Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When I was faster i was always behind.

I am pretty sure these ‘journalists’ were not always such a bootlicking sycophants.

Republican speaker of the house Mike Johnson is the bland and smiling face of evil.

Republicans do not trust women.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

Dumb motherfuckers cannot understand a consequence that most 4 year olds have fully sorted out.

Conservatism: there are people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

“woke” is the new caravan.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

“I was told there would be no fact checking.”

So very ready.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

SCOTUS: It’s not “bribery” unless it comes from the Bribery region of France. Otherwise, it’s merely “sparkling malfeasance”.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Stop using mental illness to avoid talking about armed white supremacy.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

Human rights are not a matter of opinion!

With all due respect and assumptions of good faith, please fuck off into the sun.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

You are here: Home / Political Fundraising / Targeted Political Fundraising 2025-26 / The Civics Center / PA Supreme Court Effort – 6x Matching!

The Civics Center / PA Supreme Court Effort – 6x Matching!

by | 36 Comments

This post is in: , ,

Update:  Ask and we shall receive.  Wowser, big thanks to the person who fixed this!

h/t BlueGuitarist for the video which had this organize image on a protest sign!

I did the best capture I could, t’s a bit crooked, so if any of you geniuses out there could fix that, I would appreciate it!

Sorry I kind of fell off the map for couple of days; big project for one of my clients this week.

Happy to say that we have a DOUBLE external match for the next $12,500 in donations.  And right now we have the second half of PatrickG’s Angel Match.  And right after that we have one more $1k Angel match waiting in the wings.

So for the next $1,500 in donations up to $50 per person, it’s a 6x match.  PatrickG Angel match is complete.

So for the next $1,000 in donations up to $50 per person, it’s a 6x match.

I’ll do the math so you don’t have to!

$50 donation ($50) + Angel match ($50) = $100.   Add external match #1 ($100) + external match #2 ($100) = $300!

Step right up!

Remember, the fine print.  Angel matches reset each time there’s a new Angel match, so for those who can afford it, if you give $50 to the PatrickG Angel match and another $50 to the upcoming Anonymous Angel match, your $100 turns into $600!  Pretty hard to beat that, if you have the disposable income, which not all of us do! :-)

Read more about the effort in the original post earlier this week:

Exciting New Effort, With An Eye Toward the PA Supreme Court Retention Election In November

 

Reader Interactions

36Comments

  1. 1.

    WaterGirl

    With the Angel match and the external double match,  $50 becomes $300.  (6x)

    With just the external double match (without the Angel match) $50 becomes $150.  (3x)

    To be Angel matched, tell us about your donation in the comments or by email to me.

    Let’s get this done before while ActBlue is still here

    *If any attorneys – or anyone else more knowledgable about this than I am – can weigh in on how Trump can possibly shut down ActBlue, I would love to hear your thoughts.

  2. 2.

    Professor Bigfoot

    I was trying to hold off for a bit to see if May’s SS shows up, but I’m in for $50.

  4. 4.

    WaterGirl

    Heading out to run an errand, back soon.

    edit: Well, that was fast. Go about 1.5 miles from home and had to turn around. The Illinois Marathon is happening this morning, and they have a ton of streets closed off. It’s pretty cold, 47 degrees this morning, but maybe that’s good if you’re running a marathon?

  9. 9.

    Redshift

    In for $50!

    I’m also about to head out to a fundraiser for our school board chair, Karl Frisch. (If you’re a Stephanie Miller listener, you may have heard him on air occasionally.)

  12. 12.

    BellyCat

    The PA Supreme Court needs as many NEW DEMS as possible.  I could, and someday will, elaborate, but retention just for the sake of retention might not be in the best interests of those who believe in the natural goals of justice. Each judge needs to be considered individually, beyond their label.

  15. 15.

    Another Scott

    +$50+

    Thanks for the matchy, matchy.

    Voter registration is so very important.  And the state courts are obviously essential to fighting the monsters.

    Forward!

    Best wishes,
    Scott.

  17. 17.

    WaterGirl

    @BellyCat: In this case, I believe that even one of these judges not being retained would shift the balance.

    A retention election isn’t one where a “better” democrat runs against an existing one.

    In my opinion, that’s just a risk not worth taking for a purity test or to get rid of a Democratic Justice that we might not care for or don’t agree with.

    And it’s PA, which is not reliably Democratic.  Now is not the time to risk a Republican SC in PA

    Just my considered opinion.  Please feel free to explain why you think I’m wrong.

  21. 21.

    BellyCat

    @WaterGirl: You’re not “wrong”, per se. I held my nose last time this issue arose and voted for retention.

    But…. There are some deep structural problems with the PA judicial system. I may share some insights on this with you (via email) if/when I get a chance. As a teaser, the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts (AOPC) has a list of 16 duties which are in the public interests. Here is #15: “To provide to personnel of the system legal services and, when appropriate, representation by legal counsel.”

    An attorney I know, who clerked for SCOPA for five years, said that this is a clear conflict of interest, at odds with public interests. Guess which of the 15 duties the AOPC takes most serious?

    More  later (maybe). I will possibly (likely) have a matter before SCOPA in the next few months, so I need to reflect on public disclosure right now. But very troubling judicial issues are involved and, oddly, they involve due process issues, writ large.

    ETA: The ONLY way to report an operational concern about a Court of Common Pleas (which is overseen by the AOPC) is to report the concern to the AOPC. You can probably do the math about “who guards the guards”…

  23. 23.

    WaterGirl

    @BellyCat:

    “To provide to personnel of the system legal services and, when appropriate, representation by legal counsel.”

    What does that even mean?

  29. 29.

    BellyCat

    @WaterGirl: Truth. SCOPA will likely soon have the opportunity to revisit this particular requirement, as will the judicial oversight committee in the PA legislature.

  34. 34.

    WaterGirl

    Our Angel #2, PatrickG, has added his match to the thermometer!  Thanks so much to PatrickG.

    $775 of our $1k anonymous Angel match #3 is still available.

Comments are closed.