Some news on the Google front: while the U.S. vs. Google Ads case has yet to be ruled on, there’s been some developments in the U.S. vs. Google Search case. Via the BBC:
It is one of a series of remedies proposed by the DOJ in a court filing late on Wednesday aimed at stopping the tech giant from maintaining its monopoly in online search.
Government lawyers also recommended that District Judge Amit Mehta force the firm to stop entering into contracts with companies – including Apple and Samsung – that make its search engine the default on many smartphones and browsers.
The proposed remedies stem from a landmark anti-competition ruling in August, in which Judge Mehta found Google illegally crushed its competition in online search.”
This was kind of the expected outcome of that ruling. Obviously, Google will appeal – that’s a given. But now that there’s to be a change in administration come January, it’s difficult not to wonder whether Judge Mehta’s proposed remedies will quietly dissipate into the ether under a, uh, more business-friendly DOJ.
The short answer is: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The longer answer is in that BBC article above. Quote below the jump [bolding is mine]:
An Anti-Trust Ruling for a World Without TrustPost + Comments (30)



