• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

  • About Us
  • Lexicon
  • Contact Us
  • Our Store
  • ↑
  • ↓
  • ←
  • →

Balloon Juice

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

Not all heroes wear capes.

This really is a full service blog.

Let us savor the impending downfall of lawless scoundrels who richly deserve the trouble barreling their way.

Wow, I can’t imagine what it was like to comment in morse code.

Within six months Twitter will be fully self-driving.

If senate republicans had any shame, they’d die of it.

Despite his magical powers, I don’t think Trump is thinking this through, to be honest.

Battle won, war still ongoing.

The republican caucus is already covering themselves with something, and it’s not glory.

In my day, never was longer.

I’m pretty sure there’s only one Jack Smith.

Speaking of republicans, is there a way for a political party to declare intellectual bankruptcy?

Something needs to be done about our bogus SCOTUS.

“Squeaker” McCarthy

Republicans seem to think life begins at the candlelight dinner the night before.

Republicans are radicals, not conservatives.

You cannot shame the shameless.

You can’t love your country only when you win.

T R E 4 5 O N

Thanks to your bullshit, we are now under siege.

Fuck these fucking interesting times.

It’s always darkest before the other shoe drops.

It’s time for the GOP to dust off that post-2012 autopsy, completely ignore it, and light the party on fire again.

Perhaps you mistook them for somebody who gives a damn.

Mobile Menu

  • Winnable House Races
  • Donate with Venmo, Zelle & PayPal
  • Site Feedback
  • War in Ukraine
  • Submit Photos to On the Road
  • Politics
  • On The Road
  • Open Threads
  • Topics
  • Balloon Juice 2023 Pet Calendar (coming soon)
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus
  • Authors
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Lexicon
  • Our Store
  • Politics
  • Open Threads
  • War in Ukraine
  • Garden Chats
  • On The Road
  • 2021-22 Fundraising!
You are here: Home / z-Retired Categories / Site Maintenance / Some Changes Around Here

Some Changes Around Here

by Tim F|  August 14, 20061:45 pm| 266 Comments

This post is in: Site Maintenance

FacebookTweetEmail

Now is as good a time as any to announce that the blog is about to get a bit more crowded – we have invited regular Tom in Texas to join the motley crew of Balloon Juice contributors. Tom has an encyclopaedic wine knowledge (I hope that doesn’t embarrass him) and has promised to offer up some wine-and-food blogging on a higher level than the stuff that we’re used to around here, plus whatever other topics strike his fancy. Tom is also our first contributor to hail from outside Steelers country so we might look forward to a bit of late-season friction to liven things up.

Oh yeah, and I should probably tell John. Treat this as an open thread.

FacebookTweetEmail
Previous Post: « Oy
Next Post: No Disarming Hizballuh »

Reader Interactions

266Comments

  1. 1.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    I don’t like him already. He sounds like one of those dot-com’ers who moved to Austin and ruined it for the rest of us.

  2. 2.

    Pb

    August 14, 2006 at 1:53 pm

    Oh yeah, and I should probably tell John.

    LOL. Congratulations Tom, and welcome to the inner circle of Tim F.’s blog!

  3. 3.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 1:54 pm

    Ahh srv. I only let Austin corrupt me for six years. Now its the strong and safely red environs of Houston for me. Too many hippies in Travis County.

  4. 4.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 1:55 pm

    Although fair warning. The Longhorns left a deep impression on my young mind. I can be a little.. irrationally exuberant when it comes to them.

  5. 5.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    I only let Austin corrupt me for six years

    Another bright conservative who took 6 years getting thru college.

    Well, at least he’s not some migrant from Dallas.

  6. 6.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    John. Tom. Tim.

    So any of you wannabe contributors out there, if you don’t have a monosyllabic first name, you’re S.O.L.

  7. 7.

    Off Colfax

    August 14, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    Or don’t blog under a monosyllabic pseudonym, probably.

  8. 8.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 2:19 pm

    It’s far easier for some of you to understand us when we keep our words to one syllable.

  9. 9.

    demimondian

    August 14, 2006 at 2:23 pm

    It’s far easier for some of you to understand us when we keep our words to one syllable.

    Test BJ wine commentary…

    This wine starts with the scent of glue, then ends with a hint of pond scum like red tide.

    Yup, it works…

  10. 10.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 2:23 pm

    What is this becoming? Some sort of French wine and food guide?

  11. 11.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    Steve — I will make you a promise. I will not review a French wine until I have tasted one from every other continent on earth. They have ice wine in Antarctica, right?

  12. 12.

    Punchy

    August 14, 2006 at 2:32 pm

    Buy too many phones, take some pictures…oh yeah, and have brown skin….get arrested

    Please note:

    Kowalski said there was nothing illegal about buying cell phones in bulk

    and the last time I checked, snapping photos wasn’t illegal, either…yet:

    Local prosecutors charged them with collecting or providing materials for terrorist acts and surveillance of a vulnerable target for terrorist purposes.

    Wow…Bush really IS pulling out all the stops of the Fear Train 2006…hooo-leee shit.

  13. 13.

    Cyrus

    August 14, 2006 at 2:32 pm

    Tom is also our first contributor to hail from outside Steelers country so we might look forward to a bit of late-season friction to liven things up.

    Steelers, schmeelers. You want real intellectual diversity? Bring in someone who — gasp! — doesn’t follow pro sports. Complete strangers playing games for no stakes but their own massive salaries, interrupted constantly by ads and mindless chatter? Bah. It’s all right if you have the mindset of a Rob Schneider fan, I guess. If I want to watch men in spandex tackling each other, football beats gay porn, but I’d still prefer comic books.

    DISCLAIMER: I got about two hours of sleep last night due to jet lag. I chose the wrong weekend to visit a friend out west. The new, ridiculous security measures probably caused less than half my problems — it took three tries before I made it onto a plane.

  14. 14.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 2:36 pm

    My question about the cell phone terorists is pretty basic. I’ll freely admit that I’m not up to date on the explosive capabilities of cellular technology, but it seems to me that they only needed one cell phone, attached to one very big bomb, to blow up the bridge. What would a terrorist need 1000 cell phones for? Were they just going to give one to every driver over the bridge and waut for catastrophe? Or throw them all at the bridge at once? I’m baffled.

  15. 15.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 2:37 pm

    It’s far easier for some of you to understand us when we keep our words to one syllable.

    I have a feeling this blog is going to get a bit more interesting…

    And Tom, there’s excellent icewine here in Nova Scotia, FYI.

  16. 16.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 2:40 pm

    Krista — I’ve tried the Inniskillin, which I am a huge fan of. Other than that I am afraid I’m a little behind on the Canadian ice wines.

  17. 17.

    Tim F.

    August 14, 2006 at 2:43 pm

    What would a terrorist need 1000 cell phones for?

    I believe the idea is that they will use and dispose of them faster than the authorities can keep up.

  18. 18.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 2:45 pm

    I highly recommend Jost’s 2003 Vidal Icewine. They don’t ship to the U.S., but if you have any Canadian friends who will be visiting you, or who you will be visiting, you might want to ask them to order you a bottle. It’s lovely, lovely stuff — pure ambrosia.

  19. 19.

    Punchy

    August 14, 2006 at 2:50 pm

    What would a terrorist need 1000 cell phones for? Were they just going to give one to every driver over the bridge and waut for catastrophe? Or throw them all at the bridge at once? I’m baffled.

    Now that’s a funny image. 3 Brown Guys chucking a thousand phones at the bridge, trying to either bring it down or give the fish below a good reason to call their dolphin brethren near St. Barts.

    I can just see the Yankee’s pitching scout out there with a radar gun and contracts waiting for one of them to throw a phone slider at 78 mph…

  20. 20.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 2:50 pm

    What would a terrorist need 1000 cell phones for?

    They keep smashing them in frustration when they lose their signal.

  21. 21.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 2:51 pm

    I understand they can dispose of the phones after using them and that they are untraceable, but they already traveled into Detroit with all of these phones in their trunk. Was this plan really in the discussion phase? And if so, why not go to FISA and tell them “we found some guys that bought a thousand phones. We need to observe what’s being said over them for the next few weeks or months.”

  22. 22.

    Halffasthero

    August 14, 2006 at 2:53 pm

    Steelers? and I am trying to picture hippies in Travis County. I don’t remember seeing any when I visited there. Of course, I never really remember much of anything about my visits to Austin after going onto 6th Street for some strange reason.

  23. 23.

    Bender

    August 14, 2006 at 2:54 pm

    Buy too many phones, take some pictures…oh yeah, and have brown skin….get arrested

    Let’s see, they’re young Arab males buying untraceable prepaid tracphones that can be used to detonate explosives. They’re travelling around the country, buying in cash and in small enough quantities per purchase that they don’t set off quantity alarms. They rip the packaging open and take out the battery charger. They say they are marking them up $5 and selling them to someone in Dallas. Where they go then, who knows?

    Sounds perfectly legitimate to me. Who wouldn’t pay $5 above retail for a ripped-box, no-charger tracphone from some guy in a van?

    Punchy must have a bunch of old half-finished connect-the-dots books at home.

  24. 24.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 3:01 pm

    Where they go then, who knows?

    Well, we would, if we were to monitor this group rather than loudly accusing them of a conspiracy of which we have no (publicly) available evidence.

  25. 25.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    It just strikes me that we are doing this in a backwards manner. If the Miami captives were really planning on buying explosives and uniforms from the FBI, let them buy them. We know who they are and where they live. If these guys were planning on sending cell phones somewhere to be wired as explosives, let them mail them and see where they go. Then we can actually say, with proof, that they are part of a conspiracy.

  26. 26.

    Rusty Shackleford

    August 14, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    Tom in Texas Says:

    It’s far easier for some of you to understand us when we keep our words to one syllable.

    August 14th, 2006 at 2:19 pm

    Obviously, Tom has been briefed on Darrell.

  27. 27.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 3:09 pm

    Then we can actually say, with proof, that they are part of a conspiracy.

    There is no future for that kind of sensible idea in either government, or the blogosphere.

  28. 28.

    Nikki

    August 14, 2006 at 3:11 pm

    Then we can actually say, with proof, that they are part of a conspiracy.

    Isn’t that how the Brits made their latest catch? Monitored them so they could take down as many in the conspiracy as they could rather than make a splashy arrest with just a few underlings?

  29. 29.

    Punchy

    August 14, 2006 at 3:11 pm

    Sounds perfectly legitimate to me. Who wouldn’t pay $5 above retail for a ripped-box, no-charger tracphone from some guy in a van?

    Nah…that’s never been done before. NO ONE has ever bought things in bulk, then resold them individually at a markup. That’s a novel idea, and something these guys simply could NOT have dreamt up.

    Wow, you pants-wetters are stunningly idiotic. If you WANTED TO HIDE YOUR PLAN, you wouldn’t buy them by the thousand and have all of them in your possession at once. You also wouldn’t have THREE Middle Eastern men all doing it at the same time. Uh…last time I checked, wanna-be bank robbers don’t buy ski masks, gloves, guns and ammo all from the same store at the same time.

    Bender’s waiting for the neighborhood Jordanian to purchase an alarm clock, a Casio watch, and some duct tape and then he’s going ring up the DHS he has on speedial and have him arrested for being in possession of a “timer”, a “detonation device”, and “material to support duct-tape terrorism”. And then maybe he’ll unwet himself.

  30. 30.

    Tim F.

    August 14, 2006 at 3:17 pm

    Monitored them so they could take down as many in the conspiracy as they could rather than make a splashy arrest with just a few underlings?

    Sounds like the Padilla Principle – grab them when you have nothing more than hearsay and suppositions, make a quick headline and then quietly let them go when the case gets laughed out of court.

  31. 31.

    Punchy

    August 14, 2006 at 3:22 pm

    we have invited regular Tom in Texas to join the motley crew of Balloon Juice contributors. Tom has an encyclopaedic wine knowledge

    Tim, Darrell has an encyclowhatever knowledge of strawman, heresay, misquoting, and dumbassness…can we get him a part-time posting gig, too?

    Let’s see where Tom stands:
    Tom, what’s a better wine: Boone’s Farm Strawberry, or Mad Dog 20/20 Grape? Tailgaters are hanging on your every word…

  32. 32.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 3:29 pm

    Nah…that’s never been done before. NO ONE has ever bought things in bulk, then resold them individually at a markup. That’s a novel idea, and something these guys simply could NOT have dreamt up.

    I think we need to start a War on Arbitrage.

  33. 33.

