• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

One of our two political parties is a cult whose leader admires Vladimir Putin.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

We’re watching the self-immolation of the leading world power on a level unprecedented in human history.

If America since Jan 2025 hasn’t broken your heart, you haven’t loved her enough.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Giving in to doom is how authoritarians win.

Giving in to doom is how we fail to fight for ourselves & one another.

Petty moves from a petty man.

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

75% of people clapping liked the show!

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

In after Baud. Damn.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

I’m more christian than these people and i’m an atheist.

Sometimes the world just tells you your cat is here.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Do we throw up our hands or do we roll up our sleeves? (hint, door #2)

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / The politics of rate increases

The politics of rate increases

by David Anderson|  March 17, 20178:59 am| 5 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

The Wall Street Journal has a good overview article of where insurers are thinking about their pricing for 2018 as they develop their offerings. The initial numbers are going to be ugly.

According to a nonpartisan report released by the Congressional Budget Office on Monday, the House Republicans’ bill, known as the American Health Care Act, could raise premiums by 15% to 20% for individual plans in 2018, compared with rates without the bill. These increases would largely be due to the end of penalties for people who lack insurance; the CBO suggested that fewer healthy people would enroll without the mandate, helping to raise average costs….
One important element isn’t fully resolved in the House Republicans’ blueprint: whether the federal government will fund cost-sharing subsidies that help pay for low-income consumers’ deductibles and other out-of-pocket charges….

“The more uncertainty, the higher the price,” said Martin Hickey, chief executive of New Mexico Health Connections. His nonprofit has seen a potential 40% premium increase on ACA marketplace plans.

There is normal medical price trend. There is also a highly uncertain policy environment. The environment is what will be driving most of the initial rate request.

Rate filings in May and June are not final. They are merely the start of a long series of conversations between the filing actuaries and the reviewing actuaries. Rates will go up, rates will go down, data will be requested and models will be tweaked.

So how do the incentives align?

Filing actuaries hate being wrong. They hate being wrong the most when it costs their employers money and them their jobs. They have every reason to file high. The reviewing actuaries don’t want to be wrong but they have a public trust component to their job where they need to make sure that the filing entity will be an ongoing viable business while not taking too much advantage of the public.

Republicans want high rates to be filed. It gives them a good headline when they’ll need one to keep their base in line. Insurance company executives won’t mind giving them a good headline as it is a low cost favor and the number that is filed in June will not be the number approved for November.

State insurance commissioners won’t mind high filings. They will be able to issue press releases and have interviews where they can clearly, cleanly and honestly state that due to their work, the initial rates came down by 50% before Open Enrollment.

The players with the ability to influence rates all have a shared incentive to have initially hideous numbers filed in June and then see hideous shaved down to merely bad for the first day of Open Enrollment in November.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « SWPA under AHCA because of UPMC
Next Post: DDoT Attack »

Reader Interactions

5Comments

  1. 1.

    mai naem mobile

    March 17, 2017 at 10:16 am

    I have no policy related stuff to say. I just hate the people in the GOP. They just enjoy people living in fear with uncertainty.

  2. 2.

    Lee

    March 17, 2017 at 12:12 pm

    I know if I dig around I can find the separate posts. It would be nice to have in one post the 4 or 5 accounting & actuarial fixes you think would make the ACA better functioning.

    If you posted it before my apologies.

  3. 3.

    TenguPhule

    March 17, 2017 at 1:09 pm

    Republican Treason. That’s all you can call this sabotage of the law.

  4. 4.

    MomSense

    March 17, 2017 at 2:17 pm

    I’ve got a bit of a list of improvements I would make to the ACA if I were a good faith actor and member of Congress, unlike the current GOP Reps.

    I would restore risk corridors.
    I would close the Medicaid Gap.
    I would make the 400 % FPL cliff into a gentle slope.

    There are a couple of others but these are my top three.

  5. 5.

    Lee

    March 17, 2017 at 2:25 pm

    @MomSense:

    Thanks!

    The risk corridors was what Rubio called ‘socialism’ right?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by BillinGlendaleCA (6/24/25)

Recent Comments

  • Paul in KY on OBBB Open Thread: Money Money Money Money (Jun 24, 2025 @ 11:43am)
  • Matt McIrvin on OBBB Open Thread: Money Money Money Money (Jun 24, 2025 @ 11:42am)
  • Paul in KY on OBBB Open Thread: Money Money Money Money (Jun 24, 2025 @ 11:42am)
  • dnfree on OBBB Open Thread: Money Money Money Money (Jun 24, 2025 @ 11:41am)
  • Matt McIrvin on Schrödinger’s Ceasefire (Open Thread) (Jun 24, 2025 @ 11:41am)

Personality Crisis Podcast (Cole, DougJ, mistermix)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!