• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Not all heroes wear capes.

I see no possible difficulties whatsoever with this fool-proof plan.

The GOP is a fucking disgrace.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

Hot air and ill-informed banter

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

No one could have predicted…

Everybody saw this coming.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

The words do not have to be perfect.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Let’s finish the job.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Domestic Politics / Flag City, U.S.A.

Flag City, U.S.A.

by Kay|  August 13, 201012:49 pm| 21 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

FINDLAY — A lesbian cadet and recent Findlay High School graduate asked this week to resign from the U.S. Military Academy because she no longer can lie about her sexuality and was troubled by the anti-gay attitudes of some of those around her. Katherine Miller of Findlay also said she wants to fight for repeal of the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ law, a subject she was studying and writing about as a sophomore sociology major at West Point.

I intend for my resignation to offer a concrete example of the consequences of a failed law and social policy,’ Ms. Miller, a 2008 Findlay graduate, wrote in her resignation letter on Monday, referring to the law against gays serving openly in the military.

She earlier had told the Times Herald-Record in New York that she was openly gay to her family and friends during high school. In the letter, she said she fabricated a heterosexual dating history to share with any fellow cadets who asked. ‘In short, I have lied to my classmates and compromised my integrity and identity by adhering to existing military policy,’ she said.

Here

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Unexpected Delays
Next Post: Immigration reform and birthright citizenship »

Reader Interactions

21Comments

  1. 1.

    cleek

    August 13, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    see, that’s why we shouldn’t allow gays in the military: they lie!

    /idiot

  2. 2.

    Bob Loblaw

    August 13, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    Wasn’t the Senate supposed to have taken care of this little problem months ago? I remember every good little Obot telling us it was a done deal before Memorial Day. When are they voting on the Defense Authorization bill, October? Lame duck session?

    If the votes don’t materialize, I don’t see how GLBT can ever trust the administration or Congress again for a long time.

  3. 3.

    stuckinred

    August 13, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    She was on Rachel the other night. What a shame to lose someone with her potential as a leader.

  4. 4.

    The Moar You Know

    August 13, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    see, that’s why we shouldn’t allow gays in the military: they lie!

    @cleek: There’s more than a small nugget of truth in your snark. This young woman should never have joined; she knows the rules as well as the rest of us. Neither should any other gay citizen.

    Call it a boycott if you like.

    Until DADT is overturned by either executive order (not the best option) or by legislation, gay citizens should damned well boycott the military. It’s sick that the military has been playing this game with queer folks for almost twenty years now, where they will allow them to serve if they lie constantly about what they are. I’d go so far as to call the policy positively sadistic.

  5. 5.

    cleek

    August 13, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    @Bob Loblaw:

    Wasn’t the Senate supposed to have taken care of this little problem months ago?

    i don’t know why this makes me laugh as much as it does.

  6. 6.

    Anoniminous

    August 13, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    Blacks … women … now Homos. How many times do we have to go through this bloody assed nonsense?

  7. 7.

    Linda Featheringill

    August 13, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    Well, the young lady is well and truly out now. On the other hand, nobody can blackmail her about that.

    She should continue her activism. The Road of Life is funny and often takes several twists and turns. You really don’t know where it leads.

    Blessings on the young lady. May she live long and prosper.

  8. 8.

    Rosalita

    August 13, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    @The Moar You Know:

    Until DADT is overturned by either executive order (not the best option) or by legislation, gay citizens should damned well boycott the military. It’s sick that the military has been playing this game with queer folks for almost twenty years now, where they will allow them to serve if they lie constantly about what they are. I’d go so far as to call the policy positively sadistic.

    Do you think that realistically the military will ever be accepting of them? I agree with you; I just wonder if the culture will ever change…

  9. 9.

    The Moar You Know

    August 13, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    Do you think that realistically the military will ever be accepting of them? I agree with you; I just wonder if the culture will ever change…

    @Rosalita: Unequivocally the answer is yes. It took blacks 50 years since Truman desegregated the military in 1948 to be fully accepted, but they are. Women – not quite there yet, but already far more accepted in far more many roles than they were back in the 1990s. Gay folk will have a struggle but it will get done.

  10. 10.

    Rosalita

    August 13, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    @The Moar You Know:

    I hope you are right, I hate to see anyone tormented just because they have the nerve to want to serve our country…and yeah, the harassment that female soldiers still have to deal with comes to mind…as if enemy fire weren’t enough to watch for

  11. 11.

    HumboldtBlue

    August 13, 2010 at 1:20 pm

    To echo Moar, yes, Rosalita, the military will more than accept them. Stop thinking of the military as some right-wing bastion, it’s not. It’s as diverse as the rest of society and one of the reasons conservatives hate the idea of allowing gays and lesbians to openly serve is that once it’s ensconced in the military opponents and bigots have no recourse left — there are no street demonstrations on military bases. You obey orders, whether they come from a gay superior or a straight one.

    Just as yesterday, when Judge Walker ruled to lift the stay next week, the folks backing the trial here in Cali were getting frantic emails from others around the country to stop now, don’t pursue it any further because they fear once it gets to the Supremes and they lose, they will lose all the bigoted laws they have managed to get passed in 31 other states.

    They are desperately trying to hold onto their bigotry-as-the-norm when the walls of their fortresses of dumbassery crumble around them. Let gays serve and what’s next? They can vote? (eerie, eerie similarity to that argument and the argument during the Civil War about letting Negroes serve, particularly in the South) They can demand equal protection under the law? They can get married, buy a house and live happily ever after?

    That’s their nightmare and one vehicle to social change that has been proven to be extremely effective is social change within the military where resistance is the same as disobedience, intolerable.

  12. 12.

    freelancer

    August 13, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    @stuckinred:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGcbvuerCfQ

    Maddow’s interview with Miller.

  13. 13.

    TomG

    August 13, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    I know that suggesting that we look at what other countries’ policies are is considered anathema to many, but I just looked it up and as of June 2009, 25 countries allow gays to openly serve in their military. Including Israel, Canada, South Africa (!), Spain, and the United Kingdom.
    If there was definite evidence of a problem because of this, I would have expected the homophobes to have brought it up by now and to use such evidence to back their claim that the U.S. simply cannot allow the repeal of DADT.
    Since this hasn’t happened, I conclude that countries which allow gay people to serve in their military have (for the most part) not found it to create the problems that are assumed to be inevitable.
    So….Why again is the U.S. forbidding gay people from serving openly in the military ??

  14. 14.

    Rosalita

    August 13, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    @HumboldtBlue:

    Stop thinking of the military as some right-wing bastion

    I don’t think of it that way, my stepfather and my boyfriend are both retired military and both liberal as can be. But just as with any group of people, not everyone feels that way. My stepfather says there are two camps at the Legion bar, the liberal group and then the racist, homophobic, misogynist one.
    I’m a worry-wart, what can I say?

  15. 15.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    August 13, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    I dunno; based on my experience of the Army in the 00s, it’s much more conservative than the general population. There’s a disportionate number of people who cone small towns and rural America, and it shows. Don’t get me started on the ubiquitous evangelical Protestsnt chaplains. Granted, ymmv depending on your MOS, unit, etc.

  16. 16.

    stuckinred

    August 13, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    @Rosalita: I have a very good friend who was SF in the Nam and he, like Pat Lang at Sic Semper Tyrannis, are vehemently opposed to gays serving openly in the military. They are convinced it is the start of all kinds of special requests being made by this “interest group”. I had gay friends in both Korea and Vietnam and it had no impact on their ability to do their job. I don’t know if there would be any difference in line outfits or the spook operations.

  17. 17.

    Rosalita

    August 13, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    @stuckinred:

    You’d think if someone made through special ops training they would garner enough respect that sexual orientation wouldn’t matter. I’ll ask the boyfriend (USAF ParaRescue), and see what he says.

    PS-stepfather has become so disgusted with morans at his local Legion he barely goes there anymore.

  18. 18.

    stuckinred

    August 13, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    @Rosalita: Here’s Lang’s post

    The farcical process of authorizing the open military service of gay people is yet to play out, but the outcome of that process is foreordained. The Gay Movement has powerful friends in government and the media. In a year or so, the force will begin to be somewhat different and that difference will grow greater as time passes and gay soldiers become more confident of the security of their position.

  19. 19.

    dj spellchecka

    August 13, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    not to get in a big food fight, but the military, especially the officer class, overwhelmingly identifies as republicans according to the last study i read….

    and not to trivialize this story, but greg rucka’s origin story for the newest version of batwoman is virtually identical to katherine miller’s …..

  20. 20.

    JNobot

    August 13, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    We never would have had DADT if Clinton were in the White House!

  21. 21.

    Zuzu's Petals

    August 13, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    Well, at least she resigned before she’d be required to commit to finishing her four years (at risk of having to repay the academy) and serving her five years on active duty. Possibly she agonized over this decision until the last practical moment.

    What a shame.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Mike Furlan on Cake Watch: Day 2 (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:36pm)
  • Sister Machine Gun of Quiet Harmony on Cake Watch: Day 2 (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:34pm)
  • Sister Golden Bear on Cake Watch: Day 2 (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:33pm)
  • rikyrah on Cake Watch: Day 2 (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:33pm)
  • Roger Moore on Cake Watch: Day 2 (Mar 28, 2023 @ 4:31pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!