• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Republican obstruction dressed up as bipartisanship. Again.

Infrastructure week. at last.

No one could have predicted…

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Good lord, these people are nuts.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

When your entire life is steeped in white supremacy, equality feels like discrimination.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

A lot of Dems talk about what the media tells them to talk about. Not helpful.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. let’s win this.

Let there be snark.

New McCarthy, same old McCarthyism.

He really is that stupid.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

The willow is too close to the house.

An almost top 10,000 blog!

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / War on Terror / War on Terror aka GSAVE® / The War Within The War

The War Within The War

by John Cole|  January 12, 20069:41 am| 11 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®

FacebookTweetEmail

Fascinating piece of reporting in the NY Times describing how American troops are approaching insurgents in Iraq to aid them in the fight against Al Qaeda:

American and Iraqi officials believe that the conflicts present them with one of the biggest opportunities since the insurgency burst upon Iraq nearly three years ago. They have begun talking with local insurgents, hoping to enlist them to cooperate against Al Qaeda, said Western diplomats, Iraqi officials and an insurgent leader.

It is impossible to say just how far the split extends within the insurgency, which remains a lethal force with a shared goal of driving the Americans out of Iraq. Indeed, the best the Americans can hope for may be a grudging passivity from the Iraqi insurgents when the Americans zero in on Al Qaeda’s forces.

But the split within the insurgency is coinciding with Sunni Arabs’ new desire to participate in Iraq’s political process, and a growing resentment of the militants. Iraqis are increasingly saying that they regard Al Qaeda as a foreign-led force, whose extreme religious goals and desires for sectarian war against Iraq’s Shiite majority override Iraqi tribal and nationalist traditions.

Read the whole thing.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Stupid Story of the Day
Next Post: Serenity Sequel »

Reader Interactions

11Comments

  1. 1.

    DJAnyReason

    January 12, 2006 at 10:19 am

    Ok, does this remind anybody else of how we worked with Bin Laden to force the Soviets out of Afghanistan?

  2. 2.

    carpeicthus

    January 12, 2006 at 10:21 am

    This story literally wouldn’t make sense to the hordes of wingnuts who have been insisting there is no “insurgency,” only COBRAAAA!… er, Al Qaeda.

  3. 3.

    The Other Steve

    January 12, 2006 at 11:07 am

    God I can’t find it now. But the other day I was reading a blog from Baghdad out I thought on the WashPo website. Can’t find it now.

    But they noted two things…
    #1. Insurgents are getting more bold because they think US troops are withdrawing.

    #2. As US troops have started to withdraw from Shiite areas, Iraqis have begun to realize that the violence is coming from within Iraq, and not from the US. (They said before when a bomb would go off, they usually saw a US plane overhead and attributed it to that)

    Now the Bushie moonbats will say, “See this is proof that we must stay in Iraq and help out these poor brown people who cannot help themselves.”

    But the reality is, is No. What the Baghdad bloggers missed, because they are pansy reporters pandering to moonbat common wisdom… is that point #2 also means something else. With the realization that the violence is coming from within Iraq, and the realization that US troops are leaving. That means Iraqis had better step up to fight the insurgents. They realize this, and that’s what they are going to have to do.

    It’s kind of like welfare. If the govt is giving you $500 a week, with no strings attached. Are you going to go out and try to find a job? What’s the point? I can sit at home and play Super Nintendo.

    But if the govt says, “Starting next month you’ll only get $400 a week, and each month after that we will subtract another $100 until June at which point you’ll get nothing.”

    Suddenly you’ve got motivation to go out and get a job.

    And that, my friends, is the The Other Steve Welfare Reform answer to Iraq.

    It also so happens to be John Murtha’s position, which the moonbats wailed and rended their clothes over.

  4. 4.

    demimondian

    January 12, 2006 at 11:39 am

    does this remind anybody else of how we worked with Bin Laden to force the Soviets out of Afghanistan

    Um, no — because there’s still no evidence that we actually worked with bin Laden.

  5. 5.

    DJAnyReason

    January 12, 2006 at 1:18 pm

    demimondian,

    If you want to make a partisan issue and play like the CIA didn’t help arm and train bin Ladin and his insurgents, that’s fine with me, I’m not going to make an issue of it. But can we please be adults here and address the real issue: Do we want to be allying and aiding an insurgent group with ends that are not in line with our own, just because we share an enemy?

  6. 6.

    srv

    January 12, 2006 at 1:36 pm

    Your cousin Juan had a translation from an arab paper (Al-Hayat?) earlier that said we’d already made secret agreements with Sunni insurgents (via tribal leaders, I assume) that they could join the police forces in places like Ramadi.

    Mr. Z (or whomever it really is), didn’t like that, thus the earlier bombings.

    All this AQ stuff is really a side game. They’re guests of the Sunni, and the chances of Osama taking the country over are less than zero.

    So, it’s been like a month. How did those elections come out?

  7. 7.

    Birkel

    January 12, 2006 at 2:30 pm

    It’s almost like the al Queda terrorists’ activities are creating fewer terrorists!

    And I thought our presence in Iraq was creating more terrorists. Hmmm…

    How to square all the propaganda from the Left…

  8. 8.

    Skip

    January 12, 2006 at 3:58 pm

    Recruiting Arab fighters against Al Q would be easier if the US didn’t have such a salient talent for pissing muslims off, whether by backing repressive Arab governments or by financing and arming expansionist Israeli regimes.

    That Pew poll six months ago showed the US in single digit approval numbers, even in places like Jordan.

    BTW, I don’t see the oleagenous Ms. Hughes charming our way out of this. She is too porcine to appeal to Muilim tastes.

  9. 9.

    srv

    January 12, 2006 at 6:25 pm

    It’s almost like the al Queda terrorists’ activities are creating fewer terrorists!

    Or the US is using strategery to redefine who is a terrorist… How many ex-Taliban are in the Afghan parliament?

  10. 10.

    Tulkinghorn

    January 12, 2006 at 7:30 pm

    Man oh man…

    I am just imagining the shitstorm that would erupt if this was happening under a Democratic administration. Actually talking to the enemy?

  11. 11.

    demimondian

    January 12, 2006 at 8:14 pm

    If you want to make a partisan issue and play like the CIA didn’t help arm and train bin Ladin and his insurgents, that’s fine with me, I’m not going to make an issue of it.

    So, you’re going to tell a popular lie and expect to get away with it? Blowback’s a great story, but, honey — it’s right up there with CIA cocaine, refuted.

    But can we please be adults here and address the real issue

    What? That you’re a liar who’s trying to change the subject after getting called on it?

    Do we want to be allying and aiding an insurgent group with ends that are not in line with our own, just because we share an enemy?Do we want to aid an isurgent group whose ends don’t completely align with ours because their short-term aims may? Of course we do.

    The enemy of my enemy is not my friend — but he or she can certainly be useful.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Alison Rose on Late Night Open Thread: Taxing Prep (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:26am)
  • Chetan Murthy on War for Ukraine Day 397: A New Week Begins (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:10am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 397: A New Week Begins (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:05am)
  • Chetan Murthy on War for Ukraine Day 397: A New Week Begins (Mar 28, 2023 @ 12:59am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 397: A New Week Begins (Mar 28, 2023 @ 12:34am)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!