• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

The “burn-it-down” people are good with that until they become part of the kindling.

This has so much WTF written all over it that it is hard to comprehend.

I’d like to think you all would remain faithful to me if i ever tried to have some of you killed.

Let me eat cake. The rest of you could stand to lose some weight, frankly.

Make the republican party small enough to drown in a bathtub.

You cannot shame the shameless.

The world has changed, and neither one recognizes it.

Too often we confuse noise with substance. too often we confuse setbacks with defeat.

Wait, what?

We need to vote them all out and restore sane Democratic government.

We are builders in a constant struggle with destroyers. keep building.

The real work of an opposition party is to oppose.

They are lying in pursuit of an agenda.

They fucked up the fucking up of the fuckup!

Do not shrug your shoulders and accept the normalization of untruths.

Republicans firmly believe having an abortion is a very personal, very private decision between a woman and J.D. Vance.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Republican also-rans: four mules fighting over a turnip.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Let the trolls come, and then ignore them. that’s the worst thing you can do to a troll.

When I decide to be condescending, you won’t have to dream up a fantasy about it.

You passed on an opportunity to be offended? What are you even doing here?

So very ready.

The willow is too close to the house.

Mobile Menu

  • 4 Directions VA 2025 Raffle
  • 2025 Activism
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2025 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Foreign Affairs / Bolton Watch

Bolton Watch

by John Cole|  August 5, 200512:23 pm| 40 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs, War on Terror aka GSAVE®

FacebookTweetEmail

Via Tacitus, this AP report on the first day for John Bolton:

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton, in his debut in the U.N. Security Council, pressed Syria and Iran on Thursday to do more to stem the flow of terrorists, arms and funding into neighboring Iraq.

His comments came as the 15-nation council unanimously adopted a U.S.-drafted resolution condemning a recent surge in violence in Iraq that has killed hundreds, including Algerian diplomats, U.S. Marines and a Sunni Arab helping to draft a new Iraqi constitution.

The report also includes some harsh words from the Syrian Ambassador.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Oil for Food
Next Post: Bush’s Poll Numbers »

Reader Interactions

40Comments

  1. 1.

    croatoan

    August 5, 2005 at 1:22 pm

    Most of the foreign fighters and suicide bombers in Iraq are from Saudi Arabia and weren’t terrorists until they became radicalized by the invasion.

  2. 2.

    Stormy70

    August 5, 2005 at 1:48 pm

    He also lashed out at the media who “yield to the commercial temptation to popularize bloody bandits who are defiling the memory of those who have died.”

    “We are talking about abuse by ABC which offended many Russians — showing this interview with a terrorist,” he said.

    Russia this week banned ABC journalists from talking to officials and will not allow them to renew their media accreditation.

    I think Russia is pissed at our vaunted media.

    Bolton, I just love him. Syria needs to be smacked down.

    Fighting terrorists creates more terrorists!
    Mustn’t fight them, must quit our Western ways of freedom to make the terrorists like us better. (eyeroll)

    Remember when we invaded Afghanistan? Seems to me the Arab Street was riled up then, too. Better they radicalize and go to die in Iraq fighting our military, instead of figuring ways to get student visas and coming here to blow up our civilians.

  3. 3.

    Rick

    August 5, 2005 at 1:55 pm

    Stormy,

    You’re 100% correct, of course. But you’re casting pearls before swine, for the most part, in this blog’s comments.

    Cordially…

  4. 4.

    Stormy70

    August 5, 2005 at 2:38 pm

    But you’re casting pearls before swine, for the most part, in this blog’s comments.

    That’s OK, I’ve been deemed as the site’s dominatrix in another thread, so Whip-snap, beyotches! (I kid, I kid)

  5. 5.

    neil

    August 5, 2005 at 2:44 pm

    And now, in the post-Bolton era, Republicans think that condemnations by the UN Security Council are effective and also awesome.

  6. 6.

    Rick

    August 5, 2005 at 2:46 pm

    I playfully alluded a couple weeks ago to Ann Coulter being my dominatrix. But I can switch, with enough visual stimu…er…persuasion.

    Cordially…

  7. 7.

