It’s Day 4 of the actual trial! Day 8, if you include jury selection.
Best sources of live blogging that I have found. Court resumes at 9:30 am.
Anna Bower at Lawfare – Live Blogging on Twitter
Josh Kovensky at TPM – Live Blogging (no live blogging at TPM today)
Mark Sumner at Daily Kos – Live Blogging (no live blogging at Daily Kos today)
TRANSCRIPTS OF NY CASES AVAILABLE THE NEXT DAY Link
Emotional support pup and kitty for the occasion.
I’m still interested in the trial, so I’ll put this up again today, but think of it as a general open thread, too.
Quantum man
Why is the Supreme Court helping Trump?
WaterGirl
@Quantum man: Why is the Supreme Court helping Trump?
Because they are corrupt, that’s way. And apparently they don’t care who knows it.
Dorothy A. Winsor
@Quantum man: Because they can. They don’t believe anyone can stop them. And they’re right.
NotMax
Tomorrow’s headline today:
Defense Attorneys Squeeze Pecker, Who Stands Firm
Omnes Omnibus
Reposted from below: I would offer a couple of caveats about yesterday’s Court hearing. One, you can’t always tell how a case is going to turn out from the oral arguments. Two, most hot takes, even those of experts, are crap.
Frank Wilhoit
@Omnes Omnibus: The horror of yesterday’s oral arguments is sufficient unto itself and does not depend upon the ultimate decision.
Omnes Omnibus
@Frank Wilhoit: Many oral arguments are shit shows. At all appellate levels. Some are boring because the judges have all the info they need in the briefs and the hearing is effectively pro forma. Others are contentious because the judges have all the info they need in the briefs so they entertain themselves by hazing counsel. Sometimes, they actually have a point or two that they want to explore. Sometimes they feature a jurist expressing his almost sexual need to have an American Franco.
narya
@Omnes Omnibus: I appreciate you reminding me/us of this. I was still horrified by the whole thing, especially in a week that included the EMTALA arguments.
hueyplong
@Omnes Omnibus: The term “hot take” has in fact become synonymous with “crap.” The English language, like Nature, finds a way.
Weapon X
@NotMax:
Assault on Pecker Leads to Multiple Outbursts
Film at 11
schrodingers_cat
@Omnes Omnibus: Your caveat will fall on deaf ears. Maximum poutrage, hyperbole and doomerism will rule the day.
Omnes Omnibus
@narya: Note: I am not saying they won’t do something horrible. Given the make up of the Court that is always a possibility.
Betty Cracker
@Omnes Omnibus: True, but I’ll offer another caveat: you don’t have to be a doomer, pessimist, enemy of hope, etc., to find that hearing alarming as hell. At the very least the corrupt court seems determined to help Trump run out the clock.
NotMax
@Steeplejack
As opposed to a Franco-American.
(couldn’t resist) :)
eclare
@Omnes Omnibus:
I guess I’m an idiot, Franco?
Baud
I for one am looking forward to absolute presidential immunity.
schrodingers_cat
This court has been bought and paid for by the Federalist Society. It is another arm of the Republican hydra. My expectations from them are low. I expect the worst from them
There is really no point in melting into a puddle everytime they do something awful. I was under no illusions that Alito would be terrible right when he was confirmed. JGC was more upset at Kennedy’s questioning during the hearings.
The only solution to Republican induced mayhem is to vote D and convince anyone who will listen to vote D. Something our blogfather eventually learned thank God.
TBone
@Omnes Omnibus: 😆
SiubhanDuinne
@eclare:
Generalissimo Franco.
He is still dead.
TBone
@Baud: 💙
NotMax
@Betty Cracker
Whatever the outcome (am expecting 6-3, although not totally ruling out 7-2) the narrowness of the decision will slice the ham so thin you could read a phone book through it.
Cacti
Spoiler:
He won’t be convicted. It only takes one cultist for a hung jury.
The US criminal justice system exists to protect the powerful, not hold them accountable. That’s for the rest of us little people.
Mr. Bemused Senior
You are too quick for me, @SiubhanDuinne
[SNL]
hueyplong
@Baud: Yes, as a matter of common sense you’d think that this corrupt court would hesitate to deliver totalitarian powers to Dark Brandon.
If they did, he could have them shot the next day, and you could fashion an argument that he probably should.
eclare
@SiubhanDuinne:
Thank you!
schrodingers_cat
@Baud: What would be your first EO?
NotMax
@Baud
Would you maybe settle for an Absolut Train Wreck?
:)
TBone
In case you missed Senator Whitehouse last night on with Lawrence O’Donnell
https://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/-high-priest-of-policy-sen-whitehouse-slams-pompous-gorsuch-on-trump-immunity-209743429644
Every time he says “what the facts” I hear “WTF” 😆
Ken
I had a sudden flashback to 1999/2000 and the arguments about when the century ends….
SiubhanDuinne
@Mr. Bemused Senior:
Congrats on finding the SNL clip so quickly, though! I didn’t even try.
WaterGirl
@schrodingers_cat: That’s just not true on BJ. Some
boomersDOOMERS for sure, but may are not.Maybe just call out the
boomersDOOMERS with that. But not all of us!Way too broad a brush.
edit: fucking autocorrect!
LAO
Anyone else enjoying the fact that Howard Stern landed a one on one interview with President Biden? Heads are exploding at the NYT.
Omnes Omnibus
@WaterGirl: Boomers?
Ruviana
@WaterGirl: I didn’t see a boomer reference. Maybe a doomer? A whole different animal.
Elizabelle
@LAO: Howard can be a very astute interviewer, and is likely smarter and more principled than any of the trained monkeys on the FTF NY Times political desk.
Incredible chance for outreach.
schrodingers_cat
@WaterGirl:
Not everyone here for sure, but way too many IMHO. As they say on Twitter, if it doesn’t apply let it fly.
I don’t necessarily thinks its only the boomers.
FPer whose mantra is Hope is not a strategy is not a boomer.
Layer8Problem
@eclare: There have been quite a number of conservatives, many of the traditionalist Catholic persuasion, who regard Francisco Franco’s Falangist Spain as a terrific example of how to run a government. William F. Buckley back in the day certainly did. Leonard Leo’s Federalist Society people and the Opus Dei wing of our Supreme Court continue the fight for putting God and hard repression where they think it should be.
Kay
@LAO:
Oh, I’m glad. I was hoping he would go around them. I don’t know a thing about Howard Stern but I like him for defending “wokeness” (tolerance for diversity) when the whole pack of media/comic ninnies were all attacking it. Seems like he doesn’t follow the crowd.
trollhattan
@Baud: Make it soon.
Handsome Brandon removes three SCOTUS justices, seven senators, twenty congresscritters.
Progress!
PAM Dirac
@hueyplong:
I think it will be pretty easy for this court. The immunity is only for official acts. In the incredibly wise and final view of the court, anything done by a D president is not an official act, while anything done by the proper R president is an official act.
Jackie
@WaterGirl: Leave this Boomer out of it🤪
trollhattan
@Kay:
There are clips of Trump and Stern discussing Ivanka’s hotness during one of many Trump appearances on his show. So potential irony interview seems equal parts awesome and risky.
As shoving it under the NYT’s nose while sternly (heh) commanding “BAD dog” it’s frickin’ awesome. New Yorkers will get it.
Anyway
@Kay: Howard is a good interviewer and not reflexively anti-Dem as many of the lamestream media journamalists. Will definitely check it out.
Anoniminous
@SiubhanDuinne:
Asertation of fact not in evidence.
Has anyone dug him up and poked him recently?
lowtechcyclist
The Hill’s summary:
NotMax
@trollhattan
Reach across the aisle to offer the olive branch of a submarine tour of the Titanic?
//
Kay
@trollhattan:
Oh, no. But we knew Donald Trump was gross and hateful about 1. women, 2. his daughter. I don’t think I have to worry about Biden doing that. I’m just glad there’s someone other around besides Joe Rogan – the new Rush Limbaugh.
It’s just really refreshing to read someone say “I’m woke- what of it?” A TRULY bold opinion.
WaterGirl
@Omnes Omnibus: @Ruviana: @schrodingers_cat: @Jackie: DOOMERS!
Fucking autocorrect.
edit: I posted my comment, then ate my breakfast. So I didn’t catch the autocorrect until breakfast was over.
edit 2: No one on BJ has ever heard me refer to any age group, gen z, gen x, boomers, etc. Unless I was pushing back on someone else. I hate phrasing that paints with too broad a brush, and I absolutely hate the whole BOOMER thing.
Jackie
An aside; apparently TIFG spend his campaign day (Wed) playing golf. And, instead of campaigning this weekend, he’s holding a birthday party bash for Mrs TIFG.
Maybe the rumors that his lawyers don’t want him campaigning – and quite possibly breaking his Gag orders – is true!
WaterGirl
@LAO: Boy, that’s a big FU if I ever saw one!
That’s the Irish in our guy, Joe.
schrodingers_cat
@WaterGirl: Don’t worry about it.
Ken
“Pour encourager les autres” would IMO be a pretty good argument.
If shooting them seems too extreme, I would also accept immuring them in a cell and continuously playing the “Devil Speech” from A Man For All Seasons.
JPL
@lowtechcyclist: Nice! Maybe there is always good news after all.
Scout211
This makes me smile: NBC
WaterGirl
@JPL: There is always good news, but quite possibly not as readily available, aka in the mainstream, as the bad news. :-)
Ocotillo
@hueyplong: Ah but that is why this needs to stretch out. If Biden wins, no absolute immunity. If Trump wins, immunity absolutely.
Soprano2
@LAO: The Politico story was mentioned on the news roundup on 1A this morning, as was the Stern interview. Unfortunately, their incompetent staff didn’t have a Facebook post up for today’s show; I sure would have had some comments for them.
Soprano2
Anyone else think they’re sticking the knife in and twisting it a little with this comment?
Kay
@Soprano2:
If they really want to stick it to the NYTimes do local media interviews in swing states. Do urban papers in PA, GA, NC, MI, WI, AZ and FL. Philadelphia is nice and close. Pittsburgh. Scranton! I would do Scranton.
Then they can be “what – not GOOD ENOUGH for the NYTimes? America’s LOCAL journalists are BAD?”
Baud
@LAO:
Awesome. His interview with Hillary was amazing, and I’m not a Stern fan.
rikyrah
Olivia Nuzzi (@Olivianuzzi) posted at 2:42 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Relatedly, over the last six months or so at Right Wing political events, I have noticed that assassination comes up more and more. Conservative influencers are telling their audience to expect and prepare for violence in 2024.
(https://x.com/Olivianuzzi/status/1783582372270878885?t=3zj3exAT3MIW3717XR-ZCg&s=03)
Melancholy Jaques
@Omnes Omnibus:
When people have nothing else to go on, they go on what they’ve got. It’s harmless.
rikyrah
Jeffrey Toobin (@JeffreyToobin) posted at 11:13 AM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Kavanaugh, Alito and Gorsuch have also said they don’t want to talk about the Trump case, they just want to talk about the principles in the case. It’s a way of saying they want to rule for Trump while saying it’s just about the principles.
(https://x.com/JeffreyToobin/status/1783529669943259477?t=-IJ9Vmj9YaGtpT3sbVleDQ&s=03)
rikyrah
Dr. Marina Archer (@DrMarinaArcher) posted at 6:12 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
This was foreseen by the way they “crafted” the paragraph when they took up the case.
