• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

And we’re all out of bubblegum.

People are complicated. Love is not.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Balloon Juice has never been a refuge for the linguistically delicate.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Hot air and ill-informed banter

Come on, man.

if you can’t see it, then you are useless in the fight to stop it.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

Fuck the extremist election deniers. What’s money for if not for keeping them out of office?

The poor and middle-class pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the wealthy pay politicians.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Schmidt just says fuck it, opens a tea shop.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

A snarling mass of vitriolic jackals

My years-long effort to drive family and friends away has really paid off this year.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

We cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Glibertarianism / Gastritis Broke My Calculator

Gastritis Broke My Calculator

by John Cole|  December 23, 20102:08 pm| 252 Comments

This post is in: Glibertarianism, Technically True but Collectively Nonsense

FacebookTweetEmail

It’s too early for DougJ to start drinking, even though he is Irish and on vacation, so I will note that McMegan has thrown up a “correction” of sorts:

Yup, Brad DeLong is right: I probably made a math error eight years ago, and didn’t see it when it was initially pointed out to me by commenter Doug J. How large the error is depends on whether you take nominal or real GDP, compare it to nominal or real spending on the Iraq war, and so forth, but I’d say at a minimum I was off by a factor of at least three, though not “an order of magnitude”, since it seems clear to me that nominal-to-nominal, not real-to-real, is the correct comparison.

I can’t explain the math error, since it was, as I believe I mentioned, eight years ago. I can probably explain why I didn’t see it, which is that I was laid flat with gastritis and working on about 3 hours sleep and 300 calories a day of rice and mashed potatoes. As anyone who has had gastritis can attest, this does leave you a little fuzzy. Or perhaps I was just being stupid.

I struggle daily to live up to Brad’s well-known standards of accuracy, fairness, and integrity; I’m sorry that I clearly failed in this instance.

This is so quintessentially McMegan and representative of the way our elites function that it is actually a thing of beauty. Researchers in the future will want to examine this when looking back on the decline of the empire. Point by point:

1. “I probably made a math error…” – Actually, you quite clearly made a math error.

2. “and didn’t see it when it was initially pointed out to me by commenter Doug J”– Or the other half dozen times in the thread he attempted to explain it and re-explain it.

3. “How large the error is depends on whether you…”– Back to making excuses already.

4. “I can’t explain the math error, since it was, as I believe I mentioned, eight years ago.”– Actually, what drove DougJ to drink was that you couldn’t see the math error as recently as a few hours ago, despite repeatedly having it pointed out to you in excruciating detail.

5. “I can probably explain why I didn’t see it, which is that I was laid flat with gastritis…”– Gastritis broke MAH CALCULATOR!

6. “and working on about 3 hours sleep and 300 calories a day of rice and mashed potatoes.”– Really, you all should feel terrible for picking on me when I feel like this. Jerks! Pity party pity party!

7. “Or perhaps I was just being stupid.”– Perhaps.

8. “I struggle daily to live up to Brad’s well-known standards of accuracy, fairness, and integrity..”– And let’s finish this “correction” with a snide insult directed at the people who had the temerity to point out I was wrong.

***

And there you have it- McMegan, in all her glory. The only thing missing is the customary “I’m sorry if you were offended by that” that is so popular these days.

Why couldn’t she just write- “Pretty clearly I was wrong about what the cost of the Gulf War was going to be and made some calculation errors based on my inaccurate projections. I don’t know what I was thinking back then, but right now I’m feeling a little under the weather and not thinking clearly. Thanks to those of you who pointed this out and were right.”

That’s what I would have written. Although, in fairness, I have had a lot of practice being wrong.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Happy Festivus
Next Post: Open Thread »

Reader Interactions

252Comments

  1. 1.

    valdivia

    December 23, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    this is the funniest title. though not a song reference it still fantastic. I really hope DougJ is drinking!

    and you John get triple points for annotating her ‘apology’

  2. 2.

    sukabi

    December 23, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    Gastritis = full of shit.

    And that explains it all.

  3. 3.

    Comrade Mary

    December 23, 2010 at 2:13 pm

    Gastritis broke MAH CALCULATOR!

    New rotating tagline, please!

  4. 4.

    The Grand Panjandrum

    December 23, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    … you all should feel terrible for picking on me when I feel like this. Jerks!

    I live for the moments when I can crush the delicate feelings of our mighty blog overseer. At least you have cute feet.

  5. 5.

    Tim

    December 23, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    Come on John: You would have written, “Fuck you, douche.” :D

    Regarding McAddled, does anyone have the scoop on how much the Atlantic pays the moron? I can’t find anything on Google. Would love to know.

    I mean, I am retarded at math and I could write the dodgey bullshit she spews.

  6. 6.

    spudvol

    December 23, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Cole would have written the following- “Fuck you, I’m going on vacation!” Then posted something 5 minutes later.

  7. 7.

    Dave C

    December 23, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    @Comrade Mary:

    This!

    Also too, Cole your ability to admit your mistakes without turning into a passive-aggressive, petulant child is one of the (several) reasons I love this blog.

  8. 8.

    steviez314

    December 23, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    The dog ate her decimal point.

    That’s why she was off by, say it with me…..”an order of Megantude.”

  9. 9.

    Comrade Javamanphil

    December 23, 2010 at 2:18 pm

    Why Atlantic’s Business and Economics Editor, what thin skin you have!

  10. 10.

    4tehlulz

    December 23, 2010 at 2:18 pm

    My dog ate my Gulf War.

  11. 11.

    hildebrand

    December 23, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    OT – Sorry, still chortling over the sidebar add for D’Souza’s latest book. I imagine that Obama has raged at some point in his adult life, but my goodness, the man barely achieves ‘getting his dander up’ or perhaps he might even get to ‘concerned’ or ‘snide’ or ‘exercised’. Rage? Not so much, unless someone actually threatened his girls – even then I think it would be more like ‘Exterminate!’ (think Daleks).

  12. 12.

    Comrade Javamanphil

    December 23, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    Oh, and comments 1-8 are all seconded by me.

  13. 13.

    Zifnab

    December 23, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    That’s what I would have written.

    And that’s why you’re never going to make it at the Atlantic.

  14. 14.

    Keith G

    December 23, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    That’s what I would have written.

    Admitting mistakes – How very West Virginian.

  15. 15.

    Sister Machine Gun of Quiet Harmony

    December 23, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    She has a lot of practice being wrong, too. She just doesn’t have a lot of experience admitting it.

  16. 16.

    Zifnab

    December 23, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    @Tim:

    Come on John: You would have written, “Fuck you, douche.” :D

    Um… no, he wouldn’t have.
    Even at the height of Bush-o-philia, John was capable of a genuine mea culpa. That’s why I’m trolling his blog and not still throwing pies at Dan Riehl.

  17. 17.

    MTiffany

    December 23, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    It’s too early for DougJ to start drinking,

    The upside of the global economy is that it’s always 1pm somewhere in the world.

    +2

  18. 18.

    South of I-10

    December 23, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    @Comrade Mary: Totally agree!

    I had no idea gastritis would throw your calculator off by a decimal point. Live and learn.

  19. 19.

    Elvis Elvisberg

    December 23, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    I think this astute commenter over at her place made the same point quite well.

    Incidentally, her next post is pretty good. Yes, it’s finding fault with Krugman, but in a measured, reasonable way.

  20. 20.

    daveNYC

    December 23, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    New rotating tagline, please!

    Thirded, or fourthed, or whatever it is at this point.

  21. 21.

    MikeJ

    December 23, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    I like the fact that she can’t explain why she made the error because it was eight years ago, and who remembers trivial shit that happened 8 years ago? Then she turns around and remembers that she didn’t get much sleep, and that was the week her dog got herpes, and mercury was retrograde, but who could possibly remember the logical underpinnings of an argument to go blow up a million people?

  22. 22.

    WarMunchkin

    December 23, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    I wish I had the wit to write a snarky or insightful comment. Instead I’ll just say that this is a really good post and made me happy.

  23. 23.

    MTiffany

    December 23, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    How large the error is depends on whether you take nominal or real GDP, compare it to nominal or real spending on the Iraq war, and so forth,

    “Nominal or real?” Wow, she’s even admitting that there is a reality. Someone’s got a New Year’s Resolution…

  24. 24.

    Turgidson

    December 23, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    @Sister Machine Gun of Quiet Harmony:

    Or, the vast majority of the time, realizing and understanding it. No matter how meticulously it’s explained to her. The fact that she (sort of) admitted a mistake here is hopefully a breakthrough. I’m not holding my breath on that one though.

  25. 25.

    Loneoak

    December 23, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    In other IOKIYAR news, GOP big-wigs are hanging out with Iranian terruhists in clear violation of their own stupid interpretation of federal law.

    What’s really weird about this is Tancredo, Giuliani, Ridge and Mukasey palling around with Marxist-Islamic-Feminist terruhists. “Enemy of my enemy” and all that, but yeesh.

  26. 26.

    Lesley

    December 23, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    Is gastritis responsible for her resisting admitting the error until she had no choice?

  27. 27.

    John Cole

    December 23, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    @Elvis Elvisberg: “The only logical explanation here is that David Bradley views McArdle & Fallows as the Atlantic’s ripoff of Goofus & Gallant. ”

    LMAO.

  28. 28.

    Rob

    December 23, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    If only the truth of this could be checked somehow, I’d be willing to bet $1 million that she was not “living on 300 calories a day”, of rice and taters or anything else. My bullshit detector just clanged so loud the neighbors are complaining.

  29. 29.

