For some reason, House Republicans removed the ANWR drilling portion of the budget:
House leaders late Wednesday abandoned an attempt to push through a hotly contested plan to open an Alaskan wildlife refuge to oil drilling, fearing it would jeopardize approval of a sweeping budget bill Thursday.
They also dropped from the budget document plans to allow states to authorize oil and gas drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts — regions currently under a drilling moratorium.
The actions were a stunning setback for those who have tried for years to open a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR, to oil development, and a victory for environmentalists, who have lobbied hard against the drilling provisions. President Bush has made drilling in the Alaska refuge his top energy priorities.
The House Rules Committee formalized the change late Wednesday by issuing the terms of the debate when the House takes up the budget package on Thursday.
The decision to drop the ANWR drilling language came after GOP moderates said they would oppose the budget if it was kept in the bill. The offshore drilling provision was also viewed as too contentious and a threat to the bill, especially in the Senate.
It will probably be put back in during the conference committee (I think), but I do not understand the opposition to drilling in ANWR. I am under no illusion that drilling in ANWR will solve all of our problems, and I am in favor of measures designed to decrease consumption, increase conservation, and get more out of what we already use, but for the life of me, I don’t get the need to protect a few square miles of a vast tundra as if someone was talking about inviting oil firms to put 1930’s era drilling rigs in the middle of Yellowstone Park.