• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Let there be snark.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

I know this must be bad for Joe Biden, I just don’t know how.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

So many bastards, so little time.

🎶 Those boots were made for mockin’ 🎵

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

The arc of history bends toward the same old fuckery.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

The rest of the comments were smacking Boebert like she was a piñata.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

fuckem (in honor of the late great efgoldman)

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

In my day, never was longer.

Republicans can’t even be trusted with their own money.

This country desperately needs a functioning Fourth Estate.

Wake up. Grow up. Get in the fight.

Mobile Menu

  • Worker Power Leadership School
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Healthcare / World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It)

World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It)

Co-ops are back

by Kay|  July 23, 201110:21 am| 35 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Free Markets Solve Everything, Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You, World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It), Blatant Liars and the Lies They Tell, Daydream Believers

Remember co-ops, from the horrible, lie-filled health care debate? Co-ops didn’t get nearly the press that the imaginary death panels did, but the idea had supporters:

New consumer-controlled health insurance plans could get seed money from the government to increase competition – and maybe cut prices — under new rules announced Monday by the Department of Health and Human Services.The rules would steer a total of $3.8 billion in low-interest loans to groups such as The Evergreen Project in Baltimore, seeking to launch the so-called Consumer Oriented and Operated Plans. The health department hopes at least one “co-op” will launch in each state and anticipates funding a total of 57 around the country.

The strategy is that new health plans run by consumers – most board members would also have to be plan members — would find ways to improve care, rather than boost profits. The new plans, made possible by the seed money, would also compete with established insurers to drive prices down.The co-ops could “further two of the important goals of the Affordable Care Act, increasing competition and enhancing the voices of consumers in the health care market,” said Steve Larsen, the director the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, during a Monday call with reporters to announce the rules.

Here’s The Evergreen Project:

AN AUDACIOUS ATTEMPT TO CREATE SYSTEMIC CHANGE
We know the health care system is broken. It’s the only industry in the country where costs continue to rise, while quality continues to lag. As a country, we’ve taken major steps forward in the last year, but even with reform, too many Americans will remain uninsured or underinsured.

But, what if there was a solution? A solution that reduces costs, while improving outcomes. A solution where informed and involved patients work in tandem with their community physicians. A solution that is built on evidence-based medicine – or simply put, the use of medication and procedures that are proven to work. A solution that fundamentally changes the payment structure. A solution that creates genuine change. Well, that’s why we’re here.

What if? Just answer the question, please.

Okay, maybe not. Here’s a less breathless fact-based report on The Evergreen Project from a local paper that may help:

Pursuing a passion for “health care for all,” Peter Beilenson, M.D., the county’s health officer, is leading an effort called The Evergreen Project to create a new health care cooperative plan with a network of statewide clinics. The co-op would compete with qualified commercial health insurance plans on the new health insurance exchange Maryland is setting up under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Section 1322 of the health reform law enables the creation of Consumer Owned and Oriented Plans — co-ops. The ACA encourages that co-ops be statewide or in geographic regions throughout the country.
Under The Evergreen Project, the co-op would comprise a network of neighborhood clinics staffed by “teamlets,” including a primary care physician, a nurse, a health coach or social worker, and a front office liaison who is ideally from the community served. Beilenson said about a dozen states have similar efforts underway, but he believes Maryland is further in its development.
Co-ops would be self-governed by an elected board, but operate within the health reform exchange, under the same rules and regulations for minimum benefits, actuarially equivalent packages and reserve funds.
The Evergreen Project is currently studying the feasibility of launching a co-op plan in Maryland designed for households with family incomes of between133 percent and 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (a family of four earning $28,000 to $88,000 annually).Families in this range will be eligible for federal health insurance premium subsidies under health exchanges per the ACA, but many are still likely to find the cost too high, Beilenson said.

I already loathe the word “teamlet”, but other than that, do we hate this? I’d go out of my way to buy into the co-op plan, if one were offered in my state.

Co-ops are backPost + Comments (35)

How long is it until we can leave David Brooks out on a hillside to die?

by Sarah, Proud and Tall|  July 15, 201111:45 pm| 92 Comments

This post is in: World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It), I Read These Morons So You Don't Have To

As I have mentioned before, I try very hard not to read anything that David Brooks writes, just in case my brain becomes so revolted it tries to crawl out my ears.

