• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Everybody saw this coming.

Why did Dr. Oz lose? well, according to the exit polls, it’s because Fetterman won.

This blog will pay for itself.

Republicans don’t want a speaker to lead them; they want a hostage.

Impressively dumb. Congratulations.

We’ve had enough carrots to last a lifetime. break out the sticks.

And now I have baud making fun of me. this day can’t get worse.

I’ve spoken to my cat about this, but it doesn’t seem to do any good.

Authoritarian republicans are opposed to freedom for the rest of us.

Proof that we need a blogger ethics panel.

Roe isn’t about choice, it’s about freedom.

Meanwhile over at truth Social, the former president is busy confessing to crimes.

Eh, that’s media spin. biden’s health is fine and he’s doing a good job.

“Jesus paying for the sins of everyone is an insult to those who paid for their own sins.”

People are complicated. Love is not.

Republicans in disarray!

The next time the wall street journal editorial board speaks the truth will be the first.

A sufficient plurality of insane, greedy people can tank any democratic system ever devised, apparently.

Only Democrats have agency, apparently.

Accused of treason; bitches about the ratings. I am in awe.

Incompetence, fear, or corruption? why not all three?

Not so fun when the rabbit gets the gun, is it?

Battle won, war still ongoing.

Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Politics / Media / MSM Thugs

MSM Thugs

by John Cole|  February 15, 20056:33 pm| 14 Comments

This post is in: Media

FacebookTweetEmail

This seems idiotic.

I spoke to Scott Nelson, the Tulsa World Web Editor (They can be reached at (918) 583-2161), and tried to make sense of their policy, and got nowhere. I am even more confused with what they are trying to accomplish than before I called.

According to Mr. Nelson, you need written permission to print the article and must print the article in full. I responded that I didn’t want to copy a whole article, just a quote, and he said that was not allowed and would be copyright infringement. When I asked why, he said it was their policy so that things wouldn not be ‘taken out of context.’

When I asked him if things were taken out of context, then wouldn’t that be libel, and they could get legal redress that way, he waffled. I then re-stated the question, and asked him if it was the policy of the Tulsa World to threaten lawsuits for copyright infringement to prevent possible cases of libel, and he didn;t really have much of an answer.

He also said, contrary to the letter to Bates Online, that linking was allowed, which leads me to believe that Mr. Bair, the Vice-President, was perhaps a touch overzealous or using terms he was not familiar with. Who knows.

At any rate, I must add that Mr. Nelson was very polite and helped to the best of his ability, even though he sounded agitated about the whole ordeal.

I thought by calling them I would clear some things up, but I am as confused as ever.

*** Update ***

This update from BatesLine seems to suggest that the confusion of Mr. Nelson is not the result of a human failing on Mr. Nelson’s part, but the inevitable result from a confusing and untenable policy:

Just time to link this: KTUL’s website has a new story with comments from World publisher Bobby Lorton and reaction from me.

Funny: He doesn’t want me to quote the paper out of context, but he doesn’t want me to link to the whole story so people can read it in context.

Actually, it is not funny at all. Sad is what I was thinking.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « 24 Blogging
Next Post: High Comedy at the O-Dub Corral »

Reader Interactions

14Comments

  1. 1.

    Bromide

    February 15, 2005 at 7:55 pm

    I live in tulsa and I quit taking the world about 25 years ago. I can’t stand the slant and outright abuse of the privilege of being a news purveyor.

    When I was 18 and a member of the Tulsa Youth Coalition the Trib/World trashed us continually although we had people like Katy Westby contributing to our org. But the trib/world always was anti-community. That is why I won’t read it.. I would rather have the Cincy Chronicle (lol)

  2. 2.

    Toren

    February 15, 2005 at 10:56 pm

    Fair Usage Doctrine.
    You can quote and if they don’t like it, they can go pound sand with the Supreme Court.

  3. 3.

    Robin Roberts

    February 15, 2005 at 11:01 pm

    John, the reason you feel confused is because the person you talked to doesn’t have a clue what he is talking about with respect to what is and what is not copyright infringement.

    Not that that is a surprise, I saw the copy of their letter to Bates, and it is obviously not composed by any attorney competent in the issue.

  4. 4.

    Gregory Markle

    February 16, 2005 at 1:50 am

    So I suppose that, by their standards, they always quote entire statements and speeches and not just out-takes so they can assure their readership that nothing is ‘taken out of context.’

    What a tool!

  5. 5.

    S.W. Anderson

    February 16, 2005 at 2:08 am

    The Tulsa World’s position is in complete contravention of the concept of fair use, which specifically allows for reasonable quoting of portions of an article, book, poem, play, etc. It also specifically prohibits presenting most or all of a work without permission, for what should be obvious reasons.

    Being quoted out of context is a risk the World, like everyone and everything else, runs. That’s life.

  6. 6.

    Bryan C

    February 16, 2005 at 2:20 am

    I really feel sorry for Mr. Nelson. It sounds like he’s trying his best to make sense of the horrible situation his bosses have created for him.

  7. 7.

    John Cole

    February 16, 2005 at 10:12 am

    That is what I thought, Bryan.

  8. 8.

    Kimmitt

    February 16, 2005 at 11:36 am

    Yeah, you’re pretty much fine for fair use, but printing presses are free to anyone who can afford them. That is, if you can afford to fight the copyright suit (and possibly win a countersuit), you’re golden. If not, I’d say to stop quoting (or linking to) Tulsa World.

  9. 9.

    Churchie

    February 16, 2005 at 11:35 pm

    Well I dont think there will be a copyright suit because it doesnt seem like they have any ground to really stand on. Nice blog John, first time visitor. i am in tulsa, boy do i sometimes miss the great cincinnati.

  10. 10.

    Robin Roberts

    February 17, 2005 at 11:20 am

    The other clue Churchie is when someone sends a cease and desist letter that isn’t written by counsel.

  11. 11.

    TomB

    February 18, 2005 at 11:20 am

    Kimmit, what the hell are you talking about?

Comments are closed.

Trackbacks

  1. BatesLine says:
    February 17, 2005 at 12:14 am

    A conversation with the Whirled web editor

    Balloon Juice actually phoned the Tulsa World’s web editor: I spoke to Scott Nelson, the Tulsa World Web Editor (They can be reached at (918) 583-2161), and tried to make sense of their policy, and got nowhere. I am even more confused with what they ar…

  2. The Naked Green says:
    February 17, 2005 at 12:00 pm

    Tulsa World Losing

    The saga continues and Michael Bates has more about Tulsa Whirled’s utter stupidity on his blog. Tulsa World has a confusing web editor, a wacky owner and even bullies web hosts. What I can’t get over is the continual stupidity. You would think they …

  3. The Moderate Voice says:
    February 22, 2005 at 12:04 am

    Around The ‘Sphere

    Our occasional collection of links from all over Blogtopia. Links reprent varying points of view and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Moder…

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • Kent on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 5:04pm)
  • Sister Golden Bear on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 5:01pm)
  • Baud on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 5:01pm)
  • Eolirin on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 5:00pm)
  • trollhattan on It’s 2023, not 2020 (Feb 7, 2023 @ 4:59pm)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!