• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Putting aside our relentless self-interest because the moral imperative is crystal clear.

But frankly mr. cole, I’ll be happier when you get back to telling us to go fuck ourselves.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

rich, arrogant assholes who equate luck with genius

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

Seems like a complicated subject, have you tried yelling at it?

Boeing: repeatedly making the case for high speed rail.

Michigan is a great lesson for Dems everywhere: when you have power…use it!

… gradually, and then suddenly.

They want us to be overwhelmed and exhausted. Focus. Resist. Oppose.

It’s easy to sit in safety and prescribe what other people should be doing.

“A king is only a king if we bow down.” – Rev. William Barber

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

We can’t confuse what’s necessary to win elections with the policies that we want to implement when we do.

The republican ‘Pastor’ of the House is an odious authoritarian little creep.

Come on, man.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

One way or another, he’s a liar.

You cannot love your country only when you win.

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

Our messy unity will be our strength.

We will not go back.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Payment reform problem

Payment reform problem

by David Anderson|  July 31, 20177:55 am| 8 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Keeping babies out of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit should be an unambiguously a good thing if the avoidance is because the babies are being born healthier and in less need of intensive care immediately after birth. There are steps that hospitals, doctors and the rest of the healthcare system can do to tilt the field so that fewer babies are born in severe need of care. Those steps reduce suffering, increase happiness and lower costs.

Well, it is not an unambiguous good thing as this article from the Providence Journal shows an incentive problem:

Care New England reported a $40-million loss during the first half of its fiscal year (Oct. 1-March 31), with the deepest declines at Women & Infants Hospital and Pawtucket-based Memorial Hospital.

Women & Infants delivers the vast majority of babies in Rhode Island, with close to 9,000 births a year — 10 to 20 times the volume of any of the six other hospitals in Rhode Island with obstetrics programs.

Hospital officials have attributed the losses to declining birth rates and reduced volume in the neonatal intensive care unit due to improvements in the health of premature infants.

The specialized maternity care hospital is losing money because an expensive service is not being used as much because the population is healthier. From a cost curve perspective, this is a good thing. From a infant health perspective, this is a wonderful thing. From keeping that capacity open and available, this is a problem. One solution is that Rhode Island loses high end Ob-gyn capacity and they send all the hard cases up to Boston. That is a viable solution.

Another potential solution is to come up with some type of maternity care bundle or an alternative payment reform that throws money back to the hospital for the savings it realized by having fewer babies than expected go to the NICU.

As we try to bend the cost curve, we’re going to see more stories like this. There will be winners, there will be losers as we try to figure out how to make the population as a whole both healthier and using less expensive services to maintain or improve health.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « On the Road and In Your Backyard
Next Post: Bring out your problems »

Reader Interactions

8Comments

  1. 1.

    Ohio Mom

    July 31, 2017 at 8:23 am

    Even if sending all the hard cases to Boston is the best solution here, I imagine there are other hospitals also taking hits on the decline of NICU cases that don’t have a “Boston” nearby.

  2. 2.

    Karen

    July 31, 2017 at 8:31 am

    recently read report that while we are doing better taking care of babies we are losing more women to after birth problems, we have become so focused on babies that some doctors are not being taught how to take care of mothers
    there is also a push to no longer teacher doctors how to do an abortion, one report said they don’t even want to teach them how to do a D & C

  3. 3.

    dr. bloor

    July 31, 2017 at 8:43 am

    Similar story at St. Vincent’s in NYC in the 90’s. Once sophisticated treatments for HIV were on the scene, they had problems keeping beds occupied. Finally shut down in 2010.

    As for Care New England, they’re a bit of a train wreck above and beyond any challenges posed by birthin’ healthy babies.

  4. 4.

    Gin & Tonic

    July 31, 2017 at 9:08 am

    Second that comment about Care New England. But Women & Infants is a wonderful place. Our son was born there, and my wife worked there for many years, although was hit by a round of layoffs a while back.

    While the decline in NICU cases is indeed good for humans, one of the things that’s mentioned only in passing as a factor is demographics – RI is getting older, as the young people with drive and ambition move. If they have difficult obstetric cases they won’t have to travel to Boston or NY – they already live there.

  5. 5.

    Villago Delenda Est

    July 31, 2017 at 9:18 am

    This general problem (just not enough cases to sustain the operation) applies to rural hospitals in general.

    It winds up being as much a political as an economic problem.

  6. 6.

    Karen

    July 31, 2017 at 10:01 am

    we now have corporation hospitals and treatment centers, instead of small private hospitals. yes, they can . afford better equipment but the price for one day standard room runs about $10,000 then everything is expensive a bag of saline costs about $1 and patients are changed $100 or more. I was in hospital and due to divorce had to pay for it since I moved to state that didn’t have ACA. I was in for 3 days and ended up paying $45,000
    One of my pet peeves is that if a doctor or therapist pops head in and asking how you doing, you get charge for visit. Used to piss me off when they did this to step daughter as a CF patient who was usually in burn or cancer ward that head pop could cost $500. Even with having great insurance the copay was expensive. they are all in business of making money, the only ones who are the nurses that actually keep you alive and help you get healthy again

  7. 7.

    jharp

    July 31, 2017 at 10:21 am

    The specialized maternity care hospital is losing money because an expensive service is not being used as much because the population is healthier.

    This is awesome. ObamaCare is working and improving lives.

  8. 8.

    Racer X

    July 31, 2017 at 10:58 am

    Congratulations. If a healthcare network is truly successful then you end up with an empty hospital. This is why healthcare requires a different financial model. Duh.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - ema - Midtown Manhattan Fall Foliage
Image by ema (12/16/25)

2026 Pets of Balloon Juice Calendar

PLEASE REVIEW YOUR INFO ASAP

Recent Comments

  • Princess on Plagues & Pandemics Update – December 17, 2025 (Dec 17, 2025 @ 6:39am)
  • What Have the Romans Ever Done for Us? on Late Night Open Thread: Creatures of Darkness (Dec 17, 2025 @ 6:01am)
  • rikyrah on Late Night Open Thread: Creatures of Darkness (Dec 17, 2025 @ 6:00am)
  • rikyrah on Plagues & Pandemics Update – December 17, 2025 (Dec 17, 2025 @ 5:59am)
  • lowtechcyclist on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Dec 17, 2025 @ 5:53am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!