• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

You cannot shame the shameless.

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.

Yeah, with this crowd one never knows.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

“Everybody’s entitled to be an idiot.”

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Let’s delete this post and never speak of this again.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Black Jesus loves a paper trail.

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

Our job is not to persuade republicans but to defeat them.

Sitting here in limbo waiting for the dice to roll

Second rate reporter says what?

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Everybody saw this coming.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Hipster Beaux-Arts Bing Crosby

Hipster Beaux-Arts Bing Crosby

by DougJ|  October 31, 20109:14 pm| 119 Comments

This post is in: Blogospheric Navel-Gazing

FacebookTweetEmail

Although I don’t think I’ll read the new Keith Richards biography, I am enjoying reading about it, especially this piece by Tom Watson (via), which describes Keef as looking like a “hipster Beaux-Arts Bing Crosby”.

Everyone seems to want to write about this, and it makes me sad that the book came out so close to the election, because otherwise Bobo or Ruth Marcus or some other conservative culture scold might write a “this is everything that sucks about 60s liberalism” type column. The best part would be the “I hitch-hiked to see the Stones back when I had more hair and less disposable income” part. (It’s also possible that someone at NRO has already written a “Keith Richards: Conservative?” column or that Bobo will ultimately do so.)

The strange Village hatred of the Colbert/Stewart rally comes from the same place: pundits desperately want to be seen as hip, so they’re not going to like a rally devoted to making fun of the media.

All of this gets me thinking…at some point, is there going to be another attempt soon to make conservatism “cool again”? We’ve seen a few tentative steps: Meghan McCain’s tweets, Nick Gillespies attempts to look good in leather, Peter Suderman’s desire to tell the world he’s meh about Gorillaz, this strange piece in The American Scene, but it seems kind of directionless to me. Is John Thune going to go on SNL and say “sock it to me” to capture the youth vote in 2012?

Update. Nobody does it like an English conservative (via):

The guitarist Keith Richards is perhaps most famous for having constructed a short and very simple rhythmic musical phrase, over the top of which his colleague Mick Jagger expressed an increasing irritation at being unable to acquire, in both general and specific terms, any kind of ‘satisfaction’ — despite, as he proceeded to explain, repeatedly attempting to do so. Or, at least, that’s what he should be most famous for. That almost insultingly simple ‘riff’, plus a slightly more complex one a few years later, over the top of which Mr Jagger, in a more ebullient frame of mind, expounded upon the pleasures of whipping black women at midnight. Both of these songs were perceived as being ‘counter-cultural’ and therefore, de facto, of the left. I suppose you might argue that ‘Satisfaction’ was in essence a plea for more stringent regulation of the advertising industry, perhaps via a quango rather than direct legislation — which is a slightly leftish position. But it is hard to stretch the lyrics of ‘Brown Sugar’ to resemble something which approaches those of the ‘Internationale’.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Steelers/Saints Open Thread
Next Post: Late Night Open Thread: Happy New Year »

Reader Interactions

119Comments

  1. 1.

    MikeJ

    October 31, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    How weird. This post shows up on the front page, but not as a next story link on the steelers thread. Of course as soon as I post this comment, I’ll bet it shows up. Just a cache that needs flushing I’d bet.

  2. 2.

    Redshirt

    October 31, 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Abramoff did his best to bring back the fedora. He did look good!

  3. 3.

    DougJ

    October 31, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    @Redshirt:

    You’re right, that’s a pretty good example. He worked a lot and rode motorcylces too.

  4. 4.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 9:24 pm

    I realize that the 1960s happened a long time ago but as I remember it, The Stones played only a minor prat of the scene. They became bigger as time wore on.

    Regardless of when they became A Big Deal, I never thought that Keith Richards was cool.

    This is not to say I didn’t like rockers.

    Did I every tell you about the time . . . . .

  5. 5.

    MikeJ

    October 31, 2010 at 9:25 pm

    @Linda Featheringill: Is there a mud shark in this story?

  6. 6.

    Bnut

    October 31, 2010 at 9:27 pm

    I hate to say it, but Meghan McCain has been treated BRUTALLY by the right wing. Not only for being a bit “overweight”(I think she’s pretty cute), but also, obviously, for her RINO status. She’s been pretty pro-gay legislation so far.

  7. 7.

    sturunner

    October 31, 2010 at 9:28 pm

    When you absolutely, positively MUST avoid reality(tm).com, everything (& any THING) will do.

  8. 8.

    Maude

    October 31, 2010 at 9:29 pm

    Someone please tell me how you could ever make McCain cool.
    King Tut yes, cool, no.

  9. 9.

    Redshirt

    October 31, 2010 at 9:32 pm

    @DougJ: In fact, Abramoff was rockin’ a whole “Godfather going to Court” look. I must confess to finding it dashing, though I’d never dream of trying to pull it off myself. Not corrupt enough.

  10. 10.

    John - A Motley Moose

    October 31, 2010 at 9:32 pm

    Is John Thune going to go on SNL and say “sock it to me” to capture the youth vote in 2012?

    Yes. Bank on it.

  11. 11.

    gbear

    October 31, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    Keef submitted himself to an interview with Terry Gross last week. I usually like Terry, but she was asking way too many questions that allowed Keef to tear her to shreds.

  12. 12.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 9:36 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Mud shark:

    Okay. I had to google that. [Point for you!]

    I did hear some stories floating around once upon a time but thought they might just be stories.

  13. 13.

    gbear

    October 31, 2010 at 9:37 pm

    is there going to be another attempt soon to make conservatism “cool again”?

    It’s called Dancing With The Stars. That’s where they’re at.

  14. 14.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 9:42 pm

    @Bnut:

    being a bit “overweight”(I think she’s pretty cute)

    She is cute.

    Can you imagine having sweet dreams about Ann Coulter?

  15. 15.

    Loneoak

    October 31, 2010 at 9:42 pm

    Is John Thune going to go on SNL and say “sock it to me” to capture the youth vote in 2012?

    This is a good game.

    Is Mitch Daniels going to go on Leno and ride a vintage motorcycle on stage in leather chaps to capture the Log Cabin vote?

  16. 16.

    change

    October 31, 2010 at 9:42 pm

    Grim Democrats Await HUGE Losses:

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/44448.html

  17. 17.

    DougJ

    October 31, 2010 at 9:44 pm

    @Bnut:

    I agree with you. They’ve been awful to her.

  18. 18.

    mvr

    October 31, 2010 at 9:45 pm

    @MikeJ:
    Wrong band.

  19. 19.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 9:45 pm

    @change:

    Grim Democrats Await HUGE Losses:

    Isn’t is a good thing that Politico doesn’t hold the Keys to Heaven [by whatever definition]?

    Edited for spelling.

  20. 20.

    mvr

    October 31, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    Finished the book last night. It is actually well-written. Of course I would have read it if it were badly written as well. Some good stuff on how he thinks about music, and of course he’s led an interesting life. Someone put a lot of work in on this one and it seems to be Keith himself, though I’m sure the coauthor, James Fox helped out a good bit.

  21. 21.

    jwb

    October 31, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    @change: Your pie’s not selling any better on this thread than on the others you’ve worked. I think the strawberry rhubarb is well past its sell date.

  22. 22.

    PeakVT

    October 31, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    Wait, are people actually saying “sock it to me” again? Or was that a reference to an internet tradition of which I am unaware?

  23. 23.

    Bnut

    October 31, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    @jwb:
    I thought rhubarb was a winter fruit? Lol.

  24. 24.

    gbear

    October 31, 2010 at 9:56 pm

    @mvr: If you want to read a really badly written book about the Stones, take a look at Ron Wood’s autobiography. An incredible mess that makes Ron look like a complete dope.

  25. 25.

    MikeJ

    October 31, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    @Linda Featheringill: I hope you got “shark episode” from wikipedia or “shark rumor” from snopes, and not anything idiots would say about women they didn’t like. I was referencing the apocryphal Led Zep story, not trying to be an ass. I’d never heard the urban dictionary definition, and would never say anything like that about anyone.

    The hotel Led Zep was at was right here in Seattle, the Edgewater Inn, where you can in theory, fish from your window.

  26. 26.

    Amanda in the South Bay

    October 31, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    All of this gets me thinking…at some point, is there going to be another attempt soon to make conservatism “cool again”?

    You forgot about Rod Dreher’s Crunchy Cons.

    I’ve spent a fair amount of time around both Orthodox and Catholic converts (having been one of both at various times in my life myself) and know a fair bit about religious whack jobs who masquerade as counter-counter cultural gurus.

  27. 27.

    Mark S.

    October 31, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    And in that context, Richards was at his most generous to Jagger. “Ain’t nobody else could sing Midnight Rambler,” he said, remembering conscious efforts to write for “the best front man in the business.”

    That’s probably true. Almost anyone else would sound ridiculous singing that song.

    And everyone knows rock n roll is a very conservative art form (you guys probably forgot this piece of shit).

  28. 28.

    Belvoir

    October 31, 2010 at 9:59 pm

    Conservatism can never be “cool” because at heart it is about restriction, resentment, it stands against things and people rather than for them. Status quo plus, hammering down the nail that sticks up, supressing the individual in favor of the system. This is why they suck and fail at comedy, art, literature, music and film-making if their conservatism is the point of their endeavor. There certainly have been excellent artists and writers who could be described as conservative in their personal beliefs, but it was never the point of their art. The word has been mangled by today’s right-wing into something they would not recognize.

    “Liberal arts and humanities” is the vast long history of appreciating people who did not conform, who challenged the prevailing system and ideas through their art. Novelty, creativity, iconoclasm shaped Western art and thought for centuries, and those things are decidedly not appreciated by conservatism. It would be oxymoronic to say so. Humanism, individuality, rebellion, love, and the tempest of passionate emotions are the root of the Arts that have described them for centuries. They are inherently “liberal” in that they cast a kind eye on humanity, for all its foibles and failures and ecstasies. The conservative counterpart in the arts would be punitive, punishing, resentful in spirit. Which is why there’s really no such thing.

    They have Ayn Rand, I guess? We have Michelangelo.

  29. 29.

    Calouste

    October 31, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    Modern medicine puzzled by one of life’s great mysteries:

    Who, What, Why: How is Keith Richards still alive?

  30. 30.

    Mark S.

    October 31, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    @gbear:

    I didn’t know he ever wrote a book. I tried reading Bill Wyman’s book a long time ago. According to Bill, he was the creative genius of the band and got more girls than the rest of the band combined.

  31. 31.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 31, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    @jwb: Them’s fighting words. I love strawberry rhubarb pie. I get it homemade from a local place, and it’s heavenly.

    @MikeJ: I got the Urban Dictionary definition, too, and I was a bit taken aback. I didn’t think that was what you were trying to say.

  32. 32.

    C Nelson Reilly

    October 31, 2010 at 10:09 pm

    @mvr:
    I finished the book yesterday too. The guy doesn’t sleep much.

  33. 33.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 10:10 pm

    @MikeJ:

    Mud shark:

    Actually, I poked around a bit and threw out everything that didn’t fit the context.

    We’re good. :-)

    [I did learn some stuff on the way to the proper explanation, though.]

  34. 34.

    MikeJ

    October 31, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    @asiangrrlMN: I thought that most here would be charitable enough with me to assume that’s not what I meant (thanks guys!), but I wanted to be on the record and make sure that I didn’t inadvertently say something awful to somebody.

  35. 35.

    Bnut

    October 31, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    @DougJ:
    I read HotAir all the time, and the commentators there make it seem like they have only slept with supermodels. They should be lucky that the “overweight” chick even looks in their direction.

  36. 36.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 31, 2010 at 10:16 pm

    @MikeJ: It didn’t fit with what I have read from you, so I assumed you meant something else. That seemed like the sensible explanation.

  37. 37.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 10:17 pm

    @Belvoir:
    Lovely essay. And you are absolutely correct, of course.

    Deviating from the norm is what creates art and what creates inventions and what creates progress.

  38. 38.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 10:18 pm

    @Calouste:

    Keith is still alilve because he is a vampire. Didn’t you know that?

  39. 39.

    Comrade Luke

    October 31, 2010 at 10:18 pm

    Most of the guys on Mad Men are conservative…

  40. 40.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 31, 2010 at 10:19 pm

    @Linda Featheringill: Needs more blood.

  41. 41.

    gbear

    October 31, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    @Mark S.: Here’s a link to Ron’s book. It’s a jaw-droppingly awful read.

  42. 42.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 31, 2010 at 10:21 pm

    @Comrade Luke: Are any of them cool? Stylish, sure. Cool, I don’t think so.

  43. 43.

    Comrade Luke

    October 31, 2010 at 10:22 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Roger Sterling kicks ass. Other than that, not really cool. But stylish is an aspect of cool isn’t it?

  44. 44.

    beltane

    October 31, 2010 at 10:23 pm

    @Linda Featheringill: I think we have to change our strategy dealing with Change. While it is fun to laugh at him, I think we’d be better off ignoring him as his trolling tends to dominate every thread he appears in.

  45. 45.

    Mark S.

    October 31, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    @beltane:

    Yes.

  46. 46.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 31, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    @Comrade Luke: Stylish can be an aspect of cool, but there is more. People of Mad Man seem to miss much of the rest of it. Their job is to be in touch with mass culture in order to sell to it. That almost makes it impossible to take the chances and push the envelope in a way that would make them cool.

  47. 47.

    SiubhanDuinne

    October 31, 2010 at 10:29 pm

    I know it’s not an open thread, and sorry for the O/T, but
    This is pretty rich. According to Newshounds, foxnews.com has, or had, a story up that identified Obama as “former President.”

    http://www.newshounds.us/2010/10/31/freudian_slip_fox_news_calls_obama_the_former_president.php

    Zero tolerance for errors my ass.

  48. 48.

    Bnut

    October 31, 2010 at 10:31 pm

    I will say this, there are not many better things than sitting next to a warm radiator with a cat in the lap, a dog on the bed, and Bit of Fry and Laurie on the Netflix. I’m 26. It’s Halloween. I love life.

  49. 49.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne

    According to Newshounds, foxnews.com has, or had, a story up that identified Obama as “former President.”

    Fox News has mastered time travel? Wow!

  50. 50.

    dr. luba

    October 31, 2010 at 10:37 pm

    @PeakVT: An update of a historical reference. Nixon tried to woo the youth vote in 1968 by going on to Laugh-In.

  51. 51.

    Linda Featheringill

    October 31, 2010 at 10:37 pm

    @Bnut:

    there are not many better things than sitting next to a warm radiator with a cat in the lap, a dog on the bed, and Bit of Fry and Laurie on the Netflix

    I have four napping cats scattered around the room and a lazy dog at my feet. And Pandora on a Blues Channel that I have developed. Life is good.

    [And I am at least 26. :-)]

  52. 52.

    beltane

    October 31, 2010 at 10:41 pm

    @SiubhanDuinne: If I were into CTs I’d have a field day with an error like that.

  53. 53.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 31, 2010 at 10:45 pm

    @Bnut: I love A Bit of Fry and Laurie. I own all the DVDs.

  54. 54.

    shoutingattherain

    October 31, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    @MikeJ:

    And the Edgewater Inn. Got it w/out looking it up.

    Call on every vegetable. Call it by name.

    Go Frank!

  55. 55.

    gbear

    October 31, 2010 at 10:50 pm

    Have to post this before the day ends:

    It’s Halloween! by The Shaggs

    Totally hipster.

  56. 56.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    October 31, 2010 at 10:55 pm

    Oh Gaaaaaaaaaaaawd…

    Back mebbe 6, or even 7 or 8 years ago, the local radio station that carried Michael Savage ran an ad campaign featuring a big picture of a smiling Michael, in sunglasses, overcoat, and scarf, w/ the words…

    “It’s the new counter culture, baby!”

    Very appealing, if you were into KGB chic at the time…

  57. 57.

    Dennis SGMM

    October 31, 2010 at 10:55 pm

    Conservatism cool? Sure, it could happen. Conservatism will be cool when young people start getting chin grafts and dyeing their skin orange.

  58. 58.

    DougJ

    October 31, 2010 at 10:56 pm

    @gbear:

    I do like the Shaggs.

  59. 59.

    DougJ

    October 31, 2010 at 10:57 pm

    @The Republic of Stupidity:

    That’s what I’m talking about.

  60. 60.

    Bnut

    October 31, 2010 at 10:57 pm

    @asiangrrlMN:
    Sometimes I hate myself. Like how I love Hugh Laurie, but can’t stand watching House. Such a waste of talent.

  61. 61.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    October 31, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    @Mark S.:

    And everyone knows rock n roll is a very conservative art form (you guys probably forgot this piece of shit).

    Noooooooooope…

    And it STILL cracks me up…

  62. 62.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    October 31, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    @DougJ:

    I figgered as much…

    For reasons I’ll never understand, and much to my chagrin, Michael Savage did start out in the Bay Area…

    ***head meets keyboard…***

  63. 63.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 31, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    @DougJ: Big deal, everyone likes to shag.

  64. 64.

    Violet

    October 31, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    DougJ at top:

    at some point, is there going to be another attempt soon to make conservatism “cool again”? We’ve seen a few tentative steps: Meghan McCain’s tweets, Nick Gillespies attempts to look good in leather, Peter Suderman’s desire to tell the world he’s meh about Gorillaz, this strange piece in The American Scene, but it seems kind of directionless to me. Is John Thune going to go on SNL and say “sock it to me” to capture the youth vote in 2012?

    Of course they’ll try. But their voters get older and whiter every year. They’re less concerned with coolness than they are with making sure their Social Security and Medicare are still there.

    But yeah, they’ll send someone to SNL. Who it will be is anyone’s guess right now. Would you have predicted, in 2006, that the breakout Republican SNL impersonation would be Sarah Palin?

  65. 65.

    VixenStrangely

    October 31, 2010 at 11:08 pm

    I think think the hipstering of the right is going on this minute: I know I have seen a few “Young conservatives” profiles in magazines, and then there was that CNN piece that O’Keefe screwed up by making himself the story (and frankly, he couldn’t be cool on Pluto.) There’s SE Cupp going on Real Time (What is with Maher and the “hot” conservababes? Seriously? Coulter, O’Donnell, this woman–but I like her glasses.) There’s always something a little “forced” to me about the “GOP” is cool stuff. It’s always Nixon on Laugh-In or Bob Dole or Steve Forbes doing something on SNL. You know–awkward, forced, funny because it shouldn’t work.

    (I do have a soft spot for Meghan McCain, because of the fat jokes and because of that one extra bosom-y picture she took crap for–I feel that. And she always strikes me as someone who might come out more liberal one day because she does seem to care about people.)

  66. 66.

    asiangrrlMN

    October 31, 2010 at 11:09 pm

    @Bnut: Dude! I am so with you. I tried to watch House–I really did. I adore Hugh Laurie (and I think he’s hot), but I just couldn’t stand the show. Sigh.

  67. 67.

    mvr

    October 31, 2010 at 11:11 pm

    @gbear:
    Thanks, haven’t read that, though I have read many bad books on the Stones, and there are many more I haven’t read. Haven’t read the Wyman one either, though I’m even less motivated to read that than to read Wood’s. There are of course the innumerable hanger on books, the number of which is only exceeded by the Elvis hanger-on books. Probably a few of each of these are good, but I forget which ones.

  68. 68.

    gbear

    October 31, 2010 at 11:12 pm

    [email protected]: They’re pretty amazing at what they do but you have to forget everything you know about how a band typically works. I could never play drums in this band.

  69. 69.

    russell

    October 31, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    Mud shark’s cool, but there’s a circular motion that’s destined to take it’s place in your mythology.

    Bill Wyman’s cool, if only because he’s his own grandpa by marriage.

    Keef will be the first human to bypass death altogether and go directly to zombie. Could be he’s already done it.

    No matter what, though, the man is, in a way of his own making, one of the great guitar players of the ages.

  70. 70.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 31, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    @gbear: Neither could I.

  71. 71.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    October 31, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    @Violet:

    Of course they’ll try. But their voters get older and whiter every year.

    Not to mention chubbier, balder, and angrier…

  72. 72.

    gbear

    October 31, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    @mvr: I recently finished reading ‘The True Adventures of the Rolling Stones’ by Stanley Booth, about the tour that ended with the Altamont show. I really enjoyed the book.

  73. 73.

    mvr

    October 31, 2010 at 11:30 pm

    @gbear: That is one of the good ones as I recall, though I’m not sure if Booth counts fully as a hanger on.

  74. 74.

    jl

    October 31, 2010 at 11:33 pm

    I read someplace that Keith Richards was a Dickens fanatic, and names his guitars after Dickens characters.

    Not sure how conservative being cool again relates to Richards. Is he politically conservative? And if so, who would care? He is probably a tax refugee, does that count?

    And I don’t think conservatism was every really cool or hip. I kind of sophomoric and cynical libertarianism was popular with some aging hippies, the tail end boomers and whatever generation came right after them.

    Makes sense in a way. Some people spent their youth fighting against social convention, celebrating their own free expression and FREEDOM to do what they want, and, never gained the inner resources to think things through a little and put them in perspective when they got older. Then once they got a little dough, a mortgage and a family, libertarianism of certain species fits in nicely.

    So I would say a certain kind of adolescent libertarianism was cool, but not conservatism.

    Aw damn, did the game just end while I was typing this?

    Edit: AWRITE! I want to see some evidence that Cole pays homage to the SF Giants, the World Champions of Baseball when he comes to this here left coast crazy town by the bay. My attention drifted off towards the end of the game, but I wanted to see the end. I am undisciplined sometimes.

  75. 75.

    Suck It Up!

    October 31, 2010 at 11:35 pm

    Off Topic: AMC’s Walking Dead? Good stuff. Scary. Lots of blood. Zombies eating a horse. yum.

  76. 76.

    jl

    October 31, 2010 at 11:38 pm

    I for one, welcome Meghan McCain as our new conservative overlord.

    The GOP should try and run her for something instead of making fun of her. But in the grand scheme of things, unjust as it is, probably for the best right now.

    But think about it, who would do better as House leader, Meghan McCain or a certain dim, chain smoking boozer barfly who looks like he uses shoe polish for his fake tan?

  77. 77.

    reality-based

    October 31, 2010 at 11:39 pm

    I hate to bring it up – but did anybody see Maureen Dowd’s heavy-breathing epiphany about Keith Richards last week?

    When a Pirate is the Voice of Chivalry

    Summary:

    1. Tea Party is full of thugs who curb-stomp women. (Good lead, and true. )

    2. Keith Richards is a MUCH nicer guy than those Tea Party thugs – he bought his Mum a house even after she killed all his pets, he had all of Mick’s girls crying on his shoulder. and he’s really nice to groupies. (Really? )

    “I want to hug you and kiss you and make you feel good and protect you. And get a nice note the next day, stay in touch.”

    again – REALLY? Well, what good is HAVING a Prince of Darkness, if he’s really just a skinnier Rhett Butler?

    the whole thing was weird.

  78. 78.

    MikeJ

    October 31, 2010 at 11:40 pm

    @jl:

    Not sure how conservative being cool again relates to Richards. Is he politically conservative? And if so, who would care? He is probably a tax refugee, does that count?

    Mick is very conservative. Degree in econ I think?

    Anyway, nothing the least bit unusual about rich white guys being conservative.

  79. 79.

    mclaren

    October 31, 2010 at 11:41 pm

    The Colbert persona is a direct satire of ignorant sociopathic fools like Bobo, so the hatred isn’t surprising at all.

  80. 80.

    Bnut

    October 31, 2010 at 11:44 pm

    @Suck It Up!:
    Was one of the better graphic novels I’ve read in awhile. Glad to hear it’s been adapted well to the screen.

  81. 81.

    jl

    October 31, 2010 at 11:46 pm

    @MikeJ: I remember reading that Mick Jagger went to the London School of Economics for at least awhile and majored in political science or sociology, or social theory or some such thing. Not sure how long or whether he graduated. Tried to check in Wikipedia and didn’t find anything.

    I remember hearing an interview with him from awhile back when he was thinking about getting into politics. He sounded like a Arnold Schwarzenegger conservative, rather than a neanderthal Ted Nugent style conservative. But maybe his views have devolved since then.

    But, what about Richards. Or maybe his apolitical (except for taxation of millionaires).

  82. 82.

    Superluminar

    October 31, 2010 at 11:48 pm

    @DougJ
    Sadly, someone’salready done the Richards as Conservative article, if you really must read it.

  83. 83.

    MikeJ

    October 31, 2010 at 11:49 pm

    @jl: That would be my guess too, no real political philosophy except low taxes on rich people.

  84. 84.

    jl

    October 31, 2010 at 11:49 pm

    @Mark S.: thanks for that list. Brilliant music criticism, and literary analysis. Who woulda thunk that U2 and the Clash wrote conservative songs? But of course, Danny Elfman is a big fan of Sarah Palin, we all knew that.

    I hope he rights an update. Probably add something by Public Enemy to the list (Mabye Night of the Living Baseheads?)

  85. 85.

    Omnes Omnibus

    October 31, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    @jl: I can’t find the link right now, but I remember seeing articles from back when Jagger was knighted in which Richards was pissed off because he did not believe in the Honours system. The implication of the articles were that Richards was an unreconstructed Old Labour type.

  86. 86.

    jl

    October 31, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    @MikeJ: I don’t care particularly, just have gotten a bit curious to learn more since I heard about some unexpected quirks about some rockers. Richards a big Dickens fan, and other English literature too. And then I remember reading how Hendrix was in love with English Baroque music.

    I find it puzzling when people worry about artists’ political philosophy, and expect to find something coherent, or in line with their own arbitrary expectations. I don’t see why they should be expected to be deeper thinkers or have any interesting insight than anyone else.

  87. 87.

    WyldPirate

    October 31, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    @DougJ: Big deal, everyone likes to shag.

    This is an interesting double entendre in my neck of the woods–at least for me. However, most folks in my neck of the woods don’t get–or aren’t well-traveled enough–to know the meaning of the British use of “shag”. A lot of folks outside of the Southern US Coastal region under50 or so don’t know that shag refers to a type of swing dance, mostly to East Coast beach music.

    I knew and was around a small number of British exchange students for a number of yerars when i first moved to this area (NC) about 20 years ago. We got a new crop of them every summer. They thought the verb form of the dual meaning was hilarious.

    Good times and good people, those British kids. Loved to drink (sometimes to near dangerous excess) but were the most responsible kids in the world about not driving under the influence–they were doing the designated driver thing long before it was cool here. Funny, optimistic and full of life and worked their butts off, too. Much better prepared than academically than the American students as well.

  88. 88.

    jl

    October 31, 2010 at 11:56 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    “unreconstructed Old Labour type”

    Interesting. Richards can clearly hit a pub like one.

  89. 89.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    October 31, 2010 at 11:56 pm

    @Linda Featheringill:

    One thing that helps her is the fact that she doesn’t have the usual Repub face; she doesn’t have the thin cruel lips on a face that is creased by the lifelong wearing of a bitter frown, nor the usual nasty thin, cruel eyes that dart around looking for the closest liebrul or brown person to show disgust and disdain for.

    I can spot a conservative from the moment they walk into view. They wear their anger and hatred like a badge of honor.

    While Palin and O’Donnell are exceptions to this, the only reason why they side with the conservatives is that they are both gold diggers and attention whores. They are in this for the attention and money, that’s all. They are bought and paid for cheerleaders for the right. Their looks couldn’t get them anywhere (or anything) with smart people because they can see through their bullshit in a second.

    They’re just mean and stupid, that’s all.

  90. 90.

    kindness

    November 1, 2010 at 12:02 am

    Nice…the SF Giants are now 3 – 1….It’d be sweet to beat ’em in Dallas.

  91. 91.

    jl

    November 1, 2010 at 12:05 am

    @Superluminar: Thanks for that link to the hilarious Spectator column on how conservative Rock n Roll is.

    Richards was gung ho for war with Iraq in 2003. Therefore, he is conservative.

    And wuz I right about Public Enemy:

    “and it’s no use looking to black music for succour either; by and large hip hop and rap was the same blue-collar aggressiveness, misogyny, hedonism, homophobia and the glorification of ill-gotten wealth, with an added spurt of anti-white and anti-Semitic racism from those groups most adored by the liberal music press as being ‘radical’.”

    Chuck D is a Republican! Probably a Teabagger by now.

    Of course, it no news that a lot of rockers are conservative politically. How much of rock music has much of anything to do with politics? Not much.

  92. 92.

    morzer

    November 1, 2010 at 12:06 am

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/31/israel-coalition-government-walk-out

    Possible good news:

    Israel’s Labour party will walk out of the rightwing-dominated coalition government unless serious negotiations with the Palestinians get under way in the coming weeks, according to cabinet minister Avishay Braverman, an expected challenger to Ehud Barak for his party’s leadership.
    “We need to move as soon as possible. The only way to guarantee the state of the Jewish people is to move boldly after the US election,” Braverman, the minister for minorities, said in an interview. If Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu missed the opportunity, “Labor will not be in the coalition government. If there are the beginnings of serious negotiations, Labor stays; if not, Labor leaves.”

  93. 93.

    gbear

    November 1, 2010 at 12:07 am

    The Stones are so rich, so removed from real life and so used to unrestricted access to everything, they’ve got to be libertarian. To them, common people are ‘staff’. I doubt they’re concerned whether their tour t-shirts are made in sweatshops or not.

  94. 94.

    Mark S.

    November 1, 2010 at 12:07 am

    @Odie Hugh Manatee:

    Give Palin a few years. O’Donnell, on the other hand, doesn’t seem to be driven by the resentment as much. She seems more driven by the desire to not work for living. She may have hit the big time in that respect.

  95. 95.

    The Republic of Stupidity

    November 1, 2010 at 12:10 am

    @jl:

    And then I remember reading how Hendrix was in love with English Baroque music.

    Awwww geez… isn’t that pretty obvious from the intro of “Burning of the Midnight Lamp“?

  96. 96.

    DougJ

    November 1, 2010 at 12:10 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I think Mick votes soshulist.

  97. 97.

    Mark S.

    November 1, 2010 at 12:10 am

    @morzer:

    Hmm, that could be big.

  98. 98.

    morzer

    November 1, 2010 at 12:14 am

    @Mark S.:

    We can always hope. It’s certainly more promising than anything I can remember in the last couple of years.

  99. 99.

    Omnes Omnibus

    November 1, 2010 at 12:16 am

    @DougJ: I think so as well.

  100. 100.

    Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle

    November 1, 2010 at 12:17 am

    @jl: Don’t forget, despite his DFH leanings, Neil Young voted for Ray-gun(or at least voiced support for him. And yeah, he’s since admitted that it wasn’t the best idea even though he gave some reason why he kind of admired Ray-gun. Of course, NY has been very anti-Dubya from the beginning. You do know that NY’s fleet of vehicles(including some interesting classics .. and his tour bus) all run on biodiesel or cooking grease, right?

  101. 101.

    jl

    November 1, 2010 at 12:17 am

    @The Republic of Stupidity: No, not really. There were so many bands ripping off Baroque stuff for intros, some critics tried to create a genre of Baroque rock. Maybe everyone who wrote that stuff was seriously into Baroque like Hendrix, or maybe not. I don’t know.

  102. 102.

    Villago Delenda Est

    November 1, 2010 at 12:18 am

    Cyndi Lauper got it right with “Money Changes Everything”. The “conservatism” of the Stones has to do with preserving their pile.

  103. 103.

    Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle

    November 1, 2010 at 12:20 am

    @The Republic of Stupidity: Did you see that kid that was afraid of the camera, about half way through the video?

  104. 104.

    jl

    November 1, 2010 at 12:22 am

    From Richards’ Wikipedia entry:

    “It recently came to light that Richards yearns to be a librarian.”

    From the the reference:

    ” In his autobiography, Life, due to be published in October, Richards will reveal how, as a child growing up in the post-war-austerity of 1950s London, he found refuge in books before he discovered the blues.

    [Richards] has declared: “When you are growing up there are two institutional places that affect you most powerfully: the church, which belongs to God, and the public library, which belongs to you. The public library is a great equaliser.”

    Richards has signed up to the Little, Brown Book Group and will share writing duties with James Fox, the author of White Mischief, which charted aristocratic excess in pre-war Kenya. ”

    The Sunday Times April 4, 2010
    It’s only books ’n’ shelves but I like it

    http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article7086815.ece

    I guess I will end up looking at his biography. Sounds like some surprises in there.

  105. 105.

    gbear

    November 1, 2010 at 12:24 am

    @jl: Baroque rock.

    Pretty Ballerina by The Left Banke.

    The anti-Shaggs.

  106. 106.

    JWL

    November 1, 2010 at 12:25 am

    I’m definitely going to read it.

    In (say) 1970, the odds of KR living until 2010 would have been pegged at about 50,000 to one (conservatively speaking).

    The man’s got some stories to tell.

  107. 107.

    Omnes Omnibus

    November 1, 2010 at 12:28 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: John Mortimer of Rumpole fame did a series of interviews with British notables in the 1980s that were published in the book In Character. Jagger was one. Mortimer tried to pin Jagger down on his politics. Jagger ducked a lot of the questions. The closest he came to answering was when Mortimer asked if he would ever do a concert for a politician. Jagger said it had been suggested in the past. Mortimer asked it he would do one for Reagan. Answer: “‘Not Mr. Reagan. Naaow.’ The last word was a long-drawn-out murmur of incredulity and derision.” When asked about Thatcher in the same context the response was “Let’s say she wouldn’t ask.”

    FWIW

  108. 108.

    Omnes Omnibus

    November 1, 2010 at 12:31 am

    @Villago Delenda Est: That song is by the Brains.

  109. 109.

    Redshift

    November 1, 2010 at 12:34 am

    @Odie Hugh Manatee: Yeah, I know what you mean. A few weeks ago, we were at my wife’s college reunion, and out of nowhere (no one else was talking politics) this one guy who we barely knew declared that he was conservative and he’d been at the anti-mosque protest, and people said it was about hate, but the only people being hateful were the counter-protesters. Then he tagged along on the college radio station tour (even though he hadn’t worked on it when he was there) and told them that talk radio was really popular, and that’s what they ought to do if they wanted to get students to listen.

    And yet he seemed completely clueless when we did our best to avoid him the rest of the weekend…

  110. 110.

    Mark S.

    November 1, 2010 at 12:44 am

    Just noticed the update: What the fuck was that? Is whipping black women conservative? Is the author aware that the Stones had more than two songs? The Who were Tories? Punk was Thatcherite?

    I think that was the only article I’ve ever read where every single sentence was insane.

  111. 111.

    JWL

    November 1, 2010 at 12:58 am

    Richards was reportedly incensed when Jagger accepted his knighthood (or whatever it’s called when he became a “Sir”). He only cooled off when Charlie Watts told him to forget it, “that a lot of terrible people have been given the award”.

    Or so I read….

  112. 112.

    Origuy

    November 1, 2010 at 1:30 am

    @PeakVT:
    In the 60s, there was a comedy show called Rowan and Martin’s Laugh In. They had a lot of celebrities appearing briefly to say “Sock it to me.” During the 1968 election, one of them was Richard Nixon.

  113. 113.

    Amir_Khalid

    November 1, 2010 at 2:00 am

    I was asking about Keef’s book in an open thread the other day. Now I’m definitely going to get it.

    As for rockers’ politics, it sounds absolutely nuts to assign Brown Sugar or Won’t Get Fooled Again or Taxman — or any song, really — a place on the ideological spectrum. A body of work like Springsteen’s might; but look at Youngstown, where he sings of “the tanks and bombs that won this country’s wars”. Does that make him, or the song, rightwing?

    Rockers are all over the political, ideological and spiritual spectrums, just like everybody else. Rod Liddle is a notoriously reactionary git, and I wouldn’t take him seriously at all.

  114. 114.

    Cheryl from Maryland

    November 1, 2010 at 7:14 am

    Mr. Richards impresses with his wide knowledge of music and his deep understanding of his art. The rest is window dressing.

  115. 115.

    grumpy realist

    November 1, 2010 at 7:36 am

    Talking about the MSM Not Getting It, there’s a long extended whine in the NYTimes this morning about the Stewart/Colbert rally and how irrelevant it is because “nobody knows who Stewart is.” (I also note that they’re not allowing comments on the article.)

    God, they are so clueless….

  116. 116.

    bjacques

    November 1, 2010 at 7:50 am

    @91 jl: I gotta speak up for Chuck D. He is definitely *not* a Teabagger, or even a firebagger. And he’s still very busy.

    And Sturgeon’s Law applies to rap as it does to just about everything else.

  117. 117.

    jinxtigr

    November 1, 2010 at 10:34 am

    Heh. Springsteen was sort of vaguely libertarian rock and roll transcendence up to Born In The USA, which got hijacked by rightwingers. He tried to avoid taking a position for a while, but called the Reagan Revolution ‘terrifying’ on stage, and as he got leaned on more heavily by rightwingers, took to endorsing union food banks and veteran organizations, which he was very good at. His organization would gather and direct a great deal of attention and support, and onstage he would hammer home the point (even to writing songs) that it wasn’t really a good economy with families starving and out of work- and this is in the 1980s.

    Ahead of the curve. I guess now it’s becoming more obvious to everybody.

    Roger Waters said an interesting thing in a Classic Albums video once- he said everyone’s all socia1ist and stuff until they make a few million dollars, and once you have done that you must understand that that money WILL BE INVESTED no matter what you do with it- and you become a capitalist to try and direct what will happen to it.

    Very intelligent point I thought.

  118. 118.

    Nellcote

    November 1, 2010 at 11:46 am

    circa 2005:

    SWEET NEO CON
    (M. Jagger/K. Richards)

    You call yourself a Christian
    I think that you’re a hypocrite
    You say you are a patriot
    I think that you’re a crock of shit

    And listen, I love gasoline
    I drink it every day
    But it’s getting very pricey
    And who is going to pay

    How come you’re so wrong
    My sweet neo con…. Yeah

    It’s liberty for all
    ‘Cause democracy’s our style
    Unless you are against us
    Then it’s prison without trial

    But one thing that is certain
    Life is good at Haliburton
    If you’re really so astute
    You should invest at Brown & Root…. Yeah

    How come you’re so wrong
    My sweet neo con
    If you turn out right
    I’ll eat my hat tonight

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah….

    It’s getting very scary
    Yes, I’m frightened out of my wits
    There’s bombers in my bedroom
    Yeah and it’s giving me the shits

    We must have loads more bases
    To protect us from our foes
    Who needs these foolish friendships
    We’re going it alone

    How come you’re so wrong
    My sweet neo con
    Where’s the money gone
    In the Pentagon

    Yeah ha ha ha
    Yeah, well, well

  119. 119.

    jl

    November 1, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    @bjacques:

    “He is definitely not a Teabagger, or even a firebagger. And he’s still very busy.”

    I know. I was making a joke.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Joey Maloney on Late Night Open Thread: All Mah Gapes Gone! (Jan 28, 2023 @ 5:36am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Friday Evening Open Thread: Kevin McCarthy’s Select(ive) Committee(s) (Jan 28, 2023 @ 5:34am)
  • Aussie Sheila on Late Night Open Thread: All Mah Gapes Gone! (Jan 28, 2023 @ 5:33am)
  • Traveller on War for Ukraine Day 337: International Holocaust Remembrance Day Amidst Another Genocidal War in Europe (Jan 28, 2023 @ 4:51am)
  • livewyre on War for Ukraine Day 337: International Holocaust Remembrance Day Amidst Another Genocidal War in Europe (Jan 28, 2023 @ 4:35am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!