• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

This blog will pay for itself.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Republicans don’t trust women.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

He really is that stupid.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

I was promised a recession.

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

When do we start airlifting the women and children out of Texas?

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

Today’s GOP: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Republicans choose power over democracy, every day.

There are consequences to being an arrogant, sullen prick.

Take hopelessness and turn it into resilience.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Thanks for reminding me that Van Jones needs to be slapped.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable VA House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Media / All The News That is Fit To Spin

All The News That is Fit To Spin

by John Cole|  March 25, 200310:45 pm| 16 Comments

This post is in: Media

FacebookTweetEmail

Check out the latest NYT/CBS Poll regarding the war in Iraq. Here are two graphics from the CBS website that I thought you might find interesting.


bias1.jpg


Bias.jpg


Notice anything weird? Look again. Notice anything funny in the graph in the second image? The size of the bar for 63% compared to the size of the bar for 66%?

Yep- typical for the NY Times, typical for the Dan Rather crowd. When the numbers don’t go your way- just make it look like they are going your way. We know you don’t want this war guys (not that anyone really does), but try to shoot straight with us. Pretty Please?

Lazy, incompetent hacks. They really do think no one is paying attention. And before 9 million people write to say this is not bias, I will agree with you it may not be intentional bias- but it is most certainly misleading and biased- and why does it never happen in the other direction? How many coincidences like this do we have to point out before people will finally question whether there may be an agenda?

While you are at it, go check out the NYT Op-Ed about the poll numbers:

While 82 percent of whites said the United States should take military action to oust Mr. Hussein, just 44 percent of blacks said they supported that approach. In addition, 71 percent of whites said they were proud of what the United States was doing in Iraq, compared with 33 percent of blacks.

We were that close to the fabled “World Ending Tomorrow- Minorities and Women Hit Hardest”

*** Update ***

According to Mike at Cold Fury, the website has made the correction, and didn’t bother to tell anyone or explain why it had been wrong in the first place.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Just Out of Curiosity…
Next Post: Message From Dad »

Reader Interactions

16Comments

  1. 1.

    CleverNameHere

    March 25, 2003 at 10:57 pm

    You wanna know something ever more ridiculous? Compare “Removing Saddam Hussein Worth the Cost” again. Look at Monday – 63%, then look at Thursday-Friday 62%.

    Maybe it’s the new math, but I always thought that 63% was GREATER than 62%.

  2. 2.

    Ranck and File

    March 25, 2003 at 11:00 pm

    Also, note that 62% for Thurs.-Fri. is bigger than 63% for 63% for the Monday figure in the second graphic,,,,NYT math!

  3. 3.

    Ranck and File

    March 25, 2003 at 11:01 pm

    Whoops…didn’t see that somebody already pointed that out!

  4. 4.

    Barney Gumble

    March 26, 2003 at 12:50 am

    I looked at the source code, here is the relevant portion:
    REMOVING SADDAM HUSSEIN WORTH THE COST?

    Yes:
    Monday
    img src=”/common/images/blue.gif” width=”64″ height=”10″> 63%
    Sunday
    img src=”/common/images/blue.gif” width=”132″ height=”10″> 66%
    >Saturday
    img src=”/common/images/blue.gif” width=”132″ height=”10″> 66%

    it looks like someone typed 64 when they should have typed 126. Hardly a conspiracy rising to the level of the Trilateral Commission.

    (I had to alter some of the tags to get them to show of legibly–check it out yourself by going to the page then clicking on “View” then “Source”)

  5. 5.

    John Cole

    March 26, 2003 at 12:55 am

    Good thinking, Barney- It is just the sheer laziness of it that disgusts me- and it is always in a certain polticial direction- go figure.

  6. 6.

    David Gillies

    March 26, 2003 at 1:59 am

    How the fuck do you mean to type ‘126’ and end up typing ’64’? That’s like meaning to type ‘euhemeristic’ and accidentally typing ‘boustrophedon’.

  7. 7.

    mike the analyst

    March 26, 2003 at 8:58 am

    Another fact that I thought was VERRRY interesting about this poll is that although “optimism” about the war is declining – support for the war is going up!

    BTW, thanks to Tacitus for the link here!

  8. 8.

    mike the analyst

    March 26, 2003 at 9:06 am

    Actually, a correction. My above statement was based on polls before Monday.

    CBS News Poll
    Regarding the war with Iraq, which of the following do you think is most likely: a fairly quick and successful effort, or a long and costly involvement?
    3/20 – 62% said quick, successful
    3/23 – only 53%

    However…
    Do you approve or disapprove of the United States taking military action against Iraq to try to remove Saddam Hussein from power?
    3/20 – 76% said yes
    3/23 – 80% said yes.

    However these numbers changed on 3/24 – after the lousy day we had in the war on Sunday.
    (Numbers courtesy of the Polling Report.)

  9. 9.

    Bryant

    March 26, 2003 at 11:56 am

    It’s fixed, btw. No correction posted.

    CNN does this kind of thing too. See my complaint here, which relates back to an earlier CNN article alteration — that time they bought into the claims that Blix didn’t say anything about drones in his oral report.

    Mind you, that “error” was in favor of the right…

    (It’s pretty human to notice the things that piss you off and let the rest of it slide. Not consciously, either. It just happens. I don’t get half as torqued at the blowhards in Daily KOS’s comments as I should, for example.)

    Anyhow, pardon the brief partisan comment — I think what both the right and the left should be concerned about is the growing tendency to alter Web articles without any acknowledgement. CNN does it all the time. CBS/NYT did it here. You can’t get away with this in print, because the evidence is always there — but you can sure get away with it on the Web, and everyone does, all the time. It’s shockingly common. It benefits both the right and the left.

    How do we get them to stop?

  10. 10.

    John Cole

    March 26, 2003 at 12:52 pm

    I don’t know Bryant, but it is annoying and dishonest.

    I think most of the bias in the media is a direct result of laziness, sloppiness, and shoddy think- which leads to half-assed work like what I pointed out here. Doctors get sued for malpractice when they behave like this, while this sort of crap almost guarantees you an opinion column at the NY Times.

  11. 11.

    MommaBear

    March 26, 2003 at 7:16 pm

    Do you really think they give a bloody flippin’ finger what the readership thinks; they know what’s best for everyone, and ain’t to proud to lie to achieve what they want.

  12. 12.

    Mike

    March 28, 2003 at 8:38 am

    In reference to someone mistyping the code, I doubt they’re using a raw-code editor for the NYT website. They’d either have some sort of content-management system or a WYSIWYG editor like Dreamweaver or GoLive, either of which would put in the image size automatically. If somebody’s sitting there pecking out raw code all day, god, do I pity them.

  13. 13.

    gerald warnock

    April 28, 2004 at 7:16 pm

    how can anyone at cbs walk straight…with all that spinning?

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Dailypundit says:
    March 25, 2003 at 10:51 pm

    Picture Perfect

    John Cole exhibits graphic proof that the partisan hacks at the New York Times are not only partisan, and hacks, but stupid as hell also.

  2. The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler says:
    March 26, 2003 at 8:13 am

    Stupid, Incompetent Hacks

    Our BlogFather, John Cole, uncovers a nice little piece of incredibly stupid and badly concealed bias in the media. Sheesh,

  3. Cold Fury says:
    March 26, 2003 at 11:19 am

    Why, how can this be?

    John Cole has a must-see graph illustrating the NYT’s bias. My “no surprises here” line is becoming a bit of…

Primary Sidebar

VA Purple House Delegates

Donate

Political Action

Postcard Writing Information

Recent Comments

  • catclub on Tuesday Evening Open Thread: SBF On Trial — Update (Oct 3, 2023 @ 11:46pm)
  • Enhanced Voting Techniques on Ask Me. Go Ahead and Ask Me (Oct 3, 2023 @ 11:45pm)
  • HumboldtBlue on Tuesday Evening Open Thread: SBF On Trial — Update (Oct 3, 2023 @ 11:45pm)
  • C Stars on Tuesday Evening Open Thread: SBF On Trial — Update (Oct 3, 2023 @ 11:44pm)
  • wjca on Tuesday Evening Open Thread: SBF On Trial — Update (Oct 3, 2023 @ 11:44pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
What Has Biden Done for You Lately?

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Cole & Friends Learn Español

Introductory Post
Cole & Friends Learn Español

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!