• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

If America since Jan 2025 hasn’t broken your heart, you haven’t loved her enough.

Republicans do not pay their debts.

Mediocre white men think RFK Jr’s pathetic midlife crisis is inspirational. The bar is set so low for them, it’s subterranean.

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

The desire to stay informed is directly at odds with the need to not be constantly enraged.

Marge, god is saying you’re stupid.

This chaos was totally avoidable.

When we show up, we win.

the 10% who apparently lack object permanence

Nancy smash is sick of your bullshit.

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Dear elected officials: Trump is temporary, dishonor is forever.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Oppose, oppose, oppose. do not congratulate. this is not business as usual.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

The republican speaker is a slippery little devil.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Deductibles and distribution

Deductibles and distribution

by David Anderson|  November 3, 20178:33 am| 9 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Within the ACA, plans are grouped into metal bands.  Those bands have a target actuarial value with a band of allowed variance around that target.  After a plan shows that it meets the allowed actuarial value without going the maximum out of pocket limit nor violating the non-cost sharing preventative services restriction, insurers are allowed to design their plans however they want.

There is wide variation in plan design.  There are three cost sharing components.  Deductibles are what the patient pays before the insurer will do more.  Deductibles may apply to all services or only some services.  Co-pays are fixed amounts that the patient pays for a given service.  Co-insurance is a percentage that the patient pays.  Once the total out of pocket spend meets the plan’s maximum out of pocket, the insurance company is on the hook for all claims above that limit.

Insurers can choose their plan designs and those choices have significant distributional impacts:

Deductible plans favor the sickest people as the low utilizers pay for almost all of their care via deductible cash. That means the proportion of the pool’s individual responsibility amount is borne by healthy people.

Co-pay only plans favor people who use highly concentrated cost services. A co-pay does not differentiate between a specialist visit with a contract expense of $200 and a specialist visit with a contract expense of $600. It is the same fee. So people who use very costly services but only rarely are best off. People who use a lot of fairly low costs services on a regular basis pay more proportionally.

Co-insurance only plans favor low cost utilizers. They are not paying full price via their deductible, and unlike co-pays, the individual cost per unit matters.

I was talking with a colleague about insurance in North Carolina earlier this week. There are 33 plans being sold on the Exchange. Twenty-seven of the plans have a maximum out of pocket expense (Max OOP) of $7,350.  I expected to see that type of Max OOP for Catastrophic and Bronze plans. I would not have been surprised to see that Max OOP for Silver plans but I was surprised to see a $7,350 Max OOP for a Gold Plan.  The lowest Max OOP was $6,650 for a Bronze plan where the entire cost sharing was the deductible.

We looked into the plans and saw that the deductible got lower as the AV increased as well as co-pays and co-insurance.  The max-OOP translated to different levels of spending.  The Bronze Plan Max-OOP was $6,650 before the insurer paid everything the Gold plan only paid some of the claims to just over $40,000 before the insurer had to pay everything.  It is mainly a risk distribution bet on actuarial value as people who have a $10,000 claim are much better off in Gold than Bronze.

But as part of that discussion, I got curious about how much weight the deductible bears in cost sharing across the country.  I used the Landscape PUF to calculate a rough metric: Individual Medical Deductible/Individual Medical Maximum Out of Pocket.  If the quotient is 1, the deductible does all of the cost sharing.  If the quotient is 0 there is no deductible.  The Gold plan I mentioned above has a quotient of .17.

I’m seeing a few things. There is wild variance in plan design. Silver is all over the place. Zero dollar deductible plans are possible with Silver, Gold and Platinum.  Low deductible plans are fairly common for those metal plans.  They make up their cost sharing by co-pays and co-insurance.  I need to go back over time and calculate this quotient in previous years before I can make strong statements.  Right now it looks like plans of Silver/Gold/Platinum are being designed more often than not to look or actually be more attractive to healthier individuals.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Things I Did Not Know: Mercer-nary Objectives?
Next Post: Day By Day »

Reader Interactions

9Comments

  1. 1.

    Butch

    November 3, 2017 at 8:57 am

    David, since it looks likely I’m about to join the “gig” economy, I was talking yesterday with an insurance agent about health insurance and she mentioned some policies that cover accidents and hospitalization only, which are really my main concerns at this point. Are you familiar at all? They’re much cheaper but I’m afraid it could be a false economy.

  2. 2.

    Ridnik Chrome

    November 3, 2017 at 9:50 am

    Within the ACA, plans are grouped into metal bands.

    You can have the Black Sabbath plan, the Judas Priest plan, or the Def Leppard plan. But if you live in a Tea Party state, you get the Cannibal Corpse plan.

    (ETA: Sorry, I couldn’t resist.)

  3. 3.

    father pusbucket

    November 3, 2017 at 9:55 am

    Thanks, David! Please add the usual tag to this great article (maybe start an “open enrollment 2017” one?).

  4. 4.

    David Anderson

    November 3, 2017 at 10:02 am

    @Butch: By extremely careful. Read through the fine print 3x as they don’t cover much and the coverage might be ($500/night in the hospital) or something like that.

  5. 5.

    Butch

    November 3, 2017 at 10:17 am

    Thanks, David. Last year’s income puts us above the threshold for any support, and we’re probably looking at around $1,400 a month for some really minimal coverage (I’m in a rural area); that’ll be tough on uncertain income, so I was looking for alternatives, but I don’t think this accident-only policy is it.

  6. 6.

    Amir Khalid

    November 3, 2017 at 10:46 am

    @Ridnik Chrome:
    Is the Motley Crue plan any good?

  7. 7.

    Butch

    November 3, 2017 at 10:54 am

    @Amir Khalid: Not since about 1995.

  8. 8.

    Brad Flansbaum

    November 3, 2017 at 12:53 pm

    David
    First, great work. Two questions:

    1) A well functioning RA system would ameliorate the exercise of gaming the payment design of plans. We are not there. But if we were, the games MCOs play would be minimal and you would not need to post on above, correct?
    2) “Co-pay only plans favor people who use highly concentrated cost services.” Be more specific if you could. Highly concentrated can mean an NP visit every week versus a high ticket specialist and associated service requiring more copays. Its the copay cost ($10 vs $75), not the copay itself.

    THanks
    Brad

  9. 9.

    David Anderson

    November 3, 2017 at 1:16 pm

    @Brad Flansbaum:

    1)Assuming perfect Risk Adjustment, there would still be plan design variations but I would be writing far less. And these games are not just MCO games, they are being structured by every type of insurer.

    2) Let’s imagine that Person X with two claims scenarios.

    Scenario A: Single claim for the year. It is a $500 specialist visit.

    Plan 1 has a $800 deductible — Person X pays $500
    Plan 2 has a 50% Coinsurance — Person X pays $250
    Plan 3 has a $100 co-pay — person X pays $200

    Now Scenario B has two claims for the year. Both are $250 specialist visits for total spend of $500
    Plan 1 has a $800 deductible — Person X pays $500
    Plan 2 has a 50% Coinsurance — Person X pays $250
    Plan 3 has a $100 co-pay, Person X pays $100 each time for a total of $200

    There will always be edge cases but in general co-pay only cost-sharing is best for people who don’t use much but use very expensive services as the percentage of total personal costs covered by the co-pay is lower compared to someone who has frequent claims of less expensive services as this second individual gets dinged every visit and the total percentage of costs covered by the insurer goes down.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Paul in Jacksonville - Sunrise, Sunset Redux 6
Photo by Paul in Jacksonville (3/9/26)

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Recent Comments

  • Suzanne on The Politics of AI (Mar 10, 2026 @ 2:31pm)
  • frosty on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Mar 10, 2026 @ 2:30pm)
  • Tim C. on The Politics of AI (Mar 10, 2026 @ 2:30pm)
  • MattF on The Politics of AI (Mar 10, 2026 @ 2:29pm)
  • WTFGhost on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Mar 10, 2026 @ 2:27pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!