The Supreme Court will be releasing at least one opinion in just a few minutes.
Texas? We don’t know. I will be watching with great anticipation and will add more information to the post as it becomes available.
Today at SCOTUS: The court will release at least one opinion. Will the court rule on the challenges to Texas' abortion law, which the court heard on an accelerated basis on Nov. 1? We'll find out at 10 a.m. EST. Join us on our live blog starting at 9:45. https://t.co/HC2AqI0QwH
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) December 10, 2021
h/t Omnes Omnibus
SCOTUSblog will be live-blogging.
I see several of our Balloon Juice attorneys in the morning thread. Yay!
Open thread.
WaterGirl
I am always hopeful that the courts won’t sink to the depths of what I know they are capable of, and today is no different. Nervous, but hopeful.
Maybe today will be the day that they don’t completely destroy that hope
edit: I predict that today will not be a slow news day.
Omnes Omnibus
@WaterGirl: If it is the TX decision, I think they will kill it on the fact that it is basically a shitty, unenforceable law. They can to do that without touching on the underlying Roe issue.
JML
I have trouble seeing any good decision coming down from this court. With Alito, Comey Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Thomas on the bench you have 4 Justices that are absolute disasters who will fry the average person without a second thought. They are brutal ideologues. (While I don’t like Gorsuch, he’s a different cut, and Roberts is at least an institutionalist)
I warned people time and time again that the fate of the court was up in the 2016 election and people laughed at me.
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus: Or they will kill it because they are smart enough to draw the dotted line to guns and all manner of other vigilante laws that would hurt the things they care about.
They seem not to care at all about the rule of law, democracy, and rights of humans over rights of corporations.
Betty
Those words now strike fear in my heart.
James E Powell
@JML:
I warned people in 2000; in 2016 I begged them. Both times I was buked & scorned.
At times, Democratic leaning voters can be very hard to love.
Omnes Omnibus
That’s what I just said. // Seriously, it’s an easy decision.
Anonymous at Work
@WaterGirl: no, they’ll kill it because a Texas state court judge found it unconstitutional in practice and ripped it to shreds using “facts.” In order to preserve a pro-Dobbs ruling, the Republicans on the Court need to avoid these “facts.”
Fair Economist
Isn’t it unusual for SCOTUS to release major opinions mid-year?
L85NJGT
A Texas state judge ruled against the enforcement mechanism yesterday. Did an overplayed hand get forced?
schrodingers_cat
@James E Powell: Blue check Berners are still dunking on Hillary from their media perches.
Tell me in what way are they functionally different from MAGAs? They are the tea party of the left, Green Tea party for short
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus:
I think we are in agreement on this.
You said they would kill it on the fact that it is basically a shitty, unenforceable law. I think they would be perfectly fine with a shitty, unenforceable law that could be used against liberals.
If they were to kill this, it would look to me like a defensive stance, not because they have a problem with shitty laws that suit their collective ideology.
Eunicecycle
Wow, what a nothingburger. SCOTUSblog says law can still be enforced but abortion clinics can sue
ETA: I am not a lawyer.
WaterGirl
Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson
U.S. v. Texas
Can someone help decipher what these rulings are and what they mean?
laura
If it is the Texas law, I expect they’ll overturn it to then uphold the the 15 week ban later in 2022 to appear “reasonable” (it will not be a reasonable compromise). In doing so, I expect at least one of the terrible horrible awfuls will write seperately opining about upholding the bounty aspect of SB 8.
schrodingers_cat
U.S. SUPREME COURT ALLOWS ABORTION PROVIDERS TO PROCEED WITH CHALLENGE TO SIX-WEEK ABORTION BAN IN TEXAS
From Reuters
lowtechcyclist
Anyone who’s still obsessed with Hillary can be written off AFAIAC, regardless of where they are on the political spectrum. She’s been a private citizen for >5 years, and a shitload has happened in the meantime. If Hillary’s still living rent-free in their heads, then they should really seek psychiatric help.
oatler
The MSNBC “Breaking News” headline confused me.
eclare
@Eunicecycle: So the law is still tied up in courts. And in the real world, low income women in TX who can’t afford to travel out of state still cannot get an abortion.
Gotcha.
Omnes Omnibus
This whole thing was a nothingburger. They dismissed the case against certain defendants and kept the stay in place. FWIW even the liberal justices agreed with the dismissal of certain defendants. The case is where it was before for all practical purposes.
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus:
What stay?
WaterGirl
Omnes Omnibus
@WaterGirl: The law stays in effect. Status quo remains quo.
Matt McIrvin
So, they kicked the can down the road one more time.
WaterGirl
Also from SCOTUSblog:
That doesn’t sound like nothing to me. Translations, please. :-)
Spanky
@Omnes Omnibus:
Oh good. Now we can get back to talking about Baud and Steeplejack’s balls.
#Phrasing!#
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus: Still confused. I know what a stay is, but I thought the courts had declined to put a stay in place while this heads through the courts?
If there were a stay, I would think the law would NOT be in effect while it heads through the courts?
Anonymous At Work
@WaterGirl: Stay on the federal district court opinion ruling the law unconstitutional. Since his opinion is STAYED, it won’t go into effect. Upshot: The law is still in effect and the district court judge is now required to start over using US v TEXAS as guidance.
Practical effect: Law is in effect until SCOTUS rules on Dobbs et alia, giving Texas a chance to outlaw abortion after 6 weeks without a weird enforcement mechanism.
WaterGirl
@Anonymous At Work: Thank you.
Omnes Omnibus
@WaterGirl: There can be stays on orders staying other orders. End result of this decision is that the lawsuit can go forward, but the law remains in effect while the suit goes through the system. Women in TX are in almost exactly the same legal position as they were before this decision.
Almost Retired
@Anonymous At Work: yup, I agree. Non-surprising line-up as preview of Dobbs: five hard core conservatives sticking together, three reliable liberal votes, and a squish Roberts pretending he has any influence over the conservative bloc.
Omnes Omnibus
From SCOTUSblog: There’s a summary on page 17. “The Court unanimously rejects the petitioners’ theory for relief against state-court judges and agrees Judge Jackson should be dismissed from this suit. (2) A majority reaches the same conclusion with respect to the petitioners’ parallel theory for relief against state-court clerks. (3) With respect to the back-up theory of relief the petitioners present against Attorney General Paxton, a majority concludes that he must be dismissed. (4) At the same time, eight Justices hold this case may proceed past the motion to dismiss stage against . . . defendants with specific disciplinary authority over medical licensees, including the petitioners. (5) Every member of the Court accepts that the only named private-individual defendant, Mr. Dickson, should be dismissed.”
Betty
@WaterGirl: And that’s why I am worried about every decision from this Court.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@James E Powell:
Yup. We forgot 2000 and repeated it in 2016.
@schrodingers_cat: If you and I went into the metaphorical AI lab to create a bot that was a caricature of a Berner, it would generate content that sounds a lot like Sarah Jones. She unironically refers to Obama as President Drones, and is so warped she was shit-tweeting about Neera Tanden on her own wedding day. So naturally New York magazine gives her a platform
sab
So they upheld a stay on the district court’s stay on the law? So constitutional rights can be ignored until the S Ct gets around to ruling whether they do or do not still exist?
Mike in NC
In a better world, Thomas and Alito would drop dead tomorrow.
Another Scott
Horse’s mouth – US v Texas:
That’s it.
So, no easy federal solution to the SB8 issue, as I read it. IANAL.
Cheers,
Scott.
Alison Rose
@lowtechcyclist: Hillary to all of them
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus: I can’t find the translation for that anywhere.
:-)
WaterGirl
@sab: pretty much.
Joe Falco
From SCOTUSBlog
Just a repulsive, odious man.
JPL
@sab: If neighbors can spy on neighbors, there is no right to privacy. Am I reading too much into the ruling?
Nelle
@JML:I can still remember the angle of the sun on a woman’s face as she laughed when I brought up the Supreme Court on an October day in 2016. She would, she said, grudgingly and regrettfully vote for Clinton, but no way the men in her family would. They were Bernie all the way. I have the urge, from time to time, to drive down to that town and say “How do you like your blue-eyed boy, Mister Death” (apologies to Bernie’s brown eyes, e e cummings, and “Buffalo Bill’s”) .
Steve in the ATL
Alternative response: [vomit emoji]
sab
@JPL: My sister says this law reminds her more of life in China in the 1980s than in anything American. Neighbors spying on neighbors secretly reporting to others.
JPL
From Balloon Juice Doug
Opinion | Biden withdrew from Afghanistan because he saw the war against religious extremists there as unwinnable. Should he also withdraw from the United States?
