• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

This blog will pay for itself.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

Take your GOP plan out of the witness protection program.

Let’s not be the monsters we hate.

Infrastructure week. at last.

Everybody saw this coming.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

They traffic in fear. it is their only currency. if we are fearful, they are winning.

Their freedom requires your slavery.

Come on, man.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

Damn right I heard that as a threat.

The worst democrat is better than the best republican.

Come on, media. you have one job. start doing it.

Let there be snark.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

… riddled with inexplicable and elementary errors of law and fact

The revolution will be supervised.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Civil Rights / Women's Rights / The War On Women / Rush: Still Losing

Rush: Still Losing

by $8 blue check mistermix|  March 4, 20128:48 am| 100 Comments

This post is in: The War On Women

FacebookTweetEmail

The latest ad by Rush Limbaugh's new ad agency.

I saw this in a local coffee shop yesterday–it’s for a couple of third-tier religious/talk-radio stations, one of which headlines Michael Savage. This is where Rush is headed if he keeps it up. The scorecard on his advertisers is brutal. He’s lost six, including Carbonite backup, who dropped him last night after his lame apology and did it with a tough statement from the CEO:

No one with daughters the age of Sandra Fluke, and I have two, could possibly abide the insult and abuse heaped upon this courageous and well-intentioned young lady. Mr. Limbaugh, with his highly personal attacks on Miss Fluke, overstepped any reasonable bounds of decency. Even though Mr. Limbaugh has now issued an apology, we have nonetheless decided to withdraw our advertising from his show. We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse.

People have been boycotting Rush forever, and obviously Carbonite didn’t give a shit about civilized public discourse then, which makes the politics of this very interesting. First, Obama’s call had to be a tipping point, and it was a pitch perfect way to criticize Rush without getting down in the muck with him. Second, with the current state of the Republican party, there’s no need to worry about them meeting us halfway on any issue. Here’s a bit of claim chowder from Amanda Marcotte that’s still fresh:

“Some women aren’t even taking the birth control pill for contraception! They need it for cramps/endometriosis/etc.”
Every time you say this, a right winger wanting to imply that women who have sex for pleasure are sluts gets his wings. This statement and all variations on it feeds into the right wing claim that a) contraception is not health care and b) that women who have sex for pleasure are so indefensible that you have to lean on off-label uses for a contraceptive drug to justify its existence. It also does absolutely nothing to defend the non-pill contraception that’s covered by the health care act, such as IUDs or sterilization. Plus, that gives them an easy out, which is to say that they’re fine with insurance covering pills that are prescribed for non-contraception use, but just object to prescriptions for women who use them to prevent pregnancy.

I don’t disagree with the ideology of that post, but in hindsight the politics are wrong. Fluke’s testimony, as John pointed out, was all about the use of the pill for ovarian cysts. It didn’t matter, she was still called a slut, but the extreme reasonableness of Fluke’s position made Rush look even more unreasonable. Marcotte’s critique is sort of the flip side of Obama’s attempt to draw the Republicans into compromise over healthcare reform or deficit reduction. In each case, the underlying wrong assumption is that Republicans will make a politically smart compromise to advance their agenda. Any argument that makes that assumption in the 2012 campaign should be immediately suspect.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « When I marry Mrs. Snowe
Next Post: Another Mitt Win »

Reader Interactions

100Comments

  1. 1.

    jo6pac

    March 4, 2012 at 8:53 am

    Yep maybe this is what will the fat guys down fall and it hurts willard also since his investment comp. owns clear channel. The company that ruined more radio stations and concert venues than I can count.

  2. 2.

    MattF

    March 4, 2012 at 8:57 am

    I disagree. It’s important to keep repeating the fact that every pregnancy, including every ‘normal’ one, is a health issue. Of course, all women know that, but sluts like Limbaugh just don’t get it. And that’s a political win for reality-based health care.

  3. 3.

    Linda Featheringill

    March 4, 2012 at 9:00 am

    I’d like to see somebody try to hold Romney at least partially responsible for Limbaugh. That would probably be a futile exercise but it would be fun to watch even so.

  4. 4.

    chopper

    March 4, 2012 at 9:00 am

    Every time you say this, a right winger wanting to imply that women who have sex for pleasure are sluts gets his wings. This statement and all variations on it feeds into the right wing claim that a) contraception is not health care and b) that women who have sex for pleasure are so indefensible that you have to lean on off-label uses for a contraceptive drug to justify its existence.

    yeah, i gotta agree that the fact that fluke’s testimony was all about those off-label uses is kinda central to this whole thing, at least in terms of pointing out how crazy the goopers are being. it really gets to the point that no matter how they want to make it about something else like ‘religious liberty’ it really is all about slut shaming with these guys, despite the fact that she didn’t say a thing about her own sex life or if she’s even on the pill at all.

    yet it’s true that in the larger argument leaning on those as a main defense of contraception appears to be ceding the field to the junior anti-sex league.

  5. 5.

    JPL

    March 4, 2012 at 9:02 am

    The war on women continues.

  6. 6.

    reflectionephemeral

    March 4, 2012 at 9:03 am

    I think you’re making a slightly different point than Marcotte. You’re arguing that the noncontroversial nature of Fluke’s advocacy made her attackers even less defensible than they would’ve been otherwise– which is true enough.

    Marcotte, I think, is making the broader cultural point that in debate & conversation, we should be sure not to implicitly concede Limbaugh’s “argument”: that people on birth control to prevent conception are doing something bad or shameful.

    If I’ve accurately got those 2 positions, then I think you’re both right.

  7. 7.

    reflectionephemeral

    March 4, 2012 at 9:05 am

    Her attackers were “even less defensible” politically, as in this CEO’s statement, I meant.

  8. 8.

    JPL

    March 4, 2012 at 9:05 am

    @Linda Featheringill: Maureen Dowd’s column mentioned that she would like to know what word Romney would use if that’s what he found offensive.

  9. 9.

    lonesomerobot

    March 4, 2012 at 9:10 am

    @reflectionephemeral: By all means, don’t talk about what positions you’ve got. Rush will call you a slut.

  10. 10.

    cathyx

    March 4, 2012 at 9:10 am

    I hope Rush defends himself some more on his show on Monday. Maybe the rest of the advertisers will leave.

  11. 11.

    Southern Beale

    March 4, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Carbonite also advertises on liberal talk shows — Thom Hartmann, Stephanie Miller and Ed Schultz all do spots for them. I wonder if that played into their decision in any way?

  12. 12.

    chopper

    March 4, 2012 at 9:12 am

    @MattF:

    right. both the regular use of the pill, as well as these ‘off-label’ uses, are both intended to perform the same basic function: prevention of an unwanted medical condition.

    if people, in the larger argument, make it all about things like ovarian cysts some chump in the senate is going to call our bluff and cough up some turd of a bill allowing a religious or personal ‘moral exemption’ for paying for the pill except in uses like preventing ovarian cysts etc. then suddenly we’re shifting gears and arguing that it really is all about sexual freedom.

    besides, as long as the argument is about basic access to contraception we win. that’s why limbaugh stepped in it. the GOP has been trying desperately to turn the argument towards religious freedom but the big names in the party just can’t help but yell at some sluts.

  13. 13.

    BigWoodenSpoon

    March 4, 2012 at 9:12 am

    I’m impressed – every word on that sign is spelled correctly.

  14. 14.

    cathyx

    March 4, 2012 at 9:12 am

    @reflectionephemeral: I wouldn’t be surprised if the majority of women who take the pill are married.

  15. 15.

    Hal

    March 4, 2012 at 9:18 am

    “Some women aren’t even taking the birth control pill for contraception! They need it for cramps/endometriosis/etc.”

    But I feel like this shouldn’t even have to be the emphasized point. So what if women use birth control to avoid pregnancy while having sex? The massive hypocrisy coming from the right is that they are all having sex, most are probably using birth control, and those who have jobs with health insurance may in fact be getting that birth control free.

    This year in particular highlights how absolutely desperate and out of touch Republicans have become. Horrible candidates, horrific choices in which issues to highlight, and some amazing limp ass attacks on the President.

    At this point, all the GOP can do is promise $2.50 gas and to take away women’s birth control.

  16. 16.

    Southern Beale

    March 4, 2012 at 9:18 am

    Today’s blogwhore: my take on the Mormon church’s baptism of the dead thing. It’s a personal story.

  17. 17.

    Amir Khalid

    March 4, 2012 at 9:19 am

    There are still some who don’t get it. I just saw this headline on Yahoo News:

    Obama rings up Limbaugh’s ‘slut,’ Georgetown’s Sandra Fluke

    Here’s a headline that says the same thing without repeating the insult:

    Obama rings up Georgetown student insulted by Rush Limbaugh

  18. 18.

    lonesomerobot

    March 4, 2012 at 9:20 am

    That sign picture just makes me wonder what the whackjobs thought the timing of Obama’s inevitable destruction of America was supposed to be. I mean, Breitbart supposedly had this bombshell tape and everything; and the point still seems to be to stop Obama from imposing New World Order or dictatorship or taking all our guns (all of the above?). But we were told in 2008 that Obama was the Manchurian Candidate and had the New Black Panthers and the black- and brownshirts all lined up to turn this place into Socialist Nazi Germany faster than John McCain could recall how many houses he owned.

    Well? Dude’s in the 4th year of his presidency. Any plan to destroy America by the man who pals around with terrorists would have to be enacted a bit more efficiently than that, wouldn’t it? Or do you slow-walk the whole despotic tyranny thing until you barely win reelection? It just doesn’t seem to be playing out like they all hoped… er, I mean feared. Either that or Bill Ayers must be some kind of super-genius.

  19. 19.

    lonesomerobot

    March 4, 2012 at 9:21 am

    @Amir Khalid: Yesterday they were giving the Breitbart conspiracy theories some play as well. Nice going, Yahoo.

  20. 20.

    chopper

    March 4, 2012 at 9:23 am

    @cathyx:

    yeah, i would love to see some ads targeting married women on the pill (and there are a hell of a lot of them out there), telling them in big bold letters that the GOP thinks they’re all nasty sluts and prostitutes.

  21. 21.

    Michael

    March 4, 2012 at 9:25 am

    Carbonite CEO:

    We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse.

    That’s sweet, but he’s obviously not familiar with the Peak Wingnut theory; and with the general election season still months away, no, we haven’t reached it yet.

  22. 22.