His most recent excresence, however, is so appalling, such a pile of unthinking horror topped off with scads of twaddle masquerading as sympathy, that I can’t leave it alone.

The fiscal crisis is driven largely by health care costs. We have the illusion that in spending so much on health care we are radically improving the quality of our lives. We have the illusion that through advances in medical research we are in the process of eradicating deadly diseases. We have the barely suppressed hope that someday all this spending and innovation will produce something close to immortality.

…

Obviously, we are never going to cut off Alzheimer’s patients and leave them out on a hillside. We are never coercively going to give up on the old and ailing. But it is hard to see us reducing health care inflation seriously unless people and their families are willing to do what Clendinen is doing — confront death and their obligations to the living.

…

My only point today is that we think the budget mess is a squabble between partisans in Washington. But in large measure it’s about our inability to face death and our willingness as a nation to spend whatever it takes to push it just slightly over the horizon.

show full post on front page

After about ten minutes sitting in front of my computer spluttering and trying very hard (and failing) not to wish a long and lingering death on the sanctimonious pea-brain, I was lucky enough to find this wonderful response from James Ridgeway at Mother Jones which relieves me of the need to formulate rational responses to Brooks’ article:

Here’s how Brooks comes by his position: To begin with, he says: “The fiscal crisis is driven largely by health care costs.” Never mind two futile wars and 10 years of tax relief for millionaires.

Furthermore, he argues, the reason for these soaring costs is that very old and very sick people insist on clinging on to their miserable lives, when they ought to be civic-minded enough to kick off. It’s not the insurance companies, which reap huge profits by serving as useless, greed-driven middlemen. It’s not the drug companies, which are making out like bandits with virtually no government regulation. It’s not the whole corrupt, overpriced system of medicine for profit, which delivers the 37th best health care in the world, according to the WHO, at more than twice the cost of the best (France). No. It’s all about us greedy geezers. We’re the ones who are placing an untenable burden on the younger, heartier citizenry, with our selfish desire to live a little longer.

…

Brooks writes that “it is hard to see us reducing health care inflation seriously unless people and their families are willing to and their families are willing to do what Clendinen is doing—confront death and their obligations to the living.” And why is this so hard to see? Because conservatives like Brooks don’t believe in challenging the profit-driven health care system, and the people who pass these days for liberals lack the moxie to stand up to them.

Based on models from countries like France and Canada, we could bring about whopping savings in health care expenditures through a single payer system without rationing or compromising the quality of care. Short of this, we could opt for much more regulation and still save more money than we could by pulling the plug on every geezer in the land.

If I have any obligation to the living, it’s to leave them with a better system than we have now—one that values all human life above profits. But I know that’s not likely to happen before my death—which, if I listen to Brooks, could be right around the corner.

Instead I can simply content myself with:

(a) pointing you to this Dean Baker article, charmingly entitled “Is David Brooks Really Clueless About the Inefficiency of the U.S. Health Care System?

(b) noting that you, Mr Brooks, are an irredeemable arsehole.

ETA: In comments, the lovely Mr Levenson notes:

Thanks for this, SP&T. I was trying to summon up the strength for one more Brooks beat-down when I finally read today’s column a little while ago. And now I don’t have to.

You didn’t mention, though, what a vicious monstrous asshole he is for taking an incredibly carefully wrought, felt and thought essay by someone who knows much more of suffering than Brooks closed little mind will ever grasp—and twisting its point to exactly the opposite of what the author wrote. Brooks asks us to die for our country; Clendinen is constructing the timing and manner of his death for his own reason: to live the life he thinks worth and worthy of living, and not one moment that is not.

To get that wrong is to demonstrate one’s own unfitness—not for existing—but for any authority whatsoever.

He’s right. Clendinden’s article is truly lovely – gripping and sad and funny – and for David Brooks to use it for his own perverted ends is malicious and nasty, but sadly no more than we could expect.

[Image: Cardinal Mazarin Dying – Paul Delaroche (1797-1856)] [Cross posted at Sarah Proud and Tall.]

How long is it until we can leave David Brooks out on a hillside to die?Post + Comments (92)

Mitch Daniels Attempted Slow-Motion Murders Derailed (for now)

by Tom Levenson|  June 24, 201110:40 pm| 27 Comments

This post is in: Activist Judges!, World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It)

As y’all know, I’ve been resorting to any hyperbole (and sadly, not that hyperbolic at that) to highlight the fact that the phrase “the war on women” describes a conflict in which, you know, women actually die.

I’ve done so here in two posts about Indiana — led by former VSP presidential favorite Mitch Daniels — and the attempt there to defund Planned Parenthood for the sin of providing a legal medical procedure with dollars that have never passed through the Indiana revenue collection agency’s hands.

Now I’m happy to report that Indiana’s attempt to nullify federal law and procedure (and kill women) has been blocked, at least for now:

The state of Indiana is not allowed to cut off most of Planned Parenthood’s state and federal public funding solely because the organization also provides abortions, a federal judge said Friday in blocking part of the state’s tough new abortion law.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt granted Planned Parenthood of Indiana’s request for preliminary injunction on the state’s move to defund the organization. Her ruling sides with federal officials who said states cannot disqualify Medicaid providers merely because they also offer abortions or restrict Medicaid recipients’ freedom to choose their health care provider.

Of course, such setbacks do not deter those bent on depriving Indiana’s women of their access to health care (and, in some cases, life):

Indiana attorney general’s office spokesman Bryan Corbin said the state likely will appeal.

But for now at least, we are reminded (a) why the rule of law matters and (b) why federalism matters.  In this instance, it saves lives.

Image: Claude Monet, Camille Monet on her deathbed, 1879

Mitch Daniels Attempted Slow-Motion Murders Derailed (for now)Post + Comments (27)

Mitch Daniels Murder Watch — an update.

by Tom Levenson|  June 21, 20113:44 pm| 86 Comments

This post is in: Fuck The Poor, World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It), Fucked-up-edness, Sociopaths

Last month I wrote about the consequences of Governor Mitch Daniels decision to push for defunding Planned Parenthood in Indiana.

In it, I did a back-of-the-envelope calculation of cancer deaths that would result from the loss of just one of the services Planned Parenthood provides to Hoosier women, the administration of 500 Pap tests per week.  That led to a rough estimate that the withdrawal of that service (without replacement) would produce three to four unnecessary deaths per year:  women cut down just as surely — but with much more suffering — as if Mitch Daniels and his allies had shot them in the face.

Well, we’re getting there folks.  The Indiana Star reports that Planned Parenthood will cease to provide Medicaid services as of today; those among most in need will suffer:

“Our 9,300 Medicaid patients, including those who had appointments Tuesday, are going to see their care disrupted,” said Betty Cockrum, president of Planned Parenthood of Indiana.

The state of Indiana is also likely to see a rise in the number of cases of sexually transmitted diseases, as…

…the new law also strips Planned Parenthood of roughly $150,000 in funding for prevention of sexually transmitted diseases, money that paid for three intervention specialists — health workers who track down the partners of someone who tests positive for an STD and ensure they are tested and treated. Two of those specialists, who were based in Muncie, have been laid off, and a third, in Lafayette, is now employed in a different capacity.

That leaves Planned Parenthood with a single specialist, in Lafayette.

Wear a condom or demand one be worn if you’re planning to make a bit of whoopie on your next opportunity in Indiana, I guess…but hell, I don’t even have the heart for snark any more.

show full post on front page

Next up:  regular Wednesday closings for all PP clinics in the state, and, if a judge doesn’t block the implementation of the Indiana law, eight out of twenty eight of those facilities will shut their doors for good.

People are going to get sick, some of them will die as a result, and all because Mitch Daniels and your modern Republican party has decided that the abortion litmus test now demands that tax payer dollars can’t even be told that there are other dollars out there that might pay for something no federal ducat would dream of being exchanged for.

Those Republicans, predictably, conclude that the deaths — the murder — of Hoosiers severed from access to even basic health care is actually the fault of those who are being stopped from providing that care:

Sue Swayze, legislative director for Indiana Right to Life Anti-Women’s-Autonomy, said that with Monday’s reduction in services, Planned Parenthood has “made it clear what their priority is.”

“They wouldn’t stop providing abortions even in the interim to keep the women’s health services,” she said.