    Comrade Javamanphil

    December 23, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    @Lesley: No but it is responsible for her deciding to do it on the afternoon before a holiday weekend when almost nobody would be reading her stupid blog.

  30. 30.

    joe from Lowell

    December 23, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    The important part isn’t the math error, but the conclusion she drew from the math error. Because of the incorrect cost she came up with, she drew a certain conclusion about the Iraq War, and about the argument of those who opposed it warned about that cost.

    She should really write something about that, because this isn’t ultimately about math.

  31. 31.

    Carl Nyberg

    December 23, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    The lack of sleep claim reminds me of people I’ve known who tell you how hard they are working.

    Many of them aren’t accomplishing much that’s productive, but they are very busy and have lots of attitude.

  32. 32.

    quaint irene

    December 23, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    Just a more extended way of saying, ‘Well, excuuuuuuse meeeeeee!’

  33. 33.

    TooManyJens

    December 23, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    That’s what I would have written.

    Well, that and calling yourself a dumbass.

  34. 34.

    Chyron HR

    December 23, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    300 calories a day of rice and mashed potatoes

    Well, that’s why normal people don’t run out and spend all their food stamps on swordfish steak and European cheese to prove a “point”.

  35. 35.

    Lesley

    December 23, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    Not to rub pink Himalyan salt in the wound, but

    Gastritis, an inflammation of the lining of the stomach, has many possible causes.[1] The main acute causes are excessive alcohol consumption or prolonged use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (also known as NSAIDs) such as aspirin or ibuprofen. Sometimes gastritis develops after major surgery, traumatic injury, burns, or severe infections. Gastritis may also occur in those who have had weight loss surgery resulting in the banding or reconstruction of the digestive tract. Chronic causes are infection with bacteria, primarily Helicobacter pylori, chronic bile reflux, stress and certain autoimmune disorders can cause gastritis as well.

    I’m putting my money on bile as the cause.

  36. 36.

    Douglas

    December 23, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    That’s what I would have written. Although, in fairness, I have had a lot of practice being wrong.

    While McMegan has so muchy practice being wrong that her experience overflowed and turned into the negative.

  37. 37.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    Nooooooooooooooooooooooobody could have foreseen a math error hitting the talking points.

  38. 38.

    balconesfault

    December 23, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    Just in case you didn’t get the point that you’re all a bunch of weenies for challenging her math, she decides she needs to emphasize that in the comments:

    How about I can’t reproduce what I did in a throwaway line eight years out, so I don’t know whether there was a math error, or whether I used some assumptions that I would now not use–or even whether I used some assumptions that I would now use, if my 8-years-ago self could argue with me today. Probably a math error, but I don’t know.

    If you strenuously search everything I write for the worst possible talmudic interpretation, you will certainly find any number of terrible things. This is, of course, equally true of DougJ or Brad DeLong, or anyone else.

  39. 39.

    Tim

    December 23, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    @Zifnab:

    Um… no, he wouldn’t have.
    Even at the height of Bush-o-philia, John was capable of a genuine mea culpa. That’s why I’m trolling his blog and not still throwing pies at Dan Riehl.

    See? THIS is the kind of Cole brown-tonguing it is my solemn duty to counter. ;D

  40. 40.

    Tim

    December 23, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    @balconesfault:

    How about I can’t reproduce what I did in a throwaway line eight years out, so I don’t know whether there was a math error, or whether I used some assumptions that I would now not use—or even whether I used some assumptions that I would now use, if my 8-years-ago self could argue with me today. Probably a math error, but I don’t know.
    If you strenuously search everything I write for the worst possible talmudic interpretation, you will certainly find any number of terrible things. This is, of course, equally true of DougJ or Brad DeLong, or anyone else.

    It really is bizarre how she almost always chooses to keep digging herself deeper in comments…what a petulant weiner.

  41. 41.

    TooManyJens

    December 23, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    @balconesfault: “It’s your fault for noticing that I screwed up!”

  42. 42.

    General Stuck

    December 23, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    Math criminals should get pardons, on general principle. Perennial Stupidity is an intellectual disability, that is a natural plus for those seeking careers in political punditry. Meghan has no peer, in this regard, while standing out in her field of dreams.

    This blog post could not have occurred without her talent and hard work.

  43. 43.

    The Real American Democrat

    December 23, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    While Operation Iraqi Freedom unfolded differently than the architects had prepared for, it still unfolded and the current conditions are much better than what could have happened had Saddam Hussein been allowed to continue another decade of human rights violations, WMD development, and terrorist support. Good for America. They rid the world of an ugly dictator and ushered in true democracy in the cradle of civilization. That’s something that you’ll never hear “progressives” saying that they got wrong. I, for one, continue to support our troops.

  44. 44.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    December 23, 2010 at 2:42 pm

     

    Gastritis broke MAH CALCULATOR!

    Well to be fair, this does tend to happen quite a lot when you try to run a modern enterprise using Thunderdome pigshit as your primary energy source.

  45. 45.

    c u n d gulag

    December 23, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    Ah kant rite nor figger wid dem nummers none neither.
    Kan I haz a paying gig at Dee Atlantick, two?

  46. 46.

    ChrisS

    December 23, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    I mean it’s not like she seriously advocates a position. It’s a feckin’ blog fer crissakes. C’mon, cut her some slack, she’s telling things like they are. No one is supposed to take seriously. Like Ann Coulter, she’s just political entertainment.

  47. 47.

    Norwonk

    December 23, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    I probably made a math error eight years ago…

    I’m no mathematician, but I think the probability is 100% in this case. Not that I would expect McMegan to be able to calculate that correctly.

  48. 48.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    December 23, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    “I could have written something that wasn’t wrong, but I didn’t have the stomach for it”.

    I know how you feel Megan. I kind of feel the same way about reading your columns.

  49. 49.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    December 23, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    “I could have written something that wasn’t wrong, but I didn’t have the stomach for it”.

    I know how you feel Megan. I kind of feel the same way about reading your columns.

  50. 50.

    erlking

    December 23, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Does Suderman blow Sullivan to keep Eloise at the Atlantic? It’s irresponsible not to speculate… ’cause that is some grade A bullshit Megs is dishing out.

  51. 51.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    @joe from Lowell:

    The important part isn’t the math error, but the conclusion she drew from the math error. Because of the incorrect cost she came up with, she drew a certain conclusion about the Iraq War, and about the argument of those who opposed it warned about that cost.
    She should really write something about that, because this isn’t ultimately about math.

    I think you are describing McMegan’s thought processes about this backwards. It more likely went like this: economists she dislikes (she didn’t just insult Galbraith but his father as well) pointed out accurately the near certainty of an immensely expensive occupation of Iraq. She reflexively had to disagree in the classic contrarian glibertard way (if a proponent of a larger government role in the economy states p i must immediately assert not p) and her missing the math error which should have been obvious once she typed it was because she simply couldn’t believe that Galbraith could indeed be right (and, oh, he was right as rain).

    This is really no different from any other glibertard including Kain. Start from the conclusion reached from what you believe to be an unshakable reality and ignore all contrary evidence.

    A random bit of whining. Yesterday my corner beer store guy noted that my ID expired last month on my birthday. Not sure how I missed that besides never having to look at my ID. I don’t remember getting a piece of mail So today I packed up my birth certificate, a tax assessor notice, and my Social Security card to get it replaced. Turns out that the state offices are closed today. No big deal. I stopped for lunch on the way home and while I was in the restroom my bag containing only those items and wet used gym clothes was lifted off the back of my chair. Ughh

    And, yeah, I have no idea how to go about getting a birth certificate with an expired ID and no idea how to get a SS card without a birth certificate etc. I basically have to hope I have an understanding clerk at the Secretary of State’s office on Monday. Along these lines is it illegal to have your own SS card and birth certificate forged? Kidding. Well, sort of ….

    Ailuridae +0 but with a Pliny the Elder cooling down for a 2PM CST opening.

  52. 52.

    Cat Lady

    December 23, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    She forgot to mention one of her initial excuses where somehow her error of magnitude eight years ago was because Cole was egging her on, or something. Her flailing and flopping and spinning is making me dizzy.

  53. 53.

    dmsilev

    December 23, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    She really needs to buy a new calculator. If memory serves, she tried to excuse some other asinine math mistake by claiming that her calculator didn’t have enough digits or some such.

    I’d recommend an HP-12C; watching her try to understand Reverse Polish Notation would be good for hours of entertainment…

    dms

  54. 54.

    El Cid

    December 23, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    So, since I’ve only briefly read over this, how would nominal-to-nominal or real-to-real change the ratio between the cost of the Iraq war — postulated at ‘several trillion — if the same adjusted value of the war is made for the different GDP measures?

    Where currently the math is that ‘several trillion’ would be about 1% of the sum total of GDP over the specified time period.

    How do the two different reference values change this ration to 0.1%?

  55. 55.

    balconesfault

    December 23, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    @The Real American Democrat:

    While Operation Iraqi Freedom unfolded differently than the architects had prepared for, it still unfolded and the current conditions are much better than what could have happened had Saddam Hussein been allowed to continue another decade of human rights violations, WMD development, and terrorist support.

    Yeah, tell that to the Iraqis whose families were ripped apart by the violence we unleashed, and whose homes and neighborhoods and lifestyles were permanently destroyed thanks to our decisions.

    A couple trillion US dollars down the hole? And I thought it was the right wing that insisted on cost-benefit analysis for every government action.

  56. 56.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    Mistakes may have been made, and I may have made one of them.

  57. 57.

    cleek

    December 23, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    Q: why would an on-line magazine employ a blogger?
    A: because he/she brings hits.

    ignore her and the Invisible Hand will shoo her away!

  58. 58.

    handy

    December 23, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    @The Real American Democrat:

    John, are sure it’s too early for DougJ to have started drinking?

  59. 59.

    p.a.

    December 23, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @Keith G:

    Admitting mistakes – How very West Virginian.

    or how very 19th century. maybe early 20th…

    also, is she saying she has gastritis now as an excuse for her obtusitude obtuseness? or does she remember an attack from 8 years ago as an excuse for the original first-month-of-long-division type of mistake?

  60. 60.

    El Cid

    December 23, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    @balconesfault:

    And I thought it was the right wing that insisted on cost-benefit analysis for every government action.

    Not for any war, and not for any program they actually want.

  61. 61.

    WereBear

    December 23, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    @Ailuridae: That sucks AND blows. Might be worth checking dumpsters in the area; unless those docs are worth money.

  62. 62.

    tomvox1

    December 23, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    @Elvis Elvisberg:

    He also, like everyone else, can be wrong…but when I make a mistake it’s cause I’m sick and when he does, it’s cause he’s librul

    Fixed.

  63. 63.

    BoredNow

    December 23, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Is it just me or did anyone else hear Cartman when reading that.

  64. 64.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    btw, did any of the usual libertarian suspects have anything positive to say about the repeal of DADT?

    Or do they not even bother to pretend to be libertarians anymore?

  65. 65.

    change

    December 23, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    I hope Obambi enjoys expensive Hawaii vacation, because it’s only two weeks until the GOP takes the Speaker’s gavel.

    We can prevent the government takeover of healthcare and Wall St. by simply refusing to pass a budget that has funds for either.

    What will Obambi say to that?

    And just wait until the debt limit vote…

  66. 66.

    BoredNow

    December 23, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    – Gastritis broke MAH CALCULATOR!”

    Is it just me or did anyone else hear Cartman when reading that.

  67. 67.

    a1

    December 23, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    Although, in fairness, I have had a lot of practice being wrong.

    What’s McArdle’s excuse then? She should have a black belt in Wrongness with all the practice she’s put in. Her problem isn’t being wrong, but having no inclination whatsoever in finding out what’s right – another idolator at the Altar of Truthiness.

  68. 68.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    December 23, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    @spudvol:

    Cole would have written the following- “Fuck you, I’m going on vacation!”.

    Or “Not tonight, I have an ulcer”.

    Followed by two dozen posts. About spicy food. That he was cooking for dinner.

  69. 69.

    Bill E Pilgrim

    December 23, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    @spudvol:

    Cole would have written the following- “Fuck you, I’m going on vacation!”.

    Or “Not tonight, I have an ulcer”.

    Followed by two dozen posts. About spicy food. That he was cooking for dinner.

  70. 70.

    The Bobs

    December 23, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    “I probably made a math error…”

    err, in other words, I’m too stupid to know if I made a math error. Besides, math is so indefinite and all that.

  71. 71.

    Turgidson

    December 23, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    @The Real American Democrat:

    Cool story, brah.

  72. 72.

    JoshA

    December 23, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    I was watching some of the segments from Maddow’s show online, and noted how she would cheerfully admit how wrong she had been on some issues lately.

    She started off joking that she “couldn’t be trusted on food safety” and then painstakingly detailed the 5 changes to the status of the food safety bill that’s happened and her erroneous reporting (“I said it was done when it wasn’t, then I said it probably would get done when it wouldn’t, then I said it was dead when it was alive” etc).

    She also described herself as “wrong, wrong, gloriously wrong” for asserting that DADT repeal could not be passed during the lame duck session.

    I’m sure there are progressives who can’t admit error, and I’m sure there are conservatives who can admit error. But as a whole, progressives view life as a learning experience, where new facts cause your viewpoint to change. Conservatives want the facts should conform to their viewpoint. If the facts fail to follow orders, they try to make them conform, and if they can’t, then they scream in frustration and blast those who made them admit a mistake.

  73. 73.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    mistakes were made, but they were all part of God’s plan.

    God was testing me, the same way he tested Job and Jesus.

  74. 74.

    change

    December 23, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    On March 4th, the government shutdown begins…

  75. 75.

    thomas Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    I just want to say thanks to all here; I’m having a genuinely sucky day (happy Festivus, all!) and this thread is bringing a smile to my lips and joy to my heart.

    Also, too: the headline must become a tagline.

  76. 76.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    December 23, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    @Sister Machine Gun of Quiet Harmony:

    She has a lot of practice being wrong, too. She just doesn’t have a lot of any experience admitting it

    Fixited.

  77. 77.

    Rob

    December 23, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    Cleek – I often wonder the same thing about Ann Althouse – i.e., if liberals didn’t spend so much time mocking her, would anyone care what she wrote?

  78. 78.

    pragmatism

    December 23, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    change, i hope the amount you get paid per each post gets increased for Holiday. FSM willing. the work is too important.

  79. 79.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    @JoshA:

    I was watching some of the segments from Maddow’s show online, and noted how she would cheerfully admit how wrong she had been on some issues lately.

    How refreshing.

    I was watching Lawerence O’Donnell last night and he had a bunch of butt hurt bloggers who refused to admit any misjudgment.

  80. 80.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    @change: don’t you have any respect for Jesus? How dare you disrespect Christians and Christianity by posting so close to the Lord’s birthday!

  81. 81.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    December 23, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    @cleek:

    ignore her and the Invisible Hand will shoo her away!

    This, a thousand times this.

    I no longer read WaPo political pieces for this very reason. The fewer hits the Bacon Bits, Murrays, Kornbluts and Milbanks of the Chattering Class get, the sooner they’ll go away.

    I guess we’re all libertarians now. I need a long hot shower.

  82. 82.

    p.a.

    December 23, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    “I probably made a math error…”

    Could be America’s epitaph post the 2000 Preznit election.

  83. 83.

    srv

    December 23, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    Well now that that’s settled, perhaps McMegan can figure out how much she got the cost to the Iraqi people wrong.

  84. 84.

    catclub

    December 23, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    @Comrade Javamanphil: Some people have the sense to NEVER read her blog.

  85. 85.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    December 23, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    @Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century):

    God was testing me, the same way he tested Job and Jesus.

    And Larry Gopnik.

  86. 86.

    jcricket

    December 23, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    A dingo probably ate McMegan’s brain a while back too.

  87. 87.

    balconesfault

    December 23, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    @change:

    We can prevent the government takeover of healthcare and Wall St. by simply refusing to pass a budget that has funds for either.

    “We” … is Boehner commenting here now?

  88. 88.

    srv

    December 23, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    @Ailuridae: Birth certificates you can order online from your Secretary of State office.

  89. 89.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    @thomas Levenson: Cheer up; I bought your Newton book as one my dad’s Christmas presents, so you should have a monster royalty check coming courtesy of me.

  90. 90.

    Chris

    December 23, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    @Ailuridae: Anyone can get your (or anyone’s) birth certificate. Simply write to the state (or DC) in which you were born, saying that you need an official copy of “your” birth certificate (there’s a form I used for the one from my birthplace, I imagine it is the same for all others) to be mailed to [address] etc.

    You then use your (or anyone else’s) B.C. to get some other official ID, and voila, you are yourself (or anyone else you wish to be).

    At some point, some states started correlating birth records with death records, and it became somewhat more difficult to steal the ID of someone who died young (but otherwise would have been your own age) if you need to “disappear”. But it’s still possible.

  91. 91.

    change

    December 23, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    Obambi is powerless to stop the GOP, either he will sign our budget into law or we’ll shutdown the government–and it will be for months this time, not just a few weeks.

    And John Boehner is no Bob Dole/..he won’t cave.

  92. 92.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    @JoshA:

    Conservatives want the facts should conform to their viewpoint. If the facts fail to follow orders, they try to make them conform, and if they can’t, then they scream in frustration and blast those who made them admit a mistake.

    This true of a lot lefty bloggers who yesterday denigrated the DADT repeal as “small potatoes”, “a crumb”, and “a bone”. Instead of admitting they were wrong about shutting down the lame duck session or calling for a short term executive order, they tried to marginalize a historic achievement to get off the hook.

  93. 93.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    Not everyone got deep into the weeds on DougJ’s relevant post so I’ll just repeat this once:

    I’ve no problem volunteering that I have really shit aptitude for (higher) math, but this is ridiculous. Megan gives new meaning to the acronym YMMV aka Your Mileage May Vary. But hey, what do I know? I’ve never walked 528 feet in her shoes.

  94. 94.

    Another Bob

    December 23, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    You might think, naively, that McArdle’s job was to be honest and accurate and inform her readers. But her actual job, as with so many other “libertarian”/conservative pundits, is to lie and disseminate propaganda for the oligarchs. If she weren’t serving their interests, she wouldn’t have this plum job of hers. She’d probably have to make her money through real estate swindles or pyramid schemes or something.

  95. 95.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    @freelancer: Shouldn’t that be 52,800 feet?

  96. 96.

    balconesfault

    December 23, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    @Another Bob:

    But her actual job, as with so many other “libertarian”/conservative pundits, is to lie and disseminate propaganda for the oligarchs. If she weren’t serving their interests, she wouldn’t have this plum job of hers.

    Yeah – that’s why the “starve her from hits” strategy won’t work. It’s too valuable to have a McArdle and other pundits proving stuff, so that others can refer back to them for documentation of the “truth”.

  97. 97.

    JoshA

    December 23, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    @Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century): Ah, the Firebagger faction? Too bad. I really thought that getting DADT repeal done might make them question their belief that Obama is “America’s most homophobic President” or some such. I suppose they know what they know, and Obama shouldn’t think he can confuse them with facts.

  98. 98.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    @srv:

    But how would I prove I am me? So do I just call the Secretary of State in my home state (Upstate NY represent!) and tell them I am me? I imagine they could send it to my address certified mail and then they would know I am not doing any complicated identity theft business. But then I show up to the post office and have to show valid ID, right?

    @WereBear:

    I just talked to two beat cops about this. I wasn’t nearly as worried about it as I should have been (since those forms were all it would take for me to get a new ID, anyone with them could do the same etc). They’re pretty sure that the secretary of state’s office here (Chicago) would be understanding as I have an expired ID that is plainly me, I am the only person with my combination of first and last name in the world etc…

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I gave out the newton book to a half dozen people. It really is quite excellent.

    Ailuridae + exactly one glorious sip of Pliny the Elder which I am starting to believe the hype about (America’s best beer, etc)

  99. 99.

    Malraux

    December 23, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    How large the error is depends on whether you take nominal or real GDP, compare it to nominal or real spending on the Iraq war, and so forth, but I’d say at a minimum I was off by a factor of at least three, though not “an order of magnitude”, since it seems clear to me that nominal-to-nominal, not real-to-real, is the correct comparison

    Oh this pisses me off. So the $324T or whatever the number was from the other thread was in nominal dollars. But if you do it in real dollars, it becomes a much smaller number because there’s no inflation across that time period. So by trying to make excuses, she’s showing that she knows fuckall about math and making her case worse.

    How the fuck does she have a reasonable paying job dealing with math?

  100. 100.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    December 23, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    @The Real American Democrat: Don’t confuse the issues. “Supporting the troops” != “Iraq was the right thing.”

  101. 101.

    Ann B. Nonymous

    December 23, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    @change:

    Obambi is powerless to stop the GOP, either he will sign our budget into law or we’ll shutdown the government—and it will be for months this time, not just a few weeks.

    Oh, you beautiful man, I hope you do shut down the government for months. I’ve wanted to see Republicans hunted down with dogs in the street for years.

    It’s a little wasteful of the meat, of course. There are deserving immigrants who could benefit from those organs. Still, what better way to trim the fat from American society.

  102. 102.

    PPOG Penguin

    December 23, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: That depends on whether you take nominal or real feet.

  103. 103.

    IM

    December 23, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    Now that was a grudging concession.

  104. 104.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    @change:

    That government shutdown worked so well for y’all last time.

  105. 105.

    Chyron HR

    December 23, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    @change:

    On March 4th, the Tea Party will become as popular as Newt Gingrich…

    Oh no! Not 2000 2004 2008 2012 Presidential frontrunner Newt Gingrich!!

  106. 106.

    TooManyJens

    December 23, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    Remind me again how we’re supposed to distinguish “Republicans governing” from “Republicans shutting down the government”?

  107. 107.

    catclub

    December 23, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    @Malraux:
    Remember the S Harris cartoon in Physics Today where there is a huge amount of writing on a chalkboard and then an arrow to the result with ‘then a miracle occurs’.

    Same thing here.

  108. 108.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    @PPOG Penguin:

    Either way, they’re just hypotheticals.

  109. 109.

    the fenian

    December 23, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    I’m thinking more highly of gastritis than I used to.

  110. 110.

    gbear

    December 23, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    That’s what I would have written.

    Yea, but you would have also pointed out that Brad DeLong’s glasses were kind of goofy.

  111. 111.

    Southern Beale

    December 23, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    She can’t explain the math error because it was eight years ago, but she CAN remember that she was laid flat with gastritis, working on about 3 hours sleep and malnourished from consuming just 300 calories a day of rice and mashed potatoes??

    Okie dokie.

    Then again, maybe (as she suggests) she was just being stupid.

    I caught my own not nearly so spectacular pundit FAIL yesterday, in the two seconds I was watching Morning Joe.

    This is exactly why I hate our punditry. I’m really just a Tennessee housewife, admittedly one who reads an awful lot, but still: I should be able to watch a full 10 minutes of a morning news & opinion program before catching the elite guests in a colossal error. Yet it never fails, in the first 60 seconds someone says something stupid and I’m throwing the remote at the TV screen.

    I grew up thinking these people knew more than I did. Had some kind of special access to people who were in charge. Somehow had the inside poop. And it turns out they don’t.

  112. 112.

    thomas Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: That does cheer me up. Thanks!

    May your tribe ever increase.

  113. 113.

    Ozymandias, King of Ants

    December 23, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @cleek:

    ignore her and the Invisible Hand will shoo her away!

    Wrong. McMegan is a member of that class of people who are all guaranteed to get invisible handjobs.

  114. 114.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    It’s time for the Steelers to use the bully pulpit!

  115. 115.

    thomas Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    @Ailuridae: Lacking any Pliny TE, I will soon raise a glass of something appropriate in your honor. (After taking the next generation to and from the martial arts class that will allow him to break me into small pieces soon enough).

    My thanks.

  116. 116.

    slag

    December 23, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    @thomas Levenson: And I’m strongly considering buying your Einstein book. When I end my recently self-imposed moratorium on buying stuff, that is.

    Although…I’ll probably buy it used if I can find it. Nothing against your book, it’s just that I generally prefer pre-owned books as a rule.

    On second thought, I guess this information probably isn’t going to cheer you up. Sorry about that.

    Happy Festivus!

  117. 117.

    Ozymandias, King of Ants

    December 23, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    @change:

    John Boehner is no Bob Dole

    And if you think that’s a compliment, you need a tinfoil hat.

  118. 118.

    thomas Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    @slag: Nah, its all good.

    Einstein will earn out its advance approximately at the same time that Harvard returns to the Rose Bowl. (Memo to self: never publish a book three weeks into a then very popular “little” war.)

    Readers is what I crave.

    (Now Newton…that has a very distant chance of someday earning out. More likely in the UK than here, but still. Buy e-editions if you swing that way, as my cut is much larger ;)

    This shameless commercial interlude is officially way over.

  119. 119.

    Beauzeaux

    December 23, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    McMegan has thrown up a “correction” of sorts

    It does read very much like mental vomit, doesn’t it.

  120. 120.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    @slag: Well, you have given him a grievance to air.

  121. 121.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    @srv: @Chris:

    Yep. You’re both right. I am now completely disarmed by how easy identity theft is. Ordered it through something called VitalCheck and I should receive the birth certificate in two weeks.

  122. 122.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    @Ailuridae: I wonder why the Birthers don’t use it to check up on the President.

  123. 123.

    Judas Escargot

    December 23, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    @change:

    The Red States are due for a reminder of their economic dependency.

    Good luck keeping your rubes in line once that sinks in.

  124. 124.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    @thomas Levenson:

    What martial art does your young’n do? I’ve been doing Aikido for about a decade and really, really wish I had been introduced to martial arts (at least non-boxing martial arts) in my early teens.

  125. 125.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @Beauzeaux: Would you have preferred if she had tossed off an apology of sorts?

  126. 126.

    Tim

    December 23, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @erlking:

    Does Suderman blow Sullivan to keep Eloise at the Atlantic? It’s irresponsible not to speculate… ‘cause that is some grade A bullshit Megs is dishing out.

    LOL and ew.

    THIS is the kind of delightfully obscene, insulting, gratuitous, and yet dead-on kind of comment I come to BJ for every day.

    Although, to be fair, Sullivan DOES favor homo activities featuring the IRON GLUTES or GLUTES OF TITANIUM or whatever the hell his screen name on Barebackcity.com was. Blowjobs are for amateurs.

  127. 127.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    this is a vindication of Larry Summers who said women are bad a math.

  128. 128.

    kdaug

    December 23, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @change:

    And John Boehner is no Bob Dole/..he won’t cave.

    No, he’ll cry. On the capital steps. With the cameras rolling. And America will hear about how mean Obama and the Democrats are, and how much it hurts his feelings.

    And in the meantime, there will be no funding for the troops in Af/Pak or for grandma’s dialysis.

    What’s your point – you think this is a winner?

  129. 129.

    madeinamerica

    December 23, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @thomas Levenson: I just bought the Kindle edition a few days ago. Does that help? Also, too, I’m enjoying it immensely.

  130. 130.

    Villago Delenda Est

    December 23, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    McMegan is simply a lying sack of shit. No integrity at all. No remorse for being very obviously wrong. A few degrees from the pathological falsification of Sarah Palin, who denies objective truth when it is even slightly inconvenient for her.

  131. 131.

    Tom Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    @madeinamerica: Yes it does. Thanks.

    @Ailuridae: He does Kenpo at one of the best schools for kids I’ve ever seen. (MacDonald’s Martial Arts Academy in Watertown, MA, for anyone in the area with a potential interest.) They do what all the martial arts places say the will, but really, really well: impart physical and mental confidence and self discipline/knowledge in a program that is kind, incredibly supportive, and yet thoroughly (if very gently, almost imperceptibly) disciplined and rigorous. Just really good people.

    I too wish I’d stuck with my martial arts — I did Tae Kwan Do for a couple of years in high school. Shoulda coulda woulda gotten a lot out of it if I had stayed with the art.

    Given how impressed I am with the MacDonald people, I’m actually thinking of dragging my out-of-shape, overweight, fifty + year old carcasse over there for some adult classes. That high pitched scream you are about to hear is me attempting a kick above the waist for the first time in more than three decades.

  132. 132.

    Chyron HR

    December 23, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    @kdaug:

    Hey, the Republicans just love America in their own special way. You know, the way that Ike loved Tina.

  133. 133.

    slag

    December 23, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: That’s good. I always enjoy working from my strengths.

    Review the Newton book for us sometime, please. If you get a chance.

  134. 134.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    Among Republicans, denying mistakes is not just a personality flaw, it’s a rhetorical device calculated to make it appear that (1) the criticism is unwarranted or disproportionate to the error; (2) the error is unintentional; (3) the error is trivial (4) the critic is a snippy moron who should be ignored; and (5) the Republican is a VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICTIM!

  135. 135.

    catclub

    December 23, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    @Tonal Crow:
    Roman numerals in a post about a calculator.

  136. 136.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @catclub: That took me a moment, but I’m pretty sure “VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICTIM” is not a well-formed Roman numeral string. ‘Course, Republicans don’t have well-formed consciences, so I guess it’s appropriate.

  137. 137.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    admitting mistakes is pre 9/11 thinking.

  138. 138.

    kdaug

    December 23, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @Chyron HR: Pro-tip: Go ahead and buy stock in Kimberly-Clark, makers of Kleenex (R) Brand Tissues, the Leader in Facial Tissue Softness.

    It’s gonna be a weepy few years.

  139. 139.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    @slag: The book is a bit of a bait and switch. It is like the undergrad course I took called “Biology of Human Reproduction;” non-science majors like me took it because we thought it would be about sex, but it turned out to be a biology course and we had to learn. Levenson tricks you into thinking you are going to be reading about a 17th Century Batman, and then he causes you to learn about math, science, and 17th metallurgy among other things. Honestly, it reads like a novel, is full of odd little facts, and is very good at giving the larger picture of who Newton was, what he was like, and why he is as important and influential as he is. Plus, it has a good beat and you can dance to it.

  140. 140.

    jacy

    December 23, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    And John Boehner is no Bob Dole

    He’s more oranger for one thing. You suppose he has secret malaria, or is he just descended from inbred circus folk?

  141. 141.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    Sully-Borg on yet another useless topic, publishes a richly ironic reader email:

    I am a patent lawyer with a background in biochemistry. Most of the business people at my clients don’t understand what I do, what the technology is that I am working on and generally look at us as being lawyers with “propeller” beanies on our heads and pocket protectors in our shirts. They can’t judge me on what I actually do for them, generally, in the legal sense. No one can really judge the proficiency of my work product at the time it is delivered – it has to “bake” for many years before any actual decisions are reached at the US Patent Office. They can – however – judge how “good” something looks. Do I use correct grammar and punctuation? Do I use words that they can understand? Do I format my letters and applications in a clear manner that screams “organized and authoritative”?
    __
    They judge me not on what I obtain for them through my legal skills – they judge me as a copyrighter or a graphic designer. It is the hardest thing for me to teach my younger associates that they should spend as much time on their grammar and punctuation as they do on their legal research and brilliant legal positions. In the end – we get judged by our attention to detail more than our legal acumen.

    Anybody catch it?

  142. 142.

    ThatLeftTurnInABQ

    December 23, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    @Chyron HR:

    Hey, the Republicans just love America in their own special way. You know, the way that Ike loved Tina OJ loved Nicole.

    Fixt.

    Republican slogan for 2012: If the glove doesn’t fit you must acquit!

    Republican slogan for 2016: Elect us and we’ll go out and find the real killer!

  143. 143.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    @jacy: His grandmother was a traffic cone. It is the secret shame of the Boehner family.

  144. 144.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 4:20 pm

    Um, I’m afraid that the ultimate message here is that DougJ is better at math than Megan Mccardle is.

    With all due respect to the two contenders, I am not sure that this message is all that profound. I’d expect that DougJ is better at math than most people on the planet, that’s his forte. And Megan is sort of an airhead. Not that an airhead can’t be good at math, I don’t know, that it is a topic for people who have tried to teach math to airheads. I have not done this. I have tried to teach technical subjects and airplane flying to airheads, and I have found the exercise to be frustrating, but that is just me. I don’t have infinite patience.

    In any case, I think that both DougJ and Megan will be better served by moving on from this particular bone of contention.

    Just a friendly suggestion from the friendly suggest department.

  145. 145.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    [gut laughing] Can’t…breathe.

  146. 146.

    IM

    December 23, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    @Chyron HR:

    What has love got do with it?

    It’s just a second hand emotion

  147. 147.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    @freelancer: There is at least a grammatical error (“[or] what the technology is that I am working on[,] and generally look at us as being lawyers with “propeller” beanies”) and a word-selection error (“copyrighter”). Still, the email is better-written than the vast majority of the writings I see. Although unintentionally humorous, it expresses its point clearly and relatively concisely.

  148. 148.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    @freelancer: … here all week … tip waitress… try veal… etc.

  149. 149.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    @freelancer: Thanks. I loved John’s post like comfort food. But the “528 feet in her shoes” made me giggle for two – now three – minutes.

  150. 150.

    j low

    December 23, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    and then he causes you to learn about math, science, and 17th metallurgy among other things.

    Sounds like something I should read to find out how my faith in Neal Stephenson holds up. Even if it doesn’t The Baroque Cycle is still awesome as a swashbuckling yarn.

  151. 151.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay:

    I have tried to teach technical subjects and airplane flying to airheads,

    how did shrub become a pilot, if he indeed became a pilot (note there are no photos of him flying, merely one of him being briefed on a cockpit’s instrument panel)?

  152. 152.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: That should be “17th Century metallurgy.” Fucking typos.

  153. 153.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: Apart from the irony, is it really, um, er, well, moral to attempt to teach airheads how to fly airplanes? Can an adult airhead really become grounded enough (har, har) to handle the task?

  154. 154.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    @freelancer: us /U.S., as in USPTO.

    But I agree with his general point. I love having engineers correct my sarcasm and run my neatly turned phrases through Word’s grammar checker, and then conclude they know more than I do about the subject matter at hand.

  155. 155.

    John Cole

    December 23, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    @freelancer: The ? outside the “

  156. 156.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    @Dollared: People use Word’s “grammar checker” for purposes other than idle amusement?

  157. 157.

    cynickal

    December 23, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent):

    Don’t confuse the issues. “Supporting the troops” != “Iraq was the right thing.”

    Of course not, “Supporting the Troops” = “Throwing them into every country that has our oil under their sand then de-funding their benefits and medical when they come home with broken bodies, families and lives”

  158. 158.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    @Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century):

    Almost any able bodied humanoid can be taught to move the controls by rote well enough to survive most of the time, at least under supervised conditions. I would put him in that class. But real flying and airmanship requires some judgment and some considerable situational awareness. That can’t really be taught. It can be trained up if the basic ability is there, but if it isn’t …. the results can be hilarious, or tragic, depending on the circumstances. It would be like teaching a chimpanzee to play the piano. You might make it to chopsticks and jingle bells, but Brahms 2nd Piano Concerto is not going to be doable. Okay, on that latter example, have you ever heard David Helfgott play in public? (The movie Shine was about him). I have been to a concert. Let’s just say, it was painful to sit there and listen. He’s basically a circus freak. I’d guess that this is the level of flying proficiency that Shrub reached.

  159. 159.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    @Tonal Crow:

    I agree. What killed me though was the kvetching about grammar and decent writing, and he let that slip through.

    “If you want to do well, son, you’ll mind the rules. People don’t pay attention to sloppy righters.”

    Whoopsie.

    @Dollared:

    It was the funniest thing I’ve thought of this week. I was immensly proud, too much so actually, when I typed it the first time a couple days ago. Thanks.

  160. 160.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    @Tonal Crow:

    In actual practice, the airheads do not come to the instructor with “AIRHEAD” painted on their foreheads. One has to ascertain the airheadedness by working with the student. This can be scary. Anyone who has instructed long enough has been almost killed by a student at one time or another. These make great hangar flying tales later, but the risk is real.

    Once airheadedness has been discovered, then the case needs to be escalated to the FAA, and they can handle it from there.

    Good question, though.

    I imagine that Sarah Palin would make a great instructing story.

  161. 161.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    @Another Bob: This. And she has this job because it takes a Ph.D. and absolutely no memory, a rare combination that she lacks, to get a fellowship at Cato.

  162. 162.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: “But sir, I had the stick in my gut all the way down, but the damn nose wouldn’t rise!”

  163. 163.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: what’s your expert opinion on Mccain crashing so many planes?

  164. 164.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    @freelancer: Of course, since he is an IP attorney, he could have meant “copyrighter” as an acquirer of copyrights.

  165. 165.

    slag

    December 23, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: OK. You sold me. And nicely described!

  166. 166.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    @Tonal Crow:

    Classic scenario. Often comes up on flight reviews with people who don’t really fly enough to stay sharp.

    I would set them up to do a classic climbing stall-spin entry and watch them suck the wheel into their abdominal cavity and hold on for dear life (or, death, had I not been there).

    Several turns of the spin later they are still frozen in that position unless you take the airplane away from them.

    Later, on the ground: “What was I doing wrong??”

    Oh boy. That’s why I eventually gave up instructing.

  167. 167.

    peach flavored shampoo

    December 23, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    I struggle daily to live up to Brad’s well-known standards of accuracy, fairness, and integrity; I’m sorry that I clearly failed in this instance.

    Is McAddled still in high school?

  168. 168.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 4:44 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    It’s possible, maybe even likely, but not communicating that as well, in an email about clarity of communication is just as egregious an error. In addition to that, he lumps “copyrighter” into the context next to “graphic designer”, things are decidedly NOT related to IP law, as if one must be all three or maybe even more. My instinct says he meant to write “copywriter” and slipped up.