Omnes Omnibus
@Nelle: BERNIE WASN’T ON THE BALLOT ANYMORE IN OCTOBER 2016!!!!!
I know that you know that. I just couldn’t help myself.
Omnes Omnibus
@Steve in the ATL: That’s how I read it too. Conditioned response?
Anyway
@lowtechcyclist:
HRC fan here, voted for her in 2016 and still have PTSD from watching the results as they came in.
I still don’t get the reasoning behind releasing the speech she’d have given had she won – as part of this MasterClass.
JPL
Sotomayor’s statement is worth reading.
Adam Serwer ? on Twitter: “Sotomayor says the right wing majority’s position on abortion rights in Texas is Calhounist. https://t.co/TWswPkQnVm” / Twitter
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@JPL: is there anyway for DougJ to make his shtick into an NFT? he’s become something of a twitter celebrity in the last few months
JPL
trump voters must be really pleased to find out they have no right to privacy.
daveNYC
@WaterGirl: They’ll kill it because they don’t need it. They have enough votes to do whatever they want without having to deal with weird and messy rules lawyering.
Nelle
@Omnes Omnibus: Welp, that’s what we tried to say. She just gave us a pitying look. How hard it was for her to talk to such unenlightened people.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@Anyway:
Why do retired politicians write books? I imagine it makes sense in the context of the whole Master Class she’s doing, which I won’t watch. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s in her book, which I haven’t read but may some day. I think the better question is why a young writer with a prominent platform feel the need to sneer at HRC for doing a Master Class, and somehow tie it to the student debt she incurred pursuing a post-graduate degree at IIRC the University of London.
schrodingers_cat
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Unfortunately, she is not the only one, there seems to be an entire army of them on Twitter. Ostensibly on the left but who hate the Ds more than they hate the Rs.
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus: @Steve in the ATL:
It’s clear you guys have self-esteem issues; I’m sure we can help with that. :-)
Jim, Foolish Literalist
meanwhile, the coup had tentacles I’d never have dreamt of….
Edmund Dantes
@WaterGirl: yes. The stay was denied. It’s early so omens got confused stil early in morning lack of coffee.
No stay was granted. So law is in effect. Which is bullshit. As Sotomayor pointed out in her dissent.
edit – there were multiple stays involved too. So no stay was granted for the ones trying to get it overturned.
JPL
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: OMG
lowtechcyclist
Apparently this includes the Today show.
TODAY on Twitter: “Hillary Clinton reads parts of the victory speech she hoped to deliver in 2016 https://t.co/E4oCGx8G89” / Twitter
Betty Cracker
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Jeebus. What a piece of shit.
Joe Falco
@Jim, Foolish Literalist:
Just shades of the Brooks Brothers riot but worse as an ongoing event.
lowtechcyclist
@JPL:
Reminds me that, from back in the “U.S. out of Central America” days, I have a satirical “U.S. out of North America” button.
Omnes Omnibus
@Edmund Dantes: No, I was correct, but, given the procedural posture of the case, it means the law remains in effect. I may not have been clear about the meaning of the stay.
burnspbesq
As a practical matter, there is no right to abortion in Texas. That much hasn’t changed.
lowtechcyclist
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: I am so fucking pissed at all these people who feel it’s just fine to punch down on ordinary people doing ordinary but necessary jobs – local election officials, county health workers, school board members, teachers, nurses – and dox them and turn their lives into a living hell of threats of murder and violence.
If the states won’t crack down on this shit, the Federal government needs to step in, big time.
zhena gogolia
@WaterGirl: OT, I got an e-mail saying my calendars have shipped. Thanks for checking up for me.
brendancalling
@schrodingers_cat: Now that I live in Vermont, I like to ask those folks why, if Bernie’s so great, his state is such a shambles. Broadband is hard to come by, cell service is spotty at best, there’s a housing crisis, massive income inequality, and despite all the protests in Burlington, it’s pretty fuckin’ racist up here.
JPL
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: Maybe the legal eagles will weigh in on whether or not she can sue West.
Betty Cracker
@lowtechcyclist: Maybe a judge can appoint Britney’s dad as a “conservator” to Mr. West.
hueyplong
@lowtechcyclist: I’m very proud of these election workers who did not break under pressure that I’m not 100% sure I’d withstand.
The word “patriot” has really been misapplied in our time.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
@hueyplong:
Hear hear!
JPL
@Jim, Foolish Literalist: The Washington Post has more to the story. link
Betty
@JPL: Sotomayor is a voice in the wilderness. Where were the other two?
Baud
@Betty: They joined her dissent.
schrodingers_cat
@brendancalling: Bernie white flighted himself to Vermont when NYC started getting more diverse. Just saying black and brown 500 times per speech doesn’t absolve him of his shitty xenophobic anti-immigrant voting record of two decades and counting.
He fits in well with the demographic.
Baud
@brendancalling: I blame Ben & Jerry.
Omnes Omnibus
@Betty: Oh ffs. They signed on to her opinion. That means they agreed with what she said and did not feel a need to say more. It is actually less forceful if everyone feels they need to say their piece.
Jim, Foolish Literalist
thinking back to the Eschaton comments threads in 2009 when it was an article of faith that the secretly pro-life Sotomayor’s nomination was part of crypto-Republican misogynist Obama’s plot to… something.
along those lines, I’ll be taking Laurence Tribe’s occasional foray’s into the Do Something caucus with an even larger grain of salt in the future
Baud
@JPL:
Baud
@Jim, Foolish Literalist:
I’ve come to the conclusion that everyone not on Balloon Juice sucks.
Betty
@Omnes Omnibus: M bad!
schrodingers_cat
OT I got more drawing materials for myself. Some sketch pads, charcoal for sketching and blending materials.
zhena gogolia
@Baud: Me too!
Baud
@schrodingers_cat:
?
NotMax
Open Thread?
prostratedragon
The police body cam video of their talk in the station is quite something. Sinister MFs.
raven
@NotMax: Man, we have watched two episodes of Dopesick, nasty mofo’s
WaterGirl
@Edmund Dantes: Yeah, I am starting to realize that the stay on the stay was upheld.
Brantl
@James E Powell: Now the second time you’re rebuked.
WaterGirl
@zhena gogolia: Great!
I just checked, and all the pending orders now are calendars that were ordered on Wednesday 12/8 or later.
Brantl
@Mike in NC: In a GOOD world, they would have dropped dead before any of us had ever heard of them.
NotMax
FYI, Biden scheduled to appear (via remote hook-up) on the Tonight Show this evening.
(Put this in the wrong thread earlier.)
James E Powell
@Brantl:
I stand corrected.
Ksmiami
@lowtechcyclist: can’t we just do the same to them… if there’s no help from feds
Ksmiami
@Omnes Omnibus: and you still think our legal system works… riiiight? Time to get rid of the Supreme Court
cwmoss
@lowtechcyclist: Virtually all the competent psychotherapists are booked solid in my city with 2 million in the metro area (PDX). Not a good time for people who don’t already have a therapist to have a mental health crisis.
MazeDancer
@Anyway:
1. Pay day
MasterClass pays. Even if she gives it to charity, she gets paid.
2. Comment free environment.
Doesn’t have to get trolled.
BTW, MasterClass is terrible. BoringBasicClass is more like it. Episodes are well shot, well lit, and very slow and boring.
And giving Cornell West time in the spotlight is disgusting.
lowtechcyclist
@Ksmiami:
How, exactly? How do we, as private citizens, find out who they are? If someone phones a death threat to one of these minor officials, how can we trace where the call came from?
Also, there’s the imbalance in numbers. For every such person being harassed and threatened, there are dozens or more doing the harassing and threatening. The people being harassed are public officials, so their identities are known. But they’re minor public officials, without resources to fight back, and they (and we) would find it difficult to impossible to identify their antagonists and retaliate.
It takes a government to track down the members of the mob and bring them to justice.
Ksmiami
@lowtechcyclist: I mean start harassing patriot boys etc
sab
@Ksmiami: We either have a legal legal system, or we have chaos and local warfare. You think Lebanon is better? My Lebannese refugee neighbors beg to differ. I don’t want to speak for them, but I bet the Congolese refugees also beg to differ.
You are either a paid troll or a completley ignorant fucking idiot. Have you ever even talked to anyone who came from a violently torn apart country
ETA The whole point of rule of law is to avoid chaotic partisan fighting. Jeezus fuck. Does no one read history anymore?
debbie
Is there a list anywhere of the defendants who were dismissed? I’m wondering if the dismissed include the OH AG who seems to be horning in on a lot of cases (I think to increase his political visibility).
debbie
@debbie:
Found it here. I see Paxton is among the dismissed. Yay! Not only that, among the dismissed, he’s the only one who “must” be dismissed; the others name are all “should” be dismissed.