State Sen. Scott Schneider, R-Indianapolis, who authored the defunding language, echoed that criticism in legislative debate in April.

“If (Planned Parenthood) wants to receive taxpayer money,” he said, “they can simply stop practicing abortion.”

The shorter: cease providing a legal service with private money, or we’ll kill some women.

Anti-choicers don’t like being accused of valuing life only until it leaves the womb, but that’s too bad:  this is where you see exactly that (im)moral choice being made.

I don’t have words to express my contempt for these people.  Murders are being committed before our eyes, and that we will never know who the victims were only makes it worse.

Images:Paul Cezanne, The Murder, 1870

Paul Gauguin, The Spirit of the Dead Keeps Watch, 1892.

Mitch Daniels Murder Watch — an update.Post + Comments (86)

There’s a land that I heard of …

by Sarah, Proud and Tall|  May 17, 20111:57 am| 16 Comments

This post is in: Science & Technology, World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It), I Read These Morons So You Don't Have To

Maggie Gallagher (and yes, I feel a little dirty just typing her name) notes a CBS San Francisco report on a gentleman whose HIV has currently been reduced to undetectable levels as a result of treatment with HIV-resistant adult stem cells.

This story has been hanging around since December last year, but I am both sad to say that it is the first I have heard of it, and very happy if it gives HIV/AIDS researchers another avenue to follow in what I suspect is still going to be a long search for a cure.

Maggie deems it important enough to get a:

Wow, if true.

The thing that struck me most is a point that was made by one of the 4 commenters on Maggie’s post.

If the potential treatment had involved fetal stem cells, Maggie would undoubtedly already have posted a six page rant about how the queers are going to abort millions of babies in order to save themselves from the virally-inflicted vengeance of God, and we would all have been reading about this subject every week for the last six months.

Image: Sick Bacchus – Caravaggio (1571-1610)

[Edited slightly after posting.]

There’s a land that I heard of …Post + Comments (16)

And In Programming On Other Channels…

by Tom Levenson|  May 2, 20119:39 pm| 24 Comments

This post is in: Free Markets Solve Everything, Media, Show Us on the Doll Where the Invisible Hand Touched You, World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It)

Not to distract from the day of (ex) Osama (in which I’m wallowing as much as the next fella)…but just in case anyone wants just a touch of variety in their bloggy diet, here’s a peeve I picked up from this a.m.’s breakfast reading.

The piece is actually a good one by Jamer Surowiecki, describing how the long term budget issues facing the US are not those of deficit spending, per se, but of health care costs running consistently ahead of inflation GDP growth [per Acontra below].  It’s a fair account, accurate as far as I can tell on a quick read, and Surowiecki captures the nub of the matter precisely when he writes:

The ideal system, for most voters, would guarantee all seniors reasonable health care, stop the debt from getting out of control, and keep paying health-care providers as before. The problem is that you can only do two of those things at once.

Obama, as Surowiecki correctly notes, opts for door number three — choosing to change the payment structure for health care.

He gets it a bit wrong, IMHO, when he implies that Ryan similarly preserves his own two out of three options.  In fact, the Republican blueprint neither guarantees all seniors reasonable care, nor does its voucher plan control costs, as Surowiecki does say, given that the private insurers the GOP wants to feed (how’s that for a mandate?) have already been shown to be crappier at cost control than Medicare.  But if he is a little too kind to the feckless Ryan — a bit too fair and balanced, as it were — that’s not what gets my goat.

show full post on front page

__

Rather the fault lies in what is otherwise a pretty devastating passage describing of some of the flaws in Ryan’s prescription.  That section concludes with this line:

…Indeed, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that Ryan’s plan would actually increase the amount of money Americans spend on health care, since private insurers aren’t as good at curbing costs as Medicare. But taxpayers would pay less. (Italics added.)

Well…no.  As Surowiecki does say in the same damn sentence,  Americans will spend more on healthcare under the Ryan rationing scheme, even as less of that sum would be covered by federal disbursements of tax receipts.  Nonetheless, last time I looked, just about every American is a taxpayer and even those who pay no income tax fork over something to Uncle.

__

And with that slip, Surowiecki trips right into the wingnut meme-trap.  Under the Ryan plan taxpayers would pay more — much more — for health care, or else they would die of what a doctor I knew years ago termed “financial arrest.”

That some of the money would come out of that which they spend on taxes, and some directly out of their bank accounts, their home equity, their funeral plot funds doesn’t alter the basic fact:  the Republican party has endorsed a plan in which Americans will spend up for care, or get less (and die sooner) or both.

__

And in using the term “taxpayer” where he meant “the federal government” Surowiecki allows a false notion to stand.  The substitution gives the Republican plan a shiny veneer — that for all that the effects on health care will be pretty catastrophic  (as Surowiecki says), the scheme will still have the virtue of saving the taxpayer money.

Again: Surowiecki knows it won’t. He’s not a bad guy — quite the reverse, in fact, usually a very smart economics correspondent.  But this lapse of language, especially from one so generally on the ball, is revealing as hell.

__

We have to reclaim the frame of the argument, and remind everyone that when the Republicans transfer the power from public to private, from a social insurance approach to health care system to private profit maximizing insurance companies and fee-for-service business models, Americans, taxpayers all, lose much more than money.

Image:  Vincent van Gogh, Ward in the Hospital in Arles, 1889.

Paul Gauguin, The Spirit of the Dead Keeps Watch, 1892

And In Programming On Other Channels…Post + Comments (24)

“The First Thing A Principle Does Is Kill Somebody”

by Tom Levenson|  May 1, 20119:46 pm| 22 Comments

This post is in: Fuck The Poor, World's Best Healthcare (If You Can Afford It), Sociopaths

Thus sayeth Lord Peter Wimsey in Dorothy Sayers’ Gaudy Night — and while it offers unmerited dignity to Gov. Mitch Daniels to accuse him of possessing a principled moral judgment, it is still true that his decision to defund Planned Parenthood will kill some number of Indianans Hoosiers [per MBL below.  Seeing as I’m a Gene Hackman fan, an embarassing lapse].

Given that he has foreknowledge (or should, by any reasonable standard) of this outcome; given that he is doing this intentionally — after all, he has committed himself to the affirmative action of signing the bill in question; given that the consequences of this choice are readily recognizable to any mature observer, I know how I would characterize this act. YMMV. The blunt fact remains that mortal harm is coming to some women in his state as a direct result of his actions.

What’s this all about?  Well, Kay here already noted the key fact:  Planned Parenthood in Indiana is a major supplier of healthcare to women in poverty; withdrawal of that care we lead directly to premature deaths.  That fact is implicit in what Kay wrote.  All I want to do here is to make it explicit, to leave no ambiguity in the demonstration that the approach to health care policy taken by Daniels — and Republicans in general — leads directly to the deaths of Americans.

show full post on front page

__

From whence derive these –dare we call them murders?  Take a look at one of the most basic services Planned Parenthood provides its clients:  regular maternal and reproductive health care, including screening for one of the most preventable major diseases that afflict women, cervical cancer.  I’m going to do a bit of boring data dumping here, because I want to make the indictment of Daniels — and those who follow or admire him — as clear as possible

According to the CDC, about 12,000 women in the US were diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2007, the latest year for which I can find summary statistics. About 4,000 women died that year of the disease.  Many or most of those deaths were, or would soon be unnecessary, evidence of failures of public health, given that cervical cancer is preventable at very high rates.

For one route  vaccines exist that protects against infections by two of the most dangerous human papillomavirus strains implicated in the development of cervical cancers, and they are recommended by the CDC for girls and young women as early as possible (as young as 9) to protect against such viruses before risks of exposure mount.

Right wing opposition that to my jaundiced eye looks to oppose anything that might hint at independent sex lives for women has hindered the widespread application of one of the lowest cost, least invasive life saving medical interventions we now possess, one that could, as the raw numbers above suggest, save many thousands from the suffering involved in cancer treatment — and thousands again from dying unnecessarily from a wholly preventible disease.

The other path to prevention is, of course, the use of a screening test, the Pap smear, to catch the lesions that can proceed to full blown disease before they become malignant.

The US Preventative Services Task  Force (among many others) recommends that women begin a regular screening regimen within three years of the onset of sexual activity or their twenty first birthday, whichever comes first, to be repeated every three years until the age of 65, barring the presence of certain risk factors for the disease.

