(Image by NEIVANMADE)
Last night in comments Beautiful Plumage asked:
Hi Adam, thank you for this series.
Considering the Aussie hornets – if the training & supply/repair networks for F-16s* was so unworkable until now, what makes these planes any easier to integrate with Ukraine’s MOD? Are they similar to other UKR aircraft?
First, you’re most welcome. As is everyone else. Now to the actual question, the reason the FA/18s would be a better fit was described in detail by Tyler Rogoway at The War Room’s The Drive in April, which we referenced in an update during April. Here’s what Rogoway wrote, which answers your question:
The original plan was for Air USA to acquire 46 Hornets. Canada had bought 25 prior to the deal with Air USA to help bolster its aging CF-18 fleet. The Australian Hornets are largely upgraded to an A++ standard, which gives them the capabilities of newer F/A-18Cs, including the type’s upgraded AN/APG-73 radar.
In addition, these Hornets have never been battered around on an aircraft carrier or exposed to constant salt water during deployment. So we are talking about nearly four dozen highly relevant and well-cared-for fighters here. This is pretty much the size of Ukraine’s MiG-29 fleet, prior to recent transfers from NATO supporters, the type serving as the backbone of its current fighter force.
Yes, the F-16 has the most impressive training and support infrastructure, but the F/A-18 still has that infrastructure, as well, and will be flooded with spare parts as more Hornets retire. More on that in a moment.
In terms of capabilities and performance, the F/A-18 is arguably better suited for Ukraine than the F-16. As a twin-engine design that excels at slow-speed handling, it is more in line with Ukraine’s MiG-29 and Su-27 fleets. Its very robust carrier-capable landing gear is also better suited for Ukraine’s Soviet-era airfield infrastructure and potential for distributed and austere operations, which Ukraine has been executing to make targeting harder for Russian forces. Like the F-16, it can carry pretty much anything that would be available to Ukraine now and in the future and can be quickly adapted to handle new capabilities if need be.
While upgraded with advanced targeting pods, Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing Systems (JHMCS), and many other enhancements, the ex-RAAF jets are not cutting edge and would present reduced technological risk in their current form. This makes them deliverable with minimal modifications.
The Hornet does not need to be the final fighter answer for Ukraine, either. Maybe F-16s will one day come, but the Hornet is available right now and fits well with their existing fighter mindset. It has the potential to get Ukraine into the 4th generation Western fighter game as soon as possible.
When you factor all this in, Australia’s unwanted Hornets present an incredible opportunity. One that is literally just sitting there for the taking. But what about training? Who could get aviators and maintainers up to snuff and how fast could they do it?
But one could argue no matter what type Ukraine gets, existing governmental training pipelines are not well set up for getting aircrews into combat as fast as possible. And by any account, this takes time to achieve. Here is where the private sector could come in.
Decades of knowledge have been gained by instructor pilots and maintainers on how to teach flying and supporting these aircraft. The Hornet was the mainstay of the Navy and Marines for many years, as well as a fixture in aforementioned foreign air arms. Private contractors could step in to rapidly train Ukrainians on the Hornet outside of, or in conjunction with, the far more rigid existing government-ran pipelines.
Under such an arrangement, the syllabus could be totally tailored to Ukraine’s needs and focus on converting as many pilots as possible as fast as possible based on their own individual needs, as well. Also, the mission sets they would need to perform would be more limited, at least to start, which could accelerate training.
Without all the red tape of a government-run training enterprise, pilots and ground crew could be generated quicker and some could argue, at least under these unique circumstances, better. Even a situation where government training handles some aspects of the syllabus and contractors take care of others could be a workable solution under these incredibly tight time constraints.
There’s more at the link, but I think that answers your question. I think the first sentence of Rogoway’s article also answers Sebastian’s question about how many F/A-18s would be available.
Here is President Zelenskyy’s address from earlier today. Video below, English transcript after the jump.
The disaster at the Kakhovka HPP caused by Russian terrorists will not stop Ukraine and Ukrainians – address by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy
6 June 2023 – 22:26
Dear Ukrainians!
This day, which began with an urgent meeting of the National Security and Defense Council, continued with a meeting of the Staff. We are waiting for a meeting of the UN Security Council.
The disaster at the Kakhovka hydroelectric power plant caused by Russian terrorists will not stop Ukraine and Ukrainians. We will still liberate all our land. And each Russian act of terrorism increases only the amount of reparations that Russia will pay for its crimes, not the chances of the occupiers to stay on our land.
First of all, I am grateful to all our rescuers, military, representatives of local communities, each of our regions, who are now helping people from our southern regions flooded by the Russian terrorist attack.
Second, the government at all levels is doing everything to save people and provide drinking water to those who received it from the Kakhovka reservoir. Kryvyi Rih and the entire Dnipropetrovsk region, cities and villages in Kherson, Mykolaiv and Zaporizhzhia regions – no matter how difficult it is, we have to help people.
Third, I am grateful to everyone who is currently evacuating people from the towns and villages flooded by water from the Kakhovka reservoir. It is very important now to take care of each other and help as much as possible.
Fourth, the whole world will know about this Russian war crime, the crime of ecocide. This deliberate destruction of the dam and other HPP facilities by the Russian occupiers is an environmental bomb of mass destruction. For the sake of their own security, the world should now show that Russia will not get away with such terror. And I am grateful to all leaders and states, all nations and international organizations that have supported Ukraine and are ready to help our people and our de-occupation efforts. The Prosecutor General has already appealed to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court to involve international justice in the investigation of the dam explosion.
Today I spoke with IAEA Director Grossi, in particular about what happened to the Kakhovka reservoir and the general situation with the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. I called on the IAEA Director to directly and unequivocally condemn today’s Russian act of terrorism and to maximize our efforts to liberate the ZNPP. We agreed on his visit to Ukraine.
Fifth, it is only the complete liberation of Ukrainian land from Russian occupiers that will guarantee that such acts of terrorism will not happen again. Russia uses anything for terror – any object. The terrorist state must lose.
I want to say a few more things separately. Regarding our south and Crimea. We will find a way to restore normal life on our land after the expulsion of the ruscists. This applies to water and everything else. This applies to all our regions – from Kherson to Dnipropetrovsk, from Mykolaiv to Crimea.
