I have to confess I have not been paying attention to the Bolton nomination at all, and this story doesn’t clear things up at all. Exactly what is going on?
Is this just politics as usual, or is this a flawed candidate?
Check out this piece from the Times, where they openly admit gamesmanship as a motive for denying nominees:
In a sense, Mr. Johnson is paying for past sins. On issues ranging from global warming to mercury, the E.P.A. has been asked by Mr. Bush’s operatives to manipulate scientific evidence or, as in Mr. Carper’s case, to withhold such evidence for political ends. This has shaken the agency’s reputation for independent analyses and angered a lot of senators.
Mr. Carper believes that Mr. Johnson is qualified, as do we. But before the nomination proceeds, we’d like to hear Mr. Johnson promise to provide the long-delayed analysis. If he can give some indication that he will henceforth resist the White House’s political agenda, so much the better.
Is Bolton just more of the same?
