• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Some judge needs to shut this circus down soon.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

I was promised a recession.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Bad news for Ron DeSantis is great news for America.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

The revolution will be supervised.

I really should read my own blog.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Past Elections / Election 2012 / Webb Out

Webb Out

by John Cole|  February 9, 201111:37 am| 136 Comments

This post is in: Election 2012

FacebookTweetEmail

Everything Mistermix said about Jon Tester can probably be said about Jim Webb in Virginia, who has announced he will not seek re-election. The possibility that George Allen might be the next Senator from Virginia just increased greatly.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « I’m Not as Hopeful
Next Post: Things done changed »

Reader Interactions

136Comments

  1. 1.

    Culture of Truth

    February 9, 2011 at 11:42 am

    George Allen was publicly humiliated. What does it take to make these people go away?

  2. 2.

    Scott

    February 9, 2011 at 11:42 am

    Webb is out already? Didn’t he just get elected?

  3. 3.

    nevsky42

    February 9, 2011 at 11:42 am

    If Allen makes it past the Repub primary, which is not a given.

    Who now? Terry McAuliffe? Brian Moran? Tom Perriello? Let the speculation run rampant!

    Senator Perriello…I like the way that sounds.

  4. 4.

    NobodySpecial

    February 9, 2011 at 11:42 am

    No defender of weak Dems has yet explained how simply electing weak Dems who spurn ‘leftist’ ideas and vote conservatively leads to electing better Dems down the road.

    Instead, the thinking seems to run like this:

    Step 1: Elect Blue Dog
    Step 2: ???
    Step 3: Elect actual liberal!

    Of course, the key is that Step 2 never ever ever happens.

  5. 5.

    Will

    February 9, 2011 at 11:42 am

    God this is upsetting. One and done, Webb? WTF? I think he would have had a real shot against Allen. He’s still remembered pretty poisonously.

  6. 6.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    February 9, 2011 at 11:43 am

    Yeah, no doubt we’ll wind up with some Republican or another, a predictable backlash to the left’s overreach.

  7. 7.

    Alex S.

    February 9, 2011 at 11:43 am

    Not good… maybe Tim Kaine can replace him.

  8. 8.

    Dave

    February 9, 2011 at 11:44 am

    Yay for Progressive Purity!! Now a real progressive can get the Dem nomination. Sure, they’ll lose hard in the election but at least we can feel good about ourselves.

  9. 9.

    EconWatcher

    February 9, 2011 at 11:45 am

    This is a shame. I was proud to have Webb as my senator.

    Presumably Tim Kaine will now be the nominee. I don’t like his chances as well as Webb’s.

    Webb has a certain “paleo” and Scotts-Irish veneer that helps him in the mountainous areas of the state. Kaine is a lot easier to paint as a pointy-headed liberal.

  10. 10.

    Punchy

    February 9, 2011 at 11:45 am

    He’s going back in the private $$$$ector. Military contracting, methinks.

    Allen is a shoe-in.

  11. 11.

    Violet

    February 9, 2011 at 11:45 am

    But the election is 2012, right? That’s a Presidential year. That could change the equation some.

  12. 12.

    mistermix

    February 9, 2011 at 11:47 am

    I’m looking forward to Webb’s account of the jackasses and prima donnas that he had to deal with in the Senate.

  13. 13.

    David Fud

    February 9, 2011 at 11:48 am

    What is with these gadflies anyway? For a while there, I thought the natural order of things was to have a nice fat D majority, given the bat-shit insanity of the Rs.

    However, it seems that there’s never quite enough of them no matter how many of them that there are. I now find it hard to care about how many Ds there are in the senate so long as it is 50 or so.

    One-and-done. What a deal. Seems like he was running to make a point and then had a chance to make a point. Where did that guy go?

  14. 14.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 11:49 am

    So…one step closer to a Republican filibuster-proof majority in the Senate? Yaaaay. :/

  15. 15.

    gene108

    February 9, 2011 at 11:49 am

    @NobodySpecial:

    Step 2 = convince public liberal policies are good, therefore people running on liberal policies will get elected.

    Right now the Professional Left is too interested in attacking dissenters within the Democratic Party, rather than pushing an agenda and making Americans agree with it.

    Embracing in liberal policies, right now, is a ticket to electoral disaster for many elected officials. It’s not their fault they run away from liberal policies.

    Wouldn’t you run away from something, if embracing it would cost you your job? Can you blame somebody for not wanting to get laid off?

    Until people can run on a single-payer for all platform and get elected, don’t blame them for not tilting more to the left.

  16. 16.

    NobodySpecial

    February 9, 2011 at 11:51 am

    @gene108: How do you convince the public in a given district that liberal policies are good if the Democrat you elect there won’t defend them or articulate them, but instead spends his time articulating the other party’s policies as good ideas?

    EDIT – given that Webb will make a LOT more in the private sector than the public one, exactly what is he giving up besides face time by quitting?

  17. 17.

    Culture of Truth

    February 9, 2011 at 11:51 am

    Yeah I wonder if Webbb is restless in the Senate, maybe thinking about something more suited to his personality, like Sec. of Defense.

  18. 18.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 11:53 am

    @gene108:

    But here we have a distinct problem where many who did run away from liberal positions (some as fast as possible) in order to preserve their jobs lost them anyway. Many of us, hardly the ‘professional left’ realize there’s a ‘damned if you do, damned if you don’t’ situation for many Dems. My take on the matter is that for most of them, you’re gonna be painted as a dirty fucking hippie no matter how hard to the right you try and cant. So if your politics are really that malleable, why not go full bore and actually stand for something rather than bending at first glance of Republican opposition?

  19. 19.

    Legalize

    February 9, 2011 at 11:54 am

    No doubt Webb was just overwhelmed by the bitter partisanship he experienced in the Senate. Now he can retire from public service and spend his golden years doing something that gives him the warm and fuzzies, plus he can avoid all that nasty bickering in Washington – you know, working as military contracting lobbyist.

  20. 20.

    NobodySpecial

    February 9, 2011 at 11:55 am

    @Kryptik: I can answer that.

    The answer is that for the professional critic of the professional left, there is no hill to die on. Ever.

  21. 21.