The wording of it gave it away back then – it is legal sophistry, and they know it. These are bad faith actors. https://t.co/qx3yOMQeU7
(https://x.com/DrMarinaArcher/status/1783635154793275507?t=cLfCRhfb43Ta19FArVAzAA&s=03)
Melancholy Jaques
@rikyrah:
Like all those abstract, well-established principles that led an earlier court to appoint George W Bush president.
Baud
@Kay:
Biden should do an interview with a grade school newsletter.
Soprano2
@Kay: Oh ITA, that’s a much better way to meet the voters he needs to win over than giving an interview to the NY Times where the first dozen questions would probably be variations of “are you too old to be president?” and “how concerned are you about your son Hunter?” You will never convince me that 95% of the concerns about his age are actually worries that Harris will become president – they all act like TFG would become president if something happened to Biden. I wish they would be honest about what their true concerns are.
hueyplong
@Baud: Does the original Tiger Beat still exist? If so, no-brainer.
Baud
@Soprano2:
The coup de grace will be his exclusive interview with Ohio Diner Magazine.
rikyrah
Adam Carlson (@admcrlsn) posted at 3:53 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
I’ve read a fair amount of replies to the Politico story from NYT reporters, and to me they’ve only reinforced:
1) How out of touch they are — only journalists care about how many interviews he’s done
2) How special they think NYT is — unable to handle any criticism whatsoever
(https://x.com/admcrlsn/status/1783600248117497939?t=rM-uagTT5gVS81J9d3d60A&s=03)
lowtechcyclist
@Melancholy Jaques:
Well, mostly harmless. ;-)
hueyplong
@Soprano2: Don’t forget, “How do you intend to restore your foreign policy credentials after the Afghanistan disaster?”
rikyrah
Jason Karsh (@jkarsh) posted at 5:13 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:![]()
The hilarious thing about the NYT stomping its feet and demanding Biden come supplicate before them because it’s their birthright is that Biden is now going to immediately do like a dozen interviews with local reporters and YouTubers and the NYT will just get more furious.
(https://x.com/jkarsh/status/1783620452365283626?t=C4Kh0DaVwxdP0Ti6zDWIvQ&s=03)
Ruckus
@Scout211:
They are trying to inflate trump?
That is one ugly, worse than useless toy balloon.
rikyrah
scary lawyerguy (@scarylawyerguy) posted at 4:26 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Statement does not challenge the idea the paper’s publisher told reporters to focus on Biden’s age as retribution for denying the paper an interview. Instead, it’s a multi-paragraph whine reiterating that they are pissed off Biden didn’t grant said interview.
(https://x.com/scarylawyerguy/status/1783608496304373954?t=vZGCB9J1MOKnFcD_mmI2oQ&s=03)
RaflW
@LAO: I particularly love that the NYT felt forced to do live, item by item coverage of Biden on Stern’s show.
Suck it, AG.
Tidbit: by Zolan Kanno-Youngs
While talking about his younger days with Howard Stern, President Biden just mistakenly said “Trump” when he meant to say “Nixon.” Biden immediately corrects himself and says “excuse me for the Freudian slip.”
rikyrah
Ragnarok Lobster
(@eclecticbrotha) posted at 6:51 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
It should be noted that the New York Times opens this with a condescending insult to pretty much everyone who criticizes the New York times before basically attacking the president because he won’t kiss AG Sulzberger’s ass.
(https://x.com/eclecticbrotha/status/1783644936597876821?t=qKHFw7fvByhroRcU1fqPnw&s=03)
lowtechcyclist
@Ruckus:
And may it share the fate of the Hindenburg.
Baud
@RaflW:
Haha. Biden doesn’t get enough credit for his quips.
Ruckus
@rikyrah:
I like it when less than supreme, supreme court justices feel like screwing the law and being political.
Several wheres there are founding fathers rolling over in their graves.
TBone
Dark Brandon listens to us DFHs as I said yesterday. The man is cool 😎 and knows exactly what he’s doing with his team.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9G6xu-J_Dmc
rikyrah
David Simon (@AoDespair) posted at 0:32 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Yesterday, in offering legalisms that will have women die rather than allow established medical protocols to save them, Alito was disingenuous and evil. Today, as a USSC justice seemingly unaware that an independent DOJ so prosecutes, he’s evil, disingenuous, yet also a cartoon.
(https://x.com/AoDespair/status/1783549691365409071?t=GJv13P1Ip1M0ONAg41kDkA&s=03)
Frank Wilhoit
@Baud: You mean the Ohio Diner Podcast. There couldn’t be a print periodical because its audience can’t read.
rikyrah
Melissa Murray (@ProfMMurray on Threads
) (@ProfMMurray) posted at 0:47 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Prediction: SCOTUS will take a month to write an opinion “for the ages” that remands this back to the district court. With an assist from the SCOTUS be brought into being, the author of The Art of the Deal will have perfected The Art of Delay.
(https://x.com/ProfMMurray/status/1783553328481464660?t=1BKDmVeq-50bwFXHqNVicQ&s=03)
rikyrah
This is outrageous.
Sam Levine (@srl) posted at 11:47 AM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Breaking news: The Tarrant county district attorney says it is appealing ruling that threw out Crystal Mason’s 5 year prison sentence for illegal voting. https://t.co/4mPpkg9cPs
(https://x.com/srl/status/1783538289863021028?t=AAjp-MNywBDjC7KE0aQGZA&s=03)
Soprano2
@hueyplong: Yep, probably a dozen questions like that too.
Ruckus
@Soprano2:
How many of the NYT’s concerns are that they get exactly what they want out of and not what they don’t want out of a president? I’m going with 100%.
Are they about covering the news or making it?
Frank Wilhoit
@TBone:
I understand what you are saying and you are not wrong, but why did it take three years to get out of the gate?
rikyrah
Ragnarok Lobster
(@eclecticbrotha) posted at 3:35 PM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
The Founders built a system of government heavily dependent on the honor of the people elected to positions of power. Once you fill those slots with dishonorable people, the whole system collapses.
(https://x.com/eclecticbrotha/status/1783595740813529322?t=D2uhtYevgj7nqy7uPoL31Q&s=03)
JPL
@lowtechcyclist: His maga crew would still vote for a dead trump, before another republican.
rikyrah
Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) posted at 7:58 AM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Today white christian heterosexual males hold 80% of the positions of power across the fields of business, politics and media. For more than 200 years it was more than 95%. White christian heterosexual males represent less than 30% of the population.
(https://x.com/matthewjdowd/status/1783480699695034794?t=YSk3E1yZI4VpKtUklOngbw&s=03)
TBone
@Frank Wilhoit: timing is everything.
JPL
@rikyrah: fkfkfkfkfkfk Maybe it’s time to let her be.
Baud
@rikyrah:
The panic caused by the 15% loss is the source of most of our problems.
Ruckus
@lowtechcyclist:
Who wants a flaming pile of trump shit anywhere near them?
OK, OK, get off my back it was a rhetorical question…..
opiejeanne
@JPL: That proposal is acceptable.
Fake Irishman
@rikyrah:
Tarrant County is very purple and perhaps tipping blue for national and statewide elections. It’s a few percentage points behind that for local and county offices. Stuff like this accelerates the shift. (Cold comfort right now, but the ground is shifting pretty quickly in that part of north Texas)
hueyplong
@JPL: She’s a right wing chew toy, so they can’t let it go. Setting aside the racism (I know, impossible), letting it go would require an ounce of empathy, which is also totally unacceptable
Hence the well-worn line about the cruelty being the point.
Baud
@hueyplong:
The need someone to counter all the right wingers who were rightfully convicted of voter fraud.
cain
@Jackie: he’s definitely breaking his gag order at that birthday bash. The ‘bash’ is him bashing a lot of people.
ETA #100!
Ruckus
@Baud:
The panic caused by the 15% loss is the source of most of our problems.
Yep.
I see that my concept that this is supposed to be a nation of it’s citizens rather than a nation of the wealthy, white, well off males is actually at least starting to become a reality.
Soprano2
@Baud: True that, they hate the idea that they might have to stand in line for things behind others they believe are less deserving than they are. I’ve always thought the mouthing about the “most qualified” candidates was a huge pile of horseshit. In my life I’ve found it’s rare that there’s an obviously “more qualified” candidate for most things. The deciding factor is usually something like “who am I most comfortable around?”, which is why it’s so hard for others to break into jobs where white men dominate.
JCJ
@Kay: The first time I came across the term “woke” was in an article on a subsite of espn’s website called “The Undefeated”, now known as “andscape”. This was in 2016. It was describing Gregg Popovich, the coach of the San Antonio Spurs, as the most ‘woke’ coach in the NBA. It basically described how Pop became ‘woke’. It was quite complementary. Just looking at the article again it starts off with the Urban Dictionary definition of woke – “Being aware … Knowing what’s going on in the community.”
https://andscape.com/features/san-antonio-spurs-gregg-popovich-is-the-nbas-most-woke-coach/
Mr. Bemused Senior
@Ruckus:
Trump Inflation
wjca
You and he seem to be on the same page.
Only consider how devastating it will be, however, if he is convicted. Devastating for him, for sure. But having your worldview refuted, even if only this once, could be hard on you as well. I hope you get thru it OK.
WaterGirl
@rikyrah: If you’re explaining, you’re losing.
Manyakitty
@schrodingers_cat: every word of this.
Manyakitty
@LAO: it’s perfect. Also, I’d love to see Biden give interviews to the few independent local papers like the Baltimore Banner, etc.
TBone
@wjca: 😎
TBone
In honor of today’s proceedings, I made cool cucumber salad. Slicing that cuke was very satisfying, as is the creamy dill goodness.
zhena gogolia
@LAO: I didn’t see that!
rikyrah
Greg Sargent (@GregTSargent) posted at 11:18 AM on Thu, Apr 25, 2024:
Let’s be clear: If SCOTUS helps Trump delay the 1/6 trial, voters will likely be making their choice in the next election without hearing any of the new evidence Jack Smith has gathered on Trump’s conduct during the violent effort to overturn the last one.
https://t.co/orUSq3OUWD
(https://x.com/GregTSargent/status/1783531085889958065?t=Nbwd52jru2w2-d5L3S_jxQ&s=03)
SiubhanDuinne
@hueyplong:
I was actually thinking of My Weekly Reader.
rikyrah
Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) posted at 8:34 AM on Fri, Apr 26, 2024:
“The Republican discourse around the Arizona charges consists of whining that Dems are engaging in lawfare. But if MAGA had an ounce of self-awareness, they’d recall that Trump filed a staggering 63 cases in an attempt to overturn the election results.” https://t.co/i7esyIdlAB
(https://x.com/atrupar/status/1783852264097984658?t=zTM53T6aAfh74k1pwpjpCQ&s=03)
hueyplong
@rikyrah: Ain’t it something that there are voters who need to see Smith’s case in addition to everything else in order to do the right thing?
One of the Many Jens
@WaterGirl: Hey WaterGirl, I wanted to check in with you on the Four Directions thermometer – I had thought I’d read that the full amount needed to be donated by 4/25 for one of the big angel matches to occur? I hit the 20K for NV last night with a $300-something donation to try and get that. Hope it wasn’t too late. Thanks again for putting these together!
rikyrah
17 GOP-held Biden districts targeted to flip blue (@Needle_of_Arya) posted at 9:48 AM on Fri, Apr 26, 2024:
“I’m committed to the purity and the exact letter of the Constitution!” has never been more of a fatefully terrible lie coming from a white conservative than right now
Jon (@landbutcher) posted at 10:23 AM on Fri, Apr 26, 2024:
Constitutionalists only affirm the parts that serve white supremacy. That document has no value to them outside of that context.
17 GOP-held Biden districts targeted to flip blue (@Needle_of_Arya) posted at 10:25 AM on Fri, Apr 26, 2024:
that first phrase
we are here in part because the Constitution began to be interpreted to be fair to Black people, and the white supremacist opposes this development
(https://x.com/Needle_of_Arya/status/1783880038204485755?t=ATT_hwWINwlEgRfJejRX-A&s=03)
Mr. Bemused Senior
@SiubhanDuinne: Highlights for Children
Frankensteinbeck
@Cacti:
That hasn’t been helping him so far. It’s what I would have expected, but he’s had enough legal troubles by now that it’s doesn’t happen in practice. The system actually does counter that pretty well. Fuck if I know how.
Ruckus
@Mr. Bemused Senior:
The balloon is smarter, and more useful, except that it looks like SFB.
An actual, plain round balloon would look far better.
(And that is exactly the picture I thought it would be)
hueyplong
@Frankensteinbeck: On some criminal conviction that was later the subject of a Trumpian pardon, a MAGAt was on the jury and said she supported Pres. Trump but the evidence was clear.
Maybe it would have been different if the defendant had been Trump himself.
LAO
Does anyone know who the next witness is? Pecker’s on redirect.
SiubhanDuinne
@Mr. Bemused Senior:
Yes!! Loved it, but couldn’t recall the name quickly enough to include in comment. What fun those days were, when the latest editions were distributed!
cmorenc
@rikyrah:
“Whether and to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office…”
Isn’t Roberts hereby assuming that inciting a mob to storm the Capitol and attempting to subvert the electoral college with a fake elector scheme are “official acts” of a President, as opposed to campaigning by electoral subversion? If Trump’s activities around J6 and fake electoral schemes etc. are covered by Presidential immunity, so was Richard Nixon’s acts supporting and covering up the break-in at Watergate actions protected by Presidential immunity.
TBone
@LAO: Hope maybe
Hicks, that is
WaterGirl
@One of the Many Jens: It’s all good, thank you so much!
We have two $1,000 checks from angels who matched with a check rather than donating through the thermometer.
So we did meet our deadline in time, and I SO appreciate the $300 donation to make sure we got there for NV.
If that $300 is more than you would have donated if you had known about the checks, I’m sure you can get a refund from ActBlue.
My double-secrete hope was that we would get to $20k in the thermometers so we could raise $21k for each. So I was super excited to see that we broke $20k in the thermometer, bringing us to $21k for NV!
I always think that it encourages the external matches when the individual who has pledge $20k or $30k sees that we were able to raise a bit more than what they required for them to make their donation.
But again, I’m sure you can request a refund if it was more than you could really afford.
WaterGirl
@LAO: I do not know. The prosecution stood their ground and said they didn’t want to supply witness names because Trump would harass them. (my words, not theirs) Justice Merchan agreed.
Then, the day before the first witness was to be called, they gave the defense Pecker’s name.
I have only seen speculation about who the next witness might be. As far as I know, the prosecution has not announced the name.
Bupalos
@hueyplong: Also maybe not though. I think a lot of people sell a little short the degree to which for most Trumpists, their Trumpism requires a protected and managed information space. If not managed, it can be pierced with facts or different perspectives or can evaporate when the social structure around evaporates.
It doesn’t feel that way to us, because we believe these perspectives and structures are available to these people and that they have a kind of herculean ability to insulate themselves. But something as simple as an unfamiliar context with 11 other strangers and facts parading in front of their face… it can be a very different story. As much as I’m more or less constantly lectured online about how this is absolutely impossible and should never be attempted, I’ve picked spots and helped it happen in “real life” too.
Jackie
@cain:
Maybe. Maybe not. Unless he does a public speech, breaking his gag order, what TIFG says in private… 🤷🏼♀️
hueyplong
@Bupalos: Totally agree.
LAO
@WaterGirl: I was just wondering if I missed it.
For the record (as a practical point) I’m certain the prosecution team released the name to the defense team. I believe this because (1) the defense abided by the prosecution request not to release Pecker’s name or allow Trump to truth about Pecker and (2) it’s the general practice of DANY (that’s what they call themselves).
Jackie
@LAO: I don’t even think TIFG’s attorneys know!😁
LAO
@Jackie: we shall see (I think they do).
Jackie
Apparently, Schiff kept his sense of humor while speaking in his travel apparel 😁
Jackie
I highly doubt Biden is agreeing “under pressure;” he’s been practicing these last few weeks while campaigning, tossing out zingers and rebuttals directly to TIFG’s statements.
I just hope the debate hosts cut TIFG’s mike ASAP when he
attemptsstarts to talk over and interrupt Biden.Baud
@Jackie:
This is why they don’t get interviews. There’s no shift much less a striking one in not committing before you commit. It’s written that way to make Biden seem like his flip flopping on something.
Josie
@rikyrah:
George Conway in an interview on CNN said that it was still possible to have a trial in September and October, even if not a verdict.
Additionally, he said that the worst case scenario was to have the case remanded to Judge Chutkin, in which case she could have a fact finding hearing in July, which would not be the trial we all want, but would at least lay out the evidence for people to see. I felt a little better hearing that,
TBone
👍 so do I
oldgold
The cross, like most cross, was meh and went on too long.
Any damage done, has been healed by the re-direct.
All things considered, Pecker was a good opening witness for the prosecution. He set the table well.
oldgold
@Josie:
If a decision has to be made as to whether to try the DC case or the Florida case in the early autumn of
20232024, I would go with the Florida case.It is the easier case to try and has not already been absorbed into the nation’s political consciousness.
oldgold
This re-direct wiped out the cross:
Wasn’t the contract really aimed at “locking up the Karen McDougal story?” he asked.
“Yes,” Pecker said, later adding that the parts about columns and articles were “included in the contract basically to disguise the actual purpose of it.”
“And what was the actual purpose of it?”
Pecker said it was “to acquire the lifetime rights to her story so it’s not published.”
Josie
@oldgold:
Did you mean 2024? I would agree with you, except for the fact that, in Florida, we are dealing with a biased, incompetent judge and, in D.C., we have the exact opposite.
Xavier
@schrodingers_cat:
@rikyrah: The Constitution gives the federal courts the authority to decide “cases and controversies.” This phrase has consistently been interpreted to preclude opining on principles.
oldgold
Yes, I meant 2024. Although, 2023 would have been nice.
Even given the Judge, if I were Smith, I would prefer to go with the Florida case.
The facts in that case are brutal and easily understood. Yet, except for legal and political junkies are not well known.
In my opinion, the DC case is a legal briar patch.
One of the Many Jens
@WaterGirl: Oh, fantastic. No worries, I just wanted to ensure that we got as much through to 4D as we could! Thanks again!
WaterGirl
@One of the Many Jens: Thank you!
I see that AZ just made it to $20k in the thermometer, too! Big thanks to the four of you who made that happen for AZ!
You know who you are!
Dan B
@rikyrah: It’s outrageous. She was told she could vote and did a provisional ballot. This prosecutor is a stone cold racist, and probably mysoginist as well.
Martin
My sense from the oral arguments yesterday is that there’s going to be a lot of discussion between the justices on this one in terms of what kinds of incentives would various outcomes create.
Nancy
@WaterGirl: That’s about covers it for the majority.
WaterGirl
@Nancy: Yes! I was definitely speaking of the 6 corrupt Justices.
I can only imagine how the remaining 3 ,who actually care about the rule of law, feel. If it’s maddening for us, it must be equally or more maddening to them.
Screw comity – I want blistering dissents if the rulings are as ridiculous and harmful and I suspect they might be.