    BinkyBoy

    August 5, 2005 at 3:09 pm

    No, fighting terrorists would most likely have the result of a reduction in global terrorism, unfortunately, we’re not fighting terrorism, we’re invading and occupying another nation and threatening other oil rich nations.

    Oh, and I’ll take that promotion to swine, thanks.

  8. 8.

    mac Buckets

    August 5, 2005 at 3:15 pm

    And now, in the post-Bolton era, Republicans think that condemnations by the UN Security Council are effective and also awesome.

    No, we still think it’s a charade. Nothing means anything without muscle behind it.

  9. 9.

    Sigivald

    August 5, 2005 at 3:23 pm

    Oh, do tell, Binky, how should we fight terrorism without doing anything that “threatens other oil rich nations” (Saudi Arabia, Iran)?

    Please, I’m sure the DoD, State Department, the President, and the Times would all like to know (the latter if only so they could beat the former up over it).

    Then again, to claim that the Iraq business does not “fight terrorism” is an intersting one, to begin with.

  10. 10.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 3:54 pm

    You’re 100% correct, of course. But you’re casting pearls before swine, for the most part, in this blog’s comments.

    I find it awfully strange that you would use the biblical term “casting pearls before swine” to describe the correctness of killing terrorists. Jesus said to love our enemies and to turn the other cheek. The God of the Bible said “thou shalt not kill” (one of the 10 Commandments your side fights for so vehemently) and yet you think the Bible says you can kill your enemies.

    It seems to me your kind doesn’t truly believe in Jesus, God or the Bible, and is just using it for your hubristic purposes. Maybe when we stop being the policemen of the world, terrorists will go home and be normal people again. We need to stop interjecting our way of life (who are we to dictate to them, our crime rate is not much better?) upon the rest of the world and just let them be.

  11. 11.

    Dr. Weevil

    August 5, 2005 at 4:13 pm

    ‘Rome Again’ seems to be picking and choosing Bible passages to support his own beliefs. Jesus was not exactly a pacifist: “I come not to send peace, but a sword” (Matthew 10:34). When he (or ‘He’ if you prefer) healed the centurion’s servant (Matthew 8:5-13 and Luke 7:1-10) he did not tell the centurion to quit his day job, and most Christian churches have taught that a career as a soldier or policeman is permissible for Christians, unlike (e.g.) a career as a prostitute or mugger. Also, aren’t Christians obligated to ‘interject’ their own way of life around the world by trying to convert the heathens to Christianity?

  12. 12.

    Stormy70

    August 5, 2005 at 4:22 pm

    I find it awfully strange that you would use the biblical term “casting pearls before swine” to describe the correctness of killing terrorists. Jesus said to love our enemies and to turn the other cheek. The God of the Bible said “thou shalt not kill” (one of the 10 Commandments your side fights for so vehemently) and yet you think the Bible says you can kill your enemies.

    It seems to me your kind doesn’t truly believe in Jesus, God or the Bible, and is just using it for your hubristic purposes. Maybe when we stop being the policemen of the world, terrorists will go home and be normal people again. We need to stop interjecting our way of life (who are we to dictate to them, our crime rate is not much better?) upon the rest of the world and just let them be.

    I am taking a pass on this one, it is just too much for me to take on at once.

  13. 13.

    Horst Graben

    August 5, 2005 at 4:24 pm

    Rome Again:

    You are correct. Most of us white boys are the spawn of Vikings. Christianity is but a thin skin over our core: the cult of Odin, chief of the gods. Odin, a god of war, was also associated with learning, wisdom, poetry, and magic. Everything that islam is not. Unfortunately, you still cling to the myths of semetic desert dwellers (whose brains are cooked to perfection by the sun).

  14. 14.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 4:29 pm

    ‘Rome Again’ seems to be picking and choosing Bible passages to support his own beliefs. Jesus was not exactly a pacifist: “I come not to send peace, but a sword” (Matthew 10:34). When he (or ‘He’ if you prefer) healed the centurion’s servant (Matthew 8:5-13 and Luke 7:1-10) he did not tell the centurion to quit his day job, and most Christian churches have taught that a career as a soldier or policeman is permissible for Christians, unlike (e.g.) a career as a prostitute or mugger. Also, aren’t Christians obligated to ‘interject’ their own way of life around the world by trying to convert the heathens to Christianity?

    Actually, they aren’t MY beliefs, I am not a Jesus freak; but if the Christian right is going to claim Jesus and start wars, perhaps they should try to live by what their Bible says (“thou shalt not kill” is the big one they should heed).

    The fact that Jesus said he came to not bring peace but a sword should make Christians do a double-take on this character that they claim is their savior. He talks out of both sides of his mouth, but he talks mostly of pacifism. His sermon on the mount is not aggressive at all. For every aggressive passage spoken by Jesus, I can find many more that are pacifist. As for whether his followers are supposed to go around the world proclaiming his story and his name, notice he never told others to do that until after he died (somehow I think someone put those words in his mouth – then again, I’m not one who believes he rose from the dead either, but funny how before he died he was only there for the lost sheep of Israel, and after his supposed comeback from death, he wants everyone to take the message around the world). Personally I don’t think the message is consistent and, as much else in the Bible, I think it was written by fanciful men.

    But, don’t take me for a Jesus freak, because I don’t believe he either existed, or was the son of God personally.

  15. 15.

    Rick

    August 5, 2005 at 4:43 pm

    Maybe when we stop being the policemen of the world, terrorists will go home and be normal people again. We need to stop interjecting our way of life (who are we to dictate to them, our crime rate is not much better?) upon the rest of the world and just let them be.

    Rome Again,

    Kumbaya my lord, kumbaya
    Kumbaya my lord, kumbaya
    Kumbaya my lord, kumbaya
    Oh lord, kumbaya

    Someone’s singing lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s singing lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s singing lord, kumbaya
    Oh lord, kumbayah

    Someone’s laughing, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s laughing, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s laughing, lord, kumbaya
    Oh lord, kumbaya

    Someone’s crying, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s crying, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s crying, lord, kumbaya
    Oh lord, kumbaya

    Someone’s praying, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s praying, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s praying, lord, kumbaya
    Oh lord, kumbaya

    Someone’s sleeping, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s sleeping, lord, kumbaya
    Someone’s sleeping, lord, kumbaya
    Oh lord, kumbaya
    Oh lord, kumbaya

    The anthem for “your kind.” “Your kind” being the ineffective, unrealistic sort, I guess.

    Cordially…

  16. 16.

    M. Scott Eiland

    August 5, 2005 at 4:48 pm

    Maybe when we stop being the policemen of the world, terrorists will go home and be normal people again. We need to stop interjecting our way of life (who are we to dictate to them, our crime rate is not much better?) upon the rest of the world and just let them be.

    This is the kind of comment that gives sniffing glue a bad name.

  17. 17.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 4:50 pm

    The anthem for “your kind.” “Your kind” being the ineffective, unrealistic sort, I guess.

    Not my anthem, and to be quite honest, there aren’t enough people in this world who believe as I do to be called “my kind”. That’s okay, I’m not here to bring others to “my kind”, I’m just asking that Christians, who believe in a loving God but refuse to live by the tenets of their book, stop screwing around with (and torturing) people of other countries in the name of our country (which I am a citizen of).

    Carry on, I never expected you to get it, I see you didn’t.

  18. 18.

    Stormy70

    August 5, 2005 at 4:52 pm

    Actually, they aren’t MY beliefs, I am not a Jesus freak; but if the Christian right is going to claim Jesus and start wars, perhaps they should try to live by what their Bible says (“thou shalt not kill” is the big one they should heed).

    Ok, I can’t help myself. Seems like alot more that Christians are involved with the war, there is even some jews (gasp), atheists, agnostics, and Southpark -type conseratives in the mix. I know you have some religious “issues”, please refrain from accosting us with them. That is all.

  19. 19.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 4:57 pm

    This is the kind of comment that gives sniffing glue a bad name.

    I can see why you would think that, establishing the American empire around the world is so much more important than whether we are doing the right thing or not.

  20. 20.

    Stormy70

    August 5, 2005 at 4:59 pm

    You are correct. Most of us white boys are the spawn of Vikings. Christianity is but a thin skin over our core: the cult of Odin, chief of the gods. Odin, a god of war, was also associated with learning, wisdom, poetry, and magic. Everything that islam is not. Unfortunately, you still cling to the myths of semetic desert dwellers (whose brains are cooked to perfection by the sun).

    Hey, don’t leave out the white girls! I have some Viking blood in me (don’t we all? They got around!) so now I see it was Odin all along. Sneaky bastard.

  21. 21.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 5:00 pm

    Ok, I can’t help myself. Seems like alot more that Christians are involved with the war, there is even some jews (gasp), atheists, agnostics, and Southpark -type conseratives in the mix. I know you have some religious “issues”, please refrain from accosting us with them. That is all.

    It matters not who is “involved” in this war, what matters is who is prosecuting it. Who is at the helm of this war? A Christian fundamentalist who doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground, and who is getting his support from a bunch of Christian fundamentalists who want to see him win the world for Jesus. Give me a break.

  22. 22.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 5:04 pm

    Hey, don’t leave out the white girls! I have some Viking blood in me (don’t we all? They got around!) so now I see it was Odin all along. Sneaky bastard.

    Oh Stormy, isn’t it so nice to find we have something in common? Are you a member of the royal bloodline too or just some latter norsemen?

  23. 23.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 5:08 pm

    Unfortunately, you still cling to the myths of semetic desert dwellers (whose brains are cooked to perfection by the sun).

    Actually Horst, I’m not, I study a lot about Sumer and the path of “godism” but I couldn’t use examples of those examples as it would just confuse others who are clinging “to the myths of semetic desert dwellers (whose brains are cooked to perfection by the sun)”. ;)

  24. 24.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 5:11 pm

    I know you have some religious “issues”, please refrain from accosting us with them. That is all.

    Funny hearing this from a Christian, what happened when those burned at the stake said the same thing? They died at the hands of Christian church officials. Funny stuff Stormy, really hilarious.

  25. 25.

    Rick

    August 5, 2005 at 5:37 pm

    I never expected you to get it, I see you didn’t.

    I’m one lucky, lucky guy, not to get “it.” ((((SHUDDER))))

    Cordially…

  26. 26.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 5:49 pm

    I’m one lucky, lucky guy, not to get “it.” ((((SHUDDER))))

    Cordially…

    So “cordial” you are Rick. Is this the best you can do? Why not come back with some meaningful reasons why I’m wrong and you’re right?

  27. 27.

    Stormy70

    August 5, 2005 at 5:53 pm

    Actually, my father is a druid and we sacrifice a virgin at the Winter Soltice. Summer is just too dang hot. We toast marshmallows while burning them, too. Good times. We DO NOT torture them, though.

  28. 28.

    Jon

    August 5, 2005 at 5:54 pm

    A more accurate translation is:

    Thou shall not murder.

  29. 29.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 5:56 pm

    His comments came as the 15-nation council unanimously adopted a U.S.-drafted resolution condemning a recent surge in violence in Iraq that has killed hundreds, including Algerian diplomats, U.S. Marines and a Sunni Arab helping to draft a new Iraqi constitution.

    Now that Bolton is in the U.N., does this mean Christians will stop considering it the beast of Revelation? Or have they decided that the U.N. isn’t the beast anymore and moved on to another target?

  30. 30.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 5:58 pm

    Actually, my father is a druid and we sacrifice a virgin at the Winter Soltice. Summer is just too dang hot. We toast marshmallows while burning them, too. Good times. We DO NOT torture them, though.

    Now THAT was funny!

  31. 31.

    Rome Again

    August 5, 2005 at 6:07 pm

    A more accurate translation is:

    Thou shall not murder.

    What is the reason for the distinction, both end in death, with one person doing it to another… are you saying there is justification for killing that isn’t there for murder? Or am I misunderstanding the reason for your distinguishing between the two?

  32. 32.

    jg

    August 5, 2005 at 6:51 pm

    Fighting terrorists creates more terrorists!
    Mustn’t fight them, must quit our Western ways of freedom to make the terrorists like us better.

    So long as the wingnuts think this is what the left or the anti-Iraq war crowd is actually saying we can’t have a discussion. There’s no sense taling to you if thats what you’re hearing.

  33. 33.

    jg

    August 5, 2005 at 6:52 pm

    A more accurate translation is:

    Thou shall not murder.

    Give me a break! This from the side that absolutely won’t hear of ‘interpreting’ the constitution. Strict reading only but its ok to see the bible through modern eyes.
    Please.

  34. 34.

    Mike

    August 5, 2005 at 7:11 pm

    “Sigivald Says:
    Oh, do tell, Binky, how should we fight terrorism without doing anything that “threatens other oil rich nations” (Saudi Arabia, Iran)?”

    We just need to surrender.
    You know…like Spain?

  35. 35.

    Mike

    August 5, 2005 at 7:19 pm

    “Rome Again Says:

    It matters not who is “involved” in this war, what matters is who is prosecuting it. Who is at the helm of this war? A Christian fundamentalist who doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground, and who is getting his support from a bunch of Christian fundamentalists who want to see him win the world for Jesus. Give me a break.”

    You do realize Clinton was a “Christian Fundamentalist”: right? And that he was “involved” in a war (which though I didn’t vote for him, I supported). Last I heard alot lf Christian Fundamentalists wanted to see him win too…
    Oh…just so you know?
    Martin Luther King was a “Christian Fundamentalist” too.
    I think there were an awful lot of Christian Fundamentalists that wanted to see him win as well.

  36. 36.

    guinsPen

    August 5, 2005 at 8:40 pm

    the post-Bolton era

    He’s already been fired?

  37. 37.

    CaseyL

    August 5, 2005 at 9:21 pm

    Mike, you seem to have an odd idea of what Christian Fundamentalism is.

    Neither Clinton nor MLK Jr. were fundamentalists. Neither of them believed every word of the Bible was literally true.

  38. 38.

    Mike

    August 5, 2005 at 11:25 pm

    “CaseyL Says:
    Mike, you seem to have an odd idea of what Christian Fundamentalism is.

    Neither Clinton nor MLK Jr. were fundamentalists. Neither of them believed every word of the Bible was literally true.”

    And you know this because?

    I don’t really have the patience, nor do I particularly care enough to talk about this much more, but which one of the general beliefs of Christian Fundamentalists as shown here:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Christianity

    Do you think these two gentlemen disagree with? I’d wager, not much, if anything.

    Everybody thinks that being a ‘Fundamentalist Christian” means you’re also a Conservative. Does that mean there are no Liberals that believe the things shown in the article above? Of course not. The guy that founded sojourners (Jim Wallis) calls himself an Evangelical Christian.

  39. 39.

    Rome Again

    August 6, 2005 at 12:09 am

    You do realize Clinton was a “Christian Fundamentalist”: right? And that he was “involved” in a war (which though I didn’t vote for him, I supported). Last I heard alot lf Christian Fundamentalists wanted to see him win too…
    Oh…just so you know?
    Martin Luther King was a “Christian Fundamentalist” too.
    I think there were an awful lot of Christian Fundamentalists that wanted to see him win as well.

    Neither Jim Wallis, nor Clinton or MLK, Jr. tried to turn America into a theocracy. Bush IS trying to turn this country into a theocracy. These same people you mentioned also did their best to reach across the aisle and try to make friends on the other side of the fence, Bush doesn’t do that either.

  40. 40.

    Aaron Nafthali

    August 6, 2005 at 10:12 am

    Hey Rome, with all due respect –

    “Bush IS trying to turn this country into a theocracy.”

    Well, that is empirically untrue, and absurd on the face of it. I respect your right to state whatever you like, but you should understand that statements like this are not argument; they are hyperbole.

    You detract from the already-small credibility of your position.

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

Photo by OzarkHillbilly (3/4/26)

We Met Our Goal for Alaska!

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address

Recent Comments

  • Betty Cracker on “One day, he is not going to be president anymore…” (Mar 4, 2026 @ 4:28pm)
  • Geminid on “One day, he is not going to be president anymore…” (Mar 4, 2026 @ 4:27pm)
  • Chetan Murthy on “One day, he is not going to be president anymore…” (Mar 4, 2026 @ 4:25pm)
  • prostratedragon on “One day, he is not going to be president anymore…” (Mar 4, 2026 @ 4:23pm)
  • Jeffro on “One day, he is not going to be president anymore…” (Mar 4, 2026 @ 4:22pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
On Artificial Intelligence (7-part series)

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!