• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

This blog will pay for itself.

It is possible to do the right thing without the promise of a cookie.

I don’t recall signing up for living in a dystopian sci-fi novel.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

He seems like a smart guy, but JFC, what a dick!

Teach a man to fish, and he’ll sit in a boat all day drinking beer.

The words do not have to be perfect.

“In this country American means white. everybody else has to hyphenate.”

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

We still have time to mess this up!

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Pessimism assures that nothing of any importance will change.

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Republicans do not trust women.

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Stand up, dammit!

It’s a good piece. click on over. but then come back!!

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2026 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for 2008

Archives for 2008

Run Without Fatigue

by Tim F|  February 11, 20088:11 pm| 16 Comments

This post is in: Science & Technology

It’s funny, I ran for twelve seasons in high school and part of one in college (dislocated collarbone, kthxbye), I’m a biological researcher and for some reason I still thought that muscle fatigue comes from muscles using up their oxygen and switching to an anaerobic process that builds up lactic acid. It was pretty much accepted knowledge in the early 90’s as far as I can remember. It turns out that we were completely wrong. Also about Kris Kross, but we don’t need to go starting any lists. The answer has nothing to do with lactic acid and everything to do with leaky muscle cell calcium channels.

Highly trained bicyclists rode stationary bikes at intense levels of exertion for three hours a day three days in a row. For comparison, other cyclists sat in the room but did not exercise.

Dr. Lehnart removed snips of thigh muscle from all the athletes after the third day and sent them to Columbia, where Dr. Marks’s group analyzed them without knowing which samples were from the exercisers and which were not.The results, Dr. Marks said, were clear. The calcium channels in the exercisers leaked. A few days later, the channels had repaired themselves. The athletes were back to normal.

The lead investigator , Dr. Andrew Marks, developed a drug that selectively blocks leaky calcium channels.

[Dr. Marks] and his colleagues looked at making mice exercise to exhaustion, swimming and then running on a treadmill. The calcium channels in their skeletal muscles became leaky, the investigators found. And when they gave the mice their experimental drug, the animals could run 10 to 20 percent longer.

The implications of this study are fairly obvious and a bit disturbing. Assuming that the drug doesn’t have any unexpected effect like making you pass out and drown in your own puke, a free 10-20% edge means an almost certain prize for any competitive endurance athlete not racing Lance Armstrong. Long term questions and possible complications could pose a problem for FDA approval, but top athletes aren’t known for attending to such minutiae.

In 1995 Olympic-caliber U.S. athletes were asked in a poll, “Would you take a drug that made you a champion, knowing that it would kill you in five years?” More than half said yes.

If human tests show any reasonable promise endurance athletes will break down doors for this stuff (they’ll be better equipped to do it than if Marks had invented, say, an uber-TV remote). Look for extra demand if “rycal” drugs turn out to have less of a social stigma than shriveled balls or drinking two and a half cartons of cardboard merlot.

Run Without FatiguePost + Comments (16)

That Didn’t Take Long

by John Cole|  February 11, 20087:06 pm| 276 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008, Republican Stupidity

Captain Ed, loyal party flack.

I would take this as a sign that the GOP now feels threatened by Obama.

BTW- Is there anyone except the troglodyte right who thinks our Cuba policy has been a success and doesn’t need to be thought through? I mean, if you want to look at long-term failed policies, Cuba could be right up there at the top. What exactly has been accomplished?

*** Update ***

LOL- Ed responds:

John Cole doesn’t see anything wrong with a presidential campaign office featuring a Cuban flag with a picture of Che Guevara? Along with the ubiquitous personal insult towards anyone with whom he disagrees, John tries to cast it as a courageous statement that our policy towards Cuba needs to be rethought. And he calls me a flack?

Yeah, I was clearly trying to frame the sign as questioning a policy. I should have called you a moron. Seriously, the point of this is that you are now making a big deal out of nothing, and as a loyal GOP soldier, it is up to you to make a stink out of what is essentially nothing. But you know that, and we know what your role is- Dan Bartlett told us.

*** Update #2 ***

From the comments:

As I tried to point out in the comments at CQ (and for the record, Ed is a friend of mine) you need to listen to the AUDIO of the tape instead of just looking at the picture. The reporter at… yes – FOX… specifically says that these are VOLUNTEERS who are OPENING the office, and that the actual Obama staffers are expected to be there by the END OF THE WEEK. Hello?

Hyperbole anyone? I do like Ed and enjoy his blog, but this particular new media attack smells a tad of desperation to get some dirt on Obama. Ed didn’t originate it, but it will run across the e-mail lines just like the now long since debunked “Obama is a double secret Muslim who attended a AQ suicide bomber grade school” story. Unfortunate.

Get used to it, as it is going to be a long year. The party apparatchiks like Ed will have a busy schedule creating fake controversies like this, and we have not even had the “Hussein” Obama, fifth columnist, onslaught yet. But don’t you dare call them party flacks! Then you become unreadable!

That Didn’t Take LongPost + Comments (276)

Changing The Rules Mid-Stream

by John Cole|  February 11, 20086:01 pm| 87 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008, Democratic Stupidity

I see a lot of stuff like this lately, usually coming from Obama supporters (I think I even saw an interview somewhere of Obama claiming the votes should decide- a clear attack on the super-delegates):

My brother Rahm Emanuel is a superdelegate. I love my brother, and I trust my brother. But I gave up letting my brother dictate my life since he determined whether he got the top or bottom bunk in our bedroom back in Chicago.

So, as much as I love and respect him, I don’t trust him and his fellow superdelegates to decide for me and the American people who should be the Democratic nominee — and, therefore, most likely the next president of the United States.

I want voters to make that decision. The superdelegates, my brother included, have not been elected by anybody to name the nominee. They’ve either been appointed by the Party or, as in my brother’s case, have automatically inherited the role simply because they are elected officials. This isn’t the place to debate the entire history of superdelegates. Suffice it to say, however, they were created by the Party machine decades ago for the express purpose of giving Party insiders the ability to thwart the popular will.

After what Democrats went through in Florida in 2000, we should be the first to reject any such funny business. We should be as opposed to superdelegates changing the course of an election as we were to the Supreme Court appointing George W. Bush president.

The right thing for my brother, and all the other superdelegates to do, is to support the decision of the voters. Whichever candidate has won the most delegates going into the national convention should be granted the endorsement of the superdelegates. Period. And we should put pressure on them to agree to do so now — before the jockeying, lobbying, and infighting get really ugly, as they inevitably will.

I read stuff like this and all I can think is- “Man, I have been down this road before.” The first thing this reminds me of us in 2000, when the conventional wisdom was that George Bush would win the popular vote, but would not have the electoral college win. I remember GOP hack after GOP hack talking about and working out the strategery for just this situation. Of course, if you all remember correctly, someone else won the popular vote and just the opposite happened. The second thing this reminds me of is Hillary’s blatant attempt to have the rules changed for the delegates in michigan and Florida, after everyone agreed those delegates would not count.

I am not suggesting you have to embrace the whole concept of super-delegates, I sure don’t and it seems like an antiquated way of going about things, but I think people should respect the fact that the rules were good enough for everyone when the race started, and they should be good enough for everyone to finish the race. If you want to get rid of the super-delegates, or change how their votes are counted, the time to do this is starting January 21st, 2009, as the Clinton or Obama Presidency are getting underway. Gaming the system right now, though, reminds me of the kind of thing the filth currently in the Oval Office would do.

Changing The Rules Mid-StreamPost + Comments (87)

Just A Flesh Wound

by John Cole|  February 11, 20084:50 pm| 62 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008

Hillary dismisses the results of this week-end:

Hillary Clinton on Monday explained away Barack Obama’s clean sweep of the weekend’s caucuses and primaries as a product of a caucus system that favors “activists” and, in the case of the Louisiana primary, an energized African-American community.

She told reporters who had gathered to watch her tour a General Motors plant here that “everybody knew, you all knew, what the likely outcome of these recent contests were.”

“These are caucus states by and large, or in the case of Louisiana, you know, a very strong and very proud African-American electorate, which I totally respect and understand.”

Submit your own Monty Python videos.

And before anyone starts, I do not think Hillary was trying to inject race into the, umm, race. She was merely pointing out the obvious, even if I disagree with her assessment that the results were meaningless. She is hemoraging support, and Obama is gaining momentum rapidly.

Just A Flesh WoundPost + Comments (62)

ATTN: Hillary Supporters

by John Cole|  February 11, 20082:12 pm| 178 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008, Democratic Stupidity

The following are not reasons to vote for your candidate:

1.) Because there have been sexist attacks leveled against Hillary Clinton– Yes. There have been sexist and nasty attacks leveled at Hillary. There may be a group of people who are not voting for her because they are sexist, misogynist, choose your word. But just because there are those folks out there, it does not mean I have to vote for her to make up for it. Additionally, just because I am choosing to vote for someone else does not mean that I am a sexist womyn hater.

2.) The media has an anti-Clinton narrative– I would agree with that aspect of Krugman’s column. There is an anti-Clinton narrative out there. But the fact that many in the media hate the Clintons is NOT a reason for me to vote for them. if anything, it is a sign of what will come should Clinton win. And while we are at it, check out the following equations:

Vote for the Republicans or the terrorists win.
Vote for Hillary or the media wins.

I don’t find either one to be very compelling.

3.) Some Obama supporters are fanbois and he has a cult of personality– Undeniably true. Some Obama supporters are way over the top. I have, myself, mocked the magical unity pony and the Jonestownesque followers. But why is this a reason to vote for Hillary?

So if all you can do when you come in here, pitching a fit about my refusal to support Hillary in the primaries (knowing full well I will vote for her in the general election should she win the nomination) is to list these three things- “ZOMG Hillary is the victim of sexist attacks” or “ZOMG the media is unfair” or “ZOMG Obama has fanbois,” just please spare us all the time and effort of reading your drivel. If you can give me some reasons why I should choose Hillary over Obama other than the previously listed items (offenses?), have at it. Otherwise, put a sock in it.

ATTN: Hillary SupportersPost + Comments (178)

Is It Really That Ugly

by John Cole|  February 11, 200812:22 pm| 164 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008

I don’t get this Krugman column:

The bitterness of the fight for the Democratic nomination is, on the face of it, bizarre. Both candidates still standing are smart and appealing. Both have progressive agendas (although I believe that Hillary Clinton is more serious about achieving universal health care, and that Barack Obama has staked out positions that will undermine his own efforts). Both have broad support among the party’s grass roots and are favorably viewed by Democratic voters.

Supporters of each candidate should have no trouble rallying behind the other if he or she gets the nod.

Why, then, is there so much venom out there?

I won’t try for fake evenhandedness here: most of the venom I see is coming from supporters of Mr. Obama, who want their hero or nobody. I’m not the first to point out that the Obama campaign seems dangerously close to becoming a cult of personality. We’ve already had that from the Bush administration — remember Operation Flight Suit? We really don’t want to go there again.

Has this really been that bitter of a nomination fight, because I sure do not see it that way. Sure, the Obama groupies are irritating as all hell. And yes, the diehard Hillary or Bust crowd will call you a misogynist and a Clinton hater at the drop of a hat. But, overall, the only way I think one could get that impression is if your only news is coming from Andrew Sullivan, who is an unrepentant swirling vortex of Clinton hate. Other than that, though, I just don’t see it as being that bad, and it certainly is not as bad as the GOP race, where the standard bearer is routinely booed by the base.

By the way, has there been anyone as loudly obnoxious towards Obama as Paul Krugman? It seems kind of amusing that he, of all people, after essentially waging jihad against Obama for months, should be penning a column about the nastinesss of the race.

At any rate, I just don’t see this as a particularly ugly race. I think there has been some appliation of the clinton rules- people keep claiming Bill is injecting race and what not, and the only thing I saw that was remotely suspicious was the Jackson remark following South Carolina. Other than that and the Mark Penn bilge, this has ben a pretty clean race, I think.

Is It Really That UglyPost + Comments (164)

This Will Leave a Mark

by John Cole|  February 11, 200811:55 am| 27 Comments

This post is in: Election 2008, Humorous

Ouch:

The whole thing is kind of meta, in that you have to have seen the Obama viral video in order to really appreciate it, but it is still pretty damning. I laughed out loud at the “we’re screwed” hand gesture and the fellow hyperventilating into the bag.

(via Atrios)

This Will Leave a MarkPost + Comments (27)

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 345
  • Page 346
  • Page 347
  • Page 348
  • Page 349
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 385
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - SkyBluePink -  10 Photos 6
Photo by SkyBluePink (4/15/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • Steve Paradis on Medium Cool – Let’s Complain!! (Apr 19, 2026 @ 9:27pm)
  • NeenerNeener on Medium Cool – Let’s Complain!! (Apr 19, 2026 @ 9:26pm)
  • Steve Paradis on Medium Cool – Let’s Complain!! (Apr 19, 2026 @ 9:25pm)
  • Jay on Excellent Read: “You Can Never Let Them Think They Have A Chance” (Apr 19, 2026 @ 9:23pm)
  • scav on Medium Cool – Let’s Complain!! (Apr 19, 2026 @ 9:23pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)
Sister Golden Bear

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc