The Affordable Care Act requires insurers to spend 80% of qualified premiums on a combination of claims and quality improvement projects. If, over a rolling three year window, an insurer does not do that, the insurer has to send checks out to enrollees to make up the difference. The Kaiser Family Foundation tracks and estimates future MLR rebates every year. The 2021-2022-2023 estimates are up and it is a nothingburger:
We expect some level of rebates if we think that insurers target a regulatory MLR a smidge above 80%. I say a smidge because the administrative costs of sending out checks is fairly high. But with a target, there are misses. Some misses are high. Some misses are low. If there are consistently low misses, then the MLR rebates are sent out.
We saw from 2019 to 2021 that there were large individual market MLR rebates due to Silverloading — insurers jacked up premiums but enrollment stayed mostly constant and risk stayed fairly flat. There were concerns in 2020 that COVID would crush claims as everyone avoided anything that was vaguely avoidable. By now, we’re not seeing any of that showing up in the data. From this point of view, we’re back to normal statistical noise.
jonas
So if I’m reading this right, in 2020-21, insurers jacked premiums way up (viz. the Silverloading) to cover their exposure to Covid, but overshot the mark and ended up refunding a bunch of money. How did that happen? Were Covid claims actually *less* expensive/extensive than anticipated? Was that because of the efficacy of the vaccine? Or were they saving money on elective surgeries and other routine procedures that didn’t happen because of Covid?
David Anderson
@jonas: nope 2021 rebates were due to high 2018. 2019 2020 premiums, all set pre covid
jonas
@David Anderson: Ah, understood.