• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

T R E 4 5 O N

Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Republicans in disarray!

In my day, never was longer.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.

No one could have predicted…

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

I did not have telepathic declassification on my 2022 bingo card.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / War on Terror / War on Terror aka GSAVE® / Not Just Criminal, But Stupid

Not Just Criminal, But Stupid

by John Cole|  April 23, 200911:46 am| 32 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®, Republican Crime Syndicate - aka the Bush Admin.

FacebookTweetEmail

Interesting op-ed in the NY Times from a former FBI agent with intimate knowledge of the process and debunks the “torture works nonsense” that is well worth a read, but contained this nugget as well:

One of the worst consequences of the use of these harsh techniques was that it reintroduced the so-called Chinese wall between the C.I.A. and F.B.I., similar to the communications obstacles that prevented us from working together to stop the 9/11 attacks. Because the bureau would not employ these problematic techniques, our agents who knew the most about the terrorists could have no part in the investigation. An F.B.I. colleague of mine who knew more about Khalid Shaikh Mohammed than anyone in the government was not allowed to speak to him.

If I remember correctly, and I may not be, one of the things that used to just incense right-wingers was Jamie Gorelick and the ability of different agencies to communicate. It has been so long, I don’t even know if that was true and just more of the typical BS from these guys, but it would seem that they one-upped Gorelick.

I may be misremembering things, though, so if anyone can fill in the details, that would be great.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « There, but for the grace of God, torture I?
Next Post: They Still Think This Is About Politics »

Reader Interactions

32Comments

  1. 1.

    4tehlulz

    April 23, 2009 at 11:51 am

    For the righttards, the sanctity of the ability to torture overrides national security and public safety.

    Therefore, the communist Chinese wall is perfectly acceptable.

  2. 2.

    Zifnab

    April 23, 2009 at 11:53 am

    If I remember correctly, and I may not be, one of the things that used to just incense right-wingers was Jamie Gorelick and the ability of different agencies to communicate. It has been so long, I don’t even know if that was true and just more of the typical BS from these guys, but it would seem that they one-upped Gorelick.

    Depends who was saying it. Serious Republicans have existed in the past, and the whole CIA / FBI firewall was a big sticking point in the freedom versus security debate.

    But under the Bush Administration, in retrospect, I’m amazed they even got CIA guys talking to Mohammad. They could have just sent in Karl Rove and the ’04 reelection committee to do all the interrogating and I wouldn’t have been surprised in the least.

  3. 3.

    El Cid

    April 23, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    It’s not just torture. The foreign policy establishment insists on the grand right to do any illegal and horrific activity which occurs to it, and simultaneously reluctantly agrees to whatever legalistic and plausible deniability hoops are required.

    So, if you want the CIA operations directorate to be able to hire terrorists and assassins and provoke coups, etc., you’ve got to make sure that doesn’t come back to looking like any official consciously and openly decided that.

    So when Ronald Reagan wants to hire a bunch of genocidal evangelical Guatemalan generals to slaughter the Mayan hill-dwelling population in order to protect a decades-old military tyranny which originated with the tax preferences of a U.S. agri-business, including arms, funds, diplomatic protection, PR assistance, and logistical aid, then you have to make sure to put up whatever false walls are required to keep anyone from ever really being ever to tie the leaders, i.e., Reagan to the systematic mass murder of several tens of thousands of innocent civilians.

    Oliver North understood this, and openly declared to Congress that he didn’t give a sh!t what they pretended to want to know. Ollie knew that Congress didn’t want its hands dirty either, and they like the deceit, as long as you don’t cross their prerogatives too much so that you get Congress in trouble for any oversight failures.

    The U.S. foreign policy establishment is far more committed to its prized ability to act illegally and horrendously anywhere, any way, any how, in world affairs than they are to any rational conceptions of U.S. security or national interests.

  4. 4.

    srv

    April 23, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    reintroduced the so-called Chinese wall between the C.I.A. and F.B.I., similar to the communications obstacles that prevented us from working together to stop the 9/11

    This is a canard. There was no legal obstacle that prevented the communication that would have helped. This was an ex-post facto excuse to cover their ass and blame Clinton.

  5. 5.

    SGEW

    April 23, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    They could have just sent in Karl Rove and the ‘04 reelection committee to do all the interrogating and I wouldn’t have been surprised in the least.

    A fascinating parenthetical in the Ali Soufan op-ed:

    (It’s worth noting that when reading between the lines of the newly released memos, it seems clear that it was contractors, not C.I.A. officers, who requested the use of these techniques.)

    Probably not Rove and his buddies, but you might not be so far off.

    [edit: btw, what happened w/ th’ blockquotes? I used to be able to get rid of the bolding, but my [blockquote][p]text[/p][/blockquote] trick no longer seems to work. pout.]

  6. 6.

    Napoleon

    April 23, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Well the Republican party has become the party of stupid.