    Donut

    March 4, 2012 at 9:25 am

    I like that Axelrod is needling Romney via Twitter about Rush, and I believe Obama should continue to give a full-throated embrace of championing women’s health issues, not to mention standing up for that old radical idea that women are people and all – but I agree the phone call to Fluke was pitch-perfect and the president doesn’t need to say much more, definitely should say nothing at all about Limbaugh.

    It’s time for activists to not just go after Rush’s sponsors. Time to go after the stations that carry him and the show’s distribution company.

    The whale of Rush’s career is listing, lost, wounded and heading for the beach. This is no time to let up.

  23. 23.

    JGabriel

    March 4, 2012 at 9:25 am

    FYI, Y’all:

    White House Petition to remove Limbaugh’s show from Armed Forces Radio.

    .

  24. 24.

    chopper

    March 4, 2012 at 9:28 am

    @JPL:

    as much as modo is a moron, this would be an excellent direct question for a reporter to ask mittens. if only.

  25. 25.

    Frank

    March 4, 2012 at 9:29 am

    @Southern Beale:

    It really is amusing. Mormons believe that being gay is a choice but on the other hand they won’t allow people’s choice not to be Mormons to stay after they are dead.

    I shouldn’t say amusing. It is revolting. I am assuming and hoping that if Romney is their nominee that there will be much more spotlight on this issue.

  26. 26.

    Linda Featheringill

    March 4, 2012 at 9:29 am

    The real issue, of course, is agency, the ability/power/right to make decisions for yourself.

    In this case, it’s about agency for women and their partners, people who aren’t rich and aren’t powerful, wanting to make decisions based on what they think is best for them.

    Women who claim the right of agency for themselves are often called sluts or something like that. I suspect they used to be called witches. Men who find themselves outside of the dominant group are often called names when they try to do things their way. [I’m not as familiar with these names.]

    But the real issue is whether everyone has the right to make these decisions regarding their own lives.

  27. 27.

    Arm The Homeless

    March 4, 2012 at 9:33 am

    Here is my pop-psychology take: After Breitbart throws a rod, the ‘activists’ within the RW felt uneasy that there was a hole blown in the fabric of their world-view. He is a God that bleeds.

    When Rush was backed into a corner after hours and hours of the MSM shining light on his words, the RW had a knee-jerk reaction to rally-round their boy-king for fear that they might lose even more rhetorical ammo.

    I have noticed the more militant tone since Breitbart’s passing. I really believe that if they can’t shift this narrative this week that they are going to end up with a ni*clang* from one of the less hinged mouth-breathers, and a not so insignificant ‘rally-round-that-loser’ reaction from the peanut-gallery.

    Needless to say, it’s a good time to be a popcorn farmer

  28. 28.

    JGabriel

    March 4, 2012 at 9:35 am

    chopper:

    as much as modo is a moron …

    There are lots of things you can call MoDo — shallow, with regressive gender politics, for instance — but “moron” isn’t really one of then.

    .

  29. 29.

    cermet

    March 4, 2012 at 9:36 am

    @chopper: Not sure what world you live in but in the real world, we don’t worry about fake slippery slope arguments about critical health care issues relating to grave risk’s to the lives of woman. Last time I checked, sex was a critical health related care issue that should 100% be considered and just that issue alone is critical to the health of countless woman. Maybe your point would be better about the wasted money on viagra since it has zero heath specific uses. Oh, sorry, only woman’s health issues that have sex involved are in dangerous waters and we need to be ‘careful’ about our arguments. Yeah, right.

  30. 30.

    lamh35

    March 4, 2012 at 9:38 am

    So how much of my tax dollars is going towards Viagra? Isn’t the almost sole purpose of ED drugs to be able to have sex…yeah mainly for pleasure? Especially since nowadays you don’t need to have sex to have children. So V’gra apart of this conversation about having to pay for men to be able to have a lot of sex

  31. 31.

    cermet

    March 4, 2012 at 9:40 am

    Moderation?

  32. 32.

    Linda Featheringill

    March 4, 2012 at 9:42 am

    https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/keep-united-states-out-war-iran-we-need-investment-home-not-another-dumb-war-abroad/CMj5YWcm

    While you’re on whitehouse dot gov to petition against Rush, take a look at the please-don’t-go-to-war-with-Iran petition.

  33. 33.

    JPL

    March 4, 2012 at 9:43 am

    Tomorrow Rush will apologize and say why are we talking about sex when unemployment is so high. He’ll then go on his commun.ist, fasc.ist, marx.ist rant declaring that the President not only wants your guns but wants to stifle free speech.

  34. 34.

    RedKitten

    March 4, 2012 at 9:44 am

    @JGabriel: THAT’S what I would like to see. It alarms the hell out of me that Faux News and Rush Limbaugh are spoon-fed ’round the clock to the troops. Some of these individuals will eventually become political advisers, or Secretaries of Defense, and then what?

  35. 35.

    Arm The Homeless

    March 4, 2012 at 9:47 am

    @cermet: I concede the intent of your point, but to be fair, there is at least one off-label use for ‘little blue pill’–and the orange one too–with regards to a certain type of hypertension. FYI

    EDIT: @JPL: DING! DING! I have absorbed enough of that idiots BS living in the South, this will be the M.O. and the tune will go on without skipping a beat. He knows he lost some face, but he can’t looked cowed. It’s all PR and damage control this week.

  36. 36.

    kerFuFFler

    March 4, 2012 at 9:49 am

    Rush’s apology sure was lame. It reminds me of a time when one of my son’s classmates tried to exclude him from a game at recess on the grounds that my son was Jewish. The child was instructed to write a note of apology to my son, and boy were we surprised that it read, “Dear Matthew, I’m sorry I called you a Jew.”

  37. 37.

    Chris

    March 4, 2012 at 9:50 am

    @lonesomerobot:

    Well? Dude’s in the 4th year of his presidency. Any plan to destroy America by the man who pals around with terrorists would have to be enacted a bit more efficiently than that, wouldn’t it? Or do you slow-walk the whole despotic tyranny thing until you barely win reelection? It just doesn’t seem to be playing out like they all hoped… er, I mean feared. Either that or Bill Ayers must be some kind of super-genius.

    Oh, the teabaggers stopped him. Dude. He totally WOULD have, but the teabaggers stood up and made him afraid. Yeah.

  38. 38.

    BO_Bill

    March 4, 2012 at 9:51 am

    Perhaps people should just buy condoms, thereby keeping the government out of women’s uteruses.

  39. 39.

    jayackroyd

    March 4, 2012 at 9:56 am

    Zunguzungu has an interesting comment wrt:

    Obama’s call had to be a tipping point, and it was a pitch perfect way to criticize Rush

    http://bit.ly/wRd3Ek

  40. 40.

    Zifnab25

    March 4, 2012 at 9:58 am

    @JPL:

    He’ll then go on his commun.ist, fasc.ist, marx.ist rant declaring that the President not only wants your guns but wants to stifle free speech.

    But none of that involves sex, so the cable news harpies aren’t going to give a shit. Rush doesn’t gently guide the debate, he goes off like a bag full of TNT and leaves the Party leadership to clean up his mess. He’ll run off into a week-long self-pity parade, and fade into the background until a new hot button comes along and he blows up again. Only the people who actually listen to Rush are going to follow what he says next, unless CNN/MSNBC/FOX give it a full day of coverage.

  41. 41.

    JPL

    March 4, 2012 at 9:58 am

    @BO_Bill: Perhaps the government should just cut it off when certain males reach puberty.

  42. 42.

    BO_Bill

    March 4, 2012 at 10:06 am

    Yours does not represent the civilized discourse that mistermix is trying to impose upon our collective JPL.

  43. 43.

    Villago Delenda Est

    March 4, 2012 at 10:07 am

    @Arm The Homeless:

    I really believe that if they can’t shift this narrative this week that they are going to end up with a ni*clang* from one of the less hinged mouth-breathers, and a not so insignificant ‘rally-round-that-loser’ reaction from the peanut-gallery.

    It’s going to come to this, before November.

    They’re going to use that word and specifically aim it at the President, the First Lady, or the girls.

    It’s coming to that. They are unhinged, they are desperate, and they are drowning.

  44. 44.

    forked tongue

    March 4, 2012 at 10:13 am

    @BO_Bill: Perhaps the government should just stay the hell out of women’s uteruses, thereby keeping the government out of women’s uteruses.

    And now it’s the pie filter for you, Nardwipe.

  45. 45.

    scav

    March 4, 2012 at 10:15 am

    BoB, Its contributions never enhance the rational component of any conversation, civilized or not, that he wanders through like a disconnected bad small.

  46. 46.

    Villago Delenda Est

    March 4, 2012 at 10:21 am

    The sooner BO_B goes the way of Breitbart, the better.

  47. 47.

    BO_Bill

    March 4, 2012 at 10:24 am

    As a big fan of women’s uteruses, I fully support keeping the government out of women’s uteruses, as the last thing I want to think about when I am enjoying women’s uteruses, is Barack Obama. However, there are some potential health benefits, to those men who society might define as having ‘premature tendencies’.

    In the past, these challenged men could think about old females defecating, as a means to prolong the sexual experience for them and their special someone. Now, with government-sponsored uteruses, they can simply think of Michelle Obama eating French fries.

    This is truly progress with regards to the overall health of American society. And it is all about health.

  48. 48.

    Arm The Homeless

    March 4, 2012 at 10:25 am

    OT, but funny: Could our own special little troll be two-timing on us? It would be irresponsible not to speculate

    Veritas says:
    March 3, 2012 at 11:14 pm
    …
    Bert makes Mooochelle look almost like a female gorrilla.

    Warning: Den of rabid, racist fucks

  49. 49.

    cermet

    March 4, 2012 at 10:25 am

    @BO_Bill: Last I checked, it wasn’t the Gov but thug politician’s and the boy raping or full time protectors of the rapist called catholic bishops that demanded control of woman’s uteruses. Try reading instead of writing posts like that steaming pile of lie’s – then add your thoughts.

  50. 50.

    mistermix

    March 4, 2012 at 10:29 am

    @BO_Bill: Enjoying a woman’s *uterus* Bill? Clearly, any discussion of sex with a woman is a completely theoretical exercise for you.

  51. 51.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    March 4, 2012 at 10:30 am

    @jayackroyd:
    I especially liked this quote:

    This, after all, is why “privilege” is so importantly different from power or bigotry: privilege must remain ignorant of itself, because it’s the right to enjoy benefits which you aren’t even aware that others get denied.

    Though I will say, until last month, why would Obama have needed to mention women’s reproductive health in the state of the union? All he did was end the need for a copay; the Republicans and religious leaders used that as an opportunity to once again attack general health coverage.

    I think, once again, when your enemies are injuring themselves, you stay out of their way. Otherwise, that was a great article.

  52. 52.

    Anya

    March 4, 2012 at 10:31 am

    @jayackroyd:

    For while the president might have reached out to Fluke, what has he done for the nameless friend that Sandra Fluke was actually advocating for, or for the many women whose health is actually at risk?

    Are you fucking kidding me! By any chance was Zunguzungu hiding in a cave the past few months? Didn’t this whole “debate” start because of a hearing designed to undermine President Barack Obama’s decision to guarantee women’s free access to contraception health care regardless of their workplace.

    Is Zunguzungu aware that the Affordable Care Act requires insurance companies to cover contraceptives, which the Obama administration ruled that religious institutions are not exempt?

    Also, this is what the President said about women’s access to health care:

    No woman’s health should depend on who she is or where she works or how much money she makes.

  53. 53.

    forked tongue

    March 4, 2012 at 10:35 am

    @mistermix: Did he say he was “enjoying a woman’s uterus”? I know his ilk like to say anything they think will piss liberals off, but self-identifying as a cannibal? If this is the next step for wingnuts, I’m all for it!

  54. 54.

    Svensker

    March 4, 2012 at 10:36 am

    @Arm The Homeless:

    Oy.

    I don’t even want to know how you found that.

  55. 55.

    Betty Cracker

    March 4, 2012 at 10:38 am

    @Anya: Thank you. I thought that was an extraordinarily dumb argument too.

  56. 56.

    Arm The Homeless

    March 4, 2012 at 10:42 am

    @Svensker: The Breitbart continuum leads one to a lot of unsavory places.

  57. 57.

    Persia

    March 4, 2012 at 10:46 am

    @Arm The Homeless: My dad has pulmonary hypertension, the one non-sexual reason for (the blue pill that just landed me in moderation). Getting his prescription refilled is an exercise in embarrassment for him because the disorder is so rare and little-known. I’d guess far, far more women use birth control pills for non-birth control uses than people use the blue pill for anything but erections.

  58. 58.

    Mnemosyne

    March 4, 2012 at 10:49 am

    @Anya:

    This is where ODS leads people, “Oh, sure, she was testifying in front of Congress because the Obama administration made new rules that require all health plans to cover contraception for free as preventative care, but what has Obama done to make contraception more accessible?”

  59. 59.

    GregB

    March 4, 2012 at 10:56 am

    Limbaugh has never apologized as far as I can recall.

    He showed weakness and the rubes were running behind him ready to go off the cliff and he stepped aside and let them plunge off when he groveled with his half assed apology.

    He’ll be off the radio in less than a year.

  60. 60.

    Jennifer

    March 4, 2012 at 10:58 am

    Agree that we shouldn’t cede ground by buying into the “birth control has other uses too” frame.

    What we should be doing is pointing out, at every turn, that since WE pay for our health coverage, then our employers, Rush Limbaugh, Catholic bishops, etc. should have NO FUCKING SAY in whether or not it covers contraception. Insurance coverage is a part of what people get paid by their employers (sometimes; there are employers who offer group plans and don’t pick up any of the tab). However much the employer is paying in for that insurance, it’s the employee’s money. Your employer doesn’t get to dictate how you spend your money on anything ELSE, why should health coverage be different, particularly when they are going to FORCE you to pay for something that doesn’t really meet your needs? They aren’t allowed to dictate the kind of car you can buy, the food you can buy, the home you can buy…this is no different.

    Some kind of a slogan might be helpful, such as “In America, you have the freedom to pay for the health coverage your employer thinks you should have, whether it’s what you need or not.”

    They want to make this all about “infringement of rights?” Fine, let’s talk about the real rights that are being infringed – OUR rights to not have to spend our money that we’ve earned on something that doesn’t work for us.

    I’d like to see some ads targeted at married couples too – letting them know that Republicans, who screech about “freedom” and “government interferene” think that they should be in charge, so they can control citizens’ sex lives and family size. Another good place for a slogan, something like “Republicans like to talk about smaller and less intrusive government, but their idea of “smaller and less intrusive” is a government in which they decide how many children you should have. Under Republican leadership, you have the freedom of celibacy or more children than you want or can afford.”

    It just maddens me that every fucking time they go off the rails, everyone chases the shiny object instead of just saying, “they’re lying again, here’s the facts, and now they need to sit down and shut the fuck up.”

  61. 61.

    El Cid

    March 4, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @Jennifer: I think there’s a part of the argument when it’s pointed out their ignoring of the non-sexual medical uses of ‘the pill’ for women that indicates how an obsession with moralizing on sexuality has become demonstrably fanatical. It’s a measure of unhingedness that draws the attention of people who ordinarily might not pay much attention to or come to much of a judgment about routine right wing venomous anti-woman moralizing — a ‘you people really have gone nuts’ level.

  62. 62.

    merrinc

    March 4, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @JGabriel:

    Maureen Dowd may not be a moron but she certainly isn’t as clever as SHE thinks she is. She’s as much a drag on public discourse as the wingnuts. I have fantasies of her and Ann Coulter being locked up in the same padded room – forever.

  63. 63.

    Odie Hugh Manatee

    March 4, 2012 at 11:14 am

    @Southern Beale:

    Maybe it has something to do with the fact that libruls are tech nuts and maybe some use Carbonite while wingers can barely figure out how to plug their computers into a wall socket. I’m glad that El Lardo is losing advertisers. I hope he keeps it up and loses all of them.

    That would put him solidly on winger welfare.

    Damn, the right is just falling apart before our very eyes. What a horrifically beautiful nightmare to behold.

  64. 64.

    Persia

    March 4, 2012 at 11:20 am

    @Belafon (formerly anonevent): Yeah, the problem is that the general discourse has moved so far right in terms of women’s autonomy that people on the right chose to interpret the President’s act as a radical act.

  65. 65.

    DanielX

    March 4, 2012 at 11:21 am

    Maureen Dowd’s column title:

    Have You No Shame, Rush?

    No.

    This has been another edition of Simple Answers to Simple Questions.

  66. 66.

    Shalimar

    March 4, 2012 at 11:23 am

    @Frank: In theory, Mormons are only supposed to baptize those who didn’t have a chance to consider becoming Mormons during their lives. Obviously, that isn’t the way it works in practice most of the time.

  67. 67.

    kerFuFFler

    March 4, 2012 at 11:26 am

    I sure hope Fluke hits Rush with a defamation suit. Come to think of it shouldn’t it be a class action suit since he just called most women sluts?

  68. 68.

    Marcellus Shale, Public Dick

    March 4, 2012 at 11:38 am

    lets not fuck the football here.

    birth control is health care.

  69. 69.

    g

    March 4, 2012 at 11:44 am

    Fluke’s testimony, as John pointed out, was all about the use of the pill for ovarian cysts. It didn’t matter, she was still called a slut,

    It must also be pointed out that her testimony wasn’t about her own use, other than in the most broad and general terms. It was about other women. Even so, that didn’t stop them from calling her, personally, a slut.

    It shows you what these people are like.

  70. 70.

    lamh35

    March 4, 2012 at 11:45 am

    Thank you David Axelrod for finally putting this out there!

    Obama aide: Limbaugh made ‘sort of quasi-apology’

    …President Obama’s top political aide said this morning that Limbaugh made only a “quasi-apology” to the law student he called a “slut,” and that his initial comments were “predicated on a lie.”

    “The lie was that somehow she was asking that taxpayers pay for contraception,” Axelrod said on ABC’s This Week. “The policy is that in basic insurance policies, contraception — contraceptive services, birth control, should be included.”

    Axelrod added, “Even in his sort of quasi-apology last night, Mr. Limbaugh continued that falsehood, and it needs to be challenged.”…

  71. 71.

    mistermix

    March 4, 2012 at 11:47 am

    @jayackroyd: That post is a great illustration of how someone can grasp the subtleties of an ideological point and completely misunderstand the subtleties of politics. Calling Fluke was a deft political act – he was able to show (not tell) that Limbaugh was a bully by consoling the bully’s target without getting in a pissing match with a skunk like Rush.

  72. 72.

    g

    March 4, 2012 at 11:49 am

    @BO_Bill: False equivalency.

    You don’t know how oral contraception works, do you?

  73. 73.

    Frank

    March 4, 2012 at 11:53 am

    @Shalimar:

    Yes, I am aware of that. I just don’t understand why they don’t respect the choice made by non-Mormon before they died.

    How would the Mormon leaders feel if other religions started to baptize dead Mormons to other religions?

  74. 74.

    bemused

    March 4, 2012 at 11:53 am

    Rightwingers not understanding how the birth control pill works is the best argument that comprehensive sex education should be required in every junior and senior high school.

  75. 75.

    WereBear (itouch)

    March 4, 2012 at 11:56 am

    @kerFuFFler:

    Come to think of it shouldn’t it be a class action suit since he just called most women sluts?

    Sign me up! Seriously. We have a theoretical 65% of the female population who would sign up too.

    Limbaugh has given us plenty of evidence.

  76. 76.

    Jay in Oregon

    March 4, 2012 at 11:57 am

    @Southern Beale:
    I know Quicken Loans does as well. I’ve also heard Hartmann and others do ads for gold traders.

    They probably just do block media buys (“Get me $300,000 worth of ads on talk radio stations in these markets”). It probably gets even more confusing when you have liberal and wingnut talk shows on the same stations.

  77. 77.

    kc

    March 4, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    I need to find out what Carbonite makes, so I can buy some …

  78. 78.

    lol

    March 4, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    @mistermix:

    A white guy progressive blogger with a grasp of policy but not grasp of politics? No wai!

  79. 79.

    Suffern ACE

    March 4, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Its not just conservative men that don’t pay attention when women are speaking.

  80. 80.

    mapaghimagsik

    March 4, 2012 at 12:20 pm

    Carbonite is a good product (offsite backup for your computer, so if your hard drive dies, your critical files are backed up ) and they have good technical support. I would bet that talk radio is a relatively cheap advertising expenditure, but you have to go for the guys that have lots of listeners.

    I was worried, to be honest. I like Carbonite as a product and didn’t get the chance to jump in and say “I love you guys, but really? You’re paying to be tied to this crap?” I’m really glad I didn’t have to, but will congratulate them just the same.

    I like Marcott’s writing and take no prisoners attitude regarding women, women’s health, and women’s sexuality. It might not always be good politics, but I’m sick to death of delicate centrists stupidly ratfucking us to the dark ages.

  81. 81.

    Karen

    March 4, 2012 at 12:24 pm

    1. Because I had a blood clot that gave me DVT eleven years ago, I can’t take birth control (hormones) for it but yes, I can tell you from personal experience that it’s used for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome or PCOS. And it’s not an off label reason. The reason why it’s used is not to get rid of the cysts directly but to stop the cause: overproduction of testosterone. Symptoms also include overproduction of facial hair and male pattern baldness and obesity. The cysts can be small or they can be so big and painful that they need to be drained. And they grow back. One thing they have you do when you’re diagnosed is to give you insulin regulating drugs as well because it’s been found that metabolic syndrome and even diabetes can cause PCOS. Sorry for the medical lesson but I thought that if people are talking about PCOS, at least they should know what it is.

    2. As for the theory that by including that PCOS reason for contraception, that only feeds into the female sexuality should be shameful idea, I don’t agree there.

    By including a medical reason for why it’s used, Fluke was able to show how unreasonable the right wing is being. And by President Obama calling her, it suddenly shows the non insane Americans that it’s not just about shaming female sexuality. The right wing and Rushbo are shaming WOMEN themselves. It’s gone past sexuality. They want women to be ashamed to be women!

  82. 82.

    West of the Rockies (formerly Frank W.)

    March 4, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    I hope this pains Limbaugh, truly, I do. I hope it causes him to get cranky and irritable so that he has a shitty day. I hope he gets dirty looks even from the women who work with him on a daily basis. I hope it causes him to worry that he might actually lose a dollar or a million from his huge stash (because enough is never enough for people like him). I hope it hurts, stings, and pisses him off. F.U. Limbaugh….

  83. 83.

    ericblair

    March 4, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    @Frank:

    How would the Mormon leaders feel if other religions started to baptize dead Mormons to other religions?

    Of course they’d feel that it would be blasphemous and a sin against the dead. But, don’t you see, the Mormons are Right and the other religions are Wrong, so it’s OK for the Mormons to do it. QED. The problem with these fairness arguments is that the believer in question doesn’t believe that fairness between religions should exist, because for the most part they’re pretty convinced they’re following the real path and everyone else isn’t.

    Agree that we shouldn’t cede ground by buying into the “birth control has other uses too” frame.

    This all depends on who the target of the argument is, doesn’t it? Are you trying to peel off the vacillating conservative women, who have issues with sex but know very well the GOP has gone barking mad about this? Or are you trying to validate the views of Dem women who do believe that people’s sexual activity is no goddamn business of the government at all? I’m firmly in the latter camp, but we need to peel off the waverers right now. As long as we’re not dumping on people who are (gasp) sexually active, it’s not a terrible thing to focus on another framing of the issue.

    Funny how all that talk about “not having government bureaucrats between a person and their doctor” goes out the window as soon as sex is involved.

  84. 84.

    Maude

    March 4, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Rush doesn’t belong on the public airwaves.

  85. 85.

    Joey Maloney

    March 4, 2012 at 12:38 pm

    @Villago Delenda Est:

    They’re going to use that word and specifically aim it at the President, the First Lady, or the girls.
    __
    It’s coming to that. They are unhinged, they are desperate, and they are drowning.

    I just hope they can restrain themselves. Until, say, towards the end of the third week in October.

  86. 86.

    chopper

    March 4, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    @cermet:

    I think you missed my point entirely.

  87. 87.

    chopper

    March 4, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    @Marcellus Shale, Public Dick:

    exactly. trying to make the argument about the off-label uses that might go over better with some crowd is missing the point. every use of the pill is for a legitimate medical reason.

  88. 88.

    aimai

    March 4, 2012 at 1:20 pm

    @ericblair:
    It goes out the window when women are involved. Not male sexual activity unless its homosexual activity. This has always been the case. The puritans monitored male and female sexuality in order to prevent both sex outside of marriage and the birth of bastard children. Subsequent to that period unlawful female sexual activity (activity outside of marriage) was monitored and controlled in order to protect legitimacy (men’s rights to own their own progeny) and to prevent the rise of an unawanted illegitimate population.
    Even where the government isn’t–the government has always been. The very assertion that there could be no “rape within marriage” is a form of government control over female sexuality since the government was refusing to submit male marital privilige to outside law and control.

    Not to get all technical here but the patriarchal household economy with one head (male) existed within a nexus of rights held by men in general over both unmarried women and married women. Where the government refuses to step in there’s the same power vacuum that you see in failed states with the rise of the Mafia. The power of the head of household is unchecked.

    Birth control that women can access without getting permission from their husbands, fathers, lovers, is a huge deal in breaking the control of men over women. In this case, really for almost the first time historically, the government is on the side of women. Sociologically speaking this is like the brief period of reconstruction when the US government stopped enforcing slavery and started enforcing equality.

    aimai

  89. 89.

    wrb

    March 4, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    The scorecard on his advertisers is brutal. He’s lost six, including Carbonite backup, who dropped him last night after his lame apology

    I have trouble believing that if his listenership doesn’t decline, that his ad rates will, which is what will matter.

    Read the comments of his fans- they are loving this. Casual listeners are probably not missing a broadcast due to the excitement.

    The advertisers will return as soon as the outrage turns elsewhere.

  90. 90.

    wrb

    March 4, 2012 at 1:25 pm

    @Arm The Homeless:

    I really believe that if they can’t shift this narrative this week that they are going to end up with a ni*clang* from one of the less hinged mouth-breathers,

    The N word is really worse that the likes of “Moochelle” and “prostitute”?

    I guess it is for some, I just never understood its specialness.

  91. 91.

    Arm The Homeless

    March 4, 2012 at 1:58 pm

    @wrb: It’s a bright line that culture and media can point to as incapable of being given the benefit of the doubt. Trying to argue ‘intent’ allows them to easily sidetrack the narrative.

  92. 92.

    Mark K

    March 4, 2012 at 2:05 pm

    SIGN THE PETITION!!!

    Dammit, liberals are so fucking lazy. Just went and signed it and only 700 so far. Come on man! How tough is following a link? Geez!

    whitehouse.gov

  93. 93.

    Billy Beane

    March 4, 2012 at 2:17 pm

    mistermix sounds like a 10yo trying to give their parents marital advice. You are just embarrassing yourself mm.

  94. 94.

    Chris Grrr™

    March 4, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    @Karen: Thanks. I’m glad for the “lesson”, and for this thread. More ammo…

  95. 95.

    jefft452

    March 4, 2012 at 2:34 pm

    “Every time you say this, a right winger wanting to imply that women who have sex for pleasure are sluts gets his wings. This statement and all variations on it feeds into the right wing claim that a) contraception is not health care and b) that women who have sex for pleasure are so indefensible that you have to lean on off-label uses for a contraceptive drug to justify its existence”

    Normally I would agree with Marcotte, but I think there has been a shift in public opinion so this dosent work that way anymore

    I compare this debate to public opinion in the north prior to the civil war
    Most people were not diehard abolitionists, and John Brown was a dirty hippie at best and a terrorist at worst, … but bleeding Kansas got blamed on the south, not “on both sides”
    The people in Kansas just wanted statehood, we could have just given it to them, but no, we had to have a long drawn out debate leading to yet another “compromise” with a rube-goldberg plebiscite conducted during a terror campaign and bloody reprisals … all because the south just couldn’t allow us to do anything unless the pro-slavery cause was our first priority

    Non contraception uses of the pills work the same way, even people who don’t care about slut shaming start to get pissed when the wingers are willing to let others suffer from ovarian cysts just to advance the cause of slut shaming

  96. 96.

    David Koch

    March 4, 2012 at 3:46 pm

    @Mark K: This.

  97. 97.

    Stranger Reader

    March 4, 2012 at 4:50 pm

    I agree with Marcotte. The rhetorical framing that many are choosing here concedes to the slut-shamers; it’s losing the war to win the battle. And women using birth control as birth control vastly outnumber those using it for other medical conditions, so better messaging could make this an even more personal issue for a lot more women. Who cares whether Rush is mischaracterizing Fluke’s testimony? The way he has chosen to misrepresent it is actually more broadly offensive and therefore presents an even greater political opportunity.

  98. 98.

    asiangrrlMN

    March 4, 2012 at 6:26 pm

    @Stranger Reader: I agree, too. I think it should be pointed out that Limbaugh lied about Fluke’s testimony, but it also needs to be said that if she were talking about herself and contraception affordability, Limbaugh still would have been wrong. A healthy sexuality is part of overall health and should be covered under healthcare, full stop. It’s frustrating that the issue of a woman’s sexuality is so toxic that any ‘admission’ a woman is having non-marital sex and enjoying herself thoroughly is a liability for our side.

  99. 99.

    Lex

    March 5, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    Regarding Carbonite: If it’s still up, read the original statement from the CEO, which was all “well, talk radio in general is contentious” and “you know, conservatives dislike NPR, too,” and “Maybe Rush and I should sit down and talk this out.”

    I’d like to think that the reason he mentioned his two daughters in the second, more forceful statement that everyone is so happy with is that his daughters read the first one and junkpunched him.

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. Balloon Juice » Rush: Still Losing - My Health Understanding says:
    March 8, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    […] here to see the original: Balloon Juice » Rush: Still Losing Filed Under: Women's Health Tagged With: bill, bluff, chump, cough, exemption, larger, make, […]

Primary Sidebar

Fundraising 2023-24

Wis*Dems Supreme Court + SD-8

Recent Comments

  • Elizabelle on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 5:34pm)
  • Elizabelle on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 5:31pm)
  • NotMax on Twenty Years Gone (Mar 20, 2023 @ 5:31pm)
  • WaterGirl on Open Thread: TANSTAAFL! — It’s The Latest GOP Zombie Fad (Mar 20, 2023 @ 5:30pm)
  • trollhattan on Monday Afternoon Open Thread (Mar 20, 2023 @ 5:30pm)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Classified Documents: A Primer
State & Local Elections Discussion

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Twitter / Spoutible

Balloon Juice (Spoutible)
WaterGirl (Spoutible)
TaMara (Spoutible)
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
ActualCitizensUnited

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!