• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Mediocre white men think RFK Jr’s pathetic midlife crisis is inspirational. The bar is set so low for them, it’s subterranean.

Tick tock motherfuckers!

Those who are easily outraged are easily manipulated.

America is going up in flames. The NYTimes fawns over MAGA celebrities. No longer a real newspaper.

You’re just a puppy masquerading as an old coot.

You can’t attract Republican voters. You can only out organize them.

They are not red states to be hated; they are voter suppression states to be fixed.

That’s my take and I am available for criticism at this time.

Since when do we limit our critiques to things we could do better ourselves?

Hot air and ill-informed banter

“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

They want us to be overwhelmed and exhausted. Focus. Resist. Oppose.

This country desperately needs a functioning fourth estate.

Polls are now a reliable indicator of what corporate Republicans want us to think.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

How stupid are these people?

The line between political reporting and fan fiction continues to blur.

Innocent people do not delay justice.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Let me file that under fuck it.

Historically it was a little unusual for the president to be an incoherent babbling moron.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

You are either for trump or for democracy. Pick one.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Alternatives to ACA plans

Alternatives to ACA plans

by David Anderson|  June 9, 20218:48 am| 19 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Tom’s post on a woman in Massachusetts getting screwed on a cost-sharing ministry health payment plan is a good opportunity to talk about the alternatives to ACA individual market qualified health plans (QHPs) for people who want some cost protection.  The ACA explicitly allowed for Cost Sharing Ministries as an exception to the individual mandate.  These ministries were small at the time but have gotten larger as both a means of avoiding the ACA as an ideological committment and more often, as a means of getting some cost protection at a lower monthly output than an ACA plan would cost for someone who is not subsidy eligible.

I want to highlight one of the more useful chunks I’ve written — we were writing about silverloading and ACA plan affordability but broadened our perspective a bit here:

Given continued affordability challenges, particularly for unsubsidized enrollees, states are pursuing additional policy changes. States have three primary options for reducing premiums for households ineligible for federal APTCs: direct subsidization, indirect subsidization, and endorsement of parallel markets….

states can facilitate parallel markets for insurance or insurance-like products. Short-term limited-duration plans and association health plans30 are examples of non-ACA-compliant insurance that enlarge parallel underwritten markets.31 Farm Bureau plans in Kansas, Iowa, and Tennessee are insurance-like products that avoid insurance regulations. Finally, health care sharing ministries are unregulated organizations that facilitate the sharing of health care costs among members who have common religious or ethical beliefs, but their products may offer limited financial benefits and contain coverage exclusions for people with preexisting conditions.

 

There are a few different types of parallel market products that all have slightly different characteristics.

 

Allowed to Underwrite & Price on Health Risk Allowed to Prospectively Deny Coverage in part or in full Issuer bears claims cost risk Explicitly Regulated as an Insurance Product
ACA Qualified Health Plans No No Yes Yes
Short Term Limited Duration Plans Yes Yes Yes Yes
Farm Bureau Plans Yes Yes Yes No
Cost Sharing Ministries Yes Yes No No

Cost-sharing ministries are explicitly not insurance and they are lightly regulated by states with general fraud/consumer protections the usual avenue of regulation.  They are the Wild West of  health insurance like products.  Some may be good, some may be horrendous, but there is no guarantee from even the “best” that comprehensive care for a major medical event will be paid in full.

The short term limited duration plans and Farm Bureau “NOT INSURANCE” insurance plans are insurance or insurance like products.  These products get better premiums for the people that buy the plans because they are actively cherry picking individuals with low risk of having big claims.  Some plans may not renew coverage for the next contract period if someone has a huge claim that is likely to repeat.  However, in the context of the ACA before the ARA where people earning above 400% FPL  were facing the full premium on their own, there is a good amount of value here for relatively healthy people who prospectively know that they are likely to remain relatively healthy and can’t afford a mortgage payment for health insurance coverage while having the option of the ACA to protect them against next period reclassification risk.

With the passage of the ARA enhanced subsidies, the value proposition for new buyers for these parrallel market plans is far worse than it was in 2020 as ACA plans are likely to be more affordable.  However, people who currently are covered by these plans may, very reasonably, not want to pay the transaction and hassle costs of switch or take on the policy risk that the extended subsidies aren’t renewed and thus stay in their current options.

Texas recently approved a Farm Bureau not insurance pseudo insurance option:

#HB3924 by @TomOliverson allows Texas Farm Bureau or affiliate to offer nonprofit agricultural organization health benefits in the state.

Read more about that bill here: https://t.co/3bOEWG9h7K

— Texas House Republican Caucus (@TXGOPCaucus) May 13, 2021

And as long as the Texas Farm Bureau is not a bottom feeding scum bag (which given that they have a reputation for several other lines of business to give a damn about, they have a reason to care about their perception of quality and fairness) this is no big deal. It is likely to be attractive to some individuals of relatively low risk and middle and upper middle class income but those folks historically have not gotten a good deal on the ACA due to the combination of age rating and the fairly rapid shut-off of ACA subsidies. Even with the ARA subsidies, it is not hard to imagine a decent Farm Bureau plan being priced below 8.5% of income for a double income, no kid couple in their late 40s or early 50s.

If our objective is to get people covered, then well disclosed and clear and fairly comprehensive non-ACA QHP products can have a place in the policy portfolio. I have a hard time seeing most of the cost-sharing ministries hitting the fairly comprehensive guardrail but the Farm Bureaus and some of the short term plans can and do hit those guard rails. And the secondary effects of slightly increasing the morbidity of the ACA risk pool is almost irrelevant to anyone who is not a deficit peacock.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Wednesday Morning Open Thread: I Enthusiastically Second These Suggestions
Next Post: Things Can be Terrible and Boring at the Same Time »

Reader Interactions

19Comments

  1. 1.

    Barry

    June 9, 2021 at 9:18 am

    David: “And as long as the Texas Farm Bureau is not a bottom feeding scum bag (which given that they have a reputation for several other lines of business to give a damn about, they have a reason to care about their perception of quality and fairness) this is no big deal. ”

    I no longer believe such things:

    1) Organizations tend to loven those sweet marginal gains.
    2) I believe that low-information people simply don’t know that Org A is committing nasty things in line of business A1, when they are buying A2-An.

  2. 2.

    sab

    June 9, 2021 at 9:28 am

    @Barry: You are assuming that they are low information. David’s post suggests that for some it might be a good buy.

    Brand names do matter. I bought major medical insurance back in 1972 when being female was a pre-existing condition. The company immediately started raising the deductible and the premium to the point where it made no financial sense to carry it. I remember to this day which insurance company it was and they have never jad my business since.

  3. 3.

    Barry

    June 9, 2021 at 9:32 am

    @sab: “I remember to this day which insurance company it was and they have never jad my business since.”

     

    Which they don’t mind, because they avoided massive losses.

     

    Who else did you persuade to not deal with them?

  4. 4.

    sab

    June 9, 2021 at 9:35 am

    What massive losses? I didn’t have a major medical expense for the next thirty years. My whole extended family, including my parents’ plan d.

  5. 5.

    Barry

    June 9, 2021 at 9:42 am

    @sab:  The point is that raising the deuctible like mad is a way of getting rid of somebody that the company *wants* to get rid of.

  6. 6.

    eclare

    June 9, 2021 at 9:46 am

    Thank you for this, very informative.

  7. 7.

    La Nonna

    June 9, 2021 at 10:17 am

    Really, every time I read one of these  “medical insurance” posts, I remind myself that the US, one of the richest countries in the world, has convinced their own population that a third party needs to be between you and your medical care, an abomination.  Once we realized that so-called Medicare would eat up around 25% of our not-so-generous Social Security pensions, including parts ABCDEFG or whatever, the decision to emigrate became even more appealing.  Happy to pay income taxes here in Italy to help fund universal healthcare, an EU human right, the total tax in both countries we file to is less than the “Medicare” burden would have been.  All of our care is and has been covered, including some very expensive pharmaceuticals, continuing cancer treatments, some surgeries, and a broken wrist, and legal residence is all that is required.  No such thing as a medical bankruptcy here.  Americans put up with a lot.

  8. 8.

    dnfree

    June 9, 2021 at 10:23 am

    @Barry: the company evidently wanted to get rid of females, since they get pregnant and stuff like that.

  9. 9.

    Omnes Omnibus

    June 9, 2021 at 10:52 am

    @La Nonna: Not knocking universal healthcare or European levels of taxation, but isn’t Italy rife with tax evasion?​

  10. 10.

    Steve in the ATL

    June 9, 2021 at 10:58 am

    @sab: back in my heavy litigation days in the ’90’s I had to deal with certain insurance companies and their lawyers. Over 20 years later I still won’t give any business of any kind to any entity associated with State Farm, Allstate, or Georgia Farm Bureau, nor does anyone in my family.

    I can carry a grudge too, and I’m not even Irish!

  11. 11.

    Omnes Omnibus

    June 9, 2021 at 11:02 am

    @Steve in the ATL: One of my friends in law school always said (jokingly?) that he went to law school so that he could sue State farm over something/anything.

  12. 12.

    Steve in the ATL

    June 9, 2021 at 11:04 am

    @Omnes Omnibus: perhaps a joke that turned out to be true.  Isn’t that a sitcom trope?

  13. 13.

    Almost Retired

    June 9, 2021 at 11:46 am

    @Omnes Omnibus:  I started my legal career as a very small cog in a giant wheel:  A gender discrimination class action against State Farm.  Out of roughly 1000 State Farm agents in California at the time, there were only three women (late ’70s, early 80’s).  All, basically, Lurleen Wallace-types who inherited their husband’s agency in some rural area.  My hatred for them lingers….

  14. 14.

    Another Scott

    June 9, 2021 at 11:53 am

    @Steve in the ATL:

    WARNING – Timesink Alert!!

    Obligatory TVTropes – Disproportionate Retribution:

    In some situations, it makes sense to let the opponent know that if they so much as sneeze on someone you protect, it will cost them a limb. If you have tried an eye for an eye and it really didn’t do anything except help sell eyepatches, the only way to stay alive is to be drastic. Pay back any offense tenfold, or even a hundredfold if necessary, until the survivors learn to stay away. It’s a common tactic of militaries the world over, with some regimes (such as Nazi Germany) being infamous for it.

    That said, the “Justice” these rivals have in mind is more akin to a brutal beatdown… well, most of the time it is an actual brutal No-Holds-Barred Beatdown, supposed to culminate in the receiver’s humiliation or death. Any attempt to get them to see the (all too obvious) truth, show mercy, or realize they’re a step away from utterly ruining the receiver’s life/committing murder will never succeed. It invariably takes the hero beating the rival, be it in a Cooking Duel or Good Old Fisticuffs, and proving Right Makes Might for the poor deluded soul to realize they were wrong all along, sometimes even coming around and realizing that Defeat Means Friendship.

    […]

    (See original for embedded links.)

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  15. 15.

    Barbara

    June 9, 2021 at 12:08 pm

    I was just going to write that the health care sharing ministries are MEWAs for the new millennium.  Most MEWAs were — and for all I know still are — not much better than pyramid schemes for the self-employed and very small businesses desperate to reduce the cost of health insurance.  The organizers skim money off the top while they can.  I had a regulated insurer client who was from time to time strong armed by various state regulators to conduct a special open enrollment for the customers of MEWAs that basically stopped functioning and left them without any insurance at all.  This is the part of it you don’t see.  State regulators who smirk about their business friendly regulations and then try to bully regulated insurers to cover for them when state residents end up being harmed.

    Regarding the earlier post, even if I had $75K in the bank, I wouldn’t get surgery without knowing in advance that I had insurance coverage because, you know, complications.  Not that I blame this lady directly.  She probably thought she would be protected by all the various consumer protections that have been erected over the last two decades, including pre-existing condition prohibitions and a robust external review process for denied claims. Oops — those only apply to regulated entities.

    Imagine if the world were like this: You can pay a toll for good roads without potholes with divided lanes and good lighting.  Or you can drive on roads where there are no rules at all, including rules against drunk driving or unlicensed and uninsured drivers.  There is a good reason we don’t want to live like this, but it does not seem to penetrate the brains of a lot of politicians that this might also be true for the sale of insurance.

  16. 16.

    La Nonna

    June 9, 2021 at 12:42 pm

    @Omnes Omnibus: 
    Not on my part, but it seems as though the IRS is no better than the Guardia di Finanza.

  17. 17.

    Mousebumples

    June 9, 2021 at 1:09 pm

    With my work for a PBM, we have one cost sharing ministry client. We approve or deny requests for cost sharing help based on criteria. My understanding is that the plan has a preset amount of money available to help cover costs for all members per year, and when that money is gone, it’s gone.

    I’m not on the finance side at all, but from a member’s perspective seems more reasonable as a young and healthy person versus as a now late 30s individual with higher actuarial health risks.

  18. 18.

    WhatsMyNym

    June 9, 2021 at 1:19 pm

    @La Nonna:   It sounds like you are just taking advantage of their system, tell me if I’m incorrect.

    The free appointments and limited copays are thanks to how the Italian healthcare system is funded. The system is primarily financed through a payroll tax system. A tax of 10.6% is applied to the first €20,660 of income. The rate drops to 4.6% for income between €20,51 and €77,480. The system is also financed through federal and regional general taxation, like income tax and value-added taxes on goods and services. Between 1995 and 2003, healthcare spending rose by 68% in Italy. Currently, the country struggles with how they will further fund programs to care for their rapidly aging population.

    I would expect things to change in the future to cover the increasing costs of their citizens.

  19. 19.

    StringOnAStick

    June 9, 2021 at 1:21 pm

    @La Nonna: An Italian I made friends with while on an extended trip there told me everyone hides half their income but taxes are twice as high as they should be, so it all works out!  Definitely a kind of logic at work there.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Image by MomSense (5/21.25)

Recent Comments

  • persistentillusion on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: An Exemplar for Our Global Embarrassment (May 21, 2025 @ 8:50pm)
  • Chetan Murthy on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: An Exemplar for Our Global Embarrassment (May 21, 2025 @ 8:47pm)
  • Steve LaBonne on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: An Exemplar for Our Global Embarrassment (May 21, 2025 @ 8:45pm)
  • Ruckus on Parsing the Pandemic Pause (May 21, 2025 @ 8:45pm)
  • Steve LaBonne on Wednesday Evening Open Thread: An Exemplar for Our Global Embarrassment (May 21, 2025 @ 8:44pm)

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
War in Ukraine
Donate to Razom for Ukraine

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Meetups

Upcoming Ohio Meetup May 17
5/11 Post about the May 17 Ohio Meetup

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Hands Off! – Denver, San Diego & Austin

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

PA Supreme Court At Risk

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!