    Suffern ACE

    February 9, 2011 at 11:56 am

    @NobodySpecial: Blue dogs will vote for “blue causes” when blue causes become “uncontroversial.” Step 2-?? are changes in the public sphere where blue dogs don’t feel like they’ll be punished by their voters for supporting things. It’s also the area where liberals fall down miserably most of the time because it involves the long game and also the institutional weakness that comes from not having control of the media, a poor policy “think tank” establishment, opinion writers who are based heavily in the Northeast and frankly disdain the unwashed masses as much as any conservative, and the fact that lobbying for business or joining a PE firm is just so lucrative.

  22. 22.

    Jay

    February 9, 2011 at 11:56 am

    @EconWatcher:

    “Kaine is a lot easier to paint as a pointy-headed liberal.”

    I’m not so sure. He was a missionary for a time, which means conservative “religious” voters will at least give him a look.

    And doesn’t Webb’s departure mean the Dems will now run an especially aggressive campaign in MA in their effort to break even?

    Bay Staters, say hello to candidate Vicki Kennedy.

  23. 23.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 11:59 am

    @Suffern ACE:

    But again, they don’t exactly help when they actively subvert all efforts to make such ‘blue causes’ uncontroversial by enabling and lauding all the ‘red causes’ while shitting on the ‘blue causes’.

  24. 24.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    Webb was, is, and will be a jerk. Fuck him.

  25. 25.

    Mike in NC

    February 9, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @Culture of Truth:

    What does it take to make these people go away?

    A stake through the heart? Lots of garlic? George Allen is every bit as big an empty suit as Rick Santorum. He was a terrible governor and would be an even worse senator. Was happy to vote against him when I could. Webb’s skin is too damn thin for his own good.

  26. 26.

    amk

    February 9, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    paging markos and jane. Now is your chance to put your money and shine. Good luck and all that.

  27. 27.

    kindness

    February 9, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @Culture of Truth: More like some 6 or 7 figure lobbying job.

  28. 28.

    NobodySpecial

    February 9, 2011 at 12:03 pm

    @Kryptik: As usual, Nothing Can Be Done.

  29. 29.

    Hunter Gathers

    February 9, 2011 at 12:03 pm

    @David Fud:

    Seems like he was running to make a point and then had a chance to make a point. Where did that guy go?

    He never existed. All he wanted was the increased celebrity. He doesn’t do anything, other than bitch about how bad rural Scots-Irish in Appalachia have it. You’d think that he would introduce legislation to help them, but that would entail actual action, and that would cut down the amount of time he spends doing nothing. At least he’ll have more of an opportunity to write crappy war novels.

  30. 30.

    Elizabelle

    February 9, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    Tim Kaine or Tom Perriello would be my first guesses/choices.

    Kaine’s father in law is Linwood Holton, moderate Republican governor who was popular in his time. Tim is very smart and empathetic and connects well. He was mayor of Richmond.

    Perriello is a smart young voice for healthcare reform and other bread and butter issues.

    Suspect either would be competitive.

    Race is George Allen’s to lose, being Virginia.

    And recall: Virginia elected crazy ass Ken Cuccinelli to Attorney General and not moderate Bob McDonnell governor.

    Maybe there’s enough buyer’s remorse?

    Northern Virginia is purple/blue.

  31. 31.

    ET

    February 9, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    I would say I was glad that I wouldn’t have this moron represent me but I live in DC and the subcommittee that oversees the DC budget won’t let our Delegate or locals testify about how the monies that DC collects are spent.

  32. 32.

    Elizabelle

    February 9, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    @Hunter Gathers:

    Don’t agree. There’s a lot more to Jim Webb.

    He has a young family and might be sick of the poisonous climate in the Senate.

    What would be my fantasy: JOHN WARNER coming back and running on the Democratic ticket.

    Yes, he deserves his retirement, but he was a great Senator and a grown up.

  33. 33.

    Allison Wonderland

    February 9, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    Yes, clearly Webb is retiring because the far left hurt his fee-fee’s. Bad far left, bad far left.

  34. 34.

    The Moar You Know

    February 9, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    Voting for Blue Dogs is a waste of time and money. Purity, not victory, is the prize. Look at how well it has served the teabaggers, with their stellar 1 for 4 record.

    Keep fucking that chicken.

    Maoism is the new black.

  35. 35.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    @Allison Wonderland:

    Unfortunately, I see that becoming the conventional wisdom soon. “Why are those ubiquitous far left hippies so fucking hateful, why can’t they all just die and make America better by going away?! See how they run off good people for their ideological facism?! Why can’t we just kill them all and make America clean again!?”

  36. 36.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:10 pm

    @Elizabelle: “Kerry and Webb are decorated Vietnam veterans, but they would hardly be described as close friends. Webb has said he refused for 20 years to shake hands with Kerry because of Kerry’s outspoken criticism of the war after his return from Vietnam and his alignment with the antiwar movement.” Like I said, fuck him.

  37. 37.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 12:10 pm

    @The Moar You Know:

    Oh, fuckin’ please. The Teabaggers might not have won most of their explicit elections, but they didn’t need to. They fuckin’ run the whole GOP at this point.

  38. 38.

    trollhattan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    Yee-haw, time to print up a batch of “macaca” tshirts?

    Ruining the country, one state at a time.

  39. 39.

    DecidedFenceSitter

    February 9, 2011 at 12:17 pm

    As a Novite – I’m going with Kaine – popular governor, ballet with presumably Obama on the ballot, and he knows how to throw an elbow or two.

  40. 40.

    matoko_chan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:17 pm

    i think this is waaaaaay more interesting.
    Has Peak Oil already peaked?
    props, my Hero Julian Assange.
    Inshallah those False Commanders of the Faithful, the Saud princes, will live to deeply and profoundly regret the shaitan bargain they struck with the West.
    ;)

  41. 41.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    @matoko_chan: sup knuckle head?

  42. 42.

    FlipYrWhig

    February 9, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    @Kryptik:

    My take on the matter is that for most of them, you’re gonna be painted as a dirty fucking hippie no matter how hard to the right you try and cant. So if your politics are really that malleable, why not go full bore and actually stand for something rather than bending at first glance of Republican opposition?

    But you’re assuming that conservative Democrats are conservative solely because they think that’s how to get re-elected. Some of them actually believe it. They vote and stand for what they genuinely think. And it’s not liberal.

  43. 43.

    somethingblue

    February 9, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    @NobodySpecial:

    Instead, the thinking seems to run like this:

    Step 1: Elect Blue Dog
    Step 2: ???
    Step 3: Elect actual liberal!

    Of course, the key is that Step 2 never ever ever happens.

    On the contrary. The Democratic Party expends most of its time and energy on step 2.

  44. 44.

    Jablowski

    February 9, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    No fan of Webb – he’s struck me as a preening prima donna – but George Allen is loathsome.

  45. 45.

    Davis X. Machina

    February 9, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    Cuccicinelli runs, wins primary. Spite independent run by Allen — or the other way round.

    Seat stays Democratic. Virginia is just that much bluer than Alaska.

    I think in time the CT ’06 Senate race will turn out to have been a harbinger of the future, and three-cornered Senate races will become less of an anomaly.

  46. 46.

    Hunter Gathers

    February 9, 2011 at 12:22 pm

    @Elizabelle: Hating the place you work at is one thing. Making it easier for George Fucking Allen to replace you is another.

  47. 47.

    Texas Dem

    February 9, 2011 at 12:24 pm

    You can hardly blame Webb for wanting out. The Senate is a highly dysfunctional and increasingly partisan institution, and takes a very, very long time to work your way up to a committee chair, where you have some real clout. Webb was never built for that kind of political grind. Once he found out how truly awful the place was, he ran for the door. Can’t say I blame him.

  48. 48.

    Paul in KY

    February 9, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    @stuckinred: But he was ‘our’ jerk. The jerk that held a Senate seat for us in Virginia.

  49. 49.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    @Texas Dem: He was the goddamn secretary of the Navy, he knew what the score was goin in.

  50. 50.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    @Paul in KY: for you maybe

  51. 51.

    gwangung

    February 9, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    Ya know, spending most of your time screaming at folks for electing Blue Dogs is kinda missing the point. More productive to creating conditions that allow a more progressive candidate to win.

    In the meantime, Blue Dogs voting with you 60% of the time is better than Republicans voting against you 100%.

  52. 52.

    The Moar You Know

    February 9, 2011 at 12:30 pm

    Inshallah those False Commanders of the Faithful, the Saud princes, will live to deeply and profoundly regret the shaitan bargain they struck with the West.

    @matoko_chan: Sadly, no. They’ll be dead and rotting in Jahannam. It’s their children and their grandchildren who will be chased out of their marble palaces and staked and burned by angry mobs when the oil money runs out.

    Overpopulated, with no other resources, no ability to grow food, no water and no future. The Middle East by the end of this century will truly be hell on earth.

  53. 53.

    gene108

    February 9, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    @NobodySpecial:

    How do you convince the public in a given district that liberal policies are good if the Democrat you elect there won’t defend them or articulate them, but instead spends his time articulating the other party’s policies as good ideas?

    How did modern conservatism gain the clout it did, when the #2 vote getter in the 1980 Republican Presidential Primary, George Bush, Sr. dubbed his opponent, the #1 vote getter and Presidential nominee, Ronald Reagan’s economic policy as “voodoo economics”?

    There wasn’t broad support for Reaganomics, especially after the 1982 drubbing Republicans absorbed in the mid-terms. Many Northeastern Republicans didn’t embrace the Southern evangelism, which Reagan gave a seat to at the Republican table, by giving the movements of folks like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson created a seat at the Republican table.

    Yet the economic forces of supply-siders, tax-cutting nut cases like Grover Norquist and religious fundamentalists have taken over the Republican Party.

    How did they do it? Can Liberals do the same thing in the Democratic Party?

    The change in the Republican Party post-Reagan didn’t happen overnight. It took a lot of dedicated work by the forces, who now run the Party.

  54. 54.

    Paul in KY

    February 9, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    @stuckinred: I just would rather have that son of a bitch in there than George fucking Allen, that’s all.

    Understand your distaste for him. He pissed me off alot back when he was in Reagan’s cabinet.

  55. 55.

    IM

    February 9, 2011 at 12:32 pm

    @Texas Dem:

    I think frustation about the lacking power of a junior senator was a motive.

  56. 56.

    matoko_chan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:32 pm

    @stuckinred: not much, i just ruined eugene volokh’s day, and i dropped in here for a lil’ cudlip hazing.
    the twilight of the american empire….can you taste it stuckin?

    lay down little doggies, lay down.
    we both gotta sleep on the cold cold ground
    the winds a blowin colder
    an the suns goin down
    lay down little doggies, lay down.

    hahahahaha

  57. 57.

    Paul in KY

    February 9, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    @The Moar You Know: I wish I would get to live to see that (the chasing out of marble palaces, and staked, etc.).

    Sigh…

  58. 58.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    February 9, 2011 at 12:34 pm

    @Elizabelle:

    he was a great Senator

    “great”? From what I’ve seen, I’d be willing to go as far as “could have been worse”, and likely would have been if people like Nelson and Lincoln and Bayh weren’t throwing the monkey wrenches into the works so that he didn’t have to. If there is an issue or a piece of legislation that was significantly advanced by Jim Webb in the last five years, I didn’t hear of it.

  59. 59.

    Texas Dem

    February 9, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    @Davis X. Machina: I hope you’re right, but recent events suggest the race is Allen’s to lose. And it’s far from clear whether Obama will be re-electable in 2012, given a likely unemployment rate of over 8 percent. Moreover, if we have undivided GOP control in 2013,anyone care to lay odds on how long it will take the GOP to do away with the filibuster so they can repeal Obamacare, since there’s no way (even under the most optimistic projections) that they’ll get anywhere close to 60 seats? Then again, I have a relatively secure government job (no layoffs at my department), no children, and very little debt, so I can afford to be cynical about these things.

  60. 60.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:37 pm

    @matoko_chan: Don’t mean nuthin to me either way.

  61. 61.

    Ron

    February 9, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    I don’t think the idea behind electing somewhat conservative democrats is to miraculously turn it into electing progressives. I think the idea is that the conservative democrats are still miles better than the crazy GOP alternatives.

  62. 62.

    Allan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    Weigel notes that a November 2010 poll showed Kaine performing better against Allen than Webb. This is far from over for the Democrats.

  63. 63.

    matoko_chan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    @The Moar You Know: yup. MENA will become a monster reaver factory focused on revenge against the west in general and america in particular.
    less see….according to social network theory Iraq alone created at least 109000^2 revenge motivated potential jihadis, considering negative influence propagation along both social and bloodkinship connections.
    Gonna be hell on earth for Our Crazy Ex-GF Israel too, isnt it?
    muwahahaha!

  64. 64.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    @Paul in KY: Yea, I take some shit personally.

  65. 65.

    trollhattan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    Regardless of what anybody thinks of Webb, a glance at the ’06 results shows him barely eking a win over Macaca George: 49.6% to 49.2%. Could anytbody else have won? He surely wouldn’t have, had George kept his trap shut that night.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Virginia,_2006

    I haven’t a clue what might keep that seat Democratic–but a lot will have to happen between now and November ’12 to make it even vaguely possible.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Virginia,_2006

  66. 66.

    catclub

    February 9, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    @Elizabelle: Isn’t John Warner about 90 years old?

  67. 67.

    FlipYrWhig

    February 9, 2011 at 12:41 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: New GI Bill and some efforts at prison reform, IIRC.

  68. 68.

    trollhattan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:41 pm

    [apologies for the repeated link–no edit option to delete it. FYWP]

  69. 69.

    matoko_chan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    @stuckinred: of course not. you’re old. it will last your time.

  70. 70.

    IM

    February 9, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    Yes, but if we remember how the senate worked in the last five years and one of his goals was prison reform – can we really blame him?

  71. 71.

    Woodrowfan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    that sucks

  72. 72.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    @matoko_chan: Ha! Just finished my daily mile swim!

  73. 73.

    matoko_chan

    February 9, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    @The Moar You Know: oh yeah.
    link.
    i allus link.

  74. 74.

    Texas Dem

    February 9, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    @stuckinred: There’s a world of difference between a high ranking executive position, where you have a large department to run and the buck basically stops at your desk, and being 1 out of a 100. Especially when antiquated seniority rules mean that you’ll probably have to wait until you’re old and feeble before you can get some real power.

  75. 75.

    FlipYrWhig

    February 9, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    @NobodySpecial:

    Instead, the thinking seems to run like this:
    __
    Step 1: Elect Blue Dog
    Step 2: ???
    Step 3: Elect actual liberal!

    Is that what the thinking is? I thought the thinking was that there are many, many places on the map where the “actual liberal” has no chance in hell at ever being elected. So you push at the leftmost bound the electorate will bear. Sometimes that means a prickly populist like Webb or Tester, which is better than a smiley big-money shill like Baucus or Bayh. But that’s the divide, IMHO: when you’re dealing with trying to elect Democrats in outposts that aren’t amenable to the “actual liberal,” do you opt for the DLC/pro-business kind or the populist kind? Because the Crusading Liberal Of Our Dreams isn’t on the table.

  76. 76.

    rikyrah

    February 9, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    What a punk

  77. 77.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    @Texas Dem: That doesn’t mean he didn’t know what the senate was. You act like he just fell off the turnip truck when he’s been a beltway bandit all along.

  78. 78.

    Town

    February 9, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    The only way George Allen wins the GOP primary is if the Tea Party and the Crazies split the vote, letting him slide in.

    George Allen is the new Jim Gilmore.

    Tim Kaine already won statewide office, as he was the last Democratic governor who left in 2009, so it would not be impossible for him to win again, ESPECIALLY with Obama on the ballot, him being the former mayor of Richmond, being tight with Obama. I think he’d be very popular in the 95/64 crescent which is where most of the Democratic vote and most of the population growth in VA is to begin with.

    Whoever is the Democratic nominee MUST appeal to the people in Northern Virginia, which is the bluest part of the state and the fastest part of the state. Creigh Deeds did NOT appeal to people in NoVa and did NOT appeal to black people and IGNORED people’s advice to him, choosing to run away from Obama and play up his hillbilly roots and he got slammed at the polls. Even NORTHERN BLUE VIRGINIA voted for McDonnell overwhemingly. That’s really sad.

    Webb pissed a lot of black people off claiming that affirmative action was the reason white people were unemployed. Naw, son, that ain’t gonna fly, especially when black unemployment is TWICE that of white unemployment and less than 1% of state contracts goes to black owned businesses. So the black support for him would have been iffy—it would have been more of a “hold your nose” type of situation.

    No more Democratic candidates from Appalachia or Wrong Turn, VA. Get somebody who appeals to Northern Virginia and can turn out the black and hispanic vote and that Senate seat will stay blue.

  79. 79.

    acallidryas

    February 9, 2011 at 12:55 pm

    Webb’s not gonna be my best friend or anything, and he certainly pissed me off about climate change a lot, but I’ve worked with him and his office and I do have some respect for the guy. He’s always struck me as someone who does have some core beliefs, and he and his office have always been very willing to listen to constituents, and receptive to new information. And he’s been a D vote when it counts-he’s no Ben Nelson is what I’m saying. Heck, I kinda like him better than Mark Warner.

    And for those saying he doesn’t do anything, he’s actually been super out-front on prison reform issues, and was trying to raise the visibility of the problems of our prison system. It’s just too bad nobody at all cares.

    Anyway, here’s hoping we can get a stronger Dem in there, but I am sad to see him go. And I’m nervous about Virginia’s chances of staying blue.

  80. 80.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    @acallidryas: Yea, he’s got some core beliefs like the Vietnam War was a noble cause fucked up by the media and pussy politicians and those of us who stood up when we came home owe HIM a fucking apology. Fuck him thrice!

  81. 81.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    Yea, he’s got some core beliefs like the Vietnam War was a noble cause fucked up by the media and pussy politicians and those of us who stood up when we came home owe HIM a fucking apology.

  82. 82.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    fuck your moderation

  83. 83.

    eemom

    February 9, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    Kaine has already said he won’t run.

    This really sucks. I like Jim Webb; I seriously believe he’s a man of principle. That’s why he ran in the first place. And probably why he can’t wait to get the hell out of there.

  84. 84.

    Texas Dem

    February 9, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    @stuckinred: Of course he knew about the Senate, and he probably knew what a mess it was. But you gain far more insight from being inside a decaying institution rather than being on the outside looking in. And then there’s the fact that he was facing a very tough reelection in a state that’s trending red, which would have required raising a hell of a lot of money. Not everyone is cut out for that.

  85. 85.

    kdaug

    February 9, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    @mistermix: Think the phrase is “Perfumed Princes” (h/t Colonel Hackworth, RIP)

  86. 86.

    eemom

    February 9, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    @acallidryas:

    And for those saying he doesn’t do anything, he’s actually been super out-front on prison reform issues, and was trying to raise the visibility of the problems of our prison system. It’s just too bad nobody at all cares.

    Exactly.

    But, you know, Hamsher and Greenwald are fucking heroes because they won’t stop talking about Bradley Manning.

  87. 87.

    Texas Dem

    February 9, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    On the plus side, Webb is a gifted writer and not afraid to step on toes, so the book on his senate career (I’m assuming he’ll probably write one) should be well worth reading.

  88. 88.

    Texas Dem

    February 9, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    @eemom: As much as I hate to add to the level of cynicism around here, no one is going to give a rat’s ass about prison conditions in this county until a hell of a lot more white, Christian, middle class white folks are locked up and experience those hellish conditions for themselves. Or until things get so bad that it starts to affect the country’s international reputation and gets in the way of our imperial foreign policy.

    My experience from practicing law, by the way, was that Republicans tended to turn liberal very quickly when they realized their precious Jane or Johnny was going to be facing an extended stay at the Gladiator Farm, or the Texas Department of Criminal Justice as it’s otherwise known.

  89. 89.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 1:23 pm

    @kdaug: Fuckin A

  90. 90.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    February 9, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    I confess I didn’t know that Webb was working on prison reform, but I still maintain that this does not put him in the pantheon of “great” Senators.

    A lot of this is ideological. Jim Webb is an ex (?) Reagan Republican who ran as a Democrat because he was mad at George W. Bush about Iraq. That’s great, and I wish a lot more people from the right to the Broderist/DLC ‘center’ had been able to look past party labels to call wrong wrong and stupid stupid. The chances that he and I would ever agree on issues like the budget or health care were always pretty small. If I lived in VA, I would’ve voted for Webb next year; in a close race, he might even have managed to get some money from me. But I reserve the right to express my impotent frustration about Blue Dogs on political web sites.

    As someone said upthread, what a lot of progressives overlook or choose to ignore is that Blue Dogs actually believe the things we think are stupid. Dianne Feinstein wasn’t looking to curry favor with anyone when she looked down from her pile of defense-contract-created wealth and worried that extending unemployment benefits would lead to a lazy, discontented rabble instead of a thrifty working class. She’s old, small-minded, socially insulated, incredibly rich and has been told for at least twenty years, by everyone she thinks matters, that she’s a Very Serious Grown Up because she’s always pro-war and pro-taxcut.

  91. 91.

    Triassic Sands

    February 9, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    Another lesser evil throws in the towel.

    @Texas Dem:

    And then there’s the fact that he was facing a very tough reelection in a state that’s trending red,

    Funny, but in 2006 Webb won and then Obama won in Virginia in 2008 and it was supposed to be a sign the state was trending blue. Fickle, fickle, fickle.

  92. 92.

    Sentient Puddle

    February 9, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    The last polling I saw showed Kaine with a rather comfortable lead over Allen and any other potential Republican challengers. As much as I’d love a Senator Perriello, polling for him wasn’t as strong (still very competitive, but Kaine did very noticeably better).

  93. 93.

    eemom

    February 9, 2011 at 1:31 pm

    @Texas Dem:

    no one is going to give a rat’s ass about prison conditions in this county until a hell of a lot more white, Christian, middle class white folks are locked up and experience those hellish conditions for themselves. Or until things get so bad that it starts to affect the country’s international reputation and gets in the way of our imperial foreign policy.

    I agree. In other words, never.

  94. 94.

    WarMunchkin

    February 9, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    I think it may have been this blog(?) that brought up about how Webb became a Democrat because he was sick of the Republican party being beholden to Wall Street, and then when he became a Democrat, he discovered there was no difference.

  95. 95.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    But on the other side of the coin, said Blue Dogs’ fortunes are always going to be inextricably connected to the fortunes of the Democratic Party. This past election kind of proved that point. However, many went out of their way to buck and even campaign against their own party. Which is going far and beyond the usual ‘respectful differences’ in ideology.

    And then you also have assholes like Lieberman, who’ve generally made a career out of blatant undermining of the party for personal political gain.

  96. 96.

    Yutsano

    February 9, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    @Sentient Puddle: Just my preference, but I’d go for new blood over old in this instance. Plus Perriello is a lot like Kaine, so it’d be a pretty good pick regardless. Add in Obama election year and me likes the odds.

  97. 97.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    February 9, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    I should add: I have a lot more respect for someone like Webb, who leaves the GOP in name if not completely in spirt than those like Snowe, Collins, to some extent Lugar and Hagel and even Chaffee, who cling to the party label even when they pretty obviously disagree with (and I suspect despise) what the party has become.

  98. 98.

    Kryptik

    February 9, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    See, my issue isn’t that they cling to the party label. It’s the fact that, when push comes to shove, they rarely vote their conscience, instead joining in to ensure a monolithic GOP bloc.

  99. 99.

    ericblair

    February 9, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    @Town:

    Creigh Deeds did NOT appeal to people in NoVa and did NOT appeal to black people and IGNORED people’s advice to him, choosing to run away from Obama and play up his hillbilly roots and he got slammed at the polls. Even NORTHERN BLUE VIRGINIA voted for McDonnell overwhemingly. That’s really sad.

    Deeds was a Democrat pretending to be a Republican, and McDonnell was a Republican pretending to be a Democrat (at least in NoVa). The fake Democrat won. Then we got him and Cuckoo Cuccinelli. Yay for us.

    I don’t know how things look for 2012; I’m doubtful that off-year 2010 election will have much predictive value. I can tell you that Dems who try to win downstate Virginia by pissing off NoVa don’t stand much of a chance.

  100. 100.

    catclub

    February 9, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: “in the pantheon of “great” Senators”

    I think you misread Elizabelle. She wanted John Warner to come out of retirement and switch to democrat – he was the ‘great’ one. Am I correct Elizabelle?

    I pointed out that Warner appears to be 90 years old. He is actually only 83, but looks 90.

  101. 101.

    Pangloss

    February 9, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    Meanwhile, on the GOP side, Joe Wilson is leading Lindsey Graham in early polling for the 2014 South Carolina GOP primary, according to GOS. Hooray for the Purity decade!

  102. 102.

    eemom

    February 9, 2011 at 1:44 pm

    @Yutsano:

    it’s nice to hear an optimistic perspective. But there are an awful lot of deeply stupid people in this state.

    Even hip northern Virginia ain’t all ponies and unicorns. The further out in the suburbs, the deeper the stoopid.

  103. 103.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    February 9, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    @catclub: D’oh! my apologies to Elizabelle. I actually agree with that. I’ve always suspected that John Warner decided to retire when McCain and Graham pulled the rug out from under him when Warner was trying to stop the Military Commissions Act.

  104. 104.

    James E. Powell

    February 9, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @Dave:

    Sure, they’ll lose hard in the election but at least we can feel good about ourselves.

    It isn’t a matter of left/liberal people feeling good about themselves. Rather, it is a demand that the candidates will make left/liberal arguments, that those arguments will be put forth by people who believe them and intend to govern in accordance with them.

    What we have are members of our party, hell a whole wing of our party, who are reliable allies of our opposition, who are public critics of our party’s mainstream programs and ideals, and who are invited to appear on talking head shows to represent all of use even though they do not represent more than a handful of us.

    We Democrats have been accommodating to the right-wing members of our party for thirty years. More than that, we have had to kiss their rings and promise not to hurt their feelings. How has that worked out?

    I guess at least we can feel that our cynicism is justified.

  105. 105.

    ericblair

    February 9, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    Even hip northern Virginia ain’t all ponies and unicorns. The further out in the suburbs, the deeper the stoopid.

    Yep, it’s pretty much blue-purple-red as you increase in distance from DC. The closer in you get, the more people are from elsewhere moving here for jobs, and the more people feel like they really belong to metro DC and not to Virginia. Moving to Maryland or DC wouldn’t really be much of a change, but moving to somewhere else in VA would be.

    For day-to-day stuff, the federal government as an institution and local governments seem much more important than the state. Virginia to NOVA basically means the car tax and VDOT not clearing the snow and that’s about the end of it.

  106. 106.

    nevsky42

    February 9, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    @Sentient Puddle: I think part of that had to do with Perriello’s lack of name recognition statewide, which he would quickly make up if he were the nominee. He was a tireless campaigner in our district and severely overperformed in VA-5 despite the political climate at the time.

    All the same, Kaine should probably beat Allen handily too. I’m not sure why there’s so much concern about Felix, actually, the Repubs are a whole different beast from six years ago and quite a few teabaggers are going to stay home if he’s the nom.

    And it’s not like he was a particularly impressive Senator who made one horrible gaffe, the Macaca business pretty much underscored what a lightweight he was all along.

  107. 107.

    Elizabelle

    February 9, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    @eemom:

    Hadn’t been following that. Link please — curious if Kaine left wiggle room.

  108. 108.

    Elizabelle

    February 9, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    @catclub:

    Yup, was referring to John Warner as a great senator.

    Only 83? Would have guessed 92! But he’s got moral authority lacking in a lot of present day GOP. John Warner fought back against the Oliver North wing of the Virginia GOP.

  109. 109.

    NickM

    February 9, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    Damn. Although I wasn’t always in agreement with Webb’s votes, he seemed to be a principled man and also seemed to have his eye on the ball (that is, what we can do to buoy the eroding middle class) most of the time. And I agree that we’re probably going to get, if not the odious Sen. Macaca, then someone of that calibre (Sen. Cuccinelli?)

  110. 110.

    Redshift

    February 9, 2011 at 2:07 pm

    Geez, there are a lot of people making declarations about Webb who seem to know nothing about him.

    Webb is a decent legislator. (GI Bill, prison reform, etc., not bad for a freshman senator, contra those who say he “did nothing.”) I like a lot of what he did, and periodically he does something to really piss me off, so I’ll never love him as a senator. But the reason he’s a good senator is that he thinks things over and does what he thinks is right (except when the Scots-Irish obsession gets in the way), and I can respect that even if I don’t agree with him. Congress was a much better place when there were more thoughtful people I could respectfully disagree with.

    He’s not running again because he hates fundraising, campaigning, and glad-handing generally, and always has. He’s a good legislator, but a terrible candidate, and he got lucky last time. If it looked like a shoo-in, he might have run again, but not a hard-fought campaign that would involve spending months doing all the things he hates about being a politician, with a good chance that he still wouldn’t be good enough to win.

    I doubt he’s going to a defense contractor and I’m absolutely certain he’s not going into lobbying (that whole “hates glad-handing”, remember?) An administration position is possible, but not likely, since doesn’t toe the party line and they wouldn’t reward him for bailing on the Dems. He was a successful author before he was a senator; he’s not a career politician who’s looking to cash in. I expect he’ll go back to that.

  111. 111.

    passerby

    February 9, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    @mistermix:

    I’m looking forward to Webb’s account of the jackasses and prima donnas that he had to deal with in the Senate.

    Second this.

    Webb’s a writer. As for his one and done stance, he may have entered the US Senate for all the right reasons–rule of law, unlawful invasion of a sovereign country, belief in diplomacy, support for US Veterans, etc.–but, he found out quickly that personal integrity and honor are not qualities commonly found in the halls of Capitol Hill.

    I’m hoping he’ll write about what a snake-pit it is.

    ETA: And name names.

  112. 112.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    The Wall

    statement by James Webb: “I believe the following modifications must be accomplished: 1. The American flag must be flown in a conspicuous place. . . . 2. In the absence of the artifacts of war, the monument itself must contain a strong inscription denoting the values for which our countrymen fought and died. . . . 3. The memorial should be either raised above ground, or the stone should be changed from black to white. . . . 4.The chronological listing of the names of those who gave their lives must be either modified or abandoned.”

  113. 113.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    February 9, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    from TPM:

    George Allen, notwithstanding the conservative resurgence of the last couple years, isn’t that popular either. PPP had his favorable at 40% and his unfavorable at 41% — […]
    Prior to Webb’s announcement, former Gov. Tim Kaine (D) had said repeatedly that he was not interested in running. However, in PPP’s poll, he polled even better than Webb and was beating Allen by 6 points. And that was back in November. So pretty much at the nadir of Dems’ fortunes.

  114. 114.

    jak

    February 9, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    @Redshift:

    Good comments. That is a description of the Webb I know.

  115. 115.

    Judas Escargot

    February 9, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    @Punchy:

    With his resume (former Sec. Navy) and contacts, Lockheed/Boeing/Raytheon/etc are sure to be keeping seats warm for him (either CEO or Board of Directors).

    If that’s what he wants, that is.

  116. 116.

    rickstersherpa

    February 9, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    That Senator Webb was not Bernie Sanders is not to be disputed, but he has been a solid Democratic Senator who helped get landmark bill for Veterans passed in the Webb GI Bill, a bill that provides more support and assistance to middle class and working people than almost anything Congress has past the last 20 years with the exception of the (yes its imperfect) Affordable Health Care Act. http://www.newgibill.org/ He also supported the imperfect (but still hated by our banking masters)Dodds-Franks Financial Reform Act of 2010. Somehow, I don’t think Bernie Sanders could have gotten elected in Virginia, or West Virginia, or Pennsylvania.

    Maybe in some alternate Universe the Socialist Party did evolve into a great American political party after the 1912 election. Maybe the Progressive Party would have out polled the Democrats in 1912 and put TR into the Presidency, but it did not happen. Most Progressives, with TR drifted back to the Republicans. Then came the Bolshevik Revolution, splitting the Socialist movement into all sorts of splinters and permanently tainting it as the work of foreign devils. And we do a poor job of going around to people who don’t share our opinions and trying to win them over.

  117. 117.

    eemom

    February 9, 2011 at 2:40 pm

    @Redshift:

    yup. Every word of that is true.

    Nice to see that perhaps I’m not the only one around here who objects to people making declarations about matters of which they know nothing.

  118. 118.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    @eemom: Whoop-tee-dooo.

  119. 119.

    catclub

    February 9, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    @stuckinred: “values for which our countrymen fought and died.”

    Protecting the pilonidal cysts on the asses of wealthy Missouri born cowards?

  120. 120.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    @catclub: And Newt,Cheney, and all the rest of those fuckers.

  121. 121.

    eemom

    February 9, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    @stuckinred:

    huh? What crawled up your ass?

  122. 122.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    @eemom: I don’t like the mothefucker and never have and I know plenty about him.

  123. 123.

    eemom

    February 9, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    @stuckinred:

    Does that all relate to Vietnam? What else besides the memorial?

    You aren’t willing to give him credit for having evolved over the years?

    Just asking.

  124. 124.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    @eemom: Yes and nope. 20 years ago when I went to the Wall it was all “we were together then and together now. Some of us protested some of us didn’t”. Then came Bush v Kerry and the shit went right back to way it was in 1968.

    Here’s Webb

    To be sure, Kerry deserves condemnation for his activities as the leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). In the early 1970s, this small organization — never more than 7,000 veterans out of a potential pool of 9 million — became the darling of the anti-war movement and the liberal media. Its activities went far beyond simply criticizing the politics of the war to repeatedly and dishonestly misrepresenting the service of Vietnam veterans and the positive feelings most felt after serving.

    Kerry and his VVAW compatriots portrayed their fellow veterans as unwilling soldiers, morally debased and haunted by their service. While this might have fit a small minority, the most accurate survey, done by the Harris Poll in 1980, showed that 91% of those who went to Vietnam were “glad they served their country,” 74% “enjoyed their time in the military” and 89% agreed with the statement that “our troops were asked to fight in a war which our political leaders in Washington would not let them win.”

    Kerry’s own comments were filled with hyperbolic exaggerations that sought to make egregious acts seem commonplace. During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in 1971, he testified that fellow veterans had routinely “raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan.” With those words, he defamed a generation of honorable men. No matter how he spins it today, at a minimum, he owes them a full and complete apology.

    The view that Kerry remained on the “wrong side” of the war was compounded by his failure to consult with leaders of America’s million-plus Vietnamese community while playing a dominant role in the normalization of relations with communist Vietnam during the early 1990s. Many Vietnamese-Americans believe Kerry has been an apologist for the Hanoi government on such key issues as human rights. Kerry personally has bottled up the Vietnamese Human Rights Act, which twice passed the House by wide majorities, so that it cannot even be debated on the Senate floor.

  125. 125.

    Glen Tomkins

    February 9, 2011 at 3:48 pm

    “The possibility that George Allen might be the next Senator from Virginia just increased greatly.”

    If you start from a low enough probability, I guess even the slightest move in your favor increases your chances greatly. But I wouldn’t concede the truth of the quote in any way but this very modest claim that Allen’s very poor chances just got marginally less poor.

    First he has to get past the teabaggers. Sure, he can always fake right. He even starts from a position of not having to go too far to fake the craziest positions he could be called on in order to win over the baggers. The problem with Allen faking even a little, is that he is a profoundly stupid person.

    I don’t mean by this that he is factually challenged, or that he lacks the curiousity of basic public policy issues that might prompt a remediation of that knowledge deficit, or even that he doesn’t seem very skilled at thinking. He is all three of these things, but so are many quite successful politicians.

    You can overcome, and even turn stupidity to your political advantage, if only you don’t add to it delusions of competence. Allen is probably not as stupid in any of the three categories listed as Reagan. But Reagan recognized his limits and took direction well. Most politicians are not so clear a case as Reagan, being neither as factually and mentally challenged, nor as willing to and skilled at taking direction to compensate. The more usual adaptation involves being very bland and non-committal in all public statements, aside from carefully thought out and rehearsed talking points.

    The most striking thing about the Macaca Moment video is not the stupid insult itself, but the completely unjustified self-confidence with which Allen goes very non-bland and off-the-cuff — in full knowledge that he is being filmed by a Webb tracker. It’s like the Dan Quayle potatoe moment, only about race instead of orthography.

    Allen has too much unjustified self-esteem to pull the ideological maneuvering he would need to do to sell himself to the baggers in the primary, then cut back towards the middle for the general. Allen is going to be much less skilled at doing this without letting his true, ever superior, positions get in the way, than the average only mildly stupid R politician. The Rs would be much better served by putting up a run of the mill, bland hack, and hoping for a bad economy to pull down Obama and the Ds to the point that their guy doesn’t get much scrutiny. Another Reagan would be gravy. But they can’t win with the anti-Reagan, an idiot who is convinced that he’s the smartest guy in any room.

  126. 126.

    Michael

    February 9, 2011 at 3:53 pm

    @eemom:

    huh? What crawled up your ass?

    The sine qua non of 60s identity politics, that being the longlasting war crime otherwise known as Vietnam. The poster to whom you refer is otherwise a decent sort, but mention Vietnam, and one must then genuflect before any self-proclaimed vet (particularly anybody who mentions a connection with the remarkably ineffective VVAW) in advance of fellating him.

  127. 127.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    @Michael: Well pal I was in the VVAW and I disagree with you. You want my 214?

  128. 128.

    4jkb4ia

    February 9, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    In general–
    “Jim Webb is as good as it is going to get in Virginia” might be true if I knew more about whether Perriello was a viable candidate.
    Allen’s chances got better? Sure. He is not running against the incumbent now.

    In specific–
    Webb supported the DREAM Act. This is a matter of one google.

    (John is helping me imnensely today. I’m not mad at him.)

  129. 129.

    Michael

    February 9, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    @stuckinred:

    Well pal I was in the VVAW and I disagree with you. You want my 214?

    Not really. It isn’t that I disbelieve you, its just that I don’t give a shit.

    Frankly, it makes me a little weepy to know that hippies didn’t really spit on soldiers returning from combat in Vietnam. Given all the whining and huge sense of entitlement these past 40 years, I’d have hoped that there would have been at least some little price paid by all you heroes.

  130. 130.

    stuckinred

    February 9, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    If you don’t give a shit why are you running your mouth? You are making no sense. People in the VVAW didn’t whine about being spit on and certainly didn’t project and sense of heroics. We were Against it, that’s what the A stood for.

  131. 131.

    4jkb4ia

    February 9, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    The Swingnuts are excited about Perriello running. He is not really known statewide but he got 47% in a district that is more conservative than the state and he will campaign his butt off.

    Also, (too) we have the following wisdom from DCCyclone, who is in VA-10–

    Sabato tweeted today that so long as Dems nominate a competent candidate, the Democrat will win if Obama wins the state, and lose to Allen if Obama loses the state. Sabato thinks Prez year coattails will be decisive. And he smartly points to 2000, when Allen won only 52% against a badly-damaged Chuck Robb who won in ’94 only because he had Oliver North to run against and never rehabilitated his reputation after beating North.

    And SSP, my completely reliable happy place, is going over to DK4. Great apprehension.

  132. 132.

    acallidryas

    February 9, 2011 at 5:54 pm

    @GlenTomkins (and others, really)

    I’m kind of surprised everyone is just focused on Allen. We have no shortage of crazies who will be happy to fight for that seat–I believe someone already mentioned Cuccinelli,and Corey Stewart, the anti-immigrant Prince William supervisor has been rumored before. Even if Allen can’t sell himself as right enough, we have plenty the Tea Party would be proud of, and who just might be able to pull off a senate run.

    As for Periello, I’m not sure he could win, but I think he could be competitive. I’d agree that if VA is trending blue that year, Periello would win. The seat he had before was very conservative, so he can win in a Republican area, and he’s a strong campaigner–and a strong champion of progressive values. He was selling the health care bill in his district, instead of running from it. I’d like to think he could pull it off.

  133. 133.

    Nerull

    February 9, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    I’m curious what more liberal policies Allen will vote for, and I fail to see how getting him elected will be a progressive victory.

  134. 134.

    Glen Tomkins

    February 9, 2011 at 11:46 pm

    @acallidryas: I spent all my time on Allen because I was answering the particular assumption that John Cole made, “The possibility that George Allen might be the next Senator from Virginia just increased greatly.”.

    I think that Allen is a weak candidate, about the only nationally known VA Senate candidate the Rs could put up who would be a near-certainty to lose. Probably the only reason that, before the Webb withdrawal, he held the field for them, aside from Radtke, was that their side wasn’t thrilled about the prospects of any R candidate taking the seat, so might as well leave it to a vanity run by Macaca. They figured he would lose big and that might finally get him to give up politics. Good riddance.

    Now that Webb has withdrawn, I think the seat is much more competitive. Cole would have been much more correct to say that Webb’s withdrawal makes it more likely that some R will win, but I think that Allen is unlikely to be the beneficiary.

    That enhnaced competitiveness will probably mean that other Rs will come in, both from the bagger and the “moderate” ends of their spectrum. I doubt that Allen will be able to get the nomination if any more serious contenders come into the primary race.

    I don’t have anything I think terribly insightful to say on exactly who these Rs who jump in might be. Both of your suggestions are quite possible.

    The only thing I would add about Cuccinelli, is that he might be uninterested in the Senate, compared to being governor, for the same reason that is, I suspect, Webb’s main reason for quitting. The Senate just isn’t a very hospitable place these days for people with ideas, much less Big Ideas. Not to say that someone with enough of a Messianic bent to entertain Big Ideas might not be able to convince himself that great events were at hand, and being a Senator stands on the verge of transforming into being all about bringing Big Ideas to fruition — but, really. I would think that Cuccinelli is moire likely to imagine that being governor, especially insofa as his side is successful at getting us back to a states’ rights regime in this country, has a lot more possibilities for working dramatic change than being a US Senator.

    As for the Dem side, if the Rs play it safe, and don’t nominate some loser like Allen or an extreme bagger, I suspect that any reasonable Dem could win if the economy picks up, but almost no Dem could win if it doesn’t. I don’t see that any of the possibilities on our side bring any individual advantages or disadvantages to the race that would be strong enough to outweigh that factor of the jobs picture in 2012.

  135. 135.

    Gemina13

    February 10, 2011 at 8:25 am

    Please. George Allen can make a run for Senator, but he didn’t do particularly well last time, and it looks unlikely he’d make a good showing now. Do stop foaming at the mouth over yet another Blue Dog stepping down, and start considering that, with the DLC out of the way, another Democrat might run for and win Webb’s seat.

  136. 136.

    Stan Moody

    February 10, 2011 at 9:16 am

    Hopefully, Jim Webb will continue his crusade for prison reform…

    For articles on Prison Reform, visit http://www.scribd.com/stanmoody

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 3:23am)
  • NotMax on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 3:23am)
  • mrmoshpotato on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 3:22am)
  • Tony Jay on Late Night Open Thread: Ron DeSaster In New Hampshire (Jun 2, 2023 @ 3:20am)
  • mrmoshpotato on Sexy and He Knows It (Jun 2, 2023 @ 3:16am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!