• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Accountability, motherfuckers.

Hell hath no fury like a farmer bankrupted.

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

It’s possible to be a liberal firebrand without crapping on the party.

They spent the last eight months firing professionals and replacing them with ideologues.

Hi god, it’s us. Thanks a heap, you’re having a great week and it’s only Thursday!

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Wow, you are pre-disappointed. How surprising.

If ‘weird’ was the finish line, they ran through the tape and kept running.

They want us to be overwhelmed and exhausted. Focus. Resist. Oppose.

Second rate reporter says what?

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

Just because you believe it, that does not make it true.

Red lights blinking on democracy’s dashboard

If you’re gonna whine, it’s time to resign!

A tremendous foreign policy asset… to all of our adversaries.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Dumb motherfuckers cannot understand a consequence that most 4 year olds have fully sorted out.

Republicans do not trust women.

I have other things to bitch about but those will have to wait.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2026 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for Open Threads / Excellent Links

Excellent Links

Respite Open Thread: Why We Fly

by Anne Laurie|  April 9, 20265:06 pm| 92 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Space

OH. MY. GOD.
THIS IS THE MILKY WAY SHOT BY THE ARTEMIS II CREW. LOOK AT ALL THOSE STARS!!!!

[image or embed]

— Jasmine ???? (@astrojaz.bsky.social) April 7, 2026 at 10:48 PM

"I think we as a species need largely symbolic and inspirational projects like this from time to time, to keep us sane and optimistic and in touch with our humanity." defector.com/artemis-moon…

[image or embed]

— Defector (@defector.com) April 8, 2026 at 5:21 PM

Barry Petchesky, at Defector:

It was a lovely day above the Moon. The Artemis astronauts did some science, took lots of pictures, didn’t die or get replaced by bodysnatchers, and perhaps most importantly, made me bawl a couple of times. One was when Orion came back into communications range after 40 nerve-wracking minutes behind the Moon. Mission specialist Christina Koch, after confirming that she and mission control could hear each other loud and clear, gave a stirring little speech. Artemis isn’t the culmination of anything—it’s meant to be just the start of the exploration of the wider cosmos. But, Koch said, no matter where humans go, home is still home.

“We will explore,” Koch said. “We will build. We will build ships. We will visit again. We will construct science outposts. We will drive rovers. We will do radio astronomy. We will found companies. We will bolster industry. We will inspire. But ultimately, we will always choose Earth. We will always choose each other.”…

“As we prepare to go out of radio communication, we’re still able to feel your love from Earth,” pilot Victor Glover said. “And to all of you down there on Earth, and around Earth, we love you from the Moon.”

NASA struck gold with these astronauts, who have endeared themselves with their emergent idiosyncrasies—Wiseman’s quiet, no-nonsense competence; Glover’s gentle faith; Koch’s playfulness; Hansen’s, uh, Canadianness—to anyone watching for any real length of time. We mostly send scientists to space now instead of test pilots, but personality is a big part of the astronaut selection process. That’s not just the ability to get along with each other in a confined space, or to solve problems in an emergency, but how easily viewers back on Earth can connect with them and root for them. This is because Artemis has to sell itself…

I am sympathetic to the view that space exploration is a luxury. I don’t disagree, even. But NASA’s budget is not the reason gas costs $6 a gallon, or why we don’t have universal healthcare or pre-K. We don’t have those because those in charge, and the people who voted for them, have chosen for us not to have those. It is a false binary that we even have to choose at all. The U.S. is the richest polity that has ever existed; there is more than enough money to go around to satisfy basic human services while still funding spaceflight. The people denying us those basic services would very much like for you to identify NASA as the culprit for its $24.4 billion budget, which represents 0.35 percent of all government spending, at the same time a pointless and purposeless war costs us a billion dollars a day, and the government seeks a $1.5 trillion defense budget.

We can afford to go to space. We can, as a technical matter, build the rockets and spacecraft necessary to get us there. Why we go is simply because we can. I think we as a species need largely symbolic and inspirational projects like this from time to time, to keep us sane and optimistic and in touch with our humanity. That’s our big, beautiful Earth, I think when I see the photos from Artemis, and whatever the hell is going on down there. It’s not just four men and women circling the Moon. They’re backed by a crew of thousands around the world, from many countries and cultures, all pulling in the same direction for the greater good. They’re building upon thousands of years of accumulated knowledge. It takes an entire species to do this, and only one species we know of is capable. Yes, we could turn away from the stars, and retreat into our own rivalries and hatreds and selfishness. But when given the choice, as Koch said, “we will always choose each other.”

Respite Open Thread: Why We FlyPost + Comments (92)

Environmental Projection Protection Open Thread: Throwing Mud At A Ground-Breaking Effort

by Anne Laurie|  April 9, 20262:39 am| 76 Comments

This post is in: Environmental Rights, Excellent Links

They just can't leave anything alone, they have to shit on everything:
How the world's largest wildlife crossing became the target of right-wing hate
flip.it/aIlaWy

[image or embed]

— dwise1970.bsky.social (@dwise1970.bsky.social) March 27, 2026 at 1:45 PM

Reader, you will not be surprised to learn that Christopher Rufo is at the center of yet another manufactured right wing outrage cycle.

[image or embed]

— Chris Kluwe (@chriswarcraft.bsky.social) April 6, 2026 at 12:15 AM

Boondoggle! Importing horrors into ‘our’ community!… Christopher Rufo has started a new grift, so I guess the damp-eyed, wet-lipped Think of the children! anti-LGBT+ peddlers market is officially overcrowded. (When Rufo’s heart is weighed by Maat, even Ammit will reject it.)

Per SFGate, “How the world’s largest wildlife crossing became the target of right-wing hate”:

Last week, the newly launched California Post ran an opinion piece headlined “California’s unfinished wildlife ‘bridge to nowhere’ tops $100M.” The authors, both with the conservative think tank the Manhattan Institute, dedicated roughly 750 words to attacking the Agoura Hills wildlife crossing northwest of Los Angeles for two key reasons: Costs are higher, and the completion date is later than initially estimated when the project was first announced five years ago.

None of this was new information, and all of it had previously been reported by various local, state and national news outlets over the past few years. But the opinion piece added sharp new language to describe an inflation-fueled price increase and one-year timeline extension, calling the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing (the largest such crossing in the world) a “jobs program for environmentalists,” a “patronage program” and a “multimillion-dollar bridge to nowhere.”

And crucially, it also left out key details about the project’s updated timeline and price increase.

Within 24 hours, the wildlife crossing — the result of a yearslong, bipartisan effort to protect endangered mountain lions and restore habitat connectivity in California — had become a flash point in America’s ongoing political and cultural divide, fomenting online rage across social media…

show full post on front page

Beth Pratt, a longtime conservation and wildlife advocate in the state who played a major role in organizing efforts to build the bridge, became the target of much of this online outrage. Pratt, a regional executive director at the National Wildlife Federation and president of the Wildlife Crossing Fund, said she’s received threats of violence over the story. She’s turned over threatening voicemails to local law enforcement, and the National Wildlife Federation is considering new safety protocols for upcoming public events.

Pratt, who often wears mountain lion-emblazoned sweaters and leads hikes that retrace the harrowing multiday journey of P-22, a famous LA mountain lion who crossed multiple freeways to reach Griffith Park, has received an endless stream of online vitriol over the past week. Replies to Pratt’s X account and messages sent to her National Wildlife Federation email call her a bimbo, a c—t, a bitch, a lunatic and a fraud. Angry men have left messages threatening to hunt her down if she doesn’t return the state funding used on the bridge…

It’s what Daniel Villaseñor, deputy secretary for communications at the California Natural Resources Agency, calls an engineered “coordinated outrage cycle.” The cycle starts with a “‘report’ from a think-tank-funded outlet,” Villaseñor wrote on LinkedIn last week — in this case from City Journal, a conservative-leaning urban policy magazine published by the Manhattan Institute. “A provocative story is published with no new reporting — just a repackaging of months‑old facts already reported in the mainstream, now framed with a partisan agenda,” Villaseñor added. “The goal isn’t journalism; it’s narrative seeding.”

The next step is amplification by a “major partisan media outlet,” according to Villaseñor, which happened when the Rupert Murdoch-owned California Post (a new offshoot of the New York Post) republished the City Journal piece. From there, right-wing influencers shared snippets of the piece with even less context, and after online outrage grew, the Trump administration posted its own reaction. Finally, Fox News ran a story about the Trump administration’s reaction to the story…

The wildlife crossing near the Los Angeles and Ventura County border in Agoura Hills is considered by many to be the crowning achievement of years of advocacy over habitat connectivity and wildlife in Southern California. When the project was first announced in 2021, it had an estimated completion date of 2025. But construction was delayed by record rain and flooding in 2022 and 2023, and in 2024, a new 2026 completion date was estimated. “We announced [the delay] in 2024 and there has not been any delay since,” Pratt said.

The City Journal and California Post pieces left out this crucial detail: that the bridge is on track to open later this year, making it sound like the bridge was just an expensive piece of forgotten and unfinished infrastructure permanently abandoned over the freeway…

Reached for comment, co-author Christopher Rufo said that the California Post opinion story “is completely accurate and has not been contested in any serious way.” Rufo and co-author Kenneth Schrupp did not respond to specific questions about any of the story’s omissions, including the wildlife crossing’s upcoming completion date. Instead, they disparaged Pratt further…

“The Annenberg Wildlife Crossing is the most ambitious project of its kind in the world with a much larger scale — it does not represent the average cost of our work to build more wildlife connectivity,” the state agency wrote in a post on X, in response to posts from conservative influencers comparing the price tag to a $15 million overpass in Colorado.

“I keep coming back to the facts. And the facts are this is a decades-long, fully vetted project. The facts are that the headlines we are seeing are not based on anything new or anything of substance, and it was an attempt to politicize a project that has been widely supported,” Pratt said.

“All the nonfactual headlines in the world are not going to change the moral compass of this project, which is to preserve wildlife in the Santa Monica Mountains.”

Environmental <del>Projection</del> Protection Open Thread: Throwing Mud At A Ground-Breaking EffortPost + Comments (76)

Interesting Read: ‘Where’s the Exit?’

by Anne Laurie|  April 4, 202611:34 am| 191 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Republicans in Disarray!, Trump Crime Cartel, War

New TIME cover: “Where’s the exit?”

[image or embed]

— Maria Drutska (@mariadrutska.bsky.social) April 3, 2026 at 8:27 AM



Time
, “Inside Trump’s Search for a Way Out of the Iran War”:

Donald Trump was in the Oval Office during the third week of the Iran war when a group of his most trusted advisers came to deliver some unwelcome news.

His longtime pollster, Tony Fabrizio, had conducted surveys that indicated the war Trump launched was growing increasingly unpopular. Gas prices had surged past $4 per gallon, stock markets had tumbled to multi-year lows, and millions of Americans were preparing to take to the streets in protest. Thirteen American service members had been confirmed killed. Some of Trump’s key public supporters were criticizing a conflict with no clear end in sight. It fell on White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and a small group of aides to tell the President that the longer the war dragged on, the more it would threaten his public support and Republicans’ prospects in November’s midterm elections.

For Trump, the stark warning was unsettling. The President has begun many recent mornings watching video clips compiled by military officials of battlefield successes, according to a senior Administration official. He has told advisers that being the commander in chief to eliminate the nuclear threat posed by Iran could be one of his signature achievements. But Wiles, according to two White House sources, was concerned aides were giving the President a rose-colored view of how the war was being perceived domestically, telling Trump what he wanted to hear instead of what he needed to hear. She had urged colleagues, the officials say, to be “more forthright with the boss” about the political and economic risks…

The President was left frustrated by the predicament, at odds with some of his own officials, and fuming at the negative impressions of the war. The mounting political and economic toll has left him looking for an off-ramp, according to two advisers and two members of Congress who have spoken to him during the last week. Trump told them he wants to wind down the campaign, wary of a protracted conflict that could hobble Republicans heading into the midterms. At the same time, he wants the operation to be a decisive success. Allies say he is searching for a way to declare victory, halt the fighting, and hope that economic conditions stabilize before the political damage hardens. “There’s a narrow window,” says a senior Administration official, who like others interviewed for this account of Trump at war was granted anonymity to provide candid observations about the President’s thinking…

show full post on front page

In a phone interview the next morning, Trump told TIME that Iran was eager to make a deal to end the fighting. ‘Why wouldn’t they call? We just blew up their three big bridges last night,” the President says. “They’re getting decimated. They say Trump is not negotiating with Iran. I mean, it’s sort of an easy negotiation.”

And yet behind the bluster has been a growing recognition within the West Wing that the situation may be slipping out of its control. Key Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, were surprised by the barrage of retaliatory attacks Tehran launched against U.S. and Israeli targets across the region, including in countries long assumed to be off-limits: Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar, a state that had both harbored Iran’s terrorist proxies and served as a conduit for backchannel diplomacy between the U.S. and Hamas. The response shattered the assumption that Tehran would confine itself to performative retaliation. In internal deliberations before the war’s launch, Hegseth had pointed to Iran’s muted reaction to Trump’s past attacks as evidence that calibrated force could impose costs on Tehran without triggering a broader war. Hegseth “was caught off guard. There’s no question,” says a person familiar with his thinking…

The plan of attack was set in motion nearly a month before it was executed, according to two senior U.S. officials. It took weeks of meticulous coordination, much of it conducted in close consultation with Israeli counterparts. When the New York Times published details of the planning of the operation on Feb. 17, Trump exploded at aides, unleashing a string of profanities, according to a senior Administration official. The President then told reporters he would decide on strikes within “10, 15 days,” although he knew the U.S. was planning to attack much sooner. “He was intentionally engaged in public misdirection to protect the mission,” a White House official says.

Trump became wary enough of leaks that some of his own aides were the target of subterfuge. On Feb. 27, he traveled to Mar-a-Lago. Aides assembled in a makeshift Situation Room. Trump bristled at the number of people present. “He thought the group was too big,” one official recalls; it included people Trump didn’t recognize or didn’t feel he knew well enough. At one point, the President snapped that the operation was off. He said he would keep deliberating. This was another head fake: Trump had already made up his mind to attack that very night. Once the room cleared, he called back a smaller, trusted circle—those he wanted beside him as the first bombs fell.

That evening, Trump had dinner on the patio of Mar-a-Lago with a group that included deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Witkoff, and White House counsel David Warrington. Not present was Vice President J.D. Vance, who was in the Situation Room back in Washington. A Trump official says that was a reflection of standard continuity-of-government protocol, which calls for the President and Vice President to be kept apart during sensitive national security operations when both are not at the White House. Of the President’s inner circle, Vance had pushed hardest against the operation, according to two sources familiar with the deliberations. “J.D. really doesn’t like this,” Trump told the group gathered under the Palm Beach stars. “But when the decision is made, it’s a decision, right?”…

How the war may shape November’s elections—and what those results will mean for the rest of his presidency—is a question that hangs over Trump’s decisions. Some advisers detect a note of resignation in the President’s thinking. In private discussions, he often points out that the party in power tends to lose ground in the midterms. “He’s having trouble getting past the history,” an aide observes. But history also suggests there can be worse outcomes for a President who takes the nation to war than losing an election.

> @time.com
time.com/article/2026…

[image or embed]

— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla.bsky.social) April 2, 2026 at 8:03 PM

Pretty sure one of the ‘two White House sources’ mentioned in the clip is Susie Wiles. And the other one, I’d bet a store-bought cookie, is JD Vance (or a trusted Vance associate).

Crazy to assume that if Trump heard the truth, he would believe it.

— Ric Steinberger (@ricst.bsky.social) April 2, 2026 at 8:07 PM

every single one of these fired losers will sycophantically praise trump on the way out and as soon as he dies will claim they were fired for being the only person in the room to dare to stand up to him

— darth™️ (@darthbluesky.bsky.social) April 3, 2026 at 12:39 AM

Interesting Read: <em>‘Where’s the Exit?’</em>Post + Comments (191)

Late Night Open Thread: Bari Weiss (& David Ellison) Not Having A Great Month

by Anne Laurie|  March 29, 20262:03 am| 41 Comments

This post is in: C.R.E.A.M., Excellent Links, Media, Open Threads, Our Failed Media Experiment, Schadenfreude

One would actually suggest with the debt load paramount is carrying, the current trajectory of CBS is very dangerous for it.

[image or embed]

— Schnorkles O'Bork (@schnorkles.bsky.social) March 27, 2026 at 10:12 AM

Noah Berlatsky, at his SubStack — “Bari Weiss Is A Losing Loser Who Is Losing”:

Bari Weiss, the fash-friendly new editor-in-chief of CBS News, has in six months turned a historic and respected news org into a punchline from which viewers are running like rats fleeing a ship that is sinking, on fire, and beset with plague. According to Oliver Darcy at Status, the network is “on track for its lowest-rated first quarter of the 21st century in both total viewers and the advertiser-coveted 25-54 demo.” Darcy also points out that ABC and NBC have had viewership increases in both morning and evening—which means that CBS is bucking positive trends, and/or is bleeding viewers to its competitors…

And yet, whenever more news of her disastrous tenure hits the interwebs, many on the left insist that the disasters were all part of the plan. Billionaire asshole Trump cronies David and Larry Ellison wanted to destroy CBS journalism and align the network with Trumpism, the argument goes. They don’t care if it bleeds viewers and dollars as long as its reporting is kneecapped and it toes the party line.

It’s true that the Ellisons wanted to make CBS into a Fox News clone. But part of the allure of Fox News clone status is cloning Fox’s audience numbers and revenue. Oligarchs like the Ellisons and Jeff Bezos sincerely believe that taking their media properties hard right will be a financial bonanza. When it isn’t, they lose—and the rest of us win, not everything, but real ground….

…[B]illionaires like the Ellisons and their sycophantic boot-lickers like Bari Weiss all sincerely, truly believe that they speak for the real, true core of Americanness. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill Ackman, Donald Trump—all these heirs and hedge fund assholes and grotesque corrupt swindlers bloated with avarice and hate—they all think they are the true voice of the common man, and that the branch-campus professors pointing out that racism exists, or the trans middle-schoolers who want to play basketball, or the Palestinian-Americans existing, are the out of touch elite who must be stifled and ridiculed in the name of the volk. The oligarchs see themselves not as disgusting parasites bleeding the public dry, but as bold everydudes whose success demonstrates both their brilliance and their understanding of white male cishet bigoted Joe Average, who has been sitting in front of his television all day every day just waiting for the chance to turn his TV from Fox News to Johnny-come-lately Fox News that’s somewhat more ambivalent about being state TV for Trump and somewhat less ambivalent about being state TV for Netanyahu.

Obviously if you are not paid to stuff your head up a billionaire’s asshole every day, you are probably aware that billionaires are not in fact psychically connected to the volk. Also, it may have occurred to you that the conservative marketplace is incredibly saturated already, and that CBS viewers probably would turn on Fox News if they wanted Fox News…

Weiss believes she is the voice of the people and the people have solidly rejected her and her bullshit. That has to be a foul pill for her to swallow. Less discussed, but perhaps even more humiliating, is her utter failure to turn CBS into a force in the right-wing marketplace.

Weiss’ blogging platform, The Free Press (which CBS acquired) carved out a position as a clearinghouse for supposedly highbrow right-wing screeds, making the intellectual case for DEI, transphobia and hate—a place for Ivy Leaguers and would-be Ivy Leaguers to come together and rigorously apportion footnotes to their genocidal impulses. Weiss clearly hoped that with the oomph of CBS behind her, she could move more forcefully into the right-wing media sphere, influencing the discourse and poaching the audience of quasi-Nazi bloggers, Christofascist podcasters and manosphere YouTubers alike…

Ellison did get some of what he wanted. But he didn’t get the monetary windfall he expected. He almost surely still believes that right-wing news is a goldmine if only he could put the right person in charge. Weiss is clearly not that person—which means that her job is by no means secure. Ellison has to be doing a real gut check, too, about whether Weiss—who has destroyed CBS’ ratings and influence—is the right person to helm his new acquisition of CNN.

So yes, CBS and probably CNN have been badly damaged, oligarchy has been strengthened, journalism and a free press are harmed. But it’s also true that Weiss humiliating failures serve as a helpful tonic for all the mainstream media bozos constantly looking with wistful envy at Fox News and dreaming of a conservative turn that drives up viewer or reader numbers.

The story of CBS and the Washington Post over the last two years is a cautionary tale about right-wing branding. The country does not have some huge untapped well of underserved rabid fascists; Trump’s narrow 2024 victory did not herald a massive cultural shift for all time. Oligarchs and their minions who ignore that truth are going to lose (a lot) of money and (even more) status. And yes, billionaires hate to lose money and status. Not enough to admit they’re wrong, perhaps. But enough to take it out on people like Bari Weiss.

If I understand correctly, David Ellison is doing all this on his Daddy’s dollars. Of course, Oracle can afford to throw away a billion here & there, and Larry has been extremely indulgent of his #failson’s grandious fantasies… but one would suspect that eventually, the old man is gonna decide that it’s time for a little #tough love, yes?

Bari Weiss was given a role outside of her skillset. She’s good at finding issues the enemy coalition is cross-pressured on and relentlessly hammering them from a facially neutral position. But doing that from a Substack is different from doing it at CBS.

— William B. Fuckley (@opinionhaver.bsky.social) March 18, 2026 at 10:06 PM

show full post on front page

The one thing she has done that is worth emulating is relentlessly focusing mostly not too obviously biased reporting on where the cracks in the opposition are. But fundamentally CBS is not the same platform for that as The Free Press.

— William B. Fuckley (@opinionhaver.bsky.social) March 18, 2026 at 10:09 PM

Anyway, give me $150 million and I’ll start a publication that relentlessly reports on right wing policies regarding vaccines and tariffs.

— William B. Fuckley (@opinionhaver.bsky.social) March 18, 2026 at 10:11 PM

=====

Bari Weiss' biggest problem isn't that she's bad at journalism (she wasn't hired to do journalism), it's that she's bad at ratings-grabbing agitprop.

[image or embed]

— Karl Bode (@karlbode.com) March 18, 2026 at 1:43 PM

she'll be ousted by the end of summer and replaced with a more ruthless manfluencer brunchlord with a more savvy ability to viralize race-baiting propaganda

— Karl Bode (@karlbode.com) March 18, 2026 at 1:45 PM

I do think a particular clever and terrible right winger could fuse TikTok and CBS and hybridize broadcast TV with right wing red pill greedfluencer gambling/MMA/ culture in a very deadly way, but these folks aren't just incompetent, they're cocksure and half mad and can't see the field clearly

— Karl Bode (@karlbode.com) March 18, 2026 at 3:22 PM

Earlier:

very good piece which confirms that weiss is both exceptionally arrogant and totally out of her depth. www.newyorker.com/magazine/202…

[image or embed]

— jamelle (@jamellebouie.net) January 19, 2026 at 10:26 AM

Late Night Open Thread: Bari Weiss (& David Ellison) Not Having A Great MonthPost + Comments (41)

Open Thread: Trump, Not-So-Sharpie

by Anne Laurie|  March 27, 20268:57 pm| 54 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Open Threads, Republican Politics, Trumpery

Trump imagines negotiation with Sharpie maker for $5 signature pens
Trump told a lengthy story about my negotiating over the price of Sharpie pens. The company says it has no record of any such conversation.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202…

[image or embed]

— Frank Amari (@frankamari.bsky.social) March 27, 2026 at 7:19 PM

President Donald Trump spent five minutes of Thursday’s Cabinet meeting boasting of his thrift with a story about negotiating for $5 personalized Sharpies. The company that makes the permanent markers said the exchange never happened.

Trump was busy touting his plans to make over the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and criticizing the renovation of the Federal Reserve headquarters when he went off on a tangent about the pen he was holding…

Trump, whose preference for Sharpies is as well known as his tendency to embellish, exaggerate and fabulize, said he asked the marker maker for a solution to make the pens look more official.

“I called the guy, I said, ‘I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a great thing with a big S on it saying Sharpie as I’m signing a $1 trillion airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets,’” Trump said.

“He says, ‘Well, I can make it nicer.’…

“‘And I can even paint the White House on it, sir, if you like, in gold.’ Almost real gold. Not bad. ‘And I can even do your signature, sir.’”

Trump went on: “So the guy said to me, ‘You don’t have to pay me, sir. I’ll give them to you for nothing.’”…

“‘No, sir. You don’t have to. You’re the president of the United States.’ He was shocked. The head of Sharpie. He gets a call. I don’t even know who the hell he is.”…

“And he said, ‘What would you like to pay?’”

“I said, ‘How about five bucks a pen?’”…

Presented with a transcript of Trump’s account, a spokesperson for Sharpie maker Newell Brands said it did not occur.

“We don’t have any information about the conversation described,” the spokesperson said. “We’re proud to be a beloved brand trusted by so many globally.”

The White House did not respond to requests to clarify Trump’s account, including whom he spoke with and when, and how he did obtain black Sharpies with his signature in gold.

 
Can we indict the entire GOP for elder abuse now? Mary Geddry, at her SubStack — “The Sharpie, the Sizzle Reel, and the War”:

What keeps happening now, over and over, is that the White House can still control records, limit disclosure, curate camera angles, and flood the zone with loyalist noise, but it is having a harder and harder time controlling the one thing that matters most: the spectacle of Donald Trump in public for long stretches of time. No one outside his medical team can responsibly diagnose him from clips, transcripts, or cabinet-room wanderings. It is also true that ordinary viewers are not hallucinating when they notice a pattern: the repetition, the drift, the inability to hold a coherent thread, the constant collapse from policy into fixation, grievance, and trivia. The concern is no longer built only from rumor or whispered palace intrigue. It is built from performance.

I give you the Sharpie moment. A president in the middle of a national-security event, with war, NATO, oil chokepoints, and global escalation supposedly on the table, suddenly disappears into a meandering monologue about government pens, expensive pens, bad pens, good pens, Sharpies, how kids were getting thousand-dollar pens, how the pens did not write, how he personally negotiated the superior pen deal, and how all of this somehow reflected his genius as a steward of public money. Trump has always rambled. What felt different here was the texture of the ramble. It was not merely loose; it was compulsive, repetitive, detached from context, and delivered with the same manic insistence as his war talk, as if the fate of the republic and the quality of office supplies were all one uninterrupted stream of presidential consciousness. It is precisely the kind of public degradation that no physician’s letter can fully override once millions of people have seen it with their own eyes.

show full post on front page

The entire cabinet meeting unfolded like an empire in late-stage delusion trying to produce its own highlight reel before the walls close in. Trump’s basic message on Iran was that everything had been crushed, everyone was begging him for peace, and he might continue bombing anyway because, in his telling, peace is something you establish by acting like the villain in an action movie who has confused terror with leverage. He insisted, “They are begging to work out a deal,” then immediately undercut any notion of restraint by adding, “I don’t know if we’re willing to do that,” and later, even more bluntly, “We have other targets we want to hit before we leave.” That is a man trying to sound both indispensable and unhinged at the same time…

None of them sounded like adults managing risk. They sounded like hype men assigned to narrate the emperor’s cut of the footage. Through all of it, Trump kept drifting. Iran became Venezuela, Venezuela became the border, the border became Chicago, which became DC, which became the Kennedy Center. The Kennedy Center became ceilings, marble, fake gold, and a construction-cost rant about the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve became pens, which became proof of his genius. The whole cabinet meeting played like the stream of consciousness of a man who cannot distinguish between national-security priorities and whatever object most recently floated across the surface of his attention. The administration wanted it seen as a projection of command, but what it actually showed was drift, self-absorption, and a staggering inability to separate the enormous from the trivial…

The final and perhaps ugliest layer beneath all of this is the one Matt Randolph points to: the likelihood that Saudi Arabia is the largest beneficiary of this entire mess. Randolph’s argument is not that Saudi Arabia necessarily caused the war or scripted the escalation beat by beat. It is that Riyadh is positioned to profit from it more elegantly than almost anyone else. Saudi Arabia spent years enduring lower prices and maintaining pressure on U.S. shale while preserving its own ability to move quickly when the market snapped tight. Now, with Hormuz unstable, tanker traffic disrupted, and fear embedded in the supply chain, Saudi Arabia finds itself sitting on spare capacity and some of the cheapest production on the planet while U.S. shale producers remain cautious, disciplined, and far less eager than the fantasy-energy crowd imagines to surge output just because prices flirt with triple digits. Recent reporting on the Dallas Fed survey suggests exactly that: most firms are not rushing to overhaul their 2026 production plans despite the war-driven price spike. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has already managed to revive more than half its normal export flow using its Red Sea bypass rather than relying exclusively on Hormuz, giving Riyadh flexibility that others simply do not have.

Layer onto that the reporting that Mohammed bin Salman has been privately urging Trump toward a sustained hard line against Iran, describing the conflict as a historic opportunity to weaken or even reshape a rival regime, and the picture gets darker still. This does not prove that MBS is the puppet master, nor that Trump is a marionette whose every move is scripted in Riyadh. It does suggest a deeply disturbing alignment of incentives. Saudi Arabia gets the geopolitical satisfaction of seeing Iran battered and constrained, and it gets the market satisfaction of tighter supply, firmer prices, and an American shale patch too disciplined, too scarred, or too hedged to flood the market in response. In that sense, Randolph is right: Saudi Arabia may emerge as the prime beneficiary because it positioned itself long before the missiles flew and now stands ready to collect while everyone else absorbs the chaos.

There rest of us must bear witness to a White House struggling to hide the visual evidence of decline as the president drifts from global war to pen reviews without noticing the difference.

Open Thread: Trump, Not-So-SharpiePost + Comments (54)

Open Thread: Our ‘Not Enough Facepalms’ Administration

by Anne Laurie|  March 25, 20267:15 pm| 68 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, Open Threads, Republican Venality, Trump Crime Cartel, War

Iran rejects ceasefire as widely predicted.

[image or embed]

— George Pearkes (@peark.es) March 25, 2026 at 8:38 AM

Forget TACO, we are approaching the NACHOOO Zone
Not
Able to
Cease
Hostilities
On
Our
Own
‪

This is what is consistently missing from coverage of Trump’s blurts about the war, and especially market reaction. He controls very little.
The key to ending the war is reopening the Straight, and Iran has total control over when (and what) transit occurs there. The war ends when they say so.

[image or embed]

— Douglas Moser (@douglasmoser.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 12:33 PM

No problem, libs!

We are literally planning an actual war around what is essentially a Call of Duty highlight reel.

[image or embed]

— Starfire’s Deranged Neocon Foreign Policy Podcast (@irhottakes.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 8:02 AM

… The daily montage typically runs for about two minutes, sometimes longer, the officials said. One described each daily video as a series of clips of “stuff blowing up.”

The highlight reel of U.S. Central Command bombing Iranian equipment and military sites isn’t the only briefing Trump gets about the war. He’s also updated through conversations with top military and intelligence advisers, foreign leaders and news reports, the officials said.

But the video briefing is fueling concerns among some of Trump’s allies that he may not be receiving — or absorbing — the complete picture of the war, now in its fourth week, two of the current officials and the former official said.

They said the videos are also driving Trump’s increasing frustration with news coverage of the war. Trump has pointed to the success depicted in the daily videos to privately question why his administration can’t better influence the public narrative, asking aides why the news media doesn’t emphasize what he’s seeing, one of the current U.S. officials and the former U.S. official said. ..

“We can’t tell him every single thing that happens,” a current U.S. official said. The official noted that Trump’s briefings tend to draw better feedback from his aides when they focus on U.S. victories.

Overall, the official said, the information Trump gets about the war tends to emphasize U.S. successes, with comparatively little detail about Iranian actions.

One example came this month when five U.S. Air Force refueling planes were hit in an Iranian strike at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia, according to one of the current U.S. officials. Trump wasn’t briefed about the strikes, and he learned what had happened from media reports, the official said. When Trump inquired, he was told the planes weren’t badly damaged, the official said.

The official said Trump reacted angrily behind the scenes to the news coverage. Publicly he posted on Truth Social calling coverage of the strike misleading and accusing media organizations of wanting the U.S. “to lose the War.” …

show full post on front page

Elsewhere…

I was told this constituted concealing military objectives inside civilian areas. Hostage-taking, essentially. Hope there aren't any elementary schools nearby!

[image or embed]

— Chatham Harrison dba TRUMP DELENDUS EST (@chathamharrison.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 3:14 PM

Ooo, 5000 Marines (including support troops) against a country with a population the size of Germany’s.

[image or embed]

— Patrick Chovanec (@prchovanec.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 4:23 PM


Pastor Mike Johnson, Speaker for the Enabling Party
:

More from the Speaker to me about 2,000 troops:
"The build up of troops is very different than boots on the ground. We don't have boots on the ground. I don't think that's the intention, but I think Iran should watch that build up, and they need to take note of that."

[image or embed]

— Eric Michael Garcia (@ericmgarcia.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 10:59 AM

We've got to continue waging the war to get something back that we had before we started the war.

[image or embed]

— Patrick Chovanec (@prchovanec.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 8:44 AM

Contra:

Even the crazy lady gets it.

[image or embed]

— Patrick Chovanec (@prchovanec.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 3:41 PM

Forget the Madman Theory, this maladministration has invented the Idiot Theory!

"I DONT WANNA PLAY ANYMORE THIS ISNT FUN FOR ME NOW!!"

[image or embed]

— Daniel Gilmore (@gilmored85.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 1:57 PM

Besides Trump only being capable of bullshitting ppl, another huge driver in the collapse of his presidency is his inability to understand culpability. His narcissistic ego doesnt allow for it in order to protect itself, so "dont do unpopular things bc ppl will blame you" just doesnt compute to him

— Daniel Gilmore (@gilmored85.bsky.social) March 25, 2026 at 11:54 AM

What a creative way to say Trump has no plan in Iran…

[image or embed]

— Congresswoman Sara Jacobs (@sarajacobs.house.gov) March 25, 2026 at 2:37 PM

Open Thread: Our ‘Not Enough Facepalms’ AdministrationPost + Comments (68)

Late Night Open Thread: “God Is A Comedian”

by Anne Laurie|  March 24, 20262:30 am| 48 Comments

This post is in: Excellent Links, War

This is excellent.
open.substack.com/pub/no01/p/m…

[image or embed]

— Bill Kristol (@billkristolbulwark.bsky.social) March 22, 2026 at 7:53 PM

The Trickster God is certainly not a *subtle* comedian, and Donald Trump is one of his strongest chaos agents. Clips from this post at the Gold and Geopolitics SubStack are being widely shared, with good reason:

It is a well-established fact that the universe has a sense of humour. It is less well-established, but increasingly obvious, that the humour is of the kind best enjoyed from a great distance, like, let’s say the moon.

Three weeks into the Iran war, reality has passed through the looking glass, out the other side, and is now selling tickets to the gift shop. What follows is not satire. Satire requires exaggeration, and you cannot exaggerate something that is already operating at maximum absurdity. This is simply the news, and nothing but the news. Told straight, in a universe that has clearly stopped taking its medication.

The United States is sending 5,000 Marines into the Persian Gulf to seize Kharg Island, a speck of land 15 miles off the Iranian coast that handles 90% of Iran’s oil exports. This is, on paper, a reasonable military objective in the same way that sticking your hand into a beehive is a reasonable way to acquire honey. It is technically correct. The bees would disagree…

A White House source told Axios they need “about a month to weaken the Iranians more” before attempting this. One month. Of a war Trump described as ‘winding down’ on Friday – three weeks in, which by his count is basically four days… Both statements were made, as far as anyone can tell, by people who occupy the same government and occasionally share a building.

A former Navy SEAL called the plan “insane”. A retired Vice Admiral called it “a massacre-in-making scenario”. A retired Rear Admiral pointed out that even if they seize the island, Iran simply turns off the pipeline at the other end. Frankly, I think they’re being extremely polite. This is a clusterfuck of historic proportions and everyone who’s ever held a rank knows it…

show full post on front page

There exists in diplomacy a concept known as “sanctions”, which works on the same principle as telling a child they can’t have dessert while you’re eating cake in front of them. The United States has been sanctioning Iran for years. It has also been bombing Iran for three weeks. These are, in the normal course of events, complementary activities. One is economic warfare. The other is the regular kind.

This week, the US Treasury lifted all oil sanctions on Iran. For 30 days. 140 million barrels of Iranian crude, sitting on ships at sea, may now be sold freely on the global market. Including to the United States itself.

In yuan…

The logic, insofar as there is any, goes like this: the war has crashed the global oil market so hard that the administration needs the enemy’s oil to keep gasoline prices from eating the midterms. They are unsanctioning the people they’re bombing because the bombing is working too well at the thing they didn’t want it to do. The sanctions were necessary to stop Iran funding the war, but the war made the sanctions too effective, so the sanctions had to be lifted to fund the war effort against the country that no longer needs sanctions because the oil revenues that sanctions were preventing are now required to prevent the economic damage caused by preventing those revenues, which is itself a consequence of the military campaign designed to make the sanctions unnecessary by making Iran the kind of country that doesn’t need sanctioning, which it would be, if the sanctions hadn’t been lifted to pay for making it that…

On the other end of all this, sits Iran’s Foreign Minister Araghchi, who is not answering texts from US envoy Steve Witkoff. And why would he? The last Iranian official who engaged in negotiations was Ali Larijani, head of the Supreme National Security Council. Israel killed him. The supreme leader before that was killed on day one. Defence Secretary Hegseth is openly calling senior IRGC positions “temp jobs”. You are assassinating everyone with the authority to negotiate and then complaining, with what appears to be genuine bewilderment, that nobody will negotiate.

This is the diplomatic equivalent of burning down every restaurant in town and then leaving a bad Yelp review about the lack of dining options…

Much more at the link. If you love our own Tony Jay‘s posts, you’ll enjoy this!

Late Night Open Thread: <em>“God Is A Comedian”</em>Post + Comments (48)

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 390
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - SkyBluePink - Skies of blues & pinks 2
Photo by SkyBluePink (4/14/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • TheQuietOne on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Apr 15, 2026 @ 5:48am)
  • Ramalama on Two Balloon Juice Items This Week for Your Calendar (Open Thread) (Apr 15, 2026 @ 5:20am)
  • rikyrah on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Apr 15, 2026 @ 4:58am)
  • Jay on War for Ukraine Day 1510: Putin Lashes Out (Apr 15, 2026 @ 4:48am)
  • Elizabelle on War for Ukraine Day 1510: Putin Lashes Out (Apr 15, 2026 @ 4:04am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)
Sister Golden Bear

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc