• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

They think we are photo bombing their nice little lives.

The real work of an opposition party is to oppose.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Lick the third rail, it tastes like chocolate!

I’m more christian than these people and i’m an atheist.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

The desire to stay informed is directly at odds with the need to not be constantly enraged.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

It may be funny to you motherfucker, but it’s not funny to me.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

The revolution will be supervised.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

Fundamental belief of white supremacy: white people are presumed innocent, minorities are presumed guilty.

Stamping your little feets and demanding that they see how important you are? Not working anymore.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Novak on Crossfire

Novak on Crossfire

by John Cole|  September 29, 20035:16 pm| 26 Comments

This post is in: Democratic Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

If what Novak has said on Crossfire is true, it appears there will be a whole lot of Democrats eating crow. Although, in all likelihood, they will not be as concerned with the ‘facts’ should they vindicate all members of the White House, to include Bush. Then, the story will change to cover-up, or the Bush cabal pressuring the Justice Department or muzzling the CIA.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Democrat Hyperventilating
Next Post: In Other News »

Reader Interactions

26Comments

  1. 1.

    Robin Roberts

    September 29, 2003 at 5:22 pm

    John, I missed Crossfire ( … err, that’s a lie. I swore long ago never to watch the silly show. ). What were Novak’s comments?

  2. 2.

    John Cole

    September 29, 2003 at 5:25 pm

    ‘Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this. In July I was interviewing a senior administration official on Ambassador Wilson’s report when he told me the trip was inspired by his wife, a CIA employee working on weapons of mass destruction. Another senior official told me the same thing. As a professional journalist with 46 years experience in Washington I do not reveal confidential sources. When I called the CIA in July to confirm Mrs. Wilson’s involvement in the mission for her husband — he is a former Clinton administration official — they asked me not to use her name, but never indicated it would endanger her or anybody else. According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs. Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operator, and not in charge of undercover operatives’…

  3. 3.

    Robin Roberts

    September 29, 2003 at 5:25 pm

    Ah, if HH’s notes in the comments of the thread below are what you are refering to … never mind.

  4. 4.

    Robin Roberts

    September 29, 2003 at 5:29 pm

    That would end this “scandal” in any reasonable minds.

  5. 5.

    Kimmitt

    September 29, 2003 at 5:40 pm

    Wait a moment, Novak was asked by the CIA not to use her name, then not only did so, but used the name “Valerie Plame” instead of “Valerie Wilson.” Now he’s using using “Mrs. Wilson?” Let’s keep in mind that part of the allegations is that Ms. Plame used her maiden name when engaged in some of her tradecraft . . .

    I buy that Mr. Novak was not called; it’s entirely possible that six other reporters were called, but Novak happened to stop by that day and became part of the process. I don’t buy much of the rest of his story. Mr. Novak has revealed sources under extraordinary circumstances before; the line is not as brightly drawn for him as he makes it out to be.

    Scandal’s not over. Someone used Novak to blow Plame’s cover, and Novak ignored the CIA’s request not to use her name to do it.

  6. 6.

    John Cole

    September 29, 2003 at 5:58 pm

    Kimmitt- It will NEVER be over with you. I am not saying this story is over, but the way the reportage has changed in just the past few days (senior administration officials downgraded to administration officials, Wilson admitting he lied about Rove, and this from Novak), it looks like things are falling apart pretty rapidly.

    I am just going to wait and see- but I don’t expect that any amount of exonneration of the White House and Bush will make it over for the left- they have wanted a Watergate from day one- and they will do their best to have one,m even if it did not happen.

  7. 7.

    Dean

    September 29, 2003 at 6:09 pm

    John,

    I think Kimmitt just enunciated the “Blutarsky strategy” of the Dems:

    “It’s not over until WE say it’s over! It wasn’t over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor! Are you with me?”

    ROFLMAO

  8. 8.

    Robin Roberts

    September 29, 2003 at 6:15 pm

    ROFL, Dean.

  9. 9.

    HH

    September 29, 2003 at 6:19 pm

    It has already been established on several blogs that the notion that uttering the name “Plame” would have blown her cover is BS, as Wilson’s own bio, which it is now confirmed he has given to at least three organizations, dating at least back to last year, mentioned the name Plame.

    Novak has said more than once that the CIA’s request was a weak one and he was never led to believe that she was undercover or that she might be endangered by the revelation.

  10. 10.

    HH

    September 29, 2003 at 6:21 pm

    BTW there is the alternatative, that the use of “Plame” would blow her cover, which makes Wilson himself guilty of blowing her cover first.

  11. 11.

    HH

    September 29, 2003 at 6:21 pm

    BTW there is the alternatative, that the use of “Plame” would blow her cover, which makes Wilson himself guilty of blowing her cover first. Plus Novak now says there was no cover to blow.

  12. 12.

    HH

    September 29, 2003 at 6:24 pm

    From the linked column:

    “Disclosing confidential sources is unthinkable for a reporter seeking to probe behind the scenes in official Washington, but the circumstances here are obviously extraordinary. The same traitor who delivered American spies into the Kremlin’s hands was expressing concern about the fate of intelligence assets in China.”

    Novak isn’t going around revealing sources willy-nilly… if the left is changing tactics to “get Novak,” that is really pathetic.

  13. 13.

    Pauly

    September 29, 2003 at 6:41 pm

    “it’s entirely possible that six other reporters were called”

    It’s entirely possible that Mr. Wilson is a woman and his wife is a rhino, too. We could speculate all day but it doesn’t get us anywhere except maybe to high blood pressure-land.

  14. 14.

    David Perron

    September 29, 2003 at 7:43 pm

    It’s also entirely possible that Wilson’s wife is identified by her maiden name on his webpage in an attempt to deceive people from…dang, I can’t come up with anything.

  15. 15.

    HH

    September 29, 2003 at 8:46 pm

    NBC News says Andrea Mitchell was called AFTER the Novak column… which makes one wonder if that’s the case with all “6 reporters.”

  16. 16.

    Justin Katz

    September 29, 2003 at 9:38 pm

    HH has beat me to two punches:

    1) Back when this began in July, a group of we bloggers thought it strange that Wilson would continually identify his wife as “the former Valerie Plame” in his bios if it was treason to do so.

    2) In the WaPo article, Wilson states that he received the reporters’ calls about a week after the Novak column (and the number keeps moving, from six to four to Andrea Mitchell), and just “deduced” the timing.

    Frankly, this is starting to look like yet another completely manufactured controversy. The beauty of it, from a Democrat point of view, is that all of the proceedings are classified. Coincidentally, it originated with our old friend David Corn, who managed to raise the specter of Bush administration criminality in print just two days after the Novak column appeared.

    But wouldn’t it be… interesting… if a central figure of the 16-words controversy (who hadn’t seen the documents that he was supposedly confirming as forgeries) proved to have been lying and spinning about the controversy of retaliation that outed the CIA wife who acted as the catalyst for his mission?

  17. 17.

    Robin Roberts

    September 30, 2003 at 12:07 am

    If the calls pushing the story came after Novak’s column, and Novak’s source isn’t in the White House, then its not a criminal case at all. At least not for White House aides.

    This is starting to sound more like Wilson and his wife are playing games. And if the chronology folds over this way, Wilson is the liar actually.

  18. 18.

    Kimmitt

    September 30, 2003 at 12:28 am

    And, just to make sure, the CIA’s request for a Justice Department probe combined with the WaPo’s story are both just window dressing, based exclusively on Wilson’s hearsay?

    Please. You can make all the excuses you want, but at some point, the simplest explanation is the best — that a senior Administration official burned Plame as revenge for Wilson’s whistleblowing. When this is all confirmed with phone logs, subpoenas, and Congressional testimony, will you believe it then? Or will they all be manufactured by the President’s enemies as well?

  19. 19.

    Andrew Lazarus

    September 30, 2003 at 1:28 am

    We’re gonna know real soon who the leakers were, because Novak was one of at least six journalists who were approached. And the CIA appears to have concluded they know who did it, if you parse their statement carefully.

    I’m willing to wait, guys. Very sensible. But I don’t expect to be eating any crow, either.

    Did you know Karl Rove was fired from Bush41’s election campaign for leaking to Robert Novak?

  20. 20.

    Mark L

    September 30, 2003 at 8:06 am

    Andrwe Lazarus said, “Did you know Karl Rove was fired from Bush41’s election campaign for leaking to Robert Novak?”

    Hmmmm. According to Texas Monthly (free registration required) Rove was in Austin, not Washington during Bush 41’s campaign. Also, if he did get fired (something I find hard to believe after reading this Texas Monthly piece), somehow, within a year, he was rehired to work on Bush 43’s race for the governor.

    From Texas Monthly:

    “He came to Texas in 1977 to do fundraising for Bush’s 1980 presidential bid. Soon he was the deputy chief of staff to Bill Clements, newly elected as the state’s first Republican governor since Reconstruction.

    After two years with Clements, Rove was contemplating going out on his own as a political consultant specializing in direct-mail marketing. Clements brought the issue to a head by asking for Rove’s commitment for the next five years, through what everyone expected would be a successful reelection campaign. Rove replied that he had decided to go out on his own, just as Clements had when he was about Rove’s age. Then Rove asked his boss to be his first client. The answer was yes. Rove handled the mailings for Clements’ 1982 race, but the Texas economy faltered and Clements was upset by Democrat Mark White. Rove was 32 years old, without a major client, and his nonpolitical customers, he says, began to get calls from Democratic operatives who suggested that they might want to find a mail expert who was not associated with an ousted Republican governor.

    In the crush of defeat, it was hard to predict that he was the right person at the right place at the right time

  21. 21.

    Andrew Lazarus

    September 30, 2003 at 2:53 pm

    Mark, my source on 1992 was Josh Marshall who cites an Esquire article on Rove.

  22. 22.

    Mark L

    September 30, 2003 at 4:18 pm

    Well, then I apologize. Texas Monthly *must* be wrong. I mean, Josh Marshall. And Esquire. Two utterly and always infallible sources.

    I mean what credibility does Texas Monthly have about someone being in Austin, TX? After all, that is where their *offices* are. They must have *imagined* the whole thing.

  23. 23.

    Dean

    September 30, 2003 at 4:46 pm

    Now, think about this a minute.

    If you were Karl Rove, and you leaked to Novak, a move which cost you your job, what are the chances that you’d leak to him again?

    If you were either of the Bushes, what are the chances, given the premium you place on “loyalty” that you’d bring on-board someone who had leaked?

    Finally, if you were Robert Novak, would you even HINT that it was Karl Rove who had leaked something like this, since EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE, that means that Rove’ll leak even BETTER info. Or, to put it differently, would you burn Deep Throat over the fact that Haldeman had gotten a traffic ticket??

    Something doesn’t pass the smell test, here….

  24. 24.

    Robin Roberts

    September 30, 2003 at 6:11 pm

    Exactly Dean, someone – I think CIA – is playing a deeper game.

  25. 25.

    Andrew Lazarus

    October 1, 2003 at 9:53 am

    Mark L, I don’t see how the Texas Monthly article shows Rove wasn’t fired from the Bush 41 campaign. Just because it doesn’t mention it?

    The Esquire article, as you can see, includes interviews with Rove and his staff. I’m sure they would have asked for a retroactive correction of any mistake this big.

  26. 26.

    David Perron

    October 1, 2003 at 10:14 am

    Andrew, do you realize there’s a fairly wide gap between “…Rove was fired…” and “Sources…say…Rove was fired…”? There’s at least three quite different interpretations I could place on the latter. And there’s one other thing that can happen: the sources can be wrong. Not saying they are, but citing an opinion piece that presents secondhand information from unnamed sources is pretty weak.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Christopher Mathews - Iceland: Season's Fleeting 3
Image by Christopher Mathews (6/13/25)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

We did it!

We raised the 25,000 for The Civics Center, and with the external matches, that gives them $60,000 for this Spring effort!

You guys rock!

Recent Comments

  • MagdaInBlack on Here I Am Again, With Another Positive Message (Jun 13, 2025 @ 10:22pm)
  • bbleh on Here I Am Again, With Another Positive Message (Jun 13, 2025 @ 10:13pm)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 1,205: Indirect Effects (Jun 13, 2025 @ 10:12pm)
  • RevRick on Here I Am Again, With Another Positive Message (Jun 13, 2025 @ 10:09pm)
  • Professor Bigfoot on Friday Night Open Thread (Jun 13, 2025 @ 10:08pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!