  169. 169.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 4:45 pm

    @Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century):

    We talked about this the other day on the McCain thread.

    Basically what I said was, I have a hunch he was not that good a pilot. He strikes me as being an intemperate risk taker who would break the rules one too many times. I don’t fault him for this, it’s just a human trait that some people have. Something tells me that “Admiral’s Son” might have been his main talent for flying.

    I’ve known a lot of pilots like him. Not all of them lived to tell about it.

  170. 170.

    slag

    December 23, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    @John Cole: Personally, I hate the standard of putting the punctuation mark inside the quotation marks when it has nothing to do with the quotation. So, I don’t do it. And then I spell colour with a “u” so people will think I’m British and let me get away with it. Suck on that, American grammar rules!

    Crap…now I’m probably on some terror watch list somewhere.

  171. 171.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    @freelancer: I agree with you, and, even if he had meant what I suggested, the way he phrased it left the question open. This, of course, reinforces your original point.

  172. 172.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    @slag:

    You might have a problem getting a job on the copy desk at the newspaper.

  173. 173.

    kc

    December 23, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    The dog ate her homework, also, too.

  174. 174.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    @slag:

    Crap…now I’m probably on some terror watch list somewhere.

    If you aren’t, you should be after that kind of comment. Why do you hate America, sir? Why?

  175. 175.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    @slag: I agree about punctuation mark placement. Unless the mark is actually part of the quoted material, it doesn’t belong inside the quotes, “rules” be damned. This is a topic on which grammarians can learn from software engineers.

  176. 176.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Objection: irrelevant and argumentative.

  177. 177.

    Mark S.

    December 23, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    but I’d say at a minimum I was off by a factor of at least three

    Or ten.

    And isn’t it clear she was using nominal GDP in her original hypothetical? I suppose you could guess what the rate of inflation for the next 20 years is going to be, but why would you care? You’re arguing whether the Iraq War is going to cost over a trillion dollars over x number of years.

    Ugh, this is why I stopped reading anything regarding McMegan. It’s like falling into a bottomless pit of nonsense. You can tell, though, that she is very used to bullshitting her way out of trouble.

  178. 178.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @Tonal Crow: I will rephrase… “What is wrong with good old American punctuation, sir? Do you refuse to use it because of your hatred of America? Is that it?”

  179. 179.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @Tonal Crow:

    Just do it:

    When dealing with direct speech, American rules place periods and commas inside the quotation marks all the time, but the alternative usage varies. In fiction, both styles are the same.[11] In non-fiction, British publishers may permit placing punctuation that is not part of the person’s speech inside the quotation marks but prefer that it be placed outside.[11] According to the Cambridge Handbook for Editors, Copy-editors and Proofreaders, periods and commas that are part of the person’s speech are permitted inside the quotation marks regardless.[11]

    * “Today,” said Cinderella, “I feel free from care and anxiety.” (both major styles)
    * “Today”, said former Prime Minister Tony Blair, “I feel free from care and anxiety.” (British non-fiction only)
    * “I feel happy,” said Björk, “carefree, and well.” (both major styles)

    Many American style guides explicitly permit periods and commas outside the quotation marks when the presence of the punctuation mark inside the quotation marks will lead to ambiguity, such as when describing keyboard input:

    * To use a long dash on Wikipedia, type in “—”.

    In all major forms of English, question marks and exclamation marks are placed inside or outside quoted material depending on whether they apply to the whole sentence or just the quoted portion, but colons and semicolons are always placed outside.[12]

    * Did he say, “Good morning, Dave”?
    * No, he said, “Where are you, Dave?”
    * There are three definitions of the word “gender”: colloquial, sociological, and linguistic.

    In the first two sentences above, only one punctuation mark is used at the end of each. Regardless of its placement, only one end mark (?, !, or .) can end a sentence in American English. Only the period, however, cannot end a quoted sentence when it does not also end the enclosing sentence, except for literal text:

    * “Hello, world,” she said.
    * “Hello, world!” she exclaimed.
    * “Is there anybody out there?” she asked into the void.
    * “Goodnight, stars. Goodnight, moon,” she whispered.
    * The name of the film was, he replied, “E.T.,” which many already knew.

    References: Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition; Hart’s Rules for Compositors and Readers at the University Press, Oxford; Merriam-Webster’s Guide to Punctuation and Style, second edition.

  180. 180.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay:

    Look what I started. Time to start drinking.

  181. 181.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    @freelancer:

    Ah, now there is something we can all agree on!

    First round is on me.

  182. 182.

    WereBear

    December 23, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    @thomas Levenson: (Now Newton…that has a very distant chance of someday earning out. More likely in the UK than here, but still. Buy e-editions if you swing that way, as my cut is much larger ;)

    Just got your Newton book for my Kindle. Shameless, indeed :)

    It’s a Festivus Miracle!

  183. 183.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    Apropos of nothing really – Ezra Klein on the doctor scarcity issue and health care costs. Luckily Ezra writes one of these a month and that spares me from starting a blog.

    America’s long term fiscal issues is a health care cost control problems. The primary driver of health care costs is/are doctor compensation and provider profits (often one in the same). One of the many reasons doctors are compensated so outrageously is they have introduced an arbitrary supply constraint (too few doctors graduate from US medical schools every year) that heightens the demand on each individual doctor. And, yes, that is pretty much the description of a cartel.

  184. 184.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: I still need to pack. Dammit.

  185. 185.

    Mike Kay (Democrat of the Century)

    December 23, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: in 1988, when the dan quayle draft dodging scandal erupted, they sent shrub on NBC news and he said it was no big deal to have someone make some calls on you’re behalf and that he had served in the Guard and that Guard pilots were better than actual vietnam combat pilots.

    It was pure bush: smirking, making it all about himself, full of shit

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMj_S_KwahI&feature=player_embedded

  186. 186.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: That’s nice, but you know that Word’s Grammar Checker has made you completely obsolete.

    And when Apple unveils its Grammar Chooser, it will automatically correct the color palette across your entire document, and get a different shirt out of your closet to better match your pants.

    And when Google unveils its Grammarer, it will review the past records it has of the inside of your brain and rewrite your document to precisely match what you really meant – unless, of course, there are synonyms involved.

    So you can just put that Chicago book away, buster.

  187. 187.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    @Ailuridae: Yet another problem that would be utterly simple to solve, yet somehow doesn’t get solved.

    Too bad Pete Peterson couldn’t do something about the deficit, like endow 10,000 new scholarships to medical school per year. But he feels just helpless….

  188. 188.

    handy

    December 23, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    Grammarer

    Nicely done.

  189. 189.

    PurpleGirl

    December 23, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    McMegan is full of it to excuse her shoddy work by claiming gastritius.

    Back in 1994 I was secretary supporting a group of 25+ people. I typed their letters, formatting teaching materials (charts, tables, captions to drawings, etc.). That was when I began having problems in my lower back. I would manage to get into the office, type a bunch of stuff for a few hours, put the raw file on a small disk, take the disk home and lie down on the bed and proceed to format and finalize the files for printing out the next day. I had to stay perfectly still while I held the keyboard on my stomach. I was in excruciating and constant pain. This was my routine for about 3 months, until I had surgery.

  190. 190.

    asiangrrlMN

    December 23, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    @freelancer: I spotted a few in addition to ones already mentioned.

    Most of the business people at my clients don’t understand what I do (delete comma) (or) what the technology is that I am working on(,) and (they)generally look at us as being lawyers with propeller (delete quotes) beanies on our heads and pocket protectors in our shirts.

    Admittedly, the deletion of the quotes is a stylistic thing (I HATE quotes being tossed around random (OK, I know they aren’t random, but they might as well be) words to “make” a “point”.), but I’m old-school in that. Here’s another stylistic thing.

    In the end (delete the hyphen) (,) we get judged by our attention to detail more than our legal acumen.

    Again, I’m old school.

    But, in general, it’s well-written.

    @Ailuridae: Ack. Sorry to hear that. Glad it got straighten out so easily, but yeah, a little discomfiting that it is so easy.

    My personal anecdote: I flew somewhere a few months ago, and as I presented my license to the TSA guy, he said, “I hope you’re not driving.” My license was expired (by half a year!), and I didn’t know it. I didn’t get a notice, either. I took care of it as soon as I got back from my trip, but yeah. Not a good thing to find out six months later.

    As for MM2, I don’t think there’s anything she can do that would get her canned. Depressing.

  191. 191.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    @Dollared:

    Obsolescence is really my best look.

    I like the software future you describe, too. You mean, software that won’t ask me the same question EVERY SINGLE TIME I MAKE THE CHOICE FOR TEN YEARS and never remembers that I have made the same selection ten thousand times but still makes me choose again, and forever …. is actually on the drawing boards? I don’t believe it.

    Did I really want to say I don’t believe it? Okay – Cancel. Yes, that’s why I FUCKING SAID IT.

    Heh.

    Don’t argue with me when I am drinking.

  192. 192.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    Y’all will enjoy this.

    This link will take you to a press release about New York State’s suit against Ernst & Young for cooking Lehman’s books. There’s a link to a pdf copy of the complaint.

    http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2010/dec/dec21a_10.html

    If New York can prove this, EY is in a world of hurt. Not only will they have to disgorge all of the fees they earned from Lehman (and the press release’s estimate of $150 million is absurdly low, my guess would be more like $400 million), the PCAOB will have to take action. That action could, and arguably should, include barring EY from auditing any public companies.

    Big Three, anyone?

  193. 193.

    lambaste

    December 23, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    On top of everything else, she obfuscates the “correction” with a bunch of mumbo-jumbo, making it seem like a matter of interpretation rather than simple math.

  194. 194.

    Glinda

    December 23, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    Math is hard for conservative girls.

  195. 195.

    thomas Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    @j low: Stephenson is damned good. I had to not read the Baroque Cycle while writing my version of Newton because I didn’t want his dinning in my [email protected]Omnes Omnibus: Thanks for this very kind precis. If I’d only called the book “Newton’s Sex Life,” it could have been a contender.
    @Dollared: IIRC, McArdle is a business school graduate — e.g. she possesses an MBA, (which I think Chicago should be asking her to return) and not a Ph.D.

  196. 196.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    @thomas Levenson: You are quite welcome. I enjoyed the book, and I know my father will as well. As far as the alternative title, IIRC, (spoiler alert) wouldn’t it have been a bit of a misnomer or a very short book (/spoiler alert)?

  197. 197.

    asiangrrlMN

    December 23, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    @slag: I’m with you. I do the same. There is no reason to put the punctuation in the quote marks if it’s not part of the quote. Harrumph. I also spell theatre the proper way. Damn. I’ll join you on your terrorist list.

    @Omnes Omnibus: But, that is correct usage of the punctuation inside the quotes. So, I have no beef with you there!

  198. 198.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    After Enron why was it decided to continue having private auditing firms again?

  199. 199.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    @thomas Levenson: Yes. After all, she just proved she has some sort of memory capacity today, although it appears to have a garbage-in, garbage-out problem.

  200. 200.

    Tonal Crow

    December 23, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    @Glinda:

    Math is hard for conservative girls.

    That’s because math is about truth.

  201. 201.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    @Ailuridae: Arthur Andersen was an aberration.

    Wow, I typed that with a straight face.

  202. 202.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    @Dollared:

    Ah this one is sadly all on doctors. It is regulatory capture in it’s most pure form.

    @thomas Levenson:

    She indeed has a Chicago MBA. For a while I used to post a “Fellow alum who I am most embarrassed about today” and was glad to learn McMegan went to B School there as I was getting tired of rotating between Bobo, Broder and whatever Nobel Prize winning economist demonstrated they didn’t understand monetary policy that day.

  203. 203.

    KevinA

    December 23, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    Is she REALLLLLY posting in the comments on that post as “McMegan?”

    Can I haz sum self-awareness, plz?

  204. 204.

    asiangrrlMN

    December 23, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    @Glinda: But I thought MM2 was a libertarian who would have voted for Obama if she had registered in time? Are you telling me that, gasp, she’s not? Oh, the horrors!

    I loved math–especially calculus. I guess that means by default, I’m not conservative.

  205. 205.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    @Ailuridae:

    Because “anecdote” and “data” are not synonyms.

  206. 206.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    Wow, I typed that with a straight face.

    You must be an experienced litigator if you can type that with a straight face.

  207. 207.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I had a lot of classmates start at Arthur Andersen and used to enjoy trekking out to see them while they were in training. Their training more closely resembled college fraternity hazing though. I was once out therefor a full week for a break and Monday to Saturday the whole group was out every night getting plastered on the bars on Main Street (St Charles is kind of quaint) etc. And none of their trainers were upset about this because they knew this was the expected behavior with clients on the job.

    Same thing with friends that started at Price Waterhouse around the same time. Except that training was in Tampa so more strip clubs were involved.

  208. 208.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    @burnspbesq: I can type just about anything with a straight face. I am good at motion practice. Saying it aloud, in front of people, is another kettle of fish.

  209. 209.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    @Ailuridae:

    Seriously, why do you think that would solve the problem? The evidence from places like Japan and Mexico, where there are quasi-public statutory auditors, isn’t especially supportive of your case.

    If you go to a system of public auditors, you’ll end up with a revolving door. The financial incentives to go along with clients who want to do crazy shit won’t go away, they will just change form.

    I’m in favor of more criminal cases being brought under the securities laws.

  210. 210.

    WereBear

    December 23, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    @burnspbesq: While visions of successful prosecutions danced in their heads.

  211. 211.

    aimai

    December 23, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    Everyone here has pointed out the other most galling things about Megan but I think there’s room for one more point, maybe its the one I always make about Megan but so sue me already.

    Here it is. Megan’s whole shtick is some sort of personal girl’s bio of privatizing wealth and socializing loss. Megan’s work doesn’t take place in a vacuum–her posts, essays, tweets and even her god damned marriage are entirely functions of her job as an apologist for Republican politics and economics. When she is writing she writes for them–her conclusions are fixed and only the method of getting there shifts. When she’s right, I presume (I’ve never seen it) she and her philosophy take all the credit. When she’s wrong, and she’s caught out in a lie, a total misstatement, a deceptive sleight of graph suddenly its all just a little, tiny, personal mistake that we should put down to dodgy tummy, food poisoning, asthma, wedding jitters, veganism, or whatever else she can summon up as an excuse. The fact that she said what she said because she was paid to say it simply drops out of the picture. Indeed, the very notion that her writing matters drops out of the discussion (check out her pro side commenters who routinely attack readers for reading her seriously as “crazy” and “stalkers” who “can’t let go” of a “little blog post” that happened “years ago.”

    aimai

  212. 212.

    Omnes Omnibus

    December 23, 2010 at 5:35 pm

    @Ailuridae: I lived in Geneva until I was 11. As an undergrad, AA was the destination of choice for many of my school’s econ majors. I wonder how many of them got caught up in the Enron mess.

  213. 213.

    Comrade Mary

    December 23, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    Now you’ve done it, John. The title has started this running through my head, chased by this. Ah, the music of my teens …

  214. 214.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    @burnspbesq:

    I don’t think it necessarily would solve the problem. But I can’t see anyway that having private auditing firms compensated by the firms they are auditing will ever work consistently. Same goes with rating agencies.

  215. 215.

    Buoyant Citrus

    December 23, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    We’re talking about the business and economics editor of a supposedly serious magazine who once prefered to say that she doesn’t own a calculator that shows 10 digits rather than admit that she was wrong (actually, the data was obviously made up to support her position, but let’s not ask too much of her)
    In what kind of alternate universe does someone in her position looks better by saying THAT?

  216. 216.

    freelancer

    December 23, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    @aimai:

    Nailed it.

  217. 217.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    As MacLean and Elkind pointed out in “The Smartest Guys in the Room,” in the Andersen culture, where fee-earners could tell the national office technical types to fuck off and make it stick, something like Enron was inevitable. It was just random chance that it turned out to be Enron and not some other client.

    KPMG, because of its near-death experience with tax shelters, is probably pretty clean and careful right now. The other three, perhaps not so much.

  218. 218.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: You may notice that I work near software developers. I can assure you that they do indeed software that notices your choices and adjusts. But it will never, ever, ever tell you when it has adjusted and when it will adjust back. That would spoil all the fun.

  219. 219.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    @Dollared:

    I slung code for 30 years. I know the rules.

    Stupid (ab)users!

  220. 220.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    Merde.

    We had about six hours of partial sunshine, but it’s back to overcast.

  221. 221.

    Dollared

    December 23, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    @aimai: thanks for repeating.

    I’ll add my take, and I really know nothing about her: I assume she has always had a great relationship with her dad, a genial, self confident man who is successful in business or the professions. And who taught her about success, and the shiftless poor, and Roosevelt’s betrayal of his class.

  222. 222.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    Speaking of Bethany MacLean, I am reading “All the Devils Are Here,” her book with Joe Nocera about the financial crisis. It is not helping me keep my blood pressure under control.

  223. 223.

    Ailuridae

    December 23, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus:

    I got lost snow shoeing out of a base camp in Geneva five years ago. Pretty country. Less so when you think you might die.

    Our high end econ folks all either went to grad school or went into I-Banking. And then some went into management consulting (Anderson consulting versus Arthur Anderson) mostly at DeLoitte and PW(C). The people who ended up @ AA were almost all Public Policy majors (and at Chicago that meant that you were an econidiot who couldn’t handle statistics that included calculus).

    I was really happy that nobody I knew/remembered from that training group was caught up in the Enron mess. Despite knowing a lot of people in the I-Banking world I am also glad to see that none of them are getting perp walked despite knowing that several of them probably should have been.

  224. 224.

    j low

    December 23, 2010 at 5:51 pm

    @thomas Levenson: Don’t have an ereader so i just ordered the Newton book on Amazon. Wish I would have thought of it earlier, cause my holiday weekend habitation is going to be a cabin in the woods with no modern comforts besides fire. Would’ve been the perfect place to revisit Newton.

  225. 225.

    something fabulous

    December 23, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    @LikeableInMyOwnWay: Late to the thread, as ever, but I respectfully disagree. As the self-professed resident Math Moran, I think the real point is not, never had been, about her ability to do any sort of accurate math, but rather this:

    How about I can’t reproduce what I did in a throwaway line eight years out, so I don’t know whether there was a math error, or whether I used some assumptions that I would now not use—or even whether I used some assumptions that I would now use, if my 8-years-ago self could argue with me today. Probably a math error, but I don’t know.

    …Which to me indicates that she views it as acceptable or appropriate to even think about calculations about the cost of war to be “a throwaway.” It’s the foundation of her thinking.

    What does that say about her? That’s what, IMO, pointing out her flippancy is for.

    PS for John @ OP: While we’re on the subject of proofreading, I think you mean “Iraqi War” rather than “Gulf War,” which was of course over by then and therefore not eligible for projections… Otherwise, entirely co-signed.

  226. 226.

    burnspbesq

    December 23, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    @WereBear:

    While visions of successful prosecutions danced in their heads

    And I heard him exclaim, as he rode out of sight,
    “Throw their asses in jail, and to all a good night.”

  227. 227.

    bago

    December 23, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    @Tonal Crow: 110% agree. Contextual definition FTW!

  228. 228.

    WereBear

    December 23, 2010 at 6:08 pm

    @aimai: Megan’s work doesn’t take place in a vacuum—her posts, essays, tweets and even her god damned marriage are entirely functions of her job as an apologist for Republican politics and economics.

    Gah. I don’t know if there is enough money in the world.

    If there is, I hope I would do it like Batman, staying up all night to do Good and then blaming my mistakes on lack of sleep. That would be the way to do it…

  229. 229.

    bago

    December 23, 2010 at 6:18 pm

    @Dollared: Unless you look at the logs.

  230. 230.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    @something fabulous:

    Yes. I was being facetious. Something seldom done here, therefore totally unexpected.

  231. 231.

    LikeableInMyOwnWay

    December 23, 2010 at 6:35 pm

    @bago:

    Real men don’t insert code to write to logs.

    Heh.

  232. 232.

    thomas Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 6:42 pm

    @j low: Add an alchemical still and you’d pretty much have Newton’s shed outside the chapel at Trinity. ;)

    I hope the book rewards your attention.

  233. 233.

    thomas Levenson

    December 23, 2010 at 6:42 pm

    @aimai: Exactly so, and bears any number of repetitions.

  234. 234.

    Peter

    December 23, 2010 at 7:20 pm

    This is easy for you to say, John, after you demoted DougJ from business and economics editor, a lofty position where he was making either 10 or 100 times what he’s making as just a regular front-pager.

    Have you no sense of human decency?

  235. 235.

    Tattoosydney

    December 23, 2010 at 7:54 pm

    @thomas Levenson:

    Buy e-editions if you swing that way, as my cut is much larger ;)

    This title is not available for customers from Australia.

  236. 236.

    jayackroyd

    December 23, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    From McMegan’s comment thread:

    McMegan:

    “I was raised with a strong cultural aversion to discussing salaries.”

    I am beginning to think Tom commissioned a Galtian Eliza program from the MIT folk.

  237. 237.

    lol

    December 23, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    @Ailuridae:

    I’ve moved around the country a lot and I’ve also had a (now ex-) girlfriend who had a habit of losing her identity documents. Having to repeatedly get driver’s licenses and recover documents has made me a lot less sympathetic to the “we should require IDs in order to vote!” crowd given the time and money required to get one. Taking 1-2 days off to deal with this stuff is not an insubstantial expense.

    As someone pointed out, you can order your birth certificate on-line without too much problem, assuming you remember your personal details (SSN, birthdate, etc). It may do some credit report style verification (loans, addresses workplace) when you order as well. This is the easy piece.

    SSA requires photo ID. DMV requires SSN. Seems like a catch-22 but it’s not.

    Dig through your recent paystubs (and similar docs) for anything that has you name and SSN printed on it. That should be sufficient for the DMV in your state.

    In any case, renewing or replacing an ID is a lot easier than getting a brand new one issued so they may not require anything beyond your birth certificate.

    One you get the proper photo ID, go to the SSA to get a new card mailed to you. From there, order a passport with ID card. That way you’ll have two items that can stand in for photo ID and birth certificate if you run into this problem in the future. (And you won’t have to madly rush to get them if you decide to travel out of country.)

  238. 238.

    anon

    December 23, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    I know noone cares but #57 up there from cleek I read as “A: because she brings tits.

    Q: why would an on-line magazine employ a blogger?
    A: because he/she brings hits.

    ignore her and the Invisible Hand will shoo her away!

  239. 239.

    Wile E. Quixote

    December 23, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    The fact that McArdle has an MBA from the University of Chicago reveals two things.

    1) That getting an MBA from isn’t that hard if McMegan McArdle and George W. Bush can get one.

    2) That the University of Chicago business and econ departments are a total fucking joke.

  240. 240.

    Glinda

    December 23, 2010 at 9:39 pm

    @Tonal Crow: Exactly!

  241. 241.

    birthmarker

    December 23, 2010 at 9:42 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: Oh, hell, I am buying the damn thing.

  242. 242.

    Glinda

    December 23, 2010 at 9:45 pm

    @asiangrrlMN: McMegan is an espoused “Libertarian” but evidences that she thinks that the “libertarian” label means knee-jerk antipathy to government spending of any sort.

    Although I’m sure she makes a cute souffle for her dinner parties.

    Shorthand: McMegan is a dumb broad which might explain her difficulty/horror with math.

  243. 243.

    LongHairedWeirdo

    December 23, 2010 at 10:55 pm

    That’s what I would have written. Although, in fairness, I have had a lot of practice being wrong.

    No… you have a lot of practice in *caring about getting it right*. A huge, huge difference. If you really care about getting it right, then it’s natural for you to want to correct the record when you’re wrong.

    People who care about Being Right – actually, about being viewed as being right – write shitty apologies because they don’t actually care about getting it right. Since they don’t care about getting it right, the embarrassment of apologizing is all they remember… whereas people who want to get it right might also be embarrassed, but there’s a bit of pride, too, in doing the right thing.

  244. 244.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    December 24, 2010 at 12:01 am

    @burnspbesq:

    And I heard him exclaim, as he rode out of sight waved his goodbye,
    “Throw their asses in jail, and to all a good night the ropes over lamp posts, and hang them all high.”

    Fix’t.

  245. 245.

    Brad DeLong

    December 24, 2010 at 12:22 am

    Let me just say that this:

    “I struggle daily to live up to Brad’s well-known standards of accuracy, fairness, and integrity”

    is a most precious gift indeed.

  246. 246.

    Zuzu's Petals

    December 24, 2010 at 2:06 am

    Good God, it’s even worse than I thought. Check out this exchange in the comments over there:

    clawback 16 hours ago
    __
    DeLong is right about what? He made no comment about the issue, only quoted from the discussion initiated by DougJBalloon. Then, instead of simply acknowledging Doug’s point, you act as if DeLong brought it up. Classy.

    McMegan 16 hours ago in reply to clawback
    __
    You’re right, fixed–named him in the post.

    Aaaannnd…THIS is how she fixed it by naming DougJ in the post:

    Yup, Brad DeLong is right: I probably made a math error eight years ago, and didn’t see it when it was initially pointed out to me by commenter Doug J. … I struggle daily to live up to Brad’s well-known standards of accuracy, fairness, and integrity; I’m sorry that I clearly failed in this instance.

    Shouldn’t this kind of stupidity be painful?

  247. 247.

    erlking

    December 24, 2010 at 9:10 am

    @Tim: LOL and ew back to you my friend.

    Now I need to work the phrase, “Blowjobs are for amateurs” into the conversation at the holiday party this evening.

  248. 248.

    LosGatosCA

    December 24, 2010 at 11:41 am

    Shouldn’t this kind of stupidity be painful?

    Eight years worth for the literate blogosphere, and judging from her chronic condition, eight more at least. OTOH, it may not be actual stupidity as much as a handicap. In which case The Atlantic should actually be lauded for paying her. But autistic savant she ain’t.

    But as HRoman Hruska would have put it, even mediocre people need representation among the economic editors in the blogosphere. The question is though, do they have to outnumber the readers?

  249. 249.

    Another Bob

    December 24, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    @Dollared:

    And she has this job because it takes a Ph.D. and absolutely no memory, a rare combination that she lacks, to get a fellowship at Cato.

    But still, her audacity and her shamelessness at least partly makes up for that. I think that the corporate establishment is getting some solid work out of her, and she’s undoubtedly well worth her pay to them.

  250. 250.

    henqiguai

    December 24, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    @Tom Levenson (#131):

    I too wish I’d stuck with my martial arts—I did Tae Kwan Do for a couple of years in high school. Shoulda coulda woulda gotten a lot out of it if I had stayed with the art.

    Yang’s Martial Arts; Long Fist (if you’re feelin’ gutsy) or Tai Chi otherwise. If I lived closer I’d be all over his Crane courses.

  251. 251.

    RobNYNY1957

    December 25, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    I have an MBA (called an MM) from one of Chicago’s big competitors, the Kellogg School at Northwestern. It was a collossal joke. The most that you could have classes was 4 days a week, and if you were clever you have almost all of your classes on two days a week, with maybe a 1.5 hour seminar on the third day. The financial accounting course, the managerial accounting course and one strategic management course were worthwhile, but the accouting courses would have been virtually the same at community college.

    My concentration was in finance, and somehow I took two years of finance courses without ever hearing any professor mention LIBOR. (The professors all wanted to price options, so that’s what we did.) I proudly say that I got a C in business ethics class (the only correct answer, which I did not give, was that nothing your employer could do is so bad that you need to resign or report them to the authorities). In one of my marketing classes, the only coursework that was required was a 28-question multiple-choice exam, and the correct answer to four questions was, “D–Hire a marketing consultant.”

    I’ve quizzed recent grads of other MBA schools, and things don’t seem to have changed much.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. OK — Here’s One Grievance « Elia Isquire says:
    December 23, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    […] Megan McArdle is a successful blogger/journalist while I’m living in a van down by the river. […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Alison Rose on SunBund Report: Squeaky Wheels Edition (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:55pm)
  • Betty Cracker on SunBund Report: Squeaky Wheels Edition (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:51pm)
  • gvg on SunBund Report: Squeaky Wheels Edition (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:51pm)
  • Repatriated on SunBund Report: Squeaky Wheels Edition (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:50pm)
  • Ruckus on Squishable Early Morning Open Thread (Mar 28, 2023 @ 1:48pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!