• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

There are a lot more evil idiots than evil geniuses.

Sadly, media malpractice has become standard practice.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Their shamelessness is their super power.

So fucking stupid, and still doing a tremendous amount of damage.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Trump’s cabinet: like a magic 8 ball that only gives wrong answers.

Trump should be leading, not lying.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

Our messy unity will be our strength.

Stand up, dammit!

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

To the privileged, equality seems like oppression.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

the 10% who apparently lack object permanence

Tide comes in. Tide goes out. You can’t explain that.

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Dear elected officials: Trump is temporary, dishonor is forever.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!

Anne Laurie

You are here: Home / Archives for Anne Laurie

Anne Laurie has been a Balloon Juice writer since 2009.

Open Thread: “The Luke Scott Problem”

by Anne Laurie|  April 26, 201110:00 pm| 143 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Open Threads, Sports, Assholes

Professional sports are not my personal choice for entertainment, but I do enjoy the side benefit that it provides steady employment for some consistently entertaining writers. As, for example, Tom Scocca at Slate, in a post subtitled “I Know Why I Cheer for a Birther Moron, But Why Does ESPN Cheer for Him?”

Last week, Amy K. Nelson of ESPN wrote a long profile of Scott, who she identified as “one of baseball’s most complex characters” and someone who “will require a deeper line of thinking.”
__
Nope. Luke Scott, as he showed Nelson while roaming around Florida with her during spring training, is a standard-issue ignoramus, whose otherwise unfurnished mental spaces have been filled in with white-exceptionalist superpatriotism, gun-fetish paranoia, and assorted other fantasies and delusions scavenged from the county dump of red-blooded One-Hundred-Percent America….
_
But Amy K. Nelson is interested in his character. Here are the complex-ish parts: he’s a white ballplayer who is friendly with his Latino teammates and speaks fluent Spanish—having grown up poor in Florida. He does charitable works “with no publicity,” except for the publicity that comes from letting that fact be known to a reporter profiling him for the biggest sports-media outlet in the country. And…well, no, that’s it. He has nice manners.
__
Did I mention he hits baseballs hard? Being a sports fan, and a baseball fan in particular, means you are emotionally invested in a certain aspect of the lives and successes of people who have been rewarded, with tremendous amounts of money and fame, for doing (and being) what they did (and were) as 14-year-olds…
__
Screwing around with guns in front of a national reporter, while a case of manslaughter or worse was hanging over his ballclub, was a piss-poor cognitive decision. Some leagues would find a way to discipline a player reckless and self-centered enough to do that. But Scott seems hell-bent on becoming the Carrie Prejean of baseball, and it won’t do the Orioles any good to help him along the way.

And the inestimable Charles P. Pierce, discussing the same article about the same ballplayer:

Leaving aside the learned disquisitions on constitutional law — “Godly principles”? James Madison just chugged a whole bottle of Madeira in the Beyond. — This Blog was most struck by this passage:
__
“Most of Scott’s childhood friends are in prison, he says, or in the military; he would have been a Marine sniper had baseball not panned out. But it did.”
__
Wait. Hold on a minute.
__
Luke Scott “would’ve been” a Marine sniper, but he got too good at baseball to try out for the job? This Blog calls horse-hockey here. Assuming Scott is marksman enough to make the grade, if he wanted to be a Marine sniper, he would be a Marine sniper. He decided he preferred to play baseball for a living. Period. This Blog is not aware of any rule in the Corps reading to the effect that: “An applicant shall be denied entry to the Corps, and shall not be considered for specialized duty, if said applicant can hit .267 lifetime.”
__
The barstools, alas, are full of guys who would’ve joined the military if it wasn’t for etc. etc. etc. And, if you’re going to run a quote like this, you should really get a statement from the Tillman family.

Click through to the links for much more excellence, including talk about actual baseball.