    Tom in Texas

    August 14, 2006 at 3:31 pm

    Punchy;
    I drank Boone’s Strawberry farm as a penniless freshman, and I drank a bottle during every game of the NLCS last year (except for the game where Pujols robbed Lidge of his innocence). Boone’s has an undeniable emotional attachment for me, and while I do not begrudge anyone their enjoyment of the bright initial aroma of MD 20/20, or its finish reminiscent of Grape Kool-Aid, I have to stand by my Boone’s. Best. Screwtop. Ever.

  34. 34.

    Ancient Purple

    August 14, 2006 at 3:56 pm

    I will catch up here.

    1. Welcome, Tom.

    2. Cardinals beat Steelers yesterday.

    3. Magnotta Ice Wine is an excellent ice wine.

    4. So, you can’t buy cell phones in bulk nor take Gatorade on a plane. However, our ports have no extra security and they don’t scan cargo aboard your plane. Enjoy your flight.

  35. 35.

    demimondian

    August 14, 2006 at 4:05 pm

    I think we need to start a War on Arbitrage.

    Arbitrage is simply profiting from the difference in price for a given item in two markets. That’s, you know, buy low sell high?

    Perry, what do you have against our freedom to exploit our fellow man?

  36. 36.

    Davebo

    August 14, 2006 at 4:18 pm

    Now its the strong and safely red environs of Houston for me.

    Safely red environs of Houston? Huh?

    If you said Harris County I’d agree. But when you break it down to precinct totals…. well, not so much.

  37. 37.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 4:20 pm

    My question about the cell phone terorists is pretty basic. I’ll freely admit that I’m not up to date on the explosive capabilities of cellular technology, but it seems to me that they only needed one cell phone, attached to one very big bomb, to blow up the bridge. What would a terrorist need 1000 cell phones for? Were they just going to give one to every driver over the bridge and waut for catastrophe? Or throw them all at the bridge at once? I’m baffled.

    I’m not sure why a terrorist, specifically, would. As for any sort of criminal conspiracy, it’s really pretty simple – to tap your phone, they have to know what your phone # is (in addition, there are legalities which make it marginally more difficult to tap an ever changing cell #, but per “The Wire”, I’m gonna go ahead and bet that if you have the knowledge of the network sufficient to support the intial wiretap, the hurdle is more technical than legal.)

    So basically, how it works is, they purchase “burners” disposable cells, preprogram the only numbers they need, and pass them out. Then a week later, they chuck the old phones, and hand out new, newly programmed ones. Without some way of knowing what new numbers will be used, the network disappears – this is why they purchase at multiple locations – if they bought in bulk from one store, the police/feds could make an educated guess as to what the new numbers would be.

  38. 38.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 4:21 pm

    Sounds like the Padilla Principle – grab them when you have nothing more than hearsay and suppositions, make a quick headline and then quietly let them go when the case gets laughed out of court.

    I think the move is known as an Ashcroft.

  39. 39.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 4:27 pm

    As an addendum to my earlier post – I’d say that the information we have so far offers a pretty strong supposition of criminal behavior, though I’m not sure what, aside from skin color, implicates specifically terrorism (though I imagine it’s probably pretty hard out there for an Arab pimp these days.)

  40. 40.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 4:29 pm

    The arrests in Britain have not helped President Bush’s popularity so far, the CBS poll finds. His job approval remains exactly at 36 percent, where it was a month ago. — CBS today

    Ow. That makes me ….. sad.

  41. 41.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 4:31 pm

    Without some way of knowing what new numbers will be used, the network disappears

    Makes one wonder if there’s a secret agreement between disposable phone network operators and the government.

    Why listen to everybody if you can just watch those using disposables?

  42. 42.

    John Cole

    August 14, 2006 at 4:34 pm

    Did someone explain to PPGAZ that Tom’s expertise is wine, and not ‘whine,’ so we are not treading on his turf.

  43. 43.

    Richard Bottoms

    August 14, 2006 at 4:43 pm

    Another morale booster from President Shithead.

    WASHINGTON — About 300 Alaska-based soldiers sent home from Iraq just before their unit’s deployment was extended last month must now go back, the Army said Monday, setting up a wrenching departure for troops and families who thought their service there was finished.

    link

    Must be tough to live with yourself if you are one of the people who voted for this crowd. And, I wonder which one of these troops will now draw the Ace of Spades in Iraq after having dodged that fate the first time around.

  44. 44.

    Mac Buckets

    August 14, 2006 at 4:44 pm

    Did someone explain to PPGAZ that Tom’s expertise is wine, and not ‘whine,’ so we are not treading on his turf.

    Zing!

    “Gentlemen! This cannot continue! We have important work to do here! I’m going to have to demand that you guys have a best-of-three Zing-slash-Burn Off, with the winner declared Zingmaster.”

  45. 45.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 4:44 pm

    Did someone explain to PPGAZ that Tom’s expertise is wine, and not ‘whine,’

    Thank you!

  46. 46.

    DougJ

    August 14, 2006 at 4:46 pm

    Quick: name all the grand crus in Vosne-Romanee, Mr. Wine Expert!

  47. 47.

    Punchy

    August 14, 2006 at 4:48 pm

    I’d say that the information we have so far offers a pretty strong supposition of criminal behavior,

    Well, not so much…from my first post:

    Kowalski said there was nothing illegal about buying cell phones in bulk

    Show me the statute–any statute–that either specifies the maximum number of TOTAL phones one can buy, the max number of phones allowed in one vehicle, the max number of Brown Guys in one vehicle, or the minimum amount of fear the police are required to ratchet up between now and November.

    Otherwise, there’s absolutely no criminal behavior.

  48. 48.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 4:48 pm

    name all the grand crus in Vosne-Romanee

    Are those cars?

    Citroen oil filters, or ?

  49. 49.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 4:51 pm

    the max number of Brown Guys in one vehicle

    It varies with the neighborhood.

    On my street it is equal to the number of seats in the car.

    But in Scottsdale, it’s two if the vehicle is an old truck towing a trailer with lawn equipment, or one if it’s a car or delivery van. Unless it’s a ballplayer, then it’s whatever he wants. Unless it’s a bike, then it’s zero, because the bike is stolen.

    Basic common sense.

  50. 50.

    Richard Bottoms

    August 14, 2006 at 4:52 pm

    >the max number of Brown Guys in one vehicle

    From personal experience, one.

  51. 51.

    demimondian

    August 14, 2006 at 4:58 pm

    grand crus in Vosne-Romanee

    That’s “grands crus”, not “grand crus”.

    Sincerely yours,
    Grammar Nazgul

  52. 52.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:00 pm

    Tom, is it true that there is a town in Texas for every word in the English language?

    Old Dime Box, TX

    Refuge, TX

    Frog, TX

    Gun Barrel City, TX

    Uncertain, TX

    etc

  53. 53.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 5:00 pm

    Punchy, I’m not saying that what we know is direct evidence of criminal behavior, and it is certainly not criminal in and of itself – but it is the kind of thing wherein I might want to focus more investigative attention. Is their story – that they were just looking to arbitrage the phones – plausible? Absolutely, but purchasing a mess of disposable phones in small lots is suspicious.

  54. 54.

    Punchy

    August 14, 2006 at 5:14 pm

    Absolutely, but purchasing a mess of disposable phones in small lots is suspicious.

    Agreed. But one ought not be arrested for suspicious LEGAL behavior. Investigated, sure. Arrested? Nope. Otherwise, what’s next? I.D. Cards demonstrating you’re not an Arab just to buy fertilizer, or wire, or timers, or white women? Where does it end?

  55. 55.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 5:17 pm

    Tom, is it true that there is a town in Texas for every word in the English language?

    Go check out some of the town names in Newfoundland, and come back to me when you can pick your jaw up off the floor.

  56. 56.

    Tim F.

    August 14, 2006 at 5:21 pm

    Cards demonstrating you’re not an Arab just to buy fertilizer, or wire, or timers, or white women?

    I can deal with most of that, but I draw the line at showing ID when I buy white women. Some rights are simply non-negotiable.

  57. 57.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 5:26 pm

    Agreed. But one ought not be arrested for suspicious LEGAL behavior. Investigated, sure. Arrested? Nope. Otherwise, what’s next? I.D. Cards demonstrating you’re not an Arab just to buy fertilizer, or wire, or timers, or white women? Where does it end?

    I don’t think we’re disagreeing at all. I take no position on the arrests because I don’t know anything – there could be more, but I’m not really in a doubt giving mood when the headlines scream about thwarted terror plots. Something along the lines of “and if you believe that, I’ve got a bridge for you to blowtorch”

    (Note to NSA, that’s a JOKE. Yay Capitalism!)

  58. 58.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 5:27 pm

    Tom, is it true that there is a town in Texas for every word in the English language?

    You think we give and Arizona Monkey’s Eyebrow? Why do you care?

    I think you’re just being Petty about the Veribest and Happy Camelot this side of Tiki Island. I think you Neeedmore respect for Progress, Old Glory you Old Boston Tuxedo-wearing Royalty.

    So take your Dime Box and move to Paris, Egypt or Turkey.

    Try to Grow your Arizona Lawn without our Sweetwater you Twitty Skidmore Bigfoot.

  59. 59.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:28 pm

    Krista, I will check that out.

    Meanwhile, I’m wondering, if I am in Uncertain, TX, and I am not sure of something …. like, why Darrell bothers to get out of bed in the morning …..

    Am I then in a state of uncertainty in the town of Uncertain?

    I’m ….. not sure.

  60. 60.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:29 pm

    I think you’re just being Petty about the Veribest and Happy Camelot this side of Tiki Island. I think you Neeedmore respect for Progress, Old Glory you Old Boston Tuxedo-wearing Royalty.

    Oh my low-ard!

  61. 61.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 5:31 pm

    This is just a Newfoundland sampler…
    Jerry’s Nose
    Nick’s Nose Cove
    Come-by-Chance
    Blow-me-down
    Lushes Bight
    Bumble Bee Bight
    Ha Ha Bay
    Run-by-guess
    Bleak Joke Cove
    Calves Nose
    Nancy Oh
    Little Looping Harbour
    Snake’s Bight
    Joe Batt’s Arm
    Dildo

  62. 62.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 5:32 pm

    Oh, and take your Canadian Lolita Lazbuddie to Flat New Boston

  63. 63.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:34 pm

    I like that Newfoundland sampler. It speaks of people who don’t take life too seriously, a sense of humor.

    People you would want to drink beer with.

  64. 64.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 5:37 pm

    I wonder if all these news stories reporting that authorities can’t track prepaid cell phones realize that they are aiding and comforting terrorists?

    Maybe we should pass some sort of federal law making this a crime of treason?

    We also should look at outlawing payphones, as we all know from the years of treasonous leaks from hollywood, they are the phone of choice used by Kidnappers and other nasty criminals. I wouldn’t be surprised if the terrorists also don’t know how to use a pay phone.

  65. 65.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 5:37 pm

    Agreed. But one ought not be arrested for suspicious LEGAL behavior. Investigated, sure. Arrested?

    You assume the phones are all they’ve got without knowing what other evidence the authorities have. I read in a report that one of the men are here illegally.

    If they were arrested solely because they bought a lot of disposable cell phones, sure, that would be crap. But you should trying waiting for a few more facts to come out before claiming that’s all there is to it.

  66. 66.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 5:39 pm

    Newfoundlanders are some of the finest people on the entire planet. It’s the poorest province in the country, but the people there would give you the shirts off their backs. A lot of flights were stuck there during 9-11, and can attest to what remarkable human beings they all are. And ThymeZone, you’re absolutely right — they know how to have a good time.

  67. 67.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 5:40 pm

    name all the grand crus in Vosne-Romanee

    Man I’d have thought that was a region of Czech Republic, except it has way too many vowels.

  68. 68.

    Punchy

    August 14, 2006 at 5:42 pm

    Ha Ha Bay

    Sounds like a great place to open a Chuckle Hut or other corny-named comedy club

    I’m not sure where to start with “Dildo”…Should I go with the “They sell a lot of batteries” yuk-yuk or open with “And you thought San Fran smelled like fish” yarn…?

  69. 69.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    President Bush declared Lebanon a front in the “global war on terrorism” Monday, equating the Israeli battle against Lebanon’s Hezbollah guerrillas to the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
    CNN at this hour.

    Observe the photo on CNN’s banner page, the Three Stooges (Well, two stooges and a stoogette) ….

    Could these people BE any more completely insane?

    I mean, seriously. Even if there were such a thing as a “war on terror,” which there is not, never has been nor never will be, do they really think that they’ve accomplished anything worthwhile in the last month?

    Hizbullah is now the leading terrorist organization in the Arab/Muslim world, thanks to this clusterfuck, is it not? With more popular support than it could have earned on its own in twenty years, thanks to the feckless Israelis and their American enablers.

    Good God almighty.

    Bush added: “We can only imagine how much more dangerous this conflict would be if Iran had the nuclear weapon it seeks.”

    Any doubt about what these fuckers are doing here? How long before they start talking about “mushroom clouds” on the Sunday talk shows again?

  70. 70.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    “And you thought San Fran smelled like fish”

    { thud }

    Medic!

  71. 71.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 5:48 pm

    ppG, we’re fighting them over there (and there, and there, and over there but on their way here, eventually, too) so that we…zzzzzzz

  72. 72.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    Oh dear. Fox News has just had two journalists kidnapped in the Gaza Strip.

    No word yet on whether one of them was Geraldo looking for Al Capone’s lost treasure.

  73. 73.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 5:52 pm

    Hizbullah is now the leading terrorist organization in the Arab/Muslim world, thanks to this clusterfuck, is it not?

    Let’s see, Hezbullah terrorism is Bush’s fault.. and Bush is itching to drag us into a nuclear war

    Bush added: “We can only imagine how much more dangerous this conflict would be if Iran had the nuclear weapon it seeks.”

    Any doubt about what these fuckers are doing here?

    You know, as bad as things look for the Repubs in November, just wait until voters get an up-close look at the alternative.

  74. 74.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:53 pm

    Q: what do you say to critics who say there are giant loopholes in homeland security?

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    transcript of remarks, Aug 14 (edited by me)

    There he is, on the job.

    Sleep well tonight.

  75. 75.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 5:53 pm

    If they were arrested solely because they bought a lot of disposable cell phones, sure, that would be crap. But you should trying waiting for a few more facts to come out before claiming that’s all there is to it.

    You gotta admit, the whole thing does sound pathetically funny.

    It’s like we’re stuck in this weird version of The Russians are Coming.

  76. 76.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:54 pm

    Let’s see, Hezbullah terrorism is Bush’s fault

    What is wrong with you? Can you even follow a train of thought?

  77. 77.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 5:54 pm

    You know, as bad as things look for the Repubs in November, just wait until voters get an up-close look at the alternative.

    You think being Pro-World War III is a credible platform to be running on to gain electoral support?

  78. 78.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 5:54 pm

    And take your Novice, Mutual, Darouzett Hoop and Holler Groom to your Looneyville where the Sunray don’t Shiner. By Sundown.

    It’s a long way across Texas when you’re in the back seat…

  79. 79.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 5:55 pm

    It’s like we’re stuck in this weird version of The Russians are Coming.

    Part Four, starring Owen Wilson.

  80. 80.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    Can we confirm that one of the Fox News journalists kidnapped was not Bill O’Reilly out looking for some Falafel?

  81. 81.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 5:59 pm

    Oh dear. Fox News has just had two journalists kidnapped in the Gaza Strip.

    No word yet as to whether Markos Moulitsas at DKos has declared “screw them”

  82. 82.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:01 pm

    Fox news reporters actually went outside?

  83. 83.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 6:02 pm

    If they were arrested solely because they bought a lot of disposable cell phones, sure, that would be crap. But you should trying waiting for a few more facts to come out before claiming that’s all there is to it.

    I agree. As much as I disagree with some of the Bush Administration’s decisions, I think the left is overreacting as usual on this one.

    Maybe Bush is violating some Constitutional principles here, but probably not. Only time will tell, although I realize this is an election year and partisanship waits for nothing.

    I agree with Darrell here.

  84. 84.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    No word yet as to whether Markos Moulitsas at DKos has declared “screw them”

    No word on how much Fox will use this to milk ratings either.

  85. 85.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    You think being Pro-World War III is a credible platform to be running on to gain electoral support?

    As Jon Steward said, for Republicans, “End of the world” is not just a slogan, it’s a campaign promise.

  86. 86.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    No word on how much Fox will use this to milk ratings either.

    It’s called “journalism.” Back when Walter Cronkite was its king, I don’t recall too many liberals whining about it.

  87. 87.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    Only time will tell, although I realize this is an election year and partisanship waits for nothing.

    When you walk into a room, all profundity in the world gets sucked away into a back hole somewhere.

  88. 88.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 6:05 pm

    As Jon Steward said, for Republicans, “End of the world” is not just a slogan, it’s a campaign promise.

    Do you mean John Stewart?

    I have to say, he’s often pretty funny. In an irreverent, iconoclastic way.

  89. 89.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:05 pm

    It’s called “journalism.” Back when Walter Cronkite was its king, I don’t recall

    Uh huh. You hadn’t been born yet, dipshit.

  90. 90.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 6:06 pm

    When you walk into a room, all profundity in the world gets sucked away into a back hole somewhere.

    How is one expected to reply to this sort of gobbledygook?

  91. 91.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 6:06 pm

    You think being Pro-World War III is a credible platform to be running on to gain electoral support?

    At least the Republicans have a plan to start WWIII. Where’s the Democrat plan to start the next world war?

  92. 92.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:07 pm

    Do you mean John Stewart?

    No, Jon Steward, my chauffeur.

  93. 93.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:09 pm

    How is one expected to reply to this sort of gobbledygook?

    Oh, you’ll think of something nothing a way.

  94. 94.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 6:10 pm

    Quick poll. Are you:

    1) Pro-WWIII
    2) Pro-terrorist

    ?

  95. 95.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 6:11 pm

    I agree with Darrell here.

    Well that is some bad news, isn’t it?

    See if you can pick ppgaz out of the photos from this lovely little ‘peace’ protest in SF over the weekend

  96. 96.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 6:12 pm

    At least the Republicans have a plan to start WWIII. Where’s the Democrat plan to start the next world war?

    Which makes me wonder why Bush lovers are so anti-Iran nukes. I mean, how else are they going to depopulate liberal urban cities?

  97. 97.

    chopper

    August 14, 2006 at 6:13 pm

    What is wrong with you? Can you even follow a train of thought?

    his train of thought is still boarding at the station.

  98. 98.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:13 pm

    Quick poll. Are you:

    1) Pro-WWIII
    2) Pro-terrorist

    I’m Rapture Ready , baby.

  99. 99.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:23 pm

    Darrell’s Home Page

    Darrell’s Political Action Committee

  100. 100.

    Ancient Purple

    August 14, 2006 at 6:24 pm

    How is one expected to reply to this sort of gobbledygook?

    Is it gobbledygook? I don’t know.

    Maybe in 20 years, history will decide if it is gobbledygook.

    Until then, I will remain ambivalent neutral.

  101. 101.

    Judy

    August 14, 2006 at 6:30 pm

    Okay can we talk about George Allen now or is he off limits. Any one see the video, I was struck by the laughter in the background. Edwards was right we are better than this.

  102. 102.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:41 pm

    Okay can we talk about George Allen now or is he off limits. Any one see the video, I was struck by the laughter in the background. Edwards was right we are better than this.

    George Allen’s Race Problem

    It’s pay for view but you can Google and read the cached version for free. It’s …. sobering.

  103. 103.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 6:50 pm

    George Allen’s Race Problem

    Great article! asserting George allen is a racist because he wears cowboy boots. Count how many times the writer brings up the cowboy boots as ‘evidence’ of Allen’s racism. You Dems are fucking pathetic.. but smearing your opponent as a racist is a tried and true Dem playbook move.

  104. 104.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 6:51 pm

    But is George Allen the al Qaeda candidate? Strong. Smart.

  105. 105.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 6:55 pm

    You Dems are fucking pathetic

    Sure, but consider the alternative:

    Q: what do you say to critics who say there are giant loopholes in homeland security?

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    transcript of remarks, Aug 14

  106. 106.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 7:01 pm

    Sure, but consider the alternative:

    First, Bush isn’t running for re-election. Second, I think it was entirely reasonable of him to ask specifically what ‘giant’ loopholes the reporter was referring to. Fucking reporter making vague accusations without offering any specifics.

  107. 107.

    chriskoz

    August 14, 2006 at 7:01 pm

    Darrell says:

    Great article! asserting George allen is a racist because he wears cowboy boots. Count how many times the writer brings up the cowboy boots as ‘evidence’ of Allen’s racism. You Dems are fucking pathetic.. but smearing your opponent as a racist is a tried and true Dem playbook move.

    And Darrell knows a few things about racism. After all… the article is nothing but “Arab lies”… right Darrell.

  108. 108.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:04 pm

    First, Bush isn’t running for re-election. Second, I think it was entirely reasonable of him to ask specifically what ‘giant’ loopholes the reporter was referring to. Fucking reporter making vague accusations without offering any specifics.

    Amazing. I hand you a shovel, and you dig furiously.

    Excuse me, I need to run down to Ace Hardware …..

  109. 109.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    After all… the article is nothing but “Arab lies”… right Darrell.

    Did you hear that Jews jewed the arabs out of Palestine? One of the leftists at this protest told me so

  110. 110.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 7:06 pm

    fter all… the article is nothing but “Arab lies”… right Darrell.

    The article was probably written by one of those “stupid and naive” Jews.

  111. 111.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:09 pm

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    They didn’t put the loophole question on my shirtsleeve. Can you please axe another question?

  112. 112.

    Judy

    August 14, 2006 at 7:10 pm

    Darrell, I think that if you watched the video of Allen you would be disappointed. It should not be a Repub or Dem thing. We are all in this country together, right?

  113. 113.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:11 pm

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    Condi didn’t bring up the loopholes during the briefing. What’s important to remember is they hate us for our freedoms.

  114. 114.

    chriskoz

    August 14, 2006 at 7:12 pm

    Did you hear that Jews jewed the arabs out of Palestine? One of the leftists at this protest told me so

    And that in some way excuses your racism?

    I don’t see your point. (unless your point is… “look… over there… a Jackalope”)

  115. 115.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 7:13 pm

    Judy Says:

    Darrell, I think that if you watched the video of Allen you would be disappointed. It should not be a Repub or Dem thing. We are all in this country together, right?

    Judy, you haven’t linked to any video, so what are you talking about? I responded to an article Thyme linked to accusing Allen of racism because he wears cowboy boots. You got something more? show it please.. rather than your phony “we are the world” posturing.

  116. 116.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:13 pm

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    No fair asking a question I didn’t already know nothing … er already didn’t know, or know about.

    Some terrorists may fall through the loopholes but that’s why need the Patriot Act to catch them, because the Patriot Act doesn’t permit loopholes.

  117. 117.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 7:14 pm

    And that in some way excuses your racism?

    Are you calling me a racist shitstain? On what basis are doing that? Please substantiate that accusation so that we can see context and specific language.. and also see what a lying sack of shit you truly are

  118. 118.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    I really am not all that concerned with loopholes now. Some want us not to have the tools we need to bring the loopholes to justice. Those folks need to be reminded that these people want to destroy us.

  119. 119.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:16 pm

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    The government is your protection against the holes, or the loopholes as you call them. As long as I’m president, we will defend this country against loopholes.

  120. 120.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 7:20 pm

    We are all in this country together, right?

    Unless you are a gay scoutmaster…

  121. 121.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:20 pm

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    Look, every terrorist can see a loophole, but that’s why we have to be reminded that these fascists want to destroy Americans and our freedoms. Is there a loophole? Sure. Is the loopholes being tightened up and can we travel through these loopholes? See …. this is why we need to stop politicizing the loopholes and work together as a country to fight the terrorists.

  122. 122.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 7:21 pm

    BUSH: Well, first, I would say that, you know, I don’t know the loophole question. Maybe you can give me some specific loopholes

    “Thank you, Mister President.”

    “No, thank you.”

  123. 123.

    Judy

    August 14, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    Darrell, Wonkette and several other sites have Allen’s video.

  124. 124.

    Judy

    August 14, 2006 at 7:27 pm

    Darrell, I should have added the Washington Post to that because they also link to it.

  125. 125.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 7:28 pm

    Darrell, Wonkette and several other sites have Allen’s video.

    It’s all “Arab lies.”

  126. 126.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 7:31 pm

    Judy Says:

    Darrell, Wonkette and several other sites have Allen’s video.

    Then why the hell didn’t you provide a link, rather than criticizing me for not watching a video I didn’t even know existed? Do you assume I have clairvoyant powers Judy?

  127. 127.

    chriskoz

    August 14, 2006 at 7:36 pm

    Well Darrell… All I would have to do is point people to your Aug 1st, 10:47pm post in the “The New Patriotism” thread, where in you proceed to smear an entire race with comments like “Arab lies”. And when called on it… you sputter out some sort of “Jane Hamshers of the left” defense that is quite laughable. The thread didn’t occur that long ago… have you honestly forgotten about it?

    And really… the fact that you are already resorting to the “shitstain” moniker speaks volumes about your thinking abilities. (or lack thereof)

  128. 128.

    chriskoz

    August 14, 2006 at 7:37 pm

    P.S.- I am indeed calling you a racist Darrell.

  129. 129.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 7:39 pm

    Did Darrell just call someone out for not providing a link? Much like my former governor, Darrell ain’t got time to bleedlink…

  130. 130.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 7:41 pm

    Judy, I watched the video on Wonkette, and I was horrified at the use of the racist epithet * gasp * “Ma Caca” toward the campaign aid of his political opponent who was following him with a video camera. I think all Americans should cross party lines in bipartisan condemnation of Allen as you suggest.. as such an obviously offensive term as Ma Caca should never be uttered in public.

  131. 131.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 7:43 pm

    Well Darrell… All I would have to do is point people to your Aug 1st, 10:47pm post in the “The New Patriotism” thread, where in you proceed to smear an entire race with comments like “Arab lies”. And when called on it… you sputter out some sort of “Jane Hamshers of the left” defense that is quite laughable.

    You’re lying your ass off. That’s why you dare not link and post in full context.

  132. 132.

    Pooh

    August 14, 2006 at 7:47 pm

    P.S.- I am indeed calling you a racist Darrell.

    I’m not comfortable calling Darrell a racist yet. An all purpose, genuinely homophobic bigot? I think he takes that much as a compliment…

    As for Darrell’s defense of the Jewish people (uhm, speaking for those of us I can, thanks, but no thanks…), it’s always heartwarming to see a prejudice defeated by an even deeper prejudice

  133. 133.

    chriskoz

    August 14, 2006 at 7:51 pm

    Darrell says:

    You’re lying your ass off. That’s why you dare not link and post in full context.

    Actually…. I didn’t link because the comment preview was mangled when I inserted the link. so, I didn’t trust it would come out correctly. I did however provide enough info to go look it up yourself. (and if you were an honest individual you would have looked up what I referenced before you decided to call me a liar)

    I certainly didn’t think you would be as lame as to try and use that as a cop out. But I guess I underestimated your stupidity. So… mangled preview be damned… here is your link

    You got what you asked for… now, how are you going to dodge it this time?

  134. 134.

    Judy

    August 14, 2006 at 7:56 pm

    Darrell, don’t get so testy, I didn’t link because I’m pretty old and don’t know how, but I’m getting pretty good on this copy and paste stuff. Wouldn’t it have been better if your man had decided not to use racist terms, or to humilate a VA born man while he was born in Hollywood country. You don’t know me and I don’t know you but the reason I have always been independent is because my government is pretty important to me and I’m not afraid to read the issues and watch voting records. Of course for you Darrell, I’ll try to link next time.

  135. 135.

    Slide

    August 14, 2006 at 8:05 pm

    The Decider explaining how Hezbolla “lost” the war:

    The world got to see — got to see what it means to confront terrorism. I mean, it’s a — it’s the challenge of the 21st century, the fight against terror.

    A group of ideologues, by the way, who use terror to achieve an objective — this is the challenge.

    And that’s why in my remarks I spoke about the need for those of us who understand the blessings of liberty to help liberty prevail in the Middle East.

    And the fundamental question is: Can it? And my answer is: Absolutely, it can. I believe that freedom is a universal value. And by that, I mean I believe people want to be free.

    People want to be free. One way to put it is I believe mothers around the world want to raise their children in a peaceful world. That’s what I believe…

    aren’t we all so proud?

  136. 136.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:05 pm

    I certainly didn’t think you would be as lame as to try and use that as a cop out. But I guess I underestimated your stupidity. So… mangled preview be damned… here is your link

    Nothing lame about it shitstain. In the context of a discussion in which “John S” was using Jenin as an example of Israeli “war crimes”, I pointed out to him in response that Jenin was in fact a fraud perpetrated by arab lies to disgrace Israel. Nothing racist or dishonest in the least with my characterization of it as such. That was exactly what it was. That is the basis for your accusation of me being a racist? you’re really standing on ‘solid’ ground with that accusations shitstain, let me tell you.

  137. 137.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:07 pm

    Wouldn’t it have been better if your man had decided not to use racist terms

    Judy, I realize it’s trendy to repeat those sort of accusations with all the kool kidz, but is Ma Caca really a racist epithet? Get a grip

  138. 138.

    Judy

    August 14, 2006 at 8:12 pm

    Actually, I live in GA and Macaca is not used that often, but maybe it is among your friends.

  139. 139.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:14 pm

    Judy Says:

    Actually, I live in GA and Macaca is not used that often

    That would be because it’s not a racist epithet.. it’s not even a word, I think. But don’t let those inconvenient details stop you from accusing Allen of racism. Party over country, right?

  140. 140.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 8:16 pm

    Isn’t it crazy that we can now link to things and discuss them with some presumed basis of shared knowledge? Imagine what it must have been like for the Ancients, trying to have arguments 20 or 30 years ago. The lack of common text upon which to base their arguments must have been infuriating beyond contemporary comprehension.

  141. 141.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 8:19 pm

    And yes, Judy, he is always that rude. When he derided your attempt to find common ground as “phony ‘we are the world’ posturing”, that should have been your first indicator.

  142. 142.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:23 pm

    When he derided your attempt to find common ground as “phony ‘we are the world’ posturing”, that should have been your first indicator.

    It was phony.. phony as hell. First smearing Allen of using racist terms that aren’t even racist, then pretending that the ‘racism’ was sooo obvious and horrible, that we should all stop and agree to have a bipartisan condemnation over it. Nope, she wasn’t looking for common ground, no matter how much you pretend otherwise

  143. 143.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 8:30 pm

    First smearing Allen of using racist terms that aren’t even racist

    I would point you to the link that proves you wrong, but instead I’ll just call you an idiot. Idiot.

  144. 144.

    VidaLoca

    August 14, 2006 at 8:30 pm

    Darrell,

    it’s not even a word, I think.

    Well, Allen must think it’s a word, he used it. In a kind of unusual way…

    I think it’s a word that refers to a genus of monkeys common to India and SE Asia.

  145. 145.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 8:31 pm

    Regardless, for someone who has indicated that he is looking for honest debate, you certainly are very quick to bring the attack down to the personal level, I must say.

    If you want civility, then be civil.

  146. 146.

    Ancient Purple

    August 14, 2006 at 8:32 pm

    That would be because it’s not a racist epithet..

    You are wrong, as usual, Darrell.

    And you are even more wrong here.

    Sweet Jesus, you bigots will defend your own until the very end.

  147. 147.

    Ancient Purple

    August 14, 2006 at 8:33 pm

    I would point you to the link that proves you wrong, but instead I’ll just call you an idiot. Idiot.

    Perry, PLEASE!

    That is such an insult to idiots.

  148. 148.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:37 pm

    I guess after I responded to chriskoz’s BS accusations of racism, he ran like the cockroach he is. Why is it that the left is so much more prone to accuse ideological opponents of ‘racism’ and ‘bigotry’? Not just on this thread, they do it ALL THE TIME. Running ads of a black men dragged to death in a racist murder and trying to link it to Bush.. every two years you can listen to the black radio stations during campaign season warning of how Republicans want to “turn back the clock” on civil rights.. Kanye West, etc, etc. So many on the left really are vermin. They have no honor. Doubt me? Then explain why the left so often accuse others they disagree with baseless accusations of racism and hate… The left, by and large, is truly willing to divide and tear apart the country to achieve their political gain.

  149. 149.

    VidaLoca

    August 14, 2006 at 8:38 pm

    Judy,

    I didn’t link because I’m pretty old and don’t know how

    Around here it’s really easy. Immediately above the box in which you type your comments you’ll see a box with a double arrow on it. Click the box, it will expand a menu across the screen. From that menu click “Link”, you’ll get a box into which you can cut and paste your link. When done click “accept” in that box, it will embed the link in your comment.

  150. 150.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 8:38 pm

    it’s not even a word, I think

    See, Darrell thinks that if he has not heard the word, it’s not a word.

  151. 151.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:38 pm

    You are wrong, as usual, Darrell.

    Please, show of hands who has ever heard the term ‘Ma Cacca’ before? How many knew it was a racial epithet? Well then aholes, you certainly have a ‘valid’ accusation/smear then.

  152. 152.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 8:39 pm

    Nothing lame about it shitstain. In the context of a discussion in which “John S” was using Jenin as an example of Israeli “war crimes”, I pointed out to him in response that Jenin was in fact a fraud perpetrated by arab lies to disgrace Israel. Nothing racist or dishonest in the least with my characterization of it as such. That was exactly what it was. That is the basis for your accusation of me being a racist? you’re really standing on ‘solid’ ground with that accusations shitstain, let me tell you.

    And there you have it. John S. claims that Jenin was an Israeli atrocity, and Darrell retorts that Jenin was a fraud perpetrated by the Arabs themselves to besmirch the Israelis’ good name. Left and Right continue the epic battle of calling one another racists and liars, and various other things. Like “shitstain.” (Actually, Darrell, as colorful as this description may be, it is manifestly inaccurate. Defecation contains no life beyond microbes, is not capable of cognition, and is not capable of the locomotion necessary for complicated activities such as logging on to the Internet or typing rebuttals. Ergo, while you may have the best of intentions in utilizing it, you clearly allow your passions to outweigh your rational faculties.)

    Where does the truth lie in regards to the Jenin affair? Well, we may not know for a while, but it probably lies somewhere in the middle. Both sides are usually overwrought and inaccurate, but if you parse between their two extremes, more often than not you find that reality lies at the fulcrum.

    In this case, it is perfectly possible that the Arabs staged the Jenin massacres. But it also seems equally likely that they used bodies obtained from previous Israeli attacks. That is my assessment of the situation based upon these leftist and rightist tirades, of course. There may be additional evidence awaiting discussion, evidence which tends to cast doubt on one side or the other (or indeed, whether a massacre even occurred at all, staged or otherwise), but in the absence of additional evidence, it seems reasonable to put this idea forward as a starting point for discussion.

    So, Darrell and John S.: please tell me why it is unreasonable to propose the possibility that the Israelis did not massacre Arabs at Jenin, but that these bodies did, in fact, come from a previous Israeli massacre somewhere else, perhaps a cluster of smaller massacres manufactured into a large one for media convenience. Would such an accumulated atrocity be lessened or ameliorated by the deception which underlay its manufacture?

    I will evaluate your responses, and use them to attempt to reach a new consensus opinion on the subject. For now, can we at least agree that:

    1. Jenin exists.
    2. Israel attacked it.
    3. People died during this attack.
    4. Some of these people were Arabs.?

    If we can agree on all this, we can easily eliminate 95% of the potential disharmony we face on this controversial matter. I remain optimistic that an accord can be achieved with hard work, dedication, and mutual respect.

  153. 153.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 8:39 pm

    The left, by and large, is truly willing to divide and tear apart the country to achieve their political gain.

    Can you believe this fucking guy?

  154. 154.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 8:40 pm

    That is such an insult to idiots.

    I was going to call Darrell a fucktard, but I got a call last week from the Fucktard Association of America and they were offended at being compared to Darrell.

  155. 155.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:41 pm

    Krista Says:

    Regardless, for someone who has indicated that he is looking for honest debate, you certainly are very quick to bring the attack down to the personal level, I must say.

    yeah, I can see how quick you are to denounce all the bullshit accusations of racism coming from your side. Oh that’s right, you focus all your criticism on minor comments coming from me.. How honest and fair of you.

  156. 156.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 8:44 pm

    Judy, I realize it’s trendy to repeat those sort of accusations with all the kool kidz, but is Ma Caca really a racist epithet?

    What would the word be other than a ethnic slur?

    Or are you saying that it really means ‘buddy’ in Allenspeak, and we just weren’t in on the kool kidz secret language?

  157. 157.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:45 pm

    If we can agree on all this, we can easily eliminate 95% of the potential disharmony we face on this controversial matter

    No we can’t you fucking moron.. not as long as jackasses like John S are calling it an Israeli ‘war crime’, and while arab propagandists lie their asses off that “hundreds” in Jenin were massacred by Israel when in FACT it was a fraction of that number. Not even the UN disputes that.

  158. 158.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 8:45 pm

    Please, show of hands who has ever heard the term ‘Ma Cacca’ before? How many knew it was a racial epithet? Well then aholes, you certainly have a ‘valid’ accusation/smear then.

    Please a show of hands for all those who when they heard the word thought it was a polite address?

    Interesting argument you made there Darrell, but common sense prevails over wingnuttery.

  159. 159.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 8:46 pm

    See, Darrell thinks that if he has not heard the word, it’s not a word.

    So you think that just because sites like Stormfront use the epithet “macaque” along side other epithets like “nigger” it means “macaque” is racist? And when a person uses “macaque” to describe a brown skinned person at a campaign stump that means he’s using it as a racist epithet? Do you see how unhinged you are? Do you get it yet?

  160. 160.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 8:46 pm

    No we can’t you fucking moron.. not as long as jackasses like John S are calling it an Israeli ‘war crime’, and while arab propagandists lie their asses off that “hundreds” in Jenin were massacred by Israel when in FACT it was a fraction of that number. Not even the UN disputes that.

    Or the rabid Darrell’s of the right defend Macaca as a polite form of address between friends.

  161. 161.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 8:47 pm

    No we can’t you fucking moron.. not as long as jackasses like John S are calling it an Israeli ‘war crime’, and while arab propagandists lie their asses off that “hundreds” in Jenin were massacred by Israel when in FACT it was a fraction of that number. Not even the UN disputes that.

    Well, not with that attitude, certainly. But can you at least concede the four points I wrote up, Darrell? They would easily overcome 95% of the disagreement, I believe.

  162. 162.

    VidaLoca

    August 14, 2006 at 8:48 pm

    Darrell,

    Please, show of hands who has ever heard the term ‘Ma Cacca’ before? How many knew it was a racial epithet?

    Hey, I’m with you. It’s a revelation to me too.

    Well then aholes, you certainly have a ‘valid’ accusation/smear then.

    Well, either Allen was making it up as random gibberish or he meant something by it — maybe you can see another way of looking at it but I can’t. Point is, you can denounce him, say you were wrong and unaware of the meaning of the word, and we can flame on on a different topic. What’s so hard about that?

  163. 163.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:49 pm

    Or the rabid Darrell’s of the right defend Macaca as a polite form of address between friends.

    I never suggested it was ‘polite’ form of address, as Allen was clearly perterburbed by a member of his opponents campaign following him around with a video camera. But it wasn’t a racist insult either, no matter how much you dishonest jackasses pretend otherwise.

  164. 164.

    VidaLoca

    August 14, 2006 at 8:51 pm

    Oh that’s right, you focus all your criticism on minor comments coming from me.

    Darrell, come on. You really did kind of step right in it this time.

  165. 165.

    Ancient Purple

    August 14, 2006 at 8:51 pm

    But it wasn’t a racist insult either, no matter how much you dishonest jackasses pretend otherwise.

    Bigots will always defend each other until the bitter, bitter end.

  166. 166.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:52 pm

    Point is, you can denounce him, say you were wrong and unaware of the meaning of the word, and we can flame on on a different topic. What’s so hard about that?

    Note how liberal jackasses like chriskoz literally stalk people with false accusations of racism. Just look at this thread. It’s a hallmark trait of the left. Now Allen is being smeared with false accusations of racism. I agree that it’s a non-issue which should be dropped. Too bad the left can’t seem to ever let go

  167. 167.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 8:52 pm

    Only a moonbat would think Allen was being a racist. Do you see how unhinged you are? How dishonest? Do you get it yet?

  168. 168.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:52 pm

    Bigots will always defend each other until the bitter, bitter end.

    Exhibit A

  169. 169.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 8:53 pm

    I agree with Darrell. We should drop the Allen discussion and talk about Ned Lamont being the al Qaeda candidate. Strong. Smart. Honest.

  170. 170.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:53 pm

    Only a moonbat would think Allen was being a racist

    Exhibit B

  171. 171.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 8:54 pm

    You really did kind of step right in it this time.

    How so? Please be specific

  172. 172.

    srv

    August 14, 2006 at 8:55 pm

    Well, not with that attitude, certainly. But can you at least concede the four points I wrote up, Darrell? They would easily overcome 95% of the disagreement, I believe.

    You missed it, he disagreed and stated that it was a massacre, albiet a fractional one:

    were massacred by Israel when in FACT it was a fraction of that number. Not even the UN disputes that.

  173. 173.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 8:57 pm

    Please, show of hands who has ever heard the term ‘Ma Cacca’ before? How many knew it was a racial epithet?

    Hadn’t heard of it. Didn’t know it was a racial epithet. But didn’t insist that it wasn’t one, just because I hadn’t heard of it.

    And I’m not the net nanny, Darrell. I only commented on your rudeness because I seemed to recall you claiming earlier that you were only looking for debate, but were treated rudely by the lefties. And yes, you are treated rudely by many of the lefties here. I’ll admit that freely. Do I think they’re wrong to do so? Well…sometimes. But I can’t really sympathize with you, because you certainly don’t inspire kindess or neutrality, due to the sneering sarcasm you employ as a weapon. You make it very difficult for anybody to want to stick up for you, be it fair or not.

  174. 174.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 8:57 pm

    I never suggested it was ‘polite’ form of address, as Allen was clearly perterburbed by a member of his opponents campaign following him around with a video camera.

    So why Macaca? Why not asshole, jerk, fucktard?

    Why call the guy monkey boy… except using a word which is only associated with Indian subcontinent?

    Everybody who thinks Darrell’s explanation sounds intelligent and isn’t a desperate attempt to spin yell “Yeah Jesus!”

    Why do I hear crickets chirping?

  175. 175.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 8:58 pm

    And there you have it again. Leftists claim Darrell is a racist, Darrell staunchly denies it. The record speaks against him, yet not conclusively. Obviously, people are overreacting, but how much? Can we or can we not come to some kind of consensus on this difficult issue?

    Personally, I’ll give Darrell the benefit of the doubt to a far greater extent than leftist partisans with an axe to grind against him are likely to. Darrell, what are your thoughts on why these accusations occur?

  176. 176.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 8:58 pm

    How so? Please be specific

    I think VidaLoca meant you stepped in the macaque, or ground dwelling monkey, as it is known in some circles.

  177. 177.

    VidaLoca

    August 14, 2006 at 8:59 pm

    Darrell,

    How so? Please be specific

    That would be because it’s not a racist epithet.. it’s not even a word, I think. But don’t let those inconvenient details stop you from accusing Allen of racism. Party over country, right?

  178. 178.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:00 pm

    You missed it, he disagreed and stated that it was a massacre, albiet a fractional one

    :

    You’re right, I did miss that one. It appears that Darrell has already met John S. more or less halfway. I consider this a victory for compromise and common sense.

    I have to say, Darrell is being far more rational and reasonable than most of his accusers here.

  179. 179.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 9:00 pm

    except using a word which is only associated with Indian subcontinent?

    It’s also used to refer to North Africans. Why is the left so dishonest?

  180. 180.

    The Other Steve

    August 14, 2006 at 9:00 pm

    Ahh. Interesting Tunisian French link…

    George Felix Allen sounds more French than John Kerry.

  181. 181.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 9:03 pm

    You missed it, he disagreed and stated that it was a massacre, albiet a fractional one:

    It was a mistatement in the context of pointing out the wild exaggerations made by lying arab propagandists. I don’t consider Jenin a “massacre” at all. It was Israeli troops fighting terrorists door-to-door, knowing they would lose soldiers rather than turn Jenin into glass, which was fully within their power. I believe something like 23 Israeli soldiers died and 55 arabs. From what I’ve read, almost all of the arab dead were male of fighting age. No doubt most were terrorists dying while trying to kill israelis.

  182. 182.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 9:05 pm

    lying arab propagandists

    I could point out the offensiveness of that statement if someone did:

    s/arab/jew/

    But Darrell wouldn’t get it.

  183. 183.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 9:08 pm

    I could point out the offensiveness of that statement if someone did:

    But is really was lying arab propagandists that set up the Jenin fraud to disgrace Israel.

  184. 184.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:09 pm

    It was a mistatement in the context of pointing out the wild exaggerations made by lying arab propagandists. I don’t consider Jenin a “massacre” at all. It was Israeli troops fighting terrorists door-to-door, knowing they would lose soldiers rather than turn Jenin into glass, which was fully within their power. I believe something like 23 Israeli soldiers died and 55 arabs. From what I’ve read, almost all of the arab dead were male of fighting age. No doubt most were terrorists dying while trying to kill israelis.

    Well, it sounds like Darrell has already conceded points 1-4. Where’s John S.? I want to hear his take on all this.

  185. 185.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 9:10 pm

    Curiously, GOP4me has disappeared right when the USP spoof appeared.

  186. 186.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 9:11 pm

    But is really was lying arab propagandists that set up the Jenin fraud to disgrace Israel.

    Like I said, you wouldn’t get it.

  187. 187.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 9:13 pm

    almost all of the arab dead were male of fighting age.

    Good kills, then. No worries about the game warden writing you up.

  188. 188.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:13 pm

    I could point out the offensiveness of that statement if someone did:

    But is really was lying arab propagandists that set up the Jenin fraud to disgrace Israel.

    So, would it be an acceptable compromise if we agreed that not all of these propogandists were Arabs? I’m sure some of them were leftists, and some of them might even have been Iranian conservatives. Iranians, as you all undoubtedly know, are not Arabs.

    I just think if we could reach a middle point instead of fighting all the time, a lot more could be accomplished around here. Maybe Darrell’s right. Maybe they ARE exclusively Arab propogandists. Maybe Darrell’s wrong, and none of the propogandists were Arabs. But if we can’t wait for all the facts to come in, and we’re unwilling to compromise on the matter, can we at least agree to disagree in the meanwhile? I think things would go a lot more swimmingly around this place!

  189. 189.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:15 pm

    Curiously, GOP4me has disappeared right when the USP spoof appeared.

    Curiously, so did Mac Buckets. Is there a connection? I leave it to you, and scs, to hash out the paranoid conspiracy theories.

    And where did Brian go? Curiously, he stopped posting here around the same time the folks at Scrutator outed themselves. Was Brian really DougJ? I’m assigning you the case, Detective Darrell!

  190. 190.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 9:18 pm

    But if we can’t wait for all the facts to come in, and we’re unwilling to compromise on the matter, can we at least agree to disagree in the meanwhile? I think things would go a lot more swimmingly around this place!

    1. It would make for a much less lively comments section.
    2. Aren’t we still “waiting for all the facts” in regards to the Bush administration’s response to Katrina? Shall we keep waiting before formulating an opinion, then?
    3. We DO agree to disagree. As you can see, many of us here have a long-term agreement to disagree with each other at every opportunity.

  191. 191.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 9:18 pm

    And where did Brian go? Curiously, he stopped posting here around the same time the folks at Scrutator outed themselves.

    You seem to know an awful about this blog for someone who just started posting here. Fucking spoof.

  192. 192.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 9:19 pm

    Hey, that’s right! Brian never came back from his two-week ban. I believe I shall shed a little tear for the man who called rape victims “theoretical”.

  193. 193.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:20 pm

    Good kills, then. No worries about the game warden writing you up.

    I disagree with hunting laws. We have far too many deer in this country. With a distinct shortage of wolves and bears to take care of the problem, it’s up to America’s hunters to protect American motorists from nighttime collissions with these gigantic woodland vermin.

    Sure, some hunting laws for human safety are probably necessary. But do we really need to worry about the deer population at this point? Sure, we could keep checking up on them, and maybe in 4 or 5 years depopulation would be a problem. Then we could reintroduce strict hunting bans, if that seemed necessary to the voters and the forestry officials they elect (directly or otherwise). But for now, I think it should be open season on deer, every season.

    Would anyone care to differ with this assertion? If so, please state your rationale.

  194. 194.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:21 pm

    1. It would make for a much less lively comments section.

    Less lively, but more rewarding intellectually.

    2. Aren’t we still “waiting for all the facts” in regards to the Bush administration’s response to Katrina? Shall we keep waiting before formulating an opinion, then?

    Yes, if necessary.

    3. We DO agree to disagree. As you can see, many of us here have a long-term agreement to disagree with each other at every opportunity.

    But you do it so rudely! Is that really necessary?

  195. 195.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 9:21 pm

    Darrell – there ARE quite a few lurkers on this blog. I lurked for a good few weeks before saying anything, and I’m sure I’m not unique in that aspect. He might be a spoof, but maybe we should wait for all the facts to come in. :)

  196. 196.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 9:21 pm

    I believe I shall shed a little tear for the man who called rape victims “theoretical”.

    Yeah, but we have the real deal:

    “It cannot be proven that the civilians were innocent.”

    –Darrell

  197. 197.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:22 pm

    You seem to know an awful about this blog for someone who just started posting here. Fucking spoof.

    If lurking were as criminal as loitering, I would’ve started posting a lot sooner.

    You seem to know very little about this blog for someone who’s been posting here for so long. Is “Darrell” one person, or a collaborative effort by a number of writers?

  198. 198.

    US Patriot

    August 14, 2006 at 9:23 pm

    Darrell – there ARE quite a few lurkers on this blog. I lurked for a good few weeks before saying anything, and I’m sure I’m not unique in that aspect. He might be a spoof, but maybe we should wait for all the facts to come in

    Exactly.

    It may be inappropriate for me to point this out, but Darrell is awfully extremist and hostile and rude. I think it hinders discussion around here.

  199. 199.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 9:24 pm

    2. Aren’t we still “waiting for all the facts” in regards to the Bush administration’s response to Katrina? Shall we keep waiting before formulating an opinion, then?

    Yes, if necessary.

    You must be an awfully frustrating date. “Did you enjoy dinner?” “Well, some may have enjoyed that dish, but others may not have. I’m going to wait until it’s thoroughly digested and evacuated before deciding.”

    3. We DO agree to disagree. As you can see, many of us here have a long-term agreement to disagree with each other at every opportunity.

    But you do it so rudely! Is that really necessary?

    Necessary? Probably not. Frustrating? At times. Diverting? Always.

  200. 200.

    Perry Como

    August 14, 2006 at 9:24 pm

    He might be a spoof, but maybe we should wait for all the facts to come in.

    I don’t think there is a consensus on US Patriot being a spoof. Back in the 70s people were saying that US Patriot was not a spoof. Now they are saying he is spoof. There’s even a petition by some well known blog commentors that say there’s no such thing as spoofing.

  201. 201.

    Krista

    August 14, 2006 at 9:26 pm

    It may be inappropriate for me to point this out, but Darrell is awfully extremist and hostile and rude. I think it hinders discussion around here.

    Au contraire. It actually tends to create quite a bit of discussion. As to whether that discussion is productive is another matter…

  202. 202.

    DougJ

    August 14, 2006 at 9:27 pm

    I found Marc Gellman’s piece in Newsweek on “Joe and the Jews” more offensive than Allen’s racial slurs. Check it out.

  203. 203.

    ThymeZone

    August 14, 2006 at 9:39 pm

    Would anyone care to differ with this assertion? If so, please state your rationale.

    Please Google the term “whoosh.”

  204. 204.

    chriskoz

    August 14, 2006 at 9:40 pm

    Nothing lame about it shitstain. In the context of a discussion in which “John S” was using Jenin as an example of Israeli “war crimes”, I pointed out to him in response that Jenin was in fact a fraud perpetrated by arab lies to disgrace Israel. Nothing racist or dishonest in the least with my characterization of it as such. That was exactly what it was. That is the basis for your accusation of me being a racist? you’re really standing on ‘solid’ ground with that accusations shitstain, let me tell you.

    Really Darrell…. that’s the best defense you can produce? Repeat your childish insult and then link to a Wikipedia entry? Please show me where it says “Arab lies” in your link? No Darrell… that racist interpretation is entirely yours. (Note: I’m not claiming that “no one” lied. Please see the discussion in the previously linked thread for examples of how you could have accurately portrayed who was actually lying without being racist about it.)

    So… yes… that is a big part of my reasons for calling you a racist… you choose to smear an entire race as liars. And then you foolishly try to defend the comment as if it was “accurate”. What would you call someone who intentionally chooses to smear an entire race?

    Think of it this way… if your statement had included the phrase “Jew lies” or “Negro lies” do you think you would be able to sit there and honestly pretend you are not a racist?
    (Wait… didn’t you also make a some broad claim of most Jews being “stupid and naive” too? I’ll see if I can find the post to help refresh your memory.)

    Also… simply because I choose to spend some time with my family for a bit instead of monitor this board for your latest stupid comment hardly qualifies as “running like a cockroach”. See Darrell, as much fun as it is to make you look like a fool, there actually are more important things in my life.

  205. 205.

    Vlad

    August 14, 2006 at 10:16 pm

    I will admit that the “it’s OK to call brown people monkeys if they aren’t actually from Africa” defense is pretty amusing, though still despicable.

  206. 206.

    Vlad

    August 14, 2006 at 10:18 pm

    Still not quite as funny as Allen’s claim that he was talking about the kid’s haircut, though.

  207. 207.

    demimondian

    August 14, 2006 at 10:34 pm

    Our very own libertopian, USPharmaceutica, says:

    I disagree with hunting laws. We have far too many deer in this country. With a distinct shortage of wolves and bears to take care of the problem, it’s up to America’s hunters to protect American motorists from nighttime collissions with these gigantic woodland vermin.

    You are not a very good Liebertarian if you believe that. There are other, far better, ways to reduce the deer population.

    We could, for instance, spray the border areas of forests with deer-specific poisons. We could create giant, deer-killing robots, which would stalk the overgrown Bambini with mercifully quick tranq darts. We could simply burn down the unAmerican forests which are giving cover to the deer; this would have the advantage of protecting American hunters from each other.

  208. 208.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 10:37 pm

    So… yes… that is a big part of my reasons for calling you a racist… you choose to smear an entire race as liars

    I didn’t “smear an entire race” as liars you lying sack of shit. Jenin was a fraud resulting from arab lies to disgrace Israel. No where did I post that ALL arabs are liars (or perhaps you can show us?), hence your designation as truly a lying shitstain. Now that you’ve been called out on your lie, you’re scrambling like a cockroach

  209. 209.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 10:45 pm

    Krista Says:

    Darrell – there ARE quite a few lurkers on this blog. I lurked for a good few weeks before saying anything, and I’m sure I’m not unique in that aspect.

    Anything is possible. But he knows too many details dating back months. Furthermore, if this isn’t B-grade GOP4Me spoof material, I don’t know what is:

    So, would it be an acceptable compromise if we agreed that not all of these propogandists were Arabs? I’m sure some of them were leftists, and some of them might even have been Iranian conservatives. Iranians, as you all undoubtedly know, are not Arabs

    Closing argument, the alias “US Patriot”. It’s so cartoonish, and fits too perfectly with the simpleton leftist caricatured view of conservatives.. wouldn’t you agree? Definitely a spoof, and not a very bright one.

  210. 210.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 10:49 pm

    (Wait… didn’t you also make a some broad claim of most Jews being “stupid and naive” too? I’ll see if I can find the post to help refresh your memory.)

    Please do. You’ve been busted once on this thread for lying. Go for broke. I want everyone to see for themselves what you consider a ‘broad claim’ from me saying that “most” Jews are stupid and naive. Show us that one shitstain so they can see for themselves what you are.

  211. 211.

    John S.

    August 14, 2006 at 11:19 pm

    No we can’t you fucking moron.. not as long as jackasses like John S are calling it an Israeli ‘war crime’

    Wow, it looks like I worked my into Darrell’s fragile psyche.

    I know you hate Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, but do we really need to re-hash this again?

  212. 212.

    John S.

    August 14, 2006 at 11:36 pm

    So, Darrell and John S.: please tell me why it is unreasonable to propose the possibility that the Israelis did not massacre Arabs at Jenin

    Jenin is actually quite simple, unless you’re looking to push an agenda. The bottom line is:

    -52 Palestinians were killed (30 Palestinian militants, 22 Palestinian civilians) and 23 Israeli soldiers were killed

    – In the immediate aftermath, the Palestinians (specifically) alleged that there was a massacre of civilians much greater and gave inflated body counts to make Israel look bad in the press

    – Following the immediate aftermath it was determined by two separate organizations in independent reports that while the Palestinian claims were false, Israel was guilty of violating the Geneva Conventions

    – The reports also cited that Palestinian gunmen did endanger Palestinian civilians in the camp by using it as a base, however this did not detract from the IDF’s obligations under international humanitarian law

    – Attempts by the UN to investigate the matter were effectively blocked by Israel, and On May 7, 2002 the UN General Assembly condemned both the “assaults against Palestinians by Israeli occupying forces, particularly in the Jenin refugee camp” and the refusal to cooperate with fact-finding team

    And that’s pretty much the story. Therefore, while it may be unreasonable to say that there was a “massacre” at Jenin, it is equally fraudulent to claim that Israel was the only real “victim” of the situation.

  213. 213.

    Ancient Purple

    August 14, 2006 at 11:46 pm

    Well, well.

    Sen. George Felix Allen has now issued an apology for his calling an American citizen of South Asian descent a “Macaca.”

    The money quote:

    Asked what macaca means, Allen said: “I don’t know what it means.” He said the word sounds similar to “mohawk,” a term that his campaign staff had nicknamed Sidarth because of his haircut. Sidarth said his hairstyle is a mullet — tight on top, long in the back.

    What a baldfaced lie.

    Bigots always lie when they get caught.

    Isn’t that right, Darrell?

  214. 214.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 11:47 pm

    And that’s pretty much the story. Therefore, while it may be unreasonable to say that there was a “massacre” at Jenin, it is equally fraudulent to claim that Israel was the only real “victim” of the situation

    Your initial description of what happened at Jenin was an Israeli “war crime”. Clearly you are backpeddling from that earlier characterization of yours

    Attempts by the UN to investigate the matter were effectively blocked by Israel

    Let’s examine what constitutes an Israeli “block”

    To settle the contradictory claims, a fact finding mission was proposed by the United Nations on April 19 2002. Israel initially agreed to co-operate with the inquiry, but demanded a set of conditions to do so. Among the conditions, Israel demanded that the mission should include anti-terrorism experts (this was supported by one Amnesty International advisor[38]), that the UN agree not to prosecute Israeli soldiers for potential violations of international law, and that it limit its scope exclusively to events in Jenin.

    The UN refused to accept the last two conditions and were forced to ultimately disband their mission

    How irrational of those Israelis to demand such reasonable conditions. They BLOCKED the UN investigation!

  215. 215.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 11:51 pm

    Bigots always lie when they get caught.

    Isn’t that right, Darrell?

    And dishonorable liberal vermin routinely accuse political opponents of racism without basis. Isn’t that right AP? How ancient are you anyway?

  216. 216.

    chriskoz

    August 14, 2006 at 11:52 pm

    I didn’t “smear an entire race” as liars you lying sack of shit. Jenin was a fraud resulting from arab lies to disgrace Israel. No where did I post that ALL arabs are liars (or perhaps you can show us?), hence your designation as truly a lying shitstain. Now that you’ve been called out on your lie, you’re scrambling like a cockroach

    Ok Darrell… now you’re just being silly. How am I scrambling like a cockroach? I have repeatedly replied to your posts with rather directed responses. (True… I did take time with my family, so some responses were slow. But really? Are you that dense?) Hell, I even mentioned that you tried to use this laughable “Jane Hamshers of the left” defense when we first covered your racist comments.

    So it would seem that I am doing anything BUT scrambling like a cockroach.

    Meanwhile… you have presented no better argument in your favor than you did last time and almost immediately resorted a childish “shitstain” taunt. (An apparent favorite)

    You have had plenty of chances to amend your statement to accurately identify those who were lying. Yet, the best you can come up with is “Arab lies”?

    It’s simple… just because some Arabs lied, does not mean the lies are “Arab lies”. Any more than… because some Jews have lied at some point, it’s “ok” to label them “Jew lies”.

    Darrell, you choose to use the “race” label for a reason. We know it’s NOT for the sake of accuracy. Since “Arab” does in fact refer to an entire race. And there are certainly more accurate choices. (See previous thread) So why is it “Arab” lies?

    Now, an adult would think on why he/she MUST use the “race” to identify the lies. And then would either present a lucid argument or apologize for their racist comment.

    A child would post about how I’m a lying shitstain who scrambles like a cockroach from the light of your thier wisdom.

    Trust me… the child ends up looking like a fool.

  217. 217.

    Darrell

    August 14, 2006 at 11:58 pm

    Vlad Says:

    Still not quite as funny as Allen’s claim that he was talking about the kid’s haircut, though.

    The kid has a mullet haircut. No wonder he feels at home with the Dem party

  218. 218.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:01 am

    Ok Darrell… now you’re just being silly

    You got caught lying about what I said, dishonestly characterizing me as a ‘racist’. Then you lie again saying that I said “most” jews are stupid and naive. When challenged to produce the quote, you run like a fucking cockroach, and declare such requests “silly”. Show us my quote, in context, so you can be exposed for a liar again.

  219. 219.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:04 am

    It’s simple… just because some Arabs lied, does not mean the lies are “Arab lies”.

    It is entirely accurate to point out that the Jenin fraud was entirely the result of arab lies. That is very different than the quotes you dishonestly attribute to me, claiming that I said “all” arabs are liars. Do you see what a dishonest scumbag you are? Has it dawned on you yet?

  220. 220.

    demimondian

    August 15, 2006 at 12:05 am

    I hate to agree with John S., but…that really is what seems to have happened at Jenin.

  221. 221.

    chriskoz

    August 15, 2006 at 12:05 am

    So… you are going with “child”?

  222. 222.

    ImJohnGalt

    August 15, 2006 at 12:09 am

    Darrell’s pregnant? With child?

  223. 223.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:09 am

    You have had plenty of chances to amend your statement to accurately identify those who were lying.

    Pardon me, but it is entirely accurate to identify those who were lying as arabs. Palestinian arabs to be specific. They lied their asses off to disgrace Israel. That arab lies about Jenin constitute lies and fraud really isn’t in dispute, so I don’t understand why you feel obligated to play the race card. You’re obsessed really, following me from thread to the thread with dishonest accusations of racism.. How ‘adult’ of you.

  224. 224.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:12 am

    I hate to agree with John S., but…that really is what seems to have happened at Jenin.

    Yeah? Then explain for us how Israel going door to door to root out terrorists when they could have glassed the city.. 23 of Israel’s finest killed vs. 50 something Palestinians. Explain demi, how that constitutes an Israeli “war crime” as John S initially claimed (he has now completely modified his initial characterization)

  225. 225.

    ImJohnGalt

    August 15, 2006 at 12:13 am

    Oho, so now Darrell is backpeddling (sic). Originally, he said “arab lies”, now he’s saying “Palestinian arabs”. Skedaddle like a centipede under a flashlight, shitstain. Look at the right in all its glory. That’s who they are. Bunch of fucking race-baiters. I can’t wait until November – when America sees the wacky right for who they are, I like the Democrats’ chances.

    Man, it’s hard to even mimic that kind of vitriol. You have a dark soul indeed, Darrell.

  226. 226.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:14 am

    You have a dark soul indeed, Darrell

    Projection is the hallmark of the left

  227. 227.

    Ancient Purple

    August 15, 2006 at 12:17 am

    Let’s put Sen. Allen’s “explanation” to the test.

    Here is a photo of Mr. T who sported a Mohawk haircut through his “Rocky” film and A-Team TV careers.

    Now, here is a photo of Billy Ray Cyrus, best known for his hit “Achy Breaky Heart” sporting a Mullet hairstyle.

    My goodness. They are identical.

    Except they are not.

    Only an idiot could claim those haircuts are similar.

  228. 228.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:20 am

    Let’s put Sen. Allen’s “explanation” to the test.

    Obsessed and unhinged. Typical leftist

  229. 229.

    Ancient Purple

    August 15, 2006 at 12:21 am

    And dishonorable liberal vermin routinely accuse political opponents of racism without basis. Isn’t that right AP?

    Uh, Darrell? I didn’t say you were a racist. Yet.

    I said you were a bigot. They are not the same thing.

  230. 230.

    ImJohnGalt

    August 15, 2006 at 12:22 am

    Projection is the hallmark of the left

    Damn, I knew I forgot a few of your macros. Got any others for my text editor? Perhaps we could just get John to add them to the buttons at the top of editbox, so you could alienate and insult people with a more ruthless efficiency.

    Seriously, Darrell – eat a bag of dicks.

  231. 231.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:23 am

    chriskoz runs like a cockroach when challenged to produce my alleged quote that “most jews are stupid”. You leftist aholes are too predictable.

  232. 232.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 12:24 am

    Seriously, Darrell – eat a bag of dicks.

    Talk about dark souls…

  233. 233.

    Ancient Purple

    August 15, 2006 at 12:28 am

    Seriously, Darrell – eat a bag of dicks.

    He can’t just yet. Jeff Gannon has another “job” first.

  234. 234.

    ImJohnGalt

    August 15, 2006 at 12:34 am

    Ah yes, moral equivalence is another piece of your stock-in-trade, Darrell.

    My insult to you to “eat a bag of dicks” darkens my soul. I think, however, that it a slightly lighter tint than that accumulated in yours for the way that you slur the left, naive Jews, lying arabs, and gay scoutmasters. I’m sure that St. Peter will marvel at your remarkable inability to respond to people who attempt to engage you in real discussion with anything other than profanity and ignorance. Yea, the Lord himself will sing hosannahs to you for the credence with which you swallow without chewing anything you see on Fox News or the White House briefing office.

    I’ll happily submit our souls to the scales of the Maker. I daresay it won’t be mine that will be found wanting.

  235. 235.

    Ancient Purple

    August 15, 2006 at 12:42 am

    The Washington Post decided to write an editorial about Allen’s slur.

    George Allen can’t be happy. Then again, he made a racial slur against an American citizen of color, so perhaps he is gleefully happy at his own words.

    We have no inkling as to what Mr. Allen meant by “Macaca,” though we rather doubt his campaign’s imaginative explanation that it was somehow an allusion to Mr. Sidarth’s hairstyle, a mullet. Mr. Allen said last night that no slur was intended, though he failed to explain what, exactly, he did have in mind. Macaca is the genus for macaques, a type of monkey found mainly in Asia. Mr. Allen, who as a young man had a fondness for Confederate flags and later staunchly opposed a state holiday in honor of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., has surely learned too much about racial sensitivities in public life to misspeak so offensively.

    Sen. George Felix Allen: Official Douchebag of the United States Senate.

  236. 236.

    ImJohnGalt

    August 15, 2006 at 12:50 am

    Oh, and by the way, congratulations, Tom in Texas. Good luck.

  237. 237.

    chriskoz

    August 15, 2006 at 1:17 am

    You are asking to know on what basis I’m calling you a racist. I’m trying to explain it to you. And you clearly can’t see that. So… I guess that makes me obsessed?

    And since I only commented to show your hipocrisy after you got on your soapbox about racism. I’m not sure how that means I’m playing the race card.

    Having gone back even futher, I have been able to find the “stupid and naive” comment. (sorry it took so long. But, it gave you a good reason to use some of the “childish” taunts again) And yes, it does appear I was mistaken on that comment. You did not say “Most” Jews are “stupid and naive”. And I retract the comment I made to that effect and apologize.

    What you actually said was “A number of Jews are in fact stupid and naive to the extreme” (here’s your link) which I guess would mean you respect the Jews enough not to smear them all. So it seems even odder that you don’t appear to be able to see the Arabs that way? But, I guess “Palestinian arabs” is progress.

  238. 238.

    chriskoz

    August 15, 2006 at 1:25 am

    opps… hypocrisy. not hipocrisy.

  239. 239.

    US Patriot

    August 15, 2006 at 2:57 am

    This has become boring and tiresome. I’m done with Darrell.

    I’ve decided that he’s some sort of Divine Retribution forced upon the partisan leftists of this blog for your extremism. You’ve earned the man, so you deal with him. Right now I feel like I’m playing the Innocent Bystander character in a Mexican standoff situation. Lurking is far easier.

    BTW, Darrell, you’re very paranoid about this GOP4Me person. Is he the same person as DougJ and ThymeZone? Could he also be scs? Inquiring minds want to know.

    Anyway, back to lurking. It’s the only honorable profession around here.

  240. 240.

    US Patriot

    August 15, 2006 at 3:00 am

    Oh, one last thing. Demimondian:

    You are not a very good Liebertarian if you believe that. There are other, far better, ways to reduce the deer population.

    I never said I was a Libertarian. Don’t tar me with that brush. Libertarians are anti-statist loons, the counterbalancing force to Fascists in our society. Both sides being equally ridiculous, silly, and wrong, I would never join either.

    Honestly, I’m not even sure if it’s worth LURKING around you people. Teaching a pet rock to fetch the stick is more productive than talking to most of you.

    Have a nice life (except Darrell- may the collaborative team of non-consulting extremists writing your part have nice separate lives).

  241. 241.

    John S.

    August 15, 2006 at 7:01 am

    Your initial description of what happened at Jenin was an Israeli “war crime”. Clearly you are backpeddling from that earlier characterization of yours.

    Darrell, you lying sack of shit.

    I said the EXACT same thing the first time, so there is no backpeddling whatsoever. The problem is, you didn’t get it the last time either:

    You wave Jenin around like a banner to highlight the willingness of extremists to stage atrocities while ignoring that the same incident highlighted Israel’s complete disregard for human rights and the safety of civilians.

    But keep screaming that I just glibly described the situation as a “war crime” and have somehow changed my original position. I urge anyone to follow the link and read the exchange to see just how full of shit Darrell really is to walk away from that having mischaracterized my position entirely.

  242. 242.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 7:37 am

    Darrell wrote:

    Projection is the hallmark of the left

    LOL! :-)

    Ok, fess up. You’re a spoof aren’t you?

  243. 243.

    The Other Steve

    August 15, 2006 at 7:38 am

    Asked what macaca means, Allen said: “I don’t know what it means.” He said the word sounds similar to “mohawk,” a term that his campaign staff had nicknamed Sidarth because of his haircut. Sidarth said his hairstyle is a mullet—tight on top, long in the back.

    George Felix Allen doesn’t know what a mullet is?

    How can he claim to be a son of the south?

  244. 244.

    chopper

    August 15, 2006 at 8:13 am

    ‘macaque’ is french slang for ‘monkey’ in the manner of a racial slur. allen knows french, BTW, and his mom is from tunisia where it’s a common term.

    but no, he totally just made the word up on the spot. outta nowhere.

  245. 245.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 9:09 am

    Guess what, Darrell. You were wrong again.

    That nice little war you so assiduously defended? Accomplished nothing.

    The stated reasons for it, and objectives, when it started? All lies, and bullshit. Just like I said.

    The nonsense about “precise targeting” to avoid civilian casualties? Lies. Many more civilians than combatants were killed. A third of them children according to the bulk of the reports. Children bombed in their sleep, by liars, for political purposes …. to make a point. Just like I said. And you were there rooting for the murderers every fucking step of the way.

    What’s more, you’ll find that the United States was in on the whole thing from the get go. You’ll find that the border skirmish that “started” it was nothing more than a trigger for an operation already planned and ready to go, just waiting for a provocation.

    You’ll find that these Israeli turds in suits, in cahoots with American turds in suits, ginned up a useless war which caused a rain of rockets to be sent down upon their own people every day and night for a month … basically, for nothing but a political agenda.

    If you keep reading, you’ll find that air war is nothing but mechanized terrorism, and always has been. Its entire purpose is to terrorize civilian populations to achieve goals that cannot be gained through armed and uniformed combat between warriors. You’ll find that terms like “collateral damage” are somescreens for sociopathic schemes that employ the terrorism of air war to achieve their ends. If you ever actually gain a mind or a soul, you’ll find out that there is no excuse for bombing children in their sleep or burning the faces off eight-year-olds in front of their mothers. Not even your deranged and inflated view of your own absolute rightness can excuse something like that.

    But anyway, now that there’s a lull in the carnage, why don’t you write a nice long essay about how this war in Lebanon has accomplished great things for Israel and the US? Especially the part about how Hezbollah has been elevated in the eyes of every Arab on earth by the bungling idiots in Israel, and how American and Israeli interests have been harmed for the next twenty years now thanks to these ham-handed murdering fuckers?

    Please go ahead. But don’t take too long, because the assholes who want war are still at work trying to gin up a lil’ sumpin’ sumpin’ in time for the American elections. They want to get their rumble on with Iran and Syria and make more fearmonger and warmonger speeches to Americans who need to be distracted from the collossal fuckup that was the last war these guys got us into.

  246. 246.

    Mac Buckets

    August 15, 2006 at 9:16 am

    Curiously, so did Mac Buckets. Is there a connection?

    Huh?

    Do you need something, USP?

