• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Weird. Rome has an American Pope and America has a Russian President.

The arc of the moral universe does not bend itself. it is up to us to bend it.

Balloon Juice, where there is always someone who will say you’re doing it wrong.

“woke” is the new caravan.

Dear media: perhaps we ought to let Donald Trump speak for himself!

Republicans don’t lie to be believed, they lie to be repeated.

We are aware of all internet traditions.

Whatever happens next week, the fight doesn’t end.

Today’s gop: why go just far enough when too far is right there?

The snowflake in chief appeared visibly frustrated when questioned by a reporter about egg prices.

“Perhaps I should have considered other options.” (head-desk)

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. ~Thomas Jefferson

Too often we hand the biggest microphones to the cynics and the critics who delight in declaring failure.

This is dead girl, live boy, a goat, two wetsuits and a dildo territory.  oh, and pink furry handcuffs.

Fucking consultants! (of the political variety)

Humiliatingly small and eclipsed by the derision of millions.

Usually wrong but never in doubt

Not loving this new fraud based economy.

At some point, the ability to learn is a factor of character, not IQ.

Rupert, come get your orange boy, you petrified old dinosaur turd.

T R E 4 5 O N

There are more Russians standing up to Putin than Republicans.

Every reporter and pundit should have to declare if they ever vacationed with a billionaire.

’Where will you hide, Roberts, the laws all being flat?’

Mobile Menu

  • 2026 Targeted Political Fundraising
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • 2026 Activism
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • Targeted Fundraising!
You are here: Home / Archives for 2005

Archives for 2005

Global Warming- “What’s Inuit For Me?”

by John Cole|  December 8, 20051:06 pm| 32 Comments

This post is in: Science & Technology

This will certainly make the global warming debate more interesting:

As ice caps shrink around them, Inuit activists are making an international case out of Washington’s alleged indifference to global warming. But the Bush administration is standing by its refusal to negotiate long-term limits on “greenhouse gases.”

A two-week U.N. climate conference, attended by more than 180 nations, enters its final two days Thursday with little prospect for consensus on a key item – mandatory cutbacks beyond 2012 in carbon dioxide and other emissions whose buildup in the atmosphere is expected to disrupt the global climate.

The climate is already changing in the Arctic, where an international study last year found average winter temperatures have increased as much as 7 degrees over 50 years. Permafrost is thawing, and the extent of Arctic Sea ice is shrinking, imperiling polar bears and other animals.

The warming threatens “the destruction of the hunting and food-gathering culture of the Inuit in this century,” said Paul Crowley of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference, representing 155,000 Inuit of Canada, Greenland, Russia and the United States, where they are known as Eskimos.

On Wednesday, the Inuit group submitted a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, an investigative arm of the Organization of American States in Washington, “seeking relief from violations resulting from global warming caused by acts and omissions of the United States” – the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases.

The northern natives – 63 petitioners are named from all Inuit regions – seek a declaration that their human rights are being violated, putting political pressure on the U.S. government to reduce emissions.

Looks like the global warming debate might be heating up, although these Inuits will probably get the cold shoulder***.

*** Nope. Not apologizing for that, or for the title.

Global Warming- “What’s Inuit For Me?”Post + Comments (32)

Tortured Evidence Banned In UK Courts

by John Cole|  December 8, 200511:26 am| 34 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®

Via Sullivan, I see that the UK Law Lords have banned the use of evidence gained through torture in court:

Evidence that may have been obtained by torture cannot be used against terror suspects in British courts, the House of Lords ruled today.
A panel of seven Law Lords voted unanimously to allow an appeal by eight detainees who are being held without charge on suspicion of being involved in terrorism, against a controversial Court of Appeal judgment passed in August 2004.

The appeal court voted last year that if evidence was obtained under torture by agents of another country with no involvement by the UK, it was usable and there was no obligation by the government to inquire about its origins.

But today’s ruling means such evidence is inadmissible under British law. It also means the home secretary, Charles Clarke, must re-examine all cases where evidence from abroad has been obtained by torture.

Of course, the pro-torture lobby will simply state that this is proof of my Kerryesque Frenchness, because everyone knows that we would only torture to gain information to stop the proverbial ticking time-bomb, and that this is a war and not a police effort. Tell that to Jose Padilla and John Walker Lindh and all the other known and accussed terrorists who have been or will be tried in the future.

Tortured Evidence Banned In UK CourtsPost + Comments (34)

One Bad Dude

by John Cole|  December 8, 200511:18 am| 21 Comments

This post is in: War on Terror aka GSAVE®

I am (as previous posts will show), feeling a little cantankerous and ornery today. Apparently that is going around the blogosphere, as my friend Brian Linse, normally a mild-mannered and unreconstructed pinko commie who is known to associate with unrepentant libertarians, is about as hostile as I have seen him in a long time.

I haven’t followed the issue, and will read up about it this afternoon when I have some time.

