• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

If you still can’t see these things even now, maybe politics isn’t your forte and you should stop writing about it.

“But what about the lurkers?”

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

Baby steps, because the Republican Party is full of angry babies.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

Shut up, hissy kitty!

The media handbook says “controversial” is the most negative description that can be used for a Republican.

We are learning that “working class” means “white” for way too many people.

Trumpflation is an intolerable hardship for every American, and it’s Trump’s fault.

“Facilitate” is an active verb, not a weasel word.

The Supreme Court cannot be allowed to become the ultimate, unaccountable arbiter of everything.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

“Alexa, change the president.”

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

GOP baffled that ‘we don’t care if you die’ is not a winning slogan.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

I really should read my own blog.

Celebrate the fucking wins.

Giving up is unforgivable.

White supremacy is terrorism.

There are some who say that there are too many strawmen arguments on this blog.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Wait Just A Minute…

Wait Just A Minute…

by John Cole|  October 8, 200611:55 pm| 37 Comments

This post is in: Politics, Republican Stupidity

FacebookTweetEmail

I am pretty up to speed on the 90’s anti-Clinton talking points, so this came as a little shock:

DEAN BARNETT sends a link to what he says will be his last Foleygate post. In his email, he comments: “I can’t stand it any more. Remember when sex scandals actually involved sex? I miss Clinton!”

Enough to make Barnett miss Clinton? Ah, the pieces are all coming together now . . . .

Now granted, I am no longer in the ‘good’ republican club, but that hasn’t wiped my memory. If you will all think back to the Clinton glory days, the GOP talking point was that the scandal “isn’t about the sex, it is about the lying.”

With all the Republican lying and abuses of power, I guess I can understand why the GOP would want to pretend this was all about sex.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « WVU/Miss State
Next Post: Baker Accepts Civil War »

Reader Interactions

37Comments

  1. 1.

    craigie

    October 8, 2006 at 11:59 pm

    It’s not about the sex, or the lying – it’s about the losing of power.

    And they are definitely against that.

  2. 2.

    Perry Como

    October 9, 2006 at 12:18 am

    Another anti-Democrat talking point: North Korea may have just detonated a nuclear weapon. It’s Clinton’s fault!

  3. 3.

    croatoan

    October 9, 2006 at 12:18 am

    A former House page says he had sex with Mark Foley “after receiving explicit e-mails in which the congressman described assessing the sexual orientation and physical attributes of underage pages but waiting until later to make direct advances.” (This page was 21 at the time, so he was a consenting adult.)

  4. 4.

    Pb

    October 9, 2006 at 12:36 am

    Yeah, that’s what they said… but it was totally about the sex. Sex sells. They weren’t talking about how Clinton lied about a cigar or a blue dress. If lying sold, Bush would have been impeached years ago, or he would have lost in 2004. But no, it’s all about sensationalism.

  5. 5.

    Sirkowski

    October 9, 2006 at 12:48 am

    They can’t even lie properly.

  6. 6.

    Proud Liberal

    October 9, 2006 at 6:17 am

    house of cards crumbling before our eyes. Their trying to blame the Dems, demanding that they swear under oath that they had nothing to do with these disclousures. Not washing. Even mild mannered Wolf of CNN got in one congressman’s face demanding to know if he had ANY evidence Dems were involved. Blame everyone but those responsible. There is NEVER any personal responsibility with Republicans, it is ALWAYS someone else’s fault. What absolute scum.

  7. 7.

    Zifnab

    October 9, 2006 at 7:16 am

    But that was the beauty of Clinton. He was a blameable as the sun, as guilty as the moon. Whether we was invading Kosovo (an illegal war with no exit strategy for an unjust cause!) or firing cruise missles as Bin Laden (wag the dog!) or stubbornly persisting in 3-party talks with Palestine and Isreal (he only thinks about his legacy!), Clinton’s actions always somehow ended up pissing off the entire Republican Party no matter what they were.

    I say thank god Bush is in office. I just don’t think I could have stood another 8 years of Republicans failing to get behind the President.

  8. 8.

    p.lukasiak

    October 9, 2006 at 7:29 am

    Let not forget blame “the gays”

    the Washington Post is now reporting that outed GOP retiring congresscritter Kolbe allowed pages and other people to use his townhouse when he was out of town — there is no mention of sexual impropriety, and no exploration of whether non-gay congresscritters do likewise. The article is simply about smearing gay people by implication.

    Lots of gay GOP staff (both out, and closeted) were involved in covering up for Foley — but they weren’t doing it to protect Foley, they were doing it to protect the GOP leadership. Boehner is a perfect example…. he claims he told Hastert about Foley, and having “reported it to his superior” he’d done all that was necessary.

    That, of course, is complete BS. First of all, Hastert is not Boehner’s superior — the Speakership is a Constitutional office, the Majority Leader position is purely political, and as the Majority Leader Boehner was not subordinate to Hastert. Secondly, its not really the job of the Speaker to deal with ethical issues arising from the behavior of Congresscritters — that’s the job of the Ethics Committee, and that is where Boehner should have taken his concerns. Boehner wanted this thing covered up, not dealt with — and he doubtless knew that the best way to achieve that was to go to Hastert who has a slew of closeted (like his Chief Counsel Van Der Meid) and “out” (like House Clerk Trandahl) subordinates.

    (And lets not forget that Foley — as a Deputy Whip — was part of the GOP leadership in the House. If Boehner really wanted this dealt with, he would have taken it to Foley’s direct superior, Majority Whip Roy Blunt, and dumped it in his lap.)

    The “Velvet Mafia” was used by the House Leadership to keep a lid on Foley’s indiscretions. That is the real story here — but lots of people want to “blame the gays” and pretend that they were protecting Foley on their own.

  9. 9.

    cd6

    October 9, 2006 at 7:43 am

    Another anti-Democrat talking point: North Korea may have just detonated a nuclear weapon. It’s Clinton’s fault!

    Time to attack Iran!

  10. 10.

    Bombadil

    October 9, 2006 at 8:06 am

    Time to attack Iran!

    Nah, that would make at least a minimal amount of sense (they may have nukes, too). I bet we attack Mexico!

  11. 11.

    The Other Steve

    October 9, 2006 at 8:07 am

    Well, it appears the Bush policy of Cheap Rhetoric aimed at North Korea with the intention of ignoring the problem and letting China deal with it…

    Has become yet another Miserable Failure(tm) of a foreign policy.

  12. 12.

    The Other Steve

    October 9, 2006 at 8:11 am

    Ah ha! I knew I could find the spin if I went and looked.

    North Korea is Clinton’s fault!

  13. 13.

    Paul L.

    October 9, 2006 at 8:26 am

    OT
    So much for the talking point that women agonize over the decision to have a abortion.
    Feminist Blogger Calls Fetus ‘Parasite’; Publicly Announces Intent to Kill

  14. 14.

    Mac Buckets

    October 9, 2006 at 8:44 am

    firing cruise missles as Bin Laden (wag the dog!)

    This is why Democrats can’t take the high ground in a thread about lying. Well, this and the non-existent Max Cleland “morph-into-bin-Laden” ad.

  15. 15.

    rbl

    October 9, 2006 at 8:48 am

    So much for the talking point that women agonize over the decision to have a abortion.

    Quick, I’m thinking of a logical fallacy, first one to name it gets a fabulous prize.

  16. 16.

    Proud Liberal

    October 9, 2006 at 8:58 am

    oh …. bucket boy emerges from under his ideological rock. Been pretty quiet of late there bucketboy…. must be rough on you with Woodward’s book, with Sen. Waner’s statements, with the NIE report, with the deteriation in Iraq, with Afghanistan on the brink of being lost, with the coverup of a Republican sex predator ring… but nice to see you still have your penchant for making a complete fool of yourself. So, let me get this right, Max Cleland wasn’t portrayed as being soft on terrorism and a tv commerical did not have Osama bin Laden photo right after Cleland’s ? (or is the word “morph” what you are hanging your chickenhawk helmet on?)

  17. 17.

    chopper

    October 9, 2006 at 9:01 am

    oh yeah, i forgot. mac doesn’t believe in history. all that ‘wag the dog’ stuff never happened.

  18. 18.

    Bombadil

    October 9, 2006 at 9:02 am

    Now, now, chopper and Proud Liberal, be nice. I’m sure Mac Buckets is arguing in good faith.

  19. 19.

    Paul L.

    October 9, 2006 at 9:10 am

    Quick, I’m thinking of a logical fallacy, first one to name it gets a fabulous prize.

    Logical fallacy
    I am guessing you are thinking of Hasty generalization.

    But you may be thinking of these.
    Post hoc ergo propter hoc
    Straw man

  20. 20.

    Bombadil

    October 9, 2006 at 9:13 am

    But you may be thinking of these.
    Post hoc ergo propter hoc

    Or you may be thinking of these:

    Braccae tuae aperiuntur.
    Canis menus id comedit.
    Furnulum pani nolo.
    Gramen artificiosum odi.

    and of course,

    Illiud Latinae dici non potest.

    Latin is your friend.

  21. 21.

    Bruce Moomaw

    October 9, 2006 at 9:22 am

    Notice the real kicker in Reynolds’ entry — his statement that the Foley scandal is MUCH less disturbing than Bill Clinton’s? If this nitwit did not exist, Kos would have to invent him.

  22. 22.

    Steve

    October 9, 2006 at 9:22 am

    So much for the talking point that women agonize over the decision to have a abortion.

    What a pathetic fucking asshole you are.

  23. 23.

    RSA

    October 9, 2006 at 9:24 am

    Latin is your friend.

    Video a jackalope?

  24. 24.

    demimondian

    October 9, 2006 at 9:25 am

    Hey, Paul! Found those fake bodies in Qana yet?

    (No, by the way, *this* isn’t a logical fallacy. It’s an example of _appeal to authority_, in reverse. How it applies to you, I leave to the intelligent readers to figure out.)

  25. 25.

    demimondian

    October 9, 2006 at 9:27 am

    I love it — we’re already seeing the attempt to change the subject to North Korea.

    Why? Well, because our fearless leader has a plan for North Korea. Stay the course, boys and ghouls! We’ll keep telling lies and deflecting blame, and we will hold onto power!

    You’re doing a heckuva job, Georgie.

  26. 26.

    Paul L.

    October 9, 2006 at 9:38 am

    Hey, Paul! Found those fake bodies in Qana yet?

    Care to address my point.
    Of course in your opinion, there was no staging of events.
    The Red Cross Ambulance Incident
    Directed By Green Helmet Guy

  27. 27.

    yet another jeff

    October 9, 2006 at 9:42 am

    Anyone got a link to the vid of the anti-Cleland ad? I just want to see if the quibbling is over whether it was a fade or an actual morph.

  28. 28.

    The Other Steve

    October 9, 2006 at 9:45 am

    This is why Democrats can’t take the high ground in a thread about lying.

    Because Democrats didn’t attack Clinton for wagging the dog when he tried to get Bin Laden?

    This makes you sound credible?

    How exactly?

  29. 29.

    The Other Steve

    October 9, 2006 at 9:47 am

    Hey, Melodrama… while you’re hear. Any opinions on the Hastert/Reynolds/Foley scandal?

    What about that Nuke in North Korea?

  30. 30.

    Proud Liberal

    October 9, 2006 at 9:50 am

    Anyone got a link to the vid of the anti-Cleland ad? I just want to see if the quibbling is over whether it was a fade or an actual morph.

    here is the tv ad attacking Cleland

  31. 31.

    Pb

    October 9, 2006 at 9:51 am

    Regarding the ad:

    It opened with pictures of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. “As America faces terrorists and extremist dictators,” said a narrator, “Max Cleland runs television ads claiming he has the courage to lead. He says he supports President Bush at every opportunity, but that’s not the truth. Since July, Max Cleland voted against President Bush’s vital homeland security efforts 11 times!”

    Immediately the ad was denounced, not just by Democrats but also by two Republican senators — John McCain and Chuck Hagel, both of them Vietnam veterans.

    “I’ve never seen anything like that ad,” says McCain. “Putting pictures of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden next to a picture of a man who left three limbs on the battlefield — it’s worse than disgraceful, it’s reprehensible.”

    Irate, Hagel told Republican officials that if they didn’t pull the ad, he would make an ad denouncing them. After that, Chambliss’s campaign removed the pictures of Hussein and bin Laden from the ad.

    “Max Cleland has given as much to this country as any living human being,” Hagel says. “To say he is in some way connected to people like Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein was beyond offensive to me. It made me recoil, quite honestly.”

  32. 32.

    Steve

    October 9, 2006 at 9:52 am

    Cmon, we’ve seen Darrell argue for days that there was nothing racist about the Willie Horton ad.

    You expect Mac to admit there was something slimy about the Cleland ad? Two peas in a pod.

  33. 33.

    Proud Liberal

    October 9, 2006 at 10:04 am

    clowns like MacBuckets and Darrell are, if nothing else, entertaining. I almost look forward to see how they will spin a factual event that occurred in the reality based world into another bizzaro world attack on Clinton or Nacny Pelosi. Like the child with his hand stuck in the cookie jar denying the obvious, I view their verbal gymnastics with a bemused smile to my face.

    Lets go bucketboy…. come on… tell us about that poll again and how our policy in Iraq is such a success.. that is one of my all time favorites…

    Darrell…do your boyscout thing again, that was fun.

    Hold on, let me get my popcorn first.

  34. 34.

    demimondian

    October 9, 2006 at 11:04 am

    Um, no, Paul, I don’t. There was no staing of events at Qana, and there’s no validity to your “argument”, either.

    I don’t waste time responding to the “arguments” of circle jerkers like you — you aren’t worth it.

  35. 35.

    Tsulagi

    October 9, 2006 at 11:38 am

    Do guys like Dean Barnett at least have the sense to giggle when they write their bullshit for the parrot troops, or is that asking too much?

    So after a week of Foley/Predatorgate, he’s more than had his fill. Stick fingers in ears. Lalalalala… He exhorts his fellow parrots to do the same and “the time to get back on message has come.”

    Yeah, this from the guys who still haven’t had their fill of Monica’s blue dress. The ones who morphed the role of an independent prosecutor for how many years to perform as a Republican Party hatchet? Where when Starr once wanted to quit after a few years with nothing to show for it and they told him wrong answer.

    So Barnett sums up that calls to hold those responsible for covering for Foley demonstrates that it has never been so obvious “the need for Republican victory in November.” Gotta give them this, these guys in the short pants are funny. Maybe after November they can take their skits to SNL.

  36. 36.

    jg

    October 9, 2006 at 12:08 pm

    With all the Republican lying and abuses of power, I guess I can understand why the GOP would want to pretend this was all about sex.

    They will pretend its about anything the right wants it to be about.

  37. 37.

    The Asshole Formerly Known as GOP4Me

    October 9, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    clowns like MacBuckets and Darrell are, if nothing else, entertaining. I almost look forward to see how they will spin a factual event that occurred in the reality based world into another bizzaro world attack on Clinton or Nacny Pelosi. Like the child with his hand stuck in the cookie jar denying the obvious, I view their verbal gymnastics with a bemused smile to my face.

    Speaking as a colleague, though, that wasn’t Mac’s best work. He’s put out much better stuff before. I hope he hasn’t lost his edge. Once you get rusty at spoofing, you can never go back. Shit, look at me, for example.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - lashonharangue - Along the Zambezi River [2 of 2]
Image by lashonharangue (12/9/25)

2026 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

PLEASE REVIEW YOUR INFO ASAP

Recent Comments

  • Almost Retired on Open Thread: Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is Running for Senate (Dec 9, 2025 @ 6:15pm)
  • piratedan on Open Thread: Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is Running for Senate (Dec 9, 2025 @ 6:12pm)
  • WTFGhost on Sunday Night Open Thread (Dec 9, 2025 @ 6:11pm)
  • laura on Open Thread: Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is Running for Senate (Dec 9, 2025 @ 6:10pm)
  • Geminid on Open Thread: Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is Running for Senate (Dec 9, 2025 @ 6:09pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!