  247. 247.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 9:53 am

    If you keep reading, you’ll find that air war is nothing but mechanized terrorism, and always has been. Its entire purpose is to terrorize civilian populations to achieve goals that cannot be gained through armed and uniformed combat between warriors

    What does the war in Afghanistan against Al Queda and Taliban have to do with this discussion?

  248. 248.

    John S.

    August 15, 2006 at 10:42 am

    What does the war in Afghanistan against Al Queda and Taliban have to do with this discussion?

    You call the bullshit you pull here a discussion?

    Interesting.

  249. 249.

    mrmobi

    August 15, 2006 at 12:27 pm

    The term ‘macaque’–also pronounced ‘mukakkah’–is a commonly used racial slur on par with the word ‘nigger’ in the united states.

    In Europe, the word ‘macaque’ is largely a racial slur used to insult people of North African descent. It is roughly synonomous with ‘dirty arab.’

    So George Allen got caught in his lie. Good. Now that he has apologized (kind of), would Gruppenfuhrer Darrell care to acknowledge that he’s an idiot?

    Thymezone:

    Mechanized terrorism, indeed. Like the firebombing of Dresden, which I believe killed more people than the Hiroshima bomb. I assume you’ve read “Slaughterhouse Five” by Kurt Vonnegut. The descriptions of bodies being removed afterward are excruciating. I believe Vonnegut was actually there, doing the work he describes. It reads like it left a mark.

    Arguments can, and have, been made that the bombing of Dresden wasn’t necessary. It was done largely to make things easier for the Soviet army. Even Churchill had second throughts about the bombing campaign, saying:

    “It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed. Otherwise we shall come into control of an utterly ruined land… The destruction of Dresden remains a serious query against the conduct of Allied bombing. I am of the opinion that military objectives must henceforward be more strictly studied in our own interests than that of the enemy.
    The Foreign Secretary has spoken to me on this subject, and I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives such as oil and communications behind the immediate battle-zone, rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction, however impressive.

    Churchill sounds kind of like a flip-flopper there, no? I wonder how he would have fared against the likes of Rove & Co.? At least this carnage occurred during an actual war, not some ginned-up fantasy struggle better handled by good police work, as the Brits have recently shown.

    So we’ve had ourselves another useless war in the middle-east, being careful to wait until we could attain a “sustainable” solution. The chess pieces have been moved around. Now it appears we were deeply involved in the planning of this one, too. No wonder we are so loved in the Arab world.

    So all those innocent children in Lebanon were burned up, why, exactly? Oh, sorry, I’m reminded that it’s impossible to prove they were innocent by Gruppenfuhrer Darrell. Good to know. Life would be so much more complicated without Darrell and the National Socialist Party.

  250. 250.

    John S.

    August 15, 2006 at 12:46 pm

    Now that he has apologized (kind of), would Gruppenfuhrer Darrell care to acknowledge that he’s an idiot?

    Gruppenfuhrer Darrell would first have to acknowledge that he is an idiot.

  251. 251.

    mrmobi

    August 15, 2006 at 1:01 pm

    Thank you, John S. I misspoke.

    I should have said “Now that Allen has apologized (kind of), would Gruppenfuhrer Darrell care to acknowledge that he came to the defense of a racist idiot?”
    By the way, sports fans, is George Allen of the generation that played the game sans helmet?

    It would explain a few things.

  252. 252.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 1:37 pm

    would Gruppenfuhrer Darrell

    Godwin asshole

  253. 253.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 1:43 pm

    You call the bullshit you pull here a discussion?

    My point is/was that Thyme has no problem with all the innocent “collateral damage” resulting form Afghanistan or the bombings in the Balkans. But Israel inflicting collateral damage on innocents while fighting terrorists who choose to hide among civilians? Well, that’s a horrible atrocity that could only be defended by child murderers? Do you see what dishonest hypocrites you vermin are?

  254. 254.

    demimondian

    August 15, 2006 at 2:01 pm

    Ok, Gruppenfuhrer Darrell, Godwin Asshole.

  255. 255.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 2:06 pm

    Well, that’s a horrible atrocity that could only be defended

    No atrocity can be morally defended. But that doesn’t stop you from trying to do just that.

    You did, and do now, defend the bombing of children in their sleep and burning the faces off eight-year olds in front of their mothers.

    Stamp your feet all day, scream about some other atrocity as the excuse for it, doesn’t change a thing. You defend the slaughter of children, by liars, for political purposes, and then try to put up a smokescreen.

    You are dirt.

  256. 256.

    ThymeZone

    August 15, 2006 at 2:11 pm

    Arguments can, and have, been made that the bombing of Dresden wasn’t necessary

    “Necessary” is a stretch that I am not willing to make.

    “Unavoidable” in some grotesquely extreme cases, due mostly to politics more than military necessity, is about as far as I will go, and then only under the greatest pressure. But never, never necessary.

    But even when you factor in the inavoidable tragic nature of war and politics, you don’t have moral justification.

    There is no moral justification for terrorism, and air warfare is terrorism. A lot of people have put a lot of energy and words into calling it … or getting other people to call it … something else.

    But it’s terrorism, plain and simple. Whether it’s a Katyusha rocket or an American airplane, if the weapon is aimed at civilians, it’s terrorism.

  257. 257.

    mrmobi

    August 15, 2006 at 2:42 pm

    Gruppenfuhrer Darrell: Thymezone is more than capable of defending himself, but you really don’t know what you are talking about, do you?

    Yes, there was “collateral damage” in the Balkans, as well as Afghanistan, but no, I’m pretty sure Thymezone has the same objection to those incidents as he does with the Israeli/Hezbollah conflict. No reasonable human being wants innocent children to be incinerated.

    But what has gone on here is more calculation than stupidity. As we now know from Sy Hersh, well before the IDF soldiers were kidnapped, the Israelis had mapped out this war, they even came here to get the green light from Cheney. (not from the President, who was included after the fact) This is how your marvelous anti-terror administration is making things better, by effectively making the US such a pariah in the region that we can’t have any influence on a meaningful peace effort. This administration doesn’t believe in the UN, so they don’t make any real effort. All plans revolve around the use of force.

    Take, for example, the bombing of the UN observation post. I must reluctantly agree with Koffi Annan that the UN outpost was deliberately targeted. It appears our Israeli friends were sending a message that they don’t want any observers too close. Mistakes happen in war, but if I had to bet, I’d say this was intentional.
    Before you go off on one of your diatribes and call me a bigot, be assured that I, like most Americans, and like most here, believe in Israel’s right to exist. That doesn’t give the IDF a free pass to incinerate women and children. A real president would confront Israel on these excesses. A real president would be personally involved with all major players regardless of their status as members of some bullshit axis of evil.

    Instead, we get “you are either with us or with the terrorists.” Instead, we get terror alerts whenever things aren’t going well politically. Instead, we get a moron in a president suit.

  258. 258.

    Cyrus

    August 15, 2006 at 2:59 pm

    Ancient Purple Says:
    Let’s put Sen. Allen’s “explanation” to the test.
    …
    Now, here is a photo of Billy Ray Cyrus, best known for his hit “Achy Breaky Heart” sporting a Mullet hairstyle.

    You BASTARD!

    Darrell Says:
    …
    Yeah? Then explain for us how Israel going door to door to root out terrorists when they could have glassed the city.. 23 of Israel’s finest killed vs. 50 something Palestinians. Explain demi, how that constitutes an Israeli “war crime” as John S initially claimed (he has now completely modified his initial characterization)

    This belongs in a “Best of Darrell” file. Israel chose not to use a nuclear weapon in Jenin. Therefore, they broke no laws and crossed no ethical lines. BJ veterans might be reminded of the “don’t complain about torture because it’s not as bad as what Arabs Muslims terrorists do!” argument. Also the cavalier obsession with nuclear weapons (“glass” is a verb?) coupled with apparent ignorance of the idea that it might not be prudent to use them within miles of your own cities.

    Though on further reflection, maybe Darrell means “gassed” instead of “glassed”. That does make sense. After all, I’m sure it really was hard for Israelis to refrain from using poison gas.

    And the periods. My God, the periods. Darrell has stuck to his roots here while breaking new ground at the same time. As always, he ended the post without a period, but I see he is experimenting with using an extra one to close the first complete sentence. He is leaving out commas and periods elsewhere as well. I eagerly await the rejection of capital letters, like his role models e.e. cummings and bell hooks. Can we look forward to an interrobang in the near future?

  259. 259.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 3:03 pm

    I’m pretty sure Thymezone has the same objection to those incidents as he does with the Israeli/Hezbollah conflict.

    In this instance, you’re “pretty sure” degree of confidence is completely wrong. Thyme has alredy been asked, and he’s clarified that Afghinstan bombings which included even worse civilian ‘collateral damage’ was justified according to him, because we were not intentionally murdering innocents in Afghanistan. His implications regarding Israel were clear.. congrats, for establishing yourself as another leftist halfwit without a clue.

  260. 260.

    Darrell

    August 15, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    Therefore, they broke no laws and crossed no ethical lines.

    Tell us shit for brains, which “laws” did Israel break?

  261. 261.

    ImJohnGalt

    August 15, 2006 at 4:12 pm

    And the ebon stain grows ever darker ‘pon his soul.

  262. 262.

    Darrell

    August 16, 2006 at 12:22 am

    ImJohnGalt Says:

    And the ebon stain grows ever darker ‘pon his soul.

    You want to see a black soul IMJ? Look inside your own heart and that of your fellow leftists to find it

    I must reluctantly agree with Koffi Annan that the UN outpost was deliberately targeted. It appears our Israeli friends were sending a message that they don’t want any observers too close. Mistakes happen in war, but if I had to bet, I’d say this was intentional.

    Jeezus you leftists are some sick fucks

  263. 263.

    ImJohnGalt

    August 16, 2006 at 2:48 am

    Look inside your own heart

    Hey, at least I have one, you ignorant prick.

  264. 264.

    The Other Steve

    August 16, 2006 at 8:59 am

    You want to see a black soul IMJ? Look inside your own heart and that of your fellow leftists to find it

    I’m sorry I’m not a bleeding heart Darrell.

  265. 265.

    John S.

    August 16, 2006 at 11:55 am

    I love when Darrell casually ignores posts that nail his lying ass to the wall.

  266. 266.

    lymie

    August 16, 2006 at 1:44 pm

    So, no one lone fellow west of the Mississippi. Still no women, though, hmmmm? What are you afraid of?

Comments are closed.

Primary Sidebar

🎈Keep Balloon Juice Ad Free

Become a Balloon Juice Patreon
Donate with Venmo, Zelle or PayPal

2023 Pet Calendars

Pet Calendar Preview: A
Pet Calendar Preview: B

*Calendars can not be ordered until Cafe Press gets their calendar paper in.

Recent Comments

  • NotMax on Saturday Night Snark Open Thread: Spy Balloon All GONE!… (Feb 5, 2023 @ 5:34am)
  • David 🌈☘The Establishment☘🌈 Koch on Saturday Night Snark Open Thread: Spy Balloon All GONE!… (Feb 5, 2023 @ 5:08am)
  • Ken B on Saturday Night Snark Open Thread: Spy Balloon All GONE!… (Feb 5, 2023 @ 4:23am)
  • JCJ on Saturday Night Snark Open Thread: Spy Balloon All GONE!… (Feb 5, 2023 @ 4:04am)
  • Ruckus on Saturday Night Snark Open Thread: Spy Balloon All GONE!… (Feb 5, 2023 @ 3:52am)

Balloon Juice Posts

View by Topic
View by Author
View by Month & Year
View by Past Author

Featuring

Medium Cool
Artists in Our Midst
Authors in Our Midst
We All Need A Little Kindness
Favorite Dogs & Cats
Classified Documents: A Primer

Calling All Jackals

Site Feedback
Nominate a Rotating Tag
Submit Photos to On the Road
Balloon Juice Mailing List Signup
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Links)
Balloon Juice Anniversary (All Posts)

Front-pager Twitter

John Cole
DougJ (aka NYT Pitchbot)
Betty Cracker
Tom Levenson
TaMara
David Anderson
ActualCitizensUnited

Shop Amazon via this link to support Balloon Juice   

Join the Fight!

Join the Fight Signup Form
All Join the Fight Posts

Balloon Juice Events

5/14  The Apocalypse
5/20  Home Away from Home
5/29  We’re Back, Baby
7/21  Merging!

Balloon Juice for Ukraine

Donate

Site Footer

Come for the politics, stay for the snark.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Comment Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Blogroll
  • Our Artists
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 Dev Balloon Juice · All Rights Reserved · Powered by BizBudding Inc

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!