• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. do not touch it.”

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

The real work of an opposition party is to hold the people in power accountable.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

If you voted for Trump, you don’t get to speak about ethics, morals, or rule of law.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

I swear, each month of 2025 will have its own history degree.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

Fear or fury? The choice is ours.

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

Republicans: slavery is when you own me. freedom is when I own you.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Their shamelessness is their super power.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

Giving up is unforgivable.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Nudges in Healthcare Insurance take-up

Nudges in Healthcare Insurance take-up

by David Anderson|  May 8, 20237:58 am| 4 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

JPal Poverty Lab has a recent literature review on the effect of nudges on health insurance take-up. Nudges are small changes to information, choice structures and other things that are attempts to lower administrative burdens without changing the underlying economic or legal structures. I study nudges. Several co-authors and I just submitted a grant on nudges. One of my papers was enacted into federal policy to shift the default plan for some people to get them out of strict domination. That was a nudge paper. It will lead to a few hundred thousand people seeing a different choice architecture.

However, nudges are limited.

A review of eleven randomized evaluations conducted between 2001 and 2019 that assessed the impact of various nudges aimed at increasing health insurance take-up among adults found these interventions to have a small but notable impact—both on encouraging individuals to take-up health insurance or to switch to plans with lower premiums and expected lower out-of-pocket costs to the individual.

These effects are bigger when the money is bigger:

To reduce potential choice error, consumers who were eligible for plans with higher subsidies but were enrolled in other plans were sent information regarding the higher-subsidy plans [9]. This information increased plan switching by 2 to 4 percentage points, for email-only and mail-plus-email interventions respectively (an 11 to 22 percent increase from a baseline of 18 percent). Letter recipients saved, on average, roughly $65 per year. Plan switchers saved, on average, $84 per month in premiums, or over $1000 annually, and $56 per month in reduced out-of-pocket expenses, or over $670 annually….

Choice architecture is worth doing, and it is worth doing right. Informational nudges are worth doing and worth doing right. Reminders are worth doing and worth doing right. However, they have modest effects in a complex choice space, so we should think about the choice space as a first best option and then think about nudges as second best options.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Repub Corruption Open Thread: The Latest Clarence Thomas Revelations Are Getting *Very* Personal
Next Post: What If Violence Against Pence Was Actually A Means To An End? »

Reader Interactions

4Comments

  1. 1.

    There go two miscreants

    May 8, 2023 at 10:07 am

    Letter recipients saved, on average, roughly $65 per year.

    I found this statement confusing. Is this averaged over both those who switched and those who did not? Why would that make sense?

  2. 2.

    David Anderson

    May 8, 2023 at 10:51 am

    @There go two miscreants: Correct, it is a measurement of the intention to treat/receipt of the letter versus those who never got a letter.  Structurally, it is a an average of those who got a letter and did nothing different and the effect of those who got a letter and did something (all of the incremental difference).

     

    Intention to treat is a very common practice.

    We also look at the treatment on the treated (so those who got a letter and then did something).

  3. 3.

    There go two miscreants

    May 8, 2023 at 11:24 am

    Thanks! I appreciate these posts to keep informed.

  4. 4.

    StringOnAStick

    May 8, 2023 at 6:35 pm

    I always learn something from your posts, thanks for doing them!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - way2blue - SINALEI, SAMOA—RESPITE EDITION—FEBRUARY 2025.  (second of five) 7
Image by way2blue (7/13/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • kalakal on Medium Cool – Navel Gazing! (Jul 13, 2025 @ 8:06pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Sunday Night Open Thread (Jul 13, 2025 @ 8:06pm)
  • Baud on Medium Cool – Navel Gazing! (Jul 13, 2025 @ 8:04pm)
  • comrade scotts agenda of rage on Sunday Night Open Thread (Jul 13, 2025 @ 8:02pm)
  • Burrowing Owl on Boomer Nostalgia Open Thread: Nuclear Terrors (Jul 13, 2025 @ 7:59pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!