One Bad DudePost + Comments (21)

Hopes High in Afghanistan

by John Cole|  December 8, 200511:08 am| 83 Comments

This post is in: Foreign Affairs, War on Terror aka GSAVE®

Afghans are optimistic about the future, and this poll has some pretty stunning results:

Four years after the fall of the Taliban, Afghans express both vast support for the changes that have shaken their country and remarkable optimism for the future, despite the deep challenges they face in economic opportunity, security and basic services alike.

An ABC News poll in Afghanistan — the first national survey there sponsored by a news organization — underscores those challenges in a unique portrait of the lives of ordinary Afghans. Poverty is deep, medical care and other basic services lacking, and infrastructure minimal. Nearly six in 10 have no electricity in their homes, and just 3 percent have it around the clock. Seven in 10 Afghan adults have no more than an elementary education; half have no schooling whatsoever. Half have household incomes under $500 a year.

Yet despite these and other deprivations, 77 percent of Afghans say their country is headed in the right direction — compared with 30 percent in the vastly better-off United States. Ninety-one percent prefer the current Afghan government to the Taliban regime, and 87 percent call the U.S.-led overthrow of the Taliban good for their country. Osama bin Laden, for his part, is as unpopular as the Taliban; nine in 10 view him unfavorably.

The entire poll is here. The number that shocks me is the 87% supporting the US led overthrow (which places 87% of Afghan citizens firmly at odds with left-wing icon Cindy Sheehan***).

At any rate, it is difficult to tell what the polls mean, and optimism is not the same as thinking things are going well, but those who think things are going in the right direction certainly seem to be in the majority. Or then again, maybe they are just stoned on all the smack they are producing.

*** Sorry for the latest Sheehrection™. I couldn’t resist. The upside is that this gives several of you the opportunity to tell me what an awful person I am. Again.

Hopes High in AfghanistanPost + Comments (83)

Fiscal Insanity

by John Cole|  December 8, 20059:44 am| 93 Comments

This post is in: Domestic Politics, Politics, Republican Stupidity

I like tax cuts as much as the next guy, but these folks are off their damned rocker:

The House passed three separate tax cuts yesterday and plans to approve a fourth today, trimming the federal revenue by $94.5 billion over five years — nearly double the budget savings that Republicans muscled through the House last month.

GOP leaders portray the tax bills — for the hurricane-ravaged Gulf Coast, affluent investors, U.S. troops serving in Iraq and taxpayers who otherwise would be hit by the alternative minimum tax — as vital to keeping the economy rolling.

“Our economic policies have done the trick,” said Rep. Deborah Pryce (R-Ohio). “We are in the middle of one of the strongest economies this country has ever seen.”

But some budget analysts say the flourish of tax cutting badly undermines the recent shows of fiscal discipline. Last month’s budget-cutting bill would save $50 billion over five years by imposing new fees on Medicaid recipients, trimming the food stamp rolls, squeezing student lenders and cutting federal child support enforcement.

Compare and contrast these actions with this report from the notoriously left-wing Heritage Foundation:

Federal budget projections consistently warn that America faces a future of unaffordable entitlement spending, deep federal debt, and economic stagna­tion unless lawmakers modernize runaway entitle­ment programs. This paper shows that the long-term budget picture may even be substantially worse than previously projected.

Specifically, a realistic budget projection shows that combined nominal Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid spending will double over the next decade. Adding in the costs of the war on terrorism, Hurri­cane Katrina, and other congressional spending pri­orities pushes total 2015 federal spending well past $4 trillion and the budget deficit to $873 billion—a level that could lead to harmful tax increases.

The 2006–2050 budget picture is even more dis­mal. Because of the cost of fully funding Social Secu­rity, Medicare, and Medicaid, leading long-term budget projections have calculated that federal spending will increase from the current 20 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) to a peacetime high of nearly 33 percent of GDP by 2050.

Tax cuts are not one of Heritage’s proscribed solutions to this mess. Neither was a trillion dollar drug company giveaway/entitlement program, either.

It is safe to say I sometimes sit around and ask myself- “WTF did I vote for and what did I get for my vote?”

Fiscal InsanityPost + Comments (93)

Bush Rises Slightly In the Polls

by John Cole|  December 8, 20059:29 am| 10 Comments

This post is in: Politics

Bush’s poll numbers have improved slightly. I attribute it to the Barney Cam:

After months of political erosion, President Bush’s approval rating improved markedly in the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll, largely tracking Americans’ more positive attitudes toward the economy.

But his presidency is still plagued by widespread doubts about his handling of the war in Iraq, with 52 percent of poll respondents saying the Bush administration intentionally misled the public when its officials made the case for war. A majority of Americans want the United States to set some timetable for troop withdrawal; 32 percent want the number of American troops reduced, and 28 percent want a total pullout.

The survey, conducted Dec. 2-6, showed Mr. Bush’s approval rating at 40 percent, up from 35 percent a month ago, which was the low point of his presidency. His gains primarily came among men, independents, 18-to-29-year-olds and conservatives. He remains a fiercely polarizing figure, with an approval rating of 79 percent among Republicans, 12 percent among Democrats and 34 percent among independents.

Really, at some point, there is no where to go but up- especially when you were bottomed out at 35%. You can see the complete results here (.pdf), and I like that the NY Times is now attaching the complete results all the time, so I don’t have to waste time figuring out how the writers parsed the results.

Bush Rises Slightly In the PollsPost + Comments (10)

Plame Update, Rove Edition

by John Cole|  December 8, 20059:22 am| 1 Comment

This post is in: Politics

Let’s start off with Larry O, who seems to still not have recovered from his meltdown on Hardball a while back. Instead of calling him bitter or shrill, we will just say he has an ‘edge’ you folks on the left will like:

Rove’s lawyer is now an on-the-record liar. The proof: Luskin told the Washington Post the other day that if Rove escapes indictment, it won’t be “the product of my particular skill or cleverness.” Whenever prominent Washingtonians resort to humility in print, they are lying at minimum about their state of mind. Luskin’s lie runs deeper than that. The truth is Rove is not yet indicted exclusively because of his lawyer’s “particular skill.”

The Washington Post profile that provoked Luskin’s one-and-only public lie stresses how good Luskin is at both the legal complexities of criminal defense work and the much simpler but time-consuming task of spinning/using the Washington press corps. If Luskin wasn’t brilliant at both of those things, Rove would be indicted now. Luskin’s use of Viveca Novak in his last minute meeting with Patrick Fitzgerald as the first grand jury’s term was expiring is what left Fitzgerald with only one name to indict.

***

You’re the special prosecutor. You’re on the verge of indicting one of the most powerful White House aides in history on lying to the FBI and perjury. His lawyer makes a last minute pitch that really muddies your waters. At trial, the lead prosecution witness is going to be a Time reporter testifying about his conversation with the defendant. Now you learn that the lead defense witness is going to be another Time reporter testifying about her conversation with the defense lawyer. You know this is going to sound too weird for a jury to get past reasonable doubt. You don’t indict.

Instead, what Fitzgerald is doing now is getting Viveca Novak under oath to check how her story is going to sound to a jury. If Fitzgerald does not indict Rove after hearing from Novak, then it will be Viveca Novak who saves Rove. Which is to say it will be Luskin’s relationship with the press, with Viveca Novak in particular, that saved Rove. If Rove beats the rap, it will definitely be the product of Bob Luskin’s particular skill and cleverness.

Next up, the WaPo:

The CIA leak investigation returned to a more active stage yesterday as a special prosecutor presented information to a grand jury for the first time in six weeks.

Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s decision to enlist a new grand jury comes as he continues to investigate possible criminal charges against senior White House adviser Karl Rove. Rove faces possible legal consequences for not telling investigators for months that he had provided information about CIA operative Valerie Plame to Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper in July 2003.

Rove disclosed the conversation only after Cooper was subpoenaed to testify about their discussions, said sources familiar with Rove’s account. Rove maintains that he initially forgot about the contact, the sources said.

Yesterday was the first time a grand jury has met to consider the case since Oct. 28, when a previous grand jury indicted I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Vice President Cheney’s chief of staff. Fitzgerald, who arrived with four deputies, an FBI agent and boxes of files, declined to comment on the three-hour session as he left the courthouse. No witnesses were seen entering the grand jury room.

But several legal experts and sources involved in the case said Fitzgerald was probably providing the new grand jury with a primer on what has been learned in the investigation and what remains unresolved. They said the prosecutor’s move into a more active probe could spell trouble for Rove, or for other people enmeshed in more recent developments in the case.

Jane Hamsher, whose FireDogLake is beating us like a rented mule in the 2005 Weblog awards (go vote- we are in ninth place and sinking like anchor), comments.

Tom Maguire has alternate coverage of Plame related issues.

Plame Update, Rove EditionPost + Comments (1)

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 380
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

On The Road - frosty - 3rd Annual National Park/COVID Challenge - Oregon - Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area - Engineering
Photo by frosty (4/3/26)
Donate

Election Resources

Voter Registration Info – Find a State
Check Voter Registration by Address
Election Calendar by State

Targeted Fundraising Info & Links

Recent Comments

  • SpaceUnit on Late Night Open Thread (Apr 4, 2026 @ 3:29am)
  • KnowledgeOrPower on Open Thread: RETVRN (to the Religious Wars) (Apr 4, 2026 @ 3:19am)
  • Rachel Bakes on How about a (wide open) Open Thread? (Apr 4, 2026 @ 3:13am)
  • Msb on Friday Night Open Thread (Apr 4, 2026 @ 3:13am)
  • dp on Late Night Open Thread (Apr 4, 2026 @ 2:58am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Fix Nyms with Apostrophes

Outsmarting Apple iOS 26

Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup

Order Calendar A
Order Calendar B

Social Media

Balloon Juice
WaterGirl
TaMara
John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
David Anderson
Major Major Major Major
DougJ NYT Pitchbot
mistermix
Rose Judson (podcast)

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Manager

Copyright © 2026 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc