• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

They don’t have outfits that big. nor codpieces that small.

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

If you thought you’d already seen people saying the stupidest things possible on the internet, prepare yourselves.

There are times when telling just part of the truth is effectively a lie.

The unpunished coup was a training exercise.

Museums are not America’s attic for its racist shit.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Fundamental belief of white supremacy: white people are presumed innocent, minorities are presumed guilty.

The real work of an opposition party is to hold the people in power accountable.

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

Never give a known liar the benefit of the doubt.

“When somebody takes the time to draw up a playbook, they’re gonna use it.”

They spent the last eight months firing professionals and replacing them with ideologues.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

The republican caucus is covering themselves with something, and it is not glory.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

You are either for trump or for democracy. Pick one.

They punch you in the face and then start crying because their fist hurts.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

We can show the world that autocracy can be defeated.

We do not need to pander to people who do not like what we stand for.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Nothing New

Nothing New

by John Cole|  September 13, 201011:17 am| 67 Comments

This post is in: Assholes

FacebookTweetEmail

Adding to my point that there is really nothing new to the hatred bubbling inside the mind of Marty Peretz and it is curious that some people are only now calling him on it, here is a piece from Jack Shafer pointing out that Peretz has not really kept his feelings about Arabs a secret.

The piece is from 1991. This year’s freshman class in colleges across the country was not even born, and Peretz was getting his hate on.

(via Greg Mitchell)

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Maybe Honesty Is Overrated
Next Post: D’umb »

Reader Interactions

67Comments

  1. 1.

    cleek

    September 13, 2010 at 11:20 am

    The piece is from 1991. This year’s freshman class in colleges across the country was not even born,

    i hate you

  2. 2.

    joe from Lowell

    September 13, 2010 at 11:24 am

    The piece is from 1991. This year’s freshman class in colleges across the country was not even born,

    Last spring, I asked a class of 7th graders who had just read about North and South Korea if they could name another country that was divided into a communist half and a democratic half during the Cold War.

    None of them had ever head of West Germany.

  3. 3.

    Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle

    September 13, 2010 at 11:29 am

    So that’s before even the first WTC bombing. Can anyone tell me why Versailles has any kind of love for TNR?

  4. 4.

    Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther

    September 13, 2010 at 11:34 am

    @cleek: What he said.

    But also, too, I presume you’re already aware of the Peretz Dossier? peretzdossier.blogspot.com/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

    A little goes a very long way, and there’s just so much hate and ignorance there!

  5. 5.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 11:35 am

    @Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle: Outside of Marty, TNR seems to match nicely a certain school of thought within the Village. Nominally Democratic, but centrist on fiscal issues, vaguely liberal on social issues, and strongly in favor of exerting American power. Peretz is just seen as the crazy uncle at the Thanksgiving table.

  6. 6.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 11:38 am

    @joe from Lowell:

    None of them had ever head of West Germany.

    It is not fair to talk about imaginary countries. I suppose you talk about Ruritania, Czechoslovakia, the USSR, and Belgium as well.

  7. 7.

    fasteddie9318

    September 13, 2010 at 11:39 am

    Well I guess we can add Jack Shafer to the list of people who don’t deserve the privileges of the First Amendment.

  8. 8.

    Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther

    September 13, 2010 at 11:39 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: Can I tell you though how very, very sick I am of us collectively accepting our crazy uncles at our collective Thanksgiving table?

    It’s ok to be the actual crazy uncle at an actual table, but when you’re Marty Peretz, though, or MSNBC’s Uncle Pat, you’re not just annoying the nieces and nephews, you’re doing actual damage to real lives!

    I’m not annoyed with you for pointing it out — I’m annoyed with America for being this way. America!

  9. 9.

    Martin

    September 13, 2010 at 11:40 am

    @joe from Lowell: Heh, reminds me that I convinced a girl in my girlfriends dorm during college that North and South Dakota were similarly separated and that North Dakota was a fully communist state (like Canada). This was right around the time of German unification. It took about a week to convince her. I think the clincher was when I told her that Mount Rushmore was a piece of American propaganda to promote freedom, erected to be visible to those living in North Dakota.

    She went on to be an elementary school teacher about a year later. I convinced a different girl in the same dorm that Oklahoma was a fictional state, the name created for the musical because of all the things it would rhyme with.

    I wonder if I could still pull that kind of stuff off now that Google exists. Probably.

  10. 10.

    cyd

    September 13, 2010 at 11:44 am

    Last spring, I asked a class of 7th graders who had just read about North and South Korea if they could name another country that was divided into a communist half and a democratic half during the Cold War.

    The Union and the Confederacy?

  11. 11.

    Steve

    September 13, 2010 at 11:44 am

    I thought America WAS divided into a democratic half and a communist half during the Cold War. The communist half voted for McGovern!

