• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

I desperately hope that, yet again, i am wrong.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

This isn’t Democrats spending madly. This is government catching up.

Trump’s cabinet: like a magic 8 ball that only gives wrong answers.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

Prediction: the gop will rethink its strategy of boycotting future committees.

You come for women, you’re gonna get your ass kicked.

How stupid are these people?

We know you aren’t a Democrat but since you seem confused let me help you.

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

If a good thing happens for a bad reason, it’s still a good thing.

There are no moderate republicans – only extremists and cowards.

Oh FFS you might as well trust a 6-year-old with a flamethrower.

Jack Smith: “Why did you start campaigning in the middle of my investigation?!”

Many life forms that would benefit from greater intelligence, sadly, do not have it.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

This year has been the longest three days of putin’s life.

Books are my comfort food!

She burned that motherfucker down, and I am so here for it. Thank you, Caroline Kennedy.

Imperialist aggressors must be defeated, or the whole world loses.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

The fundamental promise of conservatism all over the world is a return to an idealized past that never existed.

The current Supreme Court is a dangerous, rogue court.

Washington Post Catch and Kill, not noticeably better than the Enquirer’s.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Anderson On Health Insurance / The value of assistance on the ACA marketplaces?

The value of assistance on the ACA marketplaces?

by David Anderson|  August 26, 20229:29 am| 5 Comments

This post is in: Anderson On Health Insurance

FacebookTweetEmail

A recent paper in the American Journal of Managed Care led by Vicki Fung estimated the distribution of ARPA subsidies by income bracket for off-exchange buyers.  Their top line finding was the benefits of subsidizing households over 400% FPL were wildly dispersed:

The median annual PTC in 2021 for eligible off-marketplace enrollees was $311 but varied greatly by age, family or individual plan, and household income (5%-95% range, $0-$14,836).

However there was a secondary finding that has been bugging me since I read the paper:

69% of people off Exchange did not know that they had to be on-Exchange to get subsidies while 51% had received help from brokers.
We know that choosing health insurance in the ACA’s marketplaces and other American individual choice markets (Medicare Advantage, Medicare Part D, Medicaid managed care etc) is challenging.  People routinely make expensive choice errors that are fairly persistent.  We know that the program knowledge elements are both costly and obscure.  We also have a huge industry of assistors who are supposed to have the ability to acquire that costly detailed knowledge and then translate it, for  a fee, to people who are rationally ignorant of the details.  In the insurance industry, we call those people brokers and agents.

When I was looking at dominated plan choices with Petra Rasmussen, we found that people who got help versus those who did not barely had any difference (unadjusted) in picking a dominated plan. Picking a dominated plan is wicked expensive and objectively an inferior choice relative to picking a non-dominated plan. This is a clear choice error. It is an error that a broker or an agent should never advise. Yet, it happened fairly frequently. I question the effectiveness of help in this choice space.

The new finding by Fung implies that least ~40% (69%-(1-51%))/51%) of the people who received broker help were not aware of a critical programmatic fact — subsidies were only available to people who bought plans categorized as “on-Exchange” instead of “off-exchange”. This is an important fact as buying on-Exchange for people who estimate that they are likely but not certainly going to earn too much money to qualify for subsidies means they are giving up a nearly free option for subsidies that gets triggered if they modestly overestimated their income. Now this case does not apply to everyone who buys non-subsidized, off-exchange coverage. A consultant making 1900% FPL with a 500% FPL termination clause in their contract could remain rationally ignorant of this fact even if they are being advised by a broker.

This sub-finding is making me go “hmmmm” even more on the quality and value of assistance on plan choice.

 

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Squishable Friday Open Thread
Next Post: Open Thread: You Go, Joe! »

Reader Interactions

5Comments

  1. 1.

    Wapiti

    August 26, 2022 at 10:03 am

    If a broker or agent is recommending a clear error, one assumes they have their reasons. Though it could be lack of training. Or blindness to the needs of people not like themselves, I guess.

    Interesting (irritating) problem. My solution is always more government involvement.

  2. 2.

    Another Scott

    August 26, 2022 at 10:25 am

    Getting/giving bad recommendations seems to be a common feature of human systems. Not to hijack the thread, but I’m reminded of the mailers that I would get from SallyMae about consolidating my 4 college loans. It sounded like a no brainer to do so, but it actually would have (unsurprisingly in hindsight) cost me much more over the long term. I didn’t.

    Follow the money. People in the system respond to incentives. If companies make more money with complex, convoluted, confusing systems, then that’s what the system will be without action by outside parties (regulators, etc.). Even people of good will who want to do the best job have limited time to fight with a convoluted system.

    Thanks for all you do.

    Cheers,
    Scott.

  3. 3.

    gene108

    August 26, 2022 at 10:31 am

    My experience in working with brokers, when I did corporate HR, is they have a limited scope of knowledge based on the insurance companies they normally work with.

    Maybe the same thing applies to advice on individual markets? They know a few plans well, but not everything that’s available.

  4. 4.

    Brachiator

    August 26, 2022 at 10:49 am

    Hmm.

    Conversely, more than half of those with incomes above 400% FPL in this study receive no tax credits under ARPA. Broad messaging that highlights the generous PTCs could falsely raise expectations in this group, lead to backlash, and discourage some from engaging in future efforts aimed at improving premium affordability.

    So, it is almost a coin toss as to the value of taking time to try to get subsidies. Maybe some of these people looked and got no relief in the past and assume no relief later.

    Also, since many people get insurance through an employer, why we’re these people off market place?

    Also, many of these people appear to have modest incomes, if I am reading the report correctly. Why would they be going to an insurance broker in the first place?

    Were these people receiving any mail about insurance plans that qualify for credits?

  5. 5.

    Feathers

    August 26, 2022 at 11:35 am

    One of the difficulties I had in working with the people giving assistance is that they wanted all my info up front and then they would tell me what was available. My issue is that many of my variables were flexible. I had savings which would put me on the edge of not qualifying for a subsidy, but that was because I was saving to go back to school. I could juggle my start date and do a prepayment to the university of my tuition to make sure I stayed under the asset requirement. Also, I was temping and doing freelance writing, so my income was going to be variable.

    So what I needed was to know what the requirements for the various programs were, so I could see where I best fit. But no one would effin just be honest with me so I could make decisions. Also, there didn’t seem to be anything that took into account what you are paying in rent. The asset levels they require certainly don’t give you the key money to move someplace cheaper.

    ETA It seemed that they just had a calculator, not a sense of the moving parts.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - dmkingto - SF Bay Area Scenes 7
Image by dmkingto (7/31/25)
Donate

Recent Comments

  • Geminid on Tuesday Night Open Thread (Jul 16, 2025 @ 6:47am)
  • stinger on On The Road – Elma – Japan and Cruising the Pacific to LA Part 2 (Jul 16, 2025 @ 6:42am)
  • Martin on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 6:15am)
  • Matt McIrvin on On The Road – Elma – Japan and Cruising the Pacific to LA Part 2 (Jul 16, 2025 @ 6:13am)
  • p.a on Covid & Other Plagues Update (Jul 16, 2025 @ 6:07am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
No Kings Protests June 14 2025

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)
Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix

Keeping Track

Legal Challenges (Lawfare)
Republicans Fleeing Town Halls (TPM)
21 Letters (to Borrow or Steal)
Search Donations from a Brand

Feeling Defeated?  If We Give Up, It's Game Over

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!