• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

You are either for trump or for democracy. Pick one.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Everything is totally normal and fine!!!

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

If you cannot answer whether trump lost the 2020 election, you are unfit for office.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Fundamental belief of white supremacy: white people are presumed innocent, minorities are presumed guilty.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Anne Laurie is a fucking hero in so many ways. ~ Betty Cracker

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

Is trump is trying to break black America over his knee? signs point to ‘yes’.

Tide comes in. Tide goes out. You can’t explain that.

We do not need to pander to people who do not like what we stand for.

“Until such time as the world ends, we will act as though it intends to spin on.”

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

This chaos was totally avoidable.

It is possible to do the right thing without the promise of a cookie.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / A Dog From the Uncanny Valley

A Dog From the Uncanny Valley

by @heymistermix.com|  May 24, 20108:06 am| 49 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

You dog lovers might enjoy a view of your pet, circa 2025. I find this video compelling, impressive and somewhat disturbing.

My storehouse of outrage is depleted early this morning, so here’s an open thread.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Ducking the Limelight
Next Post: Silver and gold »

Reader Interactions

49Comments

  1. 1.

    Teri

    May 24, 2010 at 8:21 am

    Wow, and I can hardly get my dog to go outside in the rain and forget about going on gravel! I kept thinking of the walking robots in star wars…..just think what that could do for paraplegics etc. Thanks for the vid, interesting.

  2. 2.

    akaoni

    May 24, 2010 at 8:45 am

    This video posted from the big dog robot from (I believe) the same team as the video above has also been floating around the intertubes for a while…the buzzing gives it an otherworldly, space insect vibe…

    May have been posted here previously, but I’m too lazy to look.

  3. 3.

    El Cid

    May 24, 2010 at 9:00 am

    This will help Dick Cheney in his future mobility needs, powered by his neutron star material heart.

  4. 4.

    bkny

    May 24, 2010 at 9:00 am

    i am totally creeped out by all of these robot videos. what do the powers that be have in mind….

  5. 5.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    May 24, 2010 at 9:18 am

    Why did they invent a giant flea robot?

  6. 6.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    May 24, 2010 at 9:18 am

    Note to self: If you ever work as a robot designer, spring for the extra material to add a head. Even if it’s just cosmetic, it can cut down the creepy factor far beyond the cost of the material and negligible extra work.

  7. 7.

    Theron

    May 24, 2010 at 9:20 am

    I like the handle on the back. Very practical.

  8. 8.

    Allienne Goddard

    May 24, 2010 at 9:20 am

    This will sound idiotic; I will never say this again. I actually felt a little bit like I felt when my daughter started exploring on her own. I found (I believe) the same robot a bit disturbing when I saw it being kicked and recovering equilibrium, but this is simply adorable.

  9. 9.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    May 24, 2010 at 9:25 am

    @Allienne Goddard:

    I actually felt a little bit like I felt when my daughter started exploring on her own.

    I knew there were robots who posted here.

    You can just sense that sort of thing.

    (PS: Just teasing. Nice comment actually)

  10. 10.

    Punchy

    May 24, 2010 at 9:28 am

    Why did they invent a giant flea robot?

    To play bass for the Red Hot Chili Peppers?

  11. 11.

    AnnaN

    May 24, 2010 at 9:31 am

    Dog? I totally see an amputee insect in that video.

  12. 12.

    Allienne Goddard

    May 24, 2010 at 9:31 am

    Mr. Pilgrim,

    Oh, no worries. I laughed when I read your comment. It is silly, but I felt a similar sense of excitement and pride, though much less extreme, of course.

    Also, do you have a link to explain how to quote or refer to your statement? I am a lurker by nature, and my google-fu is weak.

  13. 13.

    SP

    May 24, 2010 at 9:34 am

    The BigDog video @2 is much cooler- it features someone kicking the dog, the dog losing its shit on ice, and doing happy robot dog hop at the end.

  14. 14.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    May 24, 2010 at 9:38 am

    @Allienne Goddard: Oh it’s a “reply” link that should appear if you hover over the bottom right corner of my comment. Then you click it.

    I thought it was interesting, that the entire species might feel a sort of parental pride as this robotics thing really gets going. Or the same mix of pride, fear, and etc, knowing that from this day forward every spare cent you used to have will now go toward this object taking its first steps.

  15. 15.

    cleek

    May 24, 2010 at 9:43 am

    now they just need to drop in an MCP and the avatar that they pulled from the designer’s computer-whiz daughter’s VR holoband.

    the Cylon Dogs have a plan.
    it involves chewing-up all of humanity’s shoes.

  16. 16.

    Fern

    May 24, 2010 at 9:44 am

    Those robots are very intriguing – any ideas about how the technology might be applied?

  17. 17.

    Allienne Goddard

    May 24, 2010 at 9:46 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim:

    Thank you. Very kind of you to explain.

    I’m one of those despised “singulitarians” you might have heard about. We are awful people, but I expect at least some of my offspring to be cybernetic, so for me it is like seeing another mother with a bouncing baby.

  18. 18.

    CJ_n_PA

    May 24, 2010 at 9:48 am

    Its paid for by DARPA. It will only be a matter of time before the UAVs are directly packs of robot dogs on the ground to explore roads, caves and other inaccessible locations. I am sure the development is underway — project Dingo anyone.

  19. 19.

    Captain Goto

    May 24, 2010 at 9:49 am

    @cleek:Win.

  20. 20.

    Bruuuuce

    May 24, 2010 at 9:57 am

    I always thought my future dog would look something like Rags, from Woody Allen’s Sleeper. But he would NOT leave little batteries around the house!

  21. 21.

    Captain Goto

    May 24, 2010 at 10:09 am

    @Fern: Mine rescue?
    UXO Removal?
    Spy missions?

  22. 22.

    Randy P

    May 24, 2010 at 10:12 am

    I’m already creeped out by the replacement of animals by CGI in Hollywood. I love watching animals working in movies when it’s done well. (Great use of animals: Homeward Bound. Terrible use of animals: Homeward Bound 2.)

    The live-action remake of 101 Dalmations (1996) used some real dogs, including the adults Pongo and Perdita, but most of the puppies were animated.

  23. 23.

    DB

    May 24, 2010 at 10:14 am

    @akaoni:

    Obligatory Big Dog robot reply.

  24. 24.

    Randy P

    May 24, 2010 at 10:15 am

    @Fern:

    Those robots are very intriguing – any ideas about how the technology might be applied?

    “Not creepy enough to stuff your late departed pet? Let us make it into a robot for you! We give you your choice of personalities from friendly to psychotic-chihuahua!”

  25. 25.

    gnomedad

    May 24, 2010 at 10:16 am

    @Allienne Goddard:

    It is silly, but I felt a similar sense of excitement and pride, though much less extreme, of course.

    To say nothing of a sense of unease that you will soon no longer be in complete control.

  26. 26.

    gnomedad

    May 24, 2010 at 10:20 am

    Now this is really eerie. It reminds me of the Star Wars “walking gas pump” droid. Who decided to call it “PETMAN”? I hope our robot overlords treat us as well ad John treats Lily.

  27. 27.

    arguingwithsignposts

    May 24, 2010 at 10:22 am

    anyone notice it’s not a cat robot? Because that would require many more years of work. just sayin.

  28. 28.

    Nimm

    May 24, 2010 at 10:28 am

    I am a little uncomfortable about the fact that this robot was programmed to find human skin delicious.

  29. 29.

    SiubhanDuinne

    May 24, 2010 at 10:39 am

    I need to wait until lunchtime to watch the video and catch up on the comments. But I see this is an Open Thread . . . .

    So Howard Kurtz has a long article in this morning’s WaPo in which he gives Chuck Todd a great big ol’ sloppy tongue bath.

    And it’s so well-written, too! Here’s a sample:

    Tapping on a computer in a wrinkled blue shirt, Todd has just finished updating a blog post on Arlen Specter

    What that computer was doing in a wrinkled blue shirt, I’ll never know.

    /Groucho

  30. 30.

    Cyrus

    May 24, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Interesting video. Yeah, blah blah blah the robots are learning, but the thing that jumped out at me was the joints. It must be easy to make something strong that can rotate in two dimensions, but that robot dog’s hips were moving from side to side as well as front and back, and maybe the knees were too. And not just waving around: moving with enough force to carry itself. Think about the really tiny bits of metal or plastic that must be in there. I very rarely see that kind of articulation on toys or machines, and when I do it lasts about a month before breaking.

    Now consider that a human has at least 60 more joints than that robot, just counting our digits. Barring extreme misuse or misfortune, they can be expected to last for 60 years in perfect condition and another 20 years or so with functionality impaired but still present. They’re solid enough to take a fair amount of punishment on their own, and they are constantly being broken in ways too tiny for us to notice and being rebuilt and repaired.

    Humanoid robots are common in fiction because that makes for interesting conflicts over what makes people people and all that boring stuff, but it might just turn out that the objectively best kind of tool for long-term, multi-purpose work looks a lot like a living thing.

  31. 31.

    akaoni

    May 24, 2010 at 10:48 am

    @DB:

    Funny, but I like the robots better.

    @gnomedad:

    So awesome! It’s only a matter of time before we find R. Daneel Olivaw is among us…or maybe Roy Batty.

    I guess what I’m saying is I know that Boston Dynamics is part of the Military-Industrial complex, but the sci-fi geek in me still makes me <3 them.

  32. 32.

    chrome agnomen

    May 24, 2010 at 10:50 am

    @SiubhanDuinne:
    evidently while sitting on arlen spector.

  33. 33.

    bemused

    May 24, 2010 at 10:57 am

    Morning Joe show spent a lot of time on Sestak saying the WH offered him a job to not run against Spector. I thought Joe & Uncle Pat were going to pee their pants in excitement over their question if the WH did an illegal bribe.

  34. 34.

    Maude

    May 24, 2010 at 10:58 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim:
    You could have one of these robo dogs walk with you to work. How long does it take you to get to work these days?
    I don’t think a head would work. These are just creepy.
    Let us pray that they don’t ever use Tunch as a prototype for robo cat.
    If they did do robo cat, they could use them for community service instead of jail time. Get the offender to try and train little robo.

  35. 35.

    SiubhanDuinne

    May 24, 2010 at 10:59 am

    @chrome agnomen:

    LOL.

    I refuse to link to the article, but Howie also manages (under the guise of being highly complimentary) to make Savannah Guthrie come across as the single most vapid creature on this side of the Atlantic. I honestly don’t think she is, but you wouldn’t know it from the Kaplan piece.

  36. 36.

    arguingwithsignposts

    May 24, 2010 at 11:02 am

    @chrome agnomen: green balloons!

  37. 37.

    Paul in KY

    May 24, 2010 at 11:20 am

    It’s like a walking boom box. Pretty freaky.

  38. 38.

    Rick Taylor

    May 24, 2010 at 11:34 am

    Dkos diary on the incompetent job BP is doing setting up booms to protect the Gulf coastlines. Excellent pictures.
    __

    I lost my one copy of Photoshop, had to learn Gimp, and so the quality is sorta piece-of-shit-c*nt, but you get the idea. It’s fucking obvious. Boom is not meant to contain or catch oil. Boom is meant to divert oil. Boom must always be at an angle to the prevailing wind-wave action or surface current. Boom, at this angle, must always be layered in a fucking overlapped sort-of way with another string of boom. Boom must always divert oil to a catch basin or other container, from where it can be REMOVED FROM THE FUCKING AREA. Looks kinda involved, doesn’t it? It is. But if fucking proper fucking booming is done properly, you can remove most, by far most of the oil from a shoreline and you can do it day after day, week after week, month after month. You can prevent most, by far most of the shoreline from ever being touched by more than a few transient molecules of oil. Done fucking properly, a week after the oil stops coming ashore, no one, man nor beast, can ever tell there has been oil anywhere near that shoreline.

  39. 39.

    Martin

    May 24, 2010 at 11:37 am

    Spent the previous weekend at the JPL open house looking at the cool rovers. They’re doing some really extremely cool stuff out there with our tax dollars.

  40. 40.

    russell

    May 24, 2010 at 11:52 am

    Weaponized.

  41. 41.

    russell

    May 24, 2010 at 12:00 pm

    Boom is not meant to contain or catch oil. Boom is meant to divert oil.

    Hay.

  42. 42.

    cleek

    May 24, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    Boom is not meant to contain or catch oil. Boom is meant to divert oil.

    Boom may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds. When not in use, Boom should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration. Failure to do so relieves the makers of Boom, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company, Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability. Boom is not a toy. Do not taunt Boom.

  43. 43.

    WereBear

    May 24, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    Mr WereBear fell for the robot cat several years back. It was useful to play mind games with the real cats, and when it kept startling all the carbon based lifeforms in the middle of the night, I removed its batteries, put it in storage, and forgot about it.

    They have all the exasperating qualities, with none of the adorable cuddles.

  44. 44.

    chrome agnomen

    May 24, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    the holograms aren’t laughing.

  45. 45.

    Bad Horse's Filly

    May 24, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    @gnomedad: Why are all these robots headless? And if we keep pushing them around like that, eventually they’re gonna push back. Just saying.

  46. 46.

    russell

    May 24, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    Why are all these robots headless?

    It makes it harder for them eat us.

  47. 47.

    Anne

    May 24, 2010 at 1:20 pm

    “Safe human interaction with possibly dangerous robots?” He’ll be eating his words when the robots become more intelligent and start killing us off.

  48. 48.

    licensed to kill time

    May 24, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    That’s video of Kafka’s dog?

  49. 49.

    Mumphrey

    May 24, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    My dog won’t have a head in 2025? Have we asked the dogs what they think about this?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Paul in Jacksonville - Sunrise, Sunset Redux 2
Photo by Paul in Jacksonville (3/31/26)

We Met Our Goal for Alaska!

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address

Recent Comments

  • Gretchen on Underpants Noem (Open Thread) (Mar 3, 2026 @ 3:54pm)
  • Archon on Underpants Noem (Open Thread) (Mar 3, 2026 @ 3:54pm)
  • trollhattan on Underpants Noem (Open Thread) (Mar 3, 2026 @ 3:49pm)
  • JaySinWA on Underpants Noem (Open Thread) (Mar 3, 2026 @ 3:44pm)
  • Booger on Underpants Noem (Open Thread) (Mar 3, 2026 @ 3:44pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!