The fact that Russia deliberately destroyed the Kakhovka reservoir, which is critically important, in particular, for providing water to Crimea, indicates that the Russian occupiers have already realized that they will have to flee Crimea as well.
Well, Ukraine will get back everything that belongs to it. And it will make Russia pay for what it has done.
Glory to all our people who are fighting and working for the sake of our country and our people!
Today, just like yesterday, I would like to celebrate our heroes in the Bakhmut sector… Well done, warriors! The 3rd separate assault brigade and the 57th separate motorized infantry brigade – thank you! Thank you for moving forward!
Glory to Ukraine!
Here’s some additional details, which given it’s been almost 24 hours you may have already seen, regarding the Nova Kakhovka dam.
This is a russian-made catastrophe. The world must unite to put an end to their hateful, anti-human ideology and terrorism. pic.twitter.com/IWtnMPgZUY
— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) June 6, 2023
Nova Kakhovka, Kherson region. The russians are turning occupied territories of Ukraine into deserts, ruins, and flood zones. The world must join Ukraine in putting an end to russian terrorism.
🎥 @pravda_eng pic.twitter.com/POeY5wxKpR
— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) June 6, 2023
New satellite images show the Nova Kakhovka dam before and after its destruction.
Cities along the river bank are now experiencing heavy flooding. pic.twitter.com/T4mkYhF9i4
— Brady Africk (@bradyafr) June 6, 2023
Right now I am in the center of Kherson. Water arrives very quickly, and the air smells of oil. We will feel the consequences of this disaster for decades to come. Russia is a terrorist state! pic.twitter.com/s3rNdf34df
— Oleksiy Goncharenko (@GoncharenkoUa) June 6, 2023
This is their fear.
Russians were so terminally scared of the perspective of Ukraine’s landing operation in the Dnipro’s east bank that they adhered to the worst option possible.
The Kakhovska Dam destruction is one of the biggest war crimes and acts of terror of our time.— Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦 (@IAPonomarenko) June 6, 2023
Prior to whatever happened overnight, the Kakhovka Reservoir had reached unprecedentedly high levels. This was likely due to Russian forces keeping too few gates open, the NYT reported, just months after letting the reservoir sink to historic lows: https://t.co/g9sGjPNTt9 pic.twitter.com/mKuGFakb3M
— Evan Hill (@evanhill) June 6, 2023
Here is a worst case modeling for the dam being damaged/destroyed:
IMPORTANT ADDENDUM 2023-06-06: The model have been further developed and water should start rising at Cherson city after three hours. The actual waterlevel in the dam is also higher than in the model below. Media enquires about the modelling of a dam breach at Nova Kakhovka should contact UNICEF in Ukraine who took over the initial model from Dämningsverket. THE MODELLING BELOW SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DECISIONMAKING OR INFORMATION ON WHEN TO EVACUATE. THE UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES WILL HAVE CORRECT INFORMATION.
This blogger is not an expert on hydrology, dam breaches or flooding. This blog just published a first prelminary modelling of a dam breach at Nova Kakhovka. Any interview requests will be declined.
A worst case modelling for a russian demolition of the Nova Kakhovka Dnipro river dam show that the worst flooding will take place on the left (south east) side of the river bank. A 4 – 5 m wave will hit the Antonovsky bridge east of Cherson city after 19 hours, and there will be a backswell flooding up the Inhulets river, and after 4 – 5 days there would be some flooding up the river Bug to Mykolaiv. The demolition of the Nova Kakhovka dam is a war crime according to the Geneva Convention, but Russia has already systematically broken the Geneva convention during it’s illegal war in Ukraine.
Clarification: The worst case here is that all the floodgates are blown, ie 200 meters. The entire dam is 3500 meters and in the event that 400 m or 1 800 m would be torn down the modeled time for the water to hit Cherson City would be almost halved. There would be some more flooding.
The following modelling of the worst-case dam break have been done by the Swedish hydrological engineering company Dämningsverket.
It is modeled using the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) software HEC-RAS 6.3, which is available here. The terrain data comes from Nasa.’s Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and are available from the United States Geographical Survey (USGS) here.
A model is a model. It is not reality. The CEO of Dämningsverket writes:
“As you know, all models are wrong, but some models are useful. This one is guaranteed to be wrong as I have nothing to calibrate it against, plus a host of other unknown parameters that I’ve just come up with, but I’d say it gives a picture of a worst-case scenario in case the Russians get around to blowing up the dam . I find it hard to see how it could get any worse than this, although it’s probably bad enough.”
The model is thus not based on actual measurements of the current state of the Dnipro flow, waterline, temperature, humidity, air pressure, wind speed and anytning else which would affect the model, but on assumptions for a worst case.
Assumptions include that the water-level in the dam is 13 meters above the Dnipro downstream, and that the dam break over an hour expands to a width of approximately 200 meters break in the dam.
When the wave hits the Antonivsky Bridge it will be between 4 and 5 meters of height. Wheter the severly damaged bridge would withstand the increased waterflow is not modeled.
The wave will be higher further upstream, and both speed and height of the wave is higher closer to the dam. It will take approximately 19 hours for the wave to hit Cherson City in this model, as the water spreads out over the lowlands and does not just rush forwards. The flooding will be much worse on the left side of the river (left/right side is when you are looking in the direction of the river flow, in this case towards the Black Sea – generally in this case the left side is the south or east side of the Dnipro). Most of Cherson City will not flood, but the harbour and the docklands including the island in the south of the city will be flooded.
Several smaller towns or villages on both sides of the Dnipro will be flooded and when the wave hits it will probably be very dangerous and lives will be lost.
There will be a backswell up the Inhulets river. In 4 – 5 days the swell will cause some flooding up the river Bug up to Mykolaiv. The isthmus at the end of the bay outside the Dnipro delta will be severly flooded and almost completely drowned, although this will start approximately 50 hours after the dam break.
The modelled flow will peak at 14 000 cubic meters of water per second (m3/s), which could be compared to the Niagara Falls average flow of 2 400 m3/s the Dnipro average according to Wikipedia of 1 670 m3/s. The flow will diminish over time.
This model is a worst case model and a simplification of reality as all models are. The reality will be something else if this war crime were to be commited by Russia.
Animation of the dam break below.
The model would be an indication of which areas should be evacuated if Russia were to commit the war crime of blowing the Nova Kakhovka dam. There would also be probable secondary effects including the cutting of cooling water for Europe´s largest nuclear power plant ZPP, which requires cooling even for the shut down reactors. A radiological disaster is a separate model, but with prevailing winds blowing eastwards it would generally be worse in the by Russia temporarily occupied territories or even within Russia itself if any fallout reaches the internationally accepted borders of Russia east of the Donbas. Exact results would be highly dependent on the weather conditions.
Clarificitation. In the case that 400 – 1800 meters width of the dam would break – the worst-worst-worst case and considering how the rest of the dam is constructed requiring an extremely large amount of destruction, one of the possibly biggest non-nuclear demolitions in history – the modeled time for water to reach Cherson would be almost halved and there would be some more flooding. The difference in flooding is seen below in magenta.
A video with 200, 400 and 1800 meter break below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tRYWbVD5AE
Today the Nova Kakhovka dam was severely damaged leading to a significant reduction in the level of the reservoir used to supply cooling water to the ZNPP.
The water is required for the essential cooling water system which provides cooling (among other) to the following:
- residual heat removal from the reactors (spent or partially spent fuel there);
- residual heat removal from the spent fuel ponds; and
- cooling of the emergency diesel generators (when they are running).
Absence of cooling water in the essential cooling water systems for an extended period of time would cause fuel melt and inoperability of the emergency diesel generators.
However, our current assessment is that there is no immediate risk to the safety of the plant.
The IAEA staff on the site have been informed that the damage to the Nova Kakhovka dam is currently leading to about 5 cm/hour reduction in the height of the reservoir. The team continues to monitor this rate and all other matters on the site.
The main line of cooling water is fed from the reservoir and pumped up through channels near the thermal power plant to the site. It is estimated that the water through this route should last for a few days.
Water in the reservoir was at around 16.4 m at 8 am. If drops below 12.7 m then it can no longer be pumped.
ISAMZ reported that ZNPP is making all efforts to pump as much water into its cooling channels and related systems as possible. In addition, non-essential consumers of water are being stopped at ZNPP to reduce the consumption of water.
ZNPP management is discussing further measures to be implemented.
There are a number of alternative sources of water.
A main one is the large cooling pond next to the site that by design is kept above the height of the reservoir. As the reactors have been shut down for many months it is estimated that this pond will be sufficient to provide water for cooling for some months. The Agency will confirm this very shortly.
It is therefore vital that this cooling pond remains intact. Nothing must be done to potentially undermine its integrity.
I call on all sides to ensure nothing is done to undermine that.
My trip to ZNPP next week was planned and now it is essential. I will go.
I will keep the Board informed as developments unfold.
And the follow on IAEA press release from later today:
The water level in the reservoir that is supplying Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) has been falling throughout the day, but the facility has back-up options available and there is no short-term risk to nuclear safety and security, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said.
Director General Grossi, who addressed the IAEA Board of Governors earlier today on the evolving situation at Ukraine’s damaged Nova Kakhovka dam and its impact on the ZNPP, said the loss rate had been changing, from around five centimetres per hour in the morning to nine cm/hour later in the afternoon.
Between 10 am and 8 pm local time, the reservoir fell by a total of 83 cm to 15.44 metres, according to regular data received by the team of IAEA experts present at the ZNPP.
If and when the level goes below 12.7 metres, the ZNPP will no longer be able to pump water from the reservoir to replenish the reserves at the site. As the full extent of the damage to the dam is not yet known and the water loss rate is fluctuating, it is not possible to predict exactly when this might happen. If the current rate were to continue, however, this level could be reached in the next couple of days.
Even at that low level, the existing water in the ZNPP site’s sprinkler and cooling ponds as well as the adjacent channels can still be used for some time to cool the reactors and the spent fuel pools in the reactor buildings, which could otherwise be damaged, Director General Grossi said.
In addition, a large cooling pond next to the site – the ZNPP’s main alternative source of water in the absence of the reservoir – is currently full and has enough in storage to supply the plant for several months as its six reactors are in shutdown mode, Director General Grossi said, reiterating the vital necessity for it to stay intact.
Also if needed, the site can access a deep water-filled excavation in the ZNPP cargo port area, the water system of the nearby city of Enerhodar, and use mobile pumps and firefighter trucks to fetch water.
The IAEA team was informed by the plant that it has implemented measures to limit the consumption of water so that water is used only for essential nuclear-safety related activities such as the cooling of the reactors and the spent fuel pools.
Director General Grossi noted that Ukraine had carried out stress tests following the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, including the scenario of the Nova Kakhovka dam failing.
“There is a preparedness for events like this at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant, which will help staff to handle this new challenging situation. But, clearly, this is making an already very difficult and unpredictable nuclear safety and security situation even more so,” he said.
The Director General announced he will lead another IAEA rotation next week where he will assess the situation and address the current and planned measures with the plant management.
Also today, the IAEA team of experts at the Chornobyl site reported that a fire had broken out in the forest near the Paryshev village, in a zone currently unreachable from the Chornobyl side, as the bridge over the Pripyat river had been damaged and fire trucks cannot reach it. The IAEA team were informed that it was not assessed to be a major fire. There has been no increase in the radiation levels reported to the IAEA International Radiation Monitoring Information System (IRMIS) and the fire does not present any radiological risk to the population or staff working at the Chornobyl site.
300 animals died today in the Nova Kakhovka zoo due to russia’s destruction of the Kakhovka HPP dam.
This is ecocide.
The russians want to destroy anything that is alive. pic.twitter.com/OlTdQMLkuT— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) June 6, 2023
In the Nova Kakovka, due to the destruction of the dam by Russians, the zoo/recreation center "Kazkova Dibrova" was flooded. The zoo administration says that 300 animals have died. https://t.co/GUWAkQXOuL pic.twitter.com/1JJbKwumV7
— Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (@bayraktar_1love) June 6, 2023
These are satellite images of the russian man-made disaster at the Nova Kakhovka Dam and HPP.
The scene resembles a big-budget Hollywood post-apocalypse movie. However, this is the reality of the russian world. And the perpetrators of this war crime, another crime against… pic.twitter.com/IcJeCJi84C— Oleksii Reznikov (@oleksiireznikov) June 6, 2023
Here’s the full text of Minister Reznikov’s tweet:
These are satellite images of the russian man-made disaster at the Nova Kakhovka Dam and HPP.
The scene resembles a big-budget Hollywood post-apocalypse movie. However, this is the reality of the russian world. And the perpetrators of this war crime, another crime against humanity, will appear before the International Criminal Court.
This Ukraine can guarantee.
Article 56 of Protocol I of 1977 to Geneva Conventions 1949 «dams, dykes and nuclear electrical generating stations, shall not be made the object of attack… if such attack may cause the release of dangerous forces and consequent severe losses among the civilian population».
06… pic.twitter.com/r8WvNcl4bH— Oleksii Reznikov (@oleksiireznikov) June 6, 2023
And the full text of his tweet above:
Article 56 of Protocol I of 1977 to Geneva Conventions 1949 «dams, dykes and nuclear electrical generating stations, shall not be made the object of attack… if such attack may cause the release of dangerous forces and consequent severe losses among the civilian population». 06 June, 2023. Ukraine, Nova Kakhovska dam is blown up by russia, dangerous forces are released, humanitarian disaster is triggered. Another war crime is committed by russia
Analysis from The Kyiv Independent‘s Illia Ponomarenko:
So, based on everything we have seen by the end of this day, I guess here's my humble theory regarding the Kakhovka Dam destruction:
– Russia, as an occupying power, in violation of international law and despite multiple Ukrainian pleas, completely failed to ensure the security…— Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦 (@IAPonomarenko) June 6, 2023
Here’s the full text of his tweet:
So, based on everything we have seen by the end of this day, I guess here’s my humble theory regarding the Kakhovka Dam destruction: – Russia, as an occupying power, in violation of international law and despite multiple Ukrainian pleas, completely failed to ensure the security and proper maintenance of this key facility of very special importance. – Russia, despite Ukrainian and international efforts, absolutely failed to impose a demilitarized zone surrounding this key facility, and, similarly to facilities like the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant, it absolutely failed to abstain from deploying military forces in the facility’s vicinity. – And, in the first place, by default, as an aggressor waging a destructive war of conquest and openly defying the law of war, it is directly and solely responsible for the whole of the ongoing massive loss of life and the destruction taking place in Ukraine. So it’s more than obvious that regardless of the destruction’s very immediate cause (be it Russian bombs planted or deadly Russian negligence), all 100% of the blame is on nothing but Russia. I guess no one is taking seriously a dumb conspiracy theory saying that the dam could be destroyed by Ukraine — for the sake of… causing a major technological disaster, with over 80 cities and towns flooded and the whole region affected, in a territory it pursues to liberate from the foreign aggressor to no substantial military effect? With or without the major flooding, Ukraine is not even close to seriously expecting a successful and decisive landing operation in the Dnipro east bank, due to very obvious challenges and complexities. So, given the fact that the sudden disaster also seriously affected Russia’s military presence in the region — I guess the most probable answer is that Russians fucked things up. Yes, AGAIN. As they often do. They absolutely failed to ensure the dam’s proper operation, especially given its poor condition, and, knowingly committed gross violations, very possibly due to the fear of a possible limited Ukrainian assault from across the Dnipro. Fucking around and finding out, Vol. 45633. Knowing what Russia and its system is, the insane stupidity, IMHO, feels like a very likely answer. The result is what we’re seeing now live. An insane tragedy for Ukraine that we will have to deal with for decades to come. However, the dildo of consequence is coming soon, too. Again.
Ponomarenko is referring to this:
S-125 ❌| 'The Dildo of Consequences' ✅
— Oryx (@oryxspioenkop) June 4, 2023
Analysis from the Ukrainian officer who tweets as Tatarigami:
Regardless of how russians destroyed this dam, it is undeniably clear that the russia bears full responsibility for this incident. The true magnitude of this catastrophe has yet to be fully comprehended.
However, as reported by the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food, the… pic.twitter.com/ggGJin8paD— Tatarigami_UA (@Tatarigami_UA) June 6, 2023
Here’s the full text of his tweet:
Regardless of how russians destroyed this dam, it is undeniably clear that the russia bears full responsibility for this incident. The true magnitude of this catastrophe has yet to be fully comprehended. However, as reported by the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food, the destruction of this dam has resulted in 94% of the irrigation systems in the Kherson region, 74% in the Zaporizhia region, and 30% in the Dnipropetrovsk region being deprived of a water source. Given the ongoing war and the scale of this problem, there is no quick solution in sight. The consequences of this disaster will have a lasting impact on the Ukrainian people and nations that rely on Ukrainian food supplies for their food security in the years to come. The displacement of thousands of individuals from their homes and the complete devastation of entire ecological systems is a serious issue. It demands an urgent and decisive response from the international community that surpasses mere expressions of concern and verbal condemnations. Immediate action is necessary to address and mitigate the far-reaching consequences of russian actions.
Satellite images of the flooded territories of the Kherson region. Nova Kakhovka, Kozatske, Korsunka, Krynkyhttps://t.co/j4jouN2a69 pic.twitter.com/gceLFGr4zb
— Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (@bayraktar_1love) June 6, 2023
A police officer in Kherson rescues a dog trapped and drowning in floodwaters as a result of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant dam explosion on June 6.
📽️: National Police of Ukraine pic.twitter.com/TBsBtY6LoH— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) June 6, 2023
This is what makes me proud of Ukrainians. Hours after Russia caused catastrophic disaster by blowing up the dam, hundreds of people began to collect aid, volunteering to help people and animals. Many risk their lives as Russia continues shelling the right bank of Dnipro. pic.twitter.com/rGXlzDgZfN
— Maria Avdeeva (@maria_avdv) June 6, 2023
The Russians blew the dam for four reasons. The first is it fits within their ongoing genocidal strategy to destroy anything and everything that is Ukrainian. The second is that blowing the dam takes a major source of power generation – the Nova Kakhovka Hydrological Power Plant – offline. Up until last night Ukraine was not only supplying most of its own power, but was also exporting significant power to the EU. With the NKHPP offline, both of those things become much, much harder. The third is the destruction of significant agricultural lands offline by flooding them. Getting them back up and under cultivation is not just waiting for the flood waters to recede, they are going to have to be decontaminated. This means that it is now harder for Ukraine to feed itself as well as to export agricultural products to the rest of the world. As a result, food prices are likely to rise again. And in areas of the global south, food insecurity will significantly increase. In many of the global south states and societies Russia and the PRC have already won the information war and they dominate the information environment. As such, don’t expect the citizens of those states to recognize that it is Russia’s actions that has led to their further immiseration. Finally, by flooding the Dnipro, the Russians have made it harder for the Ukrainians to conduct riparian/riverine operations across the Dnipro against Russian positions.
Bakhmut:
Meanwhile, in the Battle of Bakhmut, confirmed Ukrainian advances at Berkhivka & local pond. pic.twitter.com/tT9ttooUOs
— Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦 (@IAPonomarenko) June 6, 2023
You may be asking what Ukrainian air defense is doing?
Last night, russians attacked Ukraine with 35 cruise missiles Kh-101/Kh-555.
ALL OF THEM WERE SHOT DOWN.
Glory to Ukraine's air defenders!@KpsZSU— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) June 6, 2023
It is air defensing!
That’s enough for tonight.
Your daily Patron!
Just another terrorist attack? No, it is planned ecocide. russia is trying to kill everyone and everything in Ukraine. And they will never stop on their own. We should stop them. #StopEcocideUkraine https://t.co/dDeCDMnIGk
— Patron (@PatronDsns) June 6, 2023
Animal rescuers are already working in the Kherson region. They will search for surviving animals to save them. We need your help! My PayPal [email protected] and the link https://t.co/piNaS1FDxB pic.twitter.com/nFOGfYb0fF
— Patron (@PatronDsns) June 6, 2023
And +
Thank you❤️ pic.twitter.com/zME6vkmPsM— Patron (@PatronDsns) June 6, 2023
For those wondering, 46,723.95 Ukrainian hryvnia equals $1,264.23 at today’s exchange rate of 36.96 hryvnias to $1.
Open thread!
BeautifulPlumage
I missed that in April. I appreciate your posting it again. It does answer my whole question.
Alison Rose
I want to scream. I’ve been reading about this all day and I feel so damn helpless and I just want to scream. The fact that there are still people who are stupid and/or evil enough to still support russia makes my brain melt. It’s like putin once saw someone call Hitler history’s greatest monster and is like “hold my beer” every single day.
Sigh. Thank you as always for keeping us informed, Adam. I’m grateful that we have you here, knowing we will get accurate and well-informed analysis and information, whether your own or from others who you trust.
Adam L Silverman
@Alison Rose: Trust no one! Suspect everyone!
Adam L Silverman
@BeautifulPlumage: You’re welcome and no worries. I’m not giving quizzes.
David Anderson
Regarding NATO and UKRAINE membership possibilities, at what point does the Ukrainian government have a series of very quiet off the record conversations where they make the simple point that one way or another, Ukraine will have a viable nuclear deterrent and the choice NATO has is whether or not it is multilateral and survivable of a first strike or unilateral and launch on warning
Omnes Omnibus
@Adam L Silverman: Fuck it. I’m not doing the reading then.
Alison Rose
@Adam L Silverman: There are three people I trust: You, my mom, and Keanu Reeves.
BeautifulPlumage
Given the scale of this action, what more would it take to get NATO involved to remove any more Russian offensive action? That’s the place my mind goes after reading about the flooding. I know that, realistically, NATO is doing what it can, but, geez, this is as horrific as all of their other countries crimes.
At least they screwed over some of their positions.
RELEASE THE HORNETS!
jonas
This is up there with Saddam ordering the blowing of all the Kuwaiti oil wells at the end of the Gulf War: economic terrorism and mass ecocide as a last act of desperation by a tyrant who knows he’s losing/has lost. He and Putin deserve the same fate.
Gin & Tonic
In an elegant stroke of timing, the UN announced today as the day of the russian language. Indeed: russian is the language of genocide.
zhena gogolia
@Gin & Tonic: They DID?
zhena gogolia
@Gin & Tonic:
Ёб твою мать, действительно.
Omnes Omnibus
@Gin & Tonic: Wow. Just wow.
Alison Rose
@Gin & Tonic: THE FUCK????
Betty
I was furious watching the PBS Newshour as the anchor kept repeating how we can’t know which side is responsible for this catastrophe. As if Ukraine would certainly help destroy its own land and people.
Mallard Filmore
@jonas:
Speaking of Saddam, the latest video from YouTuber “Jake Broe” …
https://youtu.be/igB0By6vT9Y
… has a segment where Vladimir Saldo, head of the annexed Kherson Oblast, says everything is normal …
https://youtu.be/igB0By6vT9Y?t=971
… while standing in front of a picture window overlooking the flooded square of his office complex.
A bit later in the video he does a segment …
https://youtu.be/igB0By6vT9Y?t=1311
… on the exploits of the Russian Volunteer Corps and how the RU military has not kicked them out yet.
It appears that Russia has the third best army in the Ukrainian theater.
Omnes Omnibus
@Betty: “What is truth? said jesting Pilate; and would not stay for an answer.”
Maxim
Fuck Russia sideways with a rusty pitchfork. Repeatedly.
@Alison Rose: In case you haven’t already seen it: https://www.tiktok.com/@unreal_keanu/video/7146204821958217002?lang=en
Kyle Rayner
@zhena gogolia:
Wow. It’s not just “that’s the language the aggressor of an ongoing war speaks.” This PARTICULAR language is involved in a war of colonialism/imperialism/genocide, so it’s more like “that’s the language the aggressor would force upon all Ukrainians given the chance, has done so in the past, and is currently doing to all the children it kidnapped.”
Andrya
@Betty: Unfortunately, the New York Times and the Washington Post did the same thing. Neither gave the slightest hint that russia was even the more likely suspect. Grrrrr!