Open Thread: “The Luke Scott Problem”Post + Comments (143)

Putting the “Thug” in ReThuglican

by Anne Laurie|  April 26, 201111:38 am| 43 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Election 2012, Excellent Links, Republican Venality

Two related, must-read pieces from Mother Jones. Andy Kroll has an excellent, link-heavy post on The Right-Wing Network Behind the War on Unions:

… Behind the onslaught is a well-funded network of conservative think tanks that you’ve probably never heard of. Conceived by the same conservative ideologues who helped found the Heritage Foundation, the State Policy Network (SPN) is a little-known umbrella group with deep ties to the national conservative movement. Its mission is simple: to back a constellation of state-level think tanks loosely modeled after Heritage that promote free-market principles and rail against unions, regulation, and tax increases. By blasting out policy recommendations and shaping lawmakers’ positions through briefings and private meetings, these think tanks cultivate cozy relationships with GOP politicians. And there’s a long tradition of revolving door relationships between SPN staffers and state governments. While they bill themselves as independent think tanks, SPN’s members frequently gather to swap ideas. “We’re all comrades in arms,” the network’s board chairman told the National Review in 2007….
__
Founded in 1992 by businessman and Reagan administration insider Thomas Roe—who also served on the Heritage Foundation’s board of trustees for two decades—the group has grown to include 59 “freedom centers,” or affiliated think tanks, in all 50 states. SPN’s board includes officials from Heritage and right-wing charities such as the Adolph Coors and Jacqueline Hume foundations. Likewise, its deep-pocketed donors include all the usual heavy-hitting conservative benefactors: the Ruth and Lovett Peters Foundation, which funds the Cato Institute and Heritage; the Castle Rock Foundation, a charity started with money from the conservative Coors Foundation; and the Bradley Foundation, a $540 million charity devoted to funding conservative causes. SPN uses their contributions to dole out annual grants to member groups, ranging from a few thousand dollars to $260,000, according to 2009 records.
__
According to SPN’s website, Roe launched the conservative network “at the urging” of President Reagan himself as a way to shape state-level policy just as Heritage has influenced federal policy. Surveying the political landscape today, Roe’s and Reagan’s idea couldn’t have been more prescient. More than a dozen states are currently considering legislation weakening the clout of organized labor. In many of those states, SPN think tanks have been pushing for similar prescriptions for years via “research” papers, policy recommendations, and talking points that are widely distributed to lawmakers.
__

show full post on front page

Putting the “Thug” in ReThuglicanPost + Comments (43)

… SPN think tanks do more than merely pepper politicians with briefings and a barrage of policy recommendations; they also serve as a farm team for the GOP. Reps. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Mike Pence (R-Ind.) and former Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) all ran SPN think tanks before entering Congress…

Yeah, that trio may not qualify for Mensa membership (even if they combined scores), but there’s an old proverb about relative political power: We all know their names but they don’t know ours.

And for more detail of the sick, twisted sociopathy behind SPN’s founders, Rick Perlstein goes “Inside the GOP’s Fact-Free Nation” to dissect “how political lying became normal”:”

…Ronald Reagan explicitly built his appeal around the notion that it was time to stop challenging the powerful. A new sort of lie took over: that the villains were not those deceiving the nation, but those exposing the deceit—those, as Reagan put it in his 1980 acceptance speech, who “say that the United States has had its day in the sun, that our nation has passed its zenith.” They were just so, so negative. According to the argument Reagan consistently made, Watergate revealed nothing essential about American politicians and institutions—the conspirators “were not criminals at heart.” In 1975, upon the humiliating fall of Saigon, he paraphrased Pope Pius XII to make the point that Vietnam had in fact been a noble cause: “America has a genius for great and unselfish deeds. Into the hands of America, God has placed the destiny of an afflicted mankind.”
__
The Gipper’s inauguration ushered in the “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” era of political lying. But it took a deeper trend to accelerate the cultural shift away from truth-telling-as-patriotism to a full-scale epistemological implosion.
__
Reagan rode into office accompanied by a generation of conservative professional janissaries convinced they were defending civilization against the forces of barbarism. And like many revolutionaries, they possessed an instrumental relationship to the truth: Lies could be necessary and proper, so long as they served the right side of history…
__
“We ought to see clearly that the end does justify the means,” wrote evangelist C. Peter Wagner in 1981. “If the method I am using accomplishes the goal I am aiming at, it is for that reason a good method.”

Historians will no doubt mention there’s a pivot where all great empires start privileging “civility” over “honesty“… and that’s the chapter future scholars title with some variation on “decline and fall”. Never expected to watch it unravel in real time, via HD broadband, did you?

Late Night Open Thread: Heightening the Contradictions

by Anne Laurie|  April 26, 20113:46 am| 41 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012, Excellent Links, Open Threads

Dave Weigel, at Slate, reports that Ron Paul will announce his presidential exploratory committee tomorrow in Des Moines.

John H. Richardson, at Esquire‘s Political Blog, goes there, full eeyore:

There is something that currently plagues our nation: a kind of irritable grasping after conclusions, the kind that made me stopped blogging regularly for a while, as I fought in myself that lonely battle of the last five or six people in America who still think that life is way too complicated for any summing up that doesn’t involve math. But if someone held a gun to my head and asked me to say what I think about Ron Paul, after interviewing him and following him around for my new profile in the May issue, this is what I would say:
__
Ron Paul is, or seems to be, a very sweet and shockingly naïve man who wants very much to do right by America. But his uncompromising vision of freedom would destroy America, really, by turbo-charging the powerful and the rich, who have shown throughout history that they have (with a few exceptions) zero social conscience and very little concern for the country. Already they’ve grasped most of the wealth and property in the country. Those in the top percentile are perfectly happy to throw Americans out of work and create jobs in China or Mexico if it means more profits, which they then bank overseas to avoid paying the taxes that create the relatively uncorrupted government under which they thrive. Given the nearly unlimited freedom from regulations and taxes that Republicans like Paul dream of, they’d be completely unrestrained. Eventually the desperate peasantry would realize, as they just realized throughout the Middle East, that the system was completely gamed against them. The result would be bloody revolution…

Seriously: Go read the whole post, at least, and if you’ve got the time the earlier posts & the interview excerpt are also worth perusing. Further recommendation, Richardson is the man responsible for last year’s excoriating Newt Gingrich profile. Paul’s not so entertaining (or terrifying) a subject as Gingrich, but that’s the difference between monomania and sociopathy for you.

Late Night Open Thread: Heightening the ContradictionsPost + Comments (41)

“Your Papers, Citizen?”

by Anne Laurie|  April 25, 20119:24 pm| 128 Comments

This post is in: Decline and Fall, Security Theatre

Via Digby:

Remember when Alaskan extremist candidate Joe Miller cited East Germany’s border fence as a fine example and we all laughed and laughed because their fence was built to keep their own people in rather than keeping foreign people out?
__
Well, the laugh’s on us. We may not be literally building such a fence, but we are creating a virtual one:

If you don’t want it to get even harder for a U.S. citizen to get a passport — now required for travel even to Canada or Mexico — you only have until Monday to let the State Department know.
__
The U.S. Department of State is proposing a new Biographical Questionnaire for some passport applicants: The proposed new Form DS-5513 asks for all addresses since birth; lifetime employment history including employers’ and supervisors names, addresses, and telephone numbers; personal details of all siblings; mother’s address one year prior to your birth; any “religious ceremony” around the time of birth; and a variety of other information. According to the proposed form, “failure to provide the information requested may result in … the denial of your U.S. passport application.”
__
The State Department estimated that the average respondent would be able to compile all this information in just 45 minutes, which is obviously absurd given the amount of research that is likely to be required to even attempt to complete the form.
__
It seems likely that only some, not all, applicants will be required to fill out the new questionnaire, but no criteria have been made public for determining who will be subjected to these additional new written interrogatories. So if the passport examiner wants to deny your application, all they will have to do is give you the impossible new form to complete….

What in the hell is this about?
__
If the worry is that non-US citizens are getting passports then they need to change the verification process in a way that’s possible to meet. If it’s about something else, then they need to explain what it is..
__
This is Big Brother stuff — they are setting up a series of roadblocks to use “just in case” they want to deny someone a passport. The question is, who and why? Basically, this will potentially deny US citizens the ability to travel outside the country. It may not be a wall, but it functions pretty effectively as one if they want it to.

I’m guessing this may be related to the Governmental-bureaucratic mindset that assumed, per the Gitmo papers, that travelling to Afghanistan after 9/11 was sufficient indication of terrorist sympathies to permit ‘extrajudicial incarceration.’

All this does is give low-level drones new and inventive reasons to fvck up ordinary citizens’ daily lives. I, for example, have not a clue what my parents’ address was a year before I was born — somewhere in Manhattan, and at two different addresses, since they weren’t married at that time. And I can’t just call and ask them (assuming they’d remember, after 56 years) because they’re both dead. It would take me more than 45 minutes to google the city census, or more likely end up paying someone else to do it for me, and I’d still have more than half a century of personal data to compile.

Per the Consumer Traveler website:

There’s more information in the Federal Register notice (also available here as a PDF) and from the Identity Project.
__
You can submit comments to the State Dept. online at Regulations.gov until midnight Eastern time on Monday, April 25, 2011. Go here, then click the “Submit a Comment” button at the upper right of the page. If that link doesn’t work for you, it’s probably a problem with the javascript used on the Regulations.gov website. There are alternate instructions for submitting comments by email here.

Wanted to get this up before the deadline. Mandatory disclaimer, the innocent have nothing to hide…

“Your Papers, Citizen?”Post + Comments (128)

Monday Evening Open Thread

by Anne Laurie|  April 25, 20116:09 pm| 53 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads, Assholes, Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

Dana Milbank reports that Andrew Breitbart is an angry, angry man… with a book to sell. So I hoped for some much-needed slapstick comedy when Ken Layne at Wonkette posted on Saturday night:

KOCH INDUSTRIES
Breitbart-Palin Mob’s Next Target: Andrew Sullivan

America’s surly unemployed white mouse-clickers need a little direction here. What website needs to be boycotted next? It appears it is Andrew Sullivan’s “Daily Dish,” because he has committed the Crime of repeatedly writing in a Disrespectful Way about Saint Sarah Palin and her baby. Do these people realize Andrew’s site isn’t just a couple of bloggers, but is actually part of the Daily Beast and Newsweek? Do they have enough twitterers and mouse-clickers on the ‘puters to click every ad on a hundred years of Newsweek archives and send illiterate twats to every banner advertiser? Is Sarah Palin’s army of deluded fools ready to go to bat?…

Raising the question: Would “rooting for injuries” be the wrong response?

So… anybody got more dignified plans for their evening?

Monday Evening Open ThreadPost + Comments (53)

Some Pirates Will Rob You with An AK47…

by Anne Laurie|  April 25, 20119:15 am| 18 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Excellent Links, Foreign Affairs

… and some with a “flag of convenience” that allows shipowners to avoid millions in taxes, not to mention environmental, health & safety regulations. Rose George in the NYTimes discusses “Flying the Flag, Fleeing the State“:

Four American yachters killed; a Danish family of five and two crew members kidnapped: these events in the space of a week early this year may finally fuel a consensus that something needs to be done about piracy in the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden. And something should be done: in addition to the yachters, nearly 700 sailors, mostly Filipino, Bangladeshi and Russian, are being held hostage. Often forced to operate their captured ships at gunpoint, with little food or water, some of them have been prisoners for months.
__
But maritime lawlessness isn’t confined to pirates. Thanks to a system of ship registration called “flags of convenience,” it is all too easy for unscrupulous ship owners to get away with criminal behavior. They have evaded prosecution for environmental damage like oil spills, as well as poor labor conditions, forcing crews to work like slaves without adequate pay or rest. But unlike piracy, which seems intractable, the appalling conditions on some merchant ships could be stopped.
__
Ships used to fly the flags of their nation. They were floating pieces of their home country on ungovernable seas, with all the advantages and disadvantages of government oversight: if things went wrong, seafarers were protected by their governments. If they did wrong, they could be punished.
__
But in the early 20th century, this began to change. Panama, seeking to attract American ships avoiding Prohibition laws, allowed non-Panamanians to fly its flag, for a fee. Liberia and other countries followed suit. Today these “open registries” are used by over 60 percent of shippers, up from 4 percent in the 1950s.
__
Under the flags of convenience system, registries have been divorced from government oversight. North Korea has a thriving registry, as does landlocked Mongolia. Liberia’s registry, the second-largest in the world, flourished even during a dozen years of civil war. Some registries allow ship owners to change the flags they’re registered under within 48 hours; some require little more than a signature or an online form from an owner. Many don’t require owners to disclose their identities at all…
__
Many state registries lack the capacity or will to monitor the safety and working conditions on ships, or to investigate accidents. Instead, ship safety certificates are given out by private classification societies. Owners are allowed to choose which society they want — and the worst predictably choose the least demanding.

I originally typed that title as “fleecing the state”, but of course that’s not allowable under the Grey Lady’s style guide. Click through and read the whole article, you won’t regret it. And if you’ve got a few extra minutes, George’s “All at Sea: Five Weeks on A Container Ship” dispatches for Slate at the end of last year will tickle anyone who ever read the ripping maritime yarns of Kipling or Jack London, or Mark Twain’s Life on the Mississippi.

.

Some Pirates Will Rob You with An AK47…Post + Comments (18)

GITMO: Just As Bad As We Suspected

by Anne Laurie|  April 25, 20112:51 am| 37 Comments

This post is in: Torture, War on Terror aka GSAVE®, We Are All Mayans Now

The Guardian and the NYTimes have coordinated another release of redacted ‘security papers’ from Wikileaks, this time concerning Guantanamo. From a quick scan, there are no “shocking new revelations”, just confirmation that the DFHs were right… again. Here is the Guardian:

Guantánamo files lift lid on world’s most controversial prison
• Innocent people interrogated for years on slimmest pretexts
• Children, elderly and mentally ill among those wrongfully held
• 172 prisoners remain, some with no prospect of trial or release…
__
The 759 Guantánamo files, classified “secret”, cover almost every inmate since the camp was opened in 2002. More than two years after President Obama ordered the closure of the prison, 172 are still held there.
__
The files depict a system often focused less on containing dangerous terrorists or enemy fighters, than on extracting intelligence. Among inmates who proved harmless were an 89-year-old Afghan villager, suffering from senile dementia, and a 14-year-old boy who had been an innocent kidnap victim. The old man was transported to Cuba to interrogate him about “suspicious phone numbers” found in his compound. The 14-year-old was shipped out merely because of “his possible knowledge of Taliban…local leaders”.
__
US authorities listed the main Pakistani intelligence service, the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI), as a terrorist organisation alongside groups such as al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah and Iranian intelligence. Interrogators were told to regard links to any of these as an indication of terrorist or insurgent activity…
__
US authorities relied heavily on information obtained from a small number of detainees under torture. They continued to maintain this testimony was reliable even after admitting that the prisoners who provided it had been mistreated….
__
The leaked files include guidance for US interrogators on how to decide whether to hold or release detainees, and how to spot al-Qaida cover stories. One warns interrogators: “Travel to Afghanistan for any reason after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 is likely a total fabrication with the true intentions being to support Usama Bin Laden through direct hostilities against the US forces.”
__

show full post on front page

GITMO: Just As Bad As We SuspectedPost + Comments (37)

The inclusion of association with the ISI as a “threat indicator” in this document is likely to pour fuel on the flames of Washington’s already strained relationship with its key regional ally. A number of the detainee files also contain references, apparently based on intelligence reporting, to the ISI supporting, co-ordinating and protecting insurgents fighting coalition forces in Afghanistan, or even assisting al-Qaida.
__
Obama’s inability to shut Guantánamo has been one of the White House’s most internationally embarrassing policy failures. The files offer an insight into why the administration has been unable to transfer many of the 172 existing prisoners from the island prison where they remain outside the protection of the US courts or the prisoner-of-war provisions of the Geneva conventions.
__
The range of those still held captive includes detainees who have been admittedly tortured so badly they can never be successfully tried, informers who must be protected from reprisals, and a group of Chinese Muslims from the Uighur minority who have nowhere to go.

The NYTimes adds, in its best Grey Lady manner:

What began as a jury-rigged experiment after the 2001 terrorist attacks now seems like an enduring American institution, and the leaked files show why, by laying bare the patchwork and contradictory evidence that in many cases would never have stood up in criminal court or a military tribunal. […] __
Obama administration officials condemned the publication of the classified documents, which were obtained by the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks last year but provided to The Times by another source. The officials pointed out that an administration task force set up in January 2009 reviewed the information in the prisoner assessments, and in some cases came to different conclusions. Thus, they said, the documents published by The Times may not represent the government’s current view of detainees at Guantánamo.

Mandatory disclaimer: Bush started it, the Bush Administration and its hand-picked lackeys were responsible for the worst abuses, and Bush holdouts in both the military and the DoJ are undoubtably making the situation worse this very day. Also, the NIMBY whiners in Congress should be ashamed of themselves. But Bush is not the leader standing in today’s harsh spotlight, and the current Administration’s stated policy of “looking forward, not back” would seem to make it unlikely that Dubya will be called upon.

“No worse than our critics expected” is hardly an exculpation for the history books.

Safe prediction: It’s not going to be a happy Monday anywhere in the political spheres.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 2504
  • Page 2505
  • Page 2506
  • Page 2507
  • Page 2508
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 2651
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Elma - Greenland Part 1 1
Photo by Elma(1/13/26)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Order Your Pet Calendars!

Order Calendar A

Order Calendar B

 

Recent Comments

  • trnc on Wednesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 14, 2026 @ 8:59am)
  • Baud on Wednesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 14, 2026 @ 8:59am)
  • Paul in KY on Monday Night Open Thread (Jan 14, 2026 @ 8:59am)
  • Matt McIrvin on Wednesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 14, 2026 @ 8:58am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Plagues & Pandemics Update – January 14, 2026 (Jan 14, 2026 @ 8:58am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Mary Peltola Alaksa Senate

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc