• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

The low info voters probably won’t even notice or remember by their next lap around the goldfish bowl.

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

It’s all just conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership.

Good lord, these people are nuts.

In my day, never was longer.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

Republicans: The threats are dire, but my tickets are non-refundable!

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Anyone who bans teaching American history has no right to shape America’s future.

Since we are repeating ourselves, let me just say fuck that.

We will not go quietly into the night; we will not vanish without a fight.

President Musk and Trump are both poorly raised, coddled 8 year old boys.

Russian mouthpiece, go fuck yourself.

Whoever he was, that guy was nuts.

Putin must be throwing ketchup at the walls.

Dear elected officials: Trump is temporary, dishonor is forever.

Innocent people do not delay justice.

… pundit janitors mopping up after the gop

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

The republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

No offense, but this thread hasn’t been about you for quite a while.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Open Threads / Excellent Links / Being Biden

Being Biden

by @heymistermix.com|  March 15, 201310:02 am| 115 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links

FacebookTweetEmail

I would wager that this new feature on the White House site, which is going to have a few minutes of Joe Biden telling the story behind the stuff he did that week, is going to be pretty damn interesting if they let Biden go off script.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Enemies of the Internet
Next Post: My Child is a Homosexual Honor Student »

Reader Interactions

115Comments

  1. 1.

    Cluttered Mind

    March 15, 2013 at 10:06 am

    I wasn’t aware it was possible to prohibit Joe Biden from going off script. It’s why I like him, you never have to worry that he’s BSing you, the man always says what he believes.

  2. 2.

    comrade scott's agenda of rage

    March 15, 2013 at 10:18 am

    Even when Biden’s “on script”, he’s off.

    Love the guy.

  3. 3.

    TaMara (BHF)

    March 15, 2013 at 10:18 am

    Ahem: Being Biden

    Just a day late there <3

  4. 4.

    Roger Moore

    March 15, 2013 at 10:22 am

    @Cluttered Mind:

    I wasn’t aware it was possible to prohibit Joe Biden from going off script

    Maybe you can’t stop him, but you can edit those parts out before they make it to publication.

  5. 5.

    dmsilev

    March 15, 2013 at 10:25 am

    Please, please, please tell me this is being narrated by Onion Joe Biden.

  6. 6.

    NotMax

    March 15, 2013 at 10:25 am

    @Cluttered Mind

    the man always says what he believes

    Even when he’s plagiarizing others’ words.

  7. 7.

    Zifnab

    March 15, 2013 at 10:27 am

    @Roger Moore: Pff. Only if you don’t want to have any fun.

    “So I took the Prime Minster down to Randy Andy’s for shots. That man tells the greatest fart jokes. What? Yes, I’m fully aware the camera is still on.”

  8. 8.

    Lee

    March 15, 2013 at 10:33 am

    Prominent Republican switches stance on gay marriage when son comes out

    This is my surprised face

    /sarcasm off

  9. 9.

    Cacti

    March 15, 2013 at 10:35 am

    O/T

    The Vatican is starting the whitewash push back campaign against the allegations that the new 80-year old virgin was in cahoots with the Argentine Junta.

    “No credible accusation has ever stuck,” and the “anti-clerical left wing” is out to get Frankie.

    The denials have an awfully familiar ring to them.

  10. 10.

    Roger Moore

    March 15, 2013 at 10:38 am

    @Lee:

    Prominent Republican switches stance on gay marriage when son comes out

    It’s all over but the shouting. The haters are just delaying the inevitable now.

  11. 11.

    Violet

    March 15, 2013 at 10:49 am

    @Lee: Lack of empathy is the defining characteristic of Republicans. Until and unless something affects them personally, they will not change their minds about something. Gay son or daughter? Gay marriage for everyone!

    I cannot express the loathing I have for these people. It’s All.About.Them.All.The.Time. Zero empathy.

  12. 12.

    lol

    March 15, 2013 at 10:50 am

    @Lee:

    Reminds me of that Republican congressman who came out for prison reform… after he spent a couple years in prison. It’s always “What’s in it for me?” with these people. Utterly incapable of empathy.

  13. 13.

    gene108

    March 15, 2013 at 10:52 am

    @Lee:

    I want to punch Portman in the nuts for switching.

    He’s all happy and content to dick over other people’s happiness, but when the shit hit home (his son comes out of the closet), he decides his happy home can’t be screwed up he changes his mind.

    This all about the Portmans and their domestic bliss.

    He’s still an uncaring jack-ass on damn near everything that doesn’t personally affect him, like all other conservatives.

  14. 14.

    Mnemosyne

    March 15, 2013 at 11:02 am

    @gene108:

    He’s still an uncaring jack-ass on damn near everything that doesn’t personally affect him, like all other conservatives.

    That’s the thing that bugs me when most conservatives do something like this — they change their mind about the one thing that personally affects them, but cling stubbornly to all of their other beliefs.

    I don’t mind if something like this becomes a watershed that makes someone question all of their conservative beliefs (like Schiavo was for Cole or Pam Geller was for Charles Johnson), but if it’s just the one change, it’s annoying as hell.

  15. 15.

    Suffern ACE

    March 15, 2013 at 11:02 am

    @Lee: Sent the boy to Yale and look what happens.

  16. 16.

    Roger Moore

    March 15, 2013 at 11:04 am

    @Violet:
    Sure, but compare Portman’s position with Dick Cheney’s. Portman sounds as if he’s actually coming out in favor of marriage equality, while Cheney hasn’t managed to move beyond making it a state issue. I don’t think that necessarily says anything about Portman vs. Cheney, but I do think it shows how fast the issue is moving.

  17. 17.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    March 15, 2013 at 11:07 am

    @Roger Moore:
    @gene108:
    The real difference between Portman and most of the US population is his position as Congressman. Most people don’t change their positions on something like this until their beliefs are challenged.

    This is why the really radical Republicans have fought against gays coming out and minorities and women being in positions of power. When people start accepting it, then the idea that you vote for someone just because he’s white and male goes out the window.

  18. 18.

    Waynski

    March 15, 2013 at 11:08 am

    OT – But didn’t anyone else see David f*cking Remnick on Morning Fuck the Poor agreeing with Joe Scar on Grand Bargain Granny Starving entitlement earned benefit cuts? Really? The editor of The New Yorker kissing Joe Scars ass? Really? I’m cancelling our subscription.

  19. 19.

    Violet

    March 15, 2013 at 11:09 am

    @Roger Moore: I agree the issue is moving fairly quickly. But show me the staunch conservative Republican who changes his mind on gay marriage without having a family member who is gay. Especially a child who comes out as gay.

    I’m glad wingnut representatives are recognizing that everyone deserves the right to marry, so I’m not upset that things are moving forward. But their lack of empathy on every fucking thing is not only infuriating, it’s incredibly destructive. Just once, can’t one of them change their minds just because it’s the right thing to do? No, because then they wouldn’t be a Republican.

  20. 20.

    Chris

    March 15, 2013 at 11:21 am

    @Violet:

    Oh, I think there’s plenty of Staunch Conservative Republicans who have never and will never changed their minds even with a family member coming out. What’s the approval ratings for gay marriage? Most of the 27%ers are still firmly embedded in homophobic territory.

  21. 21.

    Roger Moore

    March 15, 2013 at 11:24 am

    @Violet:
    I recognize that lack of empathy is one of the defining characteristics of conservatives; if they don’t know somebody who’s affected by a problem, they just don’t care about it. OTOH, I think this points out a way forward on a lot of social issues like marriage equality: we have to make sure that the issue is personally relevant to as many conservatives as possible. I fully expect that enough conservatives will eventually have a relative or close friend who’s gay and wants to get married to undermine opposition to marriage equality. And I expect that Loving v. Virginia will be the long-term death of racism, since just about everyone will have relatives who are multi-racial. We just need to figure out how to create that kind of widespread awareness of other social (and hopefully economic) issues.

  22. 22.

    TriassicSands

    March 15, 2013 at 11:25 am

    How do I set up a foolproof block on the Biden Show at the White House? I want to make sure I’m never inadvertently exposed to Joe Biden telling us what he “literally” did this past week.

  23. 23.

    Amir Khalid

    March 15, 2013 at 11:26 am

    @Chris:
    Aren’t there Republicans, including those in elected office, who might disown a child who came out rather than change position on gay rights? I suspect there are.

  24. 24.

    lol

    March 15, 2013 at 11:28 am

    @Amir Khalid:

    I think there’s a couple tea party wingnuts in the House who disowned their kids for coming out. I might be confusing them with state level ones though.

  25. 25.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    March 15, 2013 at 11:29 am

    @Amir Khalid: He’s never been elected to anything, but Alan Keyes disowned his gay daughter

  26. 26.

    Violet

    March 15, 2013 at 11:30 am

    @Roger Moore: I’m all for making Republicans poor. Especially the currently rich ones who are now funding most of the GOP SuperPACs. Let them be poor so they can finally empathize with people who need some financial assistance.

  27. 27.

    Hill Dweller

    March 15, 2013 at 11:35 am

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    He’s never been elected to anything, but Alan Keyes disowned his gay daughter

    He beat her to the punch.

  28. 28.

    ruemara

    March 15, 2013 at 11:38 am

    As a guv media person, I can wholeheartedly say you can’t get these guys to stay on script. Besides, Biden is delightful either way. OT, I see the latest controversy on the left is that OFA is fundraising with BO ahead of midterms. Do people want to win elections or are we just going to convince voters with our metaphysical purity?

  29. 29.

    jl

    March 15, 2013 at 11:38 am

    Excuse me, that should be ‘Old Handsome Joe Biden’, IIRC.

    White House Addresses Nation’s Critical Shortage Of Biden

    http://wonkette.com/506378/white-house-addresses-nations-critical-shortage-of-biden

    Need to start a petition at the WH site for Handome Ol’ Joe giving his thoughts on the sexytime intro Dr. Jill gave for him during the campaign.

    And something on muscle cars, cameros, or trans ams, or corvettes, or chevy pickups or whatever the heck jalopy it is that he likes. Especially washing them in the WH driveway.

  30. 30.

    Roger Moore

    March 15, 2013 at 11:41 am

    @Hill Dweller:

    He beat her to the punch.

    Sorry, but when I hear that when talking about a wingnut, I immediately assume that we’re talking about opposition to VAWA.

  31. 31.

    jl

    March 15, 2013 at 11:41 am

    @ruemara:

    ” I see the latest controversy on the left is that OFA is fundraising with BO ahead of midterms. Do people want to win elections or are we just going to convince voters with our metaphysical purity? ”

    Is there a link for that? I am curious about who would complain about fundraising for the midterms. Seems like last chance to improve prospects of good government during Obama administration.

  32. 32.

    greennotGreen

    March 15, 2013 at 11:43 am

    While I agree that in general Republicans are lacking in empathy, I think some of what changes people’s minds about gay issues when someone they know comes out is the realization that members of the demonized group actually aren’t demons. It’s much easier to see a group as weird and other when you don’t know anyone in that group.

    On the other hand, I actually know some Republicans. Most are uninformed and happy, maybe even desperate, to stay that way.

  33. 33.

    Cris (without an H)

    March 15, 2013 at 11:44 am

    I would wager that the Joe Biden video feature is going to be closely followed by wingnuts bobbing for “gaffes.”

  34. 34.

    Maude

    March 15, 2013 at 11:44 am

    McConnell is vowing to repeal Obamacare.

  35. 35.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 11:46 am

    Public opinion on marriage equality has been changing so quickly that some of us, including me, have gotten a little complacent. Here in Illinois, where the marriage equality bill has passed the senate and house exec committee, the Dems hold a 71-47 majority in the house — the last step to getting this law enacted, since Governor Quinn is 100 percent on board. However, we are fighting every day via emails and visits and every night via phonebanking to get to 60 votes so we can nail this thing down. Too many stubborn Democrat reps in conservative (or normally progressive but very fundamentalist Christian) districts are balking. So is the entire Republican caucus, as far as we know. Some may vote for this bill in the end, but they’re not advertising it now.

    It’s so frustrating. I wish a number of gay and lesbian sons, daughters, sisters, brothers, best friends, etc. of these cowardly legislators would come out this weekend. Maybe then we’d get some action.

  36. 36.

    GregB

    March 15, 2013 at 11:46 am

    So the way to a renewed conservative success is for them to become more liberal without admitting it.

    Ratfuckers!

  37. 37.

    cane giallo

    March 15, 2013 at 11:46 am

    Testing wordpress login. I’ve got a wp account but the login on this site says it doesn’t exist. So I’m logged in to WP from their site, not here.

  38. 38.

    jl

    March 15, 2013 at 11:48 am

    Since thread seems to have abandoned Handsome Ol’ Joe, I might as well chime in that I think this will be an interesting developing story: how GOPer Congresscritters will deal with local sequestration cuts.

    Seems important to cover this, since they will be lying about the sequestration law every time they open their mouths, claiming that Obama personally sat there in the Oval Office and cut their specific local goody to spite the local GOPer loon.

    Sequestration NIMBYism Grips GOP
    Brian Beutler
    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/03/sequestration-nimbyism-grips-gop.php

    ” A strange sickness is afflicting congressional Republicans.

    Unwilling to team up with Democrats to replace sequestration with a mix of spending cuts and tax increases, and unable to pass a cuts-only sequestration measure on their own, Republicans’ official position is that they’ve made their peace with enduring, across-the-board spending cuts in perpetuity.

    But now that those cuts are creating real consequences, individual members are experiencing buyer’s remorse. The only problem is, until they change their underlying position on replacing sequestration, the only thing they can do about it is whine.

    Call it sequestration NIMBYism. ”

    Edit: In fact, Obama probably was gaming out how to cut their specific program when he SUGGESTED and PERSONALLY ALL BY HIMSELF PASSED AND SIGNED the sequester law.

  39. 39.

    Davis X. Machina

    March 15, 2013 at 11:50 am

    No! No!. Doesn’t anyone remember anything that happened before 2009.

    The official line is
    that we’re supposed to despise Biden because of his years of faithful service to the FIRE giants of Delaware like MBNA.

  40. 40.

    Raven

    March 15, 2013 at 11:51 am

    GO ILLINI!

  41. 41.

    jl

    March 15, 2013 at 11:54 am

    @Maude:

    ” McConnell is vowing to repeal Obamacare. ”

    I predict these dead enders have about 9 more months.
    The law will work very quickly to get people coverage, and then the dead enders lose big time. I guess they have to hope to throw enough sand in the gears to last through to 2014, but I doubt that will work, unless they are prepared to shut down federal health services programs through defunding, which would seem to involve a lot of blow back.

  42. 42.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 11:56 am

    @Davis X. Machina: Aren’t the constant firebagger whines bad enough without people baiting them into threads in which they’re so far absent?

  43. 43.

    Hill Dweller

    March 15, 2013 at 11:59 am

    @Maude:

    McConnell is vowing to repeal Obamacare.

    That has about as much chance of happening as McConnell growing a chin.

  44. 44.

    Violet

    March 15, 2013 at 12:01 pm

    @jl: I caught a bit of it on yesterday’s Today Show. Saw it from a distance, but heard someone saying “What is the ‘O’ for it OFA? Is it really ‘Obama’?” Faux-troversy for sure.

  45. 45.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    March 15, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    Jim DeMint on MSNBC just now: We can not stand up for limited government if we do not stand up for ‘traditional marriage”. I can understand a lot of right wing talking points– greed, fear, tribalism, willful ignorance in service of tribalism– but I can’t even imagine how this path works even in DeMint’s mind.

    All of which makes me wonder, I haven’t seen Portman say when his kid came out to him, none of my business and I don’t really care, but I wonder if this is why it wasn’t Romney/Portman

    ETA: Just heard, the kid came out to his parents two years ago.

  46. 46.

    jl

    March 15, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    @Violet: I guess if anything can break through the new-pope-alooza and the WH tour catastrophe, that can.

  47. 47.

    Violet

    March 15, 2013 at 12:08 pm

    @greennotGreen: You’re essentially saying the same thing–when they know someone personally who has to deal with whatever the issue is, then they’ll change their mind. It’s easy to demonize blacks, browns, immigrants, gays, women, poor people, etc. until they know someone personally who has to deal with some restrictive law. Maybe their daughter needs a second trimester abortion after amnio shows terrible chromosomal issues and the baby, if born, would suffer. Maybe their son is gay. When it affects them, they’ll change. Otherwise, “those people” are The Other.

  48. 48.

    Maude

    March 15, 2013 at 12:11 pm

    @jl:
    Ryan said this too. Problem is, Obamacare kicks in before 2014 elections.

    @Hill Dweller:
    Or a brain.

  49. 49.

    RobertDSC-iPhone 4

    March 15, 2013 at 12:15 pm

    Perhaps there should be a segment where Biden reminds Obama that there would be no changes to Social Security on their watch.

  50. 50.

    Cassidy

    March 15, 2013 at 12:16 pm

    There better be a damn Camaro and not the sleek and cool 67-69 one, either. No, I want to see a Gen 2 Z28 with racing stripes.

  51. 51.

    Jim, Foolish Literalist

    March 15, 2013 at 12:18 pm

    OT: I have always thought Chris Christie is his own worst enemy:

    Christie, who’s white, told an audience Tuesday that an “African-American female speaker of the Assembly” is blocking a vote on a school voucher bill that would let children in failing districts attend classes elsewhere.

    link to HuffPo

  52. 52.

    Maude

    March 15, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    @RobertDSC-iPhone 4:
    Good point.

    @Cassidy:
    I’ve seen Cameros fishtail in the rain. No thanks. I’ve also seen fire and I’ve seen rain.

  53. 53.

    Maude

    March 15, 2013 at 12:20 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:
    Christie has been fighting with her his entire term. He is saying he isn’t naming names.

  54. 54.

    Jay C

    March 15, 2013 at 12:21 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    I think a reason wingers like DeMint seem to be trying to shoehorn opposition to gay marriage into the “limited government” bucket (tortured enhanced-interrogated logic as it might require) is that if they came out and actually stated the real reasons for their opposition (i.e. something like “faggots are evil sinners and God hates them“), he’d be lumped in with cranks like Fred Phelps and his loony cult of gay-bashers, and lose whatever credibility on the issue he might have. Not that said “reasons” aren’t, disgracefully, all-too-common in our society: it’s a sign of improvement, I suppose, that they are now a fringe position: so that homophobes feel they have to use diversionary “logic” and euphemisms to mask their prejudices…

    Oh, and Joe Biden on the WH site? This is a Big Fncking Deal!!!

  55. 55.

    ruemara

    March 15, 2013 at 12:23 pm

    @jl: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/obama-ofa-access-donations-clinton-lincoln-bedroom

    http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/02/common-cause-obama-shut-down-organizing-for-action

    I see it making the rounds of organizations like the Coffee Party as many “I voted for Obama but it seems like I voted for Romney instead” “I left OFA because they keep telling me to support the President” comments abound. Meanwhile, MoveOn wants me to yell at Eric Holder for saying that when he tries to pursue banks he gets told that they’re such a big part of the economy, it would be harmful to prosecute them.

  56. 56.

    Roger Moore

    March 15, 2013 at 12:24 pm

    @Hill Dweller:

    That has about as much chance of happening as McConnell growing a chin.

    What do you mean? He already has enough that it’s hard to tell where one chin leaves off and the next one starts. Growing another would be as easy for McConnell as being an asshole.

  57. 57.

    Yutsano

    March 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm

    @Maude: One needn’t be literal about it. But yeah, injecting her race was unnecessary, but typical for Governour Harkonnen.

  58. 58.

    WereBear (iTouch)

    March 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm

    @NotMax: that was a trumped up canard and should not be perpetuated. Don’t do the right wing’s work for them!

    As a Biden fan (my Cuppa Joe cup has been taken over by Mr WereBear) I think this is a Marcy idea.

  59. 59.

    WereBear

    March 15, 2013 at 12:27 pm

    I mean marvy! This is why I say iTouch in my name… the stupid autocorrect

  60. 60.

    WereBear

    March 15, 2013 at 12:29 pm

    @Mnemosyne: Agree a million times.

  61. 61.

    gvg

    March 15, 2013 at 12:29 pm

    I’ve thought since Reagan conservatives lack the imagination to pretend they were someone else and walk in their shoes.

    It’s actually progress though, I remember when most people who found out a kid was gay, disowned them even when they were dying of aids. In fact in my nice world I had not even heard or understood the reality of gays until the news showed them dying and family abandoning then. I could not understand that and felt so sad for them. Then I met a few. They didn’t seem any different than anybody else really. I’ve known one for about 25 years, others just a decade or so.

    It’s a lack of imagination as well as empathy. these days most people know someone they care about who is gay.

  62. 62.

    Mnemosyne

    March 15, 2013 at 12:32 pm

    @shortstop:

    I really hope you can get that bill passed by this summer so I can start asking my brother-in-law in Chicago when he’s going to find a nice boy and settle down, because he’s not getting any younger.
    :-)

  63. 63.

    Maude

    March 15, 2013 at 12:32 pm

    @Yutsano:
    You do have a valid point. In NJ, It’s understood what he meant. He’s not PC.
    I like him, but I hope a good Dem runs. I won’t vote for Christie. They’d be scraping poo people off the streets because they’d be flat from starvation.

  64. 64.

    Cassidy

    March 15, 2013 at 12:35 pm

    @Maude: You can’t be wishy washy about the speed. You either pull out slowly or you floor that mofo.

  65. 65.

    Maude

    March 15, 2013 at 12:39 pm

    @Cassidy:
    Road pizza.

  66. 66.

    greennotGreen

    March 15, 2013 at 12:45 pm

    @Violet: I think there’s a subtle difference. Yes, some conservatives will change their minds on gay issues when it’s someone in their families because it affects theirfamilies, but someone may change his mind because Steve, a nice guy at the office, comes out. Steve doesn’t affect the conservative’s family, but c’mon, he’s an okay guy. Don’t be mean to Steve!

  67. 67.

    scav

    March 15, 2013 at 12:45 pm

    Love the detail that another Indian Tribe has signed onto gay marriage. Over and above the issue in itself, the complicating element that Indian Sovereign Rights introduces into GOP SOP States Rights! States Rights! talking points is delicious.

    Rooting for Complications is a cousin to Rooting for Injuries, I will admit. But its also kin to Rooting for Reality.

  68. 68.

    jl

    March 15, 2013 at 12:46 pm

    @ruemara: weak tea BS. I agree getting access due to size of contributions you give or can deliver is bad, but that is the system we have for now.

    Access to Obama for OFA contributions that will go for PR and GOTV for a publicly stated legislative agenda is not the same as private meetings in private back rooms with Harding’s administration poker buddies, Nixon and his gang, or the two Bush presidents.

    I guess Common Cause and a certain type of lefty prefer to unilaterally disarm, then lose, then whine about how awful it all is. That is, they are professional losers.

    Has anyone noticed, BTW, that this is Obama’s second term and he is on his way out in less than four years? I presume he wants to improve Congress so he can get something done in the last two years, and build something for future presidents. OFA is fine with me, if they are open enough about their agenda and I can see a plan and some follow through. If money bigshots get access for that, it is the lesser to two evils, IMHO.

  69. 69.

    Joey Maloney

    March 15, 2013 at 12:47 pm

    @Violet:

    But show me the staunch conservative Republican who changes his mind on gay marriage without having a family member who is gay.

    There’s this guy, the chair of the Illinois Republican party. If he has a gay family member he’s not publicizing it; his position is just that marriage equality is the right thing to do. Although, not to give him too much credit, he’s trying to weasel around by claiming his stand is personal, not ex cathedra as it were from his day job. Which he’s about to get fired from.

  70. 70.

    Corner Stone

    March 15, 2013 at 12:48 pm

    @Maude: The poo people. That is too good.

  71. 71.

    jl

    March 15, 2013 at 12:48 pm

    @ruemara:

    My comment in moderation due to naughty words. Try again:

    Weak tea BS. I agree getting access due to size of contributions you give or can deliver is bad, but that is the system we have for now.
    Access to Obama for OFA contributions that will go for PR and GOTV for a publicly stated legislative agenda is not the same as private meetings in private back rooms with Harding’s administration 9 * k _ r buddies, Nixon and his gang, or the two Bush presidents.
    I guess Common Cause and a certain type of lefty prefer to unilaterally disarm, then lose, then whine about how awful it all is. That is, they are professional losers.
    Has anyone noticed, BTW, that this is Obama’s second term and he is on his way out in less than four years? I presume he wants to improve Congress so he can get something done in the last two years, and build something for future presidents. OFA is fine with me, if they are open enough about their agenda and I can see a plan and some follow through. If money bigshots get access for that, it is the lesser to two evils.

    Edit: sorry for double post. I did not count on lightning speed moderation. I guess mistermix does not consult video replay.

  72. 72.

    Corner Stone

    March 15, 2013 at 12:52 pm

    @jl: I don’t have a problem with the fundraising methodology. I also don’t have a problem with people asking for the same thing no matter who is in office.

  73. 73.

    scav

    March 15, 2013 at 12:55 pm

    @Joey Maloney: Ther’s also this former legislator from MN. C&L

    …. I cast a politically expedient vote in favor of DOMA and I have regretted that ever since.

    It was not in my conscience or my own compass.

    My dad is a retired Presbyterian minister. In fact, he served the congregation that Reverend Chadwick now serves. I’ve heard lots of bible-based sermons over the years. And never once did I hear that someone else’s love was somehow lesser than the love between my parents of now 55 years. My husband of almost 26 years and I have established and demonstrated our decision making priorities with our two children, stressing people are more important. It’s never been “well, except for those people.”

    Nothing in my life says it’s OK to treat people differently than how I would want to be treated— fairly, respectfully, equally. And that’s really what this conversation is about. Whether you believe in big government or small, do you believe in fair, respectful, equal? Is it ever OK to say “well, except for those people?”

    There’s a fair bit of stifled diversity of opinion, in all honesty, under the traditional lockstep facade.

  74. 74.

    Belafon (formerly anonevent)

    March 15, 2013 at 12:55 pm

    @gvg: The first two people I knew were gay I met in college. One was what you would call the stereotypical gay – the way he walked, talked, and dressed matched everything I knew. The second one I didn’t know was gay until I had known him for about 18 months.

    If I had any gay friends in high school in 88 in west Texas, they cleverly hid themselves. Considering what west Texas was like even that recently, I can understand why. Even straight, I was ready to get away from that backwoods place before I graduated.

  75. 75.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 12:58 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist: @Jay C: It’s a massively failed attempt at twisting our words to suit their purposes — you might call it the devil quoting scripture for his own purposes, if you believed in the devil. Their “argument” is that by legalizing same-sex marriage, we’re infringing on their religious freedoms to hate on gay people; thus, we’re the truly intolerant ones.

    Yep, we’ve heard this shit before, but NOM and its allies are really pushing it now by insisting that marriage equality legislation is only the first step and they have it on good authority that churches refusing to marry dirty gay people will be prosecuted under the tyrant Obama’s justice department. The stories are getting wilder and wilder, and the bigots are eating them up with a spoon and reveling in their status as oppressed Christians. That’s where the “small government” argument, such as it is, comes in.

  76. 76.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 12:59 pm

    @Joey Maloney: He’s not about to get fired. They had to cancel last Saturday’s meeting about whether to oust him because they couldn’t get the votes to do so and didn’t want to look stupid failing.

  77. 77.

    askew

    March 15, 2013 at 12:59 pm

    @shortstop:

    Oddly enough, I think the MN state house will pass Same Sex Marriage before Illinois at this rate. It seems the votes are there in MN and the Governor is on board, but they are waiting to push it through until after the budget is dealt with.

  78. 78.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 1:04 pm

    @askew: Are the votes there? The MN house has a 73-61 Dem advantage. I hope they’re not suffering with blue dogs and bible freaks like we are, because that’s not a huge majority.

    I do think this will pass in Illinois this spring, but we’re really having to work for it. Ridiculous when we have a supermajority like this.

  79. 79.

    scav

    March 15, 2013 at 1:04 pm

    @Mnemosyne: While I’ve got an uncle I need to stare down into making my relationship with my other favorite uncle a formal one. (not that it matters, but all my non-gay uncles are crap so I need reinforcements for the numbers).

    ETA, just remembered one decent straight one, mea culpa. Still need reinforcements.

  80. 80.

    Maude

    March 15, 2013 at 1:04 pm

    @Corner Stone:
    #70
    Not only am I sending you the internets, but a bowl of mac and cheese.

  81. 81.

    aimai

    March 15, 2013 at 1:06 pm

    @greennotGreen:

    But its such a limited understanding. I heard Portman explain, basically, that he’d come around to realizing that maybe he shouldn’t be demonizing and attacking gays but he phrased it as “and here’s another way we can attack the evil liberals and undercut liberals. We will be the real party of family values and ‘support families’ while destroying those terrible liberals who are our polar opposites.” I realize he’s just trying to peddle his family’s problem as some kind of generic solution to Republican problems with voters but here’s the thing: it is beyond him to honestly admit that he reappraised his own attitudes and philosophy about a lot of things and came around to taking the ACTUAL LIBERAL POINT OF VIEW. He is determinedly dishonest and bigoted. Rather than admit that there is, in fact, some justice to liberal/gay perspectives on family and the state he renegotiates the entire thing in his mind and simply classifies his son’s gay marriage as “conservative.” And nothing says conservative more than destroying the enemy: liberalism.

    Fuck him.

  82. 82.

    Corner Stone

    March 15, 2013 at 1:08 pm

    @Maude: I love a good helping of M&C. I’ve been craving the M&C from Luby’s but I never seem to make it there. Been too busy to have the energy to make any homemade.
    So thanks!

  83. 83.

    MattR

    March 15, 2013 at 1:20 pm

    @aimai:

    it is beyond him to honestly admit that he reappraised his own attitudes and philosophy about a lot of things and came around to taking the ACTUAL LIBERAL POINT OF VIEW. He is determinedly dishonest and bigoted. Rather than admit that there is, in fact, some justice to liberal/gay perspectives on family and the state he renegotiates the entire thing in his mind and simply classifies his son’s gay marriage as “conservative.”

    While I understand where you are coming from, I do think there is value to having someone like Portman talking about support for gay marriage being consistent with conservative values since it makes it tougher for other conservatives to use that ideology to reject it. While it would be great if Republicans started supporting gay marriage because they believe in treating gays as equals, having gay marriage become legal across the USA because Republicans claim that big government should not be intruding on what two individuals do would be a decent consolation prize.

  84. 84.

    Punchy

    March 15, 2013 at 1:21 pm

    @scav: I have some reservations about Indian gay marriage….

  85. 85.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 1:22 pm

    @MattR: Publicly, in my own small volunteer efforts for Illinois marriage equality, I agree with you. But if we can’t slam the duplicitous motherfuckers for their self-serving crap here in our own parlor…

  86. 86.

    Anna in PDX

    March 15, 2013 at 1:23 pm

    @Roger Moore: Your take on it offers a clue for a way out – we need to make sure conservatives have more friends. Well, that will be pretty tough since they are such unlikeable people.

  87. 87.

    MattR

    March 15, 2013 at 1:27 pm

    @shortstop: No argument there, though I might say that Portman deserves to be slammed for his self serving change of heart on that single topic no matter what rationale he used to justify it. (along the lines of what Mnemosyne said above)

  88. 88.

    Corner Stone

    March 15, 2013 at 1:27 pm

    @Punchy: Do you have a vision of how it could be worked out?

  89. 89.

    askew

    March 15, 2013 at 1:28 pm

    @scav:

    It looks like the votes are there and we are going to get some Republicans signing on. They expect the House to be the bigger lift, but they are confident they can pass it.

  90. 90.

    askew

    March 15, 2013 at 1:29 pm

    @scav:

    It looks like the votes are there and we are going to get some Republicans signing on. They expect the House to be the bigger lift, but they are confident they can pass it.

  91. 91.

    askew

    March 15, 2013 at 1:30 pm

    @scav:

    It looks like the votes are there and we are going to get some Republicans signing on. They expect the House to be the bigger lift, but they are confident they can pass it.

  92. 92.

    scav

    March 15, 2013 at 1:31 pm

    @Punchy: The chief among them being their tradional heavy involvement in Indian Affairs rather than Indian Wedlock?

  93. 93.

    Foregone Conclusion

    March 15, 2013 at 1:33 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    I can answer that one for you, because we’ve had it in Britain. It basically works along the lines of: marriage (even civil marriage) is an institution that is so ancient and timeless that it doesn’t belong to big gubmint, but to the people. Of course, elected government is the representative of the people’s will, and a majority are in favour of same-sex marriage… but still. Don’t let politicians redefine marriage!

    @MattR:

    I find myself disliking David Cameron more with every passing day, but I will say this: he came up with a very convincing conservative argument for same-sex marriage. It went along the lines of: conservatives believe marriage and the family are good, there’s one group of people who are crazy about getting married while the rest of us don’t seem to care that much, so why don’t we let them get married? Admittedly only half of his godforsaken parliamentary party went along with it, but it’s certainly an intellectually convicing argument that’s quite separate from the simple equal rights argument that liberals put forward.

  94. 94.

    MattR

    March 15, 2013 at 1:34 pm

    @Anna in PDX: As a white straight male, it does not seem right for me to suggest that any gay, female or non-white person suffer through being friends with asshole conservatives, despite the possibility for positive side effects.

    OTOH, there is also the fear that these idiots will take the wrong message from their newfound friends. They will meet someone who survived gay bullying and think that if that person survived it, then it can’t be that bad so there is no reason to take steps to curtail it. (Which is actually how Andrew Sullivan reached a number of his positions, specifically on why there is no need for hate crimes legislation)

  95. 95.

    Foregone Conclusion

    March 15, 2013 at 1:34 pm

    @Jim, Foolish Literalist:

    I can answer that one for you, because we’ve had it in Britain. It basically works along the lines of: marriage (even civil marriage) is an institution that is so ancient and timeless that it doesn’t belong to big gubmint, but to the people. Of course, elected government is the representative of the people’s will, and a majority are in favour of same-sex marriage… but still. Don’t let politicians redefine marriage!

    @MattR:

    I find myself disliking David Cameron more with every passing day, but I will say this: he came up with a very convincing conservative argument for same-sex marriage. It went along the lines of: conservatives believe marriage and the family are good, there’s one group of people who are crazy about getting married while the rest of us don’t seem to care that much, so why don’t we let them get married? Admittedly only half of his godforsaken parliamentary party went along with it, but it’s certainly an intellectually convicing argument that’s quite separate from the simple equal rights argument that liberals put forward.

  96. 96.

    Anna in PDX

    March 15, 2013 at 1:35 pm

    @WereBear: I love autocorrect surrealism.

  97. 97.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 1:36 pm

    @askew: I hope so. “The house will be the bigger lift, but we’re confident we can pass it” were the exact words we heard here last month. I’m not being Nancy Negative — as I said, I think it will pass — but the lift turned out to be a lot bigger than many of us anticipated.

  98. 98.

    Steeplejack

    March 15, 2013 at 1:37 pm

    @Corner Stone:

    Luby’s! Haven’t thought of that in a while.

    When I was a kid we lived in Del Rio and had to make the trek to the orthodontist in San Antonio every month or so. One of the highlights of each trip was the ritual meal at the Luby’s in the North Star Mall. It was wildly extravagant.

  99. 99.

    rikyrah

    March 15, 2013 at 1:38 pm

    let Joey B

    be Joey B

  100. 100.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 1:38 pm

    @Foregone Conclusion:

    Admittedly only half of his godforsaken parliamentary party went along with it

    Oh, but we dream of getting even a handful of our godforsaken Republican party to go along with anything proposed by Obama or the Dems. Half sounds like heaven.

  101. 101.

    scav

    March 15, 2013 at 1:42 pm

    @shortstop: I think that’s probably one of the joys of a really multiparty system. With rivals coming at you from all directions, it’s harder to maintain that sort of laser-focussed all-fronts obstructionism againt a single opponent.

  102. 102.

    rikyrah

    March 15, 2013 at 1:43 pm

    @Cacti:

    “No credible accusation has ever stuck,” and the “anti-clerical left wing” is out to get Frankie.

    if that’s the best you can do… I totally believe it now.

  103. 103.

    shortstop

    March 15, 2013 at 1:45 pm

    @scav: Yes, indeedy.

  104. 104.

    NotMax

    March 15, 2013 at 1:48 pm

    @WereBear

    Uh-huh. Sure it was. For each instance that has become public, no doubt.

    The pattern is there.

  105. 105.

    Randy P

    March 15, 2013 at 1:53 pm

    @Foregone Conclusion: I always reason it this way: the state has some reason for recognizing and providing incentives for an arrangement called “marriage”. Presumably society gets a net gain. Whatever those gains are apply equally well to same-sex marriage.
    The State does not make these decisions on religious grounds. Marriage is defined by the State, not churches. The State just gives churches the right to confer this government-defined contract.

  106. 106.

    Punchy

    March 15, 2013 at 1:59 pm

    @scav: Yes, and they shouldn’t buffalo those traditionalists into getting gay married. If I totem once, I totem a million times, take it slow. Ute cant believe the hostility with some of the elders. I’m surprised they haven’t Sioux-ed yet to stop it. Oh well, put a feather in their cap on this one.

  107. 107.

    Corner Stone

    March 15, 2013 at 2:03 pm

    @Punchy: Aww, I wouldn’t wrestle too much over the issue as I’m sure they’ll reach a peaceful accord.

  108. 108.

    Mnemosyne

    March 15, 2013 at 2:07 pm

    @NotMax:

    The pattern is there.

    Not really — it was a quote that Biden had correctly attributed multiple times before, and the right wing jumped onto the one instance where he forgot.

    If you want to be pissed at him for something, hang on to him being the Senator from MBNA, because he really did screw us all over by supporting some pretty nasty credit card and banking legislation. But the “plagiarism” thing is bunk.

  109. 109.

    NotMax

    March 15, 2013 at 2:27 pm

    @Mnemosyne

    It wasn’t just once that he did not attribute the Kinnock words, it was twice. An earlier occasion dates from his law school days. Three more times (from JFK, from RFK and from Humphrey) while running for president in ’88. That’s a pattern.

    Granted, he’s been better about it since the brain surgeries.

  110. 110.

    scav

    March 15, 2013 at 2:31 pm

    @Punchy: Well, I Hopi didn’t offend you. Things are tricky in this Pomo world, but let me assure you I can appreciate the place Huron. I’m Delaware that the situation is complicated, and there’s Apache history of positions taken over time. It’s not Ioway or the highway.

  111. 111.

    Punchy

    March 15, 2013 at 3:06 pm

    @scav: You sound like a Senator, one who may Cheerokee committee, asking questions and forced to eat Crow. Sauking due to frustration of being Mohawk-ish on the gay marriage issue than the next guy. So angry u just want to punt something, perhaps Kickapoo. Looks like yer up shit Creek.

  112. 112.

    scav

    March 15, 2013 at 3:16 pm

    @Punchy: No, not political, I speak Aztec, mere data jockey, but one with a Hopi Maya create a better world, and transform these series of tubes and Pipes into a vehicle of Peace. File under temporary Idealist, it’ll pass.

  113. 113.

    Violet

    March 15, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    @greennotGreen: I’m very late to the thread, but I think it’s Democrats and other left-leaning independents who would change their minds on gay marriage because of Steve, the nice guy in the office. For Republicans it would take a family member, most likely a child of theirs.

  114. 114.

    Corner Stone

    March 15, 2013 at 5:01 pm

    @scav: You guys have gone completely off the reservation with these awful puns.

  115. 115.

    Debbie(aussie)

    March 15, 2013 at 11:28 pm

    @Violet:
    This! Just read the link and went ranting to my poor hubby, almost word for word.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - Mike in Oly - Woodard Bay Natural Resources Conservation Area
Image by Mike in Oly (5/24/25)

Recent Comments

  • MJN on New Angel Match for the PA Supreme Court Effort by The Civics Center (May 24, 2025 @ 12:26pm)
  • Professor Bigfoot on Late Night Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 12:23pm)
  • Sure Lurkalot on Saturday Morning Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 12:23pm)
  • Ruckus on Late Night Open Thread (May 24, 2025 @ 12:15pm)
  • WaterGirl on New Angel Match for the PA Supreme Court Effort by The Civics Center (May 24, 2025 @ 12:13pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!