• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Speaker Mike Johnson is a vile traitor to the House and the Constitution.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Reality always lies in wait for … Democrats.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

If you don’t believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love isn’t freedom, it is privilege.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

Jesus, Mary, & Joseph how is that election even close?

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

The words do not have to be perfect.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Roe is not about choice. It is about freedom.

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Beware of advice from anyone for whom Democrats are “they” and not “we.”

Not rolling over. fuck you, make me.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Not loving this new fraud based economy.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Reinsurance on the residuals

Reinsurance on the residuals

by David Anderson|  May 17, 20239:24 am| 8 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

This is going to be geeky, even for me.

Yesterday, we talked about a new paper about the variance of the residuals after risk adjustment.  The TLDR of that paper is that risk is risky for insurers and therefore insurers will either charge higher premiums to compensate for residual risk or find ways to screen for risk on the residual.

This got me thinking last night.  I’m done with my comprehensive exams and can devote head space to fun projects again.  One of the projects that I’m revising this morning is reinsurance.  Reinsurance is a source of funds that pay for some segment of high cost claims. The ACA has an unusual reinsurance program in that it is not the only risk equalization measure.  The ACA also has substantial risk adjustment.  This produces weird incentives.

Let’s imagine a state has a reinsurance program where it pays 50% of the claims between $50,000 and $250,000.  The maximum payment is $100,000.  Let’s work through a simple example.  Imagine an idiosyncratic event such as a failed assassination attempt by a cat who was quite disappointed that you were five minutes late feeding them, and the recovery leads to a $200,000 allowed amount on the claim, the insurer pays the first $50,000, and then splits the next $150,000 in half.  The insurer will be on the hook for a total of $125,000.  This is straightforward.  Incentives aren’t particularly weird here.

Now let’s take another $200,000 claim in the ACA.  Let’s imagine that this is for maintenance therapy for someone with well controlled hemophilia.  The insurer again pays the first $50,000 on the claim, and then splits the next $150,000 so that the net spend for the insurer is $125,000.  This is just like the cat assassination scenario.  HOWEVER THERE IS SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON.  Risk adjustment comes into play for predictable expenses.  Risk adjustment is a transfer from insurers that cover populations that code as predictably low cost to insurers whose populations code as predictably expensive.  A hemophilia diagnosis is worth about 73 times the standard statewide average premium.  This means the insurer gets a transfer receivable between $400,000 to $600,000 depending on the state.

WHAT?

This is weird.

The insurer faces a $200,000 claim but gets at least $400,000 from risk adjustment!  This is okay-ish as risk adjustment is supposed to be about group fit.  But it creates a profitable residual for the insurer for this particular individual which is what the paper we talked about yesterday plays with.  Risk adjustment assumes that on average, an insurer that gets lucky with an individual with a profitable residual  will also get unlucky with a patient in the same risk adjustment bucket who costs more than the average payment.  The residuals are assumed to sum to zero over a large enough group.  But there is more.

The insurer also gets a $75,000 payment from the state reinsurance fund.  NOW THAT IS MESSED UP!

Reinsurance is supposed to eat risk.  For a profitable residual individual, the insurer faces absolutely no tail risk.  In this scenario, reinsurance is a pure transfer to the profit side of the insurer ledger without buying out risk or anything else.

This is problematic.

States that have reinsurance programs should modify their programs so that the reinsurance payment is only paying for the residual after risk adjustment.  In the scenarios I laid out  above, reinsurance would still kick in for the cat assassination attempt but it would not kick in for the individual with well managed hemophilia.  Instead, states should, for the same budget, devote more funds to conditions that poorly risk adjust or don’t risk adjust at all such as one off genetic diseases, and conditions with high residual variance like hemophilia.  Doing that reduces selection incentives within a risk adjustment category.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « COVID-19 Coronavirus Updates: May 17, 2023
Next Post: George Santos »

Reader Interactions

8Comments

  1. 1.

    Baud

    May 17, 2023 at 9:33 am

    This is going to be geeky, even for me.

    My God! I didn’t think that was possible.

  2. 2.

    Cheryl from Maryland

    May 17, 2023 at 9:48 am

    Let me get this straight — based on your analysis, insurance companies would then like individuals with long-term, if not permanent health issues because the risk adjustment compensates them more than for single incidents.  If this is true, why the hell did my husband and I go through hell with his insurer — BC/BS Federal Employee Program, for almost every treatment for his long-term health issues (he had several, one of which, sarcoid, could not be cured, only managed) because they did the usual, nope, not paying for it until we made their lives awful?  Does BC/BS FEP just suck at handling risk adjustment?  Is it possible he had odd/unusual/unpopular health ailments which couldn’t get risk adjustments?

  3. 3.

    David Anderson

    May 17, 2023 at 9:52 am

    @Cheryl from Maryland: This only applies to the ACA program.  Other programs insurers have a strong incentive to run from risk

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    May 17, 2023 at 9:52 am

    @Baud: Try me

  5. 5.

    BradF

    May 17, 2023 at 9:56 am

    As treatments and population-level predictions are known, you can make assumptions about hemophilia patients. But unless you carve out for individual conditions–like hemophilia, how can you also account for pricey precision cancer therapy, CAR-T, and genomics? As these outlier patients will surface each year because the therapies appear quicker than the regulators can keep up, the reinsurance regime is optimal second best. It may be easier for the feds to throw these costly patients in one bucket, even if the math does not add up for certain ones.

  6. 6.

    Butch

    May 17, 2023 at 10:48 am

    @Cheryl from Maryland: BC/BS just found a whole pile of excuses to stick us with a $950 bill under our ACA insurance for a physical that was supposed to be completely covered.  We’re in an area where there’s no competition under the ACA or I’d be running away from BC/BS as fast as I could.

  7. 7.

    Damned at Random

    May 17, 2023 at 2:53 pm

    I’m so relieved to be on Medicare and out of the commercial system. My GP’s practice is not taking new Medicare patients, but I’ve was with them long before my 65th birthday. No way they are throwing me back to the wolves

  8. 8.

    Cheryl from Maryland

    May 17, 2023 at 7:11 pm

    @Butch: Sorry about that.  It hurts.  We got lucky because both of us were federal bureaucrats, and my husband was a lawyer with the FDA, so we fought it all tooth and nail and won. But it wasn’t easy, including research at the National Library of Medicine to refute the BC/BS BS claims.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - BarcaChicago  - Off the Gunflint Trail/Boundary Waters 8
Image by BarcaChicago (7/11/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • Steve LaBonne on Friday Afternoon Distraction Open Thread: Get the Passport Stamped with All the Right Signals… (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:04pm)
  • ExPatExDem on Friday Afternoon Distraction Open Thread: Get the Passport Stamped with All the Right Signals… (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:03pm)
  • Martin on Immigration Open Thread: ICE Is Wearing Out Its Welcome (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:03pm)
  • Martin on Immigration Open Thread: ICE Is Wearing Out Its Welcome (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:01pm)
  • rikyrah on Friday Afternoon Distraction Open Thread: Get the Passport Stamped with All the Right Signals… (Jul 11, 2025 @ 3:01pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!