• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

When someone says they “love freedom”, rest assured they don’t mean yours.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

Peak wingnut was a lie.

You don’t get to peddle hatred on saturday and offer condolences on sunday.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Just because you believe it, that doesn’t make it true.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I like you, you’re my kind of trouble.

Why is it so hard for them to condemn hate?

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

Nothing worth doing is easy.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

The words do not have to be perfect.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

It’s the corruption, stupid.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / The politics of rate increases

The politics of rate increases

by David Anderson|  March 17, 20178:59 am| 5 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

The Wall Street Journal has a good overview article of where insurers are thinking about their pricing for 2018 as they develop their offerings. The initial numbers are going to be ugly.

According to a nonpartisan report released by the Congressional Budget Office on Monday, the House Republicans’ bill, known as the American Health Care Act, could raise premiums by 15% to 20% for individual plans in 2018, compared with rates without the bill. These increases would largely be due to the end of penalties for people who lack insurance; the CBO suggested that fewer healthy people would enroll without the mandate, helping to raise average costs….
One important element isn’t fully resolved in the House Republicans’ blueprint: whether the federal government will fund cost-sharing subsidies that help pay for low-income consumers’ deductibles and other out-of-pocket charges….

“The more uncertainty, the higher the price,” said Martin Hickey, chief executive of New Mexico Health Connections. His nonprofit has seen a potential 40% premium increase on ACA marketplace plans.

There is normal medical price trend. There is also a highly uncertain policy environment. The environment is what will be driving most of the initial rate request.

Rate filings in May and June are not final. They are merely the start of a long series of conversations between the filing actuaries and the reviewing actuaries. Rates will go up, rates will go down, data will be requested and models will be tweaked.

So how do the incentives align?

Filing actuaries hate being wrong. They hate being wrong the most when it costs their employers money and them their jobs. They have every reason to file high. The reviewing actuaries don’t want to be wrong but they have a public trust component to their job where they need to make sure that the filing entity will be an ongoing viable business while not taking too much advantage of the public.

Republicans want high rates to be filed. It gives them a good headline when they’ll need one to keep their base in line. Insurance company executives won’t mind giving them a good headline as it is a low cost favor and the number that is filed in June will not be the number approved for November.

State insurance commissioners won’t mind high filings. They will be able to issue press releases and have interviews where they can clearly, cleanly and honestly state that due to their work, the initial rates came down by 50% before Open Enrollment.

The players with the ability to influence rates all have a shared incentive to have initially hideous numbers filed in June and then see hideous shaved down to merely bad for the first day of Open Enrollment in November.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « SWPA under AHCA because of UPMC
Next Post: DDoT Attack »

Reader Interactions

5Comments

  1. 1.

    mai naem mobile

    March 17, 2017 at 10:16 am

    I have no policy related stuff to say. I just hate the people in the GOP. They just enjoy people living in fear with uncertainty.

  2. 2.

    Lee

    March 17, 2017 at 12:12 pm

    I know if I dig around I can find the separate posts. It would be nice to have in one post the 4 or 5 accounting & actuarial fixes you think would make the ACA better functioning.

    If you posted it before my apologies.

  3. 3.

    TenguPhule

    March 17, 2017 at 1:09 pm

    Republican Treason. That’s all you can call this sabotage of the law.

  4. 4.

    MomSense

    March 17, 2017 at 2:17 pm

    I’ve got a bit of a list of improvements I would make to the ACA if I were a good faith actor and member of Congress, unlike the current GOP Reps.

    I would restore risk corridors.
    I would close the Medicaid Gap.
    I would make the 400 % FPL cliff into a gentle slope.

    There are a couple of others but these are my top three.

  5. 5.

    Lee

    March 17, 2017 at 2:25 pm

    @MomSense:

    Thanks!

    The risk corridors was what Rubio called ‘socialism’ right?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 12:29am)
  • strange visitor (from another planet) on Open Thread: Too Good Not to Share (Mar 21, 2023 @ 12:26am)
  • eversor on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 12:24am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 12:12am)
  • Carlo Graziani on War for Ukraine Day 390: The Owl Has Sharp Talons! (Mar 21, 2023 @ 12:08am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!