• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Is it negotiation when the other party actually wants to shoot the hostage?

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

No one could have predicted…

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

Come on, man.

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

The party of Reagan has become the party of Putin.

“What are Republicans afraid of?” Everything.

“I never thought they’d lock HIM up,” sobbed a distraught member of the Lock Her Up Party.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

You are so fucked. Still, I wish you the best of luck.

Never entrust democracy to any process that requires republicans to act in good faith.

If you tweet it in all caps, that makes it true!

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

After roe, women are no longer free.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

I’d hate to be the candidate who lost to this guy.

Give the craziest people you know everything they want and hope they don’t ask for more? Great plan.

Conservatism: there are some people the law protects but does not bind and others who the law binds but does not protect.

I’d try pessimism, but it probably wouldn’t work.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / More From the Corner

More From the Corner

by John Cole|  October 15, 200811:37 am| 54 Comments

This post is in: Clown Shoes

FacebookTweetEmail

More nonsense from the Corner, this time from Jonah Goldberg, responding to Byron York:

Reading Byron’s post about Kos wanting to crush the conservative movement (“Bring it on!” I say), not to mention the absurd ruby-slipper-clicking nonsense from Harold Meyerson, it occurs to me that liberals should be more careful about what they wish for. I agree with John Hood entirely (and T.S. Eliot) that the cause cannot be truly lost because no cause can truly be won.

But, what if these guys got their wish? What if the free market chorus was crushed and discredited entirely? Pelted from the public stage? Do these people really think there would be no “rightwing” in America? No Republican Party? That is moronic. What would happen if you got rid of the free marketers and fusionists is you would have an unadulterated party of populist, rightwing, progressives competing with a party of poplist, leftwing, ones. Our politics would be worse, not better, by liberalism’s own standards because the GOP would be taken over by Buchananites to the “right” of Buchanan who would make Mike Huckabee look like Milton Friedman. If everyone agreed on pervasive economic interventionism then politics becomes a question of who gets to benefit from intervention, elections become a contest to pick winners and losers, or beneficiaries and shakedown victims. In such an evironment, cultural factors become more central, not less.

Putting aside the bullshit assertion that Democrats oppose free markets (has Jonah missed the Bush administration nationalization binge?), the Corner argument for voting for McCain and Republicans has now devolved from “The Democrats are worse” in 2004 to “You can not completely destroy us, because it would create a power vacuum in which even worse right-wingers will come to prominence.” It should be interesting to watch them work this into slogan form so the base and right-wing bloggers can understand it. I would suggest- “Sure, we suck, but you will miss us when we are gone.”

Actually, Jonah, we really won’t.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Taibbi v. York
Next Post: Shorter Entire Right-Wing Blogosphere »

Reader Interactions

54Comments

  1. 1.

    Dave

    October 15, 2008 at 11:46 am

    What is not surprising at all is that Cheetos-Boy got it exactly wrong.
     
    What Kos wants crushed is not "small-c" conservatism but the low-wattage neo-con BS that has seized the title of "conservative." And then the Doughy Pantsload immediately shifts that to a desire to destroy the free markets. As if the Republicans have been actually creating a free market instead of something approaching state capitalism.
     
    Have any of these asshats ever read "Wealth of Nations?" Adam Smith would weep over the way these guys have twisted his ideas.

  2. 2.

    Comrade Incertus

    October 15, 2008 at 11:48 am

    If the ideological battles move from things like "should we have universal health care" to "how much universal health care should we have," I’m cool with it. My goal isn’t to crush conservatism so much as it is to crush this particularly loathsome version of it.

  3. 3.

    hypusine

    October 15, 2008 at 11:51 am

    politics becomes a question of who gets to benefit from intervention, elections become a contest to pick winners and losers, or beneficiaries and shakedown victims

    Where were you from 2000-2004 asshole? Certainly not bemoaning "This is our due". pfffft. Get off the stage.

  4. 4.

    Jon H

    October 15, 2008 at 11:51 am

    Jonah is the even-worse right winger he’s been waiting for.

  5. 5.

    Cris v.3.1

    October 15, 2008 at 11:52 am

    “Bring it on!” I say

    I can’t think of a more appropriate phrase for Goldberg to co-opt. His presidential hero said the same thing when he had no idea how far in over his head he was.

  6. 6.

    Joshua

    October 15, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Guys like Jonah Goldberg will always be around, because there will always be some rich asshole that thinks he doesn’t deserve to pay a cent into the society that made him (or, more likely, his father) rich. Those guys are willing to spend a lot more money than they do on taxes to advance that viewpoint. That’s who pays Goldberg, that is who will always pay Goldberg.

    However, we are hoping that their repulsive ideas, the ideas that have come to prominence in the right wing, are fully discredited, and those who espouse it are relegated to the same wilderness that anyone to the left of Bill Clinton (and that is a LOT of people) has been wandering around for the past 3 decades.

  7. 7.

    aimai

    October 15, 2008 at 11:52 am

    The idea that Jonah Goldberg and the Corner were all that was standing between us and the neo-nazis and militias seems strange to me, somehow…I had understood that the violent kookery was all on the left side of the spectrum. I read a book about it, I think, that put it right in the title.

    aimai

  8. 8.

    Zifnab

    October 15, 2008 at 11:54 am

    If everyone agreed on pervasive economic interventionism then politics becomes a question of who gets to benefit from intervention, elections become a contest to pick winners and losers, or beneficiaries and shakedown victims. In such an evironment, cultural factors become more central, not less.

    If? What’s the if? Did he see the bailout votes? This isn’t a question of "if" or even of "when". It’s a statement of "now that". And sure enough, Doughy’s hindsight prophecy has come to pass. The only question now that $700 $850 billion is on the table is who gets paid and who gets to pay out.

    Of course that last bit about "cultural factors becom[ing] more central, not less" is where he dizzies off into being completely wrong. Ask the majority of America what they’re voting on right now. Taxes or abortion? I think I know where I’m placing my bets.

  9. 9.

    MattF

    October 15, 2008 at 11:55 am

    "You might have to deal with people who believe what they say". Um, OK.

  10. 10.

    Danton

    October 15, 2008 at 11:56 am

    Jeez, I’m looking at the last several posts of the morning and John, you’re absolutely on fire. What did you have for breakfast?

  11. 11.

    scarshapedstar

    October 15, 2008 at 11:57 am

    Bow before Obi-Wan Goldberg!

    You can’t win, Darth. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.

    Sadly (for him, not me), I don’t think the Force is strong with this one.

  12. 12.

    The Other Steve

    October 15, 2008 at 11:58 am

    My god, that guy is just dumb.

  13. 13.

    Svensker

    October 15, 2008 at 11:58 am

    This is one of my favorite’s from The Corner this morning, from Kirkorian:

    And for those on the right who tell me that they welcome illegal immigration as a way of
    liberating businesses from having to coddle lazy and shiftless blacks (or, in Frederick Douglass’s
    words, "They want to be independent of their former slaves, and bring their noses to the
    grindstone"), I ask you this: What do you think these ex-cons are going to be doing if they’re not
    encouraged "to readjust to working life" — go to law school? A tight labor market has to be an
    integral part of conservative social policy

  14. 14.

    Herr Doktor

    October 15, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    Jonah: "If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine…"

  15. 15.

    Montysano (All Hail Marx & Lennon)

    October 15, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    @Dave:

    Have any of these asshats ever read "Wealth of Nations?"

    No. SATSQ.

    And they won’t read it. Poor brown people brought AIG to its knees. End of story.

  16. 16.

    Balconesfault

    October 15, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    I thought we were just crushing the Republicans. Are we crushing all convervatives now, too?

    Damn, that’s going to be really hard on the Democratic majority, given how many Dem congressmen are conservatives who could easily have been Rockefeller Republicans, back when such critters existed.

    I personally have little stomach for crushing Bill Clinton, who I’ve always thought of as a little right of center.

  17. 17.

    TR

    October 15, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    What would happen if you got rid of the free marketers and fusionists is you would have an unadulterated party of populist, rightwing, progressives

    Rightwing progressives? Are they the opposite of liberal fascists? Or the same thing?

    Jonah Goldberg. Proudly putting the "moron" into "oxymoron."

  18. 18.

    lutton

    October 15, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    Obi-wane Jonahbi – " You can’t win, Kos. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."

  19. 19.

    ThymeZone

    October 15, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    If everyone agreed on pervasive economic interventionism then politics becomes a question of who gets to benefit from intervention, elections become a contest to pick winners and losers, or beneficiaries and shakedown victims. In such an evironment, cultural factors become more central, not less.

    Wow. So the greatest threat to the American Experiment in crushing (the current version of) the right wing is …. more cultural manipulation? The cornerstone of their appeal is the worst potential effect of getting rid of them?

    Holy fuck, these people can fashion backwards arguments better than anybody I have ever seen.

    Up truly is down in their world. Just, wow.

  20. 20.

    SpotWeld

    October 15, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    To paraphrase Douglas Adams:

    "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the GOP is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and wing-nutty .There is another theory which states that this has already happened."

  21. 21.

    Comrade Stuck

    October 15, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    OT

    OMG they found the Whitey" tape. And it was just made yesterday, NOT.

    The smell of desperation in the morning smells like, like Wingnut.

  22. 22.

    chuchundra

    October 15, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    Awesome, informative blogging this morning. Kudos to you both Tim and John. Thank you.

  23. 23.

    RoonieRoo, dontcha know

    October 15, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    I wonder if he just sees the train that is bearing down on him and this is his mad flailing in the hopes he doesn’t get smacked off the tracks.

    Seriously, what we are "crushing" is specifically this bunch of neo/theo-cons that flatly destroyed the GOP and ran off the reasonable people.

    I still maintain, as a Democrat, that it is important to the health and future of the left-wing that we have a functioning right-wing. I don’t know how that is going to come together in the future. It will either be the recovery of the GOP brand/party by the states rights,small government, fiscal conservatives or the growth of a third party consisting of those conservatives that the "party left".

  24. 24.

    kid bitzer

    October 15, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    what a fucking loser that goldberg is.

    but he’s wrong about kos anyhow (as well as everything else).

    the goal is not to crush the conservative movement.

    the goal is to crush movement conservatives.

    as soon as the mythical "honest conservatives" materialize, they will be welcomed back to america.

    but as long as it’s karl rove, steve schmidt, tom delay, bill frist, rick santorum, and all of the unholy spawn of saint reagan, i stand with kos: crush them.

  25. 25.

    ThymeZone

    October 15, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    as long as it’s karl rove, steve schmidt, tom delay, bill frist, rick santorum, and all of the unholy spawn of saint reagan, i stand with kos: crush them.

    Word.

  26. 26.

    pablo

    October 15, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    I kinda like some conservatives, and a little bit of the conservative philosophy, but I have absolutely no interest in these yahoos who now call themselves conservatives, it’s the con part of neocon. Big spending, big borrowing Trotskyites. Go back to whatever rock you have crawled out from under.

  27. 27.

    kth

    October 15, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    I doubt anyone wants to "banish the free-market chorus", certainly not me, nor Kos, nor very many of the commenters here. I would like to banish the "brown people suck" chorus, the "Earth is 6000 years old" chorus, and the other choirs with their varieties of screeching, atonal fear and loathing.

    Then the free-market chorus would have to align itself with bands really concerned with freedom, like those against the unitary executive, against unrestricted wiretapping, against no-knock warrants, for civic equality for gay people, etc.

  28. 28.

    fecapult

    October 15, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    What would happen if you got rid of the free marketers and fusionists is you would have an unadulterated party of populist, rightwing, progressives.

    I’m going to ignore the concept of progressive conservatism, and talk instead about how these clowns would still have to get elected before anyone had to pay any sort of attention to them. Also.

  29. 29.

    o kanis

    October 15, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    Goldberg is expressing a real anxiety that the conservative remnants of Huckabee and Robertson and Paul will not be quite so eager to bomb Iran , leaving it to the (possibly) unreliable Democrats alone to suck AIPAC tit.

    The horror, the horror….

  30. 30.

    Punchy

    October 15, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    Putting aside the bullshit assertion that Democrats oppose free markets (has Jonah missed the Bush administration nationalization binge?)

    Not a expert on logic, but I think this is pretty FAIL. Just because the Bush Admin seems to oppose free markets doesn’t mean the Dems don’t oppose. IOW, making light that Bush is acting like Democrats, doesn’t allow one to logically conclude that therefore, it’s bullshit to assert the Dems oppose regulation (the insinuation being that the two sides must always be at idealogical odds?).

    Just my $0.02

  31. 31.

    jvill

    October 15, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    "That is moronic."

    Agreed.

    Oh, he was talking about something else.

  32. 32.

    libarbarian

    October 15, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    My favorite is that he thinks this will work

    "You know, Senator Obama, you’re just another tax-and-spend liberal … actually, let me amend that, you’re just another tax-and-spend socialist. Most Americans don’t think their government should be ‘spreading around the wealth.’ They think hard-working people should get to keep most of what they earn. They’re willing to pay their fair share in taxes to do that which the government is supposed to do. But they are not willing to fund all the five year plans and scores of schemes and your favorite groups like ACORN. They don’t like the NEA destroying their school systems, ACLU-type judges running their country, and anarchy on their nation’s borders. They are also patriotic people, and they resent when your Senate leader declares a war lost when we have young Americans winning the war on the battlefield. And you could not bring yourself to stand up for those troops and distance yourself from your leader. Americans are a great people and while they may need a helping hand from time-to-time, they don’t want you running their lives. That’s not the way our country works."

    I dare say even most Wal-Mart shoppers would go for it.

    I dare say he is seriously out-of-touch.

  33. 33.

    Comrade The Moar You Know

    October 15, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    But, what if these guys got their wish? What if the free market chorus was crushed and discredited entirely? Pelted from the public stage?

    I would have a day-long orgasm and then smoke a metric fuckton of pot.

  34. 34.

    Comrade Tax Analyst

    October 15, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    as long as it’s karl rove, steve schmidt, tom delay, bill frist, rick santorum, and all of the unholy spawn of saint reagan, i stand with kos: crush them.

    Well, OK…but can we crush them reeeeeaaaallll sllooooooowww? I’m not usually into sadism, but I think these guys qualify as a "Special" case. I want legs first, so we can hear as their usual plaintiff whines turn to frantic pleading and screaming.

    I don’t think that’s too much to ask, considering all the shit these ass-hats pulled and how badly they’ve fucked up our Republic.

  35. 35.

    Napoleon

    October 15, 2008 at 12:57 pm

    Did anyone see the Smith post from Politico where, in so many words, in a focus group some people said they didn’t care if Obama was a terrorist, they would vote for him any way before the Republicans? That is why Jonah is $!!tting bricks, because people (like joe sixpack) do want to destroy the Republican party.

  36. 36.

    Janefinch

    October 15, 2008 at 12:57 pm

    My current favourite re Ayers from The Pantload, just posted on The Corner:

    I haven’t read the book in a few years, and I only read big chunks of it when I did take a look at it. But I don’t recall it being shot through with regret about being wrong.

    You have to love that sort of incisive criticism.

  37. 37.

    Comrade The Moar You Know

    October 15, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    A tight labor market has to be an integral part of conservative social policy

    My lord, this is rich. Nothing wakes these people up like the realization that they’re about to lose it all.

    Day late, dollar short, assholes.

  38. 38.

    Notorious P.A.T.

    October 15, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    Wouldn’t it be a super duper shame if the Republican party got taken over by the extreme right wing? Why, they might nominate someone for vice president who thinks women should pay for the investigation of their rape, believes in witches, and denies evolution!

  39. 39.

    Notorious P.A.T.

    October 15, 2008 at 1:08 pm

    The idea that Jonah Goldberg and the Corner were all that was standing between us and the neo-nazis and militias seems strange to me, somehow…I had understood that the violent kookery was all on the left side of the spectrum. I read a book about it, I think, that put it right in the title.

    LO freakin’ L. Post of the gosh darn year.

  40. 40.

    JGabriel

    October 15, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    Pablo:

    I have absolutely no interest in these yahoos who now call themselves conservatives, it’s the con part of neocon. Big spending, big borrowing Trotskyites.

    Question: In what way are these guys Trotskyites?

    I mean, I may be wrong, but I don’t remember Trotsky as being the "Screw the poor, praise the rich, and get in as many wars as we can" type.

    .

  41. 41.

    binzinerator

    October 15, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    I agree with John Hood entirely (and T.S. Eliot)…

    This lazy fatass, who did not feel the inclination or need to read anything substantive by English philosopher and intellectual Herbert Spencer while working on a chapter in his own fucking book that ‘requires’ him to be knowledgeable about Spencer, would not in any way or for any reason have any intellectual curiosity to exert himself to actually read anything substantive of someone like T.S. Eliot. Or any other serious, intellectual author for that matter.

    Jonah Goldberg. A fraud. A fool. A fucktard. And a fatass.

  42. 42.

    dBa

    October 15, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    that the cause cannot be truly lost because no cause can truly be won.

    Bullshit. Oh, and Jonah’s a moron.

  43. 43.

    binzinerator

    October 15, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    I’m going to ignore the concept of progressive conservatism…

    Yeah, that one is pretty amazing. But if you have the kind of mind that can tolerate the intellectual dishonesty and cognitive dissonance of that concept, you have the kind of mind that can write a book titled "liberal fascism".

    If you can do that, you would have what it takes to be a fraud. A fool. A fucktard. And a fatass. In other words, you’d have Johan Goldberg.

  44. 44.

    binzinerator

    October 15, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    progressive conservatism: Standing athwart history, yelling ‘Stop!’. But only yelling it in a progressive way. Duh.

  45. 45.

    MLP

    October 15, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    The image of Goldberg that I always keep in mind whenever I read anything about him is this:

    Goldberg’s book Liberal Fascism was conceived at some right wing think tank meeting in 2004. Of course as people know Goldberg indicts liberals for a multitude of "fascist tendencies." But what has really bothered me, and what I think is a perfect metaphor for conservativism, is that Goldberg came up with the premise of his during a time of conservative dominance both federally and statewide. Liberals were grasping at straws and conservatives were in control of all three branches of federal government. And its at the this time that we saw federal expansion, massive spending, torture, everything that is wrong with conservatisim now was in evidence then. But instead of dealing with any of this Goldberg thought it was more important to discuss the historical failings of LIBERALS. His book is what projection and transference look like in real time. Essentially, this is like Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burned. This is why I never take Goldberg seriously, he is not an intellectual (name dropping political theorist is not a substitute for intelligence). Goldberg is a political hack, a silly man, who was born on first and thought he hit a home run, trying to convince the rest of the world he’s Babe Ruth.

  46. 46.

    Snarki, child of Loki

    October 15, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    Oh, he’s so right, you just can’t get rid of a political party, no matter how irrelevant they become.

    That’s it, I’m voting for the Whig candidate this year.

  47. 47.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    October 15, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    1. Question: In what way are these guys Trotskyites?
    I mean, I may be wrong, but I don’t remember Trotsky as being the "Screw the poor, praise the rich, and get in as many wars as we can" type.

    There’s more truthiness than truth to this charge, but it isn’t based on completely nuthin.

    In a literal sense, a tiny handful of the intellectual forefathers of the present day neocons were in their youthful days actual honest to goodness Trotskyites.

    In a more poetic sense, the neocons resemble Trotsky in wishing to overturn the existing power structure and replace it with a one world new order of their own devising, and are not shy about demanding that this goal be advanced using military force. In that respect their means resemble Trotsky’s concept of permanent revolution, although their goals are more than a little bit different. They both share a tendency to romanticize violence.

    Lastly, the neocons resemble Trotskyites in their disdain for the mundane details of how to organize a program so that it actually has a chance of succeeding and their preference for spinning castles in the sky out of airy theoretical abstractions. Both groups are so utterly incompetent that if they were asked to run a lemonade stand they would totally fnck it up and probably end up making the lemonade out of used tires and gasoline, which is not conducive to a happy ending for anybody involved.

  48. 48.

    Llelldorin

    October 15, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    You can see why the guy thinks that, though. He’s wilfully blinded himself to the huge number of (small-c) conservatives who call the Democratic Party home for the moment. The John Coles of the right simply don’t exist, in his tortured view.

    It’s fairly clear where a new conservative party would come from—in a sane universe, Ben Nelson and Patrick Leahy wouldn’t be in the same party at all. They’re only fused together by the enormous pressure created by incredibly dense bodies like Goldberg.

  49. 49.

    Monty

    October 15, 2008 at 3:48 pm

    It should be interesting to watch them work this into slogan form so the base and right-wing bloggers can understand it. I would suggest- “Sure, we suck, but you will miss us when we are gone.”

    David Frum has already gone there, in a FP cover story titled ‘Why you’ll miss him when he’s gone.’

  50. 50.

    Dave Pooser

    October 15, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    the Corner argument for voting for McCain and Republicans has now devolved from “The Democrats are worse” in 2004 to “You can not completely destroy us, because it would create a power vacuum in which even worse right-wingers will come to prominence.” It should be interesting to watch them work this into slogan form so the base and right-wing bloggers can understand it. I would suggest- “Sure, we suck, but you will miss us when we are gone.”

    How about "You won’t have Jonah Goldberg to kick around anymore?"

  51. 51.

    binzinerator

    October 15, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    They’re only fused together by the enormous pressure created by incredibly dense bodies like Goldberg.

    as long as it’s karl rove, steve schmidt, tom delay, bill frist, rick santorum, and all of the unholy spawn of saint reagan, i stand with kos: crush them.

    I understand fat is quite buoyant, much less dense than water, and is of course an insulator. When the wingnut Titanic goes down, Goldberg is hoping he’ll bob like a cork and stay warm. It’s our job to make sure he gets sent to the bottom with a weighted harpoon in his blubbery ass before he can clamber to safety aboard some passing political vessel.

    The ocean pressure 2 miles down is more than 300 atmospheres, some 4,500 pound per square inch of crushing pressure.

    That’s the kind of crushing I want to see put these fucktards. That, and a crippling case of the bends if they ever manage to surface.

  52. 52.

    maxbaer (not the original)

    October 15, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    At least have pity on the Walmart shoppers who will be greeted by Jonah in the near future.

  53. 53.

    Mandy

    October 16, 2008 at 12:04 am

    Never respond to Jonah Goldberg; reading him lowers the IQ.

  54. 54.

    SevenEleventy

    October 16, 2008 at 10:07 am

    Make sure you register your pets to vote! I’m sure ACORN can help!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • Shalimar on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 4:10am)
  • Sally on Well, I Picked a Hell of a Day To Have a Friend Over for Adult Beverages and Early Dinner (Jun 9, 2023 @ 4:07am)
  • Geoduck on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 3:51am)
  • Pete Downunder on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 3:36am)
  • ron on Late Night Silly Season Classics Open Thread: We *Want* to Believe ! (Jun 9, 2023 @ 3:35am)

Balloon Juice Meetups!

All Meetups
Seattle Meetup on Sat 5/13 at 5pm!

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!