  12. 12.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 11:45 am

    @Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther: No disagreement from me.

  13. 13.

    JGabriel

    September 13, 2010 at 11:45 am

    I feel like there should be a logo for this – yellow lettering on a red background, with those old fashioned curlicues at the sides, that says, “Peretz & Co., Hating Islam Since 1991”.

    .

  14. 14.

    LittlePig

    September 13, 2010 at 11:45 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: Not to mention Freedonia.

  15. 15.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 11:46 am

    @LittlePig: No, that one is real.

  16. 16.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 11:46 am

    @LittlePig: No, that one is real.

  17. 17.

    me

    September 13, 2010 at 11:47 am

    The embarrassing sentence is: “I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment, which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.” I wrote that, but I do not believe that.

    God, what a huge asshole.

  18. 18.

    Ken

    September 13, 2010 at 11:48 am

    @Martin: The actual history of the division of the Dakotas is a little more sordid.

  19. 19.

    Martin

    September 13, 2010 at 11:50 am

    @joe from Lowell: Here in CA they don’t study any 20th century history prior to 8th grade. It’s all ancient civ up through mid-18th century US history. I’m not sure they even learn about events like the French Revolution until high school.

    West Germany would have to be picked up at home or from TV.

  20. 20.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 11:50 am

    @me: The kicker for me was his statement that he has no hatred in his heart. Ha!

  21. 21.

    Martin

    September 13, 2010 at 11:53 am

    @Ken: Isn’t everything the Republicans are involved in?

  22. 22.

    Kryptik

    September 13, 2010 at 11:55 am

    The sad thing is the fact that his worldview on Muslims seems dangerously ascendant these days in this country. And that disgusts and depresses me.

  23. 23.

    Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther

    September 13, 2010 at 11:57 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: I’m at this very moment addressing that line in a blog post! (which I’m having a hard time writing because I’m so furious, which explains why I keep toggling over here).

    Here’s the real question for Marty Peretz, I think: Does he understand the English language? He seems to not quite get the nuances of the word “hatred.”

  24. 24.

    El Cid

    September 13, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    Generally it doesn’t bar access to mainstream media to suggest the inferiority of Arabs and Muslims, or even to recommend their killing or crimes against humanity such as expelling the Palestinians out of the illegally occupied territories. You can cheer for policies which kill the maximum number of Iranians or whoever. Peretz must personally be an asshole to his media contacts above and beyond the regular anti-Arab racists and anti-Muslim sectarians.

  25. 25.

    LanceThruster

    September 13, 2010 at 12:02 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Maybe it’s more in his lower intestines (though it comes out his mouth)?

  26. 26.

    Hugin & Munin

    September 13, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    I think Peretz is even fuzzy on the meaning of the word ‘heart’.

  27. 27.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    @LanceThruster: Shouldn’t you just come out and say that Peretz is talking out of his ass?

  28. 28.

    jimBOB

    September 13, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    1991? I remember Peretz screeds from the early 80’s, which were basically indistinguishable from this recent piece that he got called out on. If you read TNR during that era, you learned to quickly skip anything with his byline.

  29. 29.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:07 pm

    @Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther: I look forward to reading it.

  30. 30.

    Violet

    September 13, 2010 at 12:07 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    The kicker for me was his statement that he has no hatred in his heart. Ha!

    Is there actual evidence he has a heart? It would be irresponsible not to speculate.

  31. 31.

    gex

    September 13, 2010 at 12:09 pm

    @Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther: I believe the phrase is: America, fuck yeah!

  32. 32.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:12 pm

    @jimBOB: I subscribed to TNR on and off through the late 80s and 90s. Marty caused me to cancel or not renew several times. I would then be sucked in one more time. During that period, I fit in with the general profile I described above; I have moved left since then.

  33. 33.

    Ash Can

    September 13, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    @Martin:

    She went on to be an elementary school teacher about a year later.

    ::whine::

  34. 34.

    El Cid

    September 13, 2010 at 12:17 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: It was a liberal hawk publication through and through.

  35. 35.

    SiubhanDuinne

    September 13, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    Well, I guess it’s nice and all that he apologized for the “First Amendment privileges” line, and attempted to clarify the “Muslim life is cheap” line, but it’s all too little, too late.

    Any Teabagger or Islamophobe or media entity can — and will, mark my words — cite Peretz under that useful canard “Even the liberal New Republic . . . .”

  36. 36.

    Pancake

    September 13, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    The comments from Peretz fade into mild balderdash compared with some of the choice and fragrant anti-Semitic crap that has washed through these comment threads at certain times in the past. His is truly weak porridge compared to what many commenters here have had to say about the Israelis.

  37. 37.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    @El Cid: As was I, to some extent, during that time. Peretz, though, goes well beyond that.

