• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

Republicans: “Abortion is murder but you can take a bus to get one.” Easy peasy.

This must be what justice looks like, not vengeful, just peaceful exuberance.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

“In the future, this lab will be a museum. do not touch it.”

Nothing worth doing is easy.

If you are still in the gop, you are either an extremist yourself, or in bed with those who are.

Anne Laurie is a fucking hero in so many ways. ~ Betty Cracker

Republicans want to make it harder to vote and easier for them to cheat.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

How any woman could possibly vote for this smug smarmy piece of misogynistic crap is beyond understanding.

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

Lick the third rail, it tastes like chocolate!

In my day, never was longer.

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Republicans got rid of McCarthy. Democrats chose not to save him.

Fear or fury? The choice is ours.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / z-Retired Categories / Previous Site Maintenance / Open Thread

Open Thread

by John Cole|  January 29, 200611:42 am| 48 Comments

This post is in: Previous Site Maintenance

FacebookTweetEmail

To be brutally honest, I am in no mood to blog today. Consider this an open thread.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Gatti v. Damgaard
Next Post: Congrats »

Reader Interactions

48Comments

  1. 1.

    Brian

    January 29, 2006 at 12:15 pm

    I wonder if John’s going to live-blog the Super Bowl. Speaking of the SB, does anyone have a handle on the odds? I’m pulling for Seattle, only because they’re going the the Big Game for the first time, and because I’m a west-coaster.

    Speaking of Big Game (although in this context, the hunting kind), did anyone see DNC DEan on Fox News Sunday, setting himself up for a trap with Chris Wallace? The shit’s gonna fly this week as “proof” comes out that Dem’s got payoffs directly from Abramoff, and/or got indirect money that affected their voting in favor of those interests. Dean said that there’s direct proof of the GOP doing this, but not the Dem’s. “This is a GOP scandal!!” Chris asked him if similar proof could be found on the Dem’s, would he change his tune? Of course, Dean had no choice at that point but to say “yes”.

    Rove’s people are very busy at this moment. I love Dean. He keeps stepping on his dick, and acting like a boomerang that cuts the Democrats to pieces.

  2. 2.

    Bruce Moomaw

    January 29, 2006 at 12:29 pm

    That diet is obviously having its effect. Sometime read S.J. Perelman’s account of his own experience with a 9-day diet (which he abandoned after 3 days). There are some things Man Was Not Meant To Know.

  3. 3.

    Gold Star for Robot Boy

    January 29, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    Chris asked him if similar proof could be found on the Dem’s, would he change his tune? Of course, Dean had no choice at that point but to say “yes”.

    Good for Dean. If the Dems are going to portray themselves as the party of integrity, they can’t shy away from ridding themselves of the tainted. If he had said ‘no’ to Wallace’s question, wouldn’t that make him a hypocrite?

  4. 4.

    Par R

    January 29, 2006 at 12:32 pm

    GO SEATTLE!!

    I see that over at the atrios site, Tiny Meat is all in a dither because the NYT didn’t fake their poll data even more and hit Bush harder; he writes in his best faux Andrew Sullivan mode: “I’m getting very tired of New York Times journalists writing about Bush’s rebounding support without evidence.” One can almost envision Tiny Meat stamping his feet while he was typing that sentence. He might want to visit Rasmussen’s site, wherein he will find Bush favorability numbers at 48% as of Saturday, nearing their highest levels in months.

  5. 5.

    chopper

    January 29, 2006 at 12:35 pm

    i think that’s the most brutally honest thing i’ve ever read.

  6. 6.

    Brian

    January 29, 2006 at 12:36 pm

    Yes, it would have made him a hypocrite, but that isn’t the point. The point is that the Dem’s are captive to lobbyists in measure proportionate to their power. Trying to paint a picture that the Left is not tainted is a fool’s errand. But Dean’s happy to play the fool.

    His two main points are that the Left is clean, and that the Dem’s are drafting legislation to clean up Washnington. (If you’re clean, why clean up yourself? But I digress.) The first point will be demonstrated to be false, and pronto; the other point will be seen as Dem’s drafting new legislation that will give all politicians new rules that will allow them to do more of the same.

    “Clean up Washington”, my ass. Dean and his ilk couldn’t clean a toilet with their tongue.

  7. 7.

    Brian

    January 29, 2006 at 12:37 pm

    I’m heading over to Atrios. Par R has captured my interest in what’s happening there.

  8. 8.

    Paddy O'Shea

    January 29, 2006 at 12:50 pm

    Is Saddam Hussein a Bush Conservative?

    Let’s look at the facts:

    1) Saddam Hussein led his country into a disastrous oil war. So did George W. Bush.
    2) Saddam tortured prisoners, some to death. Many suspect George Bush of continuing to do exactly that.
    3) They both shook hands with Donald Rumsfeld.
    4) Saddam obsessively spied on millions of his own countrymen. Bush continues to do the same.
    5) Both certainly seem to be spending a lot of time lately defending their actions while in office.

    And then there’s the sartorial thing, you know, both liking to affect a martial bearing by wearing the clothes of the military.

  9. 9.

    Mac Buckets

    January 29, 2006 at 1:03 pm

    John, I think the NFL open week is a good time to look back:

    Congrats to the Bengals, who hung on to win 38-31. Four turnovers, dozens (it seemed) of penalties, no running game, and NO pressure on Palmer doomed the Steelers. I think this was effectively the end of the season, and they will not even make the playoffs.

    Have you ever been so happy to be wrong?

  10. 10.

    Steve

    January 29, 2006 at 1:13 pm

    I love how Brian takes it as an article of faith that Abramoff, as partisan a Republican as there ever was, surely must have bribed Democrats too, “in equal proportion to their power.”

    Keep waiting for that mythical “proof” to come out – maybe it’s in the same drawer as the Iraqi WMDs.

    The point is that the Dem’s are captive to lobbyists in measure proportionate to their power.

    Have you ever heard of the K Street Project?

  11. 11.

    Paddy O'Shea

    January 29, 2006 at 1:15 pm

    Lots of people seem to be entertaining a lot of “lameduck” nonsense about George W. Bush lately.

    But obviously they have forgotten all about his stunning recent electoral successes!

    1) The strong showing by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
    2) The victory won by the pro-Iran Shi’ite Islamists in Iraq.
    3) The stunning and completely unexpected (at least by the intelligence-challenged Bush admin) win by Hamas in Palastine.
    4) Hezbollah’s recent victory in Lebanon.

    George W. Bush said that when elections come to Islamic countries freedom will be the result. And as we all know, President Bush is ALWAYS right!

  12. 12.

    Will

    January 29, 2006 at 1:24 pm

    Why are there no posts filed under “Democratic Stupidity” on the front page? I think it’s high time John finally admit what everyone else already knows.

  13. 13.

    Otto Man

    January 29, 2006 at 1:30 pm

    I love how Brian takes it as an article of faith that Abramoff, as partisan a Republican as there ever was, surely must have bribed Democrats too, “in equal proportion to their power.”

    It’s true. Just like when James Carville offered his strategic services to the Republicans in the 1990s “in equal proportion to their power.”

  14. 14.

    ppGaz

    January 29, 2006 at 1:36 pm

    Who was able to see Bill Frist on MTP this morning?

    It was a facinating 30 minutes of television. Tim Russert did an uncharacteristically good job of asking tough, well-crafted and well-researched questions.

    But Frist was the star of the show. Every answer, every phrase, every sentence, every constructed thought, was a lie, a complete and utter fabrication and deflection from the truth. It was a performance worthy of an Academy Award. Watch the show on MSNBC streaming video … and pay attention to Frist’s facial expressions as he explains how the NSA wiretaps are okay, and why he “diagnosed” Terri Schiavo by watching a video tape.

    Then, pay attention to what was going on under the table … literally, below the round table at which Russert and his victim are sitting. Frist looked electrified from the waist down, his legs and feet doing a bizarre gymnast’s routine down there, especially when talking about his HCA stock and the “blind trust” transactions that are the subject of inquiry.

    Watch it, and learn. Learn how completely and utterly and absolutely a politician can lie and lie and lie again.

    Amazing, classic, and depressing. You are watching the practiced dissembling and deceptions of a man who is a powerful figure in your government. Sobering.

  15. 15.

    ppGaz

    January 29, 2006 at 1:44 pm

    Dean said that there’s direct proof of the GOP doing this, but not the Dem’s. “This is a GOP scandal!!” Chris asked him if similar proof could be found on the Dem’s, would he change his tune?

    What a fucking idiot you are. The same thing happened last week on CNN with Wolf Blitzer, save for the gratuitous question. Blitzer, like Wallace, knows that there is no evidence linking Abramoff to any questionable Dem contributions. If there were, it would be all over the place by now. The interview proves that there is no such evidence, proves it beyond doubt.

    But you dumbshits don’t even have the good sense to approach the scandal from the only perspective that would give you any shred of integrity …. to decry the way your party has behaved and call for the corrupt to be held accountable and clean up your party. Instead you just follow your GOP and righty website talking points and talk glibly as if there is a bipartisan scandal going on here.

    So far, Abramoff is a 100% Republican scandal. And the more you buttheads pretend otherwise, the more deeply and firmly it will be shoved up your ass.

  16. 16.

    Paul Wartenberg

    January 29, 2006 at 1:46 pm

    I want to write an open letter to all American voters.

    True political reform cannot occur with our current government in power. If you examine their proposed ‘reforms’ you will notice they are mostly for show, minor tidbits of concern (whoever pays for dinners, cutting back on limo rides, what have you) that the powers that be are willing to part with in order to keep their established methods of fulfilling their greed (massive campaign funding, which has devolved into legalized bribery, as the most glaring example) intact.

    If you the American people want reform, and a good number of polling services show that you do, the power does not rest with Congress or the President: the power to install reform rests with you, the voters.

    Take a good hard look at your Senators, at your Representatives. Step outside the party line and take a good hard look at them. Look at how much money they get from lobby groups and special interests. Look at how their votes are twisted not by ideology or by practicality but by how much money they can make off the deal for the ones who’ve filled their campaign coffers.

    Take a look at their pork barrel projects, their earmarks, the amount of public money getting plugged into private interests, money that serves no useful purpose for the majority and always goes to a select few, if any.

    Take a good hard honest look at your elected representatives. And then vote them out of office. The truest, simplest reform package is your power of voting. Show the political body that those who serve the interests of corruption and greed will lose their jobs.

    It doesn’t matter if the political hack is of one party or another. Like I said, step outside that party line. It *does* matter if the pork barrel senator is Stevens from Alaska or Byrd from West Virginia: neither of them deserve to stay in office. It *does* matter if it’s a corrupt greedhead Rep like Tom DeLay or William Jefferson: neither of them deserve to stay in office. Your vote *does* matter in giving these guys the surefire sign that corruption and greed will not be tolerated: vote the bums out.

    Simple as that.

    Done with the speechifying. And now, Go Seahawks!

  17. 17.

    mycat

    January 29, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    The editors of the National Review see this a a Republican scandal. If they can be honest about it, so can every member of the Republican rank and file.

    Sorry, the K Street Project was of, by and for Republicans. Your party sold itself. If you want your party back, you will have to face that fact.

  18. 18.

    Richard Bottoms

    January 29, 2006 at 1:54 pm

    “My story is this,” he began. In broken English, Daham tearfully described the events of late March 2003, when he, Gufran and their four young children tried to flee the bombing in Nasiriya in Daham’s white Peugeot.

    “There is a sandstorm there and I don’t see,” he said. “There is four or three tanks American tanks in the gate, Nasiriya gate … I see the tanks there, I stop my car and I wait, I wait less than one minute and they shoot me.”

    Three of Daham’s children died almost instantly, the other perished at a U.S. Air Base hospital. Daham lost a leg and suffered bone and nerve damage in one arm. Gunshots broke both of Gufran’s arms.

    After the harrowing tragedy, the couple moved through various U.S. military hospitals, including the USS Comfort.

    Listening to the pain in Daham’s voice that January night, we knew that he wasn’t making this up. Still, we needed more confirmation and began a year of investigating his story, interviewing the family and following their recovery.

    A U.S. military spokesman said they found “an incident reported up the chain of command that appears similar to what Mr. Kassim tells CNN.” The incident, the spokesman said, “did not violate our rules of engagement” and was an unfortunate “part of the tragedy of war.”

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/20/crowley.btsc/

    Have a nice day.

  19. 19.

    Ancient Purple

    January 29, 2006 at 2:02 pm

    The point is that the Dem’s are captive to lobbyists in measure proportionate to their power. Trying to paint a picture that the Left is not tainted is a fool’s errand. But Dean’s happy to play the fool.

    Then where is that evidence? The FEC records make it very clear that Abramoff only donated directly to Republicans. There isn’t a single Democrat listed.

    Once that was placed on the table, then it was “oh, well Abramoff clients were donating to Democrats.” Yup. They were. Both BEFORE and after Abramoff came on the scene. But once Abramoff did come on the scene, his clients started donating LESS to Democrats.

    No one has ever said that Democrats were not receiving campaign contributions from Native American gaming interests except for the Karl Rove spin machine that says they were while clutching pearls and gasping.

    I have yet to see any evidence that receiving money from Native American gaming interests is illegal or violates the rules of the House or Senate. You may find it distasteful, but it is hard to press a scandal around matters of taste.

    Let’s repeat so Brian has a clear roadmap:

    1) Abramoff only donate his money to Republicans.
    2) Native American gaming interests donated to both Republicans and Democrats BEFORE Abramoff came on the scene.
    3) Native American gaming interests donated LESS to Democrats AFTER Abramoff came onto the scene.
    4) No one has ever maintained that receiving contributions from Native American gaming interests was or is illegal.
    5) This is a Republican scandal.

  20. 20.

    Laura

    January 29, 2006 at 2:06 pm

    Yes, it would have made him a hypocrite, but that isn’t the point. The point is that the Dem’s are captive to lobbyists in measure proportionate to their power. Trying to paint a picture that the Left is not tainted is a fool’s errand. But Dean’s happy to play the fool.

    The Abramoff affair is a Republican scandal, no matter how they’re trying to spin it. The stench from the K Street Project is strictly Republican. You might assume Democrats might be as corrupt as the current Republican congress if they had the same power. But since the Dems aren’t in power, it’s dishonest to pretend Congress’ current corruption problems are anything but overwhelmingly Republican. The media has been very helpful with the Republican spin of painting this as a bipartisan problem. If Dean’s a fool for setting the record straight, so be it. Fortunately, he’s got reality on his side.

  21. 21.

    Steve

    January 29, 2006 at 2:12 pm

    You guys are wasting time by bringing up the facts. It’s clear that it’s an article of faith for Brian, that the whole reason the media hasn’t published all this evidence of Democratic involvement is that they’re laying a trap – a trap that Howard Dean, fool that he is, has fallen right into.

    His tone of voice sounds just like the tone of the folks who are convinced that Joe Wilson will get indicted any day now. I urge you not to waste your time.

  22. 22.

    ppGaz

    January 29, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    You might assume Democrats might be as corrupt as the current Republican congress if they had the same power.

    Yes. At this point, I generally assume that a politician is lying until I have reason to think otherwise. The day when I give them the benefit of the doubt is over. That ship has sailed.

    But the issue in Abramoff is whether, or when, the Republicans will ever just take responsibility for any of the myriad things they have fucked up or done wrong in the last five years, or for that matter, going back to 1994.

    They act as though they are responsible for the country they are running only when they choose to take credit for something good that happened on their watch.

  23. 23.

    ppGaz

    January 29, 2006 at 2:19 pm

    You guys are wasting time by bringing up the facts.

    True, but it’s an open thread and there’s no football today.

  24. 24.

    charliedontsurf10

    January 29, 2006 at 2:49 pm

    Another day, another pathetic attempt by dumb scum reptiles tryin’ to make this a bi-partisan scandal.

    Nice try, schmucks. Abramoff is all yours. All funds went to fellow reptiles. Take his pioneering efforts on shrub’s behalf, for example.

    Still, it’s nice to see you shmendriks are so comfortable with your ignorance.

    The republican party – wholly without merit factually and legally since 1960, proudly representing dumb white trash and white collar criminals from the Gulf of Mexico to the Mason-Dixon Line.

  25. 25.

    charliedontsurf10

    January 29, 2006 at 2:54 pm

    Speaking of Big Game (although in this context, the hunting kind), did anyone see DNC DEan on Fox News Sunday, setting himself up for a trap with Chris Wallace? The shit’s gonna fly this week as “proof” comes out that Dem’s got payoffs directly from Abramoff, and/or got indirect money that affected their voting in favor of those interests. Dean said that there’s direct proof of the GOP doing this, but not the Dem’s. “This is a GOP scandal!!” Chris asked him if similar proof could be found on the Dem’s, would he change his tune? Of course, Dean had no choice at that point but to say “yes”.

    Sure thing, shmendrik. They must be hidin’ that proof the same place they’re hidin’ the WMD and the fellas that remember servin’ in TANG with your boy.

    Dismissed.

  26. 26.

    demimondian

    January 29, 2006 at 3:10 pm

    Thanks for reminding me that I needed to contact Senators Cantwell and Murray to encourage them to vote for extended debate tomorrow. More than that, you convinced me to suggest the same thing to FDDD and the eldest of the demi-offspring, who will soon be of voting age, as well.

  27. 27.

    Mike S

    January 29, 2006 at 4:27 pm

    The shit’s gonna fly this week as “proof” comes out that Dem’s got payoffs directly from Abramoff,

    Poor fella. People in his party are being nailed for bribary, by the Bush justice dept no less, and he is just dumb enough to think that a dies in the wool Republican was doing the same thing with Democrats.

  28. 28.

    Pb

    January 29, 2006 at 4:43 pm

    Paddy O’Shea,

    Regarding your inflammatory Bush-Saddam allegations: do you have any PROOF that Donald Rumsfeld ever shook the hand of George W. Bush? And really, so what if they did, that doesn’t prove anything, the President shakes thousands of people’s hands, it could just be another one of those “grip-and-grin” photos…

    “I’ve had my picture taken with a lot of people. Having my picture taken with someone doesn’t mean that, you know, I’m a friend with them or know them very well.” — George W. Bush

    Take *that*, Rumsfeld!

  29. 29.

    Jon H

    January 29, 2006 at 4:49 pm

    “ABC News anchor Bob Woodruff and his cameraman were seriously wounded today in a roadside bomb attack near Taji, Iraq, according to a statement from ABC News. Woodruff, who co-anchors “World News Tonight,” and cameraman Doug Vogt “are out of surgery and are both in stable condition,” an ABC statement said. Both had head injuries.”

    I guess some of that “unreported good news” found them before they found it.

  30. 30.

    Par R

    January 29, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    The posts above by Steve, ppGaz, Ancient Purple, and Laura, among others, certainly convince me that the Democrats are innocent and as pure as the driven slush when it comes to the Abramoff affair. On the other hand, it would appear that it may be an altogether different result when one examines the views of Americans at large, as Rasmussen has done:

    “Does the Abramoff corruption scandal involve…

    Republicans in Congress 17%
    Democrats in Congress 5%
    Members of Both Parties 52%
    RasmussenReports.com

  31. 31.

    Ancient Purple

    January 29, 2006 at 5:19 pm

    Par R,

    I am simply requesting any evidence that Abramoff gave money directly to Democrats. I will reiterate that the CLIENTS of Abramoff gave money to both Dems and Reps BEFORE any one knew who Abramoff was. No one is claiming that there was anything wrong with Native American gaming interests giving donations to candidates.

    As to the poll, I am sure many Americans do think both parties are involved with this. However, as Abramoff sings and the courts get involved, I am sure you will see those numbers change dramatically.

    I am sure, in fairness, you will be posting a poll after all of this is done showing the numbers? Or will you conveniently forget to post a poll because you don’t like the results?

  32. 32.

    demimondian

    January 29, 2006 at 5:19 pm

    Par R, you are absolutely right. It’s good to see someone who understands that the lefties on this site are just hothouse flowers, whose fragile lives would be snuffed in just a moment in the real battlefield, and whose ideals are the result of the left-wing MSM’s constant liberal cherrleading, by distracting Americans from the real acts of the President’s supporters with a steady stream of “pretty missing blondes of the week”.

  33. 33.

    charliedontsurf10

    January 29, 2006 at 5:26 pm

    Ah, rasmussen. Always rasmussen with the wacks.

    Tell me, what do the reputable polls say?

    That’s what I thought.

    Dismissed

  34. 34.

    Par R

    January 29, 2006 at 5:32 pm

    From above: “The shit’s gonna fly this week as ‘proof’ comes out that Dem’s got payoffs directly from Abramoff, and/or got indirect money that….”

    This appears rather unlikely to happen. However, a blogger over at DK claims that there are photos of Abramoff in bed with one or more prominent Dems. I won’t believe it until they release the photos.

  35. 35.

    Steve

    January 29, 2006 at 5:39 pm

    So Republicans lie to the public about it being a bipartisan scandal, and some people believe them. This is news in what way?

  36. 36.

    Bob In Pacifica

    January 29, 2006 at 5:49 pm

    Par R, what your Rasmussen survey shows, if it is accurate, is that Republican lying works. We already knew that. Bush lied us into war. In fact, with the help of the media, of course people would think that it’s bipartisan. This is apparently the first bipartisan thing in Washington in the last five years.

    I think it was Brian who colorfully said that Howard Dean and other Demos couldn’t clean out a toilet bowl with their tongues. I certainly wouldn’t. So is Brian saying that this is something else that Republicans do better than Democrats?

    Fact is that the Republicans have proven that if you don’t believe in government government won’t work when you control it.

    +++

    Of course, in this time of bleak midwinter, this is the saddest Sunday of all, because it is the first Sunday without football. Then the Super Bowl next week, and then half a year of no football. I think I’ll get my last Negra Modelo out of the fridge.

  37. 37.

    Sojourner

    January 29, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    So Republicans lie to the public about it being a bipartisan scandal, and some people believe them. This is news in what way?

    True. It was said long ago: “There’s a sucker born every minute.”

  38. 38.

    ppGaz

    January 29, 2006 at 5:56 pm

    convince me that the Democrats are innocent

    Well, you claim to be “swayed” by bloggers and polls.

    We are just reflecting the evidence.

    It’s a subtle difference, eh?

  39. 39.

    Bob In Pacifica

    January 29, 2006 at 6:00 pm

    I am always curious about how questions are phrased, etc., in these surveys. If there are 48% who are favorable to Bush, and earlier this week there was 36% favorable, what does that say? That Bush’s sales job for illegal NSA spying convinced 12% of the country to jump back on board the bandwagon.

    And what does it mean that one day 54% of the people want to open impeachment hearings in Bush broke the law and then the next day 51% support Bush wiretapping bin Laden (and presumably all of us al Qaeda buddies here in the US)?

    I doubt that there is that much movement at all, and that it really depends on how the question is phrased and in what context the question is asked. There hasn’t been anything to move that many people to change their minds about Bush. The only thing you hear at BJuice are the same big daddy-worshipping cheerleaders for Bush and those of us who decided Bush was crap long ago. I’ve seen no conversions either way.

    Something like 14% of Americans think that the economy is going to get better in the next year. The price at the pump went up again today.

  40. 40.

    Bob In Pacifica

    January 29, 2006 at 6:07 pm

    Somebody asked back there, “convince me that the Democrats are innocent.”

    Sure, as soon as you convince me you stopped beating your wife, you aren’t a member of the KKK and that your aren’t a serial killer.

    The evidence is that there is there is no evidence.

  41. 41.

    Mike S

    January 29, 2006 at 6:10 pm

    As the [ublic learns more about just who Abramhoff is they will understand the falacy of the “both parties are guilty” BS being put out by the GOP message machine. Of course there will still be some GOP cultists that believe that a dyed in the wool Republican, a big member of the College Republicans, a good friend of Tom Delay, a man that gave his personal money only to Republicans, a man that set up many PACs and charities that gave heavily to the GOP and a member of Bush’s transition team was helping Democrats as well.

  42. 42.

    Richard Bottoms

    January 29, 2006 at 6:11 pm

    The legacy of free-spirited scoundrels was inherited by Gov. Edwin Edwards, a populist charmer who served four terms over the period of 1972 to 1996. The dapper womanizer beat two dozen corruption investigations and once said the only way he could lose a race was by being “found in bed with a dead girl or a live boy.”

    Or a live man named Abramoff.

    So throw out the crooks whoever they are.

    My bet os the list of Republicans in bed with Mr. Abramoff is way longer then Democrats.

  43. 43.

    Laura

    January 29, 2006 at 6:30 pm

    The posts above by Steve, ppGaz, Ancient Purple, and Laura, among others, certainly convince me that the Democrats are innocent and as pure as the driven slush when it comes to the Abramoff affair. On the other hand, it would appear that it may be an altogether different result when one examines the views of Americans at large,

    Does the Abramoff corruption scandal involve…

    Republicans in Congress 17%
    Democrats in Congress 5%
    Members of Both Parties 52%
    RasmussenReports.com

    The only thing this poll proves is that lying works. While it’s good “politics” to convince Americans that Abramoff is a bipartisan scandal, the dishonesty of Republican spin masters is nothing to applaud.

    If I were a Republican, I’d be less impressed with the politics, and more concerned about the dismal governing. By a 14 point margin, Americans trust Democrats to manage the country’s problems more than Republicans. That’s about governance, not scoring political points by painting the Democrats as “corrupt as we are.” And don’t think Republicans aren’t noticing. This morning, Chuck Hagel took a swing at Rove for making national security a political issue. He then joined the growing chorus of criticism about the illegal wire tapping. You have to expect this from Hagel. But it wasn’t just him going after Bush. Just about every morning show had a Republican suggesting Bush disclose his contacts with Abramoff.

  44. 44.

    GTinMN

    January 29, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    The ‘Par R’ handle, and the accompanying Bushwa, to me looks suspiciously like a case where DougJ fat-fingered his recently employed ‘Pat R’ (Robertson) handle at some point, and is now sticking with the new variant, with no one the wiser.

    I could well be wrong, of course, but if not, he’s surely caught himself his limit today.

  45. 45.

    Paddy O'Shea

    January 29, 2006 at 9:20 pm

    To add to Laura’s excellent post on the impending demise of the disgraced Republican Party this fall, the following from the ABC News Poll:

    “The Republican party is feeling the pinch as well. The Democrats lead them by 14 points, 51 to 35 percent in trust to handle the nation’s problems, the first Democratic majority on this question since 1992. And the Democrats hold a 16 point lead in the 2006 congressional election preferences, 54 to 38 percent among registered voters, their best since 1984. Independents – quintessential swing voters- prefer the democrats’ diection over Bush’s by 51 to 27 percent, and favor the Democrat over the Republican in Congressional races by 54 to 32 percent.”

    Also:

    “Bush’s problems clearly benefit the opposition. Americans – by a 16-point margin, 51 to 35 percent – now say the country should go in the direction in which the Democrats want to lead, rather than follow Bush. That’s a 10-point drop for the president from a year ago, and the democrats first head-tohead majority of his presidency.”

    This is devastating news for the freedom hating right, and to me it looks like the only people being fooled these days are hardcore Republicans. And obviously they’re doing it to themselves.

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/PollVault/story?id=1549959&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

  46. 46.

    Laura

    January 29, 2006 at 9:44 pm

    “ABC News anchor Bob Woodruff and his cameraman were seriously wounded today in a roadside bomb attack near Taji, Iraq, according to a statement from ABC News. Woodruff, who co-anchors “World News Tonight,” and cameraman Doug Vogt “are out of surgery and are both in stable condition,” an ABC statement said. Both had head injuries.”

    Woodruff’s brother lives in Tahoe City, and a local Sacramento station had a phone interview with him. He said he’d heard that Bob’s ekg was fine, but that he had brain swelling and they had to remove part of his skull to relieve the pressure. You can hear the interview here.

  47. 47.

    Laura

    January 29, 2006 at 10:20 pm

    This is devastating news for the freedom hating right, and to me it looks like the only people being fooled these days are hardcore Republicans.

    I think you’re right. My dad was a life-long Republican until the last national election. He’s now a registered Independent. He went to dinner a couple months ago with some friends, all Republicans. His friend’s elderly mother said she thought Bush had a screw loose. My dad said they all laughed, but they thought she was right. They then spent the evening talking about what a disaster Bush has been. They’re not politically active, so you’re not going to hear from them. But more and more, I’m seeing letters to the editor from “former” and “disgusted” Republicans. The John Murtha smear was the last straw for many. While moderate Republicans aren’t as vocal as the rightwing base, they’re not a small number. In addition, the numbered of registered “Independents” is growing. The Republican party under Rove has been so good at playing hardball politics, they thought that could distract Americans from their incompetence and negligence. These polls suggest otherwise.

  48. 48.

    ats

    January 29, 2006 at 10:24 pm

    This is just more of the “last throes” perpetrated by the “dead enders” running this insurrection, insofar as it even is an insurrection. Scott McClellan will make it all clear to us on Monday.

    Grover Nordquist has volunteered to drown Saddam in his Restoration Inc. bathtub. Life is good.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - PaulB - Olympic National Park: Lake Quinault 1
Image by PaulB (5/17/25)

Recent Comments

  • BellyCat on Saturday Morning Open Thread: A Ray of Hope (May 17, 2025 @ 12:15pm)
  • BellyCat on Saturday Morning Open Thread: A Ray of Hope (May 17, 2025 @ 12:12pm)
  • columbusqueen on Excellent Read: ‘This is Democrats’ Masterclass in Resistance’ (May 17, 2025 @ 12:12pm)
  • Chief Oshkosh on Excellent Read: ‘This is Democrats’ Masterclass in Resistance’ (May 17, 2025 @ 12:11pm)
  • Ben Cisco on Saturday Morning Open Thread: A Ray of Hope (May 17, 2025 @ 12:08pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!