Anonymous At Work
The dam breach is bad news, and I don’t want to take away from it, but I want to know what happens to the river next. How much does the river need the dam for flood control? Will the breach result in an easier river to cross once the reservoir is drained? What happens to the minefields and field fortifications that Russia erected along the eastern bank?
Also, I want to follow-up on David’s comment about nuclear deterrent. Any pause in operations that doesn’t include EU/NATO membership, isn’t the EU/NATO telling Ukraine to re-arm itself with nukes to use as a deterrent? Isn’t Ukraine trying to tell EU/NATO “Either we have nukes as part of your rules and operations, or we have nukes outside your rules and operations.”?
Gin & Tonic
@Omnes Omnibus:
Adam L Silverman
@Anonymous At Work: My understanding is that the river was expected to crest at 11 AM local time in Ukraine today.
Manyakitty
@zhena gogolia: and on the International Day of the Child or some such nonsense. I suggested that they take note of the tens of thousands of Ukrainian children who were ripped from their homes and kick the perpetrator off the security council if they wanted anyone to take them seriously. 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
japa21
@Gin & Tonic:
There are certain times when the past is a good predictor of the present. The dam is certainly consistent with everything Russia has done over the past couple decades, and not only in Ukraine.
Mallard Filmore
Many of the mines are floating away, and then exploding at random location down river.
Freemark
@Mallard Filmore: Or actually worse, not exploding. The issue with these mines will be going on for decades for anyone using the river.
YY_Sima Qian
This act of Russian vandalism reminds me of the notorious breaching of the Yellow River dykes at Huayuankou by the KMT regime in 1938, early during the Anti-Japanese War. The IJA was driving down south across the Northern China plains, w/o effective Chinese resistance. The breaching & the resultant massive flooding changed the course of the Yellow River, destroyed huge tracts of prime farmland, killed tens of thousands of Chinese civilians during the immediate flooding & hundreds of thousands in the subsequent famine & plagues. It did slow down the IJA onslaught for a couple of months, & forced it to instead march west up the Yangtze River valley. A couple of IJA divisions caught in the flooding were scattered for a time & mauled. However, the decision has remained extremely controversial since, & the CCP has used it effectively against Chiang Kai-Shek in its propaganda during the subsequent Chinese Civil War. Indeed, after the flooding receded, the Communist forces entered the vacuum & set up base areas in the flooded regions, & the area became a strong bastion of support to the CCP.
Of course, unlike Putin, Chiang was executing a scorched earth strategy to slow down a foreign invasion, but also damaging Chinese territory & killing Chinese civilians.
Now would be a good time for all the “Straddlers” to explicitly criticize actions that heighten the risk of nuclear disaster, but I am not sure they will, other than mealy mouthed “concerns”.
OverTwistWillie
@Anonymous At Work:
It provided power and water for what was the industrial heartland of the Soviet Union. Once the flood subsides, the silt will hard pan and blossom quickly. The military reality is armies have been crossing rivers forever. Will they? Where and when? I’m not on that planning committee.
Bill Arnold
@Betty:
Ukraine doesn’t even have the technical capability to destroy a structure like a concrete dam controlled by Russian forces. What’s the story? That the USSR placed demolition charges during dam construction in the 1950s and Russia never found them?
There have also been persistent reports that Russia placed demolition charges after they seized the dam.
And no matter the cause of the failure, Russian demolition or Russian incompetence; it was still under Russian control, so the failure is Russia’s fault.
I’ve also a rant about the destruction of a 350 MW source of low/zero carbon electricity. Might post it later after rechecking estimates.
zhena gogolia
@Bill Arnold: How can the media even question who is responsible? It was in Russian control.
Manyakitty
@zhena gogolia: seriously. This both-sidesing is beyond irresponsible. WTAF. 🤬
Gin & Tonic
@Bill Arnold: People with a stronger constitution than I have apparently watched the first episode of Tucker Carlson’s new “show” on Twitter. You’ll be shocked to learn he spent most of it blaming Ukraine for blowing up the dam.
Bill Arnold
@zhena gogolia:
Impressed that it already has a wikipedia page:
Destruction of the Kakhovka Dam
The press needs to stop reflexively believing Russian spokespeople.
Omnes Omnibus
@zhena gogolia: At the very least, any claim that Ukraine did it should be subject to the extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence rule.
YY_Sima Qian
@zhena gogolia: Even if one assumes that Ukraine only acts in the most cynical manner (which is more Putin’s MO), flooding the area only slows down any Ukrainian attempt to advance toward the isthmus connecting Crimea.
Mallard Filmore
The YouTuber “ATP Geopolitics” put out a video today …
link: https://youtu.be/fosomnXWD9Y
title: ” Ukraine War Upd. EXTRA (20230606): Analysing Russian Losses – A Data Gift to You ”
… discussing a spreadsheet that one of his commenters (“Del”) made available:
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=E33161B435D127BA%21115352&ithint=file%2Cxlsx&authkey=%21AIUgFlGIk8-n1hM
… showing extensive breakdowns of Russian daily (!!!) losses over their time at war. One of the comments to this video says “This data is gold for anyone with experience in statistical/data analysis. This dataset provides a foundation for much more detailed analysis than is provided in the included charts. Thanks for doing the tedious legwork compiling this dataset Del, fantastic job 👏 “
OverTwistWillie
@YY_Sima Qian:
The Yellow is like the Lower Mississippi. Heavy sediment loads build up a natural levee that humans raise to the point the water level is above the flood plain.
The Kakhovka damn wasn’t built until 1950. In 1941 Stalin blew the next damn upriver at Zaporizhzhia, killed a bunch of Ukrainains and Soviet soldiers. It didn’t do much to slow the German advance.
trollhattan
Vlad’s willingness/eagerness? to destroy the dam-powerplant complex and unleash more than 10-million acre-feet of impounded water has me wondering what his Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant might be? It seems far more possible, today.
The Oroville Dam spillway response-repair cost about a billion, in total. Repairing this would seem far more costly and the better chunk of a decade to accomplish. In peacetime Ukraine.
Sigh
Alison Rose
@Gin & Tonic: I’ve never seen anyone simp so hard for someone as Tucker does for putin.
Chetan Murthy
@trollhattan:
Esp. the absence of any serious blowback from the West. We needed to do something significant to punish Vova, and we’ve done nothing so far. I don’t know what we could do [that would *not* escalate into a nuclear confrontation], but surely we can come up with something.
He’s getting the feedback that he can commit these massive war crimes and get away with it. This is the wrong message to be giving him.
OverTwistWillie
I suppose it is possible the Luka was visiting someone in hospital and they slapped some gauze on him in a bit of misdirection.
Another Scott
@zhena gogolia: The ATC report I heard on NPR this evening mentioned the dam had been overtopped a few months ago because, supposedly, the russians weren’t running it properly. Someone speculated that that could have weakened the dam.
The water level graph above doesn’t make that obvious to me. The high water mark seems to have been just in the last few days.
If one did want to blow up a dam to do as much damage as possible, one would obviously want the water level to be as high as possible. And, goodness, will you look at that – the water level was pretty darn high…
I too was disgusted that NPR was both-sidesing the story. I don’t know enough about this stuff to have an informed opinion about what caused it to fail. Maybe they’re right in this case that there’s not enough evidence of explosives. Maybe deliberate russian operational actions were sufficient to cause it to fail.
Whatever the case, VVP’s forces are responsible and both-sidesing it is irresponsible.
My $0.02.
Cheers,
Scott.
YY_Sima Qian
@OverTwistWillie: I was not aware that Stalin had tried the same tactic in 1941. This might be the better parallel to what Putin just did.
OverTwistWillie
@YY_Sima Qian:
https://www.rferl.org/a/european-remembrance-day-ukraine-little-known-ww2-tragedy/25083847.html
Rich Gardner
As I’m sure people know, Tucker Carlson has just taped his first show for Elon Musk. It’s at https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1666203439146172419
I watched the first few minutes. Carlson feels that as the “Ukrainian side” of the Dnipro suffered less damage than the “Russian side” does, ergo, Ukraine must have destroyed the plant! Never mind that Russia is just temporarily occupying that chunk of Ukraine and may soon be ejected from it.
YY_Sima Qian
@OverTwistWillie: Thanks for the link!
Sebastian
Holy smokes, what an update! Thank you for the F-18 clarification.
I was wondering how the changed water levels upstream will affect bridging operations. Are there any forecasts or modeling of how long the land downstream will be flooded?
Sebastian
@trollhattan:
We have to expect the worst from Russia in Energodar.
Manyakitty
@Sebastian: here’s a gift link for a WaPo article discussing your question:
https://wapo.st/45Po3YA
Sebastian
@Manyakitty:
Thank you!
Chetan Murthy
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!
https://politicalwire.com/2023/06/06/mccarthy-pumps-the-brakes-on-ukraine-funding/
“McCarthy Pumps the Brakes on Ukraine Funding”
Chetan Murthy
Awwwwww…..
https://nitter.net/igorsushko/status/1666219269640826887#m
video at link
Manyakitty
@Sebastian: my pleasure!
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: he’s loathsome. And what a day to announce it. Soulless ghouls, every one.
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: whomp whomp. More like this.
Chetan Murthy
@Manyakitty: I saw a vid yesterday of Russian colonists in Crimea lining up to flee — apparently they got the hint when the NK dam went bust. And yeah, “whomp whomp”.
Redshift
@Chetan Murthy:
We’ll see. I’m inclined to credit the previous reports that Biden got Ukraine funding as part of the deal. McCarthy may think he can just change his mind on that, but I suspect he’ll find out what we all know, that he got rolled and it’s not that easy.
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: right, so here’s my question: admittedly, I don’t even know what I don’t know, but is there a way for NATO to extend some kind of protected status to Ukraine? Then maybe launch a coordinated attack on Russian targets within Ukraine?
This nonsense about not wanting to escalate was stale before it hatched. Putin will keep pushing until Ukraine is a sheet of glass. Time to end this.
What’s it going to take?
Sebastian
@Manyakitty:
The article is good (and depressing to read) but unfortunately doesn’t answer the very particular thing I am hunting for. I am trying to gauge when the water will recede and the mud will dry because it would change the battlefield massively.
According to a thread by a German firefighter I read yesterday, the dried mud is as hard as concrete, might also cover minefields and defensive structures like trenches and bunkers, and change the distance for bridging operations.
I am sure I am not the only one thinking along these lines.
Manyakitty
@Sebastian: i think I read something about 72 hours for the water to recede, but the article said it would take weeks for the full effects to clear out, so somewhere in between? I think the same article (what’s not a blur anymore?) said the resulting hardened silt would end up making it easier to cross the river.
Carlo Graziani
While the considerations that you name are all key factors, in my view this one comes first, not fourth. The Russians are within days of having to welcome a counteroffensive whose schwerpunkt they are still uncertain about. By blowing the dam, they have closed off a set of possibilities for the immediate future, which allows them to redirect defensive resources to the other potential theatres.
Had the pricipal considerations been ethnocide, or sabotage of Ukrainian power generation and agriculture, they would have blown the dam months ago, rather than now. The timing of the act tells us what we need to know: the Russian military is panicking about that incoming unlubed dildo, and whatever politically-motivated “restraint” prevented them from destroying the dam earlier has been overriden by their expectation of a coming crisis.
Chetan Murthy
I put @JuliaDavisNews into my YT subscriptions, and watch every clip she translates. Goddamn, these RU state propagandists are really on the same page! They’re all on the “plunge Ukraine into darkness, destroy everything, destroy all infrastructure, drive 20m Ukrainians to the EU, make it hell!” tack now. Just amazing to see.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caASWGfmQr8
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: hence my response to your comment.
Chetan Murthy
@Manyakitty: It has been reported widely that we’ve warned RU that use of an atomic device will bring NATO to kill everyone and everything in the chain of handling of that device, back into Russia. Several NATO countries have said that a radiological incident due to an attack at the Zaporozhzhia NPP will be treated as an attack on NATO, and again, NATO will attack RU forces in Ukraine.
But my fear is, this arguably extremely large disaster, caused by RU’s attack on an off-limits piece of infrastructure, seems to be yielding no response from NATO or the West. Nothing. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Given that Zelenskiyy has been warning for months that RU had mined the dam, and begging the West to intercede to prevent it being blown, one would have thought that the West would at *least* have a plan already formulated for their response.
I mean, setting aside the massive humanitarian catastrophe, the people dying, losing their homes, etc, setting all that aside, if the West does not respond and punish Putin somehow (I am *not* saying militarily — to be absolutely clear) then that will just make him more likely to take the next step in escalation: to blow the ZNPP, or maybe think about a nuclear device. This is how unanswered escalation works, after all: the escalating party, meeting no response, thinks “OK, that worked, let’s do more!” And if RU uses a nuke, then we’re forced to respond, and maybe that ends the world. We need to deter Putin from using that nuke, and the best way to do that is to make the *cost* of blowing the dam so goddamn enormous that he’ll think twice about escalating anymore.
For starters, simply expropriate every single asset of RU and every RU oligarch and their family and hangers-on. Do it now, don’t bother with legal niceties. Just do it. Throw the wives and children of these oligarchs out onto the street, let them find their own ways home. Throw Putin’s ex-wife and her boytoy out onto the street. Make every oligarch livid with rage at Putin for what he’s done to them. It’s not an act of war. It’s not kinetic in the least. And RU does it whenever they want in Russia anyway. So do it.
Chetan Murthy
@Manyakitty:
I’m sorry, but this is not on the cards. The only way that NATO can get involved, is if Russia crosses a line first. And I don’t think that blowing the KHPP was such a line. We don’t have to like it, for it to be true. As Cheryl Rofer explained near the beginning of this war, the most important thing in nuclear brinkmanship is to be *predictable*, so that your adversary knows what will happen if they make move X. If we suddenly become unpredictable, making a response Y that they didn’t expect, then they can and will think we’re jumping levels in the escalation ladder, and can end up doing the same themselves. And we’ll all end up as sheets of glass (or at least, me and my family here in central SF).
NATO and the collective West need to find non-military means to hurt Putin, and to hurt him *badly*. And it’s not like they don’t exist. There are plenty of them available, if we just had the balls to use them without dithering for twelve fucking months.
Chetan Murthy
@Sebastian: It’s a pity we don’t have a hydrologist in the commentariat, isn’t it? I read that the water would recede in about 2wk *downstream of the dam*. Given that it’s a transient event, one would expect that the mud would dry fast after that, but …. again, wish one of us were a hydrologist.
Upstream ….. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQbQXUxfhGM (no idea what his qualifications are, but he’s been reliable in reporting the war events, for what that’s worth) said that UA will be planning *amphibious crossing* the Dnipro *upstream of the dam* pretty soon, b/c of course the channel will get narrower there. This might make sense if they were already planning amphibious operations downstream — just shift ’em upstream. And since you already have the boats and such, just use ’em the same way you were going to use ’em already. But again, gosh, I have no idea. Maybe he’s right.
One thing though: I would be shocked if lake bottom dried out fast after having been immersed for 75yr and silted-up the entire time.
Wish we knew any hydrologists.
Chetan Murthy
@Manyakitty: I’m 100% with you, and (to paraphrase a commenter over at dKos) am musing about Moscow as a sheet of glass. It’s not a good place to be. The thing is, our leaders are *not* going to risk nuclear escalation: they simply are *not* going to do it. We can make all the arguments we want for why it’s not a risk: they still won’t do it.
And truthfully, I’m OK with that. We *do* have enough non-military levers that we could use to make live intolerable for Putin and his henchmen. We just need to use them.
Carlo Graziani
@Manyakitty: Two answers:
(1) Barring Russian use of nuclear or chemical weapons, NATO intervention is a political impossibility, and the attempt would probably fracture the alliance. Contrariwise, the threat of NATO intervention is almost certainly what has preserved Ukraine from battlefield nuclear weapons use so far. It would be a bad trade to give up that restraint for the sake of punishing the dam breach.
(2) Even setting aside the possible escalation worries—which should not be dismissed lightly—if we look to the political aftermath of the war, the situation of Ukraine with respect to Russia and the West will likely be far more advantaged if the Ukrainians succeed in liberating themselves than if NATO steps in to expel the Russians. A defeat by the UA is much more politically devastating to Putinism than a defeat by NATO, however well-supplied by the West the UA may be. And it’s just as important to think about winning the peace as the war.
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: these are my exact concerns. Your suggestions are reasonable. Hopefully, similar plans are imminent, but I’m not holding my breath.
Chetan Murthy
@Manyakitty:
Unfortunately, they’re not. RU has paid-off too many officials and elites in the West for the kind of mass expropriation and expulsion needed to actually hurt Putin. It’s a simple fact. The Ukrainians must pay for our greed.
Manyakitty
I figured.
This bit right here:
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: thanks for the thoughtful response, by the way.
Chetan Murthy
@Manyakitty: We’re all processing anger and grief for Ukraine, and have been for over a year.
Manyakitty
@Carlo Graziani: that also makes sense. I figured as much, especially with people like Orban in the mix.
Thanks for your response. 🙏
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: that sucks.
Manyakitty
@Chetan Murthy: ugh. That’s a fact. 😣
Chetan Murthy
@Manyakitty:
I don’t think it’s b/c of Orban. Can you imagine the American citizenry supporting Biden if he called for the US to enter the war on Ukraine’s side? I cannot. This is why he’s s steadfast and *clear* in saying that American soldiers will not enter the war. And I think the same would be true all over Europe, except in the front-line CEE states. And even [setting aside Hungary] in many of those, I’d bet they’d be unwilling to enter the war *today*.
People don’t want to die. They don’t want their children to die in a nuclear holocaust. They’ll do a lot to avoid it. They’re not wrong.
Sebastian
@Chetan Murthy:
Thanks! I’ll watch the video later.
Jinchi
That was my thought as well. They’re stretched out over too much territory, they’re having to redeploy troops to protect themselves far to the North in Belgorad, and this allows them to collapse the frontlines and redeploy troops in preparation for Ukraine’s counterattack.
It probably seems very smart to them in the immediate near term. They’re trying to buy time.
Mousebumples
Thanks, as always, for these updates, Adam! I appreciate your expertise.