    WRT liberal hawkery, I was pro-Afghanistan invasion post 9-11 and I was persuadable on Iraq. I looked at the evidence, specifically the fact that inspections were going on and finding nothing, and decided that the case was not made and invading would be a tragic error.

  38. 38.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    @Pancake: You are equating the the occasional remark of random commenters on a blog with the 30 + year history of virulent anti-Arab bigotry by the publisher of a magazine that is seen as important within the DC establishment. False equivalence. Try harder.

  39. 39.

    jimBOB

    September 13, 2010 at 12:31 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    If there had been blogs back then, I might not have bothered with TNR. But at the time it was a readable source for seemingly knowledgeable political commentary that went beyond the pablum of TIME/Newsweek etc. Like you, I’ve moved left in recent years, and at this point I’m so disgusted by military adventurism that I wonder if we’d be better off with no Pentagon.

  40. 40.

    Nemo_N

    September 13, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    Wow. How old is the “Israel is always blamed first” meme?

  41. 41.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    @jimBOB: I went with TNR to balance the center-right I got from The Economist. I also subscribed to The Nation, but it was too left for me. Between them, however, I felt like I got a pretty good picture of the world from a reality based perspective.

  42. 42.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    @jimBOB: I went with TNR to balance the center-right I got from The Economist. I also subscribed to The Nation, but it was too left for me. Between them, however, I felt like I got a pretty good picture of the world from a reality based perspective.

  43. 43.

    Scott

    September 13, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    Shorter Marty Peretz: “Jeez, I was just joking. Can’t you fucking raghead-lovers take a joke?! HAW HAW HAW!”

  44. 44.

    LanceThruster

    September 13, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    @Pancake:

    His is truly weak porridge compared to what many commenters here have had to say about the Israelis.

    That the criticism was directed at the Israelis instead of “the Jews” was not enough to sweeten the aroma of that “fragrant anti-Semitic crap”?

  45. 45.

    Martin

    September 13, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    @Ash Can: It underscores the single biggest problem in the US educational system, IMO – the widespread lack of teaching on critical thinking.

    At my university, I’ve teamed up with a few others to rework the general ed science framework to eliminate science fundamentals as a learning outcome for non-majors, and replacing it with (roughly) recognizing science from non-science, and ability to discern good and bad science. Basically, rather than expect a bunch of history majors will learn anything about geology, we want them to be able to participate in a discussion about global warming, with the self-recognition that they are not a scientist and aren’t in a position to debate CO2 levels, but that they can elevate the value of evidence from a paper that is published in a prestigious peer-reviewed journal over anecdotal, non-sourced, or non-peer reviewed evidence.

    Rather than turn non-scientists into scientists, we just want them to be able to properly classify all the information they receive as a citizen into a spectrum of ‘good science’ to ‘bad science’ and be able to act (vote, discuss, make donations, etc.) responsibly. We’re now trying to convince the social sciences to go along as well since there’s an equally big problem in their fields (Marty Peretz, case in point).

    Maybe in a generation we’ll have teachers that my kids can’t bamboozle.

  46. 46.

    Ed Marshall

    September 13, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    @Pancake:

    Nutpicking in blog comments doesn’t prove much, but I don’t think you are right. “Israelis are” or more precisely “Jews are” statements (because Peretz doesn’t believe in Palestinians, that’s part of his racist thesis) are pretty fucking uncommon.

    On the other hand, all Peretz *does* is go on about the essential, subhuman nature of Arabs.

  47. 47.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    @Martin: Isn’t that the whole point of a liberal arts education?

  48. 48.

    LanceThruster

    September 13, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    @Martin: Extremely worthy and valuable pursuit.

    I feel part of the resistance to critical thinking is the fear religionists have that it might spill over and be applied to religious beliefs. Better in their minds that they remain easily led sheep.

  49. 49.

    TooManyJens

    September 13, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    @Pancake: Did you ever answer the question of whether you are a previously-banned commenter going by a new handle? Specifically, whether you are the commenter whose former handle pissed on the memory of another commenter’s grandfather?

  50. 50.

    Violet

    September 13, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:
    It should be one of the main points of education in general, along with a basic knowledge in various fields. However, our education system has moved more toward a “teach to the test” style of education rather than a critical thinking style. It’s hard to blame the schools for this move, as they are being judged by the results of the tests. But the downside is that critical thinking isn’t rewarded in the same way that test results are.

  51. 51.

    fasteddie9318

    September 13, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne:

    Well, I guess it’s nice and all that he apologized for the “First Amendment privileges” line, and attempted to clarify the “Muslim life is cheap” line, but it’s all too little, too late.

    Plus it’s bullshit, since he wants you to remember the line as “Muslim life is cheap to Muslims” when what he actually wrote was “Muslim life is cheap, especially to Muslims.” The first makes a judgment on the value of Muslim life only as far as other Muslims perceive it. The other makes a value judgment about Muslim life, then tacks on the idea that Muslims think it too so it’s not in any way bigoted.

  52. 52.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    @Violet: Having gone through the International Baccalaureate program and then on to a liberal arts college, it is really the only form of academic education with which I had contact until I went to law school. I know this is one of the things that makes me a weirdo, but there you go.

  53. 53.

    SiubhanDuinne

    September 13, 2010 at 1:06 pm

    @fasteddie9318: Yes, quite right. The meme is out there no matter how hard he tries to walk it back, and indeed the way he formulated that sentence is exceptionally weaselly.

  54. 54.

    burnspbesq

    September 13, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    @jimBOB:

    I imagine that if you had time to do the research, you could find evidence of Peretz getting this kind of hate on in 1967, if not earlier.

  55. 55.

    Ed Marshall

    September 13, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    Peretz, Martin. “The American Left & Israel.” Editorial. Commentary. 01 Nov. 1967.

  56. 56.

    Pancake

    September 13, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    @TooManyJens:

    Yes. I am not sure how anyone could really be guilty of disparaging someone who was a paid agent of the Soviets for much of his adult life, a fact confirmed numerous times in recent years by members of the former Soviet apparatchik.

  57. 57.

    Emily L. Hauser/ellaesther

    September 13, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    Ok, I laid into Peretz again: emilylhauserinmyhead.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/not-good-enough-marty-peretzs-apology/

    I’m sure it’ll make a difference this time.

  58. 58.

    thalarctos

    September 13, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    @Steve: Well, it is called the People’s Republic of Massachusetts for a reason, nyet ?

  59. 59.

    El Cid

    September 13, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Yeah, well, I wasn’t. I don’t give a shit what people wrongly believed that Central America and Southern Africa were Soviet beach-heads and we had the right to decide what their governments would be.

  60. 60.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    @El Cid: Quoi?

  61. 61.

    El Cid

    September 13, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: These were the hawk and liberal hawk causes of the 1980s. Among which the New Republic‘s writers continually backed, albeit often calling for less blood.

  62. 62.

    Just Some Fuckhead

    September 13, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    Why is it okay for Osama bin Laden to hate Jews but not okay for Marty Peretz to hate Arabs?

  63. 63.

    Omnes Omnibus

    September 13, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    @El Cid: I came a little later than that. To the extent that I was a liberal hawk, it was in support of intervention in Bosnia and Kosovo. FWIW I also thought the 1991 Persian Gulf conflict was justified.

    Also, your sentence was not particularly clear. Perhaps a few words were omitted in your haste to condemn TNR?

  64. 64.

    Cacti

    September 13, 2010 at 6:53 pm

    Marty’s defense in short:

    Just because I wrote it doesn’t mean I REALLY feel that way.

    Someone needs his “First Amendment privileges” revoked.

  65. 65.

    El Cid

    September 13, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: I should have used “that” instead of “what”.

    My thoughts on the Persian Gulf War are actually somewhat complex, and though the driving of Iraqi forces out of Kuwait (a massive, massive foolish overcalculation by Saddam who might have had some claim to move on the one slant-drilling operation) could be reasonable, in no way were the bombing of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians or the slaughter of retreating troops in any way part of some international security actions.

    So, to say I was in favor of the Persian Gulf War as it actually occurred would be false.

    On Bosnia / Kosovo, I do recognize that there might have been legitimacy in arguments that the NATO military actions could have triggered worse atrocities, the debates were just far more intricate than I was closely following. And it wasn’t just a slaughter of civilians like most of the casualties of the Persian Gulf War, so beyond all its typical context in rotten establishment foreign policies, maybe it really did lead to a better situation.

    I do note that the US seemed to have little to no interest in backing the large Serbian peace & dissident movements, whereas it is practically the sole funding of the lunatic Venezuelan opposition. (Lunatic not because it’s the opposition, but lunatic because they are just the crazy right wing which constantly throws away any ability to appeal to the majority in favor of some revanchist fantasy.)

  66. 66.

    liberal

    September 13, 2010 at 9:37 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I also subscribed to The Nation, but it was too left for me.

    I subscribed for a number of years; the main problem I had was that it was pretty boring most of the time.

  67. 67.

    vaux-rien

    September 13, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    Can we get a Lemonheads reference for one of these Marty posts? I suggest “It’s enough to make you start to hate your friends”.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - frosty - 2024 National Park Road Trip - Canada (1/3) Banff
Photo by frosty (1/19/26)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Order Your Pet Calendars!

Order Calendar A

Order Calendar B

 

Recent Comments

  • O. Felix Culpa on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:06am)
  • Belafon on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:06am)
  • satby on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:04am)
  • YY_Sima Qian on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:03am)
  • snoey on Tuesday Morning Open Thread (Jan 20, 2026 @ 10:03am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Mary Peltola Alaska Senate

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!