Such screening saves lives.  Lots of them.  Many sources report that a regular screening program with appropriate follow up reduces cancer incidence rates by up to 80%.  In the US that has corresponded to a drop in new cases from 14.2 per 100,000 in 1973 to rates about half that now, leading to 3 deaths per 100,000.  In Indiana itself, 2.4 white women per 100,000 were diagnosed with the disease in 20007; the number for African American women was 5.7 per 100,000.  That disparity may be due more to poor health services infrastructure and follow up for minority communities than to lack of access to screening itself; just about every source reminds the reader that the screening on its own can do nothing, unless action on the information thus gathered can occur.

All of this is background to this one datum: Planned Parenthood in Indiana delivers 500 Pap tests per week, and provides crucial health care support and services that allows the women it serves to do something about problems when detected.

Y’all know where this is going.  Pull 25,000 tests per year out of state health care system; do so for a population that is almost certain to include the most vulnerable and the least secure in their access to ongoing care, and you have a hot spot of cervical cancer cases waiting to happen.  If rates among that group revert to those comparable to countries with poor screening regimes – Romania in the late ‘90s, for example, with its Europe-high rate of 13.7 deaths per 100,000 – the back of my envelope tells three or four more women every year will die in Indiana unnecessarily – all for lack of access to the Planned Parenthood services that could have saved them.

I’ve been deliberately dull above, after my high-rev open.  The point I’m trying to make with this list of data and other people’s work is that there is not a political bone (or fibril) in the human papilloma virus.  HPV don’t care if you vote Republican or Democrat or The Rent Is Too Damn High.  It doesn’t judge you whether you have sex with one person….

 

…or if you like to do it like they do on the Discovery Channel.  It could give a viral sh*t what you think of the PDF of Obama’s birth certificate.  It shows up, gets nice and comfortable.  And then some women get sick, and some die.

And can I say again that those deaths are in principle wholly preventable?

Planned Parenthood does lots more than screen for gynecological cancers, of course.  This is just one example of the real commitment to saving lives, to life, that marks that organization.  But this story makes the point well enough:  when you cut poor and vulnerable people’s access to health care real harm results.

Which means that Mitch Daniels is presenting his bonafides to the Republican electorate with an action that will lead directly to the deaths of women whom he doesn’t know – whom he and we cannot know.  That anonymity, the statistical nature of the crime, means that Daniels will almost certainly never pay any price, let alone a criminal one, for his role in their deaths.  But they will be on his hands, and should be on his conscience.

And to go larger than just one politician whose ambition has swamped his capacity for moral reasoning, this is why we must work for more than just an individual electoral defeat for today’s Republican party.  Mitch Daniels may indeed by the best they’ve got over there.  That’s as damning an indictment as I can imagine.

Factio Grandaeva Delenda Est.

Images:  Egon Schiele, Death and the Woman, 1915.

Albrecht Dürer, The Flight to Egypt, 1494-1497.

“The First Thing A Principle Does Is Kill Somebody”Post + Comments (22)

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 65
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to page 67
  • Go to page 68
  • Go to page 69
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 74
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • p.a. on Where the Tree Frogs Sing (Open Thread) (Jun 26, 2024 @ 2:43pm)
  • scav on Supreme Court Decisions Again Today at 10 am ET (June 26 Edition) & Open Thread (Jun 26, 2024 @ 2:43pm)
  • ArchTeryx on Supreme Court Decisions Again Today at 10 am ET (June 26 Edition) & Open Thread (Jun 26, 2024 @ 2:42pm)
  • Bill Arnold on Where the Tree Frogs Sing (Open Thread) (Jun 26, 2024 @ 2:42pm)
  • JML on Wednesday Morning Open Thread: Good News (Jun 26, 2024 @ 2:39pm)

Betty Cracker’s Corner

Personal News: Valley of the Shadow
Balloon Juice Sponsored GoFundMe
Questions Answered, What’s Next
One last thing, and then we’ll speak of it no more
Leave a note for Betty (coming soon)

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada
Voting Access for All – Michigan
NC Black Alliance Campus Engagement

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Balloon Juice for Worker Power Leadership School

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc