• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The words do not have to be perfect.

They love authoritarianism, but only when they get to be the authoritarians.

When I was faster i was always behind.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Fear or fury? The choice is ours.

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

My right to basic bodily autonomy is not on the table. that’s the new deal.

Every decision we make has lots of baggage with it, known or unknown.

Technically true, but collectively nonsense

Everybody saw this coming.

JFC, are there no editors left at that goddamn rag?

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

Republicans do not trust women.

They were going to turn on one another at some point. It was inevitable.

He wakes up lying, and he lies all day.

Someone should tell Republicans that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, or possibly the first.

The Giant Orange Man Baby is having a bad day.

When you’re a Republican, they let you do it.

I’m starting to think Jesus may have made a mistake saving people with no questions asked.

You know it’s bad when the Project 2025 people have to create training videos on “How To Be Normal”.

So it was an October Surprise A Day, like an Advent calendar but for crime.

The republican caucus is covering themselves with something, and it is not glory.

Mobile Menu

  • Seattle Meet-up Post
  • 2025 Activism
  • Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • COVID-19
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / Georgia Access Model, public sector outreach and research impact

Georgia Access Model, public sector outreach and research impact

by David Anderson|  August 15, 20228:30 am| 31 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

Georgia wanted to shut down Healthcare.gov.  It did not want to replace Healthcare.gov with a State Based Marketplace like how California or Idaho, for example, implement their ACA individual market.  Instead, Georgia had a waiver, called the Georgia Access Model, approved during the end of the Trump Administration that would place all of the outreach, assistance, plan display and enrollment activity in the hands of profit seeking entities including insurance agents and insurance companies.  Georgia contended that the profit motive would be sufficient to drive enrollment up in plans that are at least as good in terms of benefits and premiums  at no greater cost to the federal government.  The Trump Administration bought this argument.  The Biden Administration thought it was suspect, so after the passage of the American Rescue Plan, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) asked for more information and had an extended public comment period.  I wrote and submitted a very long comment.  I also referenced a working paper that my colleagues and I had written that was relevant to the request for comments.

CMS sent a notice to Georgia suspending the waiver while requesting more data in April 2022.    Georgia responded at the end of July without any new analysis.  Last week, CMS suspended the implementation of the Georgia Access Model for 2023.

 the Departments are upholding their determinations that: (1) the State materially failed to comply with the STCs by repeatedly refusing to provide the Departments with the information requested as part of the Departments’ monitoring and oversight authority;8 and (2) the State has not demonstrated that the Georgia waiver, with the Georgia Access Model in place and absent corrective action, meets the statutory coverage guardrail in light of changes in federal law, policy, and other circumstances that materially affect the without-waiver baseline scenario. In addition to these findings, the Departments have also determined, based on readiness reviews conducted to date, that Georgia has not satisfied certain operational readiness requirements for a novel state program such as the Georgia Access Model.  Nor has the State provided an adequate outreach and communications plan. These operational and planning deficiencies are an additional basis for suspending implementation of the Georgia Access Model under the applicable STCs. For all of these reasons, suspension of the implementation of the Georgia Access Model will go into effect August 9, 2022.

Now, I get to read some interesting, to me and a few co-authors, analysis by CMS on Georgia’s argument about advertising starting on Page 8:

The State also claims that Acumen’s analysis makes erroneous assumptions about advertising. First, the State disagrees with the assumption that private entities will not change their marketing and outreach in response to the Georgia Access Model. The State asserts that the Acumen analysis ignores the Departments’ previous conclusion that private brokers will have a “greater incentive to invest in marketing and outreach in order to retain existing enrollees and attract new consumers to the individual market….”

Further, the advertising assumptions in the Acumen analysis are reasonable and supportable based on consideration of available literature on how public- vs. private-sponsored advertising levels change in response to market share. Recent research that has been published since initial approval of the waiver highlights that reductions in federal spending on advertising and outreach are not necessarily offset by increases in private spending on advertising.31,32

And now let’s look at the footnotes here:

31 Myerson et al. (2022) find that funding cuts to the Navigator program between 2017 and 2019 were not associated with changes in the number of private sector TV advertisements aired targeting marketplace health insurance. The authors conclude that private sector entities did not increase their advertising to compensate for reductions in federal spending on Navigator activity. See Myerson R, Anderson D, Baum L, et al. Association of funding cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program with Privately Sponsored Television Advertising. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(8):e2224651. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2794812. For the pre-publication version see: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uoQt0PeplBjNrxrtBS2OFGoGHpzYhajs/view. 32 Shafer et al. (2021) find that Marketplace insurers generally do not replace 1-for-1 the decline in federalsponsored advertising. The authors concluded that insurers instead behave in ways that benefit themselves strategically, advertising more when becoming a monopolist but not filling the gap left by former competitors. See Shafer P, Anderson D, Baum L, et al. Changes in Marketplace Competition and Television Advertising by Insurers. American Journal of Managed Care. 2021;27(8):323-328. https://www.ajmc.com/view/changes-in-marketplacecompetition-and-television-advertising-by-insurers. 33 See Aizawa N and Kim YS. Public and Private Provision of Information in Market-Based Public Programs: Evidence from Advertising in Health Insurance Marketplaces. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Revised April 2021. https://www.nber.org/papers/w27695. 34 See Shafer P, Anderson D, Aquino S, et al. Competing public and private television advertising campaigns and Marketplace enrollment for 2015 to 2018. RSF. 2020;6(2):85-112. https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/6/2/85.

Three papers that I’ve co-authored with a great set of colleagues are being used here. The oldest paper, published in the Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences attempts to estimate the enrollment effect of various forms of advertising. We found slight increases in enrollment with state funded advertising but nothing regarding federal or privately funded advertising. This paper has significant endogeneity concerns.

The next paper came out in the American Journal of Managed Care as we asked the question of how do insurers change advertising when insurers face different competitive environments? We used the same data set as the Russell Sage paper. We thought that insurers in counties that became less competitive could plausibly increase advertising to grow enrollment or decrease advertising to contain costs while insurers in regions that had an introduction of more competition could plausibly advertise more to defend market share. We found that a sole surviving insurer from a previously competitive region increased advertising while all other transitions saw a drop in advertising.

Finally, our most recent work led by Dr. Rebecca Myerson and published by JAMA Network Open asked if insurers substituted more advertising for less federally funded navigator support. We found robust null results in all primary and alternative specifications.  Insurers had no advertising reaction to a loss of navigator funding.

This line of research has shown that insurers are not particularly policy sensitive in their advertising decisions and that privately sponsored advertising is more likely focused on market share rather than market size.  The first two papers were conceived well before Georgia filed its first waiver.  The most recent paper had a slow origin. In Fall 2020, I sat in on a presentation at a virtual conference (APPAM) by Dr. Myerson on some of her other ongoing work on ACA navigators. Her team found that counties with a lot of navigators were able to enroll more marginalized populations than counties with few navigators. I was fascinated by how they did their identification and causal inference strategy and filed the nugget in my head for the next six months when I next chatted with Dr. Shafer. We routinely work and write together and one project was coming to an end. We were brainstorming for new ideas and something about advertising and enrollment and navigators kept on coming up, so I suggested that we take Myerson’s right hand side and replace her left hand side with advertising. And this paper emerged from that round of beers. And now these papers are having national policy impact.

That counts as a WOW!

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Monday Morning Open Thread: Supporting Our President
Next Post: So Crude and Feckless »

Reader Interactions

31Comments

  1. 1.

    eclare

    August 15, 2022 at 8:46 am

    Yay!  Great work, thank you!

  2. 2.

    Fraud Guy

    August 15, 2022 at 8:47 am

    Congratulations on making that difference!

  3. 3.

    Baud

    August 15, 2022 at 8:52 am

    Nice, man.

  4. 4.

    JPL

    August 15, 2022 at 8:55 am

    Kemp’s avoidance has cost the state $31 million and counting.   Thanks, David for your valuable research in ending this practice.

  5. 5.

    satby

    August 15, 2022 at 8:55 am

    Well done to all of you! You may have saved lives by keeping Georgia on the ACA.

  6. 6.

    Another Scott

    August 15, 2022 at 9:00 am

    You’re an example of how public policy research works best.  It’s making policy and people’s lives better in real time.  It’s great to see.

    Thanks for all you do.  It’s important.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  7. 7.

    Matt Smith

    August 15, 2022 at 9:21 am

    Congrats! Not every day that people see their work picked up this way, where you can really see its influence.

  8. 8.

    Rusty

    August 15, 2022 at 9:24 am

    I am grateful for your work and all your efforts to apply analysis to provide healthcare in an effective way to our fellow citizens across this country.  Thank you (and you should feel appropriately chuffed when your work makes an obvious difference!).

  9. 9.

    Bill K

    August 15, 2022 at 9:27 am

    I’m glad to see actually facts and studies used to make a decision affecting millions of people.  That is not how Georgia is currently operating.  There method is simply based on Obamacare = bad/Free Market Healthcare = good.  Starting with this conclusion they then worked backwards twisting some data to fit the conclusion.  Seeing your well-researched analysis will not change their minds because it doesn’t fit their conclusion.

  10. 10.

    mali muso

    August 15, 2022 at 9:28 am

    Real world impact!  That is very exciting.  Congrats!

  11. 11.

    stinger

    August 15, 2022 at 9:39 am

    So glad you do what you do, David!

    My reaction is along the lines of Bill K’s: Nobody at Georgia did any research to see if their freemarketforprofit BS would actually result in improved health for Georgians. It’s all based on improved bottom lines for “entities” and their owners.

    Stacey Abrams for GA Governor

  12. 12.

    CaseyL

    August 15, 2022 at 9:45 am

    Impressive, and well earned!  Congrats!

  13. 13.

    Lobo

    August 15, 2022 at 10:44 am

    Congrats!  Change often happens in the trenches not the tweets.

  14. 14.

    lowtechcyclist

    August 15, 2022 at 10:50 am

    That is so cool that your work is making a real-world difference like that.  Great work, David!

  15. 15.

    Tom Levenson

    August 15, 2022 at 11:03 am

    Very cool. Congrats, David.

  16. 16.

    Layer8Problem

    August 15, 2022 at 11:13 am

    I’ll repeat Another Scott’s cheers for this!  We need this kind of work.

  17. 17.

    WaterGirl

    August 15, 2022 at 12:10 pm

    This is a big Joe Biden deal.

    *I bet that Richard Mayhew guy is eating his heart out at your success, when he is almost never heard from at all anymore. :-)

  18. 18.

    dnfree

    August 15, 2022 at 12:31 pm

    Awesome!  You aren’t “just” doing research; you’re looking for opportunities to make a difference.

    And secondarily, why is it that “free market” proponents have such faith in results that aren’t seen in practice?  It is like a religion.

  19. 19.

    Chief Oshkosh

    August 15, 2022 at 12:38 pm

    Congratulations, David, and thank you for putting in the work. I guess putting in the work is not on the agenda for the State of Georgia. Thank God for tender mercies.

  20. 20.

    Steve in the ATL

    August 15, 2022 at 12:42 pm

    Fantastic!  And thanks for helping out us poor Georgians who are saddled with a truly awful state government.

    In addition, go Dawgs!

  21. 21.

    West of the Rockies

    August 15, 2022 at 12:44 pm

    @JPL:

    Well, Dog forbid Republicans admit

    Democrats have getter ideas.

  22. 22.

    StringOnAStick

    August 15, 2022 at 12:52 pm

    Hopefully knowing what a difference your work made in this case will help ease the pain of the PhD process!  You made a difference!

  23. 23.

    delphinium

    August 15, 2022 at 12:52 pm

    Congrats-wonderful work!

  24. 24.

    Dan B

    August 15, 2022 at 1:17 pm

    The belief that the free market and unchecked competition are always better seems tied to the desire to have winners and lovers, although it would be described as “efficiency”.  Free ride is another aspect of the dogma.  It assumes that the free market will prevent free riders but I’d guess that it just shifts the free riders to those with power from those who would benefit from an extended helping hand.

    Thanks for blowng holes in the smoke screen.

  25. 25.

    WereBear

    August 15, 2022 at 1:38 pm

    Thanks for the science.😁

  26. 26.

    David Fud

    August 15, 2022 at 1:40 pm

    Congratulations on having such an incredible impact – and a big thank you from the state in which I reside.  Not too many academics get to point to these sorts of outcomes, as you very well know.  I hope that you are well-recognized amongst your peers as an effective researcher.

    Most academics will only ever add a brick in the wall; you have impacted national and state policy.  Cheers!

  27. 27.

    Jim Bales

    August 15, 2022 at 2:11 pm

    Nicely done!

  28. 28.

    Chief Oshkosh

    August 15, 2022 at 2:26 pm

    @Dan B:

    tied to the desire to have winners and lovers,

    Uh…yes please?

  29. 29.

    Edmund Dantes

    August 15, 2022 at 3:04 pm

    Excellent work

  30. 30.

    Yutsano

    August 15, 2022 at 3:11 pm

    LITTLE PEEPS MAYHEW!!!

  31. 31.

    stinger

    August 15, 2022 at 4:53 pm

    @Chief Oshkosh: I’m loving the typos/autofill errors in this thread!

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - BarcaChicago  - Off the Gunflint Trail/Boundary Waters 6
Image by BarcaChicago (7/7/25)

World Central Kitchen

Donate

Recent Comments

  • p.a. on Tubas & Trombones for Peace (Open Thread) (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:05am)
  • PJ on On The Road – mayim – Digging out Dad’s work (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:05am)
  • Professor Bigfoot on Tubas & Trombones for Peace (Open Thread) (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:04am)
  • H.E.Wolf on Tubas & Trombones for Peace (Open Thread) (Jul 8, 2025 @ 11:03am)
  • Almost Retired on Tubas & Trombones for Peace (Open Thread) (Jul 8, 2025 @ 10:58am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!