• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

T R E 4 5 O N

I really should read my own blog.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

You cannot shame the shameless.

“woke” is the new caravan.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

This blog will pay for itself.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the GOP

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Nothing worth doing is easy.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

I didn’t have alien invasion on my 2023 BINGO card.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Romney’s Legacy

Romney’s Legacy

by $8 blue check mistermix|  November 11, 20129:40 am| 204 Comments

This post is in: Open Threads

FacebookTweetEmail

Garry Wills’ fairly brutal assessment of Mitt Romney’s future, where he tries, and fails, to find recent campaign loser with as little to offer as Romney, got me thinking about a historical figure marginal enough to compare with Romney. The guy in this (great) photo, Wendell Willkie, Roosevelt’s opponent in 1940, is one possibility. He was a corporate lawyer who hadn’t run for office until he faced Roosevelt in 1940. However, unlike what I expect Romney to do, he joined forces with FDR to promote internationalism and wrote a book about the “one world” movement. Since he died in 1944, at age 52, we don’t know exactly what he would have done had he lived a full life.

Probably a better candidate is poor old Tom Dewey, the governor of a Northeastern state who also thought he was going to win on one of the nights he ran for President. After losing to FDR in ’44 and, more famously, to Truman in 48, Dewey pretty much stayed on the sidelines, turning down a nomination from LBJ for the Supreme Court, and concentrating on making money as a corporate lawyer. I imagine Mitt will follow a similar path.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Early Morning Open Thread: On With the Song
Next Post: Veteran’s Day And Remembrance Day »

Reader Interactions

204Comments

  1. 1.

    Killjoy

    November 11, 2012 at 9:42 am

    Who?

  2. 2.

    JPL

    November 11, 2012 at 9:42 am

    Maybe but without the Supreme Court part..

  3. 3.

    Baud

    November 11, 2012 at 9:44 am

    @Killjoy:

    More like, who cares?

  4. 4.

    WereBear

    November 11, 2012 at 9:44 am

    Has Mitt Romney EVER done anything else but make money?

    While successful at amassing it and not letting anyone else have it, I don’t think he’s particularly good at actually making it appear.

    Heck, I could take over a company, hoover up its assets, and leave the husk on the side of the road. Is this a skilled job?

  5. 5.

    Cermet

    November 11, 2012 at 9:45 am

    Once a Vulture, always a parasite on our country. Parasites never die, they just keep looking for a new host to bleed and suck dry. At leaset we got the pleasure to tell that asswipe – “Your fired!”

    Hey, he’s right, I like doing that to a piece of low life shit like him.

    You’re fired, you’re fired … feels good in the morning.

  6. 6.

    Chris

    November 11, 2012 at 9:47 am

    This reminds me of my American Diplomatic History course at Indiana University (which has a Wilke Hall), with Prof. Joan Hoff (a Nixon biographer) having a socratic back and forth with one of my classmates, who turned out to be Wilke’s grandson.

  7. 7.

    Kirk

    November 11, 2012 at 9:48 am

    Right now I’d call it even odds Romney blames the loss on others and throws his hat in the ring for 2016.

  8. 8.

    SiubhanDuinne

    November 11, 2012 at 9:50 am

    Somewhere among my thousands upon thousands of books, I actually own an autographed copy of “One World.” As I am probably never going to read it, maybe I should find out if anyone would pay cash money for it.

    Retirement project: catalogue personal library and get rid of 90% of dead-tree books. Be ruthless. Seriously, I mean it.

  9. 9.

    PeakVT

    November 11, 2012 at 9:50 am

    I like this borderline non-encyclopedic paragraph from Wikipedia:

    Indeed, given Truman’s sinking popularity and the Democratic Party’s three-way split (between Truman, Henry A. Wallace, and Strom Thurmond), Dewey had seemed unstoppable. Republicans figured that all they had to do to win was to avoid making any major mistakes, and as such Dewey did not take any risks. He spoke in platitudes, trying to transcend politics. Speech after speech was filled with empty statements of the obvious, such as the famous quote: “You know that your future is still ahead of you.”

    The hubris feels familiar.

  10. 10.

    RoonieRoo

    November 11, 2012 at 9:50 am

    I think the more interesting question, now that Romney slides off stage right, is “who is the leader of the Republican party?”

  11. 11.

    brettvk

    November 11, 2012 at 9:51 am

    I really don’t expect Mitt to do anything with his wealth and legacy that enriches anybody outside of his family or the LDS. He could get lots of props inside the Mormon hierarchy for a relatively small investment, and maybe that will be really satisfying to him, since it seem he’s comfortable with hermetically-sealed bubbles. And he may owe the church some back tithes if he’s finagled his taxes — he’d probably come clean to the prophet before he’d stop cheating his fellow citizens.

    I don’t think Mitt is stupid. I think he’d like to have a legacy as the sort of international statesman that Jimmy Carter has made himself, but I don’t think he could possibly force himself to be that generous. Even if he gets his own planet when he dies, he seems to think he can take the Bain cash with him to furnish it.

  12. 12.

    WereBear

    November 11, 2012 at 9:52 am

    @RoonieRoo: Heck, when that question has come up in the past, hasn’t it always been Limbaugh?

  13. 13.

    El Cid

    November 11, 2012 at 9:53 am

    Romney attempted a leveraged buyout of the U.S. government, looking forward to pocketing lots of fees and commissions and using its assets and revenues to pay off his backers with interest.

    In the end, the U.S. rejected the offer.

  14. 14.

    aretino

    November 11, 2012 at 9:53 am

    I doubt that Romney will be as memorably mocked as Wendell Willkie, whom Harold Ickes called “a simple, barefoot Wall Street lawyer.”

  15. 15.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    November 11, 2012 at 9:53 am

    @Killjoy: @Baud: Yup. Willard will fade from even our memories faster than Dukakis. No disrespect to him, but I bet your average voter would have to stop and think when it was MD ran, and against whom. My other prediction, four years from now, having flamed out early in the GOP primaries, Paul Ryan will resign from Congress to take Palin’s place as Fox News concern troll, if Palin, who looked pretty haggard on Tuesday night, lasts that long.

  16. 16.

    dan

    November 11, 2012 at 9:54 am

    A man who did nothing but serve his own ambition his entire life is not going to turn suddenly to serving others.

  17. 17.

    fourmorewars

    November 11, 2012 at 9:54 am

    Thought you’d get a kick out of this. On a rw facebook page called, w/o a trace of irony, ‘Uber-American,’ one of the fan posts states breathlessly that 17 states have petitioned to succeed (sic) from the U.S. No, that’s not the funny part. The funny part is the page moderator’s reply: “If this is real, then why isn’t it on Drudge?”

  18. 18.

    Craigo

    November 11, 2012 at 9:55 am

    Tom Dewey didn’t stay on the sidelines long – he drafted Eisenhower in 1952 specifically to kneecap frontunner Bob Taft (of Taft-Hartley infamy). Since there was essentially no way the GOP wasn’t winning in 1952, we should at least thank him for that.

  19. 19.

    Zifnab25

    November 11, 2012 at 9:55 am

    @Kirk: That’s not how the GOP works. He had his turn. Now he’s done.

    Maybe Tag will get a shot at the big time in 20 years or so, but for now I think Romney’s on the fast track to loserdom obscurity.

  20. 20.

    JGabriel

    November 11, 2012 at 9:57 am

    __
    __
    mistermiix @ top:

    Garry Wills’ fairly brutal assessment of Mitt Romney’s future, where he tries, and fails, to find recent campaign loser with as little to offer as Romney …

    That’s because Willis is looking in the wrong place. If he wants to find GOP candidates with as little to offer as Romney, then he shouldn’t be looking at the campaign losers. Instead, he should be looking at the GOP winners (c.f., Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Reagan, Bush II).

    .

  21. 21.

    WereBear

    November 11, 2012 at 9:57 am

    I see Romney as someone who has always cheated his way into achievement. His whole life seems to have been led under pressure to perform; if it’s true that he was supposed to be the fulfillment of the White Horse Prophecy, it would certainly explain his actions and statements.

    The constant drumbeat of “To make wonderful things happen, Mitt just has to show up!” was an article of faith in his campaign from the beginning.

    He’s expected to be a successful businessman, so he gets ahold of money. He’s expected to get at least one office under his belt before the Presidency, so he gets to be Governor of Massachusetts. He’s expected to be a husband and father, so he gets married at the usual time and has five kids.

    Done! There is never a whisper of what Romney really wants. Does he have a soul in there, somehow? I’ve never seen anyone so hollow.

  22. 22.

    MattF

    November 11, 2012 at 9:58 am

    The pundits who had something positive to say about Romney (e.g., Brooks, Parker) all did the ‘if only Mitt acted in public the way he does in private’ segue– without, somehow, realizing that there’s a huge problem with that line of reasoning.

  23. 23.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    November 11, 2012 at 10:00 am

    @Zifnab25: ah yes, the other good part of this election: Without “son of president” on their resume, the only place the Mittlets can have that political career at least two of them (Tagg and Josh, IIRC) are said to want is Utah, where the Romneys are neither that special (the True White Horse would not place) nor I believe, that popular. Willard owed no small part of his career to being the son of a man widely admired. Running to avenge the failure of someone no one liked is a poor way to start. /gloaty gloaty gloat gloat

    edited

  24. 24.

    PeakVT

    November 11, 2012 at 10:02 am

    Romney’s done. He’s never been a networker or activist among the Republican elite. It’s always been all about Mitt, and now that he’s discovered the whole country doesn’t like him, he’s going to take the millions he never put into this contest and go home to one of his mansions.

  25. 25.

    NCSteve

    November 11, 2012 at 10:02 am

    The more you look at Dewey, the more perfect the comparison to Romney. Wealthy, corporate attorney, former governor of a liberal state. This is from his Wikipedia article about the 1948 campaign:

    Indeed, given Truman’s sinking popularity and the Democratic Party’s three-way split (between Truman, Henry A. Wallace, and Strom Thurmond), Dewey had seemed unstoppable. Republicans figured that all they had to do to win was to avoid making any major mistakes, and as such Dewey did not take any risks. He spoke in platitudes, trying to transcend politics. Speech after speech was filled with empty statements of the obvious, such as the famous quote: “You know that your future is still ahead of you.”

    An editorial in the Louisville Courier-Journal summed it up:
    No presidential candidate in the future will be so inept that four of his major speeches can be boiled down to these historic four sentences: Agriculture is important. Our rivers are full of fish. You cannot have freedom without liberty. Our future lies ahead.

  26. 26.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    November 11, 2012 at 10:02 am

    @RoonieRoo: It’s still Rush Limbaugh.

    They may want to change that. Whether they will is not as clear as many people think.

    I still hear a lot of them talking about their big sweep in 2010, so you know, win some lose some, not realizing that it was just a gerrymandered illusion. As hard as it is to imagine, it might actually take a few more losses for them before it really changes.

  27. 27.

    Kirk

    November 11, 2012 at 10:03 am

    @SiubhanDuinne: If you mean it, start with a simple but painful trick. If you have used (read or referenced) a book more than once in the last three years, keep it. If you have had the book less than three years you can keep it for now unless you know you won’t read or reference over the next year.

    “I might need it someday” does not count.

    You are allowed slack for things with personal significance – some autographs, Th Book that you shared with a loved one, that sort of thing.

    It works. Hurts, but works.

  28. 28.

    Kirk

    November 11, 2012 at 10:05 am

    @Zifnab25: I didn’t say he’d win. I said he may not have faced reality. If he does it will be brutal (the ridicule), but Instill think it even odds right now.

  29. 29.

    PurpleGirl

    November 11, 2012 at 10:07 am

    @RoonieRoo: Was Romney ever the “leader” of the Republican Party? Didn’t they have a multiplicity of pundit/entertainer voices telling people what to believe? Did he really explain policies he wanted to enact or guiding principle that were steady and consistent?

  30. 30.

    gelfling545

    November 11, 2012 at 10:07 am

    @SiubhanDuinne: That was one of my retirement projects, too. Retired in 06; library still the same

  31. 31.

    Cacti

    November 11, 2012 at 10:08 am

    I think he’ll probably get some sort of sinecure from the Mormon church.

  32. 32.

    JGabriel

    November 11, 2012 at 10:09 am

    __
    __
    WereBear:

    Does he have a soul in there, somehow? I’ve never seen anyone so hollow.

    That’s such an unfair characterization. I’m sure Romney’s innards are just filled with circuitry and pistons.

    .

  33. 33.

    Enhanced Voting techniques

    November 11, 2012 at 10:10 am

    After reading about the utter delusion Mittens ran his campaign under I suspect Severely Elder Statesman Romney is going to be a laugh to watch. My bet is Romney is going to attempt to act like he is an ex-president; write a book, set up a library and foundations, attempt to give advice to upcoming Republicans. I don’t see a slot on Faux news for him, beneath the Romney dignity and all that.

    But figure, Romney has never, ever seen the responsibilities of public office, just the privileges.

  34. 34.

    hueyplong

    November 11, 2012 at 10:11 am

    I don’t care for the analogies in the original post. Those people (Dewey, Willkie) actually did things on the party or international stage and influenced events in some way, even if only in the short term.

    As early as Wednesday morning, Romney became an unperson to Republicans, Democrats and Americans in general. I’d be surprised if he had a single additional moment of political relevance in his life. It’s difficult even to imagine the subject on which he’d be asked a question by anyone with a microphone.

    The analogy is to current ex-president and unperson George W. Bush, and the difference is that Bush actually did something in terms of presidential activity upon which comment might be made. Romney didn’t.

    Romney long ago repudiated the only thing he ever did (Romneycare) that will have any lasting effect of any kind on the country. It’s possible that future generations will struggle to remember just who it was who lost to Obama in 2012.

    Whether Romney lives to be 100 or dies today, his future political “impact” will be the same. Zero.

  35. 35.

    Brother Shotgun of Sweet Reason

    November 11, 2012 at 10:11 am

    @Kirk: So, all those boxes of books that I haven’t unpacked since we moved here in 2003? You’re saying I don’t need to keep them?

    Perish the thought. I’ll be setting up some more bookshelves Real Soon Now.

  36. 36.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 10:11 am

    I want to start a fund to have a monument put up to Willard – it really is the Epitaph for the entire GOP – its from the linked column:

    What can be worse than to sell your soul and find it not valuable enough to get anything for it?

  37. 37.

    kay

    November 11, 2012 at 10:13 am

    That’s what I don’t understand about the mainstream pundit excuses for Romney’s cowardice.
    What makes him terrible is not his positions (no one knows what they are) it’s that he wanted to be President yet couldn’t stand up for ANYTHING. We saw it again and again and again. Mitt Romney stood there while a GOP debate audience savaged the gay soldier. He passed on Rush Limbaugh’s disgusting attacks on a private citizen. It happened over and over and over. This is a character issue. It can’t be ignored or papered over with ” he’s really a moderate” or “he’s really a good Guy”
    He’s a good Guy when it’s easy and doesn’t carry any risk. Anyone can be that person. That’s a REALLY low bar.

  38. 38.

    General Stuck

    November 11, 2012 at 10:15 am

    In five years, Romney will be eligible for the Circus Clown Hall of Fame.

  39. 39.

    Robin G.

    November 11, 2012 at 10:16 am

    @brettvk: Agreed. I think he’ll devote himself to the LDS from here on out, which seems to be where his heart (three sizes too small though it is) lies. And he’ll keep growing hos fortune through that time honored tradition of moving it from one bank account to another as interest rates apply.

    I don’t think we’ve heard the last of the Mittlets, though. I see a run for US Senate in Utah in the future for at least one or two of them.

  40. 40.

    JGabriel

    November 11, 2012 at 10:16 am

    Wikipedia via NCSteve:

    An editorial in the Louisville Courier-Journal summed it up:
    No presidential candidate in the future will be so inept that four of his major speeches can be boiled down to these historic four sentences: Agriculture is important. Our rivers are full of fish. You cannot have freedom without liberty. Our future lies ahead.

    That editorial was wrong. I give you their future, with an even more inept president:
    “I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.”

    .

  41. 41.

    Davis X. Machina

    November 11, 2012 at 10:16 am

    @WereBear:

    Has Mitt Romney EVER done anything else but make money?

    You mean “Has Mitt Romney EVER done anything else but accumulate virtue?”

    This is, after all, still America.

  42. 42.

    Alex S.

    November 11, 2012 at 10:16 am

    Romney is old. He’ll retire and let his portfolio do the work. Politically, he leaves nothing behind.

  43. 43.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 10:17 am

    I read Trumans biography years ago and his comments on Herbert Hoover were eye opening. There was a man run out of office in disgrace, charged with running the country into the ditch, a fool and a bungler.

    But HST knew he was a man with bad friends (It was the GOP after all) who was a hard worker and a decent human being. Truman tapped him to run the recovery effort in Europe after the war an he did a tremendous job.

    That sort of future is impossible to imagine for Hoovers modern equivalent (W) or this fop, Willard Marquise du Mittens, Rmoney

  44. 44.

    RoonieRoo

    November 11, 2012 at 10:17 am

    While it is pretty funny and scary that Limbaugh is a leader of the party in some respects, he really isn’t. Romney was the leader while he was the nominee, weak though he was.

    Wouldn’t Boehner be considered the highest ranking in the government right now?

  45. 45.

    dr. bloor

    November 11, 2012 at 10:18 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim:

    I still hear a lot of them talking about their big sweep in 2010, so you know, win some lose some, not realizing that it was just a gerrymandered illusion. As hard as it is to imagine, it might actually take a few more losses for them before it really changes.

    Although the gerrymandering has created a situation that isn’t entirely illusory. They held tight to the House this cycle despite losing the aggregate popular vote in House races, and it’s going to take an act of FSM or well-placed tactical nukes to get them out of the majority there.

    I’d hope for some real reform in elections, like proportional voting, before I’d expect the neanderthals to see the light. That, or we’re just going to have to wait for “demographics” to do their magic.

  46. 46.

    Cacti

    November 11, 2012 at 10:18 am

    @kay:

    What makes him terrible is not his positions (no one knows what they are) it’s that he wanted to be President yet couldn’t stand up for ANYTHING.

    Mitt’s vision for the Presidency started and stopped with: “Willard M. Romney, 45th President of the United States”.

    He deserved the title. Everything beyond that was an afterthought.

  47. 47.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    November 11, 2012 at 10:20 am

    @[email protected]Enhanced Voting techniques: I think this is close. The acting like an ex-President part definitely, similar to how pathetic loser John McCain lectures Obama now at every opportunity.

    Romney presented this oddly bland, even sort of goofy personality during the most of the campaign, but during that first debate his asshole boss side really came out. You could just see him badgering some CEO of a small company that Bain had just bought: “So do you know exactly how many people you need to fire to bring the balance sheet in line? Do you? Do you? I’m asking you if you know that, do you? Give me a figure. Do you know it? No, you don’t.”

    Any images of him slinking away humiliated and subdued doesn’t fit the real Romney personality.

  48. 48.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 10:22 am

    @RoonieRoo:

    They all bow before The great Rush Limbaugh!

    Notice that any gooper who publicly rebukes the one true Lamebrain is forced to grovel before his greatness and beg forgiveness.

  49. 49.

    WereBear

    November 11, 2012 at 10:22 am

    @kay: Romney reminds me of a dog who has been trained to do some complicated trick; they do their thing and get a treat.

    The whys and hows don’t enter into it.

  50. 50.

    IowaOldLady

    November 11, 2012 at 10:23 am

    Mr. IowaOldLady is watching his tivo of Fox Sunday. You’ll be surprised to learn that the only important political event of this week was the resignation of Petraeus, which apparently is directly related to Benghazi. I had to shut the door so I wouldn’t hear it.

  51. 51.

    Cacti

    November 11, 2012 at 10:23 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim:

    Romney presented this oddly bland, even sort of goofy personality during the most of the campaign, but during that first debate his asshole boss side really came out. You could just see him badgering some CEO of a small company that Bain had just bought: “So do you know exactly how many people you need to fire to bring the balance sheet in line? Do you? Do you? I’m asking you if you know that, do you? Give me a figure. Do you know it? No, you don’t.”

    I imagine Mitt in a professional setting to be something like this.

  52. 52.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    November 11, 2012 at 10:24 am

    @RoonieRoo: I think boss Norquist is the leader, despite some concern about his Muslim wife.

  53. 53.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    November 11, 2012 at 10:25 am

    @dr. bloor: No it wasn’t illusory in that sense but it was in the sense that they think it was demographics that got them there instead of gerrymandering. I have read that the demographics will overtake even the redistricting, but when is the question.

    They got a sugar rush and think that it was real nourishment, in other words. With a lot of damage to the rest of us along the way, to be sure.

  54. 54.

    Enhanced Voting techniques

    November 11, 2012 at 10:25 am

    @Schlemizel: Hoover was a good candidate for that because he successfully ran the recovery for Europe, disaster relief in the US in the ’20s and famine relief in the Ukrainian during the great famine there. The reason Hoover is so reviled is because, of any president this country has ever had, he was the best equipped to deal with the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl. Instead, he sat on his hands because he bought into the bootstraps bullshit.

  55. 55.

    kay

    November 11, 2012 at 10:25 am

    @Cacti:

    To me, reading Kathleen Parker, she may as well say “Mitt Romney would be a good President if he were a completely different person”

    Well, YEAH, I guess so. I got news for her. That was a long run. Years and years. We KNOW what he is. There isn’t some better more honorable Romney. He’s in his sixties. We would have seen it by now.

  56. 56.

    hueyplong

    November 11, 2012 at 10:26 am

    RoonieRoo, I think you describe the GOP as it should have been but was not. I don’t think it’s either funny or merely witty to call Rush Limbaugh the leader of the GOP. Unless and until he savages one of his own and that guy does not either conform his behavior accordingly or flat out apologize in public, Rush Limbaugh is in the hunt to be called the de facto leader of the Republican Party.

    It’s not altogether improper to call the right wing media the leader of the party. They drive the “factual” world upon which party action is taken, and we’re only now seeing that do something other than work for them electorally.

    If I had to pick an actual holder of public office, I’d go with McConnell. Boehner’s every move seems calculated to keep Cantor’s shiv from penetrating his back, so it’s hard to call a guy acting so reactively the party’s leader.

  57. 57.

    dmsilev

    November 11, 2012 at 10:26 am

    To me, the more interesting question is what will Paul Ryan do having been given a temporary national stage.

    I suppose he could run for President in 2016, though the odds are against it working out for him; out of curiosity, I went back through the last 100 years worth of elections. There are only three losing VP candidates who went on to get the nomination in a future cycle: FDR, Bob Dole, and Walter Mondale. Two of those lost in the general.

  58. 58.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @Or something like that.Suffern Ace:

    Muslim wife you say? Hmmmmmmmm, doesn’t Sharia prohibit taxation as immoral?

    Damn I wish I could start that rumor & make it fly – wingnut head exploding all across the country!

  59. 59.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    November 11, 2012 at 10:29 am

    @hueyplong: The closest is probably Dukakkis. have you ever heard of an elected official turning to Dukakkis? Has he ever been even asked to play party gadfly?

  60. 60.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    November 11, 2012 at 10:30 am

    @Bill E Pilgrim: I haven’t the slightest idea how the @cacti part got in there, morning stumblefingers. Was a reply to EVT.

  61. 61.

    Alex S.

    November 11, 2012 at 10:31 am

    @RoonieRoo:

    I would agree that it’s probably Boehner right now. He is the last man standing. Though it’s probably Jeb’s party if he wants it.
    I’d like to know how the Supreme Court judges influence the parties. The highest ranking republican in general is Justice Roberts, after all (and Ben Bernanke, but he doesn’t matter).

  62. 62.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    November 11, 2012 at 10:32 am

    @IowaOldLady: What kind of screens or shields was it Captain Kirk used to call on Mr Sulu to put up, that would get Scottie yelling “She can’t hold, captain!”? In my mind’s eye, I see Britt Hume yelling to Brett Baier and Megan Kelly “Close the episteme! Seal it off!”

    Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, said Saturday an F.B.I. employee whom his staff described as a whistle-blower told him about Mr. Petraeus’s affair and a possible security breach in late October, which was after the investigation had begun.
    “I was contacted by an F.B.I. employee concerned that sensitive, classified information may have been compromised and made certain Director Mueller was aware of these serious allegations and the potential risk to our national security,” Mr. Cantor said in a statement.

    From the NYT

  63. 63.

    PurpleGirl

    November 11, 2012 at 10:32 am

    New York named a major roadway (the Thruway) for Gov. Dewey.

    Will Massachusetts ever name anything for Romney?

  64. 64.

    jurassicpork

    November 11, 2012 at 10:33 am

    Well, at least liberals can engage in the schadenfreude over the fact that poor Mitt will have to slink back to his quarter billion dollar fortune and five mansions.

    I can’t stand listening to the bellyaching from right wing nut jobs who keep insisting that Christie, Sandy, Democrat voter suppression, etc. are responsible for Obama’s “squeaker” of a win. Hence, my open letter to them, Democracy Isn’t For Wimps.

  65. 65.

    different-church-lady

    November 11, 2012 at 10:34 am

    Well, the two examples you cited apparently had enough to offer that the presidents who vanquished them offered them roles. What could Romney do for Obama? Be ambassador to the Cayman Islands?

  66. 66.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 10:34 am

    @PurpleGirl:

    An outhouse at the roadside rest on the Mass Turnpike, it will be the one with no paper in the stalls

  67. 67.

    Davis X. Machina

    November 11, 2012 at 10:35 am

    @Or something like that.Suffern Ace: You have to take the long view: Teaching is the best revenge…

  68. 68.

    kay

    November 11, 2012 at 10:35 am

    @WereBear:

    That’s what amazed me about that slick, expensive biographical film they put out. That was THE BEST of Mitt Romney. He’s nice to his family and people he knows, likes and (mostly) shares a religion with. All of that IS EASY. It’s the bare minimum.

  69. 69.

    PurpleGirl

    November 11, 2012 at 10:37 am

    @Schlemizel: More importantly, it frowns on things like interest. The Old Testament also frowns on interest, or as it would say “making money off of a dead thing (money is not a living entity)”.

  70. 70.

    Fluke bucket

    November 11, 2012 at 10:37 am

    @Alex S.: retire from what? The only thing that has ever worked for him is his portfolio.

  71. 71.

    gf120581

    November 11, 2012 at 10:38 am

    @dmsilev: Yeah, I don’t put much stock in the “Paul Ryan is a presidential contender” talk. You only have to look at Sarah Palin to see how ridiculous that is.

    Even those three examples you bring up don’t work. FDR and Bob Dole didn’t get the nomination until a long time after they’d run (12 years for FDR, 20 years for Dole) and when they were known respectively as the popular Governor of New York and the Senate Majority Leader than as failed running mates. And Walter Mondale was an actual former Veep, not just a running mate.

    No, in my view, Ryan is as irrelevant now as his former boss Jack Kemp was after 1996. The only difference is that he still has his House seat, but I wonder if he may get bored with that and quit for Fox News.

  72. 72.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    November 11, 2012 at 10:40 am

    @dan: A man who did nothing but serve his own ambition his entire life is not going to turn suddenly to serving others.

    Oh, I dunno.

  73. 73.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    November 11, 2012 at 10:41 am

    @RoonieRoo: I’d say Boehner is the highest ranking elected Republican right now, officially and in fact, especially if Reid manages to get through some filibuster reform. I gather no one’s even talking about getting rid of it entirely, which I’m ambivalent about, but they want to re-instate the ‘talking filibuster’, and you have to filibuster an actual bill, you can’t block debate on it, which I think is good.
    I believe the rule now is you have to get sixty votes to overcome a filibuster. I’d like to see that changed to needing forty votes to create one. No more hiding behind abstentions, no more “Democrats failed to overcome…”, rather “Republicans voted to block Law X or Nominee Y”

    But I think because what Boehner, who knows he’s risen as high as he’s going to, fears above all else is revolt from the Cantor-Ryan wing of his own caucus, I suspect he fears Limbaugh, and O’Reilly, and Norquist, and Vigeurie, and Robertson. If he had the guts to lose, he’d be pretty powerful for a week or two.

  74. 74.

    jeffreyw

    November 11, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @fourmorewars: I, for one, take great pleasure in living in one of the succeeding States. I was not thinking about petitioning for recognition, though. All part of “a life lived well is the best revenge” mind set – Not one to toot my own horn, & etc.

  75. 75.

    IowaOldLady

    November 11, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @gf120581: I think you’re right about Ryan. House members are often not prepared for electoral battle beyond the local level. Ryan’s inexperience with the national press showed.

  76. 76.

    RoonieRoo

    November 11, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @hueyplong: McConnel is certainly stronger than Boehner. Do you think it matters that most negotiating will have to occur with Boehner since the house will be the choke point? I’m also curious if Cantor is going to be shiving Boehner or if he will back down.

    I do get what you are saying about Limbaugh. Where he definitely has great influence over the party and there policy, that does not make him the leader of the party.

  77. 77.

    Cacti

    November 11, 2012 at 10:43 am

    @gf120581:

    No, in my view, Ryan is as irrelevant now as his former boss Jack Kemp was after 1996. The only difference is that he still has his House seat, but I wonder if he may get bored with that and quit for Fox News.

    Ryan has also never shown that he can win an election in anything larger than a Congressional District. He couldn’t swing Wisconsin in Mitt’s direction in a national election.

    He’s done as a national contender. His future is in wresting away Newt’s title of “dumb person’s idea of a smart person” on the grift circuit.

  78. 78.

    Cacti

    November 11, 2012 at 10:45 am

    @Xecky Gilchrist:

    Oh, I dunno.

    I imagine Melinda leaned pretty hard on Bill for the philanthropy.

    Does anyone see Queen Ann wanting Mitt to give up a cent to “you people”?

  79. 79.

    Poopyman

    November 11, 2012 at 10:46 am

    @PurpleGirl: A public hospital, if there’s any ironic justice in the world.

  80. 80.

    RoonieRoo

    November 11, 2012 at 10:46 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: Okay, I was thinking Boehner was technically highest ranking. Thanks.

    Not sure why this has peaked my interest. I think it is because I think an internal battle in the party is coming and I might want to have my popcorn ready.

  81. 81.

    NotMax

    November 11, 2012 at 10:47 am

    (best George Takei imitation) Oh, my.

    Conservative Weekly Standard columnist Bill Kirstol said it won’t kill the country to raise taxes on millionaires during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday.” Kristol said that after a bad night on Election Day, Republicans should reassess their positions and be open to new ideas.
    __
    “Don’t scream and yell when one person says, ‘you know what, it won’t kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires.’ It really won’t, I don’t think,” Kristol said.  Source

    A small corner of Hell offers ice skating.

  82. 82.

    dmsilev

    November 11, 2012 at 10:48 am

    @gf120581: Yeah, that was sort of the take-away lesson of the history. ‘Failed VP candidate’ is in and of itself not a highway to the nomination. It’s often a highway to a humiliating failure in the primaries though (c.f. Joe Lieberman finishing in a “three way tie for third place”, aka “fifth”, in the 2004 NH primary).

  83. 83.

    Brachiator

    November 11, 2012 at 10:53 am

    @mistermix:

    Dewey pretty much stayed on the sidelines, turning down a nomination from LBJ for the Supreme Court, and concentrating on making money as a corporate lawyer. I imagine Mitt will follow a similar path.

    Uh, Romney has spent much of his life making money. That’s the path he has long been on. Running for president was a nice little hobby for him.

    If you only meant that Romney will retire from politics, I agree. And he doesn’t have the brains to be on the Supreme Court.

    Also, Romney is kinda old, despite all appearances. If the Republicans find a way to win in 2016, I could see Romney being offered a job as ambassador to Mexico, France or Great Britain, but that’s about it for him.

    ETA: anybody going to watch the Sunday news shows? I imagine that the Fox show will be a funeral, with voodoo denialism used like magic to try to reanimate the rotting corpse of Republican defeat.

  84. 84.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    November 11, 2012 at 10:54 am

    @NotMax: Oh Christ. If he were a Sicilian, I’d be worried. His Predictions are always wrong….so is he saying that knowing that someone would take that advice and poison us all? Where is the poison glass?

  85. 85.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 11, 2012 at 10:54 am

    @WereBear:

    Which is one of their very serious problems. Limbaugh knows nothing, nothing about the nuts and bolts of policy. He’s a pure bullshitter, and his bullshit damages his brand, it doesn’t help it.

  86. 86.

    Kirbster

    November 11, 2012 at 10:55 am

    I predict a board of directors slot at Marriott International for the Mittster.

  87. 87.

    Bago

    November 11, 2012 at 10:55 am

    @PeakVT: building a better tomorrow, tomorrow?

  88. 88.

    Brachiator

    November 11, 2012 at 10:57 am

    @Cacti:

    Does anyone see Queen Ann wanting Mitt to give up a cent to “you people”?

    The Romneys used to support Planned Parenthood. I always wondered if politically moderate philanthropy was hidden away in those unseen tax returns.

  89. 89.

    Lojasmo

    November 11, 2012 at 10:58 am

    @PeakVT:

    discovered the whole country doesn’t like him

    Seems he might end up with 47% of the vote. Irony.

  90. 90.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    November 11, 2012 at 10:58 am

    @Cacti: Does anyone see Queen Ann wanting Mitt to give up a cent to “you people”?

    Good point. I was just gobsmacked when Bill Gates showed he could be talked into doing anything at all other than scorched-earth destruction of everything Not Windows.

  91. 91.

    MikeBoyScout

    November 11, 2012 at 11:00 am

    Let’s be clear. There is one thing, and maybe only one thing, most Republicans and Democrats can agree upon in early November 2012; The Romney Legacy is a legacy of EPIC FAIL.

    Good riddance to bad rubbish.

  92. 92.

    Soylent Green is FReepers

    November 11, 2012 at 11:03 am

    Has anybody else noticed that at RedState lately every time they use the word “majority” it’s in quotes? As in:

    This is, of course, despite the fact that Obama’s ‘majority’ of the popular vote (as of the one of the most recent tallies) consists of 50.5% who voted for him versus 47.9% who voted against him nationwide.

    and

    Well, actually, Mr. President, 47.9 percent don’t agree with your approach. However, because a “majority” voted for you…

    Seriously, if 50%+1 isn’t a “majority” in your “dictionary” then maybe you aren’t “in touch” with “reality.”

  93. 93.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    November 11, 2012 at 11:05 am

    @Soylent Green is FReepers: Has anybody else noticed that at RedState lately every time they use the word “majority” it’s in quotes?

    Interesting. Those look to me like snot quotes, which mean that the text enclosed is to be read in the most annoying, spoiled-brat nasal whine you can muster. They don’t necessarily mean that the writer disagrees with whatever’s enclosed, just thinks it should be dragged behind a truck or something like that.

    Hard to say, with people whose thought processes and composition skills are so sewage-bemurked.

  94. 94.

    JPL

    November 11, 2012 at 11:05 am

    @NotMax: Wonder if he’d accept a flat tax of 28 percent on earned and unearned income for millionaires…
    See I can lower the top rate..

  95. 95.

    bemused

    November 11, 2012 at 11:07 am

    @IowaOldLady:

    Is MrIOL a Fox fan or does he tivo it for amusement?

  96. 96.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    November 11, 2012 at 11:07 am

    @Soylent Green is FReepers: As if the bushes were known for reaching across the aisle.

  97. 97.

    aimai

    November 11, 2012 at 11:09 am

    @brettvk:

    I think he will either 1) retire or 2) move back to Utah and run for governor and then for one of the top jobs within the Mormon Church (to the extent that you can run for that). I think he needs to retrench, emotionally, and mere money isn’t going to do it for him. But I also think that he may have fatally blotted his copy book with his Mormon comperes because of everythign that came out, at the last minute, about how he used his CRUT to basically grift off the Mormon Church. I am really, really, sure that although the Church hierarchy knew he wasn’t really tithing ten percent to them (for pete’s sake) the rest of the body of the church and lower level mormons were completely unaware of the special dispensation for important people–just like the rank and file scientologists are unaware that the celebrity scientologists get special treatment.

    aimai

  98. 98.

    dmsilev

    November 11, 2012 at 11:09 am

    @Soylent Green is FReepers: Their temper tantrum is kind of cute. Still, if it keeps going we’re going to have to send them to their room for a bit of a time out.

  99. 99.

    IowaOldLady

    November 11, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @bemused</[email protected]bemused:

    Is MrIOL a Fox fan or does he tivo it for amusement?

    Amusement. He laughs at way more things than I do, which is why he dragged me to the Roller Derby last night.

  100. 100.

    Brachiator

    November 11, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @Soylent Green is FReepers:

    Well, actually, Mr. President, 47.9 percent don’t agree with your approach. However, because a “majority” voted for you…

    Did these clowns ever write anything similar about Dubya?

    Oh, well.

  101. 101.

    NotMax

    November 11, 2012 at 11:11 am

    @jurassicpork

    Speaking of schadenfreude:

    Quoted from concession speech given in the name of your publicly supported candidate.

    “Sacramento will be destroyed” by disasters of Nature next year.

    “Right now,” we are in the “coldest winter in human history.”

    Build “a million solar-powered houses in each state.” (ed. – Quite the bonanza for the 7 states (and D.C. as the 8th area with EVs) whose entire population is less than a million.)

    “Will be calling President Obama to offer “congratulations” and “our condolences.”

    Obama has “won a job he is unqualified to do.”

  102. 102.

    Bago

    November 11, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @Cacti: I doubt the impetus was that. I would like to think of it as a Carnegie moment. You’ve won, you have the high score, and you’re going to die soon. What kind of memory do you want the world to have of you after your organs fail?

  103. 103.

    Uncle Cosmo

    November 11, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @Craigo:

    om Dewey… drafted Eisenhower in 1952 specifically to kneecap frontunner Bob Taft (of Taft-Hartley infamy). Since there was essentially no way the GOP wasn’t winning in 1952, we should at least thank him for that.

    Well, things might’ve been pretty interesting if he hadn’t–considering that Taft died at the end of July 1953 from cancer that was asymptomatic until earlier that year. The question is who would’ve been Vice President at the time. Given the importance of the California delegation in the actual process, one possibility is Governor Earl Warren…but another is its junior Senator, a young man in a hurry named Richard Milhous Nixon. Imagine a world in which Nixon became President in 1953….

  104. 104.

    Taylor

    November 11, 2012 at 11:20 am

    @Brachiator:

    I could see Romney being offered a job as ambassador to Mexico, France or Great Britain

    The Brits will not soon forget his comments about their running of the Olympics.

    Ambassador to Luxemburg, or Cayman Islands as already noted, seems more appropriate.

  105. 105.

    WereBear

    November 11, 2012 at 11:21 am

    @Villago Delenda Est: Limbaugh knows nothing, nothing about the nuts and bolts of policy. He’s a pure bullshitter, and his bullshit damages his brand, it doesn’t help it.

    I forget where I read it, but some R leader/pundit was lamenting that “these talk radio guys, they are making millions but damaging the party.”

    And I thought, Geez people, I thought that was your philosophy in a nutshell.

  106. 106.

    bemused

    November 11, 2012 at 11:24 am

    @IowaOldLady:

    He has a higher tolerance level than I would have….I can only stand about 5 minutes of video Fox greatest stupidity hits here and there.

  107. 107.

    El Cid

    November 11, 2012 at 11:25 am

    @WereBear: Yeah, not to mention, if Rush Limbaugh is so great a businessman he can make such a fortune, how can he be wrong about politics?

    If you make a lot of money and are a right winger, it means that you’re right, by definition, by heavenly decree.

  108. 108.

    hoodie

    November 11, 2012 at 11:25 am

    @aimai: yep. Multi-level marketing seems to be the preferred form of organization in right wing circles, it’s infused in everything from churches to campaign organizations. OT, but anybody catch Chris Hayes this morning? He had on this smug asshole from Bain. Hayes is talking about the failure of Republican messaging and asks him straightforwardly about whether he bought into the “makers vs. takers” theme. Initially he says he’s not down with that construction, but 15 minutes later he resurrects it as “investors vs. consumers.” They cannot get past this incessant need to create hierarchies, i.e., creating a rationalization for stepping on someone else to get ahead. It’s in the DNA.

  109. 109.

    maya

    November 11, 2012 at 11:32 am

    I see a for-profit Mitt Romney On-Line High School mill conducted exclusively through Comcast in his future.

  110. 110.

    bemused

    November 11, 2012 at 11:34 am

    Anyone think of the possibility of one (or more) of Mitt’s boys climbing onto the political train with eventual presidential hopes? Fourth time trying for the WH could be the charm after Romney Sr one time and Mitt two times failures.

  111. 111.

    Hillary Rettig

    November 11, 2012 at 11:34 am

    I’m hoping this experience has soured the entire Romney clan on running for office, but i’m not counting on it. I’m guessing we’ll see one of his kids run one day. Hill

  112. 112.

    NotMax

    November 11, 2012 at 11:42 am

    @Hillary Rettig

    Discomfiting thought that they could conceivably fan out and run for 5 governorships.

  113. 113.

    PurpleGirl

    November 11, 2012 at 11:45 am

    @hoodie: Not so much hierarchies as bifurcating the population into two oppositional groups: investors v. consumers and makers v. takers.

  114. 114.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 11, 2012 at 11:47 am

    20 years ago, I saw a magazine cover that had a picture of Rush Limbaugh on it, and the text read “The leader of the opposition”.

    He’s had this role as the default leader of the GOP for a long time, which helps explain the long term damage to the Republican party that we’ve seen. The rot started with Nixon, was helped along by Reagan, and has only been getting worse. The effort by the likes of Buckley, Weyrich, Viguerie, and Norquist to transform the GOP in to the party that stands on the tracks and tries to stop the train that is the future has turned it into a rump party of fearful, resentful old white men, pining for an imaginary past.

  115. 115.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 11, 2012 at 11:49 am

    @NotMax:

    Ala the Bush Crime Family, which simultaneously held the governorships of Texas and Florida.

  116. 116.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    November 11, 2012 at 11:52 am

    @NotMax: That’s unreal. Geebus.

  117. 117.

    Hill Dweller

    November 11, 2012 at 11:54 am

    Why is the Village trying so hard to convince the public Obama doesn’t have a mandate?

  118. 118.

    Patricia Kayden

    November 11, 2012 at 11:57 am

    @kay: You forgot his birther “joke” where he boasted to his Michigan supporters that noone had ever asked him for his birth certificate.

    He’s a disgusting human being and I’m glad he lost soundly.

  119. 119.

    aimai

    November 11, 2012 at 11:59 am

    @Or something like that.Suffern Ace:

    Yes, is that real? What level of disgusting cowardice would it take for Jill Stein not to make her own speech? I note that at the bottom the thing is defined/tagged as “comedy.” Can it really be for real?

    Also: I want to add to my predictions that the Romney boys and Anne split from Mitt in some unobvious way–like Ann starts living primarily at one house while he lives at another and one or more of the boys comes out as either liberal (ish) or gay or both.

    aimai

  120. 120.

    Or something like that.Suffern Ace

    November 11, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    @Hill Dweller: Because 1) they are in income tax brackets that will pay more in taxes. 2) with their rush to influence the election by creating Mittmentum almost single handedly defeated by Nate Silver, they lost Tuesday as well. Plus they’re all a bunch of cowboy dreaming st. Ronnie lovers now. If you don’t win like st Ronnie, no one really loves you.

  121. 121.

    maya

    November 11, 2012 at 12:03 pm

    @Hill Dweller:

    Why is the Village trying so hard to convince the public Obama doesn’t have a mandate?

    Because the majority of old, white, beer gutted, mans dated Romney?

  122. 122.

    hoodie

    November 11, 2012 at 12:08 pm

    @PurpleGirl: You can’t have hierarchies without differentiation. You define the groups to support the hierarchies. For example, investors are “better” than consumers and thus deserve disproportionate power, despite the fact that investors in large part rely on consumers for their wealth, and despite the fact that many of these “consumers” actually are making investments in things like their families, maintenance of our society and education of our children, while many of these “investors” are actually consuming much of the productive capacity of our country and it’s irreplaceable resources so that they can be more powerful.

  123. 123.

    kay

    November 11, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    @Patricia Kayden:

    There were so many moments like that. There was no reason he had to go on 60 minutes and spout that ridiculous Bush-era nonsense about emergency rooms being a health care safety net. HE KNOWS BETTER. He doesn’t lack knowledge. He lacks character. They couldn’t “fix” that.

    He had SO MANY opportunities to reveal the the “real” better Mitt Romney. He passed on all of them.

  124. 124.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 11, 2012 at 12:12 pm

    @Hill Dweller:

    The vile parasites are afraid their taxes might go up.

  125. 125.

    Chris

    November 11, 2012 at 12:14 pm

    @WereBear:

    La Cosa Nostra probably thinks so.

    Or did you mean an *honest* skilled job?

  126. 126.

    Sister Rail Gun of Warm Humanitarianism

    November 11, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    @fourmorewars: I know there’s a petition gathering signatures on whitehouse.gov for Louisiana secession.

  127. 127.

    Chris

    November 11, 2012 at 12:17 pm

    @Craigo:

    Yeah, from what I remember reading about Dewey, I don’t think he was nearly the waste of a human body Mittens has been. Still would’ve voted Truman, mind you.

  128. 128.

    Jewish Steel

    November 11, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    @aimai:

    Also: I want to add to my predictions that the Romney boys and Anne split from Mitt in some unobvious way—like Ann starts living primarily at one house while he lives at another and one or more of the boys comes out as either liberal (ish) or gay or both.

    That’s solid, aimai. I’ll co-sign this prediction. I’ve thought much the same thing.

  129. 129.

    handsmile

    November 11, 2012 at 12:27 pm

    @WereBear:

    I think you may be referring to remarks made by David From on Friday’s “Morning Joe”:

    “The problem with the Republican leaders is that they are cowards…The real locus of the problem is the Republican activist base and the Republican donor base…Republicans have been fleeced and exploited and lied to by a conservative entertainment complex.”

    Rush Limbaugh and Roger Ailes are the de facto leaders of the GOP; Grover Norquist may well be the third leg of this diabolical stool (in all its meanings). There is not a single GOP officeholder or aspirant who dares to go up against them. Such omnipotence is a reliable measure of leadership status.

    David Atkins at Digby’s blog has an excellent post on Frum’s eviscerating analysis and the befuddled response of Joe and his fraternity buddies:

    http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/frum-on-morning-joe-remarkable-15.html

  130. 130.

    Gindy51

    November 11, 2012 at 12:27 pm

    @PurpleGirl: Not even a road stop outhouse, poor Willard. not even good enough to shit in.

  131. 131.

    andy

    November 11, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    @WereBear: The skill is avoiding the inevitable revenge. It’s sure to happen sometime. You take away somebody’s livelihood, in a way you take away somebody’s life. Why do you think the Office Shooting is so common nowadays?

  132. 132.

    Charity Froggenhall

    November 11, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    @fourmorewars: Awesome, let ’em go. And in the next natural disaster, we won’t be responsible for FEMA money for them.

  133. 133.

    Chris

    November 11, 2012 at 12:31 pm

    @Schlemizel:

    From what little I’ve read of him, Hoover reminds me of Louis XVI or Mikhail Gorbachev – not all that bad a guy, certainly not as bad as most of his predecessors, but ultimately overwhelmed by events and paying for the flaws in all the sins of the fucked up system he inherited.

  134. 134.

    Gindy51

    November 11, 2012 at 12:33 pm

    @aimai: And that in a nut shell is why he got less Mormon votes than Bush did.

  135. 135.

    gVOR08

    November 11, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Obama should offer Romney the only federal public service job for which Romney has solid experience. Put Romney in charge of coordinating and promoting the implimentation of Obamacare. I don’t know if Romney’s head would explode, but several other would.

  136. 136.

    JoyfulA

    November 11, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    @Craigo: Dewey was apparently more successful than the Democrats, who also offered Ike the job.

  137. 137.

    trollhattan

    November 11, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    Willard can go back to France and this time, pay those heathens to join the church.

    That would be cool.

  138. 138.

    M31

    November 11, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    about the Obama mandate, Dick Morris said it perfectly the other day: they were expecting a 325 Electoral vote Romney landslide, but what we got was a 332 Electoral vote Obama squeaker.

  139. 139.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 12:42 pm

    @Chris:

    I don’t think you could find a former President more reviled in his time that Hoover. Thats not to say he was a bad guy or incompetent only that he was the guy who bought the BS of the 1% and continued the process of appointing crooks and incompetents. Really the only difference between him and Boy Blunder was Hoover was not a bad guy & he was competent, just not as President.

    Had Truman not seen Hoovers abilities and used them he would have remained on histories scrap heap

  140. 140.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 11, 2012 at 12:42 pm

    Garry Wills’ fairly brutal assessment of Mitt Romney’s future

    He will no doubt return to augmenting his vast and hidden wealth, with no more pesky questions about where around the world it is stashed, or what taxes (if any) he paid, carefully sheltered from the rules his fellow citizens follow.

    :|

  141. 141.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 11, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    But will his millions hug him at night? No, wait, his wife will hug him at night because he’s not in jail where he belongs

  142. 142.

    M31

    November 11, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    Interestingly, it’s been shown that if a family has a lot of boys, the younger ones are increasingly likely to be gay. A hormonal shift in the mother is thought to be the likely cause.

    So who’s the youngest Mittling and how high does he ping your gaydar?

  143. 143.

    PeakVT

    November 11, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    @handsmile: Scarborough’s reaction to Frum’s second mini-rant cracked me up: “uh, hey, so, Chuck Todd…”

  144. 144.

    trollhattan

    November 11, 2012 at 12:50 pm

    @NotMax:
    Holy [email protected]#k, we’re going to have a combo megaquake AND flood at once, next year? I gotta list the house and start packing, stat!

  145. 145.

    hoodie

    November 11, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    @handsmile: I caught that Morning Schmoe and was taken aback by how frank Frum was and amused how Schmoe and his buddies tried to change the subject because it hit them where they live. Gerson actually has said similar things, though not as starkly as Frum. However, the thing is that guys like Frum can’t explain is why they just don’t become Democrats, or at least independents aligned with Democrats. Obama is closer to the Republican president they’ve always wanted, and there are plenty of conservadems that represent their interests better than anyone in the Republican Party. Their interests would be better served if they hastened the demise of the Republican Party, as that would inevitably lead to a splintering of Democrats into left and right factions, with the Overton Window pushed back to the left. There are too many established warlords in the Republican Party to save it, and Democrats already serve the interests of those who aren’t in the camps of those warlords.

  146. 146.

    JoyfulA

    November 11, 2012 at 12:54 pm

    @Cacti: A lot of the Gates philanthropy is great, but a lot of it has gone to develop and fund charter schools.

  147. 147.

    Bill D.

    November 11, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @Bill E Pilgrim:

    I still hear a lot of them talking about their big sweep in 2010, so you know, win some lose some, not realizing that it was just a gerrymandered illusion.

    Please, redistricting happens the year after the new census data come out, as the races start before those data are even available. The districts that people were running in during 2010 were largely drawn in 2001 after the 2000 elections.

    Actually, it was the big off-year wins in state legislative races around the country in November 2010, due to poor Democratic turnout, which gave the Republicans the political muscle to do so much gerrymandering in 2011. It’s the 2012 districts which are gerrymandered and which gave Republican candidates for the House an unfair advantage as documented by the vote totals.

  148. 148.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 11, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @hoodie:

    However, the thing is that guys like Frum can’t explain is why they just don’t become Democrats, or at least independents aligned with Democrats.

    Because after losing their meal ticket in the conservative media, people like Frum have to keep that gimmick or no one will pay them to speak on Fox or MSNBC

  149. 149.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    November 11, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    @handsmile: Good. Lord. That clip is nine minutes of pure Villagery.

    Joe Scarborough, Chuck Todd, David Gregory, Mark Halperin and David Frum… and a young woman I don’t recognize. Who says not one word, and is not asked one question, for nine plus minutes.

    That fucking douche parade (with apologies to the one I don’t recoginze) is from EvenTheLiberalMSNBC?

    Well, shut my mouth. David Frum is pointing out (almost, mostly) pointing out that Republicans have no platform for people who aren’t, like most people on TV (a pet peeve of mine) economically secure (rich) and health insured. My apologies to the Grumpy Code Monkey.

    Mark Halperin: “I’m a fan of John Cornyn”. Not surprising, but can you imagine if a ‘straight reporter” said “I’m a fan of Patrick Leahy”, or John Kerry, or Dick Durbin.

  150. 150.

    scav

    November 11, 2012 at 1:15 pm

    @NotMax: Ow Ow Ow Ow Ow. Many, Most! of the greens I’ve met deserve better. I broke down at the litany of disasters that were ravishing this country. I’m giving up on the comment here, that wreck is delusional. We need better parties across the spectrum for this thing to work better.

  151. 151.

    Chris

    November 11, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @Schlemizel:

    I don’t think you could find a former President more reviled in his time that Hoover.

    You think the Carter-hate’s been as bad? That one’s been pretty intense in the last thirty years (with less justification, but it’s out there).

  152. 152.

    redshirt

    November 11, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    I don’t give W. much credit for anything, but I was gladdened to see him stay far away for the last 4 years.

    He could have done a lot of damage if he tried to be a shadow President or something similar.

  153. 153.

    LD50

    November 11, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    @M31: no doubt about it, Ben is the one who’ll come out as gay or liberal: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jpmoore/the-romney-sons-a-guide

  154. 154.

    LD50

    November 11, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    @Chris: Hoover hate was worse. Carter hate was something the GOP had to remind everyone of, since Carter didn’t actually ruin anyone’s lives. Hoover beat off and said a lot of appallingly 1%er type shit for the first 3 years of the Depression while people’s lives crashed and burned. People hated Hoover.

  155. 155.

    SiubhanDuinne

    November 11, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    @Kirk: Thanks. That sounds like a good approach for me.

    As the child and grandchild of bookstore owners, I ended up acquiring or inheriting a slew of first editions, autographed volumes, etc., so I do need to see what I’m dealing with before I start merrily pitching.

  156. 156.

    The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge

    November 11, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    @Chris:

    Yeah, I think the Carter-Hate has been much worse. Once Roosevelt was elected (and reelected 61/49!) there was no percentage in demonizing Hoover any more, but the imaginary Jimmy Carter the right wing has created has been a great whipping boy for 30 years now.

    Of course, what’s killing them is that President Carter is the most respected and beloved American around the world. It eats away at their innards….

  157. 157.

    SiubhanDuinne

    November 11, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    @gelfling545:

    You’re not very inspiring :-P

  158. 158.

    SiubhanDuinne

    November 11, 2012 at 1:34 pm

    @Brother Shotgun of Sweet Reason:
    Heh.

  159. 159.

    Lurking Canadian

    November 11, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    @Hill Dweller: There’s a D after his name and his election is tainted by an excess of melanin and a deficiency of Y-chromosomes.

  160. 160.

    Mnemosyne

    November 11, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    @LD50:

    I’ve gotta agree with you that the Hoover-hate is more persistent. They’re still singing “We’d Like to Thank You, Herbert Hoover” on stages all over the United States every week. So far, no one has written a hit musical about how awful the Carter years were.

  161. 161.

    WereBear

    November 11, 2012 at 1:52 pm

    @redshirt: I believe W had a LOT of help in staying sub rosa. His own party doesn’t want him running around reminding people he existed.

  162. 162.

    JosieJ

    November 11, 2012 at 1:58 pm

    @kay:

    There were so many moments like that. There was no reason he had to go on 60 minutes and spout that ridiculous Bush-era nonsense about emergency rooms being a health care safety net. HE KNOWS BETTER. He doesn’t lack knowledge. He lacks character. They couldn’t “fix” that.
    He had SO MANY opportunities to reveal the the “real” better Mitt Romney. He passed on all of them.

    That’s because there was no “real” better Mitt Romney. We kept searching beneath the surface to find one, only to find that he was all surface.

    His most enduring legacy will be that multi-millionaires who run for president in the future will no longer be required to disclose the source, or even the extent, of their wealth. It figures that a man who’s all surface would make it harder to penetrate beneath the surface of others.

  163. 163.

    LD50

    November 11, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Yeah, Hoover hate was a very grassroots thing. Everyday people whose lives had bottomed out despised him for doing nothing at a horrible time in American history. They even named a type of shantytown after him, FFS. Carter hate, on the other hand, is something kept alive by the GOP as a thing that people who are obsessed with politics are supposed to feel. Most people don’t hate Carter, at worst they feel he was an ineffectual president.

    This is all obscured by the fact that the people who hated Hoover are almost all dead now, but it was still something my parents could invoke as recently as the 1970s.

  164. 164.

    Ted & Hellen

    November 11, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    Mitt will be non existent within a month.

  165. 165.

    blingee

    November 11, 2012 at 2:07 pm

    I look forward to reading about (will never watch) his appearance on Celebrity Apprentice along with all the other has beens crying out for attention. Trump included.

  166. 166.

    redshirt

    November 11, 2012 at 2:13 pm

    You know, Mitt seems clueless enough that he might just plow ahead and pretend he’s all Senior Statesmen. Hello Dancin’ Dave? Got a seat open next to Johnny Mac?

  167. 167.

    catclub

    November 11, 2012 at 2:15 pm

    @dmsilev: I think Paul Ryan is as close to chief of the party as anyone. They are all talking about the thing he is supposed to be an expert on – the deficit and cutting budgets.

    The teflon with which he slid away from any connection with the recent unhappiness is notable ( at least to me).

  168. 168.

    FlipYrWhig

    November 11, 2012 at 2:22 pm

    Nothing more than a hunch, but I have a feeling that Romney will be tapped to be the figurehead of a major charity, like when Elizabeth Dole was head of the Red Cross.

  169. 169.

    catclub

    November 11, 2012 at 2:23 pm

    @Jewish Steel: Wow, I don’t see either of those things, unless they also renounce Mormonism ( and whatever inheritance they would have coming.)

    The one thing Mitt never wavered on was Mormonism. I thought that if he could convincingly lie about a profound conversion experience,
    he could get a whole lot of baptists VERY enthusiastic. he never did it. He would lose mormons. Wasn’t there some quote about
    “something something is worth a mass”?

    he did less well than McCain in the south, even though those folks were primed with 4 years of Obama hate.

  170. 170.

    DPS

    November 11, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    There is no “Mitt Romney” constituency that wants to see him do anything. The only reason anybody ever supported him was that they thought he could win and, after the primaries, because they wanted to win the election. There is no post-election demand for Mitt, no army that he leads behind him. The best he could do is put some of that money towards something worthwhile, and I think we know he won’t do that.

  171. 171.

    Elie

    November 11, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    @JosieJ:

    I disagree about the financial disclosure. Future millionaires will have a lot of pressure to disclose even though Romney refused. He also lost — significantly. If he had won — maybe. Now — a whole lot of crap is going to be challenged — the continual lying, the cheating on taxes and full out frontal racism. The shit didn’t work and nothing kills strategy more than having failed before. Oh I am sure that they might try it.. like everything else… but their whole approach was all loser and they know it!

  172. 172.

    Elie

    November 11, 2012 at 2:30 pm

    @FlipYrWhig:

    I don’t think so. This wasn’t a “regular” loss. He not only embarrassed himself, but the Republicans also embarrassed themselves. They not only failed, they looked unbearably stupid and un-modern — No organization is going to want to have that associated with their mission. Nope — he is headed home to send his cars up and down the elevator.

  173. 173.

    Jeffro

    November 11, 2012 at 3:04 pm

    @NotMax: wasn’t that the plot of a great Clive Cussler novel? The corrupt children of a Dr No-type assumed power in something like Egypt and Mexico??

    Oh wait, duh, more obviously: W and Jeb…

  174. 174.

    Chris

    November 11, 2012 at 3:10 pm

    @The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge:

    He’s another one who kinda reminds me of Gorbachev. Hated at home, but beloved in the world at large.

  175. 175.

    JosieJ

    November 11, 2012 at 3:24 pm

    @Elie:

    I hope you’re right, Elie. I’m not very sanguine, simply because Romney came very close to getting away with it.

  176. 176.

    elftx

    November 11, 2012 at 3:26 pm

    Anyone else notice the number of ads from financial and pharmaceutical co.’s with a woman and a horse…hehehehe

    Methinks they figured it was all theirs lock stock and barrel.

  177. 177.

    Full Metal Wingnut

    November 11, 2012 at 3:26 pm

    What fucking squeaker? According to Wikipedia (and some basic arithmetic), Bush beat Kerry by 2.4% of the popular vote, Obama beat Romney by 2.7. So unless the Republicans want to make a similar comment about 04, they should kindly shut the fuck up.

  178. 178.

    Xecky Gilchrist

    November 11, 2012 at 3:40 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est: 20 years ago, I saw a magazine cover that had a picture of Rush Limbaugh on it, and the text read “The leader of the opposition”.

    I think that that has had a lot to do with the deterioration of the Party. That is, a lot of the leading proponents of the Republicans’ aren’t even politicians; they’re grifters who don’t really have a dog in the political fight. If the Party loses, Limbaugh still wins – he gets to whine and threaten revolution. In fact, he probably does better when the Republicans are out of power.

    It tickles me no end that Rush is getting paid $50MM/yr to point out that the Republicans are dicks.

  179. 179.

    Not Sure

    November 11, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    @WereBear: I think there should be a stiff penalty charged for someone to repatriate assets. All that money can stay in the Caymans, for all I care.

  180. 180.

    Carla H

    November 11, 2012 at 3:55 pm

    @Cacti:

    I imagine Melinda leaned pretty hard on Bill for the philanthropy.

    You’d think, but his dad is a philanthropist, too. I wouldn’t be surprised if a good portion of Bill’s giving was learned from his parents.

  181. 181.

    trollhattan

    November 11, 2012 at 4:01 pm

    @catclub:
    The Onion thinks Republicans will be lead by a white-hot sphere of rage.

    http://www.theonion.com/video/after-obama-victory-shrieking-whitehot-sphere-of-p,30284/

  182. 182.

    elftx

    November 11, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    Also Too this

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petitions/all/0/2/0/

  183. 183.

    Paul

    November 11, 2012 at 4:12 pm

    @Full Metal Wingnut:

    What fucking squeaker? According to Wikipedia (and some basic arithmetic), Bush beat Kerry by 2.4% of the popular vote, Obama beat Romney by 2.7. So unless the Republicans want to make a similar comment about 04, they should kindly shut the fuck up.

    Furthermore, if the popular vote mattered one bit, don’t they realize that Obama would have spent all his time in California, New York, Massachusetts, Illinois etc to run up the score? They are pulling the same stupid, illogical trick that Hillary Clinton’s supporters tried in the 2008 primary.

    Bottomline: Obama won the EC in a landslide. The popular vote does not matter (as per the constitution they CLAIM to love so much). And if it had mattered, Obama could easily have run up the score in his states.

  184. 184.

    Bex

    November 11, 2012 at 4:21 pm

    @Brachiator: Yeah, the Mittster is real popular in Great Britian.

  185. 185.

    YellowJournalism

    November 11, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    @elftx: Some of those just scream crazy. My favorite is: “Not allow the FDA to regulate premium cigars.”

  186. 186.

    YellowJournalism

    November 11, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    @NotMax: I don’t know much about Stein, but was she really advocating a “one child per family” rule/law? Because that’s worked so well in China!

  187. 187.

    different-church-lady

    November 11, 2012 at 4:30 pm

    @Sister Rail Gun of Warm Humanitarianism:

    I know there’s a petition gathering signatures on whitehouse.gov for Louisiana secession.

    I say let ’em go, and then we don’t have to bother redesigning the flag when Peurto Rico comes in.

  188. 188.

    John

    November 11, 2012 at 4:31 pm

    Dewey didn’t immediately abandon public life. He was still governor of New York in 1948, and was re-elected in 1950. By that point he was an elder statesman of the internationalist eastern establishment wing of the Republican Party, and was a key supporter of Eisenhower in his victory over Taft in 1952. He was apparently partly responsible for the choice of Nixon as Eisenhower’s running mate, and his people took key roles in the Eisenhower administration – both Dulles, the new Secretary of State, and Brownell, the new Attorney General, were old Dewey advisers.

    In 1956, Dewey was also apparently responsible for convincing Eisenhower not to dump Nixon.

  189. 189.

    Triassic Sands

    November 11, 2012 at 4:31 pm

    It’s worth clicking “Next” at the bottom of the Will’s piece to read Elizabeth Drew’s comments on the real but failed GOP efforts to “steal” the election through voter suppression.

    Romney’s long term reputation should include his campaign’s efforts to suppress Democratic votes; the fact that he failed is a testament to both the determined efforts on the left to prevent another stolen election and Romney’s more or less universal incompetence.

    Note to the anti-democratic thugs in the GOP (aka virtually the entire party): It’s a good idea, when you plan to steal an election, to keep that fact to yourselves; announcing that your latest legislative vote suppressing scheme will deliver your state (PA) to Romney is not a great idea. Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris went about their business a lot more quietly and in the end delivered Florida and the election to brother George.

    In the future, I expect the GOP to invest huge sums of money in “Cones of Silence” since Mitt proved that even behind closed doors in the presence of your most loyal subjects offensive comments may still escape to reach a wider audience.

  190. 190.

    elftx

    November 11, 2012 at 4:34 pm

    @YellowJournalism:
    I don’t get that one at all..but noticed the few signatures for repeal of NDAA
    I happen to reside in TX and lol at LA having more signatures than us to secede

  191. 191.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    @Chris:

    No, my grandparents and parents remembered Hoover and I grew up in a factory neighborhood. 40 years later they still HATED the guy. People may laugh at Carter or say he was incompetent but never heard the hate for him that I heard for Herbie

  192. 192.

    Schlemizel

    November 11, 2012 at 5:26 pm

    @LD50: OMG!

    Gaydar firing 5 alarms!

  193. 193.

    RSA

    November 11, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    @brettvk:

    I don’t think Mitt is stupid. I think he’d like to have a legacy as the sort of international statesman that Jimmy Carter has made himself, but I don’t think he could possibly force himself to be that generous.

    Right, I can just see Mitt showing up at a Habitat for Humanity project.

    On the leadership of the Republican party, I think the conventional wisdom from Carter through Bush II was that the best Presidential candidates were popular governors rather than members of Congress; presumably they had less baggage in the way of hard votes. I don’t know that this applies any more, but maybe a popular Republican governor might try to pull the party together. (Mostly when I think “Republican governor,” though, I think of very bad men.)

  194. 194.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    November 11, 2012 at 7:25 pm

    Erick, Son of Erick, is getting over his grief in the usual way crazy wingers do, backwards! He has a post up at Redstate where he has posted a copy of something he wrote a year ago stating that Romney was someone who was on every side of an issue, not a real conservative, lose the election to Obama and be the death of conservatism. The only thing he adds as an update is at the end, where he says that he is reconsidering his stance that Huntsman wasn’t a better candidate than Romney.

    IOW, forget all about his humping Romney’s leg like a horndog in the general because he was right before he was wrong! Erick is working through the five stages of grief backwards.

    Acceptance: Erick pretty much immediately accepted that Obama won, even tweeting to Obama ‘Thanks for getting it over with quick’. Done Deal.

    Depression: He posted a depressing tome about the loss at Redstate after the election that tried to reassure everyone that while it was bad, it wasn’t the end of the world. That they all had their families and they would get through this.

    Bargaining: He opines about a variety of things that could have gone different with most thoughts leaning towards the right not having to had to anything different, such as having their rape candidates shut their mouths and keeping those ‘facts’ to themselves, and having had a better ground game. Not much thought is given to doing something about their problem with minorities other than improving their message without changing anything else that could positively affect minority opinions.

    Anger: Erick lashes out at those who say that the social conservative need to be thrown out of the party. Erick lashes out at the crappy consultants who didn’t know their asses from a hole in the ground.

    Denial: Today Erick is rewriting his personal history on Romney in the primary and general by telling everyone ‘I told you so!’.

    One RS member had the audacity to opine to Erick that he wasn’t any better than Romney:

    This post saves you and your RedState brand, but what does it say about you that you went against your own values, common sense, and what seems to be, adroit political savvy, and supported and voted for Romney, and rather forcefully, convinced others on this site to vote for him, even though you knew early on that he had no conservative principles or backbone? You accuse Romney of having 2 sides on every issue, but, it seems as if you did also. You would have had a stronger leg to stand on had you stuck with what your gut told you, but no, you went on to convince most of your readership, in the end, that Romney was a viable standard bearer to carry on the conservative cause in the general. As much as you, Erik Erikson, try to distance yourself from Romney’s dismal loss, you too are implicated. Saying “I told ya so,” after you, yourself, went against your own judgement makes me question how much of an independent thinking, conservative voice you are, and why, in this cycle at least, you ended up being simply a water carrier for the (as you predicted) fools gold candidacy of Willard “Mitt” Romney. I would hope other readers on this site would take heed of this, and be more critical of the voices who proclaim to be your mouthpieces. It just sounds like you, along with most on the Right, in the end, ignored the right thing to do, not supporting a Republican nominee that, 20 years ago, was battling to be as liberal as Teddy Kennedy, and tried to go for the easy and expedient win over Barack Obama.

    Erick has not responded but his members have. The argument “We fight in the primary and back the winner in the general, no matter what” is winning the day. Erick just can’t accept the fact that he is part of the problem with the party. Working through the five stages of grief backwards is probably part of his problem.

    If the five stages of grief enable you to get through and deal with a difficult time in your life, doing it backwards must help you to avoid it.

  195. 195.

    priscianusjr

    November 11, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    The comparison with Willkie is very superficial. Running against Roosevelt in 1940, Willkie didn’t have a chance, and he was much ridiculed, I suppose, for even thinking he was worthy to replace FDR. As in this poem I learned from my mother:
    “A horse’s tail is soft and silky,
    Lift it up and you’ll see Willkie.”

    But my mother also told me that Willkie, a liberal Republican, was actually a fairly good guy. Proof of this was that after he lost, he was appointed by Roosevelt a sort of roving ambassador, or personal representative.

    Nothing like Romney, really.

  196. 196.

    opie_jeanne

    November 11, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    @PeakVT: Even my family, Republicans to the core, disliked and distrusted Wilkie. I don’t know who they voted for that year.

  197. 197.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    November 11, 2012 at 8:04 pm

    A funny response in the Redstate diary I reference above:

    I was listening to a radio call in show the other day. A group of republicans were discussing who the future Republican candidates for president should be. One guy spoke up and said whoever it is, that person should be 180 degrees the opposite of Romney. Gov. Romney called in and said he could be that guy.

    It didn’t go over too well. Republicans just don’t have a sense of humor.

    Holy fuck, Erick responds to the criticism such as I quoted above:

    It is time for you to stop visiting RedState then. That I and many others never could gel with Romney and his campaign should have been a warning flag the whole time.

    Shorter Erick: “You should have known that we were lying to you!”

    The brass on this guy… ;p

  198. 198.

    Terry Ott

    November 11, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    @RoonieRoo:
    Marco Rubio, I suppose.

  199. 199.

    Ruckus

    November 11, 2012 at 9:14 pm

    @aimai:
    Do you have a really mean streak or just going with the law of averages? Either way works, just different motivations.

  200. 200.

    Ruckus

    November 11, 2012 at 9:19 pm

    @kay:
    He didn’t pass on showing the “real” zomney, he doubled down by showing his shitty character.

  201. 201.

    Matt McIrvin

    November 11, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    @catclub: “Paris is worth a Mass”, supposedly said by Henri IV of France, formerly a Huguenot, upon conversion to Catholicism so he could ascend the throne.

  202. 202.

    Matt McIrvin

    November 11, 2012 at 10:06 pm

    @Carla H: I think Bill Gates had been planning to do this for a long time. For years and years, he was conspicuous for his relative lack of philanthropy and kept making oblique statements implying that he was planning something really big. I recall Ted Turner suggesting that he was full of it.

  203. 203.

    Mike G

    November 11, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @Odie Hugh Manatee:

    Shorter Erick: “You should have known that we were lying to you!”

    It’s the Flounder from Animal House defense:
    “You fucked up – you trusted us!”

  204. 204.

    AA+ Bonds

    November 12, 2012 at 12:02 am

    @Odie Hugh Manatee:

    Shorter Erick: “You should have known that we were lying to you!”

    It is true that the Republicans really fucking hated Romney

    That was always the escape hatch for the opinion-makers on the right

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • MomSense on War for Ukraine Day 398: Ukrainian Air Defense! (Mar 29, 2023 @ 12:18am)
  • Prescott Cactus on War for Ukraine Day 398: Ukrainian Air Defense! (Mar 29, 2023 @ 12:04am)
  • patrick II on War for Ukraine Day 398: Ukrainian Air Defense! (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:58pm)
  • Ohio Mom on Russian Affairs Open Thread: The Child Snatchers (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:49pm)
  • Ohio Mom on Russian Affairs Open Thread: The Child Snatchers (Mar 28, 2023 @ 11:45pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!