• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I wonder if trump will be tried as an adult.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Somebody needs to explain to DeSantis that nobody needs to do anything to make him look bad.

If West Virginia and San Francisco had a love child.

In my day, never was longer.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

When the time comes to make an endorsement, the pain of NYT editors will be palpable as they reluctantly whisper “Biden.”

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

I really should read my own blog.

He imagines himself as The Big Bad, Who Is Universally Feared… instead of The Big Jagoff, Who Is Universally Mocked.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

T R E 4 5 O N

It’s not hopeless, and we’re not helpless.

Insiders who complain to politico: please report to the white house office of shut the fuck up.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Second rate reporter says what?

This fight is for everything.

“The defense has a certain level of trust in defendant that the government does not.”

I’m more Christian than these people and I’m an atheist.

These days, even the boring Republicans are nuts.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

Mobile Menu

  • Four Directions Montana
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2024 Elections
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Media / Judge Roberts and the Media Exemption

Judge Roberts and the Media Exemption

by John Cole|  July 21, 20058:36 am| 12 Comments

This post is in: Media, Politics

FacebookTweetEmail

Judge Roberts gets a big thumbs up from Jeff Rosen this morning:

Here is what liberals and conservatives can agree on about John Roberts, President Bush’s first Supreme Court nominee: He is perhaps the most impressive Supreme Court advocate of his generation, extremely intelligent, thoughtful and able – a lawyer’s lawyer. In a reasonable world, that should be enough to assure his confirmation with bipartisan enthusiasm. Unfortunately, Washington politics is anything but reasonable.

Judge Roberts takes pride in representing both sides of the political spectrum. He delighted environmental groups by convincing the Supreme Court that a freeze on development in an unspoiled part of Lake Tahoe didn’t violate the private property rights of the affected landowners. He has argued for and against the constitutionality of affirmative action. For Mr. Roberts, the ability to “argue a case round or argue it flat,” as the lawyers say, is a point of pride.

David Brooks, gushing like a teenage schoolgirl, offers up this sloppy wet kiss:

Roberts nomination, how do I love thee? Let me count the ways.

I love thee with the depth and breadth and height my soul can reach. I love thee freely, as men strive for right. I love thee because this is the way government is supposed to work. President Bush consulted widely, moved beyond the tokenism of identity politics and selected a nominee based on substance, brains, careful judgment and good character.

I love thee because John G. Roberts is the face of today’s governing conservatism.

The Washington Post has this John Yoo guest piece:

Democrats should recognize an olive branch when they see it.

By choosing John G. Roberts to replace Sandra Day O’Connor on the Supreme Court, President Bush came as close as possible to finding a non-ideological, consensus nominee who can also lay claim to being a Republican.

Manuel Miranda in the Opinion Journal yesterday:

Last night George Bush kept his campaign promise that he would name a justice in the mold of Antonin Scalia or Clarence Thomas. And I for one am ashamed that I ever doubted him. I should have understood the president better. In John Roberts, the president got what he wanted, and we conservatives did too…

But for many the day only began anew after the president’s announcement. The telephone companies made a profit last night on conference calls to “introduce” John Roberts to the conservative base. Questions were blunt: “Tell me if this guy is one of us,” demanded one skeptic. “Is he solid?” asked another. But it was not a hard sell. Conservatives around the country went to sleep happy.

The Opinion Journal today:

All in all, Mr. Bush seems to have made a shrewd choice, one that moves the Court back toward the center while denying opponents easy attack lines. The list of the three Democrats who voted against Mr. Roberts in committee for the appeals court–Ted Kennedy, Richard Durbin and Chuck Schumer–tells us who is really in the judicial “mainstream.”

We’ll still get a noisy battle, because the MoveOn.org crowd can’t help themselves, but unless they can dig up some mud we aren’t now aware of, the left is about to discover that losing Presidential elections has judicial consequences.

Now, can someone at the FEC explain to me again why it is that I need to be regulated, but these guys have full free protection? I’ll leave you with the deep thoughts of Paul McLeary, after which, you can try to explain this all to me:

What’s more, campaign finance laws are there for a reason, and it’s a little presumptuous of bloggers to hold themselves above the system. Many partisan bloggers are little more than political activists, and as activists they raise funds for their own pet political causes, something reporters don’t — and can’t — do. In this, they should be included under campaign finance laws.

In the end, it’s a complicated issue, and both sides have salient points. Here’s hoping that the bloggers, the court system and the FEC can arrive at some middle ground where the blogosphere remains a free and open forum for political talk, while limitations on campaign financing are also upheld.

Maybe McLeary can explain this petition from NewsMax and how that is journalism, and not political activism:

NewsMax.com, one of America’s leading online news services, is enabling its readers to petition their US Senators for the appointment of Judge John Roberts to the Supreme Court.

NewsMax will provide your petition to the Senators of your state in digital and print form during the confirmation process.

Already leading Democrats like Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin have condemned the nomination and say they will launch an all out effort to stop the appointment of Judge Roberts.

During this critical period, make sure your voice is heard!

I am sure John McCain and Russ Feingold, with their lackeys at the FEC, can make this all crystal clear.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « More Good News
Next Post: Good Luck, Kathy »

Reader Interactions

12Comments

  1. 1.

    rkrider

    July 21, 2005 at 8:57 am

    But an opinion that the 50-year-old judge joined just last week in the case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld should be seriously troubling to anyone who values civil liberties. As a member of a three-judge panel on the D.C. federal court of appeals, Roberts signed on to a blank-check grant of power to the Bush administration to try suspected terrorists without basic due-process protections. Link Here

  2. 2.

    Tim F

    July 21, 2005 at 9:14 am

    Did you seriously just quote Manuel Miranda? You might as well quote Aldrich Ames about identity theft.

  3. 3.

    Emma Zahn

    July 21, 2005 at 11:18 am

    Since you quoted from a John Yoo opinion column…

    John Yoo is on the PBS News Hour frequently. Occasionally he slips up and reveals a very strong totalitarian streak. It bothers me. His support of Roberts will actually cause me to be a bit more suspicious of the nomination.

    BTW, I am not a liberal.

  4. 4.

    Rocky Smith

    July 21, 2005 at 11:24 am

    Kennedy, Schumer and Durbin would have complained about ANY Bush nominee that wasn’t an outright leftist. If Bush had nominated Kennedy, Schumer and Durbin might have still whined.

  5. 5.

    SomeCallMeTim

    July 21, 2005 at 11:32 am

    John Yoo writing opinion pieces about jurisprudence in the WP; tomorrow, OJ on the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization.

    Apparently, we really don’t have any shame.

  6. 6.

    Binkyboy

    July 21, 2005 at 12:29 pm

    Yes Rocky, no appontee should ever be questioned and their allegiances shouldn’t be uncovered during the process because, well, that would be whining and complaining.

    Stop focusing so much on 3 Democratic senators, you’re becoming obsessed. Your comment belongs more on a freeper site than here.

  7. 7.

    KC

    July 21, 2005 at 1:01 pm

    It is a joke. The FEC wants to regulate blogs, but the NYTimes, the Post, the Washington Times, Fox News, etc. all go unregulated though they participate in politics all the time. Just read Somerby , you’ll see his hobby-horse example, but an example nonetheless.

  8. 8.

    Marcus Wellby

    July 21, 2005 at 1:05 pm

    I had no idea David Brooks was ABSOLUTELY FLAMING!!

  9. 9.

    Rocky Smith

    July 21, 2005 at 1:08 pm

    Binkyboy- Why don’t you point out where I said the nominee should get carte blanche acceptance with no questioning? I never said that. My point was that those three Senators would oppose ANYONE that Bush nominated, even if they knew nothing about him. Questioning the nominee is a natural part of the confirmation process. I expect that. These three coming out against Roberts BEFORE the questioning is no suprise either.

  10. 10.

    DougJ

    July 21, 2005 at 1:42 pm

    “I had no idea David Brooks was ABSOLUTELY FLAMING!!”

    I second that opinion. I couldn’t believe how much it seemed like a gay love letter to Roberts. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

  11. 11.

    jg

    July 21, 2005 at 6:38 pm

    My point was that those three Senators would oppose ANYONE that Bush nominated, even if they knew nothing about him.

    I agree up to the point you said, ‘even if they knew nothing about him’. Since they are idealogically opposed they most likely would have a problem with a Bush appointee but they would definately check him out before speaking.

    These three coming out against Roberts BEFORE the questioning is no suprise either.

    S you think people should hold their opinions until after he’s questioned yet the right doesn’t think he should be questioned. I think we’re in a bit of a pickle here.

  12. 12.

    Glen

    July 21, 2005 at 7:20 pm

    Re: Brooks.

    I didn’t have much time for reading today. I really thought you were doing one of those “shorter Brooks” parodies. Jumping Jesus on a trampoline!

    Who, in the name of reason, takes this guy seriously — right, left, or Martian?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • schrodingers_cat on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:29pm)
  • Msb on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:29pm)
  • Geminid on Take the Fucking Win (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:27pm)
  • lowtechcyclist on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:27pm)
  • HumboldtBlue on Righteous Rant Open Thread (Apr 15, 2024 @ 5:26pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Talk of Meetups – Meetup Planning
Proposed BJ meetups list from frosty

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8
Virginia House Races
Four Directions – Montana
Worker Power AZ
Four Directions – Arizona
Four Directions – Nevada

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
Positive Climate News
War in Ukraine
Cole’s “Stories from the Road”
Classified Documents Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Political Action 2024

Postcard Writing Information

Balloon Juice for Four Directions AZ

Donate

Balloon Juice for Four Directions NV

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!