12, 2023 at 7:05 am

      @Brachiator: This is one thing that people who rave about remote work don’t seem to understand. Eventually your employer who lets you work at home is going to figure out that they can pay an English-speaker in India half of what they pay you for the same work. Being able to do your work anywhere has downsides.

      Reply
    93. 93.

      The Thin Black Duke

      January 12, 2023 at 7:12 am

      @Soprano2: Not everybody wants to spend three hours or more in rush hour traffic going to work for the next thirty years.

      Reply
    94. 94.

      Baud

      January 12, 2023 at 7:24 am

      @Soprano2:

      Employers have been outsourcing well before work from home became widespread.

      Reply
    95. 95.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 7:29 am

      @Baud: my observation is sort of about apologists for misleading marketing. Or maybe useful idiots for misleading marketing, perhaps.

      Reply
    96. 96.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 7:32 am

      All of you stop this right now: sometimes it makes sense for remote work and sometimes it make sense for in-person. It makes no sense to scream about which one we should force everyone to do exclusively.

      Reply
    97. 97.

      Betsy

      January 12, 2023 at 7:39 am

      @Roger Moore: Great points. I’m a transportation planner, so I’m fully on board!

      Reply
    98. 98.

      lowtechcyclist

      January 12, 2023 at 7:44 am

      @Gin & Tonic:

      Having a machine do like 95% of your job yet being ready to take over control instantly in a life-or-death situation is the exact job description of an airline pilot.

      Which is why they’re paid well to do that job, right?  And there’s two of them up there, able to take turns being the primary person paying attention.

      Also, I’m assuming that that description applies to the part of the job that takes place at cruising altitude, but that takeoffs and landings directly involve the pilot.  I’d say things can go south for a car on the highway a lot faster and more frequently than for a plane at cruising altitude.

      Reply
    99. 99.

      Baud

      January 12, 2023 at 7:51 am

      @Roger Moore:

      Kind of a tragedy of the commons situation.

      Reply
    100. 100.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 7:57 am

      @lowtechcyclist:

      Which is why they’re paid TRAINED well to do that job, right?

      Reply
    101. 101.

      Soprano2

      January 12, 2023 at 8:08 am

      @The Thin Black Duke: I understand that, but if your employer outsources your job to another country, then what are you going to do? To me it’s an affordable housing problem – it’s ridiculous that people have to live that far away from where they work. I’m lucky, I live 5 minutes from my job, but I also live in the poorer part of town where lots of people are reluctant to live (even though the neighborhood is fine).

      Reply
    102. 102.

      Soprano2

      January 12, 2023 at 8:10 am

      @different-church-lady: Yeah, OK, that’s right. I guess my objection is to the “everyone needs to work at home all the time isn’t is just wonderful” idea. LOL And it is true that if you work at home you’re definitely in danger of having your job outsourced. I figure all my co-workers who clean, repair and inspect sewers aren’t going to have their jobs shipped to China.

      Reply
    103. 103.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 8:18 am

      @Soprano2: My read on this entire argument is it’s just people using the situation as a Trojan Horse to assert either their introversion or extroversion. Nobody’s considering the actual variety of jobs in question.

      Additionally, the entire argument also assumes everyone is a knowledge/info/desk worker, which is just a first-world perspective as all shit.

      Reply
    104. 104.

      Geminid

      January 12, 2023 at 8:20 am

      @lowtechcyclist: A couple years ago I read that the Navy had landed an unmanned version of an F-18 on an aircraft carrier. I don’t think this was intended to further any near-term project but I think manned fighter planes will be obsolete before aircraft carriers are.

      I haven’t looked it up but I imagine the Navy is flying drones off of carriers and other ships. The smaller ships maybe using quad copter-type drones.

      Reply
    105. 105.

      JMG

      January 12, 2023 at 8:21 am

      Many people like driving. They love the false sense of being in control (reaction, not action is like 99 percent of driving). Surrendering control to a machine isn’t something I think automobile customers are going to go for.

      Reply
    106. 106.

      Ken

      January 12, 2023 at 8:22 am

      @lowtechcyclist: I’d say things can go south for a car on the highway a lot faster and more frequently than for a plane at cruising altitude.

      Very few deer at 35,000 feet.

      Someone said above that self-driving would need every vehicle connected to the cloud, but the non-vehicles are the trickiest situations. I wonder for example if any of the “beta-testers” has tried driving down a suburban street, and having someone bounce a ball across the car’s path to see if it brakes.

      Reply
    107. 107.

      Eyeroller

      January 12, 2023 at 8:25 am

      @Baud: Airlines are pushing to reduce the number of pilots to one.  https://www.thedrive.com/news/airlines-are-pushing-to-legalize-one-pilot-cockpits

      Of course, “technology is so good now we don’t need as many humans” is one of the excuses.

      That article has a link to another article about a commuter flight whose pilot had a medical emergency and the copilot took over and returned to O’Hare.  It is likely the pilot was unconscious (it was probably a heart attack or similar; according to the article, he died that evening).

      Reply
    108. 108.

      Bugboy

      January 12, 2023 at 8:26 am

      @Roger Moore: Free marketers have never seen an externalized cost they didn’t like…

      Reply
    109. 109.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 8:32 am

      @Ken: “When all balls are smart balls, no problem!” (Some idiot in Silicon Valley right now)

      Reply
    110. 110.

      Geminid

      January 12, 2023 at 8:36 am

      @Ken: Squirrels may be doing their own beta testing on self-driving cars.

      Reply
    111. 111.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 8:38 am

      @Eyeroller: Boston’s MBTA reduced the number of crew on any train from two to one.

      Last year some poor guy got his arm stuck in a door while he was on the platform and got dragged to his death.

      It probably wouldn’t have happened if there had been a second operator looking at the platform before the train pulled out, the way they used to before the staff reduction.

      One of the things I like about one of my main employers is they NEVER send out a single person on a job, no matter how small. This is for meaningless media work. If there’s the safety of other people involved, then deliberately putting solo employees in critical positions ought to be considered a criminal point of view.

      Reply
    112. 112.

      Soprano2

      January 12, 2023 at 8:40 am

      @different-church-lady: Not just “first world”, but it’s a class difference. At my job, there are about 10 people whose job is mostly in the office at a desk. Everyone else comes to the shop, goes to the job site, and comes back at the end of the day. Lots of people have jobs like that.

      Reply
    113. 113.

      Soprano2

      January 12, 2023 at 8:43 am

      @different-church-lady: We’ve had people suggest that we could reduce our sewer cleaning crews to one person, because some private sector companies do that. We see that as unsafe and refuse to do it, but with it being hard to hire and keep workers I can see it coming up again.

      Reply
    114. 114.

      Hoodie

      January 12, 2023 at 8:46 am

      What was that about the hedgehog knowing one big thing? I loathe Musk, but he does understand one big thing: humans will do incredibly irrational things to maintain their fantasies of individual control.

      Reply
    115. 115.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 9:36 am

      @Hoodie: Well, that’s just how sociopaths are.

      Reply
    116. 116.

      different-church-lady

      January 12, 2023 at 9:37 am

      @Soprano2: We’ve had people suggest that we could reduce our sewer cleaning crews to one person

      FUCK NO! Isn’t sewer cleaning one of the most dangerous jobs around?

      Reply
    117. 117.

      Procopius

      January 12, 2023 at 9:47 am

      For heaven’s sake, the states are the ones who allow Tesla to turn loose this software. They’re supposed to control/regulate it, but they don’t. This is particularly true in Arizona and Texas. These things have been happening at least since 2015, and Tesla keeps mislabeling the software fraudulently. I don’t believe Musk is ever going to be held accountable. If he was, he’d be in jail right now and flat broke. You hear these stories, and nothing ever happens to Tesla. There has to be a reason for that.

      Reply
    118. 118.

      EmbraceYourInnerCrone

      January 12, 2023 at 10:03 am

      @Soprano2: I never understand why companies(or anyone)  think cutting back on the  maintenance and sanitation force is a good idea.  Do they want their sewers to back up into their offices and their elevators to drop 5 floors to the bottom of the elevator shaft ? Due to lack of preventive maintenance?

      Reply
    119. 119.

      Kayla Rudbek

      January 12, 2023 at 10:08 am

      @Dangerman: that’s what the Don’t Tread On Me Virginia license plates are for!

      Reply
    120. 120.

      StringOnAStick

      January 12, 2023 at 11:18 am

      @EmbraceYourInnerCrone: I think we’re all missing the bigger picture here, though the House R’s are making it very clear.  The plan isn’t to allow there to be older or disabled people in need of care or health aids.  Oh sure, right now the plan is to starve them out of existence and destroy their access to health care by cutting Social Security and Medicare so that those dependent on these programs to live actually won’t, but it doesn’t take too much imagination to see where this leads.  They’re already conditioning their followers to kill D’s with all the eliminationist groomer/evilDemocrat crap, and I see way too many on either side who are doing the same regarding the homeless situation.  Bottom line is we won’t be seeing increased pay for healthcare aids unless they work for the wealthy.  The current trajectory is incredibly dystopian if we don’t keep the R’s out of power and the MOTU want them in power so their wealth doesn’t get taxed just to keep “useless eaters” alive; there’s a reason why right-wing and fascist governance is on the rise worldwide.

      Reply
    121. 121.

      dibert dogbert

      January 12, 2023 at 11:47 am

      Re: Tesla

      DON’T TAILGATE A TESLA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply
    122. 122.

      Tony G

      January 12, 2023 at 12:12 pm

      The Tesla executive (that Musk guy) who made the decisions to implement and market this poorly designed, poorly tested software should be In prison already.  Of course he’ll continue to get away with it.

      Reply
    123. 123.

      Paul in KY

      January 12, 2023 at 12:34 pm

      @Roger Moore: That’s a good theory.

      Reply
    124. 124.

      JaneE

      January 12, 2023 at 12:55 pm

      Self driving sounds great, and it sounds better as I get older.  I also worked in IT, and the one thing that seems consistently true is that you can never account for what a human will do.  If the self-driving feature worked perfectly on all the testbeds, I can almost guarantee a live-day-one situation will come up that it cannot handle correctly.  That is not pessimism so much as experience.

      Software is better than it used to be, but not that much.  In my day we would pound our head against the wall when a brand-new application failed for a testable condition that had been known for decades, even back then.  And as the programmer was piecing his butt back together the most common words heard were “but no one would”.  Except they did.

      Every defensive driving class teaches you to expect the unexpected.  Just because no sane person or no adult would do something, doesn’t mean that there are not crazies out there, or toddlers who can zip in front of your car without a thought.  And even a perfect system in a perfect car can have components fail.

      Computer controlled transport works really well in closed systems – metro subways or even rail systems.  Even then there are occasional problems.   My car can keep itself in the center of the lane very well on many of the highways I use.  Not all of them.  Not all of the roads I use have lines, and very rarely not even pavement.  If every car and every driver and every pedestrian did what they are supposed to do in every situation on roads that are always in a good state of repair, then maybe it could work most of the time.  I would like it to handle a wheel coming off at 65, or a flooded street concealing a pot hole deep enough to bend an axle.   I have seen both things happen.

      Reply

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    If you don't see both the Visual and the Text tab on the editor, click here to refresh.

    Clear Comment

    To reply to more than one person, click the X to save & close the box.

    Primary Sidebar

    🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

    Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
    Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

    2023 Pet Calendars

    Pet Calendar Preview: A
    Pet Calendar Preview: B

    *Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

    Recent Comments

    • opiejeanne on Entertainment Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Mr. Hackman! (Jan 31, 2023 @ 3:55am)
    • Brachiator on Entertainment Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Mr. Hackman! (Jan 31, 2023 @ 3:31am)
    • Chetan Murthy on War for Ukraine Day 340: Just a Brief Update Tonight (Jan 31, 2023 @ 3:26am)
    • AlaskaReader on Entertainment Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Mr. Hackman! (Jan 31, 2023 @ 3:26am)
    • David ⛄ 🎅The Establishment🎄 🦌 🕎 Koch on Entertainment Open Thread: Happy Birthday, Mr. Hackman! (Jan 31, 2023 @ 3:07am)

    Balloon Juice Posts

    View by Topic
    View by Author
    View by Month & Year
    View by Past Author

    Featuring

    Medium Cool
    Artists in Our Midst
    Authors in Our Midst
    We All Need A Little Kindness
    Favorite Dogs & Cats
    Classified Documents: A Primer

    Calling All Jackals

    Site Feedback
    Nominate a Rotating Tag
    Submit Photos to On the Road
    Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

    Front-pager Twitter

    John Cole
    DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
    Betty Cracker
    Tom Levenson
    TaMara
    David Anderson
    ActualCitizensUnited

    Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

    Join the Fight!

    Join the Fight Signup Form
    All Join the Fight Posts

    Balloon Juice Events

    5/14  The Apocalypse
    5/20  Home Away from Home
    5/29  We’re Back, Baby
    7/21  Merging!

    Balloon Juice for Ukraine

    Donate

    Site Footer

    Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Comment Policy
    • Our Authors
    • Blogroll
    • Our Artists
    • Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
        Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

        Email sent!