  7. 7.

    omen

    April 23, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    what a reliance on torture highlights is that we lacked human assets on the ground, who spoke the language, who could infiltrate the taliban or al qaeda,

    the complaint about an overreliance on technology at the expense of developing human intel has been made for years and years. bush had 8 years to build this up but failed to do so. this failure so didn’t make the country safer. bush administration fired arabic speakers instead because they were gay.

  8. 8.

    DougJ

    April 23, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    Jamie Gorelick personally caused 9/11 with her librul Chinese walls.

    I’ve read that word-for-word in a variety of places.

  9. 9.

    SGEW

    April 23, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    Well the Republican party has become the party of stupid.

    It cannot be said enough:

    “It’s like these guys take pride in being ignorant.”

  10. 10.

    Cat Lady

    April 23, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    Here come the drip drip drips. Intel silos kept as many people in the dark as possible about the fact that they needed a false justification to go to Iraq, which is what they wanted to do from Bush’s first day in office. It’s going to get harder and harder for all but the hardest core delusional wingnuts to justify torture to get a false confession. The “keeping us safe” meme is going down in flames.

  11. 11.

    gopher2b

    April 23, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    I know an FBI agent who worked at Guatanomo Bay and he has told me similar things. The FBI would get good information from people right up until the CIA made them “disappear” and it was all over. The FBI approach was dependent on building a relationship with the detainee and the CIA kept f’ing it up. Look at everything the FBI got out of Saddam by sharing cigars with him.

  12. 12.

    El Cid

    April 23, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    “It’s like these guys take pride in being ignorant.”

    I agree with that, except for the “it’s like” part. Cf Joe Barton, (R-Chuck Norris Empire).

  13. 13.

    sparky

    April 23, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    @El Cid: well that explains it all–no wonder we can’t find Bin Laden–he’s really Max Weber!

    /testing the limits of obscure comments

  14. 14.

    omen

    April 23, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    didn’t ashcroft initially refuse a request by one of the agencies to examine moussaoui’s laptop?

  15. 15.

    Stooleo

    April 23, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    Good post by Sully on how they handled interrogations when it really mattered.

  16. 16.

    RememberNovember

    April 23, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    Contractors= Blackwater goons who pleasure themselves to the centerfolds of Soldier of Fortune.

  17. 17.

    pragmatic idealist

    April 23, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    I heard Gorelick speak about this back when the Rightards were slamming her. She said the policy in question had been in place pre-Clinton. (can’t remember how many years)

  18. 18.

    TenguPhule

    April 23, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    Well the Republican party has become the party of stupid.

    What do you mean become? It never stopped.

  19. 19.

    RememberNovember

    April 23, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    @TenguPhule:

    Actually it started with Barry Goldwater.

  20. 20.

    garyb50

    April 23, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    2 words: Shock Doctrine.

  21. 21.

    dmbeaster

    April 23, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    The Gorelick “Chinese Wall” was in place beforehand and still exists to some extent. It is based on the notion that you should not have intelligence gathering done overseas by methods illegal in the US then tainting criminal investigations. It raises real trouble with subsequent criminal prosecution in the case was put together in part with evidence obtained by means that are not legal for criminal prosecution. Nothing wrong with those methods for national security purposes, though. You just have to keep the efforts separate if you are serious about criminal prosecutions.

    Kind of like how it is now hard to crimnally prosecute terrorists who we tortured to get confessions, or when the evidence against them was obtained by torture.

  22. 22.

    kay

    April 23, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    @Stooleo:

    It is great. It gets to the main point, which is “in custody”, IMO. I think if you’re going to back torture, you made a choice, and you should know what you’ve decided. You’ve decided that you can brutalize those you picked up and made helpless, and that’s a big idea to abandon.

    “The Commandant obtained results without recourse to assault and battery. It was the very basis of Camp 020 procedure that nobody raised a hand against a prisoner.”

  23. 23.

    Perry Como

    April 23, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    Here’s an article from 2006 with more on Soufan. It also touches on the “wall” between intelligence agencies. It was more about bureaucratic pissing matches than anything else. A bunch of career power jockeys were getting butthurt because someone was stepping on their turf.

  24. 24.

    tofubo

    April 23, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    compare

    An F.B.I. colleague of mine who knew more about Khalid Shaikh Mohammed than anyone in the government was not allowed to speak to him.

    with

    Of all those speaking those two days, one person in particular caught Garner’s attention. Scrambling to catch up with the best thinking, Garner was looking for someone who had assembled the facts and who knew all the players in the U.S. government, the Iraqi exile community, and international organizations, and had considered the second-and third-order consequences of possible actions. While everyone else was fumbling for facts, this man had dozens of binders, tabbed amd indexed, on every aspect of Iaqi society, from how electricity was generated to how the port of Basra operated, recalled another participant.

    “They had better stuff in those binders than the ‘eyes only’ stuff I eventually got from the CIA,” said a military expert who attended.

    “There’s this one guy who knew everything, everybody, and he kept on talking,” Garner recalled. At lunch, Garner took him aside. Who are you? the old general asked. Tom Warrick, the man answered.

    “How come you know all this?” Garner asked.

    “I’ve been working on this for a year,” Warrick said. He said he was at the State Department, where he headed a project called the Future of Iraq, a sprawling effort that relied heavily on the expertise of Iraqi exiles.

    “Come to work for me on Monday,” Garner said.

    And Warrick did just that. A few days later Rumsfeld takes Garner aside and tells him he has to get rid of Warrick. “I can’t,” says Garner. He’s good, he’s smart, and he knows a ton about Iraq. Rumseld says there’s nothing he can do; the order comes from above. Garner goes to see Stephen Hadley, deputy director of the National Security Council. Hadley can’t do anything either. Later Richard Armitage explains it to Ricks. “Anybody that knows anything is removed.” And Warrick was removed from Garner’s team, undoubtedly on Cheney’s orders.

    planned kaos, the better to steal

  25. 25.

    The Cat Who Would Be Tunch

    April 23, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @omen:

    what a reliance on torture highlights is that we lacked human assets on the ground, who spoke the language, who could infiltrate the taliban or al qaeda,

    The CIA saw an increase of 5%, from 13% to 18%, over the last eight years in terms of people who were charged deciphering/translating intelligence that could speak a language other than English. Great strides, eh?

  26. 26.

    Sasha

    April 23, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @SGEW:

    A fascinating parenthetical in the Ali Soufan op-ed:

    (It’s worth noting that when reading between the lines of the newly released memos, it seems clear that it was contractors, not C.I.A. officers, who requested the use of these techniques.)

    Haliburton or Blackwater?

  27. 27.

    The Pale Scot

    April 23, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    I googled Gorelick to refresh my memory and this is what I found at Wikipedia;

    ‘Gorelick grew up in Great Neck, New York where she attended South High School and at the time was known to get around with boys and numerous male teachers”

    Like, WTF?!

  28. 28.

    mikefromtexas

    April 23, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    Anyone remember the Phoenix memo???? Written by an FBI field agent that somehow got all the way to Tenet’s desk at CIA in spite of that nasty wall Gorelick didn’t create? Only problem is it didn’t get half way up the chain at the FBI.

  29. 29.

    Dave S

    April 23, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    I recall that a major finding of the 9/11 commission was that on 9/11, few of the emergency agencies was able to communicate effectively with others. FAA <> Air Force. NY city police <> NY state police <> NJ police. NY police <> NY fire dept. FBI <> CIA. Etc., etc.

    Wasn’t one of the justifications of the Department of Defending the Motherland Homeland Security that we needed to bring various agencies together in order to remove bureaucratic barriers to effective interagency communication?

    The CIA not effectively communicating with the FBI on matters of national security (“we heard traffic in Syria about something in the US that we, the CIA, can’t deal with; hey Fibbies, heads up!”) is Really Bad, imho.

  30. 30.

    Houston criminal lawyer

    April 24, 2009 at 6:43 am

    I agree that we should have other ways to infiltrate and find out more about the terrorist attacks. I wonder how much you can trust from confessions obtained through torture. Not only is there the legal question of whether or not the admittance will hold up in law, but the question to the right to obtain counsel. In my summary, using torture is merely to gain information and not build a case for prosecution, since that case will be hard to prove that prisoner rights were upheld. The fact that the two arms of the government were not communicating is disheartening.

  31. 31.

    Mark

    April 24, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    I find statements like these to be very interesting “An F.B.I. colleague of mine who knew more about Khalid Shaikh Mohammed than anyone in the government was not allowed to speak to him.”

    Exactly how was this gentlemen awarded the “knows most about Khalid Shaikh Mohammed” award? Was there an exam of some kind that everyone in intelligence community had to take? Of course nobody questions this statement however baseless it is. It could be that he indeed know the most about Khalid, but somehow I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » MIDDAY ROUNDUP says:
    June 19, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    […] FROM THE BLOGS: Speaks for Itself – J. Marshall, TPM Boehner Calls it Torture – Andrew Sullivan Not Just Criminal, but Stupid – J. Cole, Balloon Juice Klein: Jim Jones is Trouble – M. Goldfarb, Weekly Standard Recessions and […]

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • schrodingers_cat on Medium Cool – Give Us A Song and Tell Us Your Story (Jan 29, 2023 @ 9:02pm)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 339: The Strategist’s Enemy Is Time (Jan 29, 2023 @ 9:02pm)
  • Matt McIrvin on Medium Cool – Give Us A Song and Tell Us Your Story (Jan 29, 2023 @ 9:01pm)
  • Steeplejack on Medium Cool – Give Us A Song and Tell Us Your Story (Jan 29, 2023 @ 9:01pm)
  • kalakal on Medium Cool – Give Us A Song and Tell Us Your Story (Jan 29, 2023 @ 9:00pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!