WaPo reports the inquiry into the SCOTUS leak of the Dobbs opinion draft has reached an unsatisfactory conclusion:
The Supreme Court disclosed Thursday that it cannot identify the person who leaked a draft of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the opinion that overturned Roe v. Wade.
A report from Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley said “it is not possible to determine the identity of any individual who may have disclosed the document or how the draft opinion ended up with Politico. No one confessed to publicly disclosing the document and none of the available forensic and other evidence provided a basis for identifying any individual as the source of the document.”
There’s strong evidence that Alito leaked the Hobby Lobby opinion to wealthy conservative donors weeks before the official ruling. [NYT gift link] Ask yourself who benefited from the Dobbs leak. Case closed.
Open thread.
NotMax
Don’t so quickly dismiss Thomas’ wife as the culprit.
Just sayin’.
Craig
Fuck that guy
jonas
Shit, that Alito is a piece of work, isn’t he? GW Bush was a really shitty president, whose list of shitty achievements is long, but at the top of that list are 1. Lying about WMDs and 2. Samuel Alito.
JoyceH
Ha! As soon as I saw the story on the news, I had the same reaction – it was Alito.
trollhattan
We don’t know who it is, just that it rhymes with Fanmule Burrito.
Cacti
Alito or Thomas.
Sure Lurkalot
I definitely think it’s Tinny Ghomas.
robmassing
“cannot identify” doesn’t mean they don’t know. They just are prevented from identifying because it would be too embarrassing to Sammy and the other 5 Christo-fascists.
Old School
Did they consider using enhanced interrogation methods on Politico staff?
Baud
It’s not clear that any of the justices were even interviewed.
Gravenstone
@robmassing: This, right here! It would be “inconvenient” to highlight Sammy’s duplicity in pursuit of his own power.
oatler
Fanmule!
tobie
Hmm…is John Roberts covering for his ideological compadres again? I know he didn’t side with the conservative wing in this instance but he’s still far closer to them than Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor.
trollhattan
@tobie:
“Balls and strikes.”
“Sir, this is hockey.”
Omnes Omnibus
Well, yeah.
Old School
@Baud:
That’s what I wondered.
Omnes Omnibus
@tobie: This was a performative investigation. No intent of finding a culprit.
Baud
I’m just glad a liberal wasn’t framed or scapegoated.
Feathers
This is reason enough to expand the court.
We don’t have enough circuit courts anyway. The whole Federal court system needs an overhaul.
SpaceUnit
I’ve never really understood this story. Were the conservative justices hoping to keep their ruling hush until after the 2022 elections?
UncleEbeneezer
Alito’s actions make me suspect it was him, but if we are going by who benefits most, at least idealogically, isn’t ACB the most virulent Forced Birther on SCOTUS?
mrmoshpotato
@jonas: I gotta argue that Shrub’s #1 achievement was stealing the presidency itself.
Or whoever orchestrated that. Looking at you, Darth Cheney!
JPL
What a bullshit investigation.
laura
This salty bitch wishes every bad thing that can and should befall a Sam Alito and when he kicks I’m going to dance a drunken jig in celebration. Fuck that white male christofascist shite-bag and all who’ve assisted him in his devious political decision making including Janus and Dobbs.
Baud
The only solution left is to treat Dobbs as a nullity and keep Roe in place until all of the justices who were on the Court during Dobbs are replaced.
JPL
@SpaceUnit: No. It’s possible that the leak occurred so others would not change their mind.
Omnes Omnibus
@UncleEbeneezer: Arguable. And Alito has form. He has leaked in the past.
laura
@SpaceUnit: the story is that Alito leaked the draft decision to prevent John Roberts and any others from peeling off and joining the minority of liberal justices and then he polished some wood.
Omnes Omnibus
@laura: I love your use of understatement and your decision to avoid invective.
NotMax
@SpaceUnit
Not possible, as far as I discern (IANAL). Rulings for the session are released by the end of June. New session convenes in October. Cannot put a hold on a completed ruling in order to carry it over from one session to the next.
cain
It was Alito and Ginny in the Library with a rope.
Mr. Longform
It seems clear it was a justice because they would have thrown a small fry under the bus gladly; and if it was a justice, then the chances of it being Alito and/or Thomas(es) is (scientifically) a gazillion percent.
mvr
@Mr. Longform: Yeah, I’m not sure this increases my credence in its having been a justice (it was already high), but the fact that their language is compatible with not having questioned any justices does somewhat support that theory.
Suzanne
@Omnes Omnibus:
Why this schmuck still has a job is beyond me.
Nora
@Suzanne: Because the last time a Supreme Court Justice was impeached was in 1804, and the Senate acquitted him. The whole system is set up to make it really difficult to get rid of a Supreme Court Justice, if that justice doesn’t have the integrity to resign in the face of obvious improprieties (Abe Fortas, for instance).
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus: And it wasn’t even much of a performance!
It’s not clear that they even interviewed the justices! What a joke.
ETtheLibrarian
Them doing nothing when Roberts made such a big deal out of it, always was going to mean it was a Justice (or their spouse). They would have totally hung to dry and made an example of anyone else.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
In the car about half an hour ago, an MSNBC reporter rather breathlessly informed me that they had even brought in Michael Chertoff! To which my brain responded, “Oh, so the fix was in”, which is not I think what the reporter meant to convey
Baud
@Jim, Foolish Literalist:
Apparently, Mr. Chertoff is now with The Chertoff Group.
JPL
Wallace is destroying the court and their desire to bury the report.
trollhattan
@Suzanne: Our sole hope is he decides to go hunting with Cheney.
They take the whole lifetime appointment thing seriously.
randy khan)
Alito would be my guess, too, but there easily could be a Thomas connection instead. Even just Justice Thomas taking a paper copy home and his wife making a copy that she handed to someone. I also wouldn’t be surprised if one of them gave a copy to a friend (to the extent they have actual friends and not merely functional relationships), thinking it would be kept private. Heck, it wouldn’t surprise me if copies were circulating among the anti-abortion folks for a while before it became public.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@Baud: TBH, I was confusing Chertoff with Michael Mukasey, who is much worse, but Chertoff has a pretty partisan bio
prostratedragon
@Baud: What I was thinking.
WaterGirl
@JPL: Wallace?
WV Blondie
@WaterGirl: Presumably Nicole Wallace on MSNBC. I haven’t started watching yet, but it’s recorded so I can get caught up.
Redshift
Yep, that was my immediate reaction to the headline – “not possible to determine” means “it wasn’t someone Roberts wants to publicly blame for it.”
Either Roberts already knew and the investigation was a sham, or he didn’t know exactly who but he made sure s bad result wouldn’t come out. And the Court’s tattered reputation takes another hit.
Anyone want to guess how long until Alito’s next harrumphing about how inappropriate it is to doubt the high priesthood in response to a failed investigation that we’re not allowed to see the details of?
mrmoshpotato
New Olive and Mabel!
Dogs of the Mountains
David 🌈☘The Establishment☘🌈 Koch
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Chertoff was head of DHS during Katrina.
EVERY news channel said it would be category 5 and he was surprised.
Surprise!
Typical Dubya – only the best people
JPL
@WV Blondie: Thanks. I had to step away and you’re right.
pajaro
@Redshift:
My guess, and it’s just a guess, is that Roberts did this because he felt he had to, given the bruhaha that followed the leak. I also assume he would have been fine to have discovered that some custodian did it. But there was no way he was going to try and pin it on a member of the Court, and it would have shredded the norms that exist in that building to have put the Justices under oath.
there was a Wall Street Journal article the weekend before the leak that stated that it was likely there were enough votes to overturn Roe, but that there were efforts to peel off some of the conservative Republicans. To put it mildly, the Journal does not cultivate many sources on the left. And the value of a leaker putting the article out there would be to try and nail in the votes that were there to overturn. Add to it that it was Sam Alito who did the draft, and that he has previously been willing to leak information, and my money is on him, with the Thomas family a second pick.
David 🌈☘The Establishment☘🌈 Koch
What a president should do during a disaster:
Ken B
Definitely Alito.
If Ginny had done it, she’d have bragged about in some right wing shindig on an open mic.
If Clarence had done it, Ginny would have bragged about it on an open mic.
Gin & Tonic
@Baud: I’m going to bet that’s a finite simple group.
lashonharangue
From the article
zhena gogolia
@lashonharangue: No one is above the law! Except the Supreme Court.
Elizabelle
David Crosby has died. Per The Guardian.
Ghost of Joe Liebling’s Dog
@Baud:
One would have been more’n enough; there’s more?
J R in WV
@UncleEbeneezer:
While this is true, I doubt that Amy Forced Birth has the courage to release a draft opinion like this, being newly appointed, and subject to her husband’s will as she is. On the other hand, maybe HE told her to drop it off to Politico? Then she would have no choice…
J R in WV
@pajaro:
You appear to believe that these conservative “justices” would hesitate to lie to investigators after lying bold faced to Senatorial questioners in their confirmation hearings. I doubt that — all of them would have lied without any hesitation. They are all morality free.
prostratedragon
The thought police strike on the same day as Rep. Mfume nominates Elijah Cummings for a stamp:
Of course, this is an attempt to do something even worse than policing mere thought.
Mike in Pasadena
@jonas: Let us remember condoning torture, sorry, enhanced interrogation. In Dickless Cheney’s words, “We had to go to the dark side.”
dimmsdale
Apparently Alito has claimed the leak opened up the right-wing justices to assassination attempts. Unless there were ACTUAL attempts, I find this odd and not entirely credible—lefties attempting to assassinate the Holy 6? Really?
Then the cynical me remembered the acronym DARVO–Deny the Assault, then Reverse Victim and Offender. By which, Alito might be trying to tell us that the REAL victims here are not America’s women, who’ve lost a 50-plus year constitutional right, but Sammy Alito and the rest of the Holy 6 who are threatened by the fantasy of left-wing assassination?
But that’s so cynical I almost didn’t type it out. Almost.
Frankensteinbeck
@dimmsdale:
Didn’t someone threaten Kavanaugh? I remember there was a big blow-up about it, but I don’t remember any details.
Bex
@J R in WV: They all lied in their confirmation hearings. The concept is not new to them.
MisterForkbeard
@Frankensteinbeck: Not really? If I remember right, some guy brought a gun and went to Kavanaugh’s house with the potential aim of killing him, but turned himself into police.
The gun was not loaded.
KayInMD (formerly Kay (not the front-pager))
@Frankensteinbeck: Someone Came to a street block away from Kavanaugh’s house with a gun, changed his mind, and called the police on himself. It was, if anything, a pretty inept “assassination attempt.”
Manyakitty
@NotMax: totally. She was the one I thought of.