• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Come on, man.

I did not have this on my fuck 2022 bingo card.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

If you’re pissed about Biden’s speech, he was talking about you.

Eh, that’s media spin. biden’s health is fine and he’s doing a good job.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

A thin legal pretext to veneer over their personal religious and political desires

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Republicans are the party of chaos and catastrophe.

Shallow, uninformed, and lacking identity

I did not have telepathic declassification on my 2022 bingo card.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

A democracy can’t function when people can’t distinguish facts from lies.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

The GOP couldn’t organize an orgy in a whorehouse with a fist full of 50s.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Republican Stupidity / A Juxtaposition of Priorities

A Juxtaposition of Priorities

by John Cole|  November 17, 20051:50 pm| 23 Comments

This post is in: Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

‘Conservatives’ decide to tighten their belts and stop wasteful spending:

Emergency money that President George W. Bush requested to combat a looming influenza pandemic has been deleted from a U.S. health-funding bill after conservative Republicans insisted it would have to be paid for by cutting other government programs.

The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday was set to debate the massive health-funding bill. After days of intensive talks between the House and Senate, negotiators dropped a plan for $8 billion in funds that Democrats pushed through the Senate last month.

Following that Senate vote, Bush on November 1 asked Congress for $7.1 billion in emergency money.

The funding fight erupted after conservative Republicans in the House insisted that an emergency U.S. effort to stockpile vaccines and anti-viral drugs that could be effective against the deadly flu would have to be paid for by cutting other government programs.

But not too tight. Wouldn’t want Sen. Ted Stevens to resign, after all:

Mandatory funding for two controversial bridge projects in Alaska — including the ridiculed “bridge to nowhere” — has been stripped from a federal spending bill, a congressional committee said on Wednesday.

In an unusual move to change “pork” spending, House-Senate negotiators removed the $432 million in required spending during final talks on a yearly bill to fund programs for the Transportation and Treasury departments, the House Appropriations Committee said.

As a compromise, Alaska will still receive the money that had been set aside for the bridges to spend as it likes on transportation needs.

In other words, they defunded mandatory spending on the ‘bridge to nowhere,’ but gave them the damned money anyway.

Fiscal Conservatism circa 2005- Defund preparations for the pandemic flu, and shower Alaska with filthy lucre as a compromise for removing a stupid piece of pork-barreling spending that should not have been there anyway.

But at least Ted Stevens can keep his job– Alaska isn’t being ‘discriminated’ against.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « George Will on the Future of Conservatism
Next Post: More On The Sony Spyware »

Reader Interactions

23Comments

  1. 1.

    jcricket

    November 17, 2005 at 1:56 pm

    Good lord, what a ridiculous sham of fiscal conservatism. That’s just ridiculous. Alaska gets oodles of money from their oil discovery profits, they don’t need that money more than (say) poor people in Alabama or New Orleans. Also note that Ted Stevens is attempting to retaliate against those that oppose those bridges, like Sen. Cantwell, by relaxing environmental rules in WA state.

    Ted Stevens can go Cheney himself.

    BTW, in WA state supporters of the gas tax repeal (which failed) are always on the lookout for “gotcha” wasteful spending projects by the DOT. Where are the Republicans nationally on stuff like this? Nowhere.

    Say what you want about taxes, but it’s economics 101. Tax and spend is generally more fiscally sound policiy than borrow, spend + cut taxes.

  2. 2.

    Otto Man

    November 17, 2005 at 1:58 pm

    I’m glad to see they challenged the earmarks, but from my reading of the article it seems that the money is still earmarked to the state and can still be used to build the same “bridges to nowhere” if the governor so decides. And this is a governor who just spent $2.6 million on a luxury jet that can’t even land on most of the state’s runways. I wouldn’t be surprised if he put the bridges through, too.

    Personally, I wish they’d called Stevens’ bluff. Strike down the earmarks, turn the money to the Gulf Coast, and let Senator Crybaby take his ball and go home.

  3. 3.

    Zifnab

    November 17, 2005 at 2:03 pm

    Fiscal Conservativism. What a fucking joke. When you’re not cutting $500 billion dollar checks to big oil companies, you’re running up trillion dollar deficits.

    Let’s all remember one more time exactly which President it was that managed to bring our budget back into the black while waging peace in Kosovo, preserving Social Security, and reforming Medicare without gutting the system outright. Clinton we impeach? What a fucking country.

  4. 4.

    Steven Donegal

    November 17, 2005 at 2:09 pm

    This article from the Anchorage Daily News tells you as much about life in DC as you will ever need to know. Good God, the state may actually have to pay for something itself!

  5. 5.

    Shygetz

    November 17, 2005 at 2:33 pm

    That’s a compromise?

    Wow…Ok, you can’t have the money for a bridge to nowhere, but you can have the same amount to spend on whatever you want (including a bridge to nowhere). And Stevens sighs, grouses, and grudgingly accepts the “compromise.”

    So, when do Republicans compromise on food stamps. “Ok, you’re not going to get any more food stamps, but we will cut you a check for the same amount, and you can spend it on food if you want.”

  6. 6.

    circlethewagons

    November 17, 2005 at 2:36 pm

    You ever do a count of posts in the Republican Stupidity file as opposed to the number in the Democratic Stupidity one?

    Cause it seems to me that the Republicans are rapidly outstupiding the Democrats. At least lately.

  7. 7.

    Mr Furious

    November 17, 2005 at 2:37 pm

    “…this is a governor who just spent $2.6 million on a luxury jet that can’t even land on most of the state’s runways. I wouldn’t be surprised if he put the bridges through, too.”

    He should double-up and make the bridges long enough to land his jet on!

  8. 8.

    Kimmitt

    November 17, 2005 at 2:38 pm

    Look, it’s like this:

    Either a pandemic doesn’t happen, and the money is wasted, or the influenza hits. We already know that this Administration can’t find their asses with both hands and an ass-finding dog, so they’re going to botch the vaccine delivery anyways. So, politically, it’s lose-lose; may as well keep the pork and hope for the best.

  9. 9.

    Dantheman

    November 17, 2005 at 2:40 pm

    And of course, this is at the same time as another $70 billion in tax cuts are passing Congress. Can we officially proclaim “Republican fiscal conservatism” to be an oxymoron?

  10. 10.

    Sine.Qua.Non

    November 17, 2005 at 2:48 pm

    And here I thought the horse’s ass said he was going to resign either way! Damnit to hell.

  11. 11.

    Steve S

    November 17, 2005 at 2:52 pm

    If you go look at the Federal Budget, you’ll find the two biggest areas of discretionary expenditure are Military and Debt Payments.

    That is, we’re spending somewhere in the $300-400 billion a year range in Interest.

    You can talk all you want about cutting $2 billion in Medicaid or $3 billion in food stamps. It ain’t going to amount to a hill of beans. The real problem are those Interest payments.

    If we didn’t have the debt to begin with, our budget would be balanced.

    And who is to blame for that debt?

    That’s right… Ronald Reagan and GW Bush, the two people who never cared about debt and gave us plenty of it as their legacy.

    Fiscal conservatism is dead. Ronald Reagan killed it, and GW Bush tossed some dirt in the grave.

  12. 12.

    Steve S

    November 17, 2005 at 2:53 pm

    And of course, this is at the same time as another $70 billion in tax cuts are passing Congress. Can we officially proclaim “Republican fiscal conservatism” to be an oxymoron?

    But they aren’t really cuts. They are shifting the burden. The Republicans cut the taxes for the wealthy, but to make up with it, they have to sock it to the middle class.

    Look at their latest recommendations of eliminating mortgage tax deduction and such. I figured it out and it’s going to cost me a couple of grand.

  13. 13.

    Krista

    November 17, 2005 at 3:10 pm

    We already know that this Administration can’t find their asses with both hands and an ass-finding dog

    An ass-finding dog? I don’t think I want to know how it was trained…

  14. 14.

    Cyrus

    November 17, 2005 at 3:13 pm

    Kimmitt Says:

    Look, it’s like this:

    Either a pandemic doesn’t happen, and the money is wasted, or the influenza hits. We already know that this Administration can’t find their asses with both hands and an ass-finding dog, so they’re going to botch the vaccine delivery anyways. So, politically, it’s lose-lose; may as well keep the pork and hope for the best.

    I have to stop reading Balloon Juice at work, because several times, it has been hard to stop myself from literally laughing out loud. This time I failed completely.

  15. 15.

    Mac Buckets

    November 17, 2005 at 3:18 pm

    The Democrats were misled into voting 246-0 for this porked-up bill. They were lied to by Bush and didn’t think there really was any pork in the bill. Besides, they didn’t want the money to be spent on pork — they just authorized the President to spend the money on pork if all other means to achieve “Robert Byrd Bridge over Robert Byrd Farm Road 2763” failed. They can’t be held responsible for their unaninmous “yes to pork” vote.

    If the Democratic Party had the collective intelligence of a paper napkin, wouldn’t they have gotten it together to at least have a token number of Democrats vote “no” to the bill, rather than voting 246-0 in favor of pork, so they could at least pretend to be against it? McCain will be politically rewarded for his “no” vote down the line, book it.

  16. 16.

    Steve S

    November 17, 2005 at 3:32 pm

    Someone should check the dosage on Mac’s meds.

  17. 17.

    Mr Furious

    November 17, 2005 at 3:45 pm

    An ass-finding dog? I don’t think I want to know how it was trained…

    It’s easy. Since they’re all born as crotch-finders, it’s just a slight redirection around the corner…

    That line really cracked me up, nice onen Kimmitt.

  18. 18.

    scs

    November 17, 2005 at 4:22 pm

    You know I was thinking about that Alaskan bridge. The only reason I can think they are giving the money is not to build the bridge but to provide jobs to many unemployed people in the area, so like a works projects. Or, maybe it is somehow tied to trying to oil drilling in Alaska. Is it a quid pro quo? We’ll let you drill if you give us money. Or can this bridge be used for transport to the oil areas for any reason? There has got to be another reason than just the bridge.

  19. 19.

    JWeidner

    November 17, 2005 at 4:36 pm

    In all seriousness, the thing that is so galling about this isn’t so much the pork (although that is galling in its own right). It’s that the Republicans seem to have picked such an incredibly bad time to play the Fiscal Responsibility Game. We’re talking about spending $8 Billion to help fight what could be the worst virus to hit the US since the 1918 flu pandemic, and Republicans decide that THIS is where they need to make their stand against profligate spending.

    I mean, C’MON! Why would you choose now, when we could be staring down the barrel of a loaded gun, to cut funding that could possibly help aleviate the effects that an unchecked pandemic would cause? Why would you fly in the face of respectable scientific opinion…

    Wait…I forgot we’re dealing with the Republican party. Science doesn’t count, but Jesus saves.

  20. 20.

    Steve S

    November 17, 2005 at 11:20 pm

    We could say $100 billion next year by pulling our troops out of Iraq.

  21. 21.

    Jon H

    November 18, 2005 at 12:20 pm

    I say we give them the money, but drop it as loose bills and dollar coins from a helicopter over some grizzly-infested wetland.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice says:
    November 18, 2005 at 10:47 am

    […] Yesterday, I posted a Juxtaposition of Priorities, which included a piece demonstrating that while the GOP is claiming they removed the funding for the ‘bridge to nowhere,’ they really didn’t. it seems that was not clear to everyone, so I will let Radley Balko explain it in clearer terms: […]

  2. Balloon Juice says:
    December 24, 2005 at 4:49 pm

    […] Well, no kidding. Everyone here knew that, because I told you exactly what was going to happen last month when this took place: […]

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Betsy on Greetings Fellow Juicers (Jan 27, 2023 @ 12:41pm)
  • trollhattan on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 12:41pm)
  • Kay on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 12:40pm)
  • Ken on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 12:40pm)
  • Matt McIrvin on TGIFriday Morning Open Thread: Busy, Busy, Busy (Jan 27, 